TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy has gained interest for individuals at high risk for tubo-ovarian cancer as there is compelling evidence that especially high-grade serous carcinoma originates in the fallopian tubes. Two studies have demonstrated a positive effect of salpingectomy on menopause-related quality of life and sexual health compared with standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is non-inferior to the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of tubo-ovarian cancer among individuals at high inherited risk. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that postponement of oophorectomy after salpingectomy, to the age of 40-45 (BRCA1) or 45-50 (BRCA2) years, compared with the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy at age 35-40 (BRCA1) or 40-45 (BRCA2) years, is non-inferior in regard to tubo-ovarian cancer risk. TRIAL DESIGN: In this international prospective preference trial, participants will choose between the novel salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy and the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy. Salpingectomy can be performed after the completion of childbearing and between the age of 25 and 40 (BRCA1), 25 and 45 (BRCA2), or 25 and 50 (BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers) years. Subsequent oophorectomy is recommended at a maximum delay of 5 years beyond the upper limit of the current guideline age for salpingo-oophorectomy. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline age, which is also the recommended age for salpingo-oophorectomy within the study, is 35-40 years for BRCA1, 40-45 years for BRCA2, and 45-50 years for BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Premenopausal individuals with a documented class IV or V germline pathogenic variant in the BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D gene who have completed childbearing are eligible for participation. Participants may have a personal history of a non-ovarian malignancy. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary outcome is the cumulative tubo-ovarian cancer incidence at the target age: 46 years for BRCA1 and 51 years for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. SAMPLE SIZE: The sample size to ensure sufficient power to test non-inferiority of salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy compared with salpingo-oophorectomy requires 1500 BRCA1 and 1500 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Participant recruitment is expected to be completed at the end of 2026 (total recruitment period of 5 years). The primary outcome is expected to be available in 2036 (minimal follow-up period of 10 years). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04294927.

Design of a novel aptamer/molecularly imprinted polymer hybrid modified Ag-Au@Insulin nanoclusters/Au-gate-based MoS2 nanosheet field-effect transistor for attomolar detection of BRCA1 gene.

Early detection of breast cancer, the first main cause of death in women, with robust assay platforms using appropriate biomarkers is of great importance for diagnosis and follow-up of the disease progression. This paper introduces an extra selective and sensitive label-free aptasensor for the screening of BRCA1 gene biomarker by taking advantage of a gate modified with aptamer and molecularly imprinted polymer hybrid (MIP) as a new synthetic receptor film coupled with an electrolyte-gated molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) field-effect transistor (FET). The Au gate surface of FET was modified with insulin stabilized bimetallic Ag-Au@nanoclusters (Ag-Au@InsNCs), after which, the immobilization of the hybridized aptamer and o-phenylenediamine was electropolymerized to form an aptamer-MIP hybrid receptor. The output characteristics of Apta-MIP hybrid modified Au gate MoS2 FET device were followed as a result of change in electrical double layer capacitance of electrolye-gate interface. The magnitude of decrease in the drain current showed a linear response over a wide concentration range of 10 aM to 1 nM of BRCA1 ssDNA with a sensitivity as high as 0.4851 µA/decade of concentration and a limit of detection (LOD) of 3.0 aM while very low responses observed for non-imprinted polymer. The devised aptasensor not only was capable to the discrimination of the complementary versus one-base mismatch BRCA1 ssDNA sequence, but also it could detect the complementary BRCA1 ssDNA in spiked human serum samples over a wide concentration range of 10 aM to 1.0 nM with a low LOD of 6.4 aM and a high sensitivity 0.3718 µA/decade.

Characterization of Patients with Breast Cancer and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Criteria for Performing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Test / Caracterização de Pacientes com Câncer de Mama e Critérios da National Comprehensive Cancer Network para Realização do Teste Genético BRCA1 e BRCA22 / Caracterización de Pacientes con Cáncer de Mama y Criterios de la National Comprehensive Cancer Network para Realizar Prueba Genética de BRCA1 y BRCA

Introduction: Approximately 10% of breast cancer cases are attibutable to germinative mutations in susceptibility genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2 and others. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends screening women with breast cancer for mutations in BRCA1/2 in defined scenarios. However, these genetic tests are unavailable at the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). Objective: This study aimed to characterize women with breast cancer and define the criteria for performing BRCA1/2 test. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, analytic, and retrospective study. Medical records of women diagnosed by SUS with breast cancer between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed through the software JAMOVI (version 2.3 - 2022). Results: A total of 245 women were diagnosed. According to NCCN guidelines, 97 women met the criteria for performing BRCA1/2 test, with mean age of 47 years old, predominantly white (90,7%), with comorbidities (55.6%), premenopausal (59.8%), diagnosed in early stages 0 - IIb (68.2%) and 48.4% had familial history of breast cancer. Most frequent histology and molecular subtype was invasive ductal carcinoma (87.2%) and luminal type (59.8%). Conclusion: A significant number of women diagnosed by SUS had indication for BRCA1/2 test. These women are younger, had fewer comorbidities, not menopausal, and differ in terms of the molecular subtype when compared with those without indication for performing the test

Introdução: Aproximadamente 10% dos casos de câncer de mama são atribuíveis a mutações germinativas em genes de suscetibilidade, incluindo BRCA1 e BRCA2. A National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recomenda a triagem de mulheres com câncer de mama para mutações em BRCA1/2 em cenários definidos. No entanto, esses testes genéticos não estão disponíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Objetivo: Caracterizar as mulheres com câncer de mama e definir os critérios para realização do teste BRCA1/2. Método: Estudo quantitativo, descritivo, analítico e retrospectivo. Foram analisadosprontuários de mulheres com diagnóstico de câncer de mama pelo SUS entre janeiro de 2016 e dezembro de 2018, por meio do software JAMOVI (versão 2.3 - 2022). Resultados: Foram diagnosticadas 245 mulheres. De acordo com as diretrizes da NCCN, 97 mulheres atenderam aos critérios para realizar o teste BRCA1/2, com idade média de 47 anos, predominantemente brancas (90,7%), com comorbidades (55,6%), na pré-menopausa (59,8%), diagnosticadas nos estágios iniciais 0 - IIb (68, 2%), e 48,4% tinham histórico familiar de câncer de mama. A histologia e o subtipo molecular mais frequentes foram carcinoma ductal invasivo (87,2%) e tipo luminal (59,8%). Conclusão: Considerando os critérios da NCCN, um número significativo de mulheres diagnosticadas pelo SUS teve indicação para realização do teste BRCA1/2. Essas mulheres são mais jovens, têm menos comorbidades, estão em período pré-menopausa mais frequentemente e diferem quanto ao subtipo molecular quando comparadas àquelas sem indicação de realização do exame. Palavras-chave: neoplasias da mama; neoplasias ovarianas; síndrome hereditária de câncer de mama e ovário; genes, BRCA1

Introducción: Aproximadamente el 10% de los casos de cáncer de mama son atribuibles a mutaciones germinales en genes de susceptibilidad, incluidos BRCA1 y BRCA2. La National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recomienda la detección de mutaciones BRCA1/2 en mujeres con cáncer de mama en entornos definidos. Sin embargo, estas pruebas genéticas no están disponibles en el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS). Objetivo: Caracterizar mujeres con cáncer de mama y definir los criterios para la realización de la prueba BRCA1/2. Método: Estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, analítico y retrospectivo. Las historias clínicas de las mujeres diagnosticadas con cáncer de mama entre enero de 2016 y diciembre de 2018, usuarias del SUS, fueron analizadas mediante el software JAMOVI (versión 2.3 - 2022). Resultados: 245 mujeres fueron diagnosticadas. Según las pautas de NCCN, 97 mujeres cumplieron con los criterios para someterse a la prueba BRCA1/2. Las mujeres con indicación para la prueba tenían un promedio de edad de 47 años, eran predominantemente blancas (90,7%), con comorbilidades (55,6%), premenopáusicas (59,8%), diagnosticadas en estadios tempranos 0 - IIb (68,2%) y 48,4% tenía antecedentes familiares de cáncer de mama. Los subtipos histológicos y moleculares más frecuentes fueron el carcinoma ductal invasivo (87,2%) y el tipo luminal (59,8%). Conclusión: Considerando los criterios de la NCCN, un número significativo de mujeres, usuarias del SUS, fueron designadas para hacer la prueba BRCA1/2. Estas mujeres son más jóvenes, tienen menos comorbilidades, están en el periodo de la premenopausia con mayor frecuencia y difieren en el subtipo molecular en comparación con aquellas sin orden de realizarse la prueba

Primary care physician referral practices regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling in a major health system.

PURPOSE: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends primary care physicians refer patients at high risk for BRCA1/2 mutations to genetic testing when appropriate. The objective of our study was to describe referrals for BRCA1/2 testing in a large integrated health system and to assess factors associated with referral. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes female patients between 18 and 50 years who had a primary care visit in the Cleveland Clinic Health System between 2010 and 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate differences in the odds of a woman being referred for BRCA1/2 testing by patient factors and referring physician specialty. We also assessed variation in referrals by physicians. RESULTS: Among 279,568 women, 5% were high risk. Of those, 22% were referred for testing. Black patients were significantly less likely to be referred than white patients (aOR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77, 0.98) and Jewish patients were more likely to be referred than non-Jewish patients (aOR 2.13; 95% CI 1.68, 2.70). Patients primarily managed by OB/GYN were significantly more likely to be referred than those cared for via Internal/Family Medicine (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.30, 1.61). Less than a quarter of primary care physicians ever referred a patient for testing. CONCLUSION: The majority of primary care patients at high risk for a BRCA1/2 mutation were not referred for testing, and over a decade, most physicians never referred a single patient. Internal/Family Medicine physicians, in particular, need support in identifying and referring women who could benefit from testing.

Schleichera oleosa Seed Extract Reduced the Proliferation of Breast Cancer by Regulating the BRCA1 and p16 Genes.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in females worldwide. Schleichera oleosa (kusum tree) belongs to the Sapindaceae family commonly found in many states of India. This plant is traditionally being used in various pathological conditions. METHODS: In vitro studies were performed using seed extract of Schleichera oleosa. Different concentrations of seed extracts were treated on MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and its effect on migration and colony formation were observed. BRCA1 and p16 gene expression was analyzed by real-time PCR and Western blotting. RESULTS: We have analyzed anticancer and anti-metastatic effects of seed extract in breast cancer and IC50 was 140µg/ml concentration. Further, its inhibitory role in cell migration and colony formation was at 140µg/ml (P<0.0001) concentration and reduced significantly growth of sphere at 140 µg (P<0.0031) and 150µg (P<0.0010) concentration after 5 days of treatment. The apoptosis study was shown a significant increase at 140 µg (P<0.0001) in apoptotic cells. Expression of BRCA1 and p16 were found to be over-expressed as 1.4 and 1.7 fold, respectively, at 140µg/ml concentration after 24 h of treatment at the transcription level. BRCA1 protein was up-regulated but p16 expression down-regulated at 140 to 150µg/ml (One-Way ANOVA, P<0.0001) concentration. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found a significant role of S. Oleosa seed extract has an anti-cancer as well as anti-metastatic via up-regulation of BRCA1 and p16 genes in breast cancer cells.

Mutations of BRCA1/2 Genes in the West of Turkey and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.

BACKGROUND: Mutations of the BRCA1/2 genes are associated with increased breast and ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the founder mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in the Turkish population in the Aegean region as well as their genotype-phenotype correlations. METHODS: All the patients were provided with BRCA1/2 testing criteria according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. QIAseq Targeted DNA Panels were used for the BRCA1/2 coding regions. RESULTS: Of the 181 studied patients, 38 (21%) were found to carry pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations, while 20 (11%) patients were found to carry variants of unknown significance. The most common pathogenic mutations were NM_000059.4:c.2765dup in the BRCA2 gene and NM_007300.4:c.981_982del and NM_007294.3:c. 5266dup in the BRCA1 gene. p.Lys3326* was the most frequently detected variant of unknown significance (6/ 181). Regarding genotype-phenotype correlations, the NM_007300.4:c.981_982del mutation in BRCA1 gene was found to be milder in terms of breast cancer. The most frequent cancers other than those related to BRCA genes, observed in the relatives of the patients who had pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance, were endometrium cancer and leukemia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NM_007294.3:c.5266dup was found to be a candidate founder mutation in the Turkish population. NM_007300.4:c.981_982del mutation seems to have a milder course in terms of breast cancer. A significantly increased frequency of p.Lys3326* variant in breast cancer and ovarian cancer patients compared with that in the 1,000 Genomes Project suggesting that this variant has a slight effect on BRCA2 function.

Effect of Inquiry-Based Stress Reduction on Well-being and Views on Risk-Reducing Surgery Among Women With BRCA Variants in Israel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The high risk for breast and ovarian cancers conferred by being a carrier of BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline variant can negatively impact physical and psychological well-being. Novel nonpharmacological interventions on well-being in women with BRCA variants have rarely been reported. Objective: To determine the effect of a 12-week inquiry-based stress reduction (IBSR) program on psychological well-being, sleep quality, psychosocial variables, and attitudes toward risk-reducing surgical procedures among women in Israel who carried BRCA variants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial had a 12-week intervention period and a 12-week follow-up period. It was conducted between April 1, 2017, and July 31, 2020. Participants were recruited from the Meirav Breast Center at the Sheba Medical Center, Israel, and the intervention was conducted in Tel Aviv, Israel. The cohort included women with BRCA variants. Data were analyzed from August 1 to December 1, 2020. Interventions: Women were randomly assigned to the 12-week IBSR program or standard care. The IBSR technique is based on the skills of mindfulness, inquiry, and cognitive reframing. The intervention included standardized, weekly group meetings conducted throughout 12 weeks. Standard care included semi-annual breast examinations and breast magnetic resonance imaging (alternating), a gynecological examination, a transvaginal ultrasonographic examination, and CA-125 serum determination. Differences between the groups were tested using mixed-effects models in an intent to treat analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was psychological well-being, including 6 parameters: autonomy, personal growth, positive relationships, control of the environment, goals in life, and self-acceptance. Secondary outcomes included sleep quality, attitudes toward risk-reducing surgical procedures, and psychosocial variables. Questionnaires were administered at baseline (T1), at completion of the 12-week intervention (T2), and 12 weeks after completion of the intervention (T3). Results: Overall, 100 women (mean [SD] age, 41.37 [11.06] years) completed the study, with 50 randomized to the intervention group and 50 randomized to the control group. Mean (SD) time from variant discovery was 4.7 (3.3) years. There were no differences between the intervention and control groups in baseline mean (SD) scores of psychological well-being parameters (autonomy: 55.20 [11.12] vs 56.77 [9.90]; environmental control: 56.30 [11.98 vs 58.51 [11.41]; positive relationships: 63.10 [15.91] vs 68.10 [9.86]; goals in life: 60.00 [14.12] vs 64.82 [10.57]; self-acceptance: 55.02 [16.62] vs 60.32 [13.50]) except personal growth (63.70 [14.66] vs 68.85 [8.07]). The IBSR group, compared with the control group, experienced better mean (SD) scores on all psychological well-being parameters at T2 (autonomy: 63.64 [8.35] vs 54.73 [10.41]; environmental control: 63.95 [10.05] vs 57.45 [11.43]; personal growth: 73.00 [8.34] vs 65.76 [10.95]; positive relationships 71.17 [9.99] vs 65.06 [12.58]; goals in life: 67.57 [8.88] vs 61.18 [12.87]; self-acceptance: 66.93 [11.15] vs 58.09 [15.55]) and at T3 (autonomy: 62.68 [9.05] vs 56.12 [10.64]; environmental control: 64.55 [10.28] vs 59.35 [12.98]; personal growth: 72.00 [8.06] vs 67.15 [11.82]; positive relationships: 71.24 [9.78] vs 66.92 [12.37]; goals in life: 68.33 [8.54] vs 62.92 [13.24]; self-acceptance: 66.84 [11.35] vs 58.97 [17.03]). Individuals in the IBSR group also experienced statistically significant improvements in sleep quality (mean [SD]: T1, 7.35 [3.97]; T3, 4.63 [3.21], P < .001), whereas the control group experienced no statistically significant difference. Women in the intervention group had a more favorable consideration of risk-reducing oophorectomy, from 7 women (14%) who refused to consider oophorectomy at T1 to 1 woman (2%) who refused to consider it at T3 (P = .04), and similar change in consideration of mastectomy: from 23 women (46%) who refused to consider mastectomy at T1 to 13 women (29%) who refused to consider it at T3 (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that IBSR improved psychological well-being and led to a more favorable view on risk-reducing surgical procedures for at least 6 months among women in Israel who carried BRCA variants. These results suggest that IBSR may be implemented as a self-practice tool to enhance the well-being of individuals who carry BRCA variants and support them in their decision-making processes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162276.

Development and Pilot Implementation of the Genomic Risk Assessment for Cancer Implementation and Sustainment (GRACIAS) Intervention in Mexico.

PURPOSE: Genomic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) is standard-of-care practice that uses genomic tools to identify individuals with increased cancer risk, enabling screening for early detection and cancer prevention interventions. GCRA is not available in most of Mexico, where breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer death and ovarian cancer has a high mortality rate. METHODS: Guided by an implementation science framework, we piloted the Genomic Risk Assessment for Cancer Implementation and Sustainment (GRACIAS) intervention, combining GCRA training, practice support, and low-cost BRCA1/2 (BRCA) gene testing at four centers in Mexico. The RE-AIM model was adapted to evaluate GRACIAS intervention outcomes, including reach, the proportion of new patients meeting adapted National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria who participated in GCRA. Barriers to GCRA were identified through roundtable sessions and semistructured interviews. RESULTS: Eleven clinicians were trained across four sites. Mean pre-post knowledge score increased from 60% to 67.2% (range 53%-86%). GCRA self-efficacy scores increased by 31% (95% CI, 6.47 to 55.54; P = .02). Participant feedback recommended Spanish content to improve learning. GRACIAS promoted reach at all sites: 77% in Universidad de Guadalajara, 86% in Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 90% in Tecnológico de Monterrey, and 77% in Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Overall, a pathogenic BRCA variant was identified in 15.6% (195 of 1,253) of patients. All trainees continue to provide GCRA and address barriers to care. CONCLUSION: We describe the first project to use implementation science methods to develop and deliver an innovative multicomponent implementation intervention, combining low-cost BRCA testing, comprehensive GCRA training, and practice support in Mexico. Scale-up of the GRACIAS intervention will promote risk-appropriate care, cancer prevention, and reduction in related mortality.

Uptake and timing of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

BACKGROUND: In women with BRCA mutations, risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy has been shown to decrease gynecologic cancer-specific and overall mortality. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients with BRCA mutations undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between the ages of 35 and 40 years for BRCA1 mutation carriers and between the ages of 40 and 45 years for BRCA2 mutation carriers or after childbearing is complete. Currently, uptake and timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and reasons for delays in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate uptake and timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations concerning the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and reasons for delays in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective chart review, we identified women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations who discussed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with a provider between 2012 and 2021. Uptake of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was documented, and patients were classified as having timely or delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. For those with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, reasons cited for delay were collected. Comparative statistical analyses were performed to evaluate characteristics of those with timely vs delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations among factors related to timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. RESULTS: We identified 638 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers seen between 2012 and 2021. Of these patients, 306 (48.0%) had undergone risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 332 (52.0%) had not. When evaluating the timing of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 136 (21.3%) underwent timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 239 (37.5%) had delays in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 263 (41.2%) had not undergone risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy but were younger than the National Comprehensive Cancer Network age guidelines; therefore, they were neither timely nor delayed. Patients with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were significantly older at the time of genetic testing than those with timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (mean, 49.8 vs 36.3 years; P<.001). Of the 306 patients who underwent risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, those with delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had a significantly shorter interval between BRCA identification and risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy than those with timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (median, 8.7 vs 17.6 months; P<.001). Patients with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were more likely to have a personal history of cancer than those with timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (49.8% vs 37.5%; P=.028). Of the 239 women with delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 188 (78.7%) had delayed BRCA mutation identification, 29 (12.1%) had menopausal concerns, 17 (7.1%) had ongoing cancer treatment, 12 (5.0%) had coordination with breast surgery, 20 (8.4%) had miscellaneous reasons, and 19 (7.9%) had no reason documented. In the multivariate model, older age at BRCA diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.78; P<.001) was significantly associated with delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy timing; those with BRCA2 mutation type were 7.54 times as likely to have timely risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy than BRCA1 mutation carriers (odds ratio, 7.54; 95% confidence, 3.70-16.42; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Nearly 38% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers undergo or have yet to undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy over the recommended National Comprehensive Cancer Network age. The most common reason for the delay in risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was delayed identification of BRCA mutation, noted in 79% of patients with delayed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Timely genetic testing for eligible patients can increase appropriately timed risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancer and reduction of mortality in BRCA mutation carriers.

Frequency and spectrum of mutations across 94 cancer predisposition genes in African American women with invasive breast cancer.

African American women are at increased risk of being diagnosed at a young age and/or with triple negative breast cancer, both factors which are included in current guidelines for identifying women who may benefit from genetic testing. Commercial breast cancer predisposition genetic panels, based largely on data derived from women of European ancestry, may not capture the full spectrum of cancer predisposition genes associated with breast cancer in African American women. Between 2001 and 2018, 488 unselected African American women with invasive breast cancer enrolled in the Clinical Breast Care Project. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Hereditary Cancer testing criteria version 1.2020 were applied to determine genetic risk. Targeted sequencing was performed using the TruSight Cancer panel and variants classified using the ClinVar database. Using NCCN criteria, 64.1% of African American women would be eligible for genetic testing. Fifty pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations were detected in 19 genes with the highest frequencies in BRCA2 (29.4%) and BRCA1 (15.7%). Mutation frequencies in test-eligible and test-ineligible women were 13.1% and 3.5%, respectively. One-third of women harbored variants that could not be classified. While these data do not suggest a need to expand current commercial gene panels, NCCN criteria would fail to identify 12.5% of African American women with mutations in hereditary cancer predisposing genes.

Germline genetic testing in breast cancer: Rationale for the testing of all women diagnosed by the age of 60 years and for risk-based testing of those older than 60 years.

Approximately 5% to 10% of women diagnosed with breast cancer will have a pathogenic variant (PV) in a hereditary cancer susceptibility gene, and this has significant implications for the management of these patients and their relatives. Despite the benefits of genetic testing, many eligible patients with breast cancer never undergo testing because of various barriers, including complicated testing criteria such as those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). In 2019, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) proposed germline genetic testing for all patients with breast cancer to increase the identification of PV carriers. In 2020, a Mayo Clinic study highlighted the limitations of these 2 genetic testing guidelines (NCCN and ASBrS) and proposed a hybrid approach of testing all women diagnosed with breast cancer by the age of 65 years and using NCCN criteria for older patients. This commentary presents an updated analysis of the Mayo Clinic data and discusses the rationale for using the age of 60 years rather than 65 years as the cutoff for this hybrid approach. Using an age at diagnosis of ≤60 or ≤65 years for the universal testing of patients with breast cancer detected more PVs (11.9% [16 of 134] and 15.7% [21 of 134], respectively) in comparison with using the NCCN criteria. Lowering the age for universal testing from 65 to 60 years maintained the sensitivity of detecting a PV at >90% while sparing testing for an additional 10% of women. Compared with the testing of all patients, the hybrid approach would allow 31% of all women with breast cancer to forgo testing and result in fewer variants of uncertain significance identified and, therefore, would decrease the chance of harm from misinterpretation of these variants.

Health Care Disparities and Demand for Expanding Hereditary Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines in African Americans.

BACKGROUND: Genomic medicine has led to significant advancements in the prevention and treatment of cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend BRCA1/2 screening in high-risk individuals; however, the guidelines have not incorporated differences within ethnic cohorts beyond Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity. We analyzed the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in various ethnicities and identified high-risk personal characteristics and family history incorporating differences within ethnic cohorts beyond Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed data collected by a Michigan medical genetic clinic in a community-based hospital from 2008 to 2018. A retrospective chart analysis was conducted of 1090 patients who received genetic counseling regarding hereditary cancer syndromes. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant higher rate of pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in African American patients, at 8.1%, compared to non-Ashkenazi Jewish white patients, at 3.6% (P = .02). African Americans have a mutational prevalence nearing that of the Ashkenazi Jewish population. CONCLUSION: Revision of the NCCN guidelines regarding hereditary cancer syndrome testing in various ethnic groups is imperative and overdue. Future studies are needed to identify health care disparities in and socioeconomic barriers to genetic testing.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gene-positive breast cancer in the United Arab Emirates.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This is the first study to provide data on predisposition of breast cancer susceptibility genes with associated clinical and pathological aspects in the UAE. MATERIAL & METHODS: A retrospective chart review for breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing from 2016 to 2018. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines genetic testing was offered. The analyzed data included; age, ethnicity, family cancer history, pathogenic variant, histopathology, stage, molecular subtype and proliferation. RESULTS: 309 patients underwent genetic testing with a positive result in 130 patients (11.9%) over a period of 36 months. In 34.6% pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were identified. BRCA2 was the most common gene identified. The mean age was 42.9 years (±9.01). Positive family history was identified in 66 patients (50.7%). Majority had stage 1 or 2 disease (66.2%), invasive ductal carcinoma (81.5%) and hormone receptor positive cancer (45.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in the UAE to describe the clinical and pathological characteristics of hereditary breast cancer in a mixed ethnic group with dominant Arabic population. Further genetic studies will be required in the UAE population, as the prevalence of breast cancer continues to rise.

Prognostic factors of overall survival for patients with FIGO stage IIIc or IVa ovarian cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery: A multicenter cohort analysis from the FRANCOGYN study group.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors of overall survival in patients with FIGO stage IIIc or IVa ovarian cancer (OC) treated by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 483 patients with ovarian cancer were retrospectively collected, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2016, from the FRANCOGYN database, regrouping data from 11 centers specialized in ovarian cancer treatment. Median overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to define prognostic factors of overall survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 52 after a median follow up of 30 months. After univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with decreased overall survival were; no pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy (p = 0.002), residual disease (CC1/CC2/CC3) after surgery (p < 0.001), positive cytology after NAC (p < 0.001), omental disease after NAC (p = 0.002), no pathologic complete response (pCR) (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with decreased overall survival were; residual disease after surgery (HR = 1.93; CI95% (1.16-3.21), p = 0.01) and positive cytology after NAC (HR = 1.59; CI95% (1.01-2.55), p = 0.05). Patients with no residual disease after surgery had a median overall survival of 64 months versus 35 months for patients with residual disease. Patients with negative cytology after NAC had a median overall survival of 71 months versus 43 months for patients with positive cytology after NAC. CONCLUSION: In this first and largest French based retrospective study, complete cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer remains the main prognostic factor of overall survival.

Salvage lymphadenectomy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: Analysis of clinical outcome and BRCA1/2 gene mutational status.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to analyze the clinical outcome of recurrent ovarian cancer patients bearing isolated lymph-node recurrence (ILNR) who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy (SL). The prognostic role of clinicopathological variables and the mutational status of BRCA1/2 have also been investigated. METHODS: This retrospective, single-institutional study included women with platinum-sensitive lymph node recurrence underwent to SL between June 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of clinical parameters, and BRCA1/2 mutational status on post salvage lymphadenectomy progression-free survival (PSL-PFS). RESULTS: As of June 2019, the median follow-up after SL was 30 months, and the relapse has been documented in 48 (56.5%) patients. In the whole series, the median PSL-PFS was 21 months, and the 3-year PSL-PFS was 36.7%. The median PSL-PFS, according to patients with ILNR (N = 71) versus patients with lymph-nodes and other sites of disease (N = 14), was 27 months versus 12 months, respectively. Univariate analysis of variables conditioning PSL-PFS showed that platinum-free interval (PFI) ≥12 months, normal Ca125 serum levels, and number of metastatic lymph-nodes ≤3 played a statistically significant favorable role. In multivariate analysis, PFI duration ≥12 months and the number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤3 were shown to keep their favorable, independent prognostic value on PSL-PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of SL, the patients with long PFI and low metastatic lymph node numbers at ILNR diagnosis have the best outcome. The BRCA mutational status seems not associated with clinical variables and PSL-PFS, differently from other sites of disease in ROC patients.

DNA damage accumulates and responses are engaged in human ALS brain and spinal motor neurons and DNA repair is activatable in iPSC-derived motor neurons with SOD1 mutations.

DNA damage is implicated in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, relationships between DNA damage accumulation, DNA damage response (DDR), and upper and lower motor neuron vulnerability in human ALS are unclear; furthermore, it is unknown whether epigenetic silencing of DNA repair pathways contributes to ALS pathogenesis. We tested the hypotheses that DNA damage accumulates in ALS motor neurons along with diminished DDR, and that DNA repair genes undergo hypermethylation. Human postmortem CNS tissue was obtained from ALS cases (N = 34) and age-matched controls without neurologic disease (N = 15). Compared to age-matched controls, abasic sites accumulated in genomic DNA of ALS motor cortex and laser capture microdissection-acquired spinal motor neurons but not in motor neuron mitochondrial DNA. By immunohistochemistry, DNA damage accumulated significantly in upper and lower motor neurons in ALS cases as single-stranded DNA and 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (OHdG) compared to age-matched controls. Significant DDR was engaged in ALS motor neurons as evidenced by accumulation of c-Abl, nuclear BRCA1, and ATM activation. DNA damage and DDR were present in motor neurons at pre-attritional stages and throughout the somatodendritic attritional stages of neurodegeneration. Motor neurons with DNA damage were also positive for activated p53 and cleaved caspase-3. Gene-specific promoter DNA methylation pyrosequencing identified the DNA repair genes Ogg1, Apex1, Pnkp and Aptx as hypomethylated in ALS. In human induced-pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived motor neurons with familial ALS SOD1 mutations, DNA repair capacity was similar to isogenic control motor neurons. Our results show that vulnerable neurons in human ALS accumulate DNA damage, and contrary to our hypothesis, strongly activate and mobilize response effectors and DNA repair genes. This DDR in ALS motor neurons involves recruitment of c-Abl and BRCA1 to the nucleus in vivo, and repair of DNA double-strand breaks in human ALS motor neurons with SOD1 mutations in cell culture.

Rate of BRCA mutation in patients tested under NCCN genetic testing criteria.

BACKGROUND: BRCA genetic testing is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in breast cancer patients who meet specific criteria. Limited data are available on the likelihood of detecting a mutation when these guidelines are followed. METHODS: A retrospective chart review examined patients with breast cancer who underwent BRCA testing based on NCCN guidelines. RESULTS: Twelve (6.0%) of the 199 patients had a deleterious BRCA mutation. Family history of BRCA mutations (50%, p = 0.019), age ≤45 at diagnosis (9.7%, p = 0.034) and meeting ≥3 NCCN criteria (13.3%, p = 0.03) yielded the highest rates of BRCA mutation. Having a family history of BRCA mutation and age ≤45 were associated with increased rate of BRCA mutation on multivariate analysis (OR 14.3, CI 1.2-166.3; OR 11.6, CI 1.2-108.6). CONCLUSION: Select NCCN criteria are associated with higher rates of BRCA mutations. Waiting for genetic testing results to guide surgical management may be warranted in this subset of patients.

Prostate cancer genetic testing: NCCN familial high-risk assessment: breast/ovarian.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines have become the most recognized standard for clinical policy in cancer care. The Genetic Breast and Ovarian Guideline was introduced in 1999 with an emphasis on BRCA1/2. Based on evidence linking prostate cancer to the BRCA genes, prostate cancer was added to the guideline as a criterion for risk assessment in 2013. The current criteria include aggressive/metastatic disease and family history of BRCA-related cancers.

Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69%) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91% vs 41%, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99% vs 95%, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98% vs 82%, P<.01), and collect washings (94% vs 49%, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8%). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3% in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8% in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.