The use of complementary and alternative medicine by pediatric food-allergic patients in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In developed countries, increasing food allergy prevalence and concern regarding food allergies have been reported. Although the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for the treatment of allergic diseases has increased in some Western countries, the actual proportion and patterns of CAM use for pediatric food allergies in Japan are still unknown. METHODS: Fourteen allergy centers in Japan participated in the study using a questionnaire survey regarding the use of CAM by pediatric patients. A diagnosis of food allergy was made at each hospital by pediatric allergists. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by parents/guardians, and data were collected for a total of 962 pediatric food-allergic patients. Overall, 8.4% of the participants used CAM to treat a food allergy. The major CAM therapies used were herbal teas (22.2%), including several Japanese herbal teas, Chinese herbal medicine (18.5%) and lactic acid bacteria (16%). Among the participants using CAM to treat food allergy, 13.6% thought that the CAM being used was very effective, while 11.1% of participants thought that CAM caused some type of side effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first large-scale national survey regarding the use of CAM in pediatric patients with food allergies in Japan. Unlike in the USA, which has a higher rate of CAM use (17%), approximately 8.4% of food-allergic patients used CAM in Japan. Interestingly, the major types of CAM used in Japan differed from those used in the USA. Cultural differences and food customs may affect the use of CAM.

Plant food allergy in patients with pollinosis from the Mediterranean area.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pollinosis develop symptoms after intake of plant food more often than the general population. In order to study the prevalence of the presentation of allergic symptoms to plant foods in pollinosis, we selected a representative sample of the population from our Mediterranean area. METHODS: All patients completed a questionnaire, provided a blood sample and underwent a battery of skin and other complementary tests (prick-prick, oral challenge test) when necessary. The pollen counts were obtained from the Elche pollen station. In addition, sera from a subgroup of patients were checked with an allergen molecule panel on an Advia Centaur XP platform. RESULTS: Of the final sample (n = 233), 39.9% of the patients with pollinosis were sensitized and 30.9% had clinical allergy to at least one of the plant foods studied. Regression analysis showed that age and sensitization to the extracts of Platanus acerifolia and Artemisia vulgaris were the most important variables for discriminating between groups. Patients with pollinosis at a risk of allergy to plant foods had significantly higher Pru p 3 values [odds ratio (OR) 3.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.3-4.8], and the value increased according to the number of plant food sensitizations. CONCLUSION: Plant food allergy is more common in patients with pollinosis than in the general population. The use of the London plain tree (P. acerifolia) and mugwort (A. vulgaris) in the skin tests may help identify such patients in our Mediterranean area, but determination of rPru p 3 could also be very useful in patients suspected of having plant food allergy.

Impact of ingredient labeling practices on food allergic consumers.

BACKGROUND: Food allergic consumers depend on ingredient labels for allergen avoidance, and the modality of labeling is changing. OBJECTIVE: To investigate current responses to food labels so that the impact of future label changes can be anticipated. METHODS: Adults who attended Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network conferences completed a survey regarding their experiences with food labels for their family's most severely affected food allergic individual (FAI). RESULTS: There were 489 completed surveys (84% participation). Most FAIs were young (41% <4 years of age and 56% 4-18 years of age) and highly atopic (51% had asthma and 69% had atopic dermatitis). Food allergies included the following: peanut, 81%; tree nuts, 53%; milk, 51%; egg, 51%; and soy, 17%. All chocolate products were avoided by 37% of FAIs who were avoiding peanut and 40% who were avoiding tree nuts; 91% of tree nut allergic FAIs avoided all tree nuts. Of FAIs who avoided soy, 41% avoided soybean oil and 38% avoided soy lecithin. Of those who avoided milk, 82% avoided lactose. Allergic reactions were attributed to misunderstanding label terms (16%) and to nonspecific terms (spice, flavor) (22%). Ingredient labels were "always" or "frequently" read before purchase by 99%. Product brand choice was "very much influenced" by the manner of labeling for 86%, and manufacturers were contacted for more information by 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that improved product allergen labeling will reduce allergic reactions and simplify allergy management. However, the new labeling may not indicate the form or source of the allergen, and individuals who do not currently avoid foods with minimal or irrelevant protein content, such as soy oil or soy lecithin, may face additional ambiguity and unnecessary dietary restrictions.