High versus low fixed-dose four factor-prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate 4F-PCC is the standard of care for warfarin reversal in patients with major bleed or requiring urgent surgery. Although the 4F-PCC dose is weight and international normalized ratio (INR) based, for practical purposes, a fixed-dose approach has been explored, especially for rapid reversal. We report our experience using two different fixed-dose 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal in patients presenting with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We completed a retrospective chart review comparing high (4000 units) versus low (2000 units) dose 4F-PCC by evaluating patient characteristics, laboratory data, and pre-and post-4F-PCC brain imaging. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between patient characteristics or INR correction (≤1.5) between the two groups. Eighty percent (12/15) of patients who received the low dose 4F-PCC had either improved or stable brain imaging as compared to 88% (14/16) of patients who received the high dose PCC. When the eight patients (4 from each arm of the study) who required neurosurgery were excluded, only two patients in each arm had worse imaging after 4F-PCC. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the INR correction and the brain imaging changes in patients with an ICH who received either the high or the low fixed-dose 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal.

Nonfactor Therapies: New Approaches to Prophylactic Treatment of Haemophilia.

For several decades, the treatment of haemophilia has relied on factor replacement therapy, which restores haemostasis by replacing the missing coagulation factor. In recent years, novel alternative therapies for the treatment of haemophilia in patients with and without inhibitors have been developed. These emergent therapies promote haemostasis by mimicking coagulation factors or inhibiting natural anticoagulants. They provide a less invasive route of administration (i.e. subcutaneous) and some offer reduced frequency of dosing (i.e. every 2 weeks, monthly) compared with the majority of factor replacement therapies, and thus have the potential to simplify treatment, increase adherence and subsequently improve outcomes for patients. Their introduction has transformed the care of haemophilia patients with inhibitors to factor VIII, with similar expectation for haemophilia B patients with inhibitors. However, these therapies also come with several new challenges including their limitation to prophylactic treatment, the observed increased incidence of thrombosis, or their impact on the natural history of the disease and potential disruption of existing treatment guidelines like the use of immune tolerance induction. Moreover, questions remain regarding the long-term impact of non-replacement therapies on joint health as well as the optimal strategy to manage breakthrough bleeds in patients with inhibitors.

Treatment of adults with intracranial hemorrhage on apixaban or rivaroxaban with prothrombin complex concentrate products.

To analyze the efficacy and safety of activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) to prevent hematoma expansion in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In this multicenter, retrospective study, sixty-seven ICH patients who received aPCC or 4F-PCC for known use of apixaban or rivaroxaban between February 2014 and September 2018 were included. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved excellent/good or poor hemostasis after administration of aPCC or 4F-PCC. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, thromboembolic events during admission, and transfusion requirements. Excellent/good hemostasis was achieved in 87% of aPCC patients, 89% of low-dose 4F-PCC [< 30 units per kilogram (kg)], and 89% of high-dose 4F-PCC (≥ 30 units per kg). There were no significant differences in excellent/good or poor hemostatic efficacy (p = 0.362). No differences were identified in transfusions 6 h prior (p = 0.087) or 12 h after (p = 0.178) the reversal agent. Mortality occurred in five patients, with no differences among the groups (p = 0.838). There were no inpatient thromboembolic events. Both aPCC and 4F-PCC appear safe and equally associated with hematoma stability in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban who present with ICH. Prospective studies are needed to identify a superior reversal agent when comparing andexanet alfa to hospital standard of care (4F-PCC or aPCC) and to further explore the optimal dosing strategy for patients with ICH associated with apixaban or rivaroxaban use.

Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased with continued evidence of their efficacy and ease of use. However, the rise in their utilization also surfaced a concern regarding their reversal in patients actively bleeding and/or those requiring invasive procedures. Up until 2018, there were several reversal options available including 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-factor PCC), activated charcoal, desmopressin, and tranexamic acid. Then, in 2018, andexanet alpha, a recombinant factor Xa, was approved for the reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Nonetheless, because 4-factor PCC is more easily attainable and cost-effective, it continues to be the more favorable option for many health-care professionals. METHODS: This retrospective chart review was conducted at NYU Winthrop Hospital in patients who received 4-factor PCC for the reversal of DOACs from January 2018 to July 2018. Patient charts were reviewed and relevant data was collected (admitting diagnosis, dose of 4-factor PCC utilized, etc). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were evaluated with 85% experiencing a positive response and complete recovery following the administration of 4-factor PCC; 8 (15%) patients died after receiving 4-factor PCC, none as a result of its administration; 3 patients died secondary to other underlying comorbidities, 4 patients died due to an intracranial hemorrhage, and 1 died due to hematoma of the tongue. CONCLUSION: Based on the results thus far, the use of 4-factor PCC may be a good treatment option in patients requiring DOAC reversal.

Emergent reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding first-line use of the recently approved reversal agent andexanet alfa due to limitations of the ANEXXA-4 study, thrombotic risks, and high medication acquisition cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 4F-PCC for the reversal of emergent oral fXa inhibitor-related bleeding. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate a subgroup using strict ANNEXA-4 patient selection criteria. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted utilizing chart review of adult patients that received 4F-PCC for oral fXa inhibitor-related bleeding. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinical success defined as achieving excellent or good hemostatic effectiveness following the administration of 4F-PCC. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality and arterial/venous thromboembolism, and cost compared with andexanet alfa. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were included, with 83 patients in the ANNEXA-4 criteria subgroup. Eighty-five of the 119 patients (71%) required reversal due to intracranial bleeding. Prior to reversal, 70 patients (59%) were taking apixaban and 49 patients (41%) were taking rivaroxaban. Clinical success was achieved in 106 of 119 patients (89%) and 74 of 83 patients (90%) in the strict criteria subgroup. Three of 119 patients (2.5%) had a thrombotic event during hospital stay and the overall mortality rate was 13%. The average cost increase of andexanet alfa compared to 4F-PCC would have been $29,500 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 4F-PCC for the reversal of oral fXa inhibitors was effective with relatively low thrombotic risk. Further direct prospective comparison of 4F-PCC to andexanet alfa is warranted.

Low Risk of Traumatic Intracranial Hematoma Expansion with Factor Xa Inhibitors without Andexanet Reversal.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa, a novel anticoagulation reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors, was recently approved. Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage presents a prime target for this drug. The Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors study established the efficacy of andexanet alfa in reversing factor Xa inhibitors. However, the association between anticoagulation reversal and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage progression is not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine progression rates of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on factor Xa inhibitors prior to hospitalization who were managed without the use of andexanet alfa. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed between 2016 and 2019 at a single institution. An institutional traumatic brain injury (TBI) registry was queried. Patients with recorded use of apixaban or rivaroxaban <18 hours before injury were included. The primary study outcome was <35% increase in hemorrhage volume or thickness on repeated head computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULTS: We identified 25 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Two patients were excluded because of a lack of necessary CT data. Twelve patients (52%) were receiving apixaban, and 11 were (48%) on rivaroxaban. On admission CT scan, 14 patients had subdural hematoma, 6 had traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and 3 had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Anticoagulation reversal was attempted in 17 patients (74%), primarily using 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. Twenty patients (87%) were adjudicated as having excellent or good hemostasis on repeat imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients on factor Xa inhibitors with complicated mild TBI have a similar intracranial hemorrhage progression rate to patients who are not anticoagulated or anticoagulated with a reversible agent. The hemostatic outcomes in our cohort were similar to those reported after andexanet alfa administration.

Factor Xa Inhibitor-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage: Results From a Multicenter, Observational Cohort Receiving Prothrombin Complex Concentrates.

BACKGROUND: Since the approval of the oral factor Xa inhibitors, there have been concerns regarding the ability to neutralize their anticoagulant effects after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Multiple guidelines suggest using prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) in these patients on the basis of research that includes a limited number of patients with ICH. Given this, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PCCs for factor Xa inhibitor-related ICH in a large, multicenter cohort of patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with apixaban- or rivaroxaban-related ICH who received PCCs between January 1, 2015, and March 1, 2019. The study had 2 primary analysis groups: safety and hemostatic efficacy. The safety analysis evaluated all patients meeting inclusion criteria for the occurrence of a thrombotic event, which were censored at hospital discharge or 30 days after PCC administration. Patients with intracerebral, subarachnoid, or subdural hemorrhages who had at least 1 follow-up image within 24 hours of PCC administration were assessed for hemostatic efficacy. The primary efficacy outcome was the percentage of patients with excellent or good hemostasis on the basis of the modified Sarode criteria. Secondary outcomes included an evaluation of in-hospital mortality, length of stay, infusion-related reactions, and thrombotic event occurrence during multiple predefined periods. RESULTS: A total of 663 patients were included and assessed for safety outcomes. Of these, 433 patients met criteria for hemostatic efficacy evaluation. We observed excellent or good hemostasis in 354 patients (81.8% [95% CI, 77.9-85.2]). Twenty-five (3.8%) patients had a total of 26 thrombotic events, of which 22 occurred in the first 14 days after PCC administration. One patient had documentation of an infusion-related reaction. For the full cohort of patients, in-hospital mortality was 19.0%, and the median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 2.0 and 6.0 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of PCCs after apixaban- and rivaroxaban-related ICH provided a high rate of excellent or good hemostasis (81.8%) coupled with a 3.8% thrombosis rate. Randomized, controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of PCCs in patients with factor Xa inhibitor-related ICH are needed.

Current Strategies for the Management of Bleeding Associated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants and a Review of Investigational Reversal Agents.

BACKGROUND: The management of life-threatening bleeding in patients who are receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a serious medical concern. OBJECTIVE: This review provides a concise, balanced overview of the current and future approaches for reversing the anticoagulation effects of DOACs, particularly factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. DISCUSSION: The anticoagulant activity of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran can be reversed by idarucizumab, but until recently, options for the management of major bleeding in patients who were receiving FXa inhibitors were limited to nonspecific strategies, including supplementation of clotting factors with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) or activated PCCs for attenuating anticoagulation effects. They appear as a treatment option in many hospital guidelines despite the lack of approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the lack of rigorous medical evidence supporting their use in this setting. The development of specific reversal agents may provide improved strategies for the management of bleeding. Andexanet alfa is a modified FXa molecule approved in the United States to reverse the anticoagulant effects of FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Ciraparantag is a small-molecule inhibitor of multiple anticoagulants that has been investigated in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: The current guidelines for management of DOAC-associated bleeding are being updated to reflect that the reversal agent for rivaroxaban and apixaban is now available. For other FXa inhibitors, in the absence of a reversal agent, nonspecific strategies that include PCCs are recommended. The population of patients anticoagulated with DOACs is growing, and we hope that specific reversal agents will improve the approach to management of major bleeding in this population.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate before Urgent Surgery in Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban and Apixaban.

INTRODUCTION: Patients treated with direct Xa inhibitors may require urgent surgery. Administration of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in this setting is common; however, it is based on limited experience in healthy volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the population receiving PCC for apixaban/rivaroxaban reversal prior to an urgent surgery and evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in 2 tertiary hospitals. Bleeding was evaluated based on surgical reports, hemoglobin drop, and the use of blood products or additional PCC during 48 h. Safety measures were thrombotic complications and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients aged 80.7 ± 9 years, treated with apixaban (39.63%) or rivaroxaban (23.37%), received PCC before an urgent surgery/procedure. Most underwent abdominal operation (61%), orthopedic surgery (13%), or transhepatic cholecystostomy insertion (10%). Bleeding during surgery was reported in 3 patients (5%), no patient required additional PCC, and 16 patients (26%) received packed cells (median: 1 unit, range: 1-5). The 30-day mortality and thrombosis rates were 21% (n = 13) and 3% (n = 2), respectively. The cause of death was related to the primary disease, most commonly sepsis. No patient died due to bleeding/thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of PCC to achieve hemostasis in patients treated with Xa inhibitors prior to an urgent surgery.

O acesso global e nacional ao tratamento da hemofilia: reflexões da bioética crítica sobre exclusão em saúde / Global and national access to the treatment of hemophilia: reflections from critical bioethics on health exclusion / El acceso global y nacional al tratamiento de la hemofilia: reflexiones de la bioética crítica sobre exclusión en salud

A hemofilia é uma doença rara, hereditária e caracterizada pela falta de fatores de coagulação, o que provoca sangramentos espontâneos e artropatias incapacitantes. O componente mais dispendioso em seu tratamento é a reposição do fator de coagulação. O presente ensaio examina, a partir da perspectiva da Bioética Crítica, modelo teórico baseado na articulação da Teoria Crítica com os Estudos da Colonialidade, o panorama do acesso global ao tratamento e o programa brasileiro. Demonstrou-se um quadro marcado por extremas disparidades de acesso em nível tanto global quanto nacional, cujas causas estão diretamente relacionadas com a formação histórica de um sistema-mundo baseado na dominação dos meios materiais, ideias e instituições pelos países centrais. Para seu enfrentamento, concluiu-se pela necessidade de contínuas pressões sociais, estímulo a uma produção científica e regulação tecnológica verdadeiramente comprometida com o cumprimento do direito fundamental à saúde.(AU)

Hemophilia is a rare, hereditary disease characterized by a lack of clotting factors, which causes spontaneous bleeding and disabling arthropathy. The most expensive component in its treatment is clotting factor replacement therapy. This essay examines, based on the perspective of Critical Bioethics - a theoretical model based on the articulation between Critical Theory and Coloniality Studies -, the panorama related to the global access to that treatment and the Brazilian program. A scenario marked by extreme disparities of access was found, both in the global and in the national levels, whose causes are directly related to the historical formation of a world system based on the domination of material means, ideas and institutions by central countries. To face this situation, a continuous social pressure is needed, as well as incentive to scientific production and technological regulation truly committed to the enforcement of the fundamental right to health.(AU)

La hemofilia es una enfermedad rara, hereditaria, caracterizada por la falta de factores de coagulación, lo que provoca sangrados espontáneos y artropatías discapacitantes. El componente más caro de su tratamiento es la reposición del factor de coagulación. El presente ensayo examina, a partir de la perspectiva de la Bioética Crítica, un modelo teórico basado en la articulación de la Teoría Crítica con los Estudios de la Colonialidad, el panorama del acceso global al tratamiento y el programa brasileño. Demostró ser un cuadro marcado por disparidades extremas de acceso, tanto en nivel global como nacional, cuyas causas están directamente relacionadas con la formación histórica de un sistema de mundo basado en la dominación de los medios materiales, ideas e instituciones por los países centrales. La conclusión para enfrentarlo fue la necesidad de continuas presiones sociales y estímulo a una producción científica y regulación tecnológica verdaderamente comprometidas con el cumplimiento del derecho fundamental a la salud.(AU)

[Acute treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage]. / Akutbehandlung der intrazerebralen Blutung.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) represents one of the most severe forms of stroke with high morbidity and mortality; however, effective treatment options to significantly improve patient outcome do not exist so far. OBJECTIVE: This review article evaluates the most recent developments in acute ICH treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis and interpretation of currently available evidence regarding ICH treatment, focusing on the most important studies from the last 3 years. RESULTS: Hematoma enlargement, perhaps the most important prognostic factor, should be counteracted by aggressive blood pressure management (targeted systolic pressure 140 mm Hg). In cases of ICH under oral anticoagulation, inhibition of coagulation must be immediately antagonized: vitamin K antagonists with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC), idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet if available or high-dose PCC for factor Xa inhibitors. Currently, surgical treatment strategies, both open and minimally invasive, to evacuate the hematoma can currently not be routinely recommended. In patients with intraventricular ICH, treatment with intraventricular fibrinolysis with or without additional lumbar drainage represents a promising treatment option. CONCLUSION: In recent years, several randomized controlled and observational studies have generated robust evidence regarding ICH treatment; however, there is still no single breakthrough intervention, which significantly improves patient functional outcome. Nevertheless, the sum of various, possibly interacting treatment concepts may potentially improve outcome after ICH.

[Management of bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulants: update on reversal strategies]. / Manejo de hemorragia asociada a anticoagulantes orales directos: estado actual de las estrategias de reversión.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have at least comparable efficacy as vitamin K antagonists along with a better safety profile, reflected by a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Specific reversal agents have been developed in recent years. Namely, idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, is currently approved in most countries. Andexanet, which reverses factor Xa inhibitors, has been recently approved by the FDA, and ciraparantag, a universal antidote targeted to reverse all DOACs, is still under investigation. In this review we provide an update on the pharmacology of DOACs, the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with their use, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect and the reversal strategies in case of DOAC-associated bleeding.

Effect of low and moderate dose FEIBA to reverse major bleeding in patients on direct oral anticoagulants.

OBJECTIVE: Management of acute, major or life threatening bleeding in the presence of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is unclear. In the absence of a specific antidote, or in situations where there is a need for adjunctive therapy, the ideal prothrombin complex concentrate and dose is unclear. The goal of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of our reduced dosing strategy with FEIBA in patients experiencing a DOAC-related bleeding event. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with FEIBA for a DOAC-related bleeding event. SETTING: Academic medical center PATIENTS: Consecutive patients between May 2011 and April 2017 receiving FEIBA for a DOAC-related bleed INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTS: Of the 64 patients included in this analysis, 38 patients received low dose FEIBA (mean 10.0 ±â€¯3.6 units/kg) and 26 received moderate dose (mean 24.3 ±â€¯2.1 units/kg) FEIBA; an additional dose was requested in 6 patients. Six dabigatran patients received idarucizumab. 30 day event rates included 5 thromboembolic events (8%) and 9 (14%) patients expired. Follow-up CT-imaging for ICH, endoscopy/colonoscopy, or interventional radiology exams did not reveal any clinically concerning active bleeding or hematoma expansion except in 2 ICH patients with slight expansion between imaging sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Low (<20 units/kg) to moderate (20-30 units/kg) doses of FEIBA, with the option for a repeat dose, may be an effective management strategy for obtaining hemostasis in DOAC-related major bleeding events.

Manejo de hemorragia asociada a anticoagulantes orales directos: estado actual de las estrategias de reversión / Management of bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulants: update on reversal strategies

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have at least comparable efficacy as vitamin K antagonists along with a better safety profile, reflected by a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Specific reversal agents have been developed in recent years. Namely, idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, is currently approved in most countries. Andexanet, which reverses factor Xa inhibitors, has been recently approved by the FDA, and ciraparantag, a universal antidote targeted to reverse all DOACs, is still under investigation. In this review we provide an update on the pharmacology of DOACs, the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with their use, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect and the reversal strategies in case of DOAC-associated bleeding.

Alternative treatment options for pediatric hemophilia B patients with high-responding inhibitors: A thrombin generation-guided study.

Little is known about the challenging treatment of pediatric patients with hemophilia B and inhibitors due to disease rarity. We describe three patients diagnosed in childhood and followed up to 9 years. All three had allergic reactions to Factor IX, but two were later safely treated for bleeding episodes with activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC = FEIBA). The third was given only recombinant activated Factor VIIa. Based on ex vivo thrombin generation analysis, a new alternative treatment of combined bypassing agents was administered for bleeding episodes and several minor surgical procedures with no treatment-associated adverse events or thrombosis.

In vitro efficacy of pro- and anticoagulant strategies in compensated and acutely ill patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A simultaneous decline in pro- and anticoagulant drivers in patients with liver diseases results in a "rebalanced" haemostatic system, even in acutely ill patients. Nevertheless, both bleeding and thrombotic events are common. Here, we explored efficacy of pro- and antihaemostatic strategies in compensated and acutely ill cirrhotics which may be unpredictable given the profound haemostatic changes. METHODS: We tested the effects in vitro of the addition of clinically relevant doses of commonly used pro- and antihaemostatic strategies in plasma from healthy individuals (n = 30) and patients with compensated (n = 18) and acutely decompensated cirrhosis (n = 18), and acute-on-chronic liver failure (n = 10). We used thrombin generation tests and fibrin clot permeability assays to assess potency of various approaches. RESULTS: Fresh frozen plasma and recombinant factor VIIa modestly increased thrombin generation (10%-20%). Prothrombin complex concentrate increased thrombin generation two-fold in controls and 2-4-fold in patients. Clot permeability decreased after addition of fibrinogen concentrate by 51% in controls and by 50%-60% in patients. Low molecular weight heparin decreased thrombin generation by 18% in controls and by 23%-54% in patients. Similarly, dabigatran decreased thrombin generation by 33% in controls and by 47%-100% in patients. In contrast, rivaroxaban decreased thrombin generation by 55% in controls, but only by 11%-38% in patients. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data suggest little prohaemostatic effect of fresh frozen plasma and recombinant factor VIIa in acutely ill cirrhotics, whereas prothrombin complex concentrate and fibrinogen concentrate clearly improved haemostasis. Furthermore, our data suggest the requirement for dose adjustments of commonly used anticoagulants in these patients.