Low Risk of Traumatic Intracranial Hematoma Expansion with Factor Xa Inhibitors without Andexanet Reversal.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa, a novel anticoagulation reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors, was recently approved. Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage presents a prime target for this drug. The Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors study established the efficacy of andexanet alfa in reversing factor Xa inhibitors. However, the association between anticoagulation reversal and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage progression is not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine progression rates of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on factor Xa inhibitors prior to hospitalization who were managed without the use of andexanet alfa. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed between 2016 and 2019 at a single institution. An institutional traumatic brain injury (TBI) registry was queried. Patients with recorded use of apixaban or rivaroxaban <18 hours before injury were included. The primary study outcome was <35% increase in hemorrhage volume or thickness on repeated head computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULTS: We identified 25 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Two patients were excluded because of a lack of necessary CT data. Twelve patients (52%) were receiving apixaban, and 11 were (48%) on rivaroxaban. On admission CT scan, 14 patients had subdural hematoma, 6 had traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and 3 had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Anticoagulation reversal was attempted in 17 patients (74%), primarily using 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. Twenty patients (87%) were adjudicated as having excellent or good hemostasis on repeat imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients on factor Xa inhibitors with complicated mild TBI have a similar intracranial hemorrhage progression rate to patients who are not anticoagulated or anticoagulated with a reversible agent. The hemostatic outcomes in our cohort were similar to those reported after andexanet alfa administration.

Management of epistaxis in patients on novel oral anticoagulation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Individuals on anticoagulation therapy are at increased risk of bleeding, including epistaxis. There is a lack of available reversal agents for novel oral anticoagulation therapy. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the current literature on epistaxis in the context of novel oral anticoagulation use, in order to recommend guidelines on management. METHOD: A comprehensive search of published literature was conducted to identify all relevant articles published up to April 2019. RESULTS: Patients on oral anticoagulation therapy are over-represented in individuals with epistaxis. Those on novel oral anticoagulation therapy were more likely to relapse compared to patients on classic oral anticoagulants or non-anticoagulated patients. Idarucizumab is an effective antidote for bleeding associated with dabigatran use. Recommendations for epistaxis management in patients on novel oral anticoagulation therapy are outlined. CONCLUSION: Clinicians need to be aware of the potential severity of epistaxis and the increased likelihood of recurrence. High-quality studies are required to determine the efficacy and safety of andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, as well as non-specific reversal agents.

Real-world utilization of andexanet alfa.

OBJECTIVE: In 2018, the FDA approved andexanet alfa for the reversal of life-threatening hemorrhages in patients anticoagulated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Yet, cost-effective factor Xa inhibitor reversal remains controversial. The objective of this study was to describe real world utilization of andexanet alfa. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of patients receiving andexanet alfa between July 28, 2018 and April 29, 2019 at a large academic health system. Baseline demographics, anticoagulant type and reversal, as well as brain imaging were collected. Primary endpoints were stability of hematoma for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and hemostatic effectiveness for patients undergoing surgical procedures. Secondary endpoints were thromboembolism and 30 day mortality. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients evaluated, 13 received andexanet alfa for ICH. Eleven of the 13 had follow-up imaging available and stability was observed in 90.9%. Three patients received andexanet alfa for reversal prior to surgical procedures, and 100% hemostatic effectiveness was achieved. Nine patients received andexanet alfa for reversal of extracranial bleeding, including gastrointestinal bleed (n=4). There were no thrombotic events in our cohort, and 30 day mortality was 24%. Sixty-four percent of patients would have met exclusion criteria for the ANNEXA-4 trial. CONCLUSION: This is the largest series to date describing real-world utilization of andexanet alfa. Our series showed hemostatic efficacy in 90.9% of patients with ICH, and 100% in patients undergoing surgical procedures. There were no thrombotic complications. Yet, larger and comparative studies are needed to clarify the optimal agent and patient selection for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors.

Current Strategies for the Management of Bleeding Associated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants and a Review of Investigational Reversal Agents.

BACKGROUND: The management of life-threatening bleeding in patients who are receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a serious medical concern. OBJECTIVE: This review provides a concise, balanced overview of the current and future approaches for reversing the anticoagulation effects of DOACs, particularly factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. DISCUSSION: The anticoagulant activity of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran can be reversed by idarucizumab, but until recently, options for the management of major bleeding in patients who were receiving FXa inhibitors were limited to nonspecific strategies, including supplementation of clotting factors with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) or activated PCCs for attenuating anticoagulation effects. They appear as a treatment option in many hospital guidelines despite the lack of approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the lack of rigorous medical evidence supporting their use in this setting. The development of specific reversal agents may provide improved strategies for the management of bleeding. Andexanet alfa is a modified FXa molecule approved in the United States to reverse the anticoagulant effects of FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Ciraparantag is a small-molecule inhibitor of multiple anticoagulants that has been investigated in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: The current guidelines for management of DOAC-associated bleeding are being updated to reflect that the reversal agent for rivaroxaban and apixaban is now available. For other FXa inhibitors, in the absence of a reversal agent, nonspecific strategies that include PCCs are recommended. The population of patients anticoagulated with DOACs is growing, and we hope that specific reversal agents will improve the approach to management of major bleeding in this population.

A Systematic and Evidence-Based Review of Published and Pending Reports of Andexanet Alfa.

Andexanet alfa is the newly approved factor Xa inhibitor reversal agent for the treatment of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding from apixaban or rivaroxaban. This decoy protein directly binds factor Xa inhibitors reversing their action. A systematic and evidence-based evaluation of the available clinical trials is lacking in the literature. This research will provide a systematic and evidence-based evaluation of published clinical trials for andexanet alfa. It will also present an evaluation of active research. Reports of research were identified through multiple databases using search terms andexanet alfa, andexanet, or PRT064445. The level of evidence and strength of recommendation were accomplished using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy. There are 2 published articles presenting 3 clinical trials. Two trials had a low level of evidence and the third trial, a preliminary report of results, showed a moderate level of evidence. The review of active research found 3 unique studies and a preliminary results study. The level of evidence is low for 2 of these studies, moderate for a third, and potentially high for the fourth. The strength of recommendation for all 6 studies is a C. Four of the studies present disease-oriented evidence resulting in a low level of evidence. Another study is unblinded and uncontrolled but presents patient-oriented evidence resulting in a moderate level of evidence. Only one study could score high because the outcome is patient-oriented evidence, and it could achieve follow-up of 80%. There is a need for well-controlled and blinded evaluation to improve the recommendation strength.

Antidotes for reversal of direct oral anticoagulants.

The main advantage of the direct oral anticoagulants over vitamin K antagonists is reduced rates of major bleeding, especially intracranial hemorrhage. While use of different clotting factor supplements have been used in patients with direct oral anticoagulant induced major bleeding or when there is need for urgent surgery, the lack of preclinical and clinical data are concerning. Idarucizumab is a specific antibody developed with a 350-fold greater affinity for dabigatran than its pharmacologic target thrombin. Andexanet is a modified factor Xa molecule that binds the direct and indirect Xa inhibitors without being enzymatically active. Ciraparantag, has potential to reverse the anticoagulant activity of multiple agents. The pharmacology, preclinical, and clinical data that have developed these specific antidotes are reviewed in this manuscript.

The Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Heart Disease: Section V-Special Situations.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In large clinical trials comparing the NOACs with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were at least as effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, but were associated with less intracranial bleeding. In addition, the NOACs are more convenient to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Consequently, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for these indications, and their use is increasing. Although, as a class, the NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile compared with VKAs, choosing among them is complicated because they have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Therefore, selection depends on the results of the individual trials, renal function, the potential for drug-drug interactions and preference for once- or twice-daily dosing. In addition, several 'special situations' were not adequately studied in the dedicated clinical trials. For these situations, knowledge of the unique pharmacological features of the various NOACs and judicious cross-trial comparison can help inform prescription choices. The purpose of this position article is therefore to help clinicians choose the right anticoagulant for the right patient at the right dose by reviewing a variety of special situations not widely studied in clinical trials.

Strategies of neutralization of the direct oral anticoagulants effect: review of the literature.

Many neutralizing agents of anticoagulant effect of factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors (xabans and dabigatran, respectively) have been developed since the commercialization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2008. Idarucizumab is a specific antidote of dabigatran commercialised since 2016. An antidote of xabans, andexanet-α, was very recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Other antidotes of DOAC are under pre-clinical or clinical development; the most advanced being the aripazine in addition to γ-thrombine S195A and GDFXa-α2M complex. Prothrombin complex concentrates activated or not, are part of the pro-hemostatic agents suggested for DOAC handling in case of haemorrhage or preceeding urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Other pro-hemostatic agents (FXaI16L, FX (a)-C, superFVa) are in pre-clinical stage. The efficacy of these different agents in DOAC reversal and mortality reduction is still controversal in the light of the sparse results of in vitro, ex vivo, pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Andexanet alfa for the treatment of hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: While associated life-threatening and fatal bleeding events are less frequent with the direct factor Xa inhibitors compared to vitamin K antagonists, significant concern surrounding management of major bleeds and urgent periprocedural interruption of these agents exists among clinicians. Andexanet alfa is a recombinant human factor Xa decoy protein developed in response to this clinical gap in the care of patients receiving anticoagulation with factor Xa inhibitors. Areas covered: This paper reviews results from preclinical and healthy-volunteer studies demonstrating the ability of andexanet to rapidly and reliably normalize coagulation indices in patients treated with both direct and indirect factor Xa inhibitors. An interim analysis from an ongoing phase 3/4b clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of andexanet in patients experiencing life-threatening hemorrhage in association with factor Xa inhibitors is discussed. It also provides an overview of the major safety concerns reported in these trials which include allergic and infusion reactions, development of anti-andexanet antibodies and, importantly, thrombosis. Expert commentary: While initial reports on restoration of hemostasis and safety are promising, further study of andexanet is required to gauge its efficacy and toxicity, including a potential prothrombotic effect. Further, its use in patients requiring urgent surgery should be studied.

Andexanet Alfa: First Global Approval.

Intravenous andexanet alfa [coagulation factor Xa (recombinant), inactivated-zhzo; Andexxa®] is a first-in-class recombinant modified factor Xa protein that has been developed by Portola Pharmaceuticals as a universal antidote to reverse anticoagulant effects of direct or indirect factor Xa inhibitors. In May 2018, andexanet alfa received its first global approval in the USA for use in patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban, when reversal of anticoagulant effects is required in life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Intravenous andexanet alfa is under regulatory review in the EU and is undergoing clinical development in Japan. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of andexanet alfa leading to this first global approval for reversing anticoagulation of rivaroxaban and apixaban in adults.

Management of Elective Surgery and Emergent Bleeding with Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review was to offer practical management strategies for when patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants require elective surgery or present with bleeding complications. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical practice guidelines are now available on the timing of periprocedural interruption of treatment with the newer direct oral anticoagulants based on their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and based on findings from cohort studies and clinical trials. An antibody that reverses the effects of dabigatran is now available, and a factor Xa decoy is being developed as an antidote to apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The timing of interruption of direct oral anticoagulants for elective surgery is based on multiple factors, including pharmacologic properties and interactions, the patient's renal function, and the type of planned surgery. There is little role for low-molecular-weight heparin bridging. Idarucizumab is the treatment of choice for dabigatran-related life-threatening bleeding, while andexanet alfa is being developed to reverse factor Xa inhibitors.

The role of new oral anticoagulants in orthopaedics: an update of recent evidence.

Rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban are the four available new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) which are currently approved for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip and knee replacement. Large phase 3 and phase 4 studies comparing NOAC with low molecular weight heparins have shown similar results regarding the efficacy and safety of these two categories of anticoagulants. Management of bleeding complications is a matter of great significance. Three reversal agents have been developed: idarucizumab, andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. Idarucizumab is now commercially available. Regarding the perioperative management of NOAC, two main scientific groups have published their own recommendations. The European Heart Rhythm Association recommends 48-h period of stoppage preoperatively for factor Xa inhibitors and at least 3 or 4 days for dabigatran, while the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends 5-day discontinuation for all NOAC. Conventional clot tests can only be used as rough indicators for laboratory assessment of the activity of NOAC. Specific laboratory tests have been developed for more accurate measurements of NOAC blood levels, including a dilute thrombin time test (Hemoclot test) and the ecarin clot test for dabigatran and chromogenic anti-factor Xa assays for direct factor Xa inhibitors. Due to the beneficial properties of NOAC, these drugs are gaining ground in daily orthopaedic practice, and many studies are being conducted in order to extend the indications of these anticoagulants agents.

[NOAC: Real-life data and the role of antidotes for the treatment of bleeding]. / NOAK: Real-life-Daten und Therapie von Blutungen mit Antidots.

The non-vitamin K antagonists (NOAC) are an integral component of our antithrombotic prevention and therapy. For four of the NOAC, their non-inferiority or even superiority versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) has been proven. Thus, the management of special patient cohorts or the management of active bleeding complications is a focus of current discussion.In addition to prospective trials, numerous retrospective analyses of health insurers or public health provider data have been analyzed and published as "real life" or "real-world evidence" data. In almost all data sets the results of the NOAC approval trials were confirmed, demonstrating their non-inferiority or even superiority versus VKA. Attempts to compare the various NOAC with each other must be viewed critically since the real-world evidence (RWE) analysis provides very divergent results depending on the cohorts analyzed. Thus, a substantial prescriber-bias must be taken into account and never be excluded.In order to improve the management of bleeding complications, NOAC antidotes were developed. While the factors Xa antidote, andexanet alpha, a modified coagulation factor deleted of an intrinsic activity, will not be available before 2018, the dabigatran antidote idarucizumab is already in clinical use. Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment directed against dabigatran, is able to completely antagonize the effect of dabigatran within minutes. Therefore, the drug has the potential to terminate life-threatening bleeding complications earlier and make emergency surgical or interventional procedures possible without an elevated bleeding risk.

Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: a practical approach.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have at least noninferior efficacy compared with other oral anticoagulants and have ancillary benefits, including overall better safety profiles, lack of the need for routine monitoring, rapid onset of action, and ease of administration. Reversal of these agents may be indicated in certain situations such as severe bleeding and for perioperative management. DOAC-associated bleeding should be risk stratified: patients with moderate or severe bleeding should have the DOAC discontinued and reversal strategies should be considered. Laboratory testing has limited utility in the acute management of bleeding; thrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time may be useful for excluding clinically relevant levels of dabigatran. Prothrombin time is potentially useful for rivaroxaban and edoxaban, but calibrated anti-Xa assays are optimal for determining clinically relevant levels of factor Xa inhibitors. Because specific reversal agents are not widely available, supportive care and interventions for local hemostasis remain the cornerstones of therapy in the patient with DOAC-associated bleeding. Nonspecific reversal agents should be considered only in the event of severe bleeding because their efficacy is unknown, and they are associated with risk of thrombosis. Recent results from phase 3/4 studies demonstrate efficacy for an antidote to dabigatran (idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment with specificity for dabigatran) and an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors (andexanet alfa, a recombinant and inactive form of factor Xa that binds inhibitors). A universal reversal agent (ciraparantag) for many anticoagulants, including the DOACs, shows promise in results from phase 1 and 2 studies.

Idarucizumab and factor Xa reversal agents: role in hospital guidelines and protocols.

As expected with all antithrombotic agents, there is a risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) because of the DOAC itself, acute trauma, invasive procedures, or underlying comorbidities. For many bleeding events, a prudent course of action will be to withdraw the DOAC, then "wait and support" the patient, with the expectation that the bleeding event should resolve with time. Likewise, DOAC therapy may be interrupted ahead of a planned procedure, the stopping time being dependent on the agent involved and the patient's renal function. However, urgent reversal of anticoagulation is required in patients with serious or life-threatening bleeding or in those requiring urgent surgery or procedures. Novel specific reversal agents, either under development or recently approved, will need to be incorporated into local anticoagulation reversal protocols. For dabigatran-treated patients, idarucizumab recently has been approved for clinical use in cases of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding or when patients require emergency surgery or urgent procedures, both associated with a high risk of bleeding. As clinical experience with individual specific reversal agents grows, their roles in managing major bleeding events in DOAC-treated patients will become better defined. Future research, as well as ongoing use of idarucizumab, should help establish when it is appropriate to re-dose with idarucizumab, coadminister with prothrombin complex concentrates, or re-initiate DOAC after idarucizumab use. Ongoing trials should help identify the appropriate doses and expected durations of effect for andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, which are likely to vary depending on the individual oral anticoagulants.