Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 38(2): 425-432, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31025083

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of MDR bacteria in patients with urinary stones and the risk factors for its formation. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed among patients with urinary stones in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital from December 2014 to May 2018. Patients with positive urinary cultures and drug sensitivity results were included. MDR were defined as any bacteria that have resistance to at least one agent in at least three classes of antibiotics. Bacteria distribution and resistance patterns were calculated. RESULTS: 1655 patients with urinary stones were eligible for analysis, among which 367 patients had positive urinary culture, yielding 457 isolates of 45 species. Escherichia coli remained the most common organism with a prevalence of 29.3%, followed by Enterococcus faecalis (12.0%), Proteus mirabilis (10.5%), and Klebsiella pneumonia (6.8%). 44.4% isolates were identified as MDR. The three most common Gram-negative bacteria were Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, with a MDR rate of 84.33%, 62.5%, and 48.39%, respectively. Drug-resistant rates were different between MDR and non-MDR in ampicillin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefepime, gentamicin, amikacin, and levofloxacin (all with p value < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, indwelling catheters (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.07-8.98) and antibiotics use in the last 3 months (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04-4.38) were significantly associated with MDR formation. CONCLUSIONS: MDR bacteria were common among patients with urinary stones in our center and achieved high drug-resistant rates in ampicillin, first-generation and part of third-generation cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones. Indwelling catheters and antibiotics used in the last 3 months were independent risk factors for MDR formation. Tailored antibacterial strategies still should be established according to the local bacterial spectrum and patient condition.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cálculos Urinários/complicações , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Urinárias/complicações , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 42(9): 705-710, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31368905

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Higher facility surgical volume predicts for improved outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who undergo radical cystectomy. We investigated the association between facility radiotherapy (RT) case volume and overall survival (OS) for patients with MIBC who received bladder-preserving RT, and the relationship with adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for bladder preservation. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic MIBC from 2004 to 2015 and received RT at the reporting center. Facility case volume was defined as the total MIBC patients treated with RT during the period. Facilities were stratified into high-volume facility (HVF) or low-volume facility at the 80th percentile of RT case volume. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Rates of compliance with NCCN guidelines regarding the use of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor before RT, planned use of concurrent chemotherapy, and total RT dose were compared. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate predictors of OS. RESULTS: There were 7562 patients included. No differences in age, Charlson-Deyo score, T stage, or node-positive rates were observed between groups. HVFs exhibited greater compliance with NCCN guidelines for bladder preservation (P<0.0001). Treatment at an HVF was associated with the improved OS for all patients (P=0.001) and for the subset of patients receiving NCCN-recommended RT doses (P=0.0081). Volume was an independent predictor of OS (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at an HVF is associated with improved OS and greater guideline-concordant management among patients with MIBC.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/mortalidade , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Musculares/mortalidade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/mortalidade , Radioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Musculares/patologia , Neoplasias Musculares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Musculares/cirurgia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
3.
HPB (Oxford) ; 21(8): 981-989, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A retrospective study was performed to characterize trends in centralization of care and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for resected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and their impact on overall survival (OS). METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2004-2015 we identified patients undergoing resection for CCA. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses identified time periods and hospital volume groups for comparison. Propensity score matching provided case-mix adjusted patient cohorts. Cox hazard analysis identified risk factors for OS. RESULTS: Among the 40,338 patients undergoing resection for CCA, the proportion of patients undergoing surgery at high volume hospitals increased over time (25%-44%, p < 0.001), while the proportion of patients undergoing surgery at low volume hospitals decreased (30%-15%, p < 0.001). Using ROC analyses, a hospital volume of 14 operations/year was the most sensitive and specific value associated with mortality. Surgery at high volume hospitals [HR] = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.97, p < 0.001) and receipt of care compliant with NCCN guidelines (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.91, p < 0.001) were independently associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Both centralization of surgery for CCA to high volume hospitals and increased compliance with NCCN guidelines were associated with significant improvements in overall survival.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Serviços Centralizados no Hospital/normas , Colangiocarcinoma/cirurgia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Serviços Centralizados no Hospital/tendências , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidade , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(2): 295-304, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28079775

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial-ethnic disparities in guideline-based care in locally advanced cervical cancer and their relationship to hospital case volume. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 with locally advanced squamous or adenocarcinoma of the cervix undergoing definitive primary radiation therapy. The primary outcome was the race-ethnicity-based rates of adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-based care. The secondary outcome was the effect of guideline-based care on overall survival. Multivariable models and propensity matching were used to compare the hospital risk-adjusted rates of guideline-based adherence and overall survival based on hospital case volume. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 16,195 patients. The rate of guideline-based care was 58.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.4-59.4%) for non-Hispanic white, 53% (95% CI 51.4-54.9%) for non-Hispanic black, and 51.5% (95% CI 49.4-53.7%) for Hispanic women (P<.001). From 2004 to 2012, the rate of guideline-based care increased from 49.5% (95% CI 47.1-51.9%) to 59.1% (95% CI 56.9-61.2%) (Ptrend<.001). Based on a propensity score-matched analysis, patients receiving guideline-based care had a lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68). Compared with low-volume hospitals, the increase in adherence to guideline-based care in high-volume hospitals was 48-63% for non-Hispanic white, 47-53% for non-Hispanic black, and 41-54% for Hispanic women. CONCLUSION: Racial and ethnic disparities in the delivery of guideline-based care are the highest in high-volume hospitals. Guideline-based care in locally advanced cervical cancer is associated with improved survival.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/etnologia , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etnologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Radioterapia/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/etnologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(4): 1117-1120, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27919580

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model is designed to minimize costs and improve quality for Medicare patients undergoing joint arthroplasty. The cost of hip arthroplasty (HA) episode varies depending on the preoperative diagnosis and is greater for fracture than for osteoarthritis. Hospitals that perform a higher percentage of HA for OA may therefore have an advantage in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model. The purposes of this study are to (1) determine the variability in underlying diagnosis for HA in New York State hospitals, and (2) determine hospital characteristics, such as volume, associated with this. METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was used to identify 127,206 primary HA procedures from 2010 to 2014. The data included underlying diagnoses, age, length of stay, and total charges. Hospitals were categorized by volume and descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: OA was the underlying diagnosis for HA for 74.2% of all patients; this was significantly higher for high-volume (89.30%) and medium-volume (74.9%) hospitals than for low-volume hospitals (58.4%, P < .05). HA for fracture was significantly more common at low-volume hospitals (32.4%) compared to medium-volume (18.0%) and high-volume (4.7%) hospitals (P < .05). Length of stay was significantly greater at low-volume hospitals for all diagnoses. CONCLUSION: High-volume hospitals perform a higher ratio of HA cases for OA compared to fracture, which may lead to advantages in patient outcomes and cost. The variation in underlying diagnosis between hospitals has financial implications and underscores the need for HAs to be risk stratified by preoperative diagnosis.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Especializados/estatística & dados numéricos , Artropatias/diagnóstico , Artropatias/epidemiologia , Ortopedia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Articulação do Quadril/cirurgia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Artropatias/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , New York/epidemiologia
6.
Gynecol Oncol ; 139(3): 495-9, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26387962

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop an observed-to-expected ratio (O/E) for adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) ovarian cancer treatment guidelines as a risk-adjusted hospital measure of quality care correlated with disease-specific survival. METHODS: Consecutive patients with stages I-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were identified from the California Cancer Registry (1/1/96-12/31/06). Using a fit logistic regression model, O/E for guideline adherence was calculated for each hospital and distributed into quartiles stratified by hospital annual case volume: lowest O/E quartile or annual hospital case volume <5, middle two O/E quartiles and volume ≥5, and highest O/E quartile and volume ≥5. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to characterize the independent effect of hospital O/E on ovarian cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Overall, 18,491 patients were treated at 405 hospitals; 37.3% received guideline adherent care. Lowest O/E hospitals (n=285) treated 4661 patients (25.2%), mean O/E=0.77±0.55 and median survival 38.9months (95%CI=36.2-42.0months). Intermediate O/E hospitals (n=85) treated 8715 patients (47.1%), mean O/E=0.87±0.17 and median survival of 50.5months (95% CI=48.4-52.8months). Highest O/E hospitals (n=35) treated 5115 patients (27.7%), mean O/E=1.34±0.14 and median survival of 53.8months (95% CI=50.2-58.2months). After controlling for other variables, treatment at highest O/E hospitals was associated with independent and statistically significant improvement in ovarian cancer-specific survival compared to intermediate O/E (HR=1.06, 95% CI=1.01-1.11) and lowest O/E (1.16, 95% CI=1.10-1.23) hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Calculation of hospital-specific O/E for NCCN treatment guideline adherence, combined with minimum case volume criterion, as a measure of ovarian cancer quality of care is feasible and is an independent predictor of survival.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
7.
J Am Coll Surg ; 220(5): 940-50, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25840536

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The regional impact of care at a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI-CCC) on adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) ovarian cancer treatment guidelines and survival is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective population-based study of consecutive patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2006 in southern California. Patients were stratified according to care at an NCI-CCC (n = 5), non-NCI high-volume hospital (≥ 10 cases/year, HVH, n = 29), or low-volume hospital (<10 cases/year, LVH, n = 158). Multivariable logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to examine the effect of NCI-CCC status on treatment guideline adherence and ovarian cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 9,933 patients were identified (stage I, 22.8%; stage II, 7.9%; stage III, 45.1%; stage IV, 24.2%), and 8.1% of patients were treated at NCI-CCCs. Overall, 35.7% of patients received NCCN guideline adherent care, and NCI-CCC status (odds ratio [OR] 1.00) was an independent predictor of adherence to treatment guidelines compared with HVHs (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99) and LVHs (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.67). The median ovarian cancer-specific survivals according to hospital type were: NCI-CCC 77.9 (95% CI 61.4 to 92.9) months, HVH 51.9 (95% CI 49.2 to 55.7) months, and LVH 43.4 (95% CI 39.9 to 47.2) months (p < 0.0001). National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center status (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00) was a statistically significant and independent predictor of improved survival compared with HVH (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33) and LVH (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center status is an independent predictor of adherence to ovarian cancer treatment guidelines and improved ovarian cancer-specific survival. These data validate NCI-CCC status as a structural health care characteristic correlated with superior ovarian cancer quality measure performance. Increased access to NCI-CCCs through regional concentration of care may be a mechanism to improve clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/normas , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/terapia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , California , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Ovariectomia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 24(5): 760-5, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25672258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) may be associated with substantial blood loss, and some patients require perioperative blood transfusion. Possible blood transfusion methods include predonated autologous blood transfusion, perioperative autologous blood transfusion, and allogeneic blood transfusion (ALBT). The purposes of the present study were to assess the incidence and recent trends over time of blood transfusion in TSA and analyze patient and hospital characteristics that affect the risk of ALBT. METHODS: This study used national hospital discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2000 and 2009. The data were used to generate the overall blood transfusion rate, and linear regression was used to assess trends in transfusion patterns over time. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze which patient and hospital characteristics independently influence the likelihood that a given patient undergoes ALBT. RESULTS: The overall blood transfusion rate (ie, the proportion of patients who received at least 1 transfusion of any kind) was 6.7%. This rate increased over time, from 4.9% in 2000 to 7.1% in 2009 (P < .001). Risk factors associated with ALBT included age, gender, race, insurance status, hospital region, and hospital annual caseload. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in overall blood transfusion rate in TSA found in the present study may be related to factors specific to TSA, such as the introduction of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during the study period. A variety of patient and hospital characteristics contribute to the risk of undergoing ALBT.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Transfusão de Sangue/tendências , Transfusão de Sangue Autóloga/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue Autóloga/tendências , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 26(3): 342-7, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534634

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To perform a national analysis of safety, charges, complications, and mortality of percutaneous image-guided renal thermal ablation and compare outcomes by hospital volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, trends in the proportion of inpatient percutaneous renal thermal ablation procedures performed at high-volume centers in the United States from 2007-2011 were evaluated. In-hospital mortality, discharge to long-term care facility, length of stay, hospitalization charges, and postoperative complications were compared between high-volume and low-volume ablation centers. High volume was set at the 90th percentile for renal thermal ablation volume, which equated to seven or more patients per year. A multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for hospital volume, age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, obesity, race, and insurance status was performed to analyze the influence of hospital volume on the above-listed outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 874 patients. The number of hospitals ranged from 59-77 depending on year. Overall, 328 patients (37.5%) were treated at high-volume ablation centers. The proportion of patients treated at high-volume centers decreased from 42.0% in 2007-2009 to 28.5% in 2010-2011. High-volume hospitals also performed significantly more partial nephrectomies than low-volume hospitals. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, increasing hospital volume was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02-0.95) and lower odds of discharge to a long-term care facility (OR = 0.00, 95% CI = 0.00-0.66). Increasing hospital volume was also associated with lower odds of blood transfusion (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94). Length of stay decreased with increasing hospital volume (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety may be maximized when renal ablation is performed at high-volume centers as a result of both greater procedural experience and potentially multidisciplinary triage and periprocedural management.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertermia Induzida/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Tamanho da Amostra , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Europace ; 16(7): 1078-82, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24966009

RESUMO

Clinical electrophysiology (EP) and catheter ablation of arrhythmias are rapidly evolving in recent years. More than 50 000 catheter ablations are performed every year in Europe. Emerging indications, an increasing number of procedures, and an expected high quality require national and international standards as well as trained specialists. The purpose of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the practice of requirements for EP personnel, equipment, and facilities in Europe. Responses to the questionnaire were received from 52 members of the EHRA research network. The survey involved high-, medium-, and low-volume EP centres, performing >400, 100-399, and under 100 implants per year, respectively. The following topics were explored: (i) EP personnel issues including balance between female and male operators, responsibilities within the EP department, age profiles, role and training of fellows, and EP nurses, (ii) the equipments available in the EP laboratories, (iii) source of patient referrals, and (iv) techniques used for ablation for different procedures including sedation, and peri-procedural use of anticoagulation and antibiotics. The survey reflects the current EP personnel situation characterized by a high training requirement and specialization. Arrhythmia sections are still most often part of cardiology departments and the head of cardiology is seldom a heart rhythm specialist. Currently, the vast majority of EP physicians are men, although in the subgroup of physicians younger than 40 years, the proportion of women is increasing. Uncertainty exists regarding peri-procedural anticoagulation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and the need for sedation during specific procedures.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Ablação por Cateter/instrumentação , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Descrição de Cargo , Masculino , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Auxiliares de Cirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Papel do Médico , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Especialização/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Cancer ; 119(10): 1845-52, 2013 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23456789

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Given the complexity of management of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), this study hypothesized that high hospital volume would be associated with receiving National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline therapy and improved survival in patients with advanced HNSCC. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify patients with advanced HNSCC. Treatment modalities and survival were determined using Medicare data. Hospital volume was determined by the number of patients with HNSCC treated at each hospital. RESULTS: There were 1195 patients with advanced HNSCC who met inclusion criteria. In multivariable analyses, high hospital volume was not associated with receiving multimodality therapy per NCCN guidelines (odds ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-1.60), but showed a nearly significant inverse association with survival in a model adjusted for National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center status, age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, marital status, comorbidity, year of diagnosis, tumor site, and tumor stage (hazard ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.69-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare patients with advanced HNSCC treated at high-volume hospitals were not more likely to receive NCCN guideline therapy, but had nearly statistically significant better survival, when compared with patients treated at low-volume hospitals. These results suggest that features of high-volume hospitals other than delivery of NCCN guideline therapy influence survival. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Serviço Hospitalar de Oncologia/normas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg ; 13(3): 237-42, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23395704

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There have been a large number of studies that have investigated the relationship between outcomes and provider volume for a wide variety of medical conditions and surgical conditions. The objective of this study was to explore the relation between hospital volume and risk-adjusted mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention between 2003 and 2004 in Korea. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of database in National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service and Korean National Statistical Office. The study data set confined to the ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes that were recorded in the National Health Insurance Review Agency. Risk modeling was performed through logistic regression and validated with cross-validation. The statistical performance of the developed model was evaluated using c-statistics, R², and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. Crude and risk-adjusted 30-day mortality was evaluated among patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) between 2003 and 2004 at low (less 200 cases/year), medium (200~399 cases/year), and high (400 cases or more/year) PCI volume hospitals. RESULTS: The final risk-adjustment model consisted of ten risk factors for 30-day mortality. These factors were found to have statistically significant effects on patient mortality. The c-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² goodness-of-fit test and the model's performance were good [R²=0.147, c-statistic 0.823, 4.1037 (p=0.8476)]. A total number of 60 low-volume hospitals (9.071 patients) and 27 medium-volume hospitals (15.623 patients) and 15 high-volume hospitals (19.669 patients) were included. Crude 30-day mortality rate was 1.4%, 1.1%, and 1.0% (p=0.0106) in each volume hospitals. But risk-adjusted mortality rate was not significantly different among three groups (1.3%, 1.0%, and 1.1% in each volume hospitals). CONCLUSION: Although we found a significant different crude 30-day mortality rates according to hospital PCI volume, but did not find a relationship between hospital volume and 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates following PCI in Korea.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Análise de Regressão , República da Coreia , Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
13.
BJU Int ; 111(2): 206-12, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23356747

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare early oncological outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) performed by high volume surgeons in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer by high volume surgeons performing RALP or ORP. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL or PSA ≥ 0.05 ng/mL with receipt of additional therapy. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate the association between surgical approach and BCR using a predictive model (nomogram) based on preoperative stage, grade, volume of disease and PSA. To explore the impact of differences between surgeons, multivariable analyses were repeated using surgeon in place of approach. RESULTS: Of 1454 patients included, 961 (66%) underwent ORP and 493 (34%) RALP and there were no important differences in cancer characteristics by group. Overall, 68% of patients met National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for intermediate or high risk disease and 9% had lymph node involvement. Positive margin rates were 15% for both open and robotic groups. In a multivariate model adjusting for preoperative risk there was no significant difference in BCR rates for RALP compared with ORP (hazard ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.56-1.39; P = 0.6). The interaction term between nomogram risk and procedure type was not statistically significant. Using NCCN risk group as the covariate in a Cox model gave similar results (hazard ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.47-1.17; P = 0.2). The interaction term between NCCN risk and procedure type was also non-significant. Differences in BCR rates between techniques (4.1% vs 3.3% adjusted risk at 2 years) were smaller than those between surgeons (2.5% to 4.8% adjusted risk at 2 years). CONCLUSIONS: In this relatively high risk cohort of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy we found no evidence to suggest that ORP resulted in better early oncological outcomes then RALP. Oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy may be driven more by surgeon factors than surgical approach.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Robótica/métodos , Urologia/normas , Idoso , Competência Clínica/normas , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia/mortalidade , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Robótica/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho
14.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 45(1): 65-75, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23164806

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In 2009 the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland reported its recommendations for The Provision of Vascular Services for Patients with Vascular Disease. The objective is to halve the UK elective surgery mortality rate for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm to 3.5% by 2013. From 16th March 2012, statutory approval has been given by Parliament to recognise Vascular Surgery as a Specialty in the UK. This study assesses the provision of vascular surgery in acute trusts across England. METHOD: From the Department of Health, 169 acute trusts were identified in England and each acute trust was emailed under the Freedom of Information Act. RESULTS: There was a 98.8% response rate. There are currently 80 trusts in England providing acute and elective arterial and aortic surgery, with 48 vascular hubs and 32 trusts which either provide a local on call network or are currently under review. Within the 48 vascular hubs there are a mean of 4.8 consultants and 3.75 middle grades. The on call rota was on average a 1 in 6. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that currently 80 trusts in England provide acute and elective arterial and aortic surgery with 48 centralised complex and arterial vascular services. An integrated vascular service will provide the best quality of care, develop the latest techniques and improve clinical standards.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Vasculares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Plantão Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Área Programática de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Centralizados no Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Avaliação das Necessidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Vasculares/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
J Registry Manag ; 39(2): 43-52, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23599028

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Prior studies reported associations of cancer center facility type and case volume with cancer outcomes (such as survival) and treatment-related processes (such as treatment with chemotherapy, surgery, or radiotherapy). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether facility characteristics are associated with use of broad (lumped) vs narrow (split) diagnoses in cancer pathology. DESIGN: We examined associations of facility characteristics and prevalence of broad diagnoses that might adversely affect treatment decisions (based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines) in National Cancer Data Base records for patients diagnosed from 2004-2008. Logistic regression was used to determine whether associations of facility type and volume with prevalence of broad diagnoses were independent of patient demographic/socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: Among 10 high incidence cancer sites, 5 had a prevalence of broad diagnoses exceeding 6%. For 4 of these, use of broad diagnoses was independently lower in NCI (National Cancer Institute)- designated comprehensive programs than in community programs, with multivariate prevalence ratios (PR) as low as 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.59) for uterine corpus cancers and 0.49 (95% CI 0.44-0.55) for kidney and renal pelvis cancers. Differences between low- and high-volume facilities were observed for 4 of the 5 sites, with multivariate PR as low as 0.67 (95% CI 0.59-0.77) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.82) for cancers of the uterine corpus and lung, respectively. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of broad cancer diagnoses varies independently by cancer site/type, facility type, and facility volume. Broader diagnoses tend to be used most often by community cancer centers and low-volume centers. This association has implications for use of registry data in pathology quality assessment and quality improvement.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/classificação , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Patologia Clínica/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/patologia , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA