Rapid Sequence Induction With a Standard Intubation Dose of Rocuronium After Magnesium Pretreatment Compared With Succinylcholine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Succinylcholine remains the muscle relaxant of choice for rapid sequence induction (RSI) but has many adverse effects. High-dose rocuronium bromide may be an alternative to succinylcholine for RSI but recovery times are nearly doubled compared with a standard intubating dose of rocuronium. Magnesium sulfate significantly shortens the onset time of a standard intubating dose of rocuronium. We set out to investigate whether intravenous (IV) pretreatment with MgSO4 followed by a standard intubating dose of rocuronium achieved superior intubation conditions compared with succinylcholine. METHODS: Adults were randomized to receive a 15-minute IV infusion of MgSO4 (60 mg·kg-1) immediately before RSI with propofol 2 mg·kg-1, sufentanil 0.2 µg·kg-1 and rocuronium 0.6 mg·kg-1, or a matching 15-minute IV infusion of saline immediately before an identical RSI, but with succinylcholine 1 mg·kg-1. Primary end point was the rate of excellent intubating conditions 60 seconds after administration of the neuromuscular blocking agent and compared between groups using multivariable log-binomial regression model. Secondary end points were blood pressure and heart rate before induction, before and after intubation, and adverse events up to 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Among 280 randomized patients, intubating conditions could be analyzed in 259 (133 MgSO4-rocuronium and 126 saline-succinylcholine). The rate of excellent intubating conditions was 46% with MgSO4-rocuronium and 45% with saline-succinylcholine. The analysis adjusted for gender and center showed no superiority of MgSO4-rocuronium compared with saline-succinylcholine (relative risk [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.39, P = .659). The rate of excellent intubating conditions was higher in women (54% [70 of 130]) compared with men (37% [48 of 129]; adjusted RR 1.42, 95% CI, 1.07-1.91, P = .017). No significant difference between groups was observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Mean heart rate was significantly higher in the MgSO4-rocuronium group. The percentage of patients with at least 1 adverse event was lower with MgSO4-rocuronium (11%) compared with saline-succinylcholine (28%) (RR 0.38, 95% CI, 0.22-0.66, P < .001). With saline-succinylcholine, adverse events consisted mainly of postoperative muscle pain (n = 26 [19%]) and signs of histamine release (n = 13 [9%]). With MgSO4-rocuronium, few patients had pain on injection, nausea and vomiting, or skin rash during the MgSO4-infusion (n = 5 [4%]). CONCLUSIONS: IV pretreatment with MgSO4 followed by a standard intubating dose of rocuronium did not provide superior intubation conditions to succinylcholine but had fewer adverse effects.

Train-of-four guard-controlled sugammadex reversal in patients with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. It is known that the disease, which is manifested by a wide variety of symptoms, may exacerbate after anesthesia and show different responses to muscle relaxants in the normal population. It is planned to measure train-of-four (TOF) values of MS patients to be operated under general anesthesia before sugammadex application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the approval of the local ethics committee of the University of Health Sciences Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital and with written consents of participants, we anesthetized ten patients (from April 2014 to March 2017) with MS and ten American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III patients without MS. Neuromuscular conduction was assessed by the acceleromyometric method using a TOF-Guard apparatus (Organon, Holland). The patients were extubated after recovery of TOF higher than 0.9. The primary efficacy variable was the time from the start of administration of sugammadex to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of both groups, the type and duration of surgery and anesthesia applied, and the temperature of the operation room were similar. Similar characteristics of both groups were of concern for postoperative residual paralysis, and therefore we did not notice any difference between time to TOF> 90/s for both groups. CONCLUSION: Sugammadex and TOF patients will increase patient safety in general anesthesia practice.

Rocuronium is more hepatotoxic than succinylcholine in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The development of liver failure is a major problem in critically ill patients. The hepatotoxicity of many drugs, as one important reason for liver failure, is poorly screened for in human models. Rocuronium and succinylcholine are neuromuscular blocking agents used for tracheal intubation and for rapid-sequence induction. OBJECTIVE: We used an in-vitro test with a permanent cell line and compared rocuronium and succinylcholine for hepatotoxicity. DESIGN: In-vitro study. SETTING: A basic science laboratory, University Hospital Rostock, Germany. MATERIAL/(PATIENTS): The basic test compound is the permanent human liver cell line HepG2/C3A. In a standardised microtitre plate assay the toxicity of different concentrations of rocuronium, succinylcholine and plasma control was tested. INTERVENTIONS: After two incubation periods of 3 days, the viability of cells (XTT test, lactate dehydrogenase release and trypan blue staining), micro-albumin synthesis and the cytochrome 1A2 activity (metabolism of ethoxyresorufin) were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between rocuronium and succinylcholine were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way test and two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Rocuronium, but not succinylcholine, led to a significant dose-dependent decrease of viability, albumin synthesis and cytochrome 1A2 activity of test cells. CONCLUSION: An in-vitro test with a cell line showed hepatotoxicity of rocuronium that was dose-dependent. Further studies are needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of the effects of rocuronium on hepatic cellular integrity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not suitable.

Low-Dose or High-Dose Rocuronium Reversed with Neostigmine or Sugammadex for Cesarean Delivery Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial of Time to Tracheal Intubation and Extubation.

BACKGROUND: Rocuronium for cesarean delivery under general anesthesia is an alternative to succinylcholine for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia because of the availability of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. However, there are no large well-controlled studies in women undergoing general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. The aim of this noninferiority trial was to determine whether rocuronium and sugammadex confer benefit in time to tracheal intubation (primary outcome) and other neuromuscular blockade outcomes compared with succinylcholine, rocuronium, and neostigmine in women undergoing general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. METHODS: We aimed to enroll all women undergoing general anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the 2 participating university hospitals (Brno, Olomouc, Czech Republic) in this single-blinded, randomized, controlled study. Women were randomly assigned to the ROC group (muscle relaxation induced with rocuronium 1 mg/kg and reversed with sugammadex 2-4 mg/kg) or the SUX group (succinylcholine 1 mg/kg for induction, rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg for maintenance, and neostigmine 0.03 mg/kg for reversal of the neuromuscular blockade). The interval from the end of propofol administration to tracheal intubation was the primary end point with a noninferiority margin of 20 seconds. We recorded intubating conditions (modified Viby-Mogensen score), neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7; umbilical artery pH), anesthesia complications, and subjective patient complaints 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: We enrolled 240 parturients. The mean time to tracheal intubation was 2.9 seconds longer in the ROC group (95% confidence interval, -5.3 to 11.2 seconds), noninferior compared with the SUX group. Absence of laryngoscopy resistance was greater in the ROC than in the SUX groups (ROC, 87.5%; SUX, 74.2%; P = 0.019), but there were no differences in vocal cord position (P = 0.45) or intubation response (P = 0.31) between groups. No statistically significant differences in incidence of anesthesia complications or in neonatal outcome were found (10-minute Apgar score <7, P = 0.07; umbilical artery pH, P = 0.43). The incidence of postpartum myalgia was greater in the SUX group (ROC 0%; SUX 6.7%; P = 0.007). The incidence of subjective complaints was lower in the ROC group (ROC, 21.4%; SUX, 37.5%; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that rocuronium for rapid-sequence induction is noninferior for time to tracheal intubation and is accompanied by more frequent absence of laryngoscopy resistance and lower incidence of myalgia in comparison with succinylcholine for cesarean delivery under general anesthesia.

Efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of moderate and deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in patients pretreated with intravenous magnesium: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Magnesium enhances the effect of rocuronium. Sugammadex reverses rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. The authors investigated whether magnesium decreased the efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. METHODS: Thirty-two male patients were randomized in a double-blinded manner to receive magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) 60 mg/kg or placebo intravenously before induction of anesthesia with propofol, sufentanil, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored using TOF-Watch SX acceleromyography (Organon Ltd., Dublin, Ireland). In 16 patients, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered intravenously at reappearance of the second twitch of the train-of-four (moderate block). In 16 further patients, sugammadex 4 mg/kg was administered intravenously at posttetanic count 1 to 2 (deep block). Primary endpoint was recovery time from injection of sugammadex to normalized train-of-four ratio 0.9. Secondary endpoint was recovery time to final T1. RESULTS: Average time for reversal of moderate block was 1.69 min (SD, 0.81) in patients pretreated with MgSO4 and 1.76 min (1.13) in those pretreated with placebo (P = 0.897). Average time for reversal of deep block was 1.77 min (0.83) in patients pretreated with MgSO4 and 1.98 min (0.58) in those pretreated with placebo (P = 0.572). Times to final T1 were longer compared with times to normalized train-of-four ratio 0.9, without any difference between patients pretreated with MgSO4 or placebo. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with a single intravenous dose of MgSO4 60 mg/kg does not decrease the efficacy of recommended doses of sugammadex for the reversal of a moderate and deep neuromuscular block induced by an intubation dose of rocuronium.

[Effective reversal of muscle relaxation by rocuronium using sugammadex in a patient with myasthenia gravis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

As myasthenia gravis affects neuromuscular transmission, these patients show various responses to neuromuscular blocking drugs. We report a successful use of the sugammadex in a myasthenic patient to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. A 69-year-old woman was scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and total of rocuronium 20 mg was administered. After spontaneous recovery of T1, we administered sugammadex 200mg intravenously, reversing neuromuscular blockade to a train-of-four ratio (T4/T1) of 100% within 30 sec. Sugammadex can be used to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients with myasthenia gravis, thereby avoiding the need for reversal with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Sugammadex for the reversal of muscle relaxation in general anaesthesia: a systematic review and economic assessment.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex (Bridion) is a newly developed agent for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by rocuronium or vecuronium. Sugammadex can reverse profound blockade and can be given for immediate reversal and its use would avoid the potentially serious adverse effects of the currently used agent, succinylcholine. Also, sugammadex can reverse NMB more quickly and predictably than existing agents. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sugammadex for the reversal of muscle relaxation after general anaesthesia in UK practice following routine or rapid induction of NMB. DATA SOURCES: Medical databases [including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, BIOSIS and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), conference proceedings, internet sites and clinical trials registers] were searched to identify published and unpublished studies. The main searches were carried out in May 2008 and supplemented by current awareness updates up until November 2008. REVIEW METHODS: For the clinical effectiveness review, randomised controlled trials of sugammadex against placebo or an active comparator (neostigmine + glycopyrrolate) for the reversal of moderate or profound NMB and for immediate reversal (spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine-induced blockade) were included. The primary effectiveness outcome was speed of recovery from NMB, as measured by objective monitoring of neuromuscular function. For the cost-effectiveness review, a de novo economic assessment considered the routine induction of NMB and the rapid induction and/or reversal of NMB, and threshold analyses were carried out on a series of pairwise comparisons to establish how effective sugammadex needs to be to justify its cost. RESULTS: The review of clinical effectiveness included four randomised active-control trials of sugammadex, nine randomised placebo-controlled trials and five studies in special populations. A total of 2132 titles and abstracts and 265 full-text publications were screened. The included trials indicated that sugammadex produces more rapid recovery from moderate or profound NMB than placebo or neostigmine. Median time to recovery from moderate blockade was 1.3-1.7 minutes for rocuronium + sugammadex, 21-86 minutes for rocuronium + placebo and 17.6 minutes for rocuronium + neostigmine. In profound blockade, median time to recovery was 2.7 minutes for rocuronium + sugammadex, 30 to > 90 minutes for rocuronium + placebo, and 49 minutes for rocuronium + neostigmine. Results for vecuronium were similar. In addition, recovery from NMB was faster with rocuronium reversed by sugammadex 16 mg/kg after 3 minutes (immediate reversal) than with succinylcholine followed by spontaneous recovery (median time to primary outcome 4.2 versus 7.1 minutes). The evidence base for modelling cost-effectiveness is very limited. However, assuming that the reductions in recovery times seen in the trials can be achieved in routine practice and can be used productively, sugammadex [2 mg/kg (4 mg/kg)] is potentially cost-effective at its current list price for the routine reversal of rocuronium-induced moderate (profound) blockade, if each minute of recovery time saved can be valued at approximately 2.40 pounds (1.75 pounds) or more. This is more likely to be achieved if any reductions in recovery time are in the operating room (estimated value of 4.44 pounds per minute saved) rather than the recovery room (estimated value of 0.33 pounds per minute saved). The results were broadly similar for rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced blockade. For rapid reversal of NMB it appeared that any reduction in morbidity from adopting sugammadex is unlikely to result in significant cost savings. LIMITATIONS: The evidence base was not large and many of the published trials were dose-finding and safety studies with very small sample sizes. Also, some relevant outcomes, in particular patient experience/quality of life and resources/costs used, were either not investigated or not reported. In addition, it is likely that the patients included in the efficacy trials were relatively young and in good general health compared with the overall surgical population. Regarding the economic evaluation, there appears to be no evidence linking measures of clinical efficacy to patients' health-related quality of life and mortality risks. CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex may be a cost-effective option compared with neostigmine + glycopyrrolate for reversal of moderate NMB and also provides the facility to recover patients from profound blockade. Rocuronium + sugammadex could be considered as a replacement for succinylcholine for rapid induction (and reversal) of NMB, although this may not be a cost-effective option in some types of patient at current list prices for sugammadex. Considerable uncertainties remain about whether the full benefits of sugammadex can be realised in clinical practice.

[Pharmacology of sugammadex]. / Pharmacologie du sugammadex.

Sugammadex is a new molecule derived from a known pharmacological class : the cyclodextrins known and used in human for many years. It was recently demonstrated that cyclodextrins could encapsulate and bind strongly steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents. Among cyclodextrins gamma-cyclodextrins proved to be more efficient. The binding of cyclodextrins to rocuronium and compound's water solubility was greatly improved by addition of 8 side chains to glycopyranoses units and the presence of a negative charge to the end of these side-chains. Animal studies have clearly demonstrated that sugammadex is faster in onset than anticholinesterase agents and is specific of steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents. It cannot reverse neuromuscular block induced by succinylcholine or benzylisoquinolines such as atracurium or cisatracurium. In human, the dose of sugammadex required to reverse shallow block is 2 mg/kg approximately whereas 4 mg/kg is needed to reverse deep level of neuromuscular block with a few responses at the post tetanic count at the adductor pollicis. The use of sugammadex was not associated with recurrence of block when an adequate dose was administered.

Skin reactions to intradermal neuromuscular blocking agent injections: a randomized multicenter trial in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Numerous reports confirm the performance of intradermal tests for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis during anesthesia; however, there is controversy over their diagnostic value regarding the newer neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs). METHODS: One hundred eleven healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive intradermal injections of two NMBAs, at five increasing concentrations. A concentration was considered as a reactive concentration when it led to a positive reaction in more than 5% of the subjects. These concentrations were compared with the maximal concentration recommended for the diagnosis of sensitization to NMBAs. RESULTS: The maximal nonreactive concentrations were 10 m for suxamethonium; 10 m for pancuronium, vecuronium, rocuronium, and cisatracurium; and 10 m for atracurium and mivacurium. Except for mivacurium, these nonreactive concentrations were close to the maximal concentrations used for the diagnosis of sensitization against NMBAs. For mivacurium, the nonreactive concentrations were higher than the maximal concentration currently recommended in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The aminosteroidal NMBAs pancuronium, vecuronium, and rocuronium and the benzylisoquinoline cisatracurium have a similar potency to induce a nonspecific skin reactivity. If the criteria for positivity and the maximal concentrations of the commercially available compounds recommended by French practice guidelines are used, the risk of false-positive results is limited, and only minor modifications of these recommendations could be suggested. A slight reduction in the maximal concentration used for rocuronium from 1:100 to 1:200 and an increase from 1:1,000 to 1:200 for mivacurium can be proposed.

Role of cholinesterase activity on pharmacodynamics of mivacurium preceded by pancuronium in elderly and young adults.

Mivacurium- pancuronium combination proved to be more potent than either drug given alone. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combination in elderly group and its correlation to plasma butyryl cholinesterase (Bche) activity. Forty patients, ASA I or II scheduled for elective open cholecystectomy were allocated into two groups of twenty patients each: young group (18- 55 years) and elderly group (60-75 years). Anesthesia was induced with midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol then maintained with isoflurane and opioid supplementation. Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) was monitored by train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve. After calibration, NMB was achieved by 16 microg kg(-1) pancuronium followed by 32 microg kg(-1) mivacurium. The following parameters were recorded: The onset time, clinical duration, recovery index and the total dose of mivacurium and pancuronium together with hemodynamic data. Three blood samples for Bche activity were collected: before pancuronium injection, 3 min. and 30 min. afterwards in both groups. The onset time and the recovery index of NMB were comparable in both groups. The duration of action was significantly prolonged in elderly group (49.8 +/- 10.48 min.) compared to young one (37.13 +/- 7.81 min.). The total dose of mivacurium was significantly less in the elderly group (22.56 +/- 2.39 microg kg(-1) hr(-1)) when compared to the young group (25.78 +/- 3.05 microg kg(-1) hr(-1)). For all patients, the preoperative Bche activity was within the normal range. After pancuronium injecttion, it showed a significant reduction in both groups at three and thirty minutes except a non significant value in young at thirty minutes. This reduction showed a significantly higher percent change in the elderly group (30.37 +/- 22.01) than the young group (8.60 +/- 19.19) at thirty minutes. There were significant intra operative variations in the percent changes of hemodynamic data compared to the preoperative values, yet, still within the clinically acceptable range. So, the use of a small dose of pancuronium followed by a small dose of mivacurium with a ratio of 1:2 can produce synergism without affecting either the recovery profile of mivacurium or the clinical hemodynamic stability even in the elderly group.

Prolonged (more than ten hours) neuromuscular blockade after cardiac surgery: report of two cases.

PURPOSE: We examine two cases of prolonged neuromuscular blockade (NMB) after cardiac surgery. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first reported cases of complete paralysis lasting more than ten hours after surgery. CLINICAL FEATURES: We attribute the extended durations of NMB (more than ten hours) to high doses of NMB drugs in combination with magnesium sulphate and moderate renal failure. Advanced age, hepatic disease, aminoglycoside exposure, hypocalcemia, and possible interaction between rocuronium and pancuronium may have played minor roles. CONCLUSION: We should avoid administering large doses of NMB agents, even in the context of planned postoperative ventilation. If NMB is not monitored intraoperatively in patients who are at risk of prolonged NMB, then train-of-four response should be measured in the intensive care unit. Adequate sedation should be provided until proper recovery of neuromuscular function is documented.

Ventajas del uso de dosis de cebado / Advantages of the use of priming doses

Introducción: En la práctica clínica se han ensayado diversas formas de administrar los relajantes muculares con vistas a lograr menores tiempos y mejores condiciones de intubación. Objetivos: Determinar las condiciones y el tiempo de intubación que se lograron al utilizar el principio de dosis de cebado en los pacientes quirúrgicos, y evaluar los valores de la altura del twicht en ese período. Material y método: Se realizó una investigación tipo ensayo clínico en 120 pacientes sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica, subdivididos en 2 grupos. La técnica de dosis de cebado se realizó en 60 pacientes. Los relajantes musculares utilizados fueron: pancuronio (Grupo I) dosis de 0,1 mg/kg, vecuronio (Grupo II) 0,1 mg/kg y atracurio (Grupo III) 0,5 mg/kg. A los pacientes de este grupo se les administró el 10 por ciento de la dosis total calculada en los 4 minutos previos a la administración de la dosis restante. Resultados: Al monitorizar la FNM durante la intubación se observó que el tiempo óptimo de intubación, cuando se utilizaron dosis de cebado con atracurio y vecuronio, fue de 112,12 ñ 3,2 y 118ñ1,4 seg. respectivamente, menores al del grupo pancuronio. Las condiciones de intubación obtenidas según los criterios de Lund y Stouner presentaron un 95 por ciento de condiciones excelentes en los grupos II y III y un 60 por ciento en el grupo I. La altura del twitch en igual período fue semejante para los grupos II y III. Al usar dosis de cebado fue de 28,5 ñ 3,1 y 33,1 ñ 0,8 por ciento respectivamente y de 48,1 ñ 1,5 y 49,1 ñ 2,6 por ciento cuando ésta no se utilizó. Estas diferencias resultaron ser estadísticamente significativas (p<0,05). Como consecuencia de esta técnica, en el Grupo II se encontraron, en un 10 por ciento del total, dificultades para respirar y otro 10 por ciento refirió experiencia subjetiva de parálisis respiratoria y en el 20 por ciento del Grupo III se observaron dificultades respiratorias. Tres pacientes del Grupo I y dos de cada Grupo II y III presentaron diplopia. Conclusiones: Las condiciones de intubación fueron más rápidas cuando se empleó dosis de cebado para los tres fármacos, que cuando no se la utilizó. La laringoscopía y la intubación tuvieron mejores condiciones con los fármacos de acción intermedia (vecuronio y atracurio). La altura del twitch disminuyó más cuando se emplearon dosis de cebado en los tres fármacos que cuando no se utilizaron...(AU)

Choice of the muscle relaxant for rapid-sequence induction.

Muscle relaxants are given as part of a rapid-sequence induction to facilitate tracheal intubation. Among all the muscle relaxants available, succinylcholine is the only one with a fast (approximately equal to 1 min) onset and a fast recovery. Therefore it is still the most frequently used muscle relaxant for rapid-sequence induction despite its well-known side-effects. The short duration of action of succinylcholine is, however, no substitute for aggressive airway management in the case of an unexpectedly difficult intubation in order to prevent life-threatening hypoxia. A preoperative assessment of the airway is mandatory in any patient and may indicate the need for using intubation techniques without a muscle relaxant. Rocuronium in large doses (i.e. > or = 1 mg kg-1) is an alternative to succinylcholine in a classical rapid-sequence setting under relatively light anaesthesia. With respect to rapid tracheal intubation, the timing and priming principles offer little advantage over the use of rocuronium in doses of 0.6 mg kg-1 in combination with an appropriate induction technique (i.e. including an opioid) or over the use of larger doses of rocuronium (> or = 1.0 mg kg-1) under relatively light anaesthesia, and may even be potentially harmful. In contrast to rocuronium, the use of rapacuronium in a rapid-sequence setting has been associated with dose-dependent respiratory side-effects that limit its usefulness in doses higher than 1.5 mg kg-1 for this indication.

[A new toy: upswing in curare use in Spanish anesthesia]. / A new toy: la irrupción del curare en la anestesia española (1946).

The introduction of curare for general anesthesia by Harold Griffith in 1942 was one of the most important moments in the development of anesthesiology. However, several years passed before curare came to be used in Spain. We review the early application of curare and the role played by Robert Macintosh, Professor of Anaesthesia at Oxford, in introducing the drug to Spain.

Effect of neuromuscular blockade on oxygen consumption and energy expenditure in sedated, mechanically ventilated children.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effects of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on energy expenditure for intubated, mechanically ventilated, critically ill children. DESIGN: A prospective, unblinded clinical study. Each subject was studied twice, before and after establishment of NMB. SETTING: A tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Critically ill children undergoing mechanical ventilation and receiving ongoing sedation were eligible, if they had a cuffed endotracheal tube and were physiologically stable. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 20 children (age, 1 to 15 yrs) were studied in an unblinded, crossover fashion. All were mechanically ventilated via a cuffed endotracheal tube, with ventilator rate and tidal volume adequate to provide complete ventilation, and F(IO2) <0.6. Absence of gas leak around the endotracheal tube was assured, and all patients were sedated using continuous infusions of midazolam and/or fentanyl; no changes in ventilator settings, nutritional input, or inotropic drug dose were permitted during the study period. Each patient underwent indirect calorimetry immediately before establishment of NMB. NMB was then induced, and indirect calorimetry was repeated. Complete blockade was verified using a peripheral nerve stimulator. In each case, the two sets of measurements were completed within a 1-hr period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data analyzed included identifying and diagnostic information, oxygen consumption, and carbon dioxide production. Energy expenditure was calculated using standard formulas. Oxygen consumption and energy expenditure values obtained before and after the establishment of NMB were compared by using paired Student's t-test. NMB reduced oxygen consumption from 6.54+/-0.49 mL/kg/min to 5.90+/-0.40 ml/kg/min, and energy expenditure was reduced from 46.5+/-3.7 kcal/kg/24 hrs to 41.0+/-2.8 kcal/kg/24 hrs (p < .001 in each case). The reduction in oxygen consumption was 8.7+/-1.7%, and that in energy expenditure 10.3+/-1.8%, of pre-NMB values, respectively. CONCLUSION: NMB significantly reduces oxygen consumption and energy expenditure in critically ill children who are sedated and mechanically ventilated; the degree of reduction is small.