[Costs associated with multiresistant bacteria in neurorehabilitation]. / Mehrkosten durch multiresistente Erreger in der Neurorehabilitation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of patients with multiresistant bacteria (MRB) in rehabilitation facilities is increasing. The increasing costs of hygienic isolation measures reduce resources available for core rehabilitation services. In addition to the existing lack of care, patients with MRB are at further risk of being given lower priority for admission to rehabilitation facilities. Therefore, the Hygiene Commission of the German Society for Neurorehabilitation (DGNR) attempted to quantify the overall risk for deterioration of rehabilitation care due to the financial burden of MRB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To analyze the added costs associated with the rehabilitation of patients with MBR, the DGNR Hygiene Commission identified criteria for a cost assessment. Direct (consumables, personnel and miscellaneous costs) and indirect costs of loss of opportunity were evaluated in seven neurorehabilitation centers in different states across Germany. RESULTS: On average, hygienic isolation measures amounted to direct costs of 144 € per day (47 € consumables, 92 € personnel, 5 € for other costs such as extra transportation expenditure) and indirect costs of 274 €, totaling 418 € per patient with MRB per day. Given that approximately 10% of patients had MRB, the added costs of hygienic isolation measures equaled about one tenth of the overall budget of a rehabilitation center and can be expected to rise with the increasing numbers of patients with MRB. CONCLUSIONS: Admission of patients carrying MRB to neurorehabilitation centers triggers added costs that critically diminish the overall capacity for centers to provide their core rehabilitation services.

Antimicrobial consumption, costs and resistance patterns: a two year prospective study in a Romanian intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Due to the vulnerable nature of its patients, the wide use of invasive devices and broad-spectrum antimicrobials used, the intensive care unit (ICU) is often called the epicentre of infections. In the present study, we quantified the burden of hospital acquired pathology in a Romanian university hospital ICU, represented by antimicrobial agents consumption, costs and local resistance patterns, in order to identify multimodal interventional strategies. METHODS: Between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2013, a prospective study was conducted in the largest ICU of Western Romania. The study group was divided into four sub-samples: patients who only received prophylactic antibiotherapy, those with community-acquired infections, patients who developed hospital acquired infections and patients with community acquired infections complicated by hospital-acquired infections. The statistical analysis was performed using the EpiInfo version 3.5.4 and SPSS version 20. RESULTS: A total of 1596 subjects were enrolled in the study and the recorded consumption of antimicrobial agents was 1172.40 DDD/ 1000 patient-days. The presence of hospital acquired infections doubled the length of stay (6.70 days for patients with community-acquired infections versus 16.06/14.08 days for those with hospital-acquired infections), the number of antimicrobial treatment days (5.47 in sub-sample II versus 11.18/12.13 in sub-samples III/IV) and they increased by 4 times compared to uninfected patients. The perioperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment had an average length duration of 2.78 while the empirical antimicrobial therapy was 3.96 days in sample II and 4.75/4.85 days for the patients with hospital-acquired infections. The incidence density of resistant strains was 8.27/1000 patient-days for methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 7.88 for extended spectrum ß-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4.68/1000 patient-days for multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the most important circumstances collectively contributing to increasing the consumption of antimicrobials and high incidence densities of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the studied ICU, are represented by prolonged chemoprophylaxis and empirical treatment and also by not applying the definitive antimicrobial therapy, especially in patients with favourable evolution under empirical antibiotic treatment. The present data should represent convincing evidence for policy changes in the antibiotic therapy.

[Diagnostics and Eradication Therapy for MRSA Carriers in the Outpatient Sector: an Analysis of the Reimbursement Situation in the Light of Current Reimbursement Changes]. / Diagnostik und ambulante Eradikationstherapie von Trägern mit MRSA in der vertragsärztlichen Versorgung ­ Eine Analyse der Erstattungssituation im Kontext aktueller Vergütungsveränderungen.

Infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) occurs in both the inpatient and outpatient sector. The reimbursement for diagnostic services and eradication therapy in the outpatient sector was regulated for the first time on 01.04.2012 and after a 2-year test period, has been adopted into the standard range of care services. The aim of this retrospective study was to give an overview of the current situation in services and reimbursement in Germany and describe MRSA patients and their treatment in the outpatient sector. Secondary data, namely reimbursement data of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV) und the Physicians' Association (KV) Mecklenburg-West Pomerania for the period 01/04/2012-31/03/2014 were analyzed. Results show that on the federal level, MRSA services amounting to € 3,235,870.18 have been reimbursed and that diagnostic costs exceed treatment costs. In Germany, 5,627 doctors invoiced services related to MRSA; 51,56% of these were general practitioners and 21,25% specialists in internal medicine working in general practice. In the KV Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, patients were elderly (average age 69,13), cost for services were on average 27,76 €, and 76,85% of the patients were treated within one quarter. On the whole, there were regional differences in the identification and eradication of MRSA in the outpatient setting. In order to provide an extended base for a more efficient resource allocation in the health care sector, in addition to analysis of MRSA eradication from the medical point of view, attention needs to be paid to patient flow between the out- and inpatient sectors, as well as economic aspects.

Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 µg/mL to vancomycin: old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that agents other than vancomycin be considered for some types of infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin is 2 µg/mL or more. Alternative therapeutic options include daptomycin and linezolid, 2 relatively new and expensive drugs, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), an old and inexpensive agent. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and potential cost savings associated with use of TMP/SMX compared to linezolid and daptomycin. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. For calendar year 2009, unique adults (age >18 years) with infections due to MRSA with an MIC to vancomycin of 2 µg/mL were included if they received 2 or more doses of TMP/SMX and/or daptomycin and/or linezolid. Data were abstracted from patient charts and pharmacy records. RESULTS: There were 328 patients included in the study cohort: 143 received TMP/SMX alone, 89 received daptomycin alone, 75 received linezolid alone, and 21 patients received a combination of 2 or more of these agents. In univariate analysis, patients who received TMP/SMX alone had significantly better outcomes, including in-hospital (p = 0.003) and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid. Patients receiving TMP/SMX were also younger (p < 0.001), had fewer comorbid conditions (p < 0.001), had less severe acute severity of illness (p < 0.001), and received appropriate therapy more rapidly (p = 0.001). In multivariate models the association between TMP/SMX treatment and mortality was no longer significant. Antimicrobial cost savings associated with using TMP/SMX averaged $2067.40 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: TMP/SMX monotherapy compared favorably to linezolid and daptomycin in terms of treatment efficacy and mortality. Use of TMP/SMX instead of linezolid or daptomycin could potentially significantly reduce antibiotic costs. TMP/SMX should be considered for the treatment of MRSA infection with MIC of 2 µg/mL to vancomycin.

Cost effectiveness of three drugs for the treatment of S. aureus infections in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Resistance of microorganisms to existing antimicrobial agents threatens the effective utilization of available resources in sub-Saharan Africa. Cost-effective utilization of antibacterial agents is essential in effective health care delivery in Nigeria. OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost effective antibacterial agent in the treatment of S. aureus infections in Lagos metropolis. SETTING: The study was carried out in a teaching hospital, a specialist hospital, a referral center and two private hospitals. METHODS: Cost effectiveness analysis of ciprofloxacin, cefuroxime and gentamicin identified to be most effective agent against 463 clinical isolates of S. aureus obtained from the five hospitals was carried out on the basis of societal, health care and third party perspectives using 'decision table" as an analytical model. Criteria considered in the model included degree of efficacy of the agents, adherence tendencies and tolerability. Both direct (cost of drugs, diagnosis/monitoring, personnel and transportation) and indirect (loss of productivity) costs were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These include economic outcome as total therapy cost, clinical outcomes as extent of antibacterial effectiveness obtained from degree of antibacterial efficacy, a proxy measurement of cure rates, and adherence tendency. Humanistic outcome was also measured as tolerability prorated from literature reported degree of adverse drug reactions events, risk of infection and pains from drug administration. RESULTS: Ciprofloxacin tablet is a dominant option and much more cost-effective than either cefuroxime or gentamicin in the treatment of S. aureus in Lagos. Regardless of the perspective of analysis, ciprofloxacin has the least cost effectiveness ratio of NGN4214.66 ($28.09), NGN2392.63 ($16.00) and NGN2048.66 ($13.65) from societal, health care and third party payer perspectives, respectively. Sensitivity analysis by increasing the effectiveness index of gentamicin injection-the least cost effective option to the value for the most cost effective option did not change the results. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin should be used as first-line-treatment of S aureus in Lagos as it will lead to significant cost savings in the treatment of S. aureus infections.

Cost-effectiveness of adding decolonization to a surveillance strategy of screening and isolation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers.

We compared the cost-effectiveness of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) programme of active surveillance plus decolonization with the current Veterans Health Administration (VHA) strategy of active surveillance alone, as well as a common strategy of no surveillance. A decision-analytical model was developed for an inpatient stay time horizon, using the VHA's perspective. Model inputs were taken from published literature where available, and supplemented with expert opinion when necessary. Effectiveness outcomes were hospital-acquired MRSA infections and deaths avoided. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. In the base-case analysis, the strategy of active surveillance plus decolonization dominated (i.e. lower cost and greater effectiveness) both the comparison strategies of active surveillance and no surveillance. In addition, the active surveillance strategy dominated the strategy of no surveillance. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that at low levels of direct benefit of decolonization (1-4%), the strategy of active surveillance plus decolonization would no longer be dominant. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, active surveillance plus decolonization dominated both the other two strategies, and the active surveillance strategy dominated no surveillance in all of 1000 Monte Carlo simulations. These results provide a strong economic argument for adding an MRSA decolonization protocol to the current VHA active surveillance strategy.

[Practical consequences after MRSA identification in chronic wounds]. / Praktische Konsequenzen durch den Nachweis von MRSA in chronischen Wunden.

In the last years increasing of numbers dermatologic patients with chronic wounds and problem bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been reported. Even though it is still unclear if bacterial contamination with MRSA independently interferes with wound healing, both the logistic and therapeutic consequences of identifying MRSA are considerable for the patient and the treatment facility. In this review the practical consequences and the therapy options associated with the identification of MRSA in patients with chronic wounds are considered.

Phage therapy of staphylococcal infections (including MRSA) may be less expensive than antibiotic treatment.

The current drama of antibiotic resistance has revived interest in phage therapy. In response to this challenge, a phage therapy center was established at our Institute in 2005 which accepts patients from Poland and abroad with antibiotic-resistant infections. We now present data showing that efficient phage therapy of staphylococcal infections is no longer a treatment of last resort (when all antibiotics fail), but allows for significant savings in the costs of healthcare.

[The Dutch MRSA policy should be retained]. / Het Nederlandse MRSA-beleid is succesvol.

The Dutch methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 'search and destroy' policy is effective. MRSA should be banned from hospitals: MRSA infections are associated with increased mortality and costs. In addition, widespread use of vancomycin for treating MRSA infections encourages the spread and development of vancomycin-resistant micro-organisms.

The treatment of staphylococcal infections with special reference to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacoeconomic considerations.

The choice of antibiotics for the treatment of staphylococcal infections depends to a high degree on the susceptibility patterns in the hospital in question. These may be highly variable and considerable differences between countries and hospitals exist. The insight into the pharmacodynamic aspects of antimicrobial agents has increased considerably in the last 5 years, resulting in new treatments, such as once daily administration of aminoglycosides and continuous infusion of betalactam antibiotics. The antibiotic policy in Dutch hospitals for the treatment of staphylococcal infections is discussed. In most Western countries with a relatively low incidence of MRSA, penicillin-derivatives, such as flucloxacillin (or cloxacillin, methicillin and nafcillin) will be the drug of choice, because of their good in-vitro activity, low toxicity, good clinical efficacy and relatively low cost. If the incidence of MRSA increases, drugs such as the glycopeptides will be of more importance. This will of course have a clear economic impact, as both vancomycin and teicoplanin are considerably more expensive than agents such as flucloxacillin and oral treatment is not possible. Pharmacoeconomic aspects also play a role. As a rule, intravenous antimicrobial agents are considerably more expensive than the oral formulations. Before oral administration can be recommended, a reliable oral absorption, also in seriously ill patients, must have been demonstrated. Other aspects that influence the cost of therapy are hospital stay and the possibility of outpatient treatment.

Clinical and economic effects of mupirocin calcium on preventing Staphylococcus aureus infection in hemodialysis patients: a decision analysis.

This study was performed to determine the clinical and economic consequences of alternative strategies of preventing Staphylococcus aureus infection in chronic hemodialysis patients by use of intranasal mupirocin calcium to clear nasal carriage of S aureus. Decision analysis evaluated clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of three likely management strategies to address S aureus nasal carriage and prevent subsequent infection in chronic ambulatory hemodialysis patients: (1) screen for S aureus nasal carriage every 3 months and treat those with a positive test result with mupirocin calcium; (2) treat all patients weekly with mupirocin calcium; or (3) no prevention strategy, treat infection only. Rates of nasal carriage of S aureus, S aureus infection rates, proportion of infections attributable to nasal carriage, efficacy of mupirocin, natural history of infection, and patient management strategies were derived from the published literature and supplemented by a panel of experts. Actual payments for medical services were obtained from Medicare parts A and B. Incremental cost-effectiveness was calculated from the perspective of Medicare and subjected to sensitivity analyses. Assuming that 75% of S aureus infections are attributable to nasal carriage in hemodialysis patients, eliminating nasal carriage of S aureus with mupirocin calcium (with or without screening) markedly reduces the number of infections (45% to 55%) and also reduces health care expenditures relative to treating infections when they occur. Annual savings to Medicare are $784,000 to $1,117,000 per 1,000 hemodialysis patients, depending on the prevention strategy. Preventing S aureus infection by eradicating nasal carriage in chronic hemodialysis patients reduces morbidity while simultaneously reducing medical care costs. The decision to eliminate nasal carriage on a regular basis or use a screening test to guide antibiotic therapy is dependent on the tradeoff between improved short-term clinical and cost benefits and the potential for bacterial resistance that may arise from widespread use of mupirocin calcium.