Audio-Visual Stimulation Improves Visual Search Abilities in Hemianopia due to Childhood Acquired Brain Lesions.

Results obtained in both animal models and hemianopic patients indicate that sound, spatially and temporally coincident with a visual stimulus, can improve visual perception in the blind hemifield, probably due to activation of 'multisensory neurons', mainly located in the superior colliculus. In view of this evidence, a new rehabilitation approach, based on audiovisual stimulation of visual field, has been proposed, and applied in adults with visual field reduction due to unilateral brain lesions. So far, results have been very encouraging, with improvements in visual search abilities. Based on these findings, we have investigated the possibility of inducing long-lasting amelioration also in children with a visual deficit due to acquired brain lesions. Our results suggest that, in the absence of spontaneous recovery, audiovisual training can induce activation of visual responsiveness of the oculomotor system also in children and adolescents with acquired lesions and confirm the putatively important role of the superior colliculus (SC) in this process.

Evaluation of two treatment outcome prediction models for restoration of visual fields in patients with postchiasmatic visual pathway lesions.

Visual functions of patients with visual field defects after acquired brain injury affecting the primary visual pathway can be improved by means of vision restoration training. Since the extent of the restored visual field varies between patients, the prediction of treatment outcome and its visualization may help patients to decide for or against participating in therapies aimed at vision restoration. For this purpose, two treatment outcome prediction models were established based on either self-organizing maps (SOMs) or categorical regression (CR) to predict visual field change after intervention by several features that were hypothesized to be associated with vision restoration. Prediction was calculated for visual field changes recorded with High Resolution Perimetry (HRP). Both models revealed a similar predictive quality with the CR model being slightly more beneficial. Predictive quality of the SOM model improved when using only a small number of features that exhibited a higher association with treatment outcome than the remaining features, i.e. neighborhood activity and homogeneity within the surrounding 5° visual field of a given position, together with its residual function and distance to the scotoma border. Although both models serve their purpose, these were not able to outperform a primitive prediction rule that attests the importance of areas of residual vision, i.e. regions with partial visual field function, for vision restoration.

Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: We have previously reported that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered to the occipital cortex enhances visual functional recovery when combined with three months of computer-based rehabilitative training in patients with hemianopia. The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal sequence of effects of tDCS on visual recovery as they appear over the course of training and across different indicators of visual function. METHODS: Primary objective outcome measures were 1) shifts in visual field border and 2) stimulus detection accuracy within the affected hemifield. These were compared between patients randomized to either vision restoration therapy (VRT) combined with active tDCS or VRT paired with sham tDCS. Training comprised two half-hour sessions, three times a week for three months. Primary outcome measures were collected at baseline (pretest), monthly interim intervals, and at posttest (three months). As secondary outcome measures, contrast sensitivity and reading performance were collected at pretest and posttest time points only. RESULTS: Active tDCS combined with VRT accelerated the recovery of stimulus detection as between-group differences appeared within the first month of training. In contrast, a shift in the visual field border was only evident at posttest (after three months of training). tDCS did not affect contrast sensitivity or reading performance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that tDCS may differentially affect the magnitude and sequence of visual recovery in a manner that is task specific to the type of visual rehabilitative training strategy employed.

Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) aims to improve visual field function by systematically training regions of residual vision associated with the activity of suboptimal firing neurons within the occipital cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate cortical excitability. OBJECTIVE: Assess the possible efficacy of tDCS combined with VRT. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, demonstration-of-concept pilot study where participants were assigned to either VRT and tDCS or VRT and sham. The anode was placed over the occipital pole to target both affected and unaffected lobes. One hour training sessions were carried out 3 times per week for 3 months in a laboratory. Outcome measures included objective and subjective changes in visual field, recording of visual fixation performance, and vision-related activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Although 12 participants were enrolled, only 8 could be analyzed. The VRT and tDCS group demonstrated significantly greater expansion in visual field and improvement on ADLs compared with the VRT and sham group. Contrary to expectations, subjective perception of visual field change was greater in the VRT and sham group. QOL did not change for either group. The observed changes in visual field were unrelated to compensatory eye movements, as shown with fixation monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of occipital cortical tDCS with visual field rehabilitation appears to enhance visual functional outcomes compared with visual rehabilitation alone. TDCS may enhance inherent mechanisms of plasticity associated with training.

Combining visual rehabilitative training and noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance visual function in patients with hemianopia: a comparative case study.

OBJECTIVE: To standardize a protocol for promoting visual rehabilitative outcomes in post-stroke hemianopia by combining occipital cortical transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT). DESIGN: A comparative case study assessing feasibility and safety. SETTING: A controlled laboratory setting. PATIENTS: Two patients, both with right hemianopia after occipital stroke damage. METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Both patients underwent an identical VRT protocol that lasted 3 months (30 minutes, twice a day, 3 days per week). In patient 1, anodal tDCS was delivered to the occipital cortex during VRT training, whereas in patient 2 sham tDCS with VRT was performed. The primary outcome, visual field border, was defined objectively by using high-resolution perimetry. Secondary outcomes included subjective characterization of visual deficit and functional surveys that assessed performance on activities of daily living. For patient 1, the neural correlates of visual recovery were also investigated, by using functional magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Delivery of combined tDCS with VRT was feasible and safe. High-resolution perimetry revealed a greater shift in visual field border for patient 1 versus patient 2. Patient 1 also showed greater recovery of function in activities of daily living. Contrary to the expectation, patient 2 perceived greater subjective improvement in visual field despite objective high-resolution perimetry results that indicated otherwise. In patient 1, visual function recovery was associated with functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in surviving peri-lesional and bilateral higher-order visual areas. CONCLUSIONS: Results of preliminary case comparisons suggest that occipital cortical tDCS may enhance recovery of visual function associated with concurrent VRT through visual cortical reorganization. Future studies may benefit from incorporating protocol refinements such as those described here, which include global capture of function, control for potential confounds, and investigation of underlying neural substrates of recovery.

Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation.

One of the most effective techniques in the rehabilitation of visual field defects is based on implementation of oculomotor strategies to compensate for visual field loss. In the present study we develop a new rehabilitation approach based on the audio-visual stimulation of the visual field. Since it has been demonstrated that audio-visual interaction in multisensory neurons can improve temporally visual perception in patients with hemianopia, the aim of the present study was to verify whether a systematic audio-visual stimulation might induce a long-lasting amelioration of visual field disorders. Eight patients with chronic visual field defects were trained to detect the presence of visual targets. During the training, the visual stimulus could be presented alone, i.e. unimodal condition, or together with an acoustic stimulus, i.e. crossmodal conditions. In the crossmodal conditions, the spatial disparity between the visual and the acoustic stimuli were systematically varied (0, 16 and 32 degrees of disparity). Furthermore, the temporal interval between the acoustic stimulus and the visual target in the crossmodal conditions was gradually reduced from 500 to 0 ms. Patients underwent the treatment for 4 h daily, over a period of nearly 2 weeks. The results showed a progressive improvement of visual detections during the training and an improvement of visual oculomotor exploration that allowed patients to efficiently compensate for the loss of vision. More interesting, there was a transfer of treatment gains to functional measures assessing visual field exploration and to daily-life activities, which was found stable at the 1 month follow-up control session. These findings are very promising with respect to the possibility of taking advantage of human multisensory capabilities to recover from unimodal sensory impairments.

Rehabilitative management of post-stroke visuospatial inattention.

PURPOSE: Visuospatial inattention or sensory neglect is a common impairment following cerebrovascular accident and is thought to negatively impact on functional recovery and long-term outcome. This review examines various rehabilitative interventions available for the management of visuospatial inattention and the literature that supports their efficacy. METHOD: Medical literature review. RESULTS: Therapies geared toward improved visual scanning and 'retraining' of patients to attend to the neglected field are the mainstay of current therapy. While some studies support their efficacy, others have reported limited benefit. Newer approaches that may be efficacious include eye patching techniques, use of video feedback during therapy, training in visual imagery, and pharmacologic therapy with dopamine agonists. Protocols using vestibular, somatosensory and optokinetic stimulation have each been shown to produce transient improvements in neglect. However, therapeutic applications for these techniques have not been studied. CONCLUSIONS: A number of approaches toward the rehabilitation of post-stroke neglect are described in the literature. Further research is needed to better define which techniques may prove most beneficial.