Fluoride-induced iron overload contributes to hepatic oxidative damage in mouse and the protective role of Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract.

Emerging evidence has demonstrated that iron overload plays an important role in oxidative stress in the liver. This study aimed to explore whether fluoride-induced hepatic oxidative stress is associated with iron overload and whether grape seed proanthocyanidin extract (GSPE) alleviates oxidative stress by reducing iron overload. Forty Kunming male mice were randomly divided into 4 groups and treated for 5 weeks with distilled water (control), sodium fluoride (NaF) (100 mg/L), GSPE (400 mg/kg bw), or NaF (100 mg/L) + GSPE (400 mg/kg bw). Mice exposed to NaF showed typical poisoning changes of morphology, increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities in the liver. NaF treatment also increased MDA accumulation, decreased GSH-Px, SOD and T-AOC levels in liver, indicative of oxidative stress. Intriguingly, all these detrimental effects were alleviated by GSPE. Further study revealed that NaF induced disorders of iron metabolism, as manifested by elevated iron level with increased hepcidin but decreased ferroportin expression, which contributed to hepatic oxidative stress. Importantly, the iron dysregulation induced by NaF could be normalized by GSPE. Collectively, these data provide a novel insight into mechanisms underlying fluorosis and highlight the potential of GSPE as a naturally occurring prophylactic treatment for fluoride-induced hepatotoxicity associated with iron overload.

Streptozotocin Aggravated Osteopathology and Insulin Induced Osteogenesis Through Co-treatment with Fluoride.

The role of insulin in the mechanism underlying the excessive fluoride that causes skeletal lesion was studied. The in vitro bone marrow stem cells (BMSC) collected from Kunming mice were exposed to varying concentrations of fluoride with or without insulin. The cell viability and early differentiation of BMSC co-treated with fluoride and insulin were measured by using cell counting kit-8 and Gomori modified calcium-cobalt method, respectively. We further investigated the in vivo effects of varying dose of fluoride on rats co-treated with streptozotocin (STZ). Wistar rats were divided into six groups which included normal control, 10 mg fluoride/kg day group, 20 mg fluoride/kg day group, STZ control, STZ+10 mg fluoride/kg day group, and STZ+20 mg fluoride/kg day group. The rats were administered with sodium fluoride (NaF) by gavage with water at doses 10 and 20 mg fluoride/kg day for 2 months. In a period of one month, half of rats in every group were treated with streptozotocin (STZ) once through intraperitoneal injection at 52 mg/kg body weight. The serum glucose, HbA1c, and insulin were determined. Bone mineral content and insulin release were assessed. The results showed insulin combined with fluoride stimulated BMSC cell viability in vitro. The bone mineral content reduced in rats treated with higher dose of fluoride and decreased immensely in rat co-treated with fluoride and STZ. Similarly, a combination treatment of a high dose of fluoride and STZ decreased insulin sensitivity and activity. To sum up, these data indicated fluoride influenced insulin release, activity, and sensitivity. Furthermore, the insulin state in vivo interfered in the osteogenesis in turn and implied there was a close relation between insulin and bone pathogenesis in the mechanism of fluoride toxicity.

Fluorine-induced apoptosis and lipid peroxidation in human hair follicles in vitro.

Fluoride is an essential trace element for human body; however, exposure to high amounts of fluoride has been documented to be correlated with an increasing risk of hair loss. To date, little is known about the mechanism(s) of how fluoride affects hair follicles. Here, we demonstrated that middle (1.0 mmol/L) and high (10.0 mmol/L) concentrations of sodium fluoride (NaF) significantly inhibited hair follicle elongation in vitro, but low NaF (0.1 mmol/L) showed little influence. Moreover, treatment with high levels of NaF resulted in a marked increase in terminal dUTP nick end labeling-positive cells in the outer layer of the outer root sheath, the dermal sheath, and the lower bulb matrix surrounding dermal papilla. Furthermore, the enhanced apoptosis was coupled with an increased oxidative stress manifested as higher malondialdehyde content. Additionally, the presence of selenium considerably antagonized the effects of middle NaF on hair follicles, with regard to either the suppression of hair growth or the induction of oxidative stress and apoptosis. In conclusion, exposure to high levels of fluoride compromises hair follicle growth and accelerate cell apoptosis in vitro. The toxicity of fluoride can be reduced by selenium, at least partially via the suppression of intracellular oxidative stress.

Influence of supplementary vitamins and minerals on lipid peroxidation and redox state in heart, kidney and liver of rats exposed to fluoride.

The effect of fluoride (F) and supplementary vitamins and minerals on lipid peroxidation (LPO) and redox state (RS) in heart, kidney and liver of 40 (4 groups of 10) male Wistar rats were studied. One group of rats was left untreated as control, group 1 was received 5 mg/l NaF in their drinking water, group 2 was received 5 mg/l NaF in their drinking water plus vitamins (A, C, and D) in their diet, and group 3 was received 5 mg/l NaF in their drinking water plus vitamins (A, C, and D) and minerals (Mg-, Mn-, Zn-sulfate, and Na-citrate) in their diet. In comparison with the group 2, 3 and controls, elevated malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the group 1 indicated an increase in LPO product. In addition, unsteady ratios of oxidized to reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+/NADH) reflected significant alterations in the RS status. These results demonstrate that the combination of vitamins and minerals supplementation proved to restore MDA content and establish steady RS status that has not been previously reported.

Effect of boron as an antidote on dry matter intake, nutrient utilization and fluorine balance in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) exposed to high fluoride ration.

It is well known that excessive accumulation of fluorides can exert toxic effects on various tissues and organs so as to severely damage the health and production of animals. The aim of this study was to determine beneficial effect of boron on nutrient utilization in buffalo calves exposed to high fluoride (F) ration. For this purpose, we used three groups of four male Murrah buffalo calves (body weight 98-100 kg, aged 6-8 month) each. Control animal was given only basal diet and concentrate mixture. However, treatment I animals were fed basal diet, concentrate mixture, and F [as NaF, 60 ppm of dry matter (DM)]. The treatment II animals were fed basal diet, concentrate mixture, F (as NaF, 60 ppm of DM), and B (as sodium tetraborate, 140 ppm of DM). After 90 days of experimental feeding, a metabolism trial of 7 days duration was conducted to study the treatment effect on nutrient utilization of proximate nutrients, absorption, excretion, and retention of N, Ca, P, Fe, Zn, Cu, and F. Dietary F significantly (p < 0.05) depressed the dry matter intake and increased the apparent digestibility, absorption, and retention of F. However, boron supplementation significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the apparent digestibility, absorption, and retention of F and improved the dry matter intake, fecal excretion, and percent of absorbed F excreted via urine. Apparent digestibility of proximate nutrients (viz. DM, crude protein, crude fiber, ether extract, and nitrogen free extract) was unaffected on either F or F+B treatment. However, absorption and excretion of N, Ca, P, Fe, Zn, and Cu were affected significantly (p < 0.05) on F or F+B treatment. These findings suggest that fluoride-containing diet for short duration has effect on nutrient utilization, and boron at 140-ppm dose level, in general, antagonized the absorption and retention of F and also improved the feed intake in buffalo calves.

Three-year effectiveness of intravenous pamidronate versus pamidronate plus slow-release sodium fluoride for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

All currently available and approved therapies for osteoporosis inhibit bone resorption. But, despite their great value, antiresorptive agents are generally not associated with dramatic increases in bone mass. In light of these data, the aim of our prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, with a 3-year follow up, was to examine the effects of cyclic intravenous pamidronate and fluoride in combination, versus pamidronate alone, on bone mineral density (BMD) at vertebral and femoral levels, biochemical markers of bone turnover, IGF-1 serum levels, and safety and tolerability in 40 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. During the treatment period, pamidronate alone reduced both markers of bone formation and bone resorption, resulting in an increase of BMD, after 3 years, of 7.07% at the lumbar level and of 6.76% at the femoral level. In the group treated with pamidronate and fluoride, markers of bone turnover had a different trend: after 3 years, there was a lower reduction of bone resorption and an increase of bone formation markers, with a concomitant increase in IGF-1 levels. This resulted, after 3 years of treatment, in a marked variation of BMD at the lumbar level (+12.74%) and a reduced, but still significant, increase at the femoral level (3.89%). Spine radiography and clinical evaluation did not reveal any vertebral fractures in either treatment group. In conclusion, the combined use of pamidronate and fluoride produced somewhat larger, continuous increases in BMD, at the lumbar level, than pamidronate alone.

Fármacos que inducen osteomalacia / Osteomalacia inducing drugs

No disponbile (AU)

The role of fluoride in the prevention of osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis defined as low bone mass and increased susceptibility to fracture is a reflection of the sum of peak bone mass and any bone that has been lost once peak mass has been attained. Several strategies have been applied to optimize peak bone mass and to prevent bone loss. Fluoride has greatest potential as a therapy for osteoporosis once bone has been lost. It has been demonstrated both experimentally and clinically to stimulate bone formation directly and to increase bone mass in patients who already have osteoporosis. Several bone formation/stimulation therapies are under development, and some of these have reached the stage of clinical trial. None of these therapies has been as extensively studied as fluoride, and none is sufficiently advanced in development to be clinically available in the next 3 to 5 years. Fluoride therapy for osteoporosis is already performed in many countries, and approval for use in osteoporosis in the United States is pending. The first clinical trials of NaF therapy for osteoporosis were reported by Rich and Ensinck in 1961. Since then, hundreds of reports on the successes and failures of fluoride therapy have appeared in the literature. At first glance, it seems disappointing and inexplicable that, after 40 years of research, fluoride is still considered an experimental drug in the United States. One plausible explanation is that much of the early research on this drug was suboptimal, including the author's contributions. Fluoride as a naturally occurring element is difficult to patent, and this has kept major pharmaceutical companies from investing heavily in fluoride therapy despite its obvious potential. As a result, pharmacologic and pharmacokinetics studies of fluoride are limited in scope, as are phase I and phase II human toxicology and dose-finding studies. Most early studies of large doses of plain NaF were unable to demonstrate a consistent effect on fracture rate despite a consistent and dramatic effect on bone density. Once this became obvious and as new technologies for measuring bone density became available, it became equally clear that future clinical trials would have to be performed using different formulations of fluoride and lower doses. This approach has not resulted in uniformly positive clinical trials, and one must look elsewhere for answers. The most compelling explanation is that the trials have included patients with different severity of disease, suggesting that there is point in the bone loss spectrum at which even a potent bone-stimulating agent such as fluoride is ineffective. This possibility should provoke a reappraisal of the earlier negative studies: was the failure a result of the drug or of patient selection? The answer to this question is crucial, because these failures have cast a long shadow over the safety of fluoride and are contributing more to the absence of this drug from the pharmacopoeia than any other factor.

Acute fluoride toxicity from ingesting home-use dental products in children, birth to 6 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: This paper analyzes reports to the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) of suspected overingestion of fluoride by children younger than 6 years of age between 1989 and 1994, and estimates the probably toxic amounts of various home-use fluoride products in children younger than 6 years of age. METHODS: Annual incidence rates of reported fluoride exposures attributed to dietary supplements, toothpaste, and rinses were calculated. Probably toxic amounts of each product were calculated using the frequently cited dose of 5 mg/kg. RESULTS: Children younger than 6 years of age accounted for more than 80 percent of reports of suspected overingestion. While the outcomes were generally not serious, several hundred children were treated at health care facilities each year. A 10 kg child who ingests 50 mg fluoride (10.1 g 1.1% NaF gel; 32.7 g 0.63% SnF2 gel; 33.3 g 1,500 ppm F toothpaste; 50 g 1,000 ppm F toothpaste; and 221 mL 0.05% NaF rinse) will have ingested a probably toxic dose. CONCLUSIONS: Overingestion of fluoride products in the home is preventable. Dentists and other health care providers should educate parents and child care providers about the importance of keeping fluoride products out of reach of children. Manufacturers should be encouraged by the ADA and the FDA to use child-resistant packaging for all fluoride products intended for use in the home.

Fluoride therapy of type I osteoporosis.

Sodium Fluoride (NaF) is the only medication so far clinically available with a bone formation stimulating property, through its peculiar mitogenic dose-dependent action on the osteoblast cell line. Bone strength is commensurate to bone mass, and in a condition with fragility fractures, like osteoporosis, it seems logical to restore bone mass without weakening bone strength. However, as with any active drug. NaF therapy requires adhesion to elementary rules if drawbacks are to be prevented. A first mandatory rule is not to prescribe NaF without calcium supplementation, if bone loss at the appendicular skeleton is to be avoided; to prevent this, the availability of monofluorophosphate (MFP), containing the fluoride and calcium salts in the same preparation has enhanced the compliance to calcium supplementation. A second rule is not to give supraphysiological doses of vitamin D, for the same reason. Third, if one wants to avoid a calcium shift from cortical to trabecular bone and osteomalacia, one should use small doses of NaF, of the order of 50 mg/day. With this in mind, the bioavailability of the drug has to be taken into account, particularly its gastrointestinal absorption which is dramatically enhanced if a plain non entericoated (EC) capsule is used, as compared to that of an EC tablet with the same face value. Too much NaF is deleterious to bone, a fact known for years. Already in 1972, it was noted that in all patients receiving 60 mg or more of NEC NaF, daily, morphologically abnormal bone developed and which appeared irregular and contained areas of incompletely mineralized bone. The bone was histologically and microradiographically normal in patients receiving 45 mg or less of NEC NaF/day. Fourth, NaF therapy is contraindicated in renal insufficiency owing to an enhanced retention in the skeleton. NaF is, however, by no means the ideal medication, because its therapeutic window is narrow. It has many bothersome drawbacks, and notably it is irritating for the gastric mucosa, a hazard which may be partly circumvented by the use of an Ec or slow release tablet. Furthermore, peripheral stress fractures may occur, and, in our experience, they were seen in 17% of patients, almost exclusively in females with a low lumbar BMD. Their occurrence should be curtailed by not allowing an increase in alkaline phosphatase activity of more than 50%. This is a relatively benign complication, because no stress fracture degenerated into a complete fracture. In all cases, the stress fractures healed after a transitory drug discontinuation. If there is some concern about cortical bone, NaF therapy may be associated with an antiresorber like estrogens which will prevent any further bone loss, and does not impair the response to NaF. NaF therapy should be reserved for patients suffering chiefly from trabecular osteoporosis and should be avoided in senile osteoporosis, because of a frequently impaired renal function. Currently, we would recommend in clinical practice a daily dose of 50 mg EC-NaF or 150 mg Ca-MFP as the therapy of involutional osteoporosis in women, reserving the dose of 75 mg EC-NAF or 200 mg MFP for males or female patients resistant to lower dose. The therapy should be maintained for 2 to 3 years, or more, according to the bone response, taking into account that patients with the vertebral crush fracture syndrome have lost on average 30%, as compard to the young adult mean.

[Fluorosis. Experiences based on two cases]. / Fluorose. Erfaringer basert på to pasienter.

Since 1961 sodium fluoride has been an alternative in the treatment of osteoporosis, although there is still some difference of opinion between endocrinologists regarding the effect on pain and occurrence of fracture of the vertebral column. Two cases are reported, both treated for postmenopausal osteoporosis with calcium, vitamin D and sodium fluoride for longer periods over many years, and with good effect on pain and tendency to lumbar vertebral body fracture. In both patients the diagnosis of skeletal fluorosis was delayed for several years, mainly because information about this treatment never reached the radiologist. When the diagnosis was eventually established after the radiologist himself had made inquiries to the referring physician, the patients had in the meanwhile undergone several unnecessary supplementary examinations because of suspected cancer metastasis.

Changes in the plasma electrolytes and metabolites of the rat following acute exposure to sodium fluoride and strontium chloride.

Acute exposure of rats to strontium or fluoride by i.p. injection of sodium fluoride or strontium chloride resulted in a systemic response in which changes occurred in the plasma electrolytes and metabolites. Strontium resulted in a rapid but temporary hypercalcaemia while fluoride produced a temporary hypocalcaemia. There was no significant hypophosphataemia after fluoride and only a transient hypophosphataemia with strontium. There was some indication of kidney damage and a general stress response following fluoride injection. These results do not support the hypothesis that interglobular dentine is associated with hypophosphataemia or hypoplastic enamel with hypocalcaemia and are in conflict with the observation that the formation of interglobular dentine following the injection of lead acetate is associated with hyperphosphataemia and hypercalcaemia.

Slow-release sodium fluoride in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether intermittent treatment with slow-release sodium fluoride and continuous calcium citrate supplementation inhibits vertebral fractures without causing fluoride complications. DESIGN: A placebo-controlled, randomized trial. SETTING: Outpatient setting of specialty clinics in Dallas and Temple, Texas. INTERVENTIONS: Slow-release sodium fluoride (25 mg twice daily) in repeated 14-month cycles (12 months on treatment followed by 2 months off treatment) compared with placebo. Both groups took calcium citrate (400 mg calcium twice daily) continuously. PATIENTS: 110 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to two groups. In the slow-release sodium fluoride group, 48 of 54 patients completed more than 1 cycle of treatment (mean, 2.44 cycles/patient), whereas 51 of 56 patients in the placebo group completed at least 1 cycle (mean, 2.14 cycles/patient) in this interim analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Vertebral fracture rate and lumbar bone mineral content. Vertebral fractures were quantified from yearly radiographs. Bone mass was determined annually by densitometry. RESULTS: In the sodium fluoride group, the mean L2 to L4 bone mineral content increased by 4% to 6% in each cycle and the mean femoral neck bone density increased by 4.1% and 2.1% during the first two cycles, but the radial bone density did not change. The placebo group showed no statistical change in bone mass at any site. Compared with the placebo group, the sodium fluoride group had a lower individual new vertebral fracture rate (0.057/patient cycle compared with 0.204/patient cycle, P = 0.017), a higher fracture-free rate (83.3% compared with 64.7%, P = 0.042), and a lower group fracture rate (0.085/patient cycle compared with 0.239/patient cycle, P = 0.006). The side-effect profile was similar for the two groups; no patient developed microfractures, hip fractures, or blood loss anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent slow-release sodium fluoride plus continuous calcium citrate, administered for about 2.5 years, inhibits new vertebral fractures, increases the mean spinal bone mass without decreasing the radial shaft bone density, and is safe to use.

Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Although fluoride increases bone mass, the newly formed bone may have reduced strength. To assess the effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in osteoporosis, we conducted a four-year prospective clinical trial in 202 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures who were randomly assigned to receive sodium fluoride (75 mg per day) or placebo. All received a calcium supplement (1500 mg per day). Sixty-six women in the fluoride group and 69 women in the placebo group completed the trial. As compared with the placebo group, the treatment group had increases in median bone mineral density of 35 percent (P less than 0.0001) in the lumbar spine (predominantly cancellous bone), 12 percent (P less than 0.0001) in the femoral neck, and 10 percent (P less than 0.0001) in the femoral trochanter (sites of mixed cortical and cancellous bone), but the bone mineral density decreased by 4 percent (P less than 0.02) in the shaft of the radius (predominantly cortical bone). The number of new vertebral fractures was similar in the treatment and placebo groups (163 and 136, respectively; P not significant), but the number of nonvertebral fractures was higher in the treatment group (72 vs. 24; P less than 0.01). Fifty-four women in the fluoride group and 24 in the placebo group had side effects sufficiently severe to warrant dose reduction; the major side effects were gastrointestinal symptoms and lower-extremity pain. We conclude that fluoride therapy increases cancellous but decreases cortical bone mineral density and increases skeletal fragility. Thus, under the conditions of this study, the fluoride-calcium regimen was not effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Treatment of vertebral osteoporosis with disodium monofluorophosphate: comparison with sodium fluoride.

Eighty one women with vertebral osteoporosis were treated for up to 2 years with fluoride administered either as monofluorophosphate (MFP, 200 mg/day, i.e., 26.4 mg fluoride-ion) or sodium fluoride (NaF, 50 mg/day, i.e., 22.6 mg fluoride-ion). All patients received calcium supplementation (1 g of Ca2+/day) taken apart from NaF and in the same tablet for MFP. Despite almost similar fluoride dosage of both regimens, the early increase in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was higher with MFP than with NaF, reaching 11% and 4%, respectively, at 1 year (p = 0.007), and 21% and 6%, respectively, at 18 months (p less than 0.001). The incidence of lower extremity pain syndrome related to benign stress microfractures was also higher with MFP than with NaF (35% and 15%, respectively, p less than 0.01). Urinary fluoride levels were higher in the MFP than in the NaF group (9.6 +/- 3.5 vs. 6.8 +/- 3.4 at one year, p = 0.003), suggesting that this difference in efficacy and tolerance is related to a better bioavailability of fluoride provided by MFP than by NaF. The occurrence of a stress microfracture could not be predicted by any clinical, biochemical, or densitometric parameter before treatment, but patients presenting with a stress microfracture during the course of the treatment had a higher gain in bone mass than those without stress fractures (at 1 yr+11 vs. +5%, p = 0.03 and at 18 months +18 vs. +6.9%, p less than 0.02). In conclusion, there is a clear correlation between the efficacy and the occurrence of side effects of fluoride therapy in osteoporosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of intermittent therapy with a slow-release fluoride preparation.

Long-term clinical effects of intermittent sodium fluoride (slow-release) therapy were assessed in 71 patients with primary osteoporosis. In Group I (receiving 1,25-(OH)2D3 2 micrograms/day for 2 weeks before 3 months of sodium fluoride treatment 25 mg twice a day, in each 5-month cycle), vertebral (L2-L4) bone mineral content did not change significantly. However, the L2-L4 bone mineral content significantly increased by 3.1% in Group II (those who did not receive 1,25-(OH)2D3 during 5-month cycle), 3.5% per patient year in Group III (combined NaF 25 mg twice a day with 1,25-(OH)2D3 0.5 micrograms/day for 12 months in each 13-month cycle), and by 7.8% per patient year in Group IV (combined NaF with calcium citrate for 12 months in each 13-month cycle). The rise in vertebral bone mineral content was sustained, with an annual increment of 4.2% during the third year compared with 4.4% during the first year. The vertebral fracture rate declined significantly from the pretreatment value in all groups, but comparison with a placebo control group was not available. There was no significant change in the bone density of the radial shaft or of the proximal femur. The rate of hip fracture (nontraumatic) during treatment was 1.8% per patient year, the same as before treatment. The drug was well tolerated with only minor infrequent gastrointestinal and rheumatic side effects. Thus, intermittent slow-release sodium fluoride treatment with adequate calcium supplementation augments spinal bone mass and apparently inhibits vertebral fractures, with a satisfactory safety of usage; however, it has no effect on appendicular bone mass or on hip fracture rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Stress fractures of the lower limbs in osteoporotic patients treated with fluoride.

We report clinical and bone morphometric findings in 18 osteoporotic patients who experienced stress fractures during fluoride therapy. Patients were treated with either sodium fluoride (n = 15), or sodium monofluorophosphate (n = 3). Oral calcium supplementation was given in 11 patients, and vitamin D in 13. Stress fractures occurred after 17.1 +/- 10.3 months of therapy (range: 5-41 months). Atraumatic sudden pain in a lower limb bone extremity, normal initial roentgenogram, high 99technetium uptake on early bone scan, and a 3 to 4 week delay in linear bone condensation area at the same site were characteristics of stress fracture. The most frequent sites were the tibial metaphysis (n = 13), femoral neck (n = 10), and calcaneus (n = 4). Biochemical data showed increased plasma alkaline phosphatase levels in 11 patients, and mild renal failure in 2. Bone histomorphometry was performed on an iliac crest specimen in 10 patients at the time of the stress fracture. Trabecular bone volume was normal, and formation parameters were increased. Features of osteomalacia were encountered in only 2 patients with decreased renal function. Trabecular resorption was increased, as assessed by the osteoclastic surface (1.01 +/- 1.15% bone surface), and the number of osteoclasts (0.44 +/- 0.49 per mm2 bone section). The clinical course was favorable in all patients who stopped fluoride, although 5 patients who continued the treatment had either completion of femoral neck stress fractures to hip fractures (n = 2), or recurrent stress fractures (n = 2), or both (n = 1). Fluoride appears to be a key factor in the pathogenesis of stress fractures, and may be associated with increased trabecular resorption in some treated patients.

Spontaneous hip fractures in fluoride-treated patients: potential causative factors.

Spontaneous fractures were reported to be rare (less than 1%) in 1664 hospital admissions for hip fracture in the 1950s in Sweden. We report 11 fluoride-treated postmenopausal patients who developed spontaneous fractures of the femoral necks, all subcapital initially. In 7 patients who continued treatment there were later femoral neck or shaft fractures; in 6, these were bilateral (one followed a fall). In all there were 19 spontaneous fractures: 5 were asymptomatic, including 2 with deformity; 12 fractures required surgery. Five were incomplete (stress) fractures. All were treated with supplementary calcium 1 g daily; 10 had vitamin D supplementation. In all patients where the timing was known, the initial and subsequent fractures were preceded by, or associated with increased bone turnover as measured by plasma alkaline phosphatase (pAlP) (i.e., they were all "good responders"). Two had pretreatment hip fractures following falls. We compared these 11 (Group 1) and another identically treated group of 14 patients (Group 2), without spontaneous femoral fractures and not different in mean age, pretreatment vertebral fractures, years since menopause, fluoride dosage, and plasma creatinine. Group 1 had a lower (p less than 0.05) index of cortical bone in the femoral neck, as assessed by the ratio "calcar width/femoral neck minimum width." The 6 biopsied fluorotic patients from Group 1 had a higher (p less than 0.05) bone fluoride content than the 4 biopsied fluorotic patients from Group 2. Furthermore, histological cortical features of thinning, increased porosity, and advanced tunneling resorption characterized Group 1 posttreatment biopsies. There were no significant differences in peak pAlP responses in the two groups. Mild asymptomatic vitamin D excess may have been a contributing factor in three Group 1 patients. Two further treatment groups have been studied more recently by forearm single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) at two sites; a cyclic NaF group (Group 3) and a calcium +/- vitamin D group (Group 4). Neither showed significant changes in forearm cortical bone density on treatment for 2 and 1.5 years, respectively, but Group 3 showed a significant increase in density at an ultradistal (60% trabecular) site. The pAlP response in Group 3 was significantly less than in Group 1. Spontaneous femoral neck or shaft fractures did not occur in either Groups 3 or 4. Therefore, we recommend: (1) Avoidance of sodium fluoride (NaF) treatment if pretreatment femoral fracture or thin femoral neck cortices exist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Treatment of the vertebral crush fracture syndrome with enteric-coated sodium fluoride tablets and calcium supplements.

A cohort of 101 patients were treated with enteric-coated sodium fluoride tablets and calcium supplements. Vitamin D was also given in supra-physiologic doses in 70% of the cases. Lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by dual-photon absorptiometry, increased in a linear fashion up to four years, irrespective of the value of initial BMD and of the underlying condition, be it involutional osteoporosis (the vast majority), glucocorticoid osteoporosis, or even osteogenesis imperfecta. Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) seemed to promote the fluoride-induced increase in lumbar BMD, as did the vitamin D supplements. Of these patients, 17% proved "resistant" to the therapy. There was no way of predicting who would be in this category. Compared with an age- and sex-matched control group, women showed significantly different behavior of their bone mass. In the control group, the losses were highly significant at the lumbar spine and at all three scanning sites of the forearm, as measured by single-photon absorptiometry. In contrast, the fluoride group had a significant gain of BMD at the lumbar spine and changes of BMC at the forearm were not significant. Fluoride thus preserved bone mass at the appendicular skeleton, while increasing it at the axial skeleton. When comparing the patients who received vitamin D supplements and those who did not, there was a significant difference in the appendicular skeleton. The distal forearm in the vitamin D-supplemented group tended to gain, whereas the midforearm lost significant bone mass. The trend was reversed in the group without vitamin D-supplementation, a more favorable pattern. Therefore, vitamin D supplements should not, as a rule, be provided to such patients. The biochemical hallmark of the fluoride-induced changes is a slight rise of the alkaline phosphatase within the normal range. Alkaline phosphatase levels that exceed the upper limit of normal signal a warning that too much fluoride and/or too little calcium supplements are being administered, or that a fluoride-related complication is impending or has occurred (e.g., a stress fracture). Osteosclerosis was achieved in 69% of the cases who had a radiological followup of at least four years (average period of appearance: 1.8 years). Stress fractures in the lower limbs occurred in 17 patients, almost exclusively in females, and appeared on average 2.2 years after initiation of therapy. In this group of stress fractures there was significant cortical bone loss at midforearm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)