Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 47(2): 111-113, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688726

RESUMO

Targeted antibiotics could delay emergence of resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The DNA gyrase subunit A assay predicts susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. A model found that adding a $50 gyrase subunit A test for asymptomatic patients screened for N. gonorrhoeae resulted in cost neutrality. When ciprofloxacin susceptibility was high, a $114 test resulted in savings.


Assuntos
Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , DNA Girase/análise , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Gonorreia/economia , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecções Assintomáticas , Ciprofloxacina/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Custos e Análise de Custo , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estados Unidos
2.
Trials ; 17(1): 558, 2016 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27881151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea is a common sexually transmitted infection which causes genital pain and discomfort; in women it can also lead to pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility, and in men to epididymo-orchitis. Current treatment is with ceftriaxone, but there is increasing evidence of antimicrobial resistance which is reducing its effectiveness against gonorrhoea. A small, but increasing, number of patients have already been found to have highly resistant strains of gonorrhoea which has been associated with clinical failure. This trial aims to determine whether gentamicin is not clinically worse than ceftriaxone in the treatment of gonorrhoea. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a blinded, two-arm, multicentre, noninferiority randomised trial. Patients are eligible if they are aged 16-70 years with a diagnosis of genital, pharyngeal and/or rectal gonorrhoea. Exclusion criteria are: known concurrent sexually transmitted infection(s) (excluding chlamydia); bacterial vaginosis and/or Trichomonas vaginalis infection; contraindications or an allergy to gentamicin, ceftriaxone, azithromycin or lidocaine; pregnancy or breastfeeding; complicated gonorrhoeal infection; weight under 40 kg; use of ceftriaxone, gentamicin or azithromycin within the preceding 28 days. Randomisation is to receive a single intramuscular injection of either gentamicin or ceftriaxone, all participants receive 1 g oral azithromycin as standard treatment. The estimated sample size is 720 participants (noninferiority limit 5%). The primary outcome is clearance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae at all infected sites by a negative Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, 2 weeks post treatment. Secondary outcomes include clinical resolution of symptoms, frequency of adverse events, tolerability of therapy, relationship between clinical effectiveness and antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentration for N. gonorrhoeae, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The options for future treatment of gonorrhoea are limited. Results from this randomised trial will demonstrate whether gentamicin is not clinically worse than ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea. This will inform clinical practice and policy for the treatment of gonorrhoea when current therapy with cephalosporins is no longer effective, or is contraindicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number - ISRCTN51783227 , Registered on 18 September 2014. Current protocol version 2.0 17 June 2015.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Ceftriaxona/administração & dosagem , Gentamicinas/administração & dosagem , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/economia , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Ceftriaxona/efeitos adversos , Ceftriaxona/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inglaterra , Feminino , Gentamicinas/efeitos adversos , Gentamicinas/economia , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/economia , Gonorreia/microbiologia , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
BMJ Open ; 4(7): e005322, 2014 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25056977

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore patient pathways using a chlamydia/gonorrhoea point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and estimate and compare the costs of the proposed POC pathways with the current pathways using standard laboratory-based NAAT testing. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: Workshops were conducted with healthcare professionals at four sexual health clinics representing diverse models of care in the UK. They mapped out current pathways that used chlamydia/gonorrhoea tests, and constructed new pathways using a POC NAAT. Healthcare professionals' time was assessed in each pathway. OUTCOME MEASURE: The proposed POC pathways were then priced using a model built in Microsoft Excel, and compared to previously published costs for pathways using standard NAAT-based testing in an off-site laboratory. RESULTS: Pathways using a POC NAAT for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients and chlamydia/gonorrhoea-only tests were shorter and less expensive than most of the current pathways. Notably, we estimate that POC testing as part of a sexual health screen for symptomatic patients, or as stand-alone chlamydia/gonorrhoea testing, could reduce costs per patient by as much as £16 or £6, respectively. In both cases, healthcare professionals' time would be reduced by approximately 10 min per patient. CONCLUSIONS: POC testing for chlamydia/gonorrhoea in a clinical setting may reduce costs and clinician time, and may lead to more appropriate and quicker care for patients. Further study is warranted on how to best implement POC testing in clinics, and on the broader clinical and cost implications of this technology.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/economia , Procedimentos Clínicos/economia , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/economia , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/economia , Testes Imediatos/economia , Infecções do Sistema Genital/diagnóstico , Infecções do Sistema Genital/economia , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/economia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reino Unido
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 11(8): 1265-73, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16102317

RESUMO

The increasing prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has required replacing inexpensive oral ciprofloxacin treatment with more expensive injectable ceftriaxone. Further, monitoring antimicrobial resistance requires culture testing, but nonculture gonorrhea tests are rapidly replacing culture. Since the strategies were similar in effectiveness (> 99%), we evaluated, from the healthcare system perspective, cost-minimizing strategies for both diagnosis (culture followed by antimicrobial susceptibility tests versus nonculture-based tests) and treatment (ciprofloxacin versus ceftriaxone) of gonorrhea in women. Our results indicate that switching from ciprofloxacin to ceftriaxone is cost-minimizing (i.e., optimal) when the prevalence of gonorrhea is > 3% and prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance is > 5%. Similarly, culture-based testing and susceptibility surveillance are optimal when the prevalence of gonorrhea is < 13%; nonculture-based testing is optimal (cost-minimizing) when gonorrhea prevalence is > or = 13%.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Ceftriaxona/economia , Ceftriaxona/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/economia , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Gonorreia/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Método de Monte Carlo
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 35(Suppl 2): S191-9, 2002 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12353206

RESUMO

The highest rates of reported gonorrhea infections occur among adolescent females aged 15-19 years. Among the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended single-dose gonorrhea treatment regimens, ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is approximately half the cost of other CDC-recommended oral treatment regimens. Fluoroquinolone use in patients aged <18 years has been limited because of irreversible articular cartilage damage demonstrated in large, weight-bearing joints of young animals. We reviewed the medical literature to assess whether the risks of a single 500-mg dose of ciprofloxacin to treat uncomplicated gonorrhea infection in adolescents appears to outweigh the benefits. We found no reports of irreversible cartilage toxicity or age-associated adverse events in 5236 human children and adolescents (aged 5 days-24 years) treated with a total of 5486 courses of fluoroquinolones.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/efeitos adversos , Gonorreia/economia , Gonorreia/patologia , Humanos , Medição de Risco
7.
Sex Transm Infect ; 74 Suppl 1: S29-33, 1998 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10023350

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine feasibility, validity, and cost effectiveness of the syndromic approach to male patients with urethral discharge in Bandung, Indonesia. METHODS: The WHO algorithm on urethral discharge with no microscopy available was evaluated. Patients presented with a complaint of urethral discharge and if discharge was confirmed the algorithm was applied. Treatment covered gonococcal and chlamydial infection (ciprofloxacin 500 mg single oral dose plus doxycycline 100 mg, twice daily orally for 7 days). The gold standard for validation was gonococcal culture and chlamydia antigen detection. RESULTS: 140 male patients with a complaint of urethral discharge were enrolled; 119 had confirmed discharge and entered the decision tree: 107 were followed and 104 (97%) were clinically cured. Of the three patients with persistent discharge, one had a purulent urethral discharge, diagnosed as gonococcal urethritis and he was probably reinfected; two patients had a serous discharge and microbiological tests were negative. Overall, 106 out of 107 patients (99%) were microbiologically cured. Sensitivity of the algorithm is 100% and its positive predictive value (PPV) is 75% or 97% if validated against gold standard microbiological tests or Gram stain, respectively. Cost per patient is rupiah (Rp)5.894 ($US2.56) for the algorithm compared with Rp43.024 ($18.70) for full microbiological diagnosis. The cost estimate for an algorithm of urethral discharge with microscopy available is Rp6.432 ($2.80) CONCLUSION: The "symptom and sign" algorithm is fully adapted to the prevailing situation in primary healthcare settings, is acceptable to healthcare workers and patients (who are effectively treated at their first visit), is highly cost effective, is 100% sensitive (no false negatives, which is not the case with microbiological diagnosis), and has a high PPV, between 75% and 97%. It is an excellent patient management tool and a sound basis for partner notification so that it should have a major impact on STD/HIV control and prevention in both men and women.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Uretrais/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economia , Infecções por Chlamydia/complicações , Infecções por Chlamydia/economia , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Gonorreia/complicações , Gonorreia/economia , Humanos , Indonésia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Uretrais/economia , Doenças Uretrais/microbiologia
8.
Sex Transm Dis ; 17(4): 175-80, 1990.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2124730

RESUMO

Though ampicillin is no longer recommended as first-line therapy for infections caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the cost and efficacy of this policy in low prevalence areas has not been investigated. The problem was highlighted by an outbreak of penicillin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae in an area where the proportion of resistance had previously been only 0.14%. A decision analysis was performed to determine the cost-effectiveness of beta-lactamase screening and alternative therapies for patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Empiric therapy with an inexpensive agent active against resistant strains, such as ciprofloxacin, was the most cost-effective approach and remained more cost-effective than alternative strategies whenever the proportion of resistant isolates exceeded 3%. Ceftriaxone was less cost-effective. In low prevalence areas, and in areas where the return rate of recalled patients is high, ampicillin therapy was cost-effective, but beta-lactamase screening should be performed routinely.


Assuntos
Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efeitos dos fármacos , Resistência às Penicilinas , Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Ceftriaxona/administração & dosagem , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Surtos de Doenças , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Gonorreia/economia , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologia , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/enzimologia , Prevalência , Probenecid/administração & dosagem , Probenecid/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamases/biossíntese
9.
Sex Transm Dis ; 15(4): 234-43, 1988.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3147528

RESUMO

Antibiotics available to treat uncomplicated anogenital infections due to beta-lactamase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae include spectinomycin, ceftriaxone, and clavulanic acid added to aqueous procaine penicillin G or amoxicillin. Important variables in deciding which antibiotic regimen to use include effectiveness against urethral, cervical, pharyngeal, and rectal infections; cost; eradication of coexisting incubating syphilis; adverse effects; efficacy against strains of N. gonorrhoeae with chromosomally mediated resistance to antimicrobial agents; ease of administration; patient acceptance; and the potential for inducing resistance to antimicrobial agents in pathogens other than those causing sexually transmitted diseases. This review outlines the advantages and disadvantages of the various regimens.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Feminino , Gonorreia/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efeitos dos fármacos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA