Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 169
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 58(3): 433-442, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369639

RESUMO

The complexity and inter-connectedness of operating in a global world for drug product supply has become an undeniable reality, further underscored by the COVID-19 pandemic. For Post-Approval Changes (PACs) that are an inevitable part of a product's commercial life, the impact of the growing global regulatory complexity and related drug shortages has brought the Global PAC Management System to an inflection point in particular for companies that have their products marketed in many countries.This paper illustrates through data analyzed for the first time from 145,000 + PACs for 156 countries, collected by 18 global pharma companies over a 3-year period (2019-2021), how severe the problem of global regulatory complexity is. Only PACs requiring national regulatory agency (NRA) approval prior to implementation were included in the data set. 1 of the 156 country NRAs approved all submitted PACs within a period of 6 months. The 6-month timeline was chosen because it is the recommended review timeline for major changes in the WHO guidance for vaccines and biotherapeutic products. 10 out of the 156 (6%) countries had no more than 10% of the PACs reviewed and approved in > 6 months. In 33 (22%) countries more than half of the PACs took > 6 months for approval. It is rare that the same PAC is approved globally within 6 months as individual NRAs take from a few months to years (in some cases > 5 years) for their review.The global PAC management complexity has steadily grown over the past 20 years. Attempts thus far to solve this problem have not made any meaningful difference. Senior leaders and decision-makers across the interdependent components of the complex Global PAC Management System (industry and regulators) must come together and collaboratively manage the problem holistically with the objective of ensuring global drug product availability instead of continuing with distinct stakeholder or country-focused solutions, which can tend to worsen the problem.In this paper, the Chief Quality Officers (CQOs) from 18 of the largest innovator pharma companies (see Acknowledgements) are speaking with One-Voice-of-Quality for PACs (1VQ for PACs Initiative). They are recommending a set of 8 approaches to activate a holistic transformation of the Global PAC Management System. This article presents their view on the problem of global regulatory complexity for managing PACs, it's impact on continual improvement and the risk to drug product supply, as well as approaches that can help alleviate the problem.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Humanos , Aprovação de Drogas/organização & administração , COVID-19 , Indústria Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão de Mudança , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Pharmacol Res ; 175: 106001, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34826602

RESUMO

The nutraceutical market is currently a high-impact multi-billion-dollar industry, and it is anticipated to grow rapidly over the next decade. Nutraceuticals comprise diverse food-derived product categories that have become widespread due to increased consumer awareness of potential health benefits and the need for improved wellness. This targeted review is designed to identify the current global trends, market opportunities, and regulations that drive the nutraceutical industry. Safety and efficacy concerns are also explored with a view to highlighting areas that necessitate further research and oversight. Key drivers of the nutraceutical market include aging populations, consumer awareness, consumer lifestyle, increasing cost of healthcare, and marketing channels. Although some nutraceuticals hold promising preventive and therapeutic opportunities, there is a lack of a universal definition and regulatory framework among countries. Moreover, there is a lack of adequate evidence for their efficacy, safety, and effectiveness, which was even further highlighted during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Future prospective epidemiological studies can delineate the health impact of nutraceuticals and help set the scientific basis and rationale foundation for clinical trials, reducing the time and cost of trials themselves. Together, an understanding of the key drivers of the nutraceutical market alongside a consistent and well-defined regulatory framework will provide further opportunities for growth, expansion, and segmentation of nutraceuticals applications.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Indústria Alimentícia/tendências , Animais , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Comércio , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Aprovação de Drogas , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Alimentícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Legislação sobre Alimentos/tendências , Medição de Risco
3.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0252551, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34166396

RESUMO

Our objective was to examine conflicts of interest between the UK's health-focused All-Party Parliamentary Groups (APPGs) and the pharmaceutical industry between 2012 and 2018. APPGs are informal cross-party groups revolving around a particular topic run by and for Members of the UK's Houses of Commons and Lords. They facilitate engagement between parliamentarians and external organisations, disseminate knowledge, and generate debate through meetings, publications, and events. We identified APPGs focusing on physical or mental health, wellbeing, health care, or treatment and extracted details of their payments from external donors disclosed on the Register for All-Party Parliamentary Groups. We identified all donors which were pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical industry-funded patient organisations. We established that sixteen of 146 (11%) health-related APPGs had conflicts of interest indicated by reporting payments from thirty-five pharmaceutical companies worth £1,211,345.81 (16.6% of the £7,283,414.90 received by all health-related APPGs). Two APPGs (Health and Cancer) received more than half of the total value provided by drug companies. Fifty APPGs also had received payments from patient organisations with conflicts of interest, indicated by reporting 304 payments worth £986,054.94 from 57 (of 84) patient organisations which had received £27,883,556.3 from pharmaceutical companies across the same period. In total, drug companies and drug industry-funded patient organisations provided a combined total of £2,197,400.75 (30.2% of all funding received by health-related APPGs) and 468 (of 1,177-39.7%) payments to 58 (of 146-39.7%) health-related APPGs, with the APPG for Cancer receiving the most funding. In conclusion, we found evidence of conflicts of interests through APPGs receiving substantial income from pharmaceutical companies. Policy influence exerted by the pharmaceutical industry needs to be examined holistically, with an emphasis on relationships between actors potentially playing part in its lobbying campaigns. We also suggest ways of improving transparency of payment reporting by APPGs and pharmaceutical companies.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Conflito de Interesses/economia , Humanos , Políticas , Reino Unido
4.
Gastroenterology ; 160(2): 614-623, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307023

RESUMO

The notion of probiotics as microbes that confer health benefits has its origins in the speculative ideas that are more than a century old, yet remain largely unsubstantiated by scientific evidence. The recent advances in microbiome science have highlighted the importance of intestinal microbes in human physiology and disease pathogenesis. These developments have provided a boost to the probiotics industry, which continues to experience exponential growth driven mainly by creative marketing. Consumers, patients, and most health care providers are not able to discern the underlying science or differentiate the permitted claims that promise vague health benefits from disease-specific claims reserved for drugs. No probiotic product has been able to satisfy the regulatory requirements to be categorized as a drug, a substance intended to cure, mitigate, or prevent disease. However, patients take probiotic products in the belief that they will help to treat their intestinal or systemic diseases. Thus far, the regulators have failed to create policies that would assist to inform the public in this area. In fact, the existing regulatory regime actually creates formidable barriers to research that could provide evidence for clinical efficacy of probiotic products. We propose a potential solution to this vexing problem, where a committee created through a partnership of academia, professional organizations, and industry, but free of potential conflicts of interest, would be charged with rigorous evaluation of specific probiotic products and the evidence in support of their different claims. Companies that would submit to this process would earn the trust of consumers and healthcare providers, as well as a distinction in the marketplace.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Legislação de Medicamentos , Probióticos , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Suplementos Nutricionais/normas , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Humanos , Legislação de Medicamentos/economia , Legislação de Medicamentos/normas , Probióticos/farmacologia , Probióticos/normas , Probióticos/uso terapêutico
5.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 56(4): 403-408, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346165

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ibuprofen is one of the widespread used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ibuprofen active ingredient is manufactured in many sites located all around the world. The aim of this paper was to classify the geographical source of ibuprofen active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) from the legal market, based on chemical characteristics and its impurity pattern and to define a geographical fingerprint. METHODS: To classify ibuprofen in different geographical groups, the chemometrics by principal component analysis (PCA) and Cluster analysis was applied to HPLC, 1H-NMR data of twenty-four samples of APIs from approved manufacturers located in different European and Asian countries. RESULTS: The PCA showed clearly two different geographical groups, based on particular patterns of European or Indian samples; the cluster analysis showed the similarity of group. CONCLUSION: The chemometric analysis is an important tool for tracking the geographical origin of APIs. This could be useful to supplement the quality control ensuring safety of the medicinal products in legal market and dealing with the evolving changes of the illegal market.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/química , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/classificação , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Ibuprofeno/química , Ibuprofeno/classificação , Espectroscopia de Prótons por Ressonância Magnética , Análise por Conglomerados , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Itália , Análise de Componente Principal
8.
J AOAC Int ; 102(4): 993-1002, 2019 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609950

RESUMO

Background: Regulatory affairs play a crucial role in the pharmaceutical industry and are incorporated in all stages of drug development. Objective: Approval criteria practices were developed as a resolution of the government's desire to create policies to protect public health by controlling the safety and efficacy of merchandise in areas including pharmaceuticals, complementary color medicines, veterinary medicines, medical devices, and even food products and cosmetics. Method: Herbal health products are in practices in all parts of the world under either their legal system's or expert council's or agencies' guides. They include botanicals, health supplements, health foods, complimentary medicines, traditional medicines or following pathies like Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy. The requisite parameters for registration or recognition of products by various major global regulatory agencies were reviewed, and compiled under purview. Results: In India, licensing these products is under the act provisions and the rules known as the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, whereas globally regulatory provisions follow the guidelines of developed countries like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, the Therapeutic Goods Act, or the World Health Organization's regulations for herbal products. Conclusions: The present communication highlights the provisions of regulatory and/or licensing requirements related to corporates, product composition, specifications, quality parameters, manufacturing methodology, stability, safety, preclinical studies, clinical studies, etc. for herbal products and the respective guidelines at one site. Highlights: Ultimately, all regulatory agencies across the world highlight majorly the safety and thereafter the efficacy for any products under the category.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação Médica , Ayurveda , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Preparações de Plantas , Austrália , Canadá , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Índia , Nova Zelândia , Estados Unidos
9.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 45(2): 208-216, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30427752

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A large part of the population of India prefers the traditional medicine (ayurvedic formulations) for primary health care. However, the effective quality control of herbal medicine is still a big challenge. Numerous reports indicate noncompliance with Compromised Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines by the manufacturers which may lead to adverse drug reactions or toxic effects. Asava and arishta are the classical herbal dosage forms wherein fermentation occurs during production leading to the generation of ethanol. The presence of ethanol in these preparations may lead to their misuse. The self-generated ethanol is responsible for extraction of active constituents and acts as a self-preservative. As the procedure for preparation for asava and arishta is same, the ethanol content is also expected to be the same irrespective of the manufacturer. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the ethanol content of some traditionally fermented ayurvedic formulations available in the market. METHOD: In this study, 20 formulations from 3 different manufacturers available as over-the-counter products were obtained and their ethanol contents were determined using gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were noted in the ethanol content of various ayurvedic formulations. A simple, less time-consuming, economic, and validated gas chromatographic method for estimation of ethanol in fermented ayurvedic formulations was also developed successfully in present study. CONCLUSION: The data generated during study reflected poor compliance of GMP guidelines by the manufacturers and hence the quality is being grossly compromised posing a safety hazard.


Assuntos
Etanol/análise , Ayurveda/normas , Preparações de Plantas/análise , Cromatografia Gasosa , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Fermentação , Humanos , Índia , Legislação de Medicamentos
10.
Am J Public Health ; 109(1): 73-82, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30495992

RESUMO

In North America, opioid use and its harms have increased in the United States and Canada over the past 2 decades. However, Mexico has yet to document patterns suggesting a higher level of opioid use or attendant harms.Historically, Mexico has been a country with low-level use of opioids, although heroin use has been documented. Low-level opioid use is likely attributable to structural, cultural, and individual factors. However, a range of dynamic factors may be converging to increase the use of opioids: legislative changes to opioid prescribing, national health insurance coverage of opioids, pressure from the pharmaceutical industry, changing demographics and disease burden, forced migration and its trauma, and an increase in the production and trafficking of heroin. In addition, harm-reduction services are scarce.Mexico may transition from a country of low opioid use to high opioid use but has the opportunity to respond effectively through a combination of targeted public health surveillance of high-risk groups, preparation of appropriate infrastructure to support evidence-based treatment, and interventions and policies to avoid a widespread opioid use epidemic.


Assuntos
Epidemias , Política de Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Canadá/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Características Culturais , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Tráfico de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigração e Imigração , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/legislação & jurisprudência , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , México/epidemiologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 104(3): 423-425, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30120783

RESUMO

The concept of "dietary supplements" is either a blessing for those focused on healthy lifestyles and personal management thereof or a crisis fraught with snake oil and drug analogs that are insidiously poisoning the gullible. Lost in this chatter is the role the ethical, and customer-focused industry takes to drive self-directing/self-governing initiatives to demonstrate unequivocally their position as responsible corporate citizens, meeting the needs of the ever-growing body of wellness-seekers.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais/normas , Indústria Farmacêutica/normas , Legislação de Medicamentos/normas , Fitoterapia/normas , Preparações de Plantas/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor/normas , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Fitoterapia/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Formulação de Políticas , Controle de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medição de Risco
14.
J Pharm Sci ; 107(7): 1773-1786, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29601839

RESUMO

Japan represents the third largest pharmaceutical market in the world. Developing a new biopharmaceutical drug product for the Japanese market is a top business priority for global pharmaceutical companies while aligning with ethical drivers to treat more patients in need. Understanding Japan-specific key regulatory requirements is essential to achieve successful approvals. Understanding the full context of Japan-specific regulatory requirements/expectations is challenging to global pharmaceutical companies due to differences in language and culture. This article summarizes key Japan-specific regulatory aspects/requirements/expectations applicable to new drug development, approval, and postapproval phases. Formulation excipients should meet Japan compendial requirements with respect to the type of excipient, excipient grade, and excipient concentration. Preclinical safety assessments needed to support clinical phases I, II, and III development are summarized. Japanese regulatory authorities have taken appropriate steps to consider foreign clinical data, thereby enabling accelerated drug development and approval in Japan. Other important topics summarized in this article include: Japan new drug application-specific bracketing strategies for critical and noncritical aspects of the manufacturing process, regulatory requirements related to stability studies, release specifications and testing methods, standard processes involved in pre and postapproval inspections, management of postapproval changes, and Japan regulatory authority's consultation services available to global pharmaceutical companies.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Indústria Farmacêutica , Animais , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Composição de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Avaliação de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação de Medicamentos/métodos , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/métodos , Excipientes/química , Humanos , Japão
16.
Am J Law Med ; 44(4): 607-626, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802165

RESUMO

Biomarkers are an important tool in modern drug development. The FDA has posited that increased use of biomarkers in clinical trials can accelerate pharmaceutical industry productivity, ushering new drugs to market. Accordingly, the FDA has created two pathways for evaluation of biomarker utility. Biomarkers incorporated into clinical trials, the traditional pathway, are effectively private to a therapeutic sponsor and to the scope of the trial. By contrast, in Biomarker Qualification ("BQ"), the second pathway, a biomarker is certified as a publicly available tool. The FDA has hoped that academic, non-profit, and industry stakeholders would work together in consortia to qualify biomarkers, cumulatively generating a common resource of broad utility. In practice, utilization of Biomarker Qualification has been paltry. Incentives for BQ that align with the interests of industry resource holders are necessary to fuel increased utilization of biomarkers in clinical trials and create the communal biomarker toolkit envisioned by the FDA. A blanket extension of exclusivity for any drug successfully paired with a companion biomarker would diminish public access to medicine by encouraging spurious biomarkers and correspondingly narrowed clinical trials. As a measured alternative, an exclusive right to include a qualified companion biomarker on an FDA drug label would balance public access externalities. This exclusivity would waylay label approval, and thus marketability, of later drugs relying on the qualified biomarker for clinical safety or efficacy. Accordingly, sponsors would find no incentive to portage an ineffective or unnecessary biomarker through clinical trials, as there would be no benefit to securing exclusive rights in a tool others saw no value in using.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Farmacológicos , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/normas , Rotulagem de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislação & jurisprudência
19.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28929207

RESUMO

It is the declared objective of the Falsified Medicines Directive 2011/62/EU to further improve the protection of patients from falsified pharmaceuticals. Therefore, it stipulates measures based on which falsified medicines in the supply chain can be more easily identified. This is the European legislature's reaction to an increase in falsified medicines. The EU Falsified Medicines Directive aims to create a uniform, standardized solution for protection from falsified drugs. From 9 February 2019 onward (according to the EU Regulation No. 2016/161), manufacturers may only release prescription drugs bearing two safety features into circulation and pharmacies may only dispense these drugs to patients following a successful authentication.The EU legislature demands that each EU member state establish a non-profit national medicines verification organisation (NMVO) that sets up and operates a national medicines verification system (NMVS) for the authentication of pharmaceuticals. In Germany, this is securPharm e. V., an alliance of the pharmaceutical industry, wholesalers and pharmacies. securPharm e. V. was established in 2011. Since 2013, pharmaceutical companies, wholesalers and pharmacies have been able to use the securPharm system for testing purposes. This article provides an overview of the current project progress of securPharm e. V. as of June 2017.


Assuntos
Medicamentos Falsificados , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , União Europeia , Fraude/legislação & jurisprudência , Fraude/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Tráfico de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Tráfico de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Alemanha , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência
20.
Cien Saude Colet ; 22(8): 2559-2569, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Português, Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28793072

RESUMO

The purpose of this article is to discuss and analyze the development challenges of the medicinal plants and phytotherapics industry in Brazil. This industry represents an excellent alternative to face the paradox of abundance that exists in the health area. The methodology adopted was a field research, using semi-structured questionnaires with companies, researchers and public managers to evaluate their development between 2009 and 2015 and to point out the most serious problems faced. The results observed indicate that the main challenges found were the regulation of law on the access to the genetic patrimony in the research area, and to bring into harmony the rules in the entire chain of medicinal plants and phytotherapics production area. The slow implementation pace of public policies for the industry shows a setback regarding both productive and research activities with medicinal plants and phytotherapics in the period.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Fitoterapia , Preparações de Plantas/uso terapêutico , Plantas Medicinais/química , Brasil , Desenho de Fármacos , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Política Pública , Pesquisa/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA