Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for post-stroke depression: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It is a well-established fact that post-stroke depression (PSD) is a prevalent condition that affects a significant proportion of individuals who have suffered a stroke. Hence, our research endeavors to explore the safety, efficacy and the potential molecular mechanism of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) for the treatment of depression in PSD patients by conducting a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial. METHODS: Patients who had experienced strokes and exhibited depressive symptoms, with a Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) score of ≥8 and met the DSM-IV criteria, were diagnosed with PSD. A volunteer sample of participants (N = 80) were randomly divided into either the ta-VNS group (which received ta-VNS in addition to conventional treatment) or the control group (which received conventional treatment only), in a 1:1 ratio. The effectiveness of the interventions was evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Barthel Index (BI) scores. Furthermore, Plasma BDNF, CREB1, and 5-HT levels were measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: The concomitant application of ta-VNS demonstrated a remarkable reduction in HAMD-17 and SDS scores, leading to noteworthy enhancements in patients' daily functioning, as evidenced by improved activities of daily living, at all assessed time points, in contrast to the control group (p < 0.0001). Notably, the ta-VNS group exhibited superior effects in modulating the measured neurotrophic biomarkers when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The synergistic approach of combining ta-VNS with conventional treatment has demonstrated remarkable efficacy and tolerability in managing depression following a stroke.

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Normalizes Induced Gastric Myoelectrical Dysrhythmias in Controls Assessed by Body-Surface Gastric Mapping.

OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (TaVNS) is a supplementary treatment for gastric symptoms resulting from dysrhythmias. The main objective of this study was to quantify the effects of 10, 40, and 80 Hz TaVNS and sham in healthy individuals in response to a 5-minute water-load (WL5) test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers aged between 21 and 55 years (body mass index: 27.1 ± 3.2) were recruited. Each subject fasted for up to eight hours and participated in four 95-minute sessions, which consisted of 30 fasted baseline, 30 minutes TaVNS, WL5, and 30 minutes post-WL5. Heart rate variability was assessed using sternal electrocardiogram. Body-surface gastric mapping and bloating (/10) were recorded. One-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test was performed to test the difference between TaVNS protocols in terms of frequency, amplitude, bloating scores, root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD), and stress index (SI). RESULTS: On average, the subjects consumed 526 ± 160 mL of water, with volume ingested correlated to bloating (mean score 4.1 ± 1.8; r = 0.36, p = 0.029). In general, the reduction in frequency and rhythm stability during the post-WL5 period in sham was normalized by all three TaVNS protocols. Both 40- and 80-Hz protocols also caused increases in amplitude during the stim-only and/or post-WL5 periods. RMSSD increased during the 40-Hz protocol. SI increased during the 10-Hz protocol but decreased during the 40- and 80-Hz protocols. CONCLUSION: TaVNS proved effective in normalizing gastric dysrhythmias by WL5 in healthy subjects by altering both parasympathetic and sympathetic pathways.

The efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is used for treating depression but the efficacy and safety have not been well assessed. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of taVNS in depression. METHODS: The retrieval databases included English databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO, and Chinese databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and Sino Med, and the retrieval period was from their inception to November 10, 2022. The clinical trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) were also searched. Standardized mean difference and the risk ratio were used as the effect indicator and the effect size was represented by the 95 % confidence interval. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence respectively. RESULTS: Totally, 12 studies of 838 participants were included. taVNS could significantly improve depression and reduce Hamilton Depression Scale scores. Low to very low evidence showed that taVNS had higher response rates than sham-taVMS and comparable response rates compared to antidepressants (ATD) and that taVNS combined with ATD had comparable efficacy to ATD with fewer side effects. LIMITATIONS: The number of studies in subgroups was small and the evidence quality was low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: taVNS is an effective and safe method for alleviating depression scores and had a comparable response rate to ATD.

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Treatment Protocols and Stimulation Parameters.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has promising therapeutic potential in a wide range of applications across somatic and psychiatric conditions. Compared with invasive vagus nerve stimulation, good safety and tolerability profiles also support the use of tVNS in pediatric patients. Potential neurodevelopment-specific needs, however, raise concerns regarding the age-appropriate adjustment of treatment protocols and applied stimulation parameters. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to review registered trials and published studies to synthesize existing tVNS treatment protocols and stimulation parameters applied in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of electronic data bases (PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) and ClinicalTrials was conducted. Information on patient and study-level characteristics (eg, clinical condition, sample size), the tVNS device (eg, brand name, manufacturer), stimulation settings (eg, pulse width, stimulation intensity), and stimulation protocol (eg, duration, dosage of stimulation) was extracted. RESULTS: We identified a total of 15 publications (four study protocols) and 15 registered trials applying tVNS in pediatric patients (<18 years of age). Most of these studies did not exclusively address pediatric patients. None of the studies elaborated on neurodevelopmental aspects or justified the applied protocol or stimulation parameters for use in pediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: No dedicated pediatric tVNS devices exist. Neither stimulation parameters nor stimulation protocols for tVNS are properly justified in pediatric patients. Evidence on age-dependent stimulation effects of tVNS under a neurodevelopment framework is warranted. We discuss the potential implications of these findings with clinical relevance, address some of the challenges of tVNS research in pediatric populations, and point out key aspects in future device development and research in addition to clinical studies on pediatric populations.

Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention.

The efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A double blinded randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There are 9.9 million new cases of dementia in the world every year. Short-term conversion rate from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia is between 20% and 40%, but long-term in 5-10 years ranges from 60% to 100%. It is particularly important to prevent or prolong the development of MCI into dementia. Both auriculotherapy and vagus nerve stimulation are effective on improving cognitive functions. However, there is no double blinded randomized clinical trial to support the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of auricular acupoints in patients with MCI. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial involved patients with MCI, aged from 55 to 75 years old. Patients were randomly allocated to transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) group or sham taVNS group. In the taVNS group, two auricular acupoints were stimulated, including heart (concha, CO15) and kidney (CO10), which are in the distribution of vagus nerve. While in the sham taVNS group, two other auricular acupoints were stimulated, including elbow (scaphoid fossa, SF3) and shoulder (SF4,5), which are out of the distribution of vagus nerve. The primary outcome was the Montreal cognitive assessment-basic, MOCA-B. The secondary outcomes included auditory verbal learning test-HuaShan version (AVLT-H), shape trails test A&B (STT-A&B), animal fluence test (AFT), Boston naming test (BNT), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire (RBDSQ), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and functional activities questionnaire (FAQ). These outcome measures were taken at baseline, 24 weeks later. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of intervention, the data of 52 patients were intended for analysis. After intervention, there was significant difference in the overall scores of MoCA-B between taVNS group and sham taVNS group (p = 0.033 < 0.05). In taVNS group, compared with before intervention, the overall scores of MOCA-B increased significantly after intervention (p < 0.001). As for N5 and N7, the two sub-indicators of AVLT-H, in taVNS group, compared with before intervention, both N5 and N7 increased significantly after intervention (both ps < 0.001). As for STTB, in taVNS group, compared with before intervention, STTB was significantly reduced after intervention (p = 0.016). For BNT, in taVNS group, compared with before intervention, BNT increased significantly after intervention (p < 0.001). In taVNS group, compared with before intervention, PSQI, RBDSQ, ESS and FAQ decreased significantly after intervention (p = 0.002, 0.025, <0.001, 0.006 respectively). 1 patient with a history of tympanic membrane perforation in taVNS group was reported with mild adverse reactions which disappeared a week after termination of taVNS. The intervention of taVNS is effective on increasing the overall scores of MoCA-B, N5 and N7. CONCLUSION: The clinical trial demonstrated that taVNS can improve cognitive performance in patients with MCI. This inexpensive, effective and innovative method can be recommended as a therapy for more patients with MCI in the prevention or prolonging of its development into dementia, but it is still required to be further investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn. (ID: ChiCTR2000038868).

[Clinical Application of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation].

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) refers to stimulation of the vagus nerve through the skin of the left cymba conchae and is a unique strategy that is investigated as a useful therapeutic approach for a variety of conditions including epilepsy, depression, cardiac diseases, tinnitus, and migraine. A randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Although several pilot studies were performed before this trial and showed that taVNS was safe, well tolerated, and feasible for long-term treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed between the high- and low-stimulation groups, and further studies are warranted to gain a deeper understanding of this subject. A tingling sensation or pain at the site of stimulation is the most common adverse effect associated with taVNS. Therefore, intermittent stimulation, ranging from 30 minutes to several hours, is provided during each session several times a day. Currently, taVNS is not approved for insurance coverage by the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Further studies and investigations are necessary in the near future.

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Feasibility Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Preclinical studies have shown that surgically implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) promotes recovery of consciousness and cognitive function following experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study is to report the feasibility and safety of a noninvasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) in patients with persistent impairment of consciousness following severe TBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The feasibility of tVNS was evaluated in five patients presenting with diffuse axonal injury and reduced dominant EEG activity one month following severe TBI. tVNS was applied to the left cymba conchae of the external ear using a skin electrode four hours daily for eight weeks. Possible effects of tVNS on physiological parameters and general side effects were recorded. In addition, we report the rate of recovery using coma recovery scale revised (CRS-R). RESULTS: The tVNS regime of four hours daily for eight weeks was feasible and well tolerated with little side effects and no clinically relevant effects on physiological parameters. Three patients showed improvements (>3 points) in the CRS-R following eight weeks tVNS. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that tVNS is a feasible and safe VNS strategy for patients following severe TBI. Controlled studies are needed to clarify whether tVNS has a potential to promote recovery of consciousness following severe TBI.

Relation of Fractionated Atrial Potentials With the Vagal Innervation Evaluated by Extracardiac Vagal Stimulation During Cardioneuroablation.

BACKGROUND: Vagal hyperactivity is directly related to several clinical conditions as reflex/functional bradyarrhythmias and vagal atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardioneuroablation provides therapeutic vagal denervation through endocardial radiofrequency ablation for these cases. The main challenges are neuromyocardium interface identification and the denervation control and validation. The finding that the AF-Nest (AFN) ablation eliminates the atropine response and decreases RR variability suggests that they are related to the vagal innervation. METHOD: Prospective, controlled, longitudinal, nonrandomized study enrolling 62 patients in 2 groups: AFN group (AFN group 32 patients) with functional or reflex bradyarrhythmias or vagal AF treated with AFN ablation and a control group (30 patients) with anomalous bundles, ventricular premature beats, atrial flutter, atrioventricular nodal reentry, and atrial tachycardia, treated with conventional ablation (non-AFN ablation). In AFN group, ablation delivered at AFN detected by fragmentation/fractionation of the endocardial electrograms and by 3-dimensional anatomic location of the ganglionated plexus. Vagal response was evaluated before, during, and postablation by 5 s noncontact vagal stimulation at the jugular foramen, through the internal jugular veins (extracardiac vagal stimulation [ECVS]), analyzing 15 s mean heart rate, longest RR, pauses, and atrioventricular block. All patients had current guidelines arrhythmia ablation indication. RESULTS: Preablation ECVS induced sinus pauses, asystole, and transient atrioventricular block in both groups showing a strong vagal response (P=0.96). Postablation ECVS in the AFN group showed complete abolishment of the cardiac vagal response in all cases (pre/postablation ECVS=P<0.0001), demonstrating robust vagal denervation. However, in the control group, vagal response remained practically unchanged postablation (P=0.35), showing that non-AFN ablation promotes no significant denervation. CONCLUSIONS: AFN ablation causes significant vagal denervation. Non-AFN ablation causes no significant vagal denervation. These results suggest that AFNs are intrinsically related to vagal innervation. ECVS was fundamental to stepwise vagal denervation validation during cardioneuroablation. Visual Overview A visual overview is available for this article.

New approaches for treating atrial fibrillation: Focus on autonomic modulation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a rapidly growing clinical problem in routine practice, both for cardiologists as well as general practitioners. Current therapies aimed at the management of AF include anti-arrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation. These therapies have a number of limitations and risks, and have disappointing long-term efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm and improving hard clinical outcomes. Because of this, there is growing interest in pursuing alternative management strategies in patients with AF. This review seeks to highlight emerging AF therapies, with a specific focus on several modalities aimed at modulation of the autonomic nervous system. These therapies have shown promise in early pre-clinical and clinical trials, and represent exciting alternatives to standard AF treatment.

Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation improves gastroenteric complaints in Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal dysfunctions are common in Parkinson's disease. Their management is still challenging and new treatment options are needed. OBJECTIVE: To test whether transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation can improve gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind pilot study enrolling patients suffering from Parkinson's disease with gastroenteric complaints. Patients were randomized to use either a sham-device or to stimulate the vagal nerve with an electric device over the course of four weeks with four stimulations per day. Ten patients (aged 69.6±4.6 years) were randomized for the intervention group, and nine patients (aged 67.2±6.3 years) used a sham-device. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale whereas gastrointestinal motility was measured with the 13C-octanoic acid breath test. RESULTS: In the treatment group, vagal nerve stimulation improved the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale comparing before and after stimulation (before, 8.7±6.09; after 5.67±3.08; p-value 0.48). This improvement was not observed in the sham group (before, 7.44±4.85; after, 5.67±3.08; p-value 0.16). In the 13C-octanoic acid breath test no significant changes were detectable. CONCLUSIONS: Vagal nerve stimulation is well tolerated with no side effects and may be a promising non-invasive therapy option to improve gastroenteric symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

Implantable Electronic Stimulation Devices from Head to Sacrum: Imaging Features and Functions.

Electronic stimulation devices are implanted in various locations in the body to decrease pain, modulate nerve function, or stimulate various end organs. The authors describe these devices using a craniocaudal approach, first describing deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices and ending with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) devices. The radiology-relevant background information for each device and its imaging appearance are also described. These devices have a common design theme and include the following components: (a) a pulse generator that houses the battery and control electronics, (b) an insulated lead or wire that conveys signals to the last component, which is (c) an electrode that contacts the end organ and senses and/or acts on the end organ. DBS electrodes are inserted into various deep gray nuclei, most commonly to treat the symptoms of movement disorders. Occipital, trigeminal, and spinal nerve stimulation devices are used as second-line therapy to control craniofacial or back pain. For cardiac devices, the authors describe two newer devices, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and the leadless pacemaker, both of which avoid complications related to having leads threaded through the venous system. Diaphragmatic stimulation devices stimulate the phrenic nerve to restore diaphragmatic movement. Gastric electrical stimulation devices act on various parts of the stomach for the treatment of gastroparesis or obesity. Finally, SNS devices are used to modulate urinary and defecatory functions. Common complications diagnosed at imaging include infection, hematoma, lead migration, and lead breakage. Understanding the components, normal function, and normal imaging appearance of each device allows the radiologist to identify complications. ©RSNA, 2019.

Effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on muscle activity in the gastrointestinal tract (transVaGa): a prospective clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication after abdominal surgery. Invasive stimulation of the cervical vagus nerve is known to reduce inflammatory response and ameliorated POI after surgery in a mouse model. However, the transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a possible non-invasive approach. In this clinical study, we aimed to investigate the effect of tVNS on the activation of the stomach muscle in humans. METHODS: Patients requiring open laparotomy were screened for this prospective proof of concept clinical study. After open laparotomy, muscle activity of the stomach was measured by a free running electromyography (EMG) before and during tVNS on the ear. Frequency and amplitude of compound gastric action potentials were the electrophysiological parameters we assessed to reveal the changes in electro motor gastric activity. Gastrin levels as a surrogate marker for vagus nerve activation was analyzed before, 1 and 3 h after tVNS. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included, no severe adverse events and no medical device related adverse events occurred. tVNS led to significant reduction of action potential frequency and significant elevation of action potential amplitude in the stomach compared to control. Gastrin levels were significantly elevated 3 h after tVNS compared to levels before tVNS. CONCLUSION: Application of tVNS is a safe and feasible procedure during surgical intervention. Our results provide evidence that tVNS activates efferent visceral vagal fibers. Therefore, this low risk and easy to perform method could be useful to prevent postoperative ileus. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER: DRKS00013340.

Changes in self-perception in patients treated with neurostimulating devices.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, qualitative changes in self-perception have been reported in individual patients undergoing brain stimulation to treat their neurological disease. We here report a first systematic study addressing these unwanted treatment effects in a semiquantitative way. HYPOTHESES: Hypothesis 1 (H1): Changes in self-perception can be detected and documented in patients following interventions with various neurostimulating devices using standardized assessment tools. Hypothesis 2 (H2): Central nervous-implanted neurostimulating devices (deep brain stimulation [DBS]) will have a greater impact on the patient's self-perception than "peripheral" implanted devices (implanted vagus nerve stimulation [iVNS]) and external devices (transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation [tVNS] or transcutaneous electrical trigeminal nerve stimulation [eTNS]). METHODS: Application of a newly developed semiquantitative questionnaire (FST-questionnaire [Fragebogen zur Veränderung der Selbstwahrnehmung unter tiefer Hirnstimulation]: Questionnaire regarding changes in self-perception while treated with DBS) to systematically assess changes in self-perception in a single-center, cross-sectional pilot-study at the University Hospital Freiburg, Germany on 50 patients (44% male; age 50 years [range: 27-73 years]), undergoing neurostimulation (DBS, iVNS, tVNS, or eTNS) to treat Parkinson's disease or epilepsy. RESULTS: Standardized assessment detected alterations in self-perception in all treatment groups (H1 approved). This included rare self-alienating changes in self-perception. Unexpectedly, peripheral neurostimulation had similar effects as central stimulation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Properly designed questionnaires - like the FST-questionnaire as standardized assessment tool - can detect changes in self-perception in patients during neurostimulatory treatment in a wide spectrum of brain stimulation techniques. This may provide a strategy to systematically identify the subgroup of patients liable to experience such problems during treatment already prior to treatment decisions.

Safety and tolerability of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation (tVNS) may be an alternative to surgically implanted VNS for epilepsy and other diseases. However, its safety and tolerability profile is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review of treatment harms from tVNS in humans. METHODS: A systematic published and grey literature search was carried out to identify studies which deployed tVNS in human subjects. Study authors were contacted for safety/tolerability data if these were not available in the publication. Databases were searched from 1966 to May 2017. We noted study type, population, stimulation parameters, type and prevalence of side effects and/or serious adverse events (SAE). We also noted whether side effects/SAE were considered to be related to the tVNS and the proportion of participants dropping out of studies due to side effects. RESULTS: 51 studies were included comprising a total of 1322 human subjects receiving tVNS. The most common side effects were: local skin irritation from electrode placement (240 participants, 18.2%), headache (47, 3.6%) and nasopharyngitis (23, 1.7%). Whilst heterogeneity in overall side effect event rates between studies was not accounted for by the frequency (Hz) or pulse width (ms) of stimulation, a minority (35 participants (2.6%)) dropped out of studies due to side effects. Overall, 30 SAE occurred but only 3 were assessed by the relevant researchers to be possibly caused by tVNS. CONCLUSION: tVNS is safe and well tolerated at the doses tested in research studies to date.

Failing Hearts Are More Vulnerable to Sympathetic, but Not Vagal Stimulation-Induced, Atrial Fibrillation-Ameliorated with Dantrolene Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Both vagal (VS) and sympathetic (SS) stimulations can increase atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility, with VS being known as more arrhythmogenic in normal hearts. Heart failure (HF) results in autonomic dysfunction (characterized by sympathetic activation and vagal withdrawal) and is associated with an increased AF incidence. This study investigated whether failing hearts, compared with normal control hearts, respond differently to autonomic stimulation-induced AF arrhythmogenesis and the effect of dantrolene on SS-enhanced AF in HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A rat myocardial infarction (MI) HF model was used. In experiment 1, AF inducibility was compared in 9 MI-HF rats versus 10 sham-control animals at baseline, during VS, and during SS with isoproterenol infusion. In experiment 2, dantrolene treatment (n = 8) was compared with placebo-control (n = 9) on SS-induced AF inducibility in HF. Compared with the sham-control, baseline AF inducibility was higher in the MI-HF group. AF inducibility was augmented in both groups by autonomic stimulation. However, under VS the increased magnitude was less in the MI-HF group (49% ± 11% vs 80% ± 10%; P = .029), but under SS was significantly more (53% ± 8% vs 6% ± 7%; P < .001), compared with sham-control. Dantrolene significantly attenuated SS-enhanced AF in HF (69% ± 6% vs 29% ± 9%; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Failing hearts are less sensitive to VS, but more vulnerable to SS-induced AF compared with normal-control hearts. Dantrolene can significantly attenuate SS-enhanced AF in HF, indicating that cardiac ryanodine receptor dysfunction may play a critical role in SS-enhanced AF in HF, and stabilizing leaky ryanodine receptor with the use of dantrolene may be a new treatment option in this condition.

Short trains of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) have parameter-specific effects on heart rate.

BACKGROUND: Optimal parameters of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) are still undetermined. Given the vagus nerve's role in regulating heart rate (HR), it is important to determine safety and HR effects of various taVNS parameters. OBJECTIVE: We conducted two sequential trials to systematically test the effects of various taVNS parameters on HR. METHODS: 15 healthy individuals participated in the initial two-visit, crossover exploratory trial, receiving either tragus (active) or earlobe (control) stimulation each visit. Nine stimulation blocks of varying parameters (pulse width: 100 µs, 200 µs, 500 µs; frequency: 1 Hz, 10 Hz, 25 Hz) were administered each visit. HR was recorded and analyzed for stimulation-induced changes. Using similar methods and the two best parameters from trial 1 (500µs 10 Hz and 500µs 25 Hz), 20 healthy individuals then participated in a follow-up confirmatory study. RESULTS: Trial 1- There was no overall effect of the nine conditions on HR during stimulation. However multivariate analysis revealed two parameters that significantly decreased HR during active stimulation compared to control (500µs 10 Hz and 500µs 25 Hz; p < 0.01). Additionally, active taVNS significantly attenuated overall sympathetic HR rebound (post-stimulation) compared to control (p < 0.001). Trial 2-For these two conditions, active taVNS significantly decreased HR compared to control (p = 0.02), with the strongest effects at 500µs 10 Hz (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: These studies suggest that 60s blocks of tragus stimulation are safe, and some specific parameters modulate HR. Of the nine parameters studied, 500µs 10 Hz induced the greatest HR effects.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.

Response conflicts play a prominent role in the flexible adaptation of behavior as they represent context-signals that indicate the necessity for the recruitment of cognitive control. Previous studies have highlighted the functional roles of the affectively aversive and arousing quality of the conflict signal in triggering the adaptation process. To further test this potential link with arousal, participants performed a response conflict task in two separate sessions with either transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), which is assumed to activate the locus coeruleus-noradrenaline (LC-NE) system, or with neutral sham stimulation. In both sessions the N2 and P3 event-related potentials (ERP) were assessed. In line with previous findings, conflict interference, the N2 and P3 amplitude were reduced after conflict. Most importantly, this adaptation to conflict was enhanced under tVNS compared to sham stimulation for conflict interference and the N2 amplitude. No effect of tVNS on the P3 component was found. These findings suggest that tVNS increases behavioral and electrophysiological markers of adaptation to conflict. Results are discussed in the context of the potentially underlying LC-NE and other neuromodulatory (e.g., GABA) systems. The present findings add important pieces to the understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms of conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.

Auricular vagal nerve stimulation in peripheral arterial disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Auricular nerve stimulation has been proven effective in different diseases. We investigated if a conservative therapeutic alternative for claudication in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD) via electroacupuncture of the outer ear can be established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, double-blinded trial an ear acupuncture using an electroacupuncture device was carried out in 40 PAD patients in Fontaine stage IIb. Twenty patients were randomized to the verum group using a fully functional electroacupuncture device, the other 20 patients received a sham device (control group). Per patient, eight cycles (1 cycle = 1 week) of electroacupuncture were performed. The primary endpoint was defined as a significantly more frequent doubling of the absolute walking distance after eight cycles in the verum group compared to controls in a standardized treadmill testing. Secondary endpoints were a significant improvement of the total score of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) as well as improvements in health related quality of life using the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The initial walking distance significantly increased in both groups (verum group [means]: 182 [95 % CI 128-236] meters to 345 [95 % CI 227-463] meters [+ 90 %], p < 0.01; control group [means]: 159 [95 % CI 109-210] meters to 268 [95 % CI 182-366] meters [+ 69 %], p = 0.01). Twelve patients (60 %) in the verum group and five patients (25 %) in controls reached the primary endpoint of doubling walking distance (p = 0.05). The total score of WIQ significantly improved in the verum group (+ 22 %, p = 0.01) but not in controls (+ 8 %, p = 0.56). SF-36 showed significantly improvements in six out of eight categories in the verum group and only in one of eight in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Electroacupuncture of the outer ear seems to be an easy-to-use therapeutic option in an age of increasingly invasive and mechanically complex treatments for PAD patients.

Low-Level Tragus Stimulation for the Treatment of Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether low-level tragus stimulation (LL-TS) treatment could reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: The authors' previous studies suggested that LL-TS could reduce the size of myocardial injury induced by ischemia. METHODS: Patients who presented with STEMI within 12 h of symptom onset, treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, were randomized to the LL-TS group (n = 47) or the control group (with sham stimulation [n = 48]). LL-TS, 50% lower than the electric current that slowed the sinus rate, was delivered to the right tragus once the patients arrived in the catheterization room and lasted for 2 h after balloon dilatation (reperfusion). All patients were followed for 7 days. The occurrence of reperfusion-related arrhythmia, blood levels of creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and inflammatory markers, and echocardiographic characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of reperfusion-related ventricular arrhythmia during the first 24 h was significantly attenuated by LL-TS. In addition, the area under the curve for creatine kinase-MB and myoglobin over 72 h was smaller in the LL-TS group than the control group. Furthermore, blood levels of inflammatory markers were decreased by LL-TS. Cardiac function, as demonstrated by the level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, the left ventricular ejection fraction, and the wall motion index, was markedly improved by LL-TS. CONCLUSIONS: LL-TS reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with STEMI. This proof-of-concept study raises the possibility that this noninvasive strategy may be used to treat patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.