Physicians in long-term recovery who are members of alcoholics anonymous.

BACKGROUND: There is little empirical literature on the experience in sobriety of long-term, committed members of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). OBJECTIVE: Studies on the experience of long-term members, however, can yield a better understanding of the role of spirituality in AA membership, and how the program helps stabilize abstinence. METHODS: We studied 144 physicians at a conference of doctors in AA. RESULTS: Respondents had a mean period of sobriety of 140 months. Compared to normative populations, they scored higher on scales for depression and anxiety, and were more adherent to the spiritual character of AA, rather than a formally religious orientation. Those who reported "having a spiritual awakening" were more likely to "experience God's presence" on most days (81% vs. 19%) and were less likely to report craving for alcohol (21% vs. 41%) than those who did not. Respondents who had a history of being enrolled in State Physicians' Health Programs did not differ significantly on any of the aforesaid subjective variables from those who were not enrolled. CONCLUSION: The experience of long-term AA members can be characterized in terms of abstinence, spirituality, and alcohol craving. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: The study of long-term AA members can shed light on mechanisms of achieving abstinence in this fellowship.

Mandatory naltrexone treatment prevents relapse among opiate-dependent anesthesiologists returning to practice.

OBJECTIVE: Anesthesiologists with opioid use disorders are at high risk for relapse. In 2005, the impaired professionals monitoring program of the State of Florida implemented a policy whereby anesthesiologists referred for opiate use disorders were contractually obligated to take naltrexone for 2 years. Naltrexone ingestion was witnessed and verified via random urine drugs screens or administered via intramuscular injection. METHOD: Charts were reviewed for the 11 anesthesiologists who underwent mandated pharmacotherapy with naltrexone, and 11 anesthesiologists who began monitoring immediately before implementation of this policy. RESULTS: Eight of 11 anesthesiologists who did not take naltrexone experienced a relapse on opiates. Only 1 of 11 anesthesiologists experienced a relapse on opiates after taking naltrexone, whereas another relapsed on an inhalant (nitrous oxide). It is noteworthy that 5 of the 11 anesthesiologists who took naltrexone had relapsed before naltrexone treatment, and 7 of the 11 anesthesiologists who did not take naltrexone experienced multiple documented relapses. Only 1 of the 11 anesthesiologists who did not take naltrexone successfully returned to the practice of anesthesiology. This individual suffered primarily from alcohol dependence, and suspected opiate abuse was never verified. Others who attempted return to anesthesiology (n = 7) suffered a relapse. In comparison, 9 of the 11 anesthesiologists who took naltrexone have returned to the practice of anesthesiology without a relapse (as verified by continued random urine and hair testing). CONCLUSION: Mandatory naltrexone treatment may provide anesthesiologists with an additional safeguard to successfully return to work.

Stress management training for surgeons-a randomized, controlled, intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Stress and coping influence performance. In this study, we evaluate a novel stress management intervention for surgeons. METHODS: A randomized control group design was used. Sixteen surgeons were allocated to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group received training on coping strategies, mental rehearsal, and relaxation. Performance measures were obtained during simulated operations and included objective-structured assessment of technical skill, observational teamwork assessment for surgery, and end product assessment rated by experts. Stress was assessed using the state-trait-anxiety-inventory, observer rating, coefficient of heart rate variability (C_HRV), and salivary cortisol. The number of applied surgical coping strategies (number of coping strategies [NC]) was assessed using a questionnaire. A t test for paired samples investigated any within-subject changes, and multiple linear regression analysis explored between-subject effects. Interviews explored surgeons' perceptions of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention group showed enhanced observational teamwork assessment for surgery performance (t = -2.767, P < 0.05), and increased coping skills (t = -4.690, P < 0.01), and reduced stress reflected inheart rate variability (t = -4.008, P < 0.01). No significant changes were identified in the control group. Linear regression analysis confirmed a significant effect on NC (ß = -0.739, P < 0.01). Qualitative data analysis revealed improved technical skills, decision making, and confidence. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had beneficial effects on coping, stress, and nontechnical skills during simulated surgery.

The ultimate curse.

This paper tells the story of a doctor in a vegetative state. The approach towards him is quite different from that towards a common patient. The other physicians cannot deal with this situation with the necessary open mind.