Does Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Overvalue Potential Cures? Exploring Alternative Methods for Applying a "Shared Savings" Approach to Cost Offsets.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate alternative methods to calculate and/or attribute economic surplus in the cost-effectiveness analysis of single or short-term therapies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of articles describing alternative methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of potentially curative therapies whose assessment using traditional methods may suggest unaffordable valuations owing to the magnitude of estimated long-term quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains or cost offsets. Through internal deliberation and discussion with staff at the Health Technology Assessment bodies in England and Canada, we developed the following 3 alternative methods for further evaluation: (1) capping annual costs in the comparator arm at $150 000 per year; (2) "sharing" the economic surplus with the health sector by apportioning only 50% of cost offsets or 50% of cost offsets and QALY gains to the value of the therapy; and (3) crediting the therapy with only 12 years of the average annual cost offsets or cost offsets and QALY gains over the lifetime horizon. The impact of each alternative method was evaluated by applying it in an economic model of 3 hypothetical condition-treatment scenarios meant to reflect a diversity of chronicity and background healthcare costs. RESULTS: The alternative with greatest impact on threshold price for the fatal pediatric condition spinal muscular atrophy type 1 was the 12-year cutoff scenario. For a hypothetical one-time treatment for hemophilia A, capping cost offsets at $150 000 per year had the greatest impact. For chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, capping cost offsets or using 12-year threshold had little impact, whereas 50% sharing of surplus including QALY gains and cost offsets greatly reduced threshold pricing. CONCLUSIONS: Health Technology Assessment bodies and policy makers will wrestle with how to evaluate single or short-term potentially curative therapies and establish pricing and payment mechanisms to ensure sustainability. Scenario analyses using alternative methods for calculating and apportioning economic surplus can provide starkly different assessment results. These methods may stimulate important societal dialogue on fair pricing for these novel treatments.

The Jamaican Haemophilia Registry: Describing the burden of disease.

INTRODUCTION: Jamaica has an estimated 200 persons with haemophilia (PWH), who face significant constraints in access to specialized haemophilia care, including access to clotting factor concentrates. AIM: The aim of this paper is to establish the current burden of disease in PWH in Jamaica. METHODS: PWH were enrolled through the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica. The impact of haemophilia was assessed using a comprehensive battery of heath outcome measures that included the following: laboratory, clinical information and validated outcome measures of joint structure and function, activity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) to provide a health profile of the Jamaican haemophilia population. RESULTS: In all, 45 PWH were registered (mean age: 29, range: 0.17-69 years), including 13 children (<18 years of age) and 32 adults. In this sample, 41 had haemophilia A (30 severe) and 4 had haemophilia B (3 severe); 10 patients with haemophilia A were inhibitor positive. The results indicate that adults with haemophilia in Jamaica have significant joint damage: mean Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) = 42.1 (SD = 17.3); moderate activity levels - mean Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) score = 64.8 (SD = 17.8); and low HRQoL scores - mean Haemo-QoL-A score = 62.3 (SD = 19.4). Results for children are also reported but should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: There is a very high burden of disease in PWH in Jamaica. The health profiles reported in this paper are an essential first step in advocating for a multidisciplinary Comprehensive Care Program for assessment and care of PWH in Jamaica.

Cost-Benefit Analysis and Assessment of Quality of Care in patients with Hemophilia undergoing treatment at National Rural Health Mission in Maharashtra, India.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia is a genetic disorder with high health care burden. In India, most patients with hemophilia seek care through self-purchasing factor concentrate and incur huge out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure. In March 2013, the government of India launched a pilot hematology program through the National Rural Health Mission for providing free treatment services to patients with hemophilia in the state of Maharashtra. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the benefit-cost ratio of the program from a patient perspective, to estimate reduction in OOP expenditure of the patients and their families, and to assess the quality of care delivered and the barriers to access care among patients with hemophilia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the intervention of free treatment to patients with hemophilia at four district civil hospitals of Maharashtra. The study sample included 232 people with hemophilia (193 with hemophilia A, 31 with hemophilia B, 6 with von Willebrand disease, and 2 others) under four study arms over a 1-year study period. Cost-benefit analysis was performed for patients undergoing treatment at government hospitals and through nongovernmental organizations. RESULTS: The benefit-cost ratio for the government program was 1.89. There was reduction in OOP expenditure by 21% per patient annually for the families. About 98% patients were highly satisfied with the services, whereas a major barrier to access was difficulty in commuting during active bleeding episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The government intervention through the National Rural Health Mission was cost-beneficial to the patients with hemophilia. It helped in reducing the OOP expenditure by 21%.

An innovative outcome-based care and procurement model of hemophilia management.

Hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder associated with spontaneous and post-traumatic bleeding. Each hemophilia patient requires a personalized approach to episodic or prophylactic treatment, but self-management can be challenging for patients, and avoidable bleeding may occur. Patient-tailored care may provide more effective prevention of bleeding, which in turn, may decrease the likelihood of arthropathy and associated chronic pain, missed time from school or work, and progressive loss of mobility. A strategy is presented here aiming to reduce or eliminate bleeding altogether through a holistic approach based on individual patient characteristics. In an environment of budget constraints, this approach would link procurement to patient outcome, adding incentives for all stakeholders to strive for optimal care and, ultimately, a bleed-free world.

Treatment outcomes, quality of life, and impact of hemophilia on young adults (aged 18-30 years) with hemophilia.

The Hemophilia Experiences, Results and Opportunities (HERO) initiative assessed psychosocial issues reported by people with moderate to severe hemophilia and was led by a multidisciplinary international advisory board. This analysis reports data from young adult respondents (aged 18-30 years), including both US and overall global (including US respondents) results, and investigates treatment outcomes, quality of life, and impacts of hemophilia on relationships. More young adults in HERO received prophylaxis than on-demand treatment, although a majority reported not using factor products exactly as prescribed, and 50% of global respondents and 26% of US respondents reported issues with access to factor replacement therapy in the previous 5 years. Many young adults with hemophilia reported comorbidities, including bone/skeletal arthritis, chronic pain, and viral infections, and nearly half of young adults reported anxiety/depression. Most reported pain interference with daily activities in the past 4 weeks, although a majority reported participating in lower-risk activities and approximately half in intermediate-risk activities. Most young adults were very or quite satisfied with the support of partners/spouses, family, and friends, although roughly one-third reported that hemophilia affected their ability to develop close relationships with a partner. A majority of young adults reported that hemophilia has had a negative impact on employment, and 62% of global respondents and 78% of US respondents were employed at least part-time. Together these data highlight the psychosocial issues experienced by young adults with hemophilia and suggest that increased focus on these issues may improve comprehensive care during the transition to adulthood.

Costs and utilization of treatment in patients with hemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Although hemophilia has a potentially high economic impact, there are no published estimates of healthcare costs for this disease in Portugal. The aim of this study was to evaluate costs of treatment and hospital utilization among patients with hemophilia A and B, with and without inhibitors, over a 3-year period in a Portuguese Comprehensive Care Hemophilia Centre. This is the first study on the financial impact of healthcare costs in patients with hemophilia in Portugal. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study identified patients diagnosed with hemophilia A and B using medical and pharmacy electronic medical records and data from Centro Hospitalar São João, between January 2011 and December 2013. Patients with inhibitors were all high responders (>5 Bethesda Units [BU]). Severity was classified as mild, moderate or severe based on clotting factor levels. Two main outcomes were measured: (1) cost associated with hospital pharmacy claims (clotting factor) and (2) number of hospital visits/hospitalization. RESULTS: A cohort of 103 patients were identified: 72 (69.9 %) with hemophilia A and 31 (30.1 %) with hemophilia B. Among these, five individuals were classified as patients with inhibitors (four with hemophilia A and one with hemophilia B). From the cohort of hemophilia A patients, 36 individuals (35.0 %) were identified as having severe disease; 20 (19.4 %) moderate; and 16 (15.5 %) mild. In the cohort of hemophilia B patients, 14 (13.6 %) were identified as having severe disease; 14 (13.6 %) moderate; and three (2.9 %) mild. The total mean aggregate cost per year (including clotting factor and hospital utilization) for patients with severe hemophilia B was €112,469, compared with €793 for mild hemophilia A. Clotting factor concentrate amounted for 90 % of total cost in severe cases and hospital utilization was also higher in these cases. CONCLUSIONS: Hemophilia treatment is expensive, particularly for patients with severe disease and especially if they develop inhibitors to replacement clotting factors. In our study, severe hemophilia is associated with greater annual total costs in both types of hemophilia (A = €77,587 and B = € 112,469). Patients with inhibitors have costs 3.3 times higher than patients without inhibitors. Age was not associated with significantly greater total costs (clotting factor and hospital visits/hospitalizations).

Current management of the hemophilic child: a demanding interlocutor. Quality of life and adequate cost-efficacy analysis.

Hemophilias are the most known inherited bleeding disorders. The challenges in the management of hemophilic children are different from those in adults: prophylaxis regimen removed the hallmark of crippling disease with lifelong disabilities; individualized regimens are being implemented in order to overcome venous access problems. Presently, at least in high-income countries, advances in treatment of hemophilia resulted in continuous improvement of the patients' quality of life and life expectancy. Inhibitors remain the most severe complication of hemophilia therapy. The treatment' compliance is the key to achieve a successful management. The patient, his family, the medical and psychological team are the players of a comprehensive care system. The current management of hemophilic children is the example of huge resource investments enabling long-term benefits in particular quality of life as a primary objective of the healthcare process.

[Haemophilia in the German risk adjustment scheme]. / Die Hämophilie im morbiditätsorientierten Risikostrukturausgleich.

Haemophilia presents a challenge to every risk adjustment scheme even if it uses diagnostical or pharmaceutical data. The German adjustment scheme developed by the Bundesversicherungsamt realizes fairly cost homogenous groups for many expensive diseases. It does not regard haemophilia. This holds true for the original classification system (grouper) from 2009 and for the improved classification procedure in 2010. The extreme peak costs that can originate from haemophilia cases can present a existential risk for small health plans. The chances to form cost-homogeneous subgroups of the haemophilia disease by more specific coding or other measures seem low because of the small number of cases affected by this disease. The complementary (re-)installation of a expenditure-oriented risk sharing is regarded as suited for improvement of the performance of the German risk adjustment scheme. This also corresponds to international experience and practice.

Optimal haemophilia care versus the reality.

Haemophilia A and B are inherited bleeding disorders whose diagnosis and management is generally well established and best provided by specialists in a comprehensive care setting. Patients may be put at unnecessary risk if appropriate expertise is not sought for the management of accidents and surgery. The delivery of a high quality comprehensive service to patients with bleeding disorders depends upon defined standards and a network of haemophilia centres in the UK with similar models in other countries. In developing countries, despite a shortage or absence of treatment products, development of local expertise results in an improved outlook and reduction in mortality. Optimal care for severe haemophilia includes accurate diagnosis, early and adequate factor replacement for bleeding episodes and the provision of prophylaxis from an early age to prevent joint bleeding and the consequent arthropathy. Haemophilia treatment is expensive resulting in considerable inequity in provision of care across the world. Despite decades of experience, optimal treatment levels are not robustly defined. Transfusion-transmitted infections continue to have a significant impact on patient management. The development of inhibitory antibodies seriously complicates the management both in morbidity and cost. While gene therapy has not yet produced the hoped-for cure, new technologies will produce improved products.

Haemophilia Utilization Group Study: assessment of functional health status in haemophilia.

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between health care and utilization of that health care, and to provide a base measurement of health status in patients with haemophilia. Provider interview and retrospective chart review of 336 patients with haemophilia treated during 1995 at one of five comprehensive haemophilia treatment centres was conducted to measure patient health status characteristics and utilization of health care. Two health status scales were included. The first, the Self-Care Measure, was a four-point single item scale measuring the patient's ability for basic self-care, which was scored by a chart review and an interview with the health-care provider. The second, the Haemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS) Functional Status Measure, is a four-item, 10-point scale developed specifically for patients with haemophilia. Our sample represents 27% of actively treated patients in region IX. The mean score on the HUGS Functional Status Measure was 8.7 (SD=2.4). The HUGS scale exhibited a ceiling effect across all four scales: attitude (n=269, 80.1%), overall wellbeing (n=263, 78.3%), working (n=254, 75.6%) and orthopaedic status (n=195, 58.0%). Both higher total health-care costs and factor VIII annual costs were significantly associated with lower scores on the HUGS Functional Status Measure. Health status is a critical component in the assessment of the utilization and outcomes of care. In the absence of the availability of a patient interview, the HUGS Functional Status Measure can be used as one characteristic that explains the variation in the utilization of health care by patients with haemophilia.

Financial aspects of haemophilia care in Puerto Rico and other Latin American countries.

The present cost of optimal care in haemophilia is very high. The paradigm of comprehensive care approach, including the essential elements of continuous integrated multidisciplinary health services and the provision of home care with early use of antihaemophilic products requires abundant economic resources that usually are not readily available in nonaffluent countries. A cost-effective comprehensive paediatric haemophilia programme has been operating in Puerto Rico during the last 15 years that provides quality care to over 90% of paediatric haemophiliacs, and is financed mainly by the local government health system. Efforts are also being made to provide and/or coordinate health care to all adult haemophilic patients through the Puerto Rico Pediatric Hemophilia Treatment Center. Information on the haemophilia care available in Latin American countries is scanty. The data available indicate that with a few exceptions, haemophilia care in this vast region is suboptimal. Apparently, early diagnosis is not common, there is lack of accessibility of services in most countries, comprehensive care is not the rule, safe high-purity AHF concentrates are used infrequently, and home care is used rarely. The main antihaemophilic products used are fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate due to the high cost of modern antihaemophilic factor concentrates. The average per capita income of the main Latin American countries is about one-quarter of that of the USA and Canada. The existing economic situation of most Latin American countries would make it very difficult for them to purchase modern antihaemophilic products regularly and provide quality comprehensive care to their haemophilia patients, unless they make special efforts and get some type of external help. As a result of this study recommendations are made to improve the quality and accessibility of services to haemophilia patients in Latin America and other nonaffluent countries.

Socioeconomic evaluation of a state-funded comprehensive hemophilia-care program.

To assess the effectiveness, cost, and socioeconomic gains associated with a comprehensive state-funded hemophilia program, we compared data from a three-year experience with such a program in Rhode Island with those from the preceding year. Self-treatment, integration of children into school, and achieving satisfying employment of adults are the main goals of the program. During the most recent year, 77 per cent of the patients with severe hemophilia in the state received total care through the Hemophilia Center. Twenty-eight of the 43 patients now treat themselves, the annual number of hospital days per patient has decreased from 12.6 to 3.5, and the number of visits to hospital facilities has fallen from 34 to 2.4, while the yearly cost of clotting factor per patient has remained about $7,000. Altogether, this has saved more than $10,000 each year for treatment, despite the cost of rehabilitative surgery. Numbers of days lost from school and work have decreased twofold and threefold, respectively. Best of all, comprehensive care has vastly improved the quality of life for patients with hemophilia in Rhode Island.