Dietary serine-microbiota interaction enhances chemotherapeutic toxicity without altering drug conversion.

The gut microbiota metabolizes drugs and alters their efficacy and toxicity. Diet alters drugs, the metabolism of the microbiota, and the host. However, whether diet-triggered metabolic changes in the microbiota can alter drug responses in the host has been largely unexplored. Here we show that dietary thymidine and serine enhance 5-fluoro 2'deoxyuridine (FUdR) toxicity in C. elegans through different microbial mechanisms. Thymidine promotes microbial conversion of the prodrug FUdR into toxic 5-fluorouridine-5'-monophosphate (FUMP), leading to enhanced host death associated with mitochondrial RNA and DNA depletion, and lethal activation of autophagy. By contrast, serine does not alter FUdR metabolism. Instead, serine alters E. coli's 1C-metabolism, reduces the provision of nucleotides to the host, and exacerbates DNA toxicity and host death without mitochondrial RNA or DNA depletion; moreover, autophagy promotes survival in this condition. This work implies that diet-microbe interactions can alter the host response to drugs without altering the drug or the host.

Rabeprazole intake does not affect systemic exposure to capecitabine and its metabolites, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, and 5-fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: Several retrospective studies have shown that the antitumor efficacy of capecitabine-containing chemotherapy decreases when co-administered with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Although a reduction in capecitabine absorption by PPIs was proposed as the underlying mechanism, the effects of PPIs on capecitabine pharmacokinetics remain unclear. We prospectively examined the effects of rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites. METHODS: We enrolled patients administered adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) for postoperative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and metastatic CRC patients receiving CapeOX with/without bevacizumab. Patients receiving a PPI before registration were allocated to the rabeprazole group, and the PPI was changed to rabeprazole (20 mg/day) at least 1 week before the initiation of capecitabine treatment. On day 1, oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered 1 h after rabeprazole intake. Oxaliplatin (and bevacizumab) administration on day 1 was shifted to day 2 for pharmacokinetic analysis of the first capecitabine dose. Plasma concentrations of capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, and 5-fluorouracil were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Effects of rabeprazole on inhibition of cell proliferation by each capecitabine metabolite were examined with colon cancer cells (COLO205 and HCT116). RESULTS: Five and 9 patients enrolled between September 2017 and July 2018 were allocated to rabeprazole and control groups, respectively. No significant effects of rabeprazole on area under the plasma concentration-time curve divided by capecitabine dose for capecitabine and its three metabolites were observed. Rabeprazole did not affect the proliferation inhibition of colon cancer cells by the respective capecitabine metabolites. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole does not affect capecitabine pharmacokinetics.

Comparison of average, scaled average, and population bioequivalence methods for assessment of highly variable drugs: an experience with doxifluridine in beagle dogs.

Several strategies for overcoming the challenge of establishing bioequivalence (BE) for highly variable drugs (HVDs; drugs having within-subject variability >0.3) have been considered in recent years. Within-subject variability of the area under the curve (AUC(4h)) and peak concentration (C(max)) of doxifluridine in the minimal group (n=24) were 0.444 and 0.491, respectively, meeting the criteria for an HVD. For the large group (n=60), within-subject variability of the AUC(4h) and C(max) were 0.431 and 0.493, respectively. The 90% confidence interval for the AUC(4h) and C(max) of the ratio of the test drug to the reference drug exceeded the acceptable BE limits (0.80-1.25) of the ABE (average bioequivalence), in both the minimal and large groups. However, the 90% CI fell within the extended BE limits (0.61-1.64) of the SABE (scaled average bioequivalence), calculated using within-subject variability. The 95% CI of the AUC(4h) and C(max) of the ratio of test to reference drug were within the extended BE limit (<1.73) of the PBE (population bioequivalence), calculated using total variance. Our results suggest that the SABE method may be useful for evaluating the BE of HVDs and for meeting the need for international guidelines for BE.

Increased preclinical efficacy of irinotecan and floxuridine coencapsulated inside liposomes is associated with tumor delivery of synergistic drug ratios.

Whether anticancer drug combinations act synergistically or antagonistically often depends on the ratio of the agents being combined. We show here that combinations of irinotecan and floxuridine exhibit drug ratio-dependent cytotoxicity in a broad panel of tumor cell lines in vitro where a 1:1 molar ratio consistently provided synergy and avoided antagonism. In vivo delivery of irinotecan and floxuridine coencapsulated inside liposomes at the synergistic 1:1 molar ratio (referred to as CPX-1) lead to greatly enhanced efficacy compared to the two drugs administered as a saline-based cocktail in a number of human xenograft and murine tumor models. When compared to liposomal irinotecan or liposomal floxuridine, the therapeutic activity of CPX-1 in vivo was not only superior to the individual liposomal agents, but the extent of tumor growth inhibition was greater than that predicted for combining the activities of the individual agents. In contrast, liposome delivery of irinotecan:floxuridine ratios shown to be antagonistic in vitro provided antitumor activity that was actually less than that achieved with liposomal irinotecan alone, indicative of in vivo antagonism. Synergistic antitumor activity observed for CPX-1 was associated with maintenance of the 1:1 irinotecan:floxuridine molar ratio in plasma and tumor tissue over 16-24 h. In contrast, injection of the drugs combined in saline resulted in irinotecan:floxuridine ratios that changed 10-fold within 1 h in plasma and sevenfold within 4 h in tumor tissue. These results indicate that substantial improvements in the efficacy of drug combinations may be achieved by maintaining in vitro-identified synergistic drug ratios after systemic administration using drug delivery vehicles.

Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil following hepatic intra-arterial infusion in a VX2 hepatic metastasis model.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) has been a treatment option for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. However, an optimal administration schedule of 5-FU is still controversial. This study was conducted to evaluate a suitable schedule from the viewpoint of 5-FU metabolites and related enzymes. METHODS: 5-FU was infused into the hepatic artery of rabbits having hepatic deposits of VX2 tumor cells in a daily dose of 1, 4, or 8 mg/kg using various schedules. 5-FU, Thymidylate synthase (TS), TS inhibition rate (TSIR), and the amount of fluoro-RNA (F-RNA) were measured. RESULTS: A high concentration of 5-FU was detected in the tumors of the group that was administered a dose of 8 mg/kg. TSIR in the tumor was about two-fold higher in the rabbits that were administered a total dose of 8 mg/kg than in those that were administered doses of 4 mg/kg or less. F-RNA, ranging from 27 to 36 ng/mg RNA, was detected in the tumor of the rabbits that were administered a total dose of 8 mg/kg. No difference was observed between the short period and the continuous administration schedules of rabbits that were administered a dose of 8 mg/kg of 5-FU. However, DNA synthesis inhibition in normal hepatic tissue was more dependent on the administration schedule than on the total dose of 5-FU because TSIR was significantly higher with shorter periods of drug administration. CONCLUSION: Intermittent bolus administration of large doses of 5-FU might cause more severe hepatic impairment than continuous administration. These results suggest that hepatic intra-arterial infusion of 5-FU should be administered continuously for liver metastasis, although further experiments including a longer administration period of 5-FU are required.

Intratumoral pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylase (PyNPase) activity predicts a selective effect of adjuvant 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'DFUR) on breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylase (PyNPase) is the enzyme that converts 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouracil (5'DFUR) to 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Its activity in cancer tissue may correlate with the selective antitumor activity of 5'DFUR in breast cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and sixteen T2 breast cancer patients were treated consecutively with surgery followed by 5'DFUR (600 mg/body/day) + tamoxifen (20 mg/body/day) for 2 years. PyNPase activity in breast cancer tissue, determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, ranged from 4.2-626.0 micrograms FU/mg protein/hr (mean +/- SD, 203.5 +/- 122.4), and the examined patients were divided into two groups: group A (high PyNPase group), cases with the PyNPase activity equal to or more than the mean value of 203.5 micrograms FU/mg protein/hr, and group B (low PyNPase group), cases with activity less than the mean value. RESULTS: Although there was no difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) between groups A and B, among node-positive patients (n = 83) those in group A tended to have a longer RFS. When divided into subgroups according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, among node-positive and ER-positive tumors (n = 49), the RFS was significantly better in group A than in group B (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intratumoral PyNPase activity might be of use as a predictor of the effect of adjuvant 5'DFUR on breast cancer.

A phase I trial of immediate postoperative intraperitoneal floxuridine and leucovorin plus systemic 5-fluorouracil and levamisole after resection of high risk colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of immediate postoperative intraperitoneal (IP) floxuridine (FUdR) and leucovorin (LV) after resection of high risk colon cancer, and to determine the appropriate dose of intravenous fluorouracil (FU) plus levamisole during concurrent intraperitoneal therapy. METHODS: The authors conducted a tertiary referral Comprehensive Cancer Center Phase I Trial in patients with resected colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. After resection of all gross disease, intraperitoneal treatment was administered twice daily for 3 days every 2 weeks for three cycles (Days 1-3, 15-17, 29-31). Intravenous FU daily for 5 days was administered on days 29-33 concurrently with the third cycle of intraperitoneal therapy. Fluorouracil doses during the last cycle of intraperitoneal therapy were escalated; intraperitoneal FUdR and LV doses and weekly intravenous FU doses (starting on Day 58) were fixed. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with resected high risk colon cancer were treated. Three had Dukes' B2, 16 Dukes' C, and 7 Dukes' D (M1) resected tumors. Intraperitoneal therapy was well tolerated with no increase in operative morbidity and no operative mortality. Two patients had > or = Grade 3+ toxicity during IP therapy alone. There were no treatment related deaths. During concurrent intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose of FU was 300 mg/m2/day for 5 days. The recommended dose for Phase II or III trials is 200 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that using the doses used in this trial, measurable systemic concentrations of FUdR and LV were obtained during IP therapy. This may have contributed to observed toxicity with intravenous FU doses of 300-400 mg/m2. With a median duration of follow-up of 18 months, four patients had recurrence of disease. No peritoneal recurrences have been noted to date. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate postoperative IP FUdR and LV are well tolerated after resection of high risk colon cancer. The recommended dose of intravenous FU beginning on Day 29 (concurrent with the last dose of IP therapy) is 5FU 200 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days. The remaining year of adjuvant fluorouracil and levamisole can be administered with standard dose attenuation. Although follow-up is short, the lack of recurrent peritoneal metastases is encouraging. Additional trials with this approach are warranted in patients with high risk colorectal cancer.

[A comparative study on the serum and tissue 5-FU concentrations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after preoperative oral administration of UFT and 5'-DFUR].

UFT or 5'-DFUR was orally administered to the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma preoperatively and the concentrations of these drugs and 5-FU in the serum, liver tissue and cancer tissue obtained at the time of operation were measured. The unchanged 5'-DFUR was not detected in any of these samples. The concentration of 5-FU in cancer tissue was significantly higher in UFT treated group (0.409 microgram/g) than that in 5'-DFUR group (0.040 microgram/g). However, the 5-FU levels in the serum and noncancerous liver tissue were also higher than those in the patients with other organ cancers. Although UFT is a useful drug for the adjuvant chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma, the dose was considered to be minimized to avoid the side effects since the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes may be decreased in hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with liver cirrhosis.

[Selective anticancer effects of intra-arterial infusion of 3',5'-dioctanoyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (TT82) in hepatocellular carcinoma].

3'-5'-Dioctanoyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (TT 82), one of the lipophilic prodrugs of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine mixed with Lipiodol (LPD), was injected into the hepatic artery before hepatic resection in 4 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Later, the anti-cancer effects of the drug were evaluated mainly by the examination of resected specimens. The serum alpha-fetoprotein levels of three patients in whom the values were over normal range fell to less than 50% of pretreatment values from 7 to 14 days after the injections. In pathological observation of the specimens, the necrosis rates of main tumors were 100%, 70%, 30% and 0%, respectively. In three patients whose main tumors showed complete or partial necrosis, selective depositions of LPD in the tumors were observed on soft X-ray photographs. The concentrations of TT 82 and its metabolites in the tissues of LPD-depositing areas were markedly higher than those in tissue of the regions without LPD deposits. These findings suggested that TT82-Lipiodol mixture remained selectively in the cancerous tissues and exhibited anticancer effects following injection into the hepatic artery.

Selective accumulation of 3',5'-dioctanoyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd-C8) and sustained release of its active metabolites in VX-2 rabbit hepatoma following intraarterial administration of FdUrd-C8 solution in Lipiodol.

Selective accumulation/retention of 3',5'-dioctanoyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd-C8) and sustained release of its active metabolites, 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridylate (FdUMP), in the rabbit hepatoma (VX-2) were achieved following intrahepatic arterial administration of FdUrd-C8 solution in Lipiodol. Though no significant difference in the FdUrd-C8 levels among the tumor and nontumorous liver was observed immediately after administration, slower elimination of FdUrd-C8 from the tumor (t 1/2 = 15.8 h) than that from nontumorous sites (t 1/2 = 3.8-4.2 h) resulted in selective retention of FdUrd-C8 (17- to 157-fold) in the tumor. Selectively higher levels of FdUrd and FdUMP in the tumor were also achieved (5- to 35-fold) and kept for 72 h after administration. The selective accumulation was also demonstrated in radioactivity distribution after administration of [6-3H]-FdUrd-C8. The ratio of radioactivity in the tumor divided by that in the blood (T/B ratio) was in a range of 870 to 5400 during a 15- to 1440-min period after administration. A trace of radioactivity was found in the stomach, duodenum, kidneys, and bone marrow. Roles of activation and deactivation enzymes on the selective distribution of FdUrd-C8 were also investigated. Esterase activity, which is responsible for the regeneration of FdUrd from FdUrd-C8, was relatively low in the tumor before administration and gradually increased after administration. Phosphorylase activity, which is related to phosphorolytic cleavage of FdUrd, in the tumor was about 3/5 as much as that in the nontumorous liver. These enzyme activities seem to play limited roles in the selective accumulation/retention and regeneration of the drug.