Lesson of the month 1: Acute flecainide overdose and the potential utility of lipid emulsion therapy.

Lipid-emulsion therapy (Intralipid®) has been advocated as a potential treatment for the management of cardio-toxicity arising from lipid-soluble drugs, particularly those acting upon sodium channels. This, on the basis of a number of ex vivo studies and animal models, suggests that partitioning a drug into lipid could alter its pharmacokinetics and result in significant clinical improvements. Its subsequent use in clinical case series has been seen as confirmation of this mechanism of action. While there are undoubtedly instances where lipid emulsion therapy has been associated with a desirable outcome in humans, as described in this case report, clinicians are reminded that they should not attribute causality, on this basis alone.

Electrophysiological and haemodynamic effects of vernakalant and flecainide in dyssynchronous canine hearts.

AIMS: About one-third of patients with mild dyssynchronous heart failure suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF). Drugs that convert AF to sinus rhythm may further slowdown ventricular conduction. We aimed to investigate the electrophysiological and haemodynamic effects of vernakalant and flecainide in a canine model of chronic left bundle branch block (LBBB). METHODS AND RESULTS: Left bundle branch block was induced in 12 canines. Four months later, vernakalant or flecainide was administered using a regime, designed to achieve clinically used plasma concentrations of the drugs, n = 6 for each drug. Epicardial electrical contact mapping showed that both drugs uniformly prolonged myocardial conduction time. Vernakalant increased QRS width significantly less than flecainide (17 ± 13 vs. 34 ± 15%, respectively). Nevertheless, both drugs equally decreased LVdP/dtmax by ∼15%, LVdP/dtmin by ∼10%, and left ventricular systolic blood pressure by ∼5% (P = n.s. between drugs). CONCLUSIONS: Vernakalant prolongs ventricular conduction less than flecainide, but both drugs had a similar, moderate negative effect on ventricular contractility and relaxation. Part of these reductions seems to be related to the increase in dyssynchrony.

Translation of flecainide- and mexiletine-induced cardiac sodium channel inhibition and ventricular conduction slowing from nonclinical models to clinical.

INTRODUCTION: Nonclinical in vivo models used for cardiovascular safety testing have not previously been studied for their sensitivity for detection of conduction slowing resulting from cardiac sodium channel block. The goal of this study was to examine the sensitivity of in vivo models to cardiac sodium channel block, and translation of the effect from in vitro to in vivo models using sodium channel inhibitors flecainide and mexiletine; flecainide, but not mexiletine is commonly associated with QRS complex prolongation in humans. METHODS: Inhibition of cloned cardiac sodium channels (hNav1.5) was studied using the IonWorks platform. Conduction slowing was measured in vitro in the rabbit isolated ventricular wedge (RVW) and in vivo in the conscious telemetered rat and dog, and anaesthetised dog. RESULTS: Flecainide and mexiletine inhibited hNav1.5 channels with IC50 values of 10.7 and 67.2 µM respectively. In the RVW, QRS was increased by flecainide at 60 bpm, and at 120bpm, there was an increased effect of both drugs. In conscious rats, flecainide significantly increased QRS complex duration; mexiletine had no significant effect, but there was an increase at the highest dose in 4/6 animals. QRS complex was increased by flecainide and mexiletine in anaesthetised dogs but this was not statistically significant; in conscious dog, only flecainide produced a significant increase in QRS complex. DISCUSSION: When compared to clinical data, effects of flecainide and mexiletine in RVW and conscious dog compared well with effects in patients and healthy volunteers in terms of sensitivity. The anaesthetised dog was least sensitive for detection of changes in QRS. All assays showed some differentiation between the expected conduction slowing activity of flecainide and mexiletine. Based on these data, RVW and conscious dog were most predictive for effects of compounds on QRS complex and cardiac conduction.

Pilot study: Noninvasive monitoring of oral flecainide's effects on atrial electrophysiology during persistent human atrial fibrillation using the surface electrocardiogram.

BACKGROUND: The relation between flecainide's plasma level and its influence on human atrial electrophysiology during acute and maintenance therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. Therefore, this study determined flecainide plasma levels and atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from the surface ECG during initiation and early maintenance of oral flecainide in patients with persistent lone AF and assessed their relationship. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 10 patients (5 males, mean age 63 +/- 14 years, left atrial diameter 46 +/- 3 mm) with persistent lone AF, flecainide was administered as a single oral bolus (day 1) followed by 200-400 mg/day (days 2-5). The initial 300 mg flecainide bolus resulted in therapeutic plasma levels in all patients (range 288-629 ng/ml) with no side effects. Flecainide plasma levels increased on day 3 and remained stable thereafter. Day 5 plasma levels were lower (508 +/- 135 vs 974 +/- 276 ng/ml, P = 0.009) in patients with daily mean flecainide doses of 200 mg compared to patients with higher maintenance doses. Fibrillatory rate obtained from the surface electrocardiogram measuring 378 +/- 17 fpm at baseline was reduced to 270 +/- 18 fpm (P < 0.001) after the flecainide bolus but remained stable thereafter. Fibrillatory rate reduction was independent of flecainide plasma levels or clinical variables. CONCLUSION: A 300 mg oral flecainide bolus is associated with electrophysiologic effects that are not increased during early maintenance therapy in persistent human lone AF. In contrast to drug plasma levels, serial analysis of fibrillatory rate allows monitoring of individual drug effects on atrial electrophysiology.

Differentiation of the electrophysiological effects on the atrial myocardium between the pure Na channel blocker, pilsicainide, and flecainide.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to identify the difference between the pure Na channel blocker, pilsicainide and Ic-antiarrhythmic drug, flecainide, on the atrial electrophysiological characteristics. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 24 patients (48 +/- 12 years-old: P-group) in whom pilsicainide was administrated intravenously (1 mg/kg/10 min) and 31 patients (47 +/- 15 years-old: F-group) in whom flecainide was administrated intravenously (2 mg/kg/10 min). The atrial effective refractory period (ERP-A), intra-atrial conduction time (CT), max intra-atrial conduction delay (Max CD), repetitive atrial firing zone (RAFZ), fragmented atrial activity zone (FAZ) and intra-atrial conduction delay zone (CDZ) were measured before and after the drugs. RESULTS: Pilsicainide and flecainide significantly prolonged the ERP-A (211 +/- 27 msec to 246 +/- 39 msec; p < 0.001, 217 +/- 25 msec to 244 +/- 33 msec; p < 0.001, respectively) and CT (121 +/- 33 msec to 149 +/- 43 msec; p < 0.001, 122 +/- 22 msec to 153 +/- 27 msec; p < 0.001, respectively) to the same degree. However, the Max CD was shortened by pilsicainide, but not by flecainide. The RAFZ, FAZ and CDZ decreased in the P-group (21 +/- 25 msec to 4 +/- 10 msec; p < 0.01, 24 +/- 24 msec to 14 +/- 18 msec; p < 0.05, 56 +/- 29 msec to 43 +/- 32 msec, p < 0.05, respectively), but not in the F-group. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of atrial conduction delays may differ between pilsicainide and flecainide. Further examination will be needed to explain this mechanism.