Real-world evidence of heparin and citrate use in extracorporeal photopheresis: A hypothesis-generating data review of device settings and performance.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is widely used for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, graft-vs-host disease, and other immune-related conditions. To avoid clotting during treatment, the ECP system used must be effectively primed with an anticoagulant. Heparin is the recommended anticoagulant for the THERAKOS CELLEX System, but acid citrate dextrose-A (ACDA) is often used. We compared system performance between these two anticoagulants for this ECP system. Deidentified data for ECP device performance were obtained at each treatment session, from automatically logged Smart Cards or labels completed by device operators. We compared the effects of ACDA or heparin on overall treatment duration, buffy coat (leukocyte) collection time, photoactivation time and the number of alarms and warnings. The variability in these parameters was also assessed. Data from 23 334 treat sessions were analyzed; ACDA was used in 34.4% and heparin in 65.6%. Overall, the ECP procedure duration, buffy coat collection time and photoactivation time were numerically similar regardless of whether ACDA or heparin was used, and regardless of needle mode. Photoactivation time variability was lower with ACDA compared with heparin in all needle modes. Among treatments that were completed automatically without any operator intervention, total treatment duration and photoactivation time were significantly reduced with ACDA use in both the double- and single-needle modes. The data presented indicate that, in both double- and single-needle modes, the THERAKOS® CELLEX® integrated ECP system performed similarly with ACDA compared to heparin, although ACDA demonstrated potential benefits in reducing variability in photoactivation time.

Early intervention of extracorporeal photopheresis for advancing/progressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with progressive disease typically undergo a series of skin-directed and systemic therapy regimens during cycles of response and relapse. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective and safe systemic treatment option, often reserved for later stages of disease and typically employed after failure of several other therapies. ECP has benefits in response rate, time to next treatment, and tolerability that may support its use earlier in the treatment cycle for advancing/progressing disease.

Extracorporeal photopheresis for systemic sclerosis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by excessive production of collagen. Extracorporeal photopheresis (photochemotherapy, phototherapy) (ECP) involves repeated exposure of peripheral blood lymphocytes to ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation. The rationale for treating patients with SSc by ECP lies in its presumed immunomodulatory effects, though, rigorous data on the specific effects of ECP are limited, particularly in patients with SSc. The objective was to evaluate the effects of extracorporeal photopheresis as a treatment modality for patients with SSc. We searched the databases CENTRAL and MEDLINE on 13 March 2022 and included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on patients diagnosed with SSc and treated with ECP. Primary outcome was the change of skin scores. We applied independent extraction and judgment by multiple observers. We conducted a meta-analysis applying the inverse variance method and the random effects model; the main outcome measure was standard mean difference of skin scores. We identified three relevant RCTs including 162 randomized (132 analyzed) people who received ECP in a simple parallel design. Pooled data of the three studies were indifferent. We estimated a standard mean difference from baseline of -0.11 (95% confidence interval -0.45 to 0.23), p = 0.54, I2  = 0%. We did not identify serious treatment-related adverse events. The evidence base for extracorporeal photopheresis on skin scores in patients with systemic sclerosis was not high enough to support a superior effect when compared to no treatment, sham photopheresis, or D-penicillamine.

How we treat advanced stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma - mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

T-cell lymphomas (TCLs) constitute a rare subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) being the most common subtype of cutaneous TCLs (CTCLs). Considered an incurable but treatable disease, MF/SS management presents several challenges including diagnostic delays, debilitating effect on patients' quality of life, need for several lines of therapies, multidisciplinary care and cumulative drug toxicities limiting duration of use. The present review intends to provide an overview of the recent advances in our understanding of the biology of CTCL and how these are being leveraged to provide additional treatment options for management of advanced and recurrent disease. In addition, the discussion of the different modalities of treatment is summarised to further outline the importance of multidisciplinary care and early referral to CTCL centres.

Randomized phase II trial of extracorporeal phototherapy and steroids vs. steroids alone for newly diagnosed acute GVHD.

Steroids remain the initial therapy for acute graft-vs.-host disease (AGVHD). Strategies to improve response and minimize steroid exposure are needed. We report results of a randomized, adaptive, Bayesian-designed, phase II trial of prednisone with or without extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as an initial therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AGVHD. The primary endpoint was success at day 56 defined as: alive, in remission, achieving AGVHD response without additional therapy, and on <1 mg/kg at day 28 and <0.5 mg/kg on day 56 of steroids. Eighty-one patients were randomized to the ECP arm (n = 51) or steroids alone (n = 30). Median age was 54 years (range: 17-75); 90% had grade II AGVHD and 10% had grades III and IV AGVHD, with skin (85%), upper (22%)/lower (22%) gastrointestinal, and liver (10%) involvement. The ECP arm had a higher probability of success (0.815) and exceeded the predefined threshold for determining the investigational arm promising. ECP was potentially more beneficial than steroids-alone in skin-only AGVHD (response rate: 72% vs. 57%, respectively) than for visceral-organ AGVHD (47% vs. 43%, respectively). The addition of ECP to steroids may result in higher GVHD response as initial therapy for AGVHD, especially for patients with skin-only involvement.

Dual-chambered venous access port as alternative access for extracorporeal apheresis therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a dual-chambered venous access port for extracorporeal apheresis therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients who received a dual-chambered venous access port for apheresis therapy over a 36-month period. Clinical success was defined as successful completion of at least one round of apheresis via the venous access port. Major complications were defined as any event requiring elevation of patient care and/or venous access port removal or repositioning. Minor complications were defined as venous access port issues resolved with clinical intervention. RESULTS: Forty-four patients had a venous access port placed at the time of this study. Patients underwent red cell exchange (n = 33), therapeutic plasma exchange (n = 6) or extracorporeal photopheresis (n = 5). Forty (90%) patients had autoimmune diseases and four (10%) had neoplastic processes. Clinical success was achieved in 42 (95.5%) patients. Average venous access port dwell time was 632 days (range = 42-1191 days). All therapies through the venous access ports were well tolerated and no patients reported pain or discomfort. Major complications were seen in nine (20.5%) patients-the majority (n = 7) of which were due to venous access port malfunction-and resolved with catheter revision. One (2.27%) major complication involved an infected venous access port, and one involved a large hematoma at the venous access port site. Minor complications were seen in eight (18.2%) patients, where simple flushing of the catheter with saline or tissue plasminogen activator resolved the issue. CONCLUSION: The dual-chambered venous access port was successfully used for sustained blood flow in apheresis therapy with a moderate, yet correctable complication rate.

Interventions for mycosis fungoides.

BACKGROUND: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease. SEARCH METHODS: We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines. MAIN RESULTS: This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: ​​There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.

Efficacy of Dupilumab in two patients with severe and recalcitrant atopic dermatitis previously treated with extracorporeal photopheresis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex disease and can often be a clinical challenge for dermatologists. When standard immunosuppressive therapies fail, extracorporeal phototherapy (ECP) can be considered as a therapeutic option. In recent years, better understanding of the pathogenesis of AD allowed to improve treatment strategies with many emerging therapeutic options. Currently, Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits IL-4 and IL-13, is the only biological drug authorized for the treatment of severe adult atopic dermatitis, refractory to traditional firstline and secondline therapies. ECP, compared to biological therapy, is associated with some disadvantages: it is costly and time-consuming for patients and personnel to administer. Moreover, it should be noted that the completion of the entire procedure takes about 3 hr and must be done in a hospital, while the administration of Dupilumab can be carried out by patients themselves at home. For these reasons and on the basis of our experience, it would be necessary to evaluate whether all patients with refractory atopic dermatitis in treatment with ECP with unsatisfactory clinical response should be switched to recent available target therapies.

Efficacy of manual lymph drainage plus exercise on range of motion and flexibility in refractory chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host disease: A case report.

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with high morbidity and mortality rates. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of Manual Lymph Drainage (MLD) and a home-based exercise programme on range of motion (ROM) and flexibility in a patient diagnosed with chronic cutaneous GvHD. A 29-year-old male who was diagnosed as acute lymphoblastic leukemia underwent allo-HSCT after induction chemotherapy. He developed extended chronic cutaneous skin GvHD. He received systemic immunosuppressive treatment and Psoralen and ultraviolet radiation (PUVA) for 20 sessions. He was then consulted to physiotherapy department for the limitation of multiple ROM due to severe GvHD. The range of motions of shoulder, elbow, hip, knee and ankle joints were evaluated with universal goniometer. The chair sit, reach and back scratch tests were performed. MLD was applied for 2 weeks. Additionally, exercise recommendations were maintained as a home-programme. After the therapy, ROM values were better in wrist extension and hip abduction/adduction and the back scratch test result improved. According to chair sit and reach tests, the results decreased from 25 to 22cm distance after 2 weeks. With MLD treatment with exercise, ROM has been preserved and even improved in this refractory case. In addition, the flexibility test results were found to be increased. The efficacy of MLD and exercise in chronic cutaneous GvHD should be investigated in further studies.

Real-world use of extracorporeal photopheresis for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in the United States: 2010-2015.

Introduction: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommend extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as systemic therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).Objective: To investigate real-world use of ECP in CTCL patients in the US.Methods: Data from the Truven MarketScan® database (2010-2015) were used to create a cohort of CTCL patients receiving systemic treatment. Multivariable regressions were performed to compare health care resource utilization between ECP and propensity score-matched non-ECP patients.Results: Of the 1106 eligible patients, 117 (10.6%) received ECP, with an average treatment duration of 13.6 months. Psoriasis, organ transplant, graft versus host disease, and scleroderma were the most common comorbidities. ECP was used as monotherapy in 76 patients (65.0%) and combination in 41 patients (35.0%), mostly with interferon and/or a retinoid. Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.6 vs 2.2, p < .05), rates of organ transplant (49.6% vs 7.8%, p < .001), and graft vs host disease (41.9% vs 3.4%, p < .001) were observed in ECP versus non-ECP patients. Post-matching analyses showed that ECP patients had shorter all-cause inpatient stay (6.67 vs 11.80 days, p = .001).Conclusions: Approximately 1 out of 10 CTCL patients receiving systemic treatment were on ECP treatment in the US. Post-matching analysis showed ECP was associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris type I: a systematic review.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is an uncommon papulosquamous inflammatory disease of the skin, which may progress to erythroderma. The diagnosis is based on both clinical and histopathological findings. There are numerous treatment options in the literature, but often reported as unsuccessful. To summarize the therapy of type I PRP in a systematic manner. We performed a systematic search following the PRISMA Guidelines based on PubMed, Web of Science, and Medline databases using the term 'pityriasis rubra pilaris treatment' (in German and English) on human subjects, published between 1997 and 2017, documenting therapy for PRP type I. A total of 449 records were identified; 148 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 105 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. We identified mainly individual case reports, a few retrospective studies, and small case series. No randomized controlled trials were found. Treatment options included topical and systemic agents, and physical modalities. Based on our review, we suggest a continuous topical treatment and, when appropriate, in combination with phototherapy. As first-line therapy, we recommend a retinoid, and as second-line, a combination of retinoid and methotrexate (considering the patient's condition and side effects), azathioprine, or cyclosporine A. Biologicals can be used as third-line therapy. In case of treatment failure, biologicals can be combined with a retinoid, methotrexate, or cyclosporine A. Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed in order to provide an evidence-based high-quality standardized treatment for patients with PRP type I.

Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma: A Difficult Diagnosis Demystified.

Cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) represents a heterogeneous group of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas in which monoclonal T lymphocytes infiltrate the skin. The mechanism of CTCL development is not fully understood, but likely involves dysregulation of various genes and signaling pathways. A variety of treatment modalities are available, and although they can induce remission in most patients, the disease may recur after treatment cessation. Owing to relatively low incidence and significant chronicity of disease, and the high morbidity of some therapeutic regimens, further clinical trials are warranted to better define the ideal treatment option for each subtype of CTCL.

Iron deficiency anemia associated with extracorporeal photopheresis: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is associated with few adverse effects. We have anecdotally noted patients treated with long-term ECP develop iron deficiency anemia (IDA). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients who received ECP for any indication at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Clinic Arizona. The primary objective was to describe the cumulative incidence of IDA at 1 year of ECP therapy. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were eligible for analysis. Graft-vs-host disease was the most common indication for ECP (n = 76, 61.8%). At 1 year of ECP therapy, the cumulative incidence of IDA was 24.1% (95% CI, 14.2%-32.9%). At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of IDA was 68.3% (95% CI, 38%-83.8%). Risk factors for the development of IDA included: cumulative number of ECP sessions (HR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.05-1.73 per 10 additional sessions, P = .022), an indication for ECP of solid organ transplant rejection (compared to cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, HR 5.46, 95% CI, 2.06-14.49, P < .001), and proton pump inhibitor use at baseline (HR 2.15, 95% CI, 1.1-4.21, P = .03). Iron supplementation was initiated in 29 of 37 evaluable patients who developed IDA, with a cumulative incidence of supplementation in 77.2% patients within 3 months of recognition of IDA (95% CI, 55.8%-88.3%). Hemoglobin normalized in 50.1% of patients started on iron supplementation for IDA within 7 months (95% CI, 25.2%-66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Iron deficiency anemia is common in patients receiving long-term ECP and occurs throughout ECP therapy. IDA resolved with iron supplementation in half of patients.

Immunotherapy for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Current Landscape and Future Developments.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are chronic, progressive primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) for which there are no curative treatments. Skin-directed therapies, such as phototherapy, radiation therapy, or topical nitrogen mustard, provide only short-term remissions. Numerous attempts with different chemotherapeutic regimes failed to achieve meaningful clinical responses. Immunotherapy seems to be a promising avenue to achieve long-term disease control in CTCL. There is compelling evidence indicating that MF and SS are immunogenic lymphomas, which can be recognized by the patient's immune system. However, CTCL uses different strategies to impair host's immunity, eg, via repolarizing the T-cell differentiation from type I to type II, recruiting immunosuppressive regulatory T-cells, and limiting the repertoire of lymphocytes in the circulation. Many currently used therapies, such as interferon-α, imiquimod, extracorporeal phototherapy, and allogeneic bone marrow transplant, seem to exert their therapeutic effect via activation of the antitumor cytotoxic response and reconstitution of the host's immune system. It is likely that novel immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and chimeric antigen receptor-T cells will help to manage CTCL more efficiently. We also discuss how current genomic techniques, such as estimating the mutational load by whole genome sequencing and neoantigen calling, are likely to provide clinically useful information facilitating personalized immunotherapy of CTCL.

Management of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: Established and emergent therapies.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is an uncommon group of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma primarily affecting the skin. It is comprised of a variety of entities with different clinical behaviours and prognosis. Mycosis fungoides is the commonest subtype, and Sézary syndrome is a much rarer form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. At this stage, control rather than cure is the goal of therapy, with particular emphasis placed on preserving quality of life. Our review of the efficacy, safety profile and accessibility of treatment modalities for mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome is a tailored guide for the clinician treating these rare conditions.

Treatment of Scleroedema Adultorum Buschke: A Systematic Review.

Scleroedema adultorum Buschke is a rare skin disease, which can be divided into 3 subtypes: classic type, occurring after respiratory infections; a type lacking association with infections; and a type associated with diabetes. Scleroedema adultorum Buschke is characterized by thickening and tightening of the skin, which typically starts at the neck. In half of patients, spontaneous remission may occur. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize all reported treatments for scleroedema adultorum Buschke, based on articles from PubMed database, using the query "scleroedema adultorum Buschke treatment", English and German, published between 1970 and 2016 and documenting adequate treatments. The results are based mainly on individual case reports, small case series, and retrospective studies often reporting unsuccessful results. Treatment options include topical as well as systemic treatments, and physical modalities. There is a need for randomized controlled trials and studies on long-term outcomes after treatment.

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy in mycosis fungoides.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal photo-chemotherapy (ECP, photopheresis) is an approved treatment modality for mycosis fungoides (MF). Our aim is to present our ECP data for MF. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 50 MF patients who received ECP for clinical activity, toxicity, and response and outcome rates, and we compared these with combination therapies. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) was 42% (21/50), while the median time to response was 11months (range, 3-48months). Ten of the responders (48%) had 3 or more treatment lines prior to ECP. Eight patients (16%) had adverse events related to ECP. The overall survival (OS) of 50 patients was 72months (range, 3-211). There was no statistically significant difference in the OS in early-stage vs late-stage patients (77 vs 69months, P=0.077). The stage 3 and 4 patients received an average of 31 cycles compared to 55 cycles in stage 1 and 2 patients (P=0.006). The increased extent of ECP was not correlated with the response. Combined treatment with ECP significantly improved the OS (84months vs 62months, P=0.005). DISCUSSION: A low frequency of side effects and improved OS observed in combination therapy makes ECP a favorable option for treating MF.

Cutaneous manifestations of graft-versus-host disease: role of the dermatologist.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the major complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is associated with high mortality in severe cases. The skin is one of the major organs affected in both acute and chronic GVHD. This review aims to elucidate the basic characteristics of GVHD, and the role and contribution of dermatologists in the care of patients with this condition.

75% Complete Response and 15% Partial Response to Extracorporeal Photopheresis Combined With Other Therapies in Resistant Early Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for the treatment of advanced stage or treatment refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) since 1987, and more recently has also been shown to be of benefit for earlier stage resistant CTCL. Complete response rates in prior studies of ECP in early CTCL have ranged from 0% to 40%. METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records of all CTCL patients seen in the University of Kansas Cancer Center between June 2007 and May 2011. International review board approval was obtained. Inclusion criteria were (1) early stage CTCL and (2) ECP treatment. Data included demographics, type of intravenous access employed, CTCL subtype, cytogenetic features, adverse events, adjuvant treatments, and survival time in years. Treatment response was assessed via a modified severity weighted assessment tool (mSWAT). Primary outcome measures were response rates to ECP at 6 months and 12 months after beginning treatment. RESULTS: Of 20 patients (13 female; 7 male), 7 were Stage 1A, 11 were 1B, and 2 were 2A. Seven patients with stable disease and 2 patients with progression at 6 months received adjuvant therapy (PUVA/systemic retinoids/metotrexate/interferon) in addition to ECP. Twelve-month response to ECP was 90%: 15 patients (75%) had complete responses, 3 (15%) had partial responses, 1 had stable disease, and 1 progressed. CONCLUSION: Used alone or in combination with adjuvant treatments, ECP can be an effective treatment method in early stage CTCL.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(10):1212-1216.

Selective photodepletion of malignant T cells in extracorporeal photopheresis with selenorhodamine photosensitizers.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used successfully in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), and other T cell-mediated disorders. Not all patients obtain a significant or durable response from ECP. The design of a selective photosensitizer that spares desirable lymphocytes while targeting malignant T cells may promote cytotoxic T cell responses and improve outcomes after ECP. A series of selenorhodamines built with variations of the Texas red core targeted the mitochondria of malignant T cells, were phototoxic to malignant T cells presumably via their ability to generate singlet oxygen, and were transported by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). To determine the selectivity of the photosensitizers in the ECP milieu, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB)-stimulated and non-stimulated human lymphocytes were combined with HUT-78 cells (a CTCL) to simulate ECP. The amide-containing analogues of the selenorhodamines were transported more rapidly than the thioamide analogues in monolayers of MDCKII-MDR1 cells and, consequently, were extruded more rapidly from P-gp-expressing T cells than the corresponding thioamide analogues. Selenorhodamine 6 with the Texas red core and a piperidylamide functionality was phototoxic to >90% of malignant T cells while sparing >60% of both stimulated and non-stimulated T cells. In the resting T cells, (63±7)% of the CD4+ T cell compartment, and (78±2.5)% of the CD8+ cytotoxic T cell population were preserved, resulting in an enrichment of healthy and cytotoxic T cells after photodepletion.