Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Commun Biol ; 4(1): 53, 2021 01 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33420329

RESUMO

The G protein-coupled receptor 109 A (GPR109A) is robustly expressed in osteoclastic precursor macrophages. Previous studies suggested that GPR109A mediates effects of diet-derived phenolic acids such as hippuric acid (HA) and 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid (3-3-PPA) on promoting bone formation. However, the role of GPR109A in metabolic bone homeostasis and osteoclast differentiation has not been investigated. Using densitometric, bone histologic and molecular signaling analytic methods, we uncovered that bone mass and strength were significantly higher in tibia and spine of standard rodent diet weaned 4-week-old and 6-month-old GPR109A gene deletion (GPR109A-/-) mice, compared to their wild type controls. Osteoclast numbers in bone and in ex vivo bone marrow cell cultures were significantly decreased in GPR109A-/- mice compared to wild type controls. In accordance with these data, CTX-1 in bone marrow plasma and gene expression of bone resorption markers (TNFα, TRAP, Cathepsin K) were significantly decreased in GPR109A-/- mice, while on the other hand, P1NP was increased in serum from both male and female GPR109A-/- mice compared to their respective controls. GPR109A deletion led to suppressed Wnt/ß-catenin signaling in osteoclast precursors to inhibit osteoclast differentiation and activity. Indeed, HA and 3-3-PPA substantially inhibited RANKL-induced GPR109A expression and Wnt/ß-catenin signaling in osteoclast precursors and osteoclast differentiation. Resultantly, HA significantly inhibited bone resorption and increased bone mass in wild type mice, but had no additional effects on bone in GPR109A-/- mice compared with their respective untreated control mice. These results suggest an important role for GPR109A during osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption mediating effects of HA and 3-3-PPA on inhibiting bone resorption during skeletal development.


Assuntos
Reabsorção Óssea/prevenção & controle , Hipuratos/farmacologia , Osteogênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenilpropionatos/farmacologia , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Animais , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Feminino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Hipuratos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Knockout , Fenilpropionatos/uso terapêutico , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Via de Sinalização Wnt
3.
J Bone Miner Res ; 29(5): 1043-53, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23832484

RESUMO

A blueberry (BB)-supplemented diet has been previously shown to significantly stimulate bone formation in rapidly growing male and female rodents. Phenolic acids (PAs) are metabolites derived from polyphenols found in fruits and vegetables as a result of the actions of gut bacteria, and they were found in the serum of rats fed BB-containing diet. We conducted in vitro studies with PAs and demonstrated stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and proliferation. On the other hand, adipogenesis was inhibited. To more fully understand the mechanistic actions of PAs on bone formation, we administered hippuric acid, one of the major metabolites found in animal circulation after BB consumption, to prepubertal female mice for 2 weeks. We found that hippuric acid was able to stimulate bone-forming gene expression but suppress PPARγ expression, leading to increased bone mass dose-dependently. Cellular signaling studies further suggested that the skeletal effects of PAs appeared to be mediated through activation of G-protein-coupled receptor 109A and downstream p38 MAP kinase and osterix. In conclusion, PAs are capable of altering the mesenchymal stem cell differentiation program and merit investigation as potential dietary therapeutic alternatives to drugs for degenerative bone disorders. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


Assuntos
Adipócitos/metabolismo , Diferenciação Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Suplementos Nutricionais , Hipuratos/farmacologia , Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Adipócitos/citologia , Animais , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Diferenciação Celular/fisiologia , Feminino , Camundongos , Osteoblastos/citologia , Ratos
4.
Am J Med Sci ; 322(4): 204-8, 2001 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11678517

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Digitoxin and valproic acid show strong binding to serum albumin. Thus, when present simultaneously in serum, digitoxin and valproic acid compete for binding sites. We studied digitoxin-valproic acid interaction in normal and uremic sera. METHODS: Fluorescence polarization immunoassays were used for measuring total digitoxin and total valproic acid concentrations. We used a modified protocol of improved sensitivity to measure free digitoxin concentrations. We supplemented 2 normal and 2 uremic pools with digitoxin and then aliquots of these pools were further supplemented with various concentrations of valproic acid. After incubation at 37 degrees C for 2 hours in a water bath, specimens were allowed to re-equilibrate at room temperature for 20 minutes. Free digitoxin concentrations were measured. We also investigated digoxin-valproic acid interaction using 1 normal and 1 uremic serum pool. RESULTS: We observed significant increases in free digitoxin concentrations in normal sera in the presence of valproic acid. In contrast, we observed a slight decline in free digitoxin concentration in the presence of valproic acid in uremic sera. We speculated that uremic sera contained inhibitors that block digitoxin-valproic acid interaction and identified indoxyl sulfate as an inhibitor. However, another uremic compound, hippuric acid showed no inhibitory effect. Interestingly, we observed no significant interaction between digoxin and valproic acid in either normal or uremic serum pool. This is probably because of poor protein binding of digoxin. CONCLUSION: We conclude that valproic acid significantly displaces digitoxin from protein binding sites in normal serum. However, uremic sera contain inhibitors that block digitoxin-valproic acid interaction.


Assuntos
Digitoxina/antagonistas & inibidores , Digitoxina/sangue , Uremia/sangue , Ácido Valproico/antagonistas & inibidores , Ácido Valproico/sangue , Anticonvulsivantes/antagonistas & inibidores , Anticonvulsivantes/sangue , Sítios de Ligação , Ligação Competitiva , Cardiotônicos/antagonistas & inibidores , Cardiotônicos/sangue , Interações Medicamentosas , Hipuratos/sangue , Hipuratos/farmacologia , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Indicã/sangue , Indicã/farmacologia , Ligação Proteica , Albumina Sérica/metabolismo , Uremia/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA