Advantages of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Posterolateral Approach Combined with Phased Rehabilitation Management for Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has emerged as a pivotal approach for addressing femoral neck fractures (FNFs), a prevalent type of fracture in older people. Restoring joint functionality following surgery significantly contributes to patients' overall well-being. Therefore, the implementation of rational and effective rehabilitation exercises is crucial. Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of phased rehabilitation management on patients with FNFs who have undergone THA. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, a total of 89 patients were enrolled. Among them, 49 patients underwent phased rehabilitation management, while 40 patients received conventional postoperative rehabilitation. The evaluation encompassed a range of assessments, including the Harris Hip Score (HHS) for the evaluation of hip joint function, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) to quantify lower limb muscle strength, the Barthel Index to assess activities of daily living, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure pain intensity. Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were diligently measured to provide a comprehensive understanding of the patient's inflammatory responses. Results: Overall, the study group exhibited a significantly higher average HHS after surgery compared to the control group. Notably, the VAS scores at 1 day and 3 days post-surgery in both groups demonstrated a reduced trend compared to preoperative values. This trend was more significant in the study group compared to the control group. The time taken for the FTSST in patients undergoing phased rehabilitation management was less compared to the control group. Furthermore, phased rehabilitation management was associated with more significant improvements in activities of daily living. Notably, IL-6 levels were higher in both the study and control groups at 1 day postoperatively than before surgery, while they decreased at 3 days postoperatively compared to the 1-day mark. The study group exhibited significantly lower levels of CRP (mg/L) and ESR (mm/h) compared to the control group. Conclusions: Implementing phased rehabilitation management for patients with FNFs following THA improves hip joint function, lower limb muscle strength, daily living activities, pain intensity, and inflammatory response.

Age is Not the Most Important Factor in the Prognosis of Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of Long-Term Clinical Follow-Up.

Objective: The prognosis of femoral neck fractures is affected by factors including age and type of fracture. This study aimed to explore the associations among postsurgical outcomes of internal fixation for femoral neck fracture (healing rate, necrosis rate, and joint function score) and age and type of fracture. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 297 cases of femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation between February 2008 and October 2018. The postoperative femoral neck nonunion rate (a measure of healing) and femoral head necrosis rate were determined by x-ray and computed tomography. The Harris hip score (a measure of joint function and pain) was calculated. The effects of age and fracture type on these factors were analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of femoral head necrosis and postoperative joint function scores among the different age groups. There was a significant difference in the postoperative rate of femoral head necrosis by Garden (P = .001) and Pauwels (P = .01) fracture types. No significant differences were noted for the Harris hip score for fractures characterized by the Pauwels classification (P = .09). However, the Harris hip scores differed significantly among groups for fractures categorized by the Garden classification (P = .001). Conclusions: Fracture type but not age is closely related to femoral head necrosis and Harris hip score after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Efficacy of Femoral Neck System Fixation vs KHS Femoral Neck Dynamic Compression Locking Plate System in Femoral Neck Fracture.

Background: Femoral neck fracture is acknowledged as one of the common injuries in clinical orthopedics. Our study was aimed at investigating the efficacy of femoral neck fixation vs the KHS dynamic compression locking plate system in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Methods: This was a prospective study. A toteal of 90 patients with femoral neck fracture who were admitted to The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University in Shijiazhuang, China from August 2017 to March 2020 were enrolled in our study. The patients were randomly divided into the control group (45 patients allocated to intervention with the novel femoral neck dynamic compression locking plate system) and the study group (45 patients who underwent femoral neck system fixation). Intraoperative blood loss, surgery duration, fracture healing time and related complications in the 2 groups were monitored and evaluated. The recovery of hip joint function at different times in the 2 groups were closely monitored. Results: The 2 groups completed the surgery process, and the incision healed. All patients were followed up for 6 to 8 months, with an average follow-up time of 7.01 ± 0.21 months. Surgery duration, length of hospital stay and fracture healing time in the study group were significantly lower than in the control group (P < .05), while no significant difference was found in intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups (P > .05). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, hip joint function in the study group was significantly higher than in the control group (P < .05), but 6 months after surgery, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). There were no complications in the study group, whereas 1 patient had a complication in the control group. The total incidence of complications in the study group was lower than in the control group, but the difference was not significant (P > .05). Conclusion: Femoral neck system fixation demonstrated superior efficacy to the KHS femoral neck dynamic compression locking plate system in femoral neck fracture, and is considered as a valid method for wide application.

Factores de riesgo asociados a luxación en el paciente con fractura del cuello femoral: estudio de casos y controles / Risk factors associated to prosthetic hip dislocation in patients with femur neck fracture: a case-control study

Introducción La luxación tras una cirugía de artroplastia de cadera es una temible complicación que se ha presentado desde el desarrollo de la técnica. Se han realizado múltiples estudios comparativos que intentan aclarar cuáles son los factores que influyen en este suceso adverso. Métodos En nuestro caso hemos llevado a cabo un estudio retrospectivo analizando 476 pacientes, que han sido divididos en función de si habían sufrido un episodio de luxación o no y llevando a cabo un análisis estadístico de las posibles variables que podrían haber afectado en ello; diseñándose así un estudio de casos y controles. Resultados y conclusiones En nuestro estudio hemos obtenido que la enfermedad mental aumenta hasta 6 veces más el riesgo de sufrir un episodio de luxación tras someterse al paciente a una artroplastia de cadera por fractura (OR 6,429; IC 95% 1,568 - 26,361), al igual que el hecho de padecer una infección post-quirúrgica (OR 11,667; IC 95% 2,147 - 63,394). No obstante, sería adecuado realizar más estudios para su confirmación, al igual que el hecho de realizar estudios con un mayor tamaño muestral podrían apoyar o rebatir nuestros hallazgos. (AU)

Introduction Dislocation after a hip arthroplasty is a terrible complication that has been present since the technique was developed. Many studies have been developed in order to see which risk factors affect on this adverse effect. Methods We have made a retrospective study, analysing 476 patients. They have been divided in two groups, one if they have suffered from prosthetic hip dislocation and the other if they have not. After that, we did a stadistical analysys of posible risk factors, designing a case-control study. Results and conclusión In our study, we have found that mental illness increseases up to 6 times the risk of suffering a hip dislocation (OR 6,429; IC 95% 1,568 - 26,361). We also found relation with suffering from an acu-te infection (OR 11,667; IC 95% 2,147 - 63,394). However, more studies, or with a bigger popula-tion should be performed in order to make a statement. (AU)

Combined Deflection Angle Classification: A Novel Typing System of Adult Femoral Neck Fracture.

OBJECTIVE: Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is a common clinical trauma with high mortality and disability rates. Furthermore, its incidence increases exponentially with increasing age. Existing classifications have some disadvantages. Thus, this study aimed to establish a novel typing system for FNF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all adult patients with FNF admitted to our hospital between December 2015 and November 2017 for cannulated screw internal fixation. The study population was divided into the femoral varus offset group (VAR) and the valgus offset group (VAL). The data collected included sex, age, affected side, injury mode, body mass index, complications, pelvic incidence (PI), hip deflection angle (HDA), combined deflection angle (CDA), and neck shaft angle. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the correlation between complications and deviation angles. A novel typing system was developed and compared with the Garden classification to detect its superiority. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were recruited, with 59 patients in the VAR and 49 patients in the VAL groups. The incidence of complications in the VAR group was significantly higher than that in the VAL group (P < 0.05). Moreover, there were more male participants in the VAR group. Compared with the VAL group, the VAR group had significantly higher PI, HDA, and CDA (P < 0.05). The CDA classification (CDAC) was defined, with CDA as the main criterion and HDA as the supplementary criterion. Furthermore, there was a hierarchical correlation between the actual incidence of complications and the typing level, which was increased in CDAC but not in the Garden classification. This showed that CDAC was more accurate. CONCLUSION: A novel typing system, CDAC, for FNF was established, which was more accurate than the Garden classification. We suggest combining CDAC and Garden classifications for the preoperative diagnosis, treatment selection, and prognostic evaluation for patients with FNF.

Bilateral Nonunion of Femoral Neck Fractures Because of Nutritional Osteomalacia: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: We report 2 cases of atraumatic, bilateral femoral neck fracture nonunions. Both the patients were relatively young and had underlying nutritional osteomalacia. In both cases, valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy was performed along with vitamin D and calcium supplementation. The patients were followed up for an average of 3 years and achieved bone union without any complications. CONCLUSION: Bilateral femoral neck fractures are rare, and bilateral nonunion of femoral neck fractures secondary to osteomalacia is even rarer. Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy can salvage the hip. Correction of underlying osteomalacia by vitamin D and calcium supplementation preceeded surgical intervention in our cases.

Heterotopic Ossification Following Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a frequent complication following hip surgery. Using data from the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemiarthroplasty (HEALTH) trial, we aimed to (1) determine the prevalence of HO following total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture in patients ≥50 years of age, (2) identify whether HO is associated with an increased risk of revision surgery within 24 months after the fracture, and (3) determine the impact of HO on functional outcomes. METHODS: We performed a multivariable Cox regression analysis using revision surgery as the dependent variable and HO as the independent variable. We compared Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores between participants with and those without HO at 24 months. RESULTS: Of 1,441 participants in the study, 287 (19.9%) developed HO within 24 months. HO was not associated with subsequent revision surgery. Grade-III HO was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant deterioration in the total WOMAC score, which was mainly related to the function component of the score, compared with grade I or II. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of grade-III HO on the functional outcomes and quality of life after THA for hip fracture is clinically important, and HO prophylaxis for selected high-risk patients may be appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Profunda femoris pseudoaneurysm rupture post dynamic hip screw fixation after physiotherapy.

This case discusses an elderly female who presented acutely with compromised profunda femoris pseudoaneurysm and massive haematoma five weeks after dynamic hip screw insertion for a left neck of femur fracture. The only precipitating factor leading to this presentation was ongoing physiotherapy. She was referred from a rehabilitation hospital to the nearest vascular surgical unit for acute and definitive surgical intervention. Post-operatively, she fared incredibly well, regaining her baseline level of functioning. History taking is complex in a patient with dementia. Clinical examination should follow with a focused approach to the site of recent operation and also where complications are likely to manifest when an alteration from baseline cognitive function is noted. This is of course in addition to the complete work up required from a holistic perspective with any acute deterioration. Imaging should be arranged and prompt referral made if a treatable acute cause is identified. It is imperative to involve family and/or next of kin if possible, but this should not impede prompt decision-making in the patient's best interests by the clinical team if delays are likely to occur.

Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2): The Exploratory Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes of a Multi-Centre 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial in Young Femoral Neck Fracture Patients.

PURPOSE: Femoral neck fractures in young patients are typically managed with internal fixation using either cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw (SHS). Although fixation preserves the hip joint, patients are still at risk of complications and poor clinical outcomes which lead to diminished function and health related quality of life (HRQL). The Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2) pilot randomized controlled factorial trial evaluated the effect of surgical fixation (cancellous screws vs. SHS) and vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo on patient-reported function and HRQL. METHODS: Patients between the ages of 18-60 years with a femoral neck fracture requiring surgical fixation were eligible. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either a sliding hip screw or cancellous screws for fracture fixation AND vitamin D3 4,000 IU or placebo daily for 6 months. Patient-reported function (Hip Outcome Score) and HRQL (Short Form-12) were assessed at standardized time points in the 12 months following their fixation surgery. Patient-reported function and HRQL were summarized using means, SD, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or percentages and counts. Longitudinal data analysis with mixed models was used to explore the effect of treatment group and time on the patient-reported function and HRQL. RESULTS: 86 of the 91 patients randomized into the FAITH-2 pilot study were deemed eligible. There were no significant differences in patient-reported function or HRQL between the treatment groups at 12 months post-fracture. At the 6- and 9-month assessments, a potential benefit in hip function was seen in the cancellous screw group. In all treatment groups, participants reported lower function and HRQL at 12 months post-fracture as compared to their pre-injury assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Few differences were found in function and HRQL among the treatment groups in the FAITH-2 pilot study. Despite modern implants and vitamin D supplementation, neither function nor HRQL returns to baseline in this population. Additional efforts to improve the outcomes of these challenging injuries are still needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.

Spine Fusions, Yoga Instructors, and Hip Fractures: The Role of Dual Mobility in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased use of dual mobility (DM) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), debate exists regarding the indications for its use. No specific algorithm exists to guide this decision-making process. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to summarize the currently available literature regarding the use of DM in primary THA and provide evidence-based guidelines based on specific patient populations and risk factors for instability. METHODS: We reviewed the current literature for studies evaluating risk factors for dislocation in primary THA, as well as the clinical use and results of DM in primary THA. Based on the strength of the literature, we discuss the use of DM in specific patient populations. We provide a decision-making algorithm to determine whether a patient may be indicated for DM in primary THA. RESULTS: Surgeons should consider preoperative patient demographics, risk factors for instability (eg, significant hip-spine issues), type of procedure to be performed (eg, conversion arthroplasty), and indications for surgery (eg, THA for femoral neck fracture). Based on this algorithmic assessment, DM may be warranted in the primary THA setting if a patient's combined risk reaches an established threshold based on the literature. CONCLUSION: This evidence-based algorithm may help guide current practice in the use of DM in primary THA. We advocate the continued judicious use of DM in hip arthroplasty. Longer term studies are needed in order to evaluate the durability of DM, as well as any complications related to the DM articulation.

Optimal Technical Factors During Operative Management of Low-Energy Femoral Neck Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if cancellous screw (CS) and sliding hip screw (SHS) technical factors during low-energy femoral neck fracture fixation affects a 24-month revision surgery rate and health-related quality of life (HRQL). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled study. SETTING: International, multicenter. PATIENTS: Eight hundred ninety-eight femoral neck fracture patients age 50 years and older. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to fracture stabilization with either CSs or a SHS device as part of the Fixation Using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH) trial. CS technical factors analyzed included screw diameter, short versus long screw threads, screw number and formation, screw orientation, and washer use. SHS technical factors studied were side plate length, supplemental screw use, lag screw position, and tip-apex distance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Revision surgeries within 24 months to promote fracture healing, relieve pain, treat infection, or improve function. In addition, HRQL measures were collected, including the SF-12 Physical Component Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. RESULTS: The 3-screw inverted triangle pattern had a significantly lower revision surgery rate than a 3-screw triangle formation (P = 0.004). No other CS or SHS technical factors were predictive of revision surgery or affected a patient's HRQL (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 3-screw inverted triangle pattern was superior to a 3-screw triangle formation. However, injury and patient factors such as fracture displacement, age, smoking status and sex play a more significant role in clinical outcomes for low-energy femoral neck fracture treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Posterolateral or direct lateral approach for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The posterolateral approach (PLA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) are the most commonly used approaches for inserting a hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. A recent review concluded that the routine use of PLA should be questioned, but this conclusion itself can be questioned. The aim of this study is to provide an updated overview and critical appraisal of the available evidence, focussing on outcomes most relevant for patients. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of literature in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and Cochrane Library. Studies (till June 2018) to identify hip fracture clinical trials/comparative studies comparing alternative surgical approaches (PLA and DLA). We explored sources of heterogeneity and conducted pooled analyses when appropriate. RESULTS: 264 potentially eligible studies were identified of which 1 RCT, 3 prospective, 3 registry data and 5 retrospective studies were included. The RCT consisted performance and attrition bias. The mean MINORS score of the prospective/register studies was 17.3 (SD 3.5) and 13.8 (SD 1.9) of the 5 retrospective studies. The GRADE score for all the outcomes was very low. Due to the high and various types of biases across the included studies, we did not pool the data. None of studies assessed the activities of daily living functionality. 6 studies reported significantly more dislocations or reoperations due to dislocation in the PLA group, 6 other studies found no differences. DLA patients were more likely to develop abductor insufficiency leading to limping and more need for walking aids. The PLA patients tended to have better quality of life, less pain and more satisfaction compared to the DLA patients. CONCLUSION: Based on low-quality studies, PLA may be associated with more dislocations, but patients had less walking problems and a lower tendency to abductor insufficiency compared with DLA. Further clinical trials with methodology rigor are needed to determine which approach is more effective in terms of outcomes relevant to patients.

Fixation Using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2): The Clinical Outcomes of a Multicenter 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial in Young Femoral Neck Fracture Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the fixation method and vitamin D supplementation affect the risk of patient-important outcomes within 12 months of injury in nongeriatric femoral neck fracture patients. DESIGN: A pilot factorial randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Fifteen North American clinical sites. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one adults 18-60 years of age with a femoral neck fracture requiring surgical fixation. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to a surgical intervention (sliding hip screw or cancellous screws) and a vitamin D intervention (vitamin D3 4000 IU daily vs. placebo for 6 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary clinical outcome was a composite of patient-important complications (reoperation, femoral head osteonecrosis, severe femoral neck malunion, and nonunion). Secondary outcomes included fracture-healing complications and radiographic fracture healing. RESULTS: Eighty-six participants with a mean age of 41 years were included. We found no statistically significant difference in the risk of patient-important outcomes between the surgical treatment arms (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.40-2.02, P = 0.80) and vitamin D supplementation treatment arms (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.42-2.18, P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: These pilot trial results continue to describe the results of current fixation implants, inform the challenges of improving outcomes in this fracture population, and may guide future vitamin D trials to improve healing outcomes in young fracture populations. Although the pilot trial was not adequately powered to detect treatment effects, publishing these results may facilitate future meta-analyses on this topic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association Between Uncemented vs Cemented Hemiarthroplasty and Revision Surgery Among Patients With Hip Fracture.

IMPORTANCE: Consensus guidelines and systematic reviews have suggested that cemented fixation is more effective than uncemented fixation in hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Given that these recommendations are based on research performed outside the United States, it is uncertain whether these findings also reflect the US experience. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes associated with cemented vs uncemented hemiarthroplasty in a large US integrated health care system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of 12 491 patients aged 60 years and older who underwent hemiarthroplasty treatment of a hip fracture between 2009 and 2017 at 1 of the 36 hospitals owned by Kaiser Permanente, a large US health maintenance organization. Patients were followed up until membership termination, death, or the study end date of December 31, 2017. EXPOSURES: Hemiarthroplasty (prosthetic replacement of the femoral head) fixation via bony growth into a porous-coated implant (uncemented) or with cement. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was aseptic revision, defined as any reoperation performed after the index procedure involving exchange of the existing implant for reasons other than infection. Secondary outcomes were mortality (in-hospital, postdischarge, and overall), 90-day medical complications, 90-day emergency department visits, and 90-day unplanned readmissions. RESULTS: Among 12 491 patients in the study cohort who underwent hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture (median age, 83 years; 8660 women [69.3%]), 6042 (48.4%) had undergone uncemented fixation and 6449 (51.6%) had undergone cemented fixation, and the median length of follow-up was 3.8 years. In the multivariable regression analysis controlling for confounders, uncemented fixation was associated with a significantly higher risk of aseptic revision (cumulative incidence at 1 year after operation, 3.0% vs 1.3%; absolute difference, 1.7% [95% CI, 1.1%-2.2%]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.77 [95% CI, 1.43-2.19]; P < .001). Of the 6 prespecified secondary end points, none showed a statistically significant difference between groups, including in-hospital mortality (1.7% for uncemented fixation vs 2.0% for cemented fixation; HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.73-1.21]; P = .61) and overall mortality (cumulative incidence at 1 year after operation: 20.0% for uncemented fixation vs 22.8% for cemented fixation; HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.90-1.01]; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with hip fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty in a large US integrated health care system, uncemented fixation, compared with cemented fixation, was associated with a statistically significantly higher risk of aseptic revision. These findings suggest that US surgeons should consider cemented fixation in the hemiarthroplasty treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the absence of contraindications.

The effectiveness of preoperative colon cleansing on post-operative surgical site infection after hip hemiarthroplasty.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mechanical bowel preparation in elderly patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty in a single training institution over a period of 2 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a prospective-randomised manner. All patients, who underwent primary hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in our institution between 20 February 2015 and 29 December 2016, were included. B.T. Enema (sodium dihydrogen phosphate + disodium hydrogen phosphate) 135 ml (Yenisehir Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey) was used for colon cleansing. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were followed up for at least 1 year after surgery (16.3 ± 4.2 months). Of these, 46 were in the enema group and 49 were in the control group. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Infection rates between the two groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). In addition, ASA, age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, duration of surgery, time to surgery, ambulation status and blood count did not have a significant effect on surgical site infections (p > 0.05). However, all infections in the enema group were monobacterial and were successfully treated, whereas two of the four infections in the control group were polymicrobial and could not be successfully treated. CONCLUSION: Although preoperative colon cleansing did not reduce the overall incidence of post-operative infections, our study suggested that it may reduce polymicrobial infections after hip hemiarthroplasty. Polymicrobial infections after hip hemiarthroplasty seem to have worse prognosis. Therefore, the effectiveness of preoperative colon cleansing in remediating such infections must be investigated in a larger number of patients.

Supplementation of enteral nutritional powder decreases surgical site infection, prosthetic joint infection, and readmission after hip arthroplasty in geriatric femoral neck fracture with hypoalbuminemia.

BACKGROUND: Nearly half of elderly patients with hip fracture were malnourished, indicated with a serum marker of hypoalbuminemia. Malnutrition was a risk factor for poor outcomes in geriatrics after hip replacement. The purpose of this study was to investigate if oral nutritional supplementation after the procedure in geriatrics with hypoalbuminemia was beneficial for outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of older (≥ 65 years old) patients suffering femoral neck fracture and undergoing hip replacement with hypoalbuminemia was conducted. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without postoperative nutritional supplementation. RESULTS: There were 306 geriatric patients met the criteria. Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients with nutritional supplementation showed a lower grade of wound effusion with adjusted OR 0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36 to 0.91, P < 0.05). And also a lower rate of surgical site infection (5.5% compared with 13.0% [adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.91, P < 0.05]), periprosthetic joint infection (2.8% compared with 9.9% [adjusted OR 0.26, 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.79, P < 0.05]), and 30 days readmission (2.1% compared with 8.7% [adjusted OR 0.22, 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.79, P < 0.05]). The average total hospital stay was longer in patients without nutritional supplementation (10.7 ± 2.0 compared with 9.2 ± 1.8 days, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that postoperative nutritional supplementation is a protective factor for surgical site infection, periprosthetic joint infection, and 30-days readmission in geriatric with hypoalbuminemia undergoing a hip replacement. Postoperative nutritional supplementation for these patients should be recommended.

Is bone-cement augmentation of screw-anchor fixation systems superior in unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVES: Improved fixation techniques with optional use of bone cements for implant augmentation have been developed to enhance stability and reduce complication rates after osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures. This biomechanical study aimed to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on implant anchorage and overall performance of screw-anchor fixation systems in unstable femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora were used to create standardized femoral neck fractures (Pauwels type 3 fractures; AO/OTA 31-B2) with comminution and were fixed by means of a rotationally stable screw-anchor (RoSA) system. The specimens were assigned pairwise to two groups and either augmented with PMMA-based cement (Group 1, augmented) or left without such augmentation (Group 2, control). Biomechanical testing, simulating physiological loading at four distinct load levels, was performed over 10.000 cycles for each level with the use of a multidimensional force-transducer system. Data was analysed by means of motion tracking. RESULTS: Stiffness, femoral head rotation, implant migration, femoral neck shortening, and failure load did not differ significantly between the two groups (p ≥ .10). For both groups, the main failure type was dislocation in the frontal plane with consecutive varus collapse). In the cement-augmented specimens, implant migration and femoral neck shortening were significantly dependent on bone mineral density (BMD), with higher values in osteoporotic bones. There was a correlation between failure load and BMD in cement-augmented specimens. CONCLUSION: In screw-anchor fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures, bone-cement augmentation seems to show no additional advantages in regard to stiffness, rotational stability, implant migration, resistance to fracture displacement, femoral neck shortening or failure load.

Abordaje de Smith Petersen modificado para fracturas de cuello femoral Pauwels III - Garden IV / Modified Smith Petersen approach to femoral neck fracture Pauwels III - Garden IV

El abordaje de Smith Petersen modificado (SPM), permite la reducción de fracturas del cuello femoral desde anterior, manteniendo la fijación a través de un abordaje lateral. Realizar la reducción bajo visión directa mejoraría la calidad de la reducción y los resultados en fracturas complejas de cuello femoral. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de ocho pacientes con fracturas de cuello femoral Pauwels III/Garden IV secundarias a un accidente de alta energía operadas con abordaje SPM. Registramos el tiempo de evolución desde el accidente hasta la cirugía. Se realizó radiografía y tomografía axial computada postoperatoria. Seguimos los pacientes con radiografías mensuales hasta evidenciar consolidación de la fractura y casos de necrosis avascular. RESULTADOS: En promedio, los pacientes fueron operados 2,1 días tras el accidente y fueron seguidos con una mediana de 24,5 meses tras su cirugía. Siete de los ocho pacientes consolidaron. Sólo un caso presentó una no-unión que requirió de una prótesis total de cadera. No hubo casos de necrosis avascular. CONCLUSIÓN: Las fracturas de cuello femoral de alta energía en pacientes jóvenes son lesiones poco frecuentes. Aunque esta serie es pequeña, llama la atención que tratándose de lesiones desplazadas y con rasgos verticales no observamos casos de necrosis avascular, a pesar de algunos casos con prolongado tiempo de evolución desde el accidente hasta la cirugía. Creemos que esas fracturas deben operarse lo antes posible, pero que es más importante lograr una reducción anatómica en vez de retrasar algunas horas la cirugía. En nuestra experiencia, el abordaje de SPM facilita la reducción adecuada en fracturas complejas de cuello femoral.

Modified Smith Petersen Approach (MSP) allows an anterior reduction for femoral neck fractures, keeping the fixation through a lateral approach to the hip. Performing the reduction under direct visualization would improve the quality of the reduction and the outcomes in complex fractures of femoral neck. METHODS: Retrospective study including eight patients with femoral neck fracture classified as Pauwels III / Garden IV, in which MSP was performed. We kept record of the time from the accident until the final surgery. Post-operative studies included plain radiograph and CT scan. Monthly radiographic controls were obtained until fracture healing was achieved or radiological signs of avascular necrosis were found. RESULTS: Surgery was performed in an average of 2.1 days after the accident. Postoperative follow-up was an average of 24.5 month. Consolidation was achieved in seven of the eight patients, only one patient evolved into a nonunion of femoral neck which required a total hip arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: High energy femoral neck fractures in young patients are infrequent injuries. Even though this is a small series of patients it comes to our attention that being displaced fractures with vertical fracture lines we didn't find any case of avascular necrosis despite some of the cases the prolonged timing since the accident to surgery. We believe that this type of fracture should be treated as soon as possible but is more important to achieve an anatomical reduction than pass over the 12 hours threshold. In our experience MSP approach facilitates the achievement of an adequate reduction and complex femoral neck fractures.

Hip Fracture Does Not Belong in the Elective Arthroplasty Bundle: Presentation, Outcomes, and Service Utilization Differ in Fracture Arthroplasty Care.

BACKGROUND: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement is the same for hip arthroplasty performed electively for arthritis and urgently for femoral neck fracture. METHODS: An analytic report of hip arthroplasty for a 5-hospital network identified 2362 cases performed from January 2014 to May 2016. Resource utilization was determined using 90-day charges. RESULTS: The fracture population (623 hips) was older (P < .01), had more medical comorbidities (28.3% vs 3.8%, P < .01), and was more likely to be anemic and malnourished (P < .01), and had longer hospital stay (5.7 vs 3.0 days, P < .0001), more frequent intensive care unit admission (4.5% vs 0.5%, P < .01), less frequent discharge to home (16.2% vs 83.6%, P < .01), more emergency department visits (26.5% vs 10.7%, P < .01), and more readmissions after hospital discharge (25.2% vs 12.2%, P < .01). Utilization of services ($50,875 vs $38,705, P < .0001) and the standard deviation of these services ($22,509 vs $9,847, P < .0001), from 90-day charges, were significantly greater in the fracture population. CONCLUSION: This study supports exclusion of fracture care from the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundled payment program.

Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for preventing deep venous thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty following femoral neck fractures: A retrospective comparative study.

Objective This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for preventing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in elderly patients with osteoporosis undergoing initial total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures. Methods Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed to retrospectively compare elderly patients with osteoporosis who underwent initial THA for femoral neck fractures from 2007 to 2015. The patients received peroral rivaroxaban at 10 mg/day for 2 weeks or subcutaneous injections of nadroparin at 0.3 mL/day for 2 weeks until the primary analysis cut-off date. The time to first on-study DVT was the primary endpoint. Results In total, 399 patients were included (rivaroxaban group: n=200; mean age, 70.20 ± 9.16 years and nadroparin group: n = 199; mean age, 69.90 ± 8.87 years), with a mean 3-year follow-up. The time to first on-study DVT was significantly longer in the rivaroxaban than nadroparin group (12 and 5 days, respectively). The incidence of DVT within the 2-week follow-up was significantly higher in the nadroparin than rivaroxaban group (6.8% and 19.7%, respectively), but this difference was no longer present at the final follow-up. Conclusion Rivaroxaban was associated with a significant reduction in the occurrence of first on-study DVT compared with nadroparin.