Thalamic deep brain stimulation for acquired dystonia in children and young adults: a phase 1 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy and safety of combined bilateral ventralis oralis posterior/ventralis intermedius (Vop/Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of acquired dystonia in children and young adults. Pallidal DBS is efficacious for severe, medication-refractory isolated dystonia, providing 50%-60% long-term improvement. Unfortunately, pallidal stimulation response rates in acquired dystonia are modest and unpredictable, with frequent nonresponders. Acquired dystonia, most commonly caused by cerebral palsy, is more common than isolated dystonia in pediatric populations and is more recalcitrant to standard treatments. Given the limitations of pallidal DBS in acquired dystonia, there is a need to explore alternative brain targets. Preliminary evidence has suggested that thalamic stimulation may be efficacious for acquired dystonia. METHODS: Four participants, 3 with perinatal brain injuries and 1 with postencephalitic symptomatic dystonia, underwent bilateral Vop/Vim DBS and bimonthly evaluations for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) scores between the baseline and 12-month assessments. Video documentation was used for blinded ratings. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score), quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL] and modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II [UPDRS-II] scores), and neuropsychological assessments. Adverse events were monitored for safety. RESULTS: All participants tolerated the procedure well, and there were no safety concerns or serious adverse events. There was an average improvement of 21.5% in the BFMDRS motor subscale score, but the improvement was only 1.6% according to the BADS score. Following blinded video review, dystonia severity ratings were even more modest. Secondary outcomes, however, were more encouraging, with the BFMDRS disability subscale score improving by 15.7%, the PedsQL total score by 27%, and the modified UPDRS-II score by 19.3%. Neuropsychological assessment findings were unchanged 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral thalamic neuromodulation by DBS for severe, medication-refractory acquired dystonia was well tolerated. Primary and secondary outcomes showed highly variable treatment effect sizes comparable to those of pallidal stimulation in this population. As previously described, improvements in quality of life and disability were not reflected in dystonia severity scales, suggesting a need for the development of scales specifically for acquired dystonia.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03078816 (clinicaltrials.gov).

High-frequency electrical stimulation of the anterior thalamic nuclei increases vigilance in epilepsy patients during relaxed and drowsy wakefulness.

OBJECTIVE: High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of anterior thalamic nuclei (ANT) reduces the frequency and intensity of focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic epileptic seizures. We investigated the impact of high-frequency ANT-DBS on vigilance in epilepsy patients during relaxed and drowsy wakefulness, to better understand the effects and the mechanisms of action of this intervention in humans. METHODS: Four patients with different structural epileptic pathologies were included in this retrospective case-cohort study. Short- and long-term electroencephalography (EEG) was used to determine states of relaxed or drowsy wakefulness and the vigilance changes during stimulation-on and stimulation-off intervals. RESULTS: In relaxed, wakeful patients with eyes closed, the eyelid artifact rate increased acutely and reproducibly during stimulation-on intervals, suggesting an enhanced vigilance. This effect was accompanied by a slight acceleration of the alpha rhythm. In drowsy patients with eyes closed, stimulation generated acutely and reproducibly alpha rhythms, similar to the paradoxical alpha activation during eyes opening. The occurrence of the alpha rhythms reflected an increase in the vigilance of the drowsy subjects during ANT-DBS. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first demonstration that ANT-DBS increases the vigilance of wakeful epilepsy patients. Our results deliver circumstantial evidence that high-frequency ANT-DBS activates thalamocortical connections that promote wakefulness.

Patients' Perioperative Experience of Awake Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND: Awake craniotomy for tumor resection and epilepsy surgery is a well-tolerated procedure. Qualitative data on patients' experience of awake deep-brain stimulation (DBS) are, however, lacking. We collected qualitative data on patients' experience of awake DBS with a view to identifying areas for improvement. METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing DBS for Parkinson disease between 2009 and 2015 were surveyed with a structured questionnaire designed to receive patient feedback regarding perioperative management of the awake stage of the procedure. RESULTS: More than 90% of patients felt well-informed. Most remembered the procedure, and almost all were happy that they did. One half of the patients experienced pain, often significant, during the procedure. This mainly occurred during burr-hole drilling and stereotactic frame placement. CONCLUSIONS: Although awake DBS is well-tolerated, pain and off-period symptoms are an issue for a significant number of patients. Efforts should be made to minimize these unpleasant aspects of awake DBS.

Verbal fluency in essential tremor patients: the effects of deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of different frequencies of thalamic Deep-Brain-Stimulation (DBS) on cognitive performance of patients suffering from Essential Tremor (ET). METHODS: In 17 ET-patients with thalamic-DBS, Tremor-Rating-Scale (TRS), standardized phonemic and semantic verbal fluency (VF), Stroop-Color-Word-Test and Digit-span-test were investigated in three randomized stimulation-settings: i) high-frequency stimulation (HFS), ii) low-frequency stimulation (LFS) and iii) OFF-stimulation (DBS-OFF). Paired-samples t-test for TRS and one-way repeated measures analysis of variance for cognitive performance were calculated. RESULTS: Tremor was reduced during HFS (MeanTRS-HFS = 12.9 ± 9.6) compared to DBS-OFF (MeanTRS-OFF = 44.4 ± 19.8, P < .001) and to LFS (MeanTRS-10 Hz = 50.0 ± 24.2; P < .001). While performance of Stroop-task and digit-span remained unaffected by stimulation-settings (P > .05), phonemic and semantic VF differed significantly between the three conditions (FPvf = 5.28, FSvf = 3.41, both P < .05). Post-hoc comparisons revealed significant differences for both phonemic and semantic VF between LFS (MeanPvf-10 Hz = 54.6 ± 9.2, MeanSvf-10 Hz = 56.4 ± 7.9) and HFS (MeanPvf-ON = 48.3 ± 11.4, MeanSvf-ON = 51.1 ± 11.0, both P < .05), while DBS-OFF (MeanPvf-OFF = 51.2 ± 9.3, MeanSvf-OFF = 53.6 ± 12.9) and HFS and DBS-OFF and LFS did not differ significantly (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: HFS compared to LFS or DBS-OFF significantly reduced tremor but simultaneously worsened VF while working memory and cognitive inhibition remained unaffected. In contrast, LFS enhanced VF but did not ameliorate tremor. The data emphasize the relevance of thalamocortical loops for verbal fluency but also suggest that more sophisticated DBS-regimes in ET may improve both motor and cognitive performance.

Perceptions of symptoms and expectations of advanced therapy for Parkinson's disease: preliminary report of a Patient-Reported Outcome tool for Advanced Parkinson's disease (PRO-APD).

BACKGROUND: What do patients expect from a treatment? A patient-centred approach to treatment is becoming necessary given the choices for invasive treatments for Parkinson's disease. Patient's perceptions of severity and expectations from complex therapies have not been studied. We describe the rationale and concept of developing a Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) tool to assess perceptions of symptom severity and expectations of therapy. We report preliminary findings from use of the tool, association with clinical factors, and illustrate the potential use in individual patients awaiting therapy. METHODS: Patient symptoms were grouped into four domains, with 8 motor, 7 non-motor, 7 psychological and 4 social questions. For each question, symptom severity was rated on a Likert scale scoring from 0 (no problem) to 7 (perceived as a severe problem). Similarly, the expectation for each symptom to change after therapy was rated on a Likert scale: score -3 (expected to be very much worse) to + 3 (expected to be very much improved). RESULTS: 22 consecutive patients, routinely planned to receive one of Deep Brain Stimulation/Intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion/Apomorphine Infusion therapies, were recruited: 13 male, mean (+/-sd) age: 65.6 (+/-9.5) years, mean (+/-sd) disease duration: 14.3 (+/-5.7) years. Subjective severity scores are reported as mean (+/-sd) / maximum possible score: (i) motor 23.5 (+/-7.5) / 56, (ii) non-motor 15.5 (+/-5.6) / 49, (iii) cognitive - psychological 12.4 (+/-5.8) / 49, (iv) social 9.3 (+/-4.1) / 28. Expectation of change (improvement) scores are reported as mean (+/-sd) / maximum possible score of: (i) motor 14.0 (+/-5.6) / 24, (ii) non-motor 8.5 (+/-4.1) / 21, (iii) cognitive - psychological 7.4 (+/-4.4)/ 21, and (iv) social 5.5 (+/-2.8) / 12. For each domain, Spearman correlation coefficient showed significant associations between severity and expectation within-domain. CONCLUSION: This tool (PRO-APD) provides a description of perceived problem severity and expectation of treatments encompassing a holistic patient-driven view of care. PD patients about to receive complex therapy have moderately high perception of symptom load in multiple domains, and expect substantial improvements in multiple domains. These preliminary findings may be useful in documenting multi-domain symptoms, as well as counseling patients to help them reach realistic expectations and reduce potential dissatisfaction following therapy.

Neuromodulation, agency and autonomy.

Neuromodulation consists in altering brain activity to restore mental and physical functions in individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders and brain and spinal cord injuries. This can be achieved by delivering electrical stimulation that excites or inhibits neural tissue, by using electrical signals in the brain to move computer cursors or robotic arms, or by displaying brain activity to subjects who regulate that activity by their own responses to it. As enabling prostheses, deep-brain stimulation and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are forms of extended embodiment that become integrated into the individual's conception of himself as an autonomous agent. In BCIs and neurofeedback, the success or failure of the techniques depends on the interaction between the learner and the trainer. The restoration of agency and autonomy through neuromodulation thus involves neurophysiological, psychological and social factors.

The emerging use of brain stimulation treatments for psychiatric disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the current state of development and application of a wide range of brain stimulation approaches in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. METHOD: The approaches reviewed include forms of minimally invasive magnetic and electrical stimulation, seizure induction, implanted devices and several highly novel approaches in early development. RESULTS: An extensive range of brain stimulation approaches are now being widely used in the treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders, or actively investigated for this use. Both vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been introduced into clinical practice in some countries. A small body of research suggests that VNS has some potentially long-lasting antidepressant effects in a minority of patients treated. rTMS has now been extensively investigated for over 15 years, with a large body of research now supporting its antidepressant effects. Further rTMS research needs to focus on defining the most appropriate stimulation methods and exploring its longer term use in maintenance protocols. Very early data suggest that magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has promise in the treatment of patients referred for electroconvulsive therapy: MST appears to have fewer side effects and may have similar efficacy. A number of other approaches including surgical and alternative forms of electrical stimulation appear to alter brain activity in a promising manner, but are in need of evaluation in more substantive patient samples. CONCLUSIONS: It appears likely that the range of psychiatric treatments available for patients will grow over the coming years to progressively include a number of novel brain stimulation techniques.

Neuropsychologic effects of neuromodulation techniques for treatment-resistant depression: a review.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ablative neurosurgical procedures are established interventions for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but their use may be limited in part by neuropsychological adverse effects. Additional neuromodulation strategies are being developed that aim to match or exceed the efficacy of ECT/ablative surgery with a better neurocognitive side effect profile. In this review, we briefly discuss the neurocognitive effects of ECT and ablative neurosurgical procedures, then synthesize the available neurocognitive information for emerging neuromodulation therapies, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy, transcranial direct current stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation. The available evidence suggests these procedures may be more cognitively benign relative to ECT or ablative neurosurgical procedures, though further research is clearly needed to fully evaluate the neurocognitive effects, both positive and negative, of these novel neuromodulation interventions.