Patterns of Medical Care Cost by Service Type for Patients With Recurrent and De Novo Advanced Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: There is limited knowledge about the cost patterns of patients who receive a diagnosis of de novo and recurrent advanced cancers in the United States. METHODS: Data on patients who received a diagnosis of de novo stage IV or recurrent breast, colorectal, or lung cancer between 2000 and 2012 from 3 integrated health systems were used to estimate average annual costs for total, ambulatory, inpatient, medication, and other services during (1) 12 months preceding de novo or recurrent diagnosis (preindex) and (2) diagnosis month through 11 months after (postindex), from the payer perspective. Generalized linear regression models estimated costs adjusting for patient and clinical factors. RESULTS: Patients who developed a recurrence <1 year after their initial cancer diagnosis had significantly higher total costs in the preindex period than those with recurrence ≥1 year after initial diagnosis and those with de novo stage IV disease across all cancers (all P < .05). Patients with de novo stage IV breast and colorectal cancer had significantly higher total costs in the postindex period than patients with cancer recurrent in <1 year and ≥1 year (all P < .05), respectively. Patients in de novo stage IV and those with recurrence in ≥1 year experienced significantly higher postindex costs than the preindex period (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal distinct cost patterns between patients with de novo stage IV, recurrent <1-year, and recurrent ≥1-year cancer, suggesting unique care trajectories that may influence resource use and planning. Future cost studies among patients with advanced cancer should account for de novo versus recurrent diagnoses and timing of recurrence to obtain estimates that accurately reflect these care pattern complexities.

Impacts of Early Guideline-Directed 21-Gene Recurrence Score Testing on Adjuvant Therapy Decision Making.

PURPOSE: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay is used to help formulate adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for patients with estrogen receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Most frequently, medical oncologists order RS after surgery. Results take an additional 2 weeks to return, which can delay decision making. We conducted a prospective quality-improvement project to assess the impact of early guideline-directed RS ordering by surgeons before the first visit with a medical oncologist on adjuvant therapy decision making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical oncologists ordered RS testing following National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines at time of diagnosis or at time of surgery between July 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015. We measured the testing rate of patients eligible for RS, time to chemotherapy decisions, rates of chemotherapy use, accrual to RS-based clinical trials, cost, and physician acceptance of the policy and compared the results to patients who met eligibility criteria for early guideline-directed testing during the 6 months before the project. RESULTS: Ninety patients met eligibility criteria during the testing period. RS was ordered for 91% of patients in the early testing group compared with 76% of historical controls ( P < .001). Median time to chemotherapy decision was significantly shorter in the early testing group (20 days; 95% CI, 17 to 23 days) compared with historical controls (32 days; 95% CI, 29 to 35 days; P < .001). There were no significant differences in time to chemotherapy initiation, chemotherapy use, RS-based trial enrollment, or calculated costs between the groups. CONCLUSION: Early guideline-directed RS testing in selected patients is an effective way to shorten time to treatment decisions.

[Treatment costs of malignant cervical cancer in Poland in 2011-2012--the case of Silesian Voivodeship]. / Koszty leczenia nowotworów zlosliwych szyjki macicy w Polsce w latach 2011-2012 na przykladzie województwa slaskiego.

OBJECTIVES: As far as health economics is concerned, it is hard to determine the only useful tool which would disclose the actual costs associated with cancer. We analyzed hospitalization costs, which create the highest rate among all malignant cervical cancer-related medical costs. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the real costs of medical treatment in the case of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer based on the group with the primary and coexisting diagnoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analyzed data from 2011-2012 were obtained from the Silesian branch of the National Health Fund, which financed medical expenses due to the diagnosis of cancer in health facilities which have the agreement for such treatment. RESULTS: A total of 4 540 hospitalization-related health benefits were realized, with the final total cost was PLN 8 766 547, in the presented group of 2261 patients. The most popular procedures in patients with the diagnosis from the C53 group, included chemotherapy together with oncological hospitalization (over 62%). The vast majority of the realized procedures were treatments of the reproductive system (38%) and teleradiotherapy (about 31%). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of efficient procedures of data collection for cancer advancement hinders the economic analyses, which should constitute the foundation for the discussion about cost effectiveness of selected procedures. Adequate methods for the monitoring of direct and indirect costs associated with cervical cancer treatment ought to be created.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Stage III Colon Cancer Treatment at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world cost effectiveness of adjuvant stage III colon cancer chemotherapy regimens, given that previous analyses have been based on data from clinical trials. The study was designed using integrated decision tree and Markov model, which was developed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), capecitabine, and the combination of each with oxaliplatin. The analysis was performed from a US Veterans Affairs perspective via retrospectively collected data, over a 5-year model time horizon. Outcome and cost data were used to calculate cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY), and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. In the base case analysis, capecitabine and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin both cost more and were less effective than other regimens, and 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin, compared to 5-FU/LV alone, resulted in a cost of $25,997 per QALY gained. Model results were generally robust to parameter variation. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin could be economically reasonable if full dosing occurred ≥76% of the time (base case 42%). In a real-world setting, the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV is more effective but also more costly than 5-FU/LV alone. If full dosing of capecitabine-containing regimens can be assured, they may also be cost-effective strategies.

An estimate of the cost of treating non-melanoma skin cancer in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

BACKGROUND: The most common form of cancer in Brazil is non-melanoma skin cancer, which affects approximately 0.06% of the population. There are no public policies for its prevention and the economic impact of its diagnosis has yet to be established. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the costs of the diagnosis and treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer in the state of São Paulo between 2000 and 2007 and to compare them with the costs associated with skin melanoma in the same period. METHODS: The Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) was used as a procedure model, adapted to the procedures at the SOBECCan Foundation at the Ribeirão Preto Cancer Hospital in São Paulo. The estimated costs were based on the costs of medical treatment in the public and private sectors in 2007. RESULTS: The mean annual costs of each individual treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer were much lower than those estimated for the treatment of skin melanoma. Nevertheless, when the total costs of the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer were taken into consideration, it was found that the total cost of the 42,184 cases of this type of cancer in São Paulo within the study period was 14% higher than the costs of the 2,740 cases of skin melanoma registered in the same period within the Brazilian National Health Service (SUS). However, in the private sector, the total cost was approximately 34% less for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer compared to melanoma. CONCLUSION: The high number of cases of non-melanoma skin cancer in Brazil, with 114,000 new cases predicted for 2010, 95% of which are diagnosed at early stages, represents a financial burden to the public and private healthcare systems of around R$37 million and R$26 million annually, respectively.

Estimativa do custo do tratamento do câncer de pele tipo não-melanoma no Estado de São Paulo - Brasil / An estimate of the cost of treating non-melanoma skin cancer in the state of São Paulo, Brazil

FUNDAMENTOS: O câncer de maior incidência no Brasil é o de pele não-melanoma, que afeta aproximadamente 0,06 por cento da população. Não existem políticas públicas para sua prevenção e o impacto econômico do seu diagnóstico não tem sido avaliado. OBJETIVOS: Estimar os custos do diagnóstico e tratamento do câncer de pele não-melanoma no Estado de São Paulo entre 2000 a 2007 e compará-los com os do melanoma cutâneo no mesmo período. MÉTODOS: Foi utilizado como modelo de procedimento o projeto diretriz Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), adequado aos procedimentos da Fundação SOBECCan - Hospital do Câncer de Ribeirão Preto - SP. Os custos estimados baseiam-se nos valores do tratamento médico pagos pelos setores público e privado em 2007. RESULTADOS: Os valores médios de custo individual do tratamento anual do câncer de pele não-melanoma são muito mais baixos do que os estimados para o tratamento do melanoma cutâneo. Entretanto, observados os gastos totais no tratamento do câncer de pele não-melanoma, percebe-se que os 42.184 casos deste câncer em São Paulo, no período estudado, fazem com que o custo total do seu tratamento seja 14 por cento superior ao dos 2.740 casos de melanoma cutâneo registrados no mesmo período para o SUS. Porém, para o sistema privado, o gasto total é, aproximadamente, 34 por cento menor para o tratamento do câncer de pele não-melanoma. CONCLUSÃO: O elevado número de casos de câncer de pele não-melanoma no Brasil - com 114 mil novos casos previstos para 2010, sendo 95 por cento diagnosticados em estágios precoces - representa um impacto financeiro ao sistema público e aos sistemas privados de saúde de cerca de R$ 37 milhões e R$ 26 milhões ao ano, respectivamente.

BACKGROUND: The most common form of cancer in Brazil is non-melanoma skin cancer, which affects approximately 0.06 percent of the population. There are no public policies for its prevention and the economic impact of its diagnosis has yet to be established. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the costs of the diagnosis and treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer in the state of São Paulo between 2000 and 2007 and to compare them with the costs associated with skin melanoma in the same period. METHODS: The Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) was used as a procedure model, adapted to the procedures at the SOBECCan Foundation at the Ribeirão Preto Cancer Hospital in São Paulo. The estimated costs were based on the costs of medical treatment in the public and private sectors in 2007. RESULTS: The mean annual costs of each individual treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer were much lower than those estimated for the treatment of skin melanoma. Nevertheless, when the total costs of the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer were taken into consideration, it was found that the total cost of the 42,184 cases of this type of cancer in São Paulo within the study period was 14 percent higher than the costs of the 2,740 cases of skin melanoma registered in the same period within the Brazilian National Health Service (SUS). However, in the private sector, the total cost was approximately 34 percent less for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer compared to melanoma. CONCLUSION: The high number of cases of non-melanoma skin cancer in Brazil, with 114,000 new cases predicted for 2010, 95 percent of which are diagnosed at early stages, represents a financial burden to the public and private healthcare systems of around R$37 million and R$26 million annually, respectively.

Estimativa do custo do tratamento de câncer de pele tipo melanoma no Estado de São Paulo - Brasil / An estimate of the cost of treating mlanoma disease in the state of Sao Paulo - Brazil

FUNDAMENTOS: O impacto econômico do diagnóstico e do tratamento do melanoma cutâneo não tem sido analisado no Brasil. Uma vez que crescem tanto a incidência do câncer de pele quanto a preocupação com ele, é importante que isto seja avaliado. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste trabalho foi estimar o custo direto de diagnosticar e tratar em seus diversos estádios o melanoma cutâneo em número de casos ocorridos no Estado de São Paulo, entre 2000 e 2007. MÉTODOS: Como modelo de procedimento, foi utilizado o projeto diretriz (Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology), editado pelo National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) e adequado aos procedimentos da Fundação SobecCan - Hospital do Câncer de Ribeirão Preto - SP. Os custos estimados se baseiam nos valores do tratamento médico pagos pelo setor público (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS) e pelo setor privado (convênios) em 2007. Houve 2.740 casos diagnosticados e estadiados no Estado de São Paulo no período estudado. RESULTADOS: O custo total de tratamento dos melanomas malignos diagnosticados no estádio inicial, em valores de 2007, foi estimado em R$ 33.012.725,10 para o SUS e R$ 76.133.662,80 para os convênios.Os estádios iniciais 0, I e II da doença compreendem aproximadamente 4,2 por cento (SUS) e 1, 3 por cento (convênios) do custo total; os estádios III e IV consomem 95,8 por cento e 98,7 por cento do custo total, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados apresentados reforçam o argumento de que o diagnóstico do melanoma cutâneo em seus estádios iniciais reduz os custos de tratamento, gerando considerável economia tanto para o sistema público de saúde (SUS) quanto para o sistema privado (convênios).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the direct cost of diagnosing and treating melanoma disease in Sao Paulo (Brazil) between the years 2000 and 2007. METHODS: The project Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology was used, adapted to the proceedings of SOBECCan Foundation. The estimated costs were based on the values of the medical treatment paid by the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) and private healthcare insurance companies (PHIC) in 2007. RESULTS: The total cost was estimated in R$33,012,725.1 (SUS) and R$76,133,662.8 (PHIC). Stages 0, I and II comprised about 4.2 percent (SUS) and 1.3 percent (PHIC) of the total cost; stages III and IV amounted to 95.8 percent and 98.7 percent of the total cost, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of malignant melanoma in its initial stages reduces treatment costs generating considerable savings of resources for both National Health System and private healthcare insurance companies.

Appraising the economic efficiency of cancer treatment: an exploratory analysis of lung cancer.

This paper tests whether the measured cost-effectiveness of treating different subgroups of an incident population of lung cancer patients differs significantly and, by implication, whether the provision of care to these patients is tolerably efficient in economic terms. Data from administrative records and Registry follow-up on 544 non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed at a single NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center are used to conduct the empirical analysis. The main results show statistically significant differences in cumulative costs and patient outcomes across subgroups differing by disease stage and treatment modality. These findings imply that the delivery of lung cancer care is inefficient. Substantive and methodological implications are discussed.

Oral cancer treatment costs in Greece and the effect of advanced disease.

BACKGROUND: The main purpose of the study was to quantify the direct costs of oral cancer treatment to the healthcare system of Greece. Another aim was to identify factors that affect costs and potential cost reduction items. More specifically, we examined the relationship between stage of disease, modality of treatment and total direct costs. METHODS: The medical records and clinic files of the Oral and Maxillofacial Clinic of the Athens General Hospital "Genimatas" were abstracted to investigate clinical treatment characteristics, including length of hospitalization, modes of treatment, stage of disease etc. Records of 95 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSSC), with at least six months of follow-up, were examined. The clinical data was then used to calculate actual direct costs, based on 2001 market values. RESULTS: The mean total direct costs for OSSC treatment estimated at euro 8,450 or approximately US$ 7,450. Costs depended on the stage of the disease, with significant increases in stages III and IV, as compared with stages I and II (p < 0.05). Multi-modality treatment applied mainly to patients in stages III and IV was the factor that affected the cost. Disease stage was also associated with the total duration of hospitalization (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical management of advanced oral cancer is strongly associated with higher costs. Although the ideal would be to prevent cancer, the combination of high-risk screening, early diagnosis and early treatment seems the most efficient way to reduce costs, and most importantly, prolong life.

Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of alternative staging strategies for non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify the optimal strategy for staging the mediastinum of patients with known non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stratified by tumor (T) classification. METHODS: We used a decision-analytic model to compare the health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of three staging strategies: (1) chest computed tomography alone, (2) selective mediastinoscopy, and (3) routine mediastinoscopy. The overall effectiveness and cost of each strategy was a function of the proportion of patients accurately staged and the risks, benefits, and costs of the diagnostic tests and treatments used. Probability estimates and costs were derived from primary data and the literature. We adopted a societal perspective and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Both mediastinoscopy strategies correctly identified more patients with mediastinal involvement (N2/N3 disease) and assigned them to multimodal regimens. Routine mediastinoscopy maximized quality-adjusted life expectancy in all patients, irrespective of T classification, and this result was robust to varying the model estimates over their reported ranges. In T1 patients, selective mediastinoscopy cost $24,500 per QALY gained, compared with $78,800 per QALY gained for routine mediastinoscopy. In T2 and T3 patients, the ICER of routine mediastinoscopy was more favorable ($42,800 and $53,400 per QALY gained, respectively). CONCLUSION: Routine mediastinoscopy maximizes quality-adjusted life expectancy in patients with known NSCLC, and its ICER compares favorably with other currently accepted medical technologies. The survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of this strategy are greater in patients with T2 and T3 tumors and are likely to improve with advances in multimodal therapy.

Comparison of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix.

The results of our study highlight the need for change in the pretreatment workup of clinical stage Ib cervical cancer. The routine use of excretory urography, barium enema, cystoscopy,and sigmoidoscopy is not justified. MR evaluation is recommended in patients with lesions larger than 2 cm (the group with the greatest increase in predictive value). Although CT scanning is not recommended for the evaluation of parametrial invasion, both CT scanning and MR imaging provide similar positive and negative posttest probabilities for the evaluation of nodal disease.

Stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: are all staging tests and procedures necessary?

The prognostic value and cost effectiveness of generally recommended ancillary tests and staging procedures in 115 patients with clinical Stage IB carcinoma of the cervix were retrospectively reviewed. All 112 intravenous pyelograms, 108 barium enemas, 102 cystoscopies and 98 sigmoidoscopies were normal. No malignant cells were found in pelvic washings. Of 111 patients who had paraaortic lymph node biopsies, only one had a positive node. This node was grossly enlarged and clinically suspicious. Paraaortic lymph node status was not influenced by tumor grade, prior conization, lymphovascular space involvement, depth of stromal invasion, positive pelvic lymph nodes or number of paraaortic nodes biopsied. The tests evaluated in this study are unnecessary and should no longer be performed in patients with clinical Stage IB carcinoma of the cervix. In addition, paraaortic lymph node biopsies in the absence of clinically suspicious nodes are not warranted. Eliminating these tests and procedures would result in substantial savings in health care cost.