Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is associated with pain and infertility. Surgical interventions aim to remove visible areas of endometriosis and restore the anatomy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of pain and infertility associated with endometriosis. SEARCH METHODS: This review has drawn on the search strategy developed by the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group including searching the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group's specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, reference lists for relevant trials, and trial registries from inception to April 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery with any other laparoscopic or robotic intervention, holistic or medical treatment, or diagnostic laparoscopy only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed selection of studies, assessment of trial quality and extraction of relevant data with disagreements resolved by a third review author. We collected data for the core outcome set for endometriosis. Primary outcomes included overall pain and live birth. We evaluated the quality of evidence using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 RCTs. The studies randomised 1563 women with endometriosis. Four RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with diagnostic laparoscopy only. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic excision with diagnostic laparoscopy only. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with laparoscopic ablation or excision and uterine suspension. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection with diagnostic laparoscopy only. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation with diagnostic laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation with laparoscopic excision. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with helium thermal coagulator with laparoscopic ablation or excision with electrodiathermy. One RCT compared conservative laparoscopic surgery with laparoscopic colorectal resection of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Common limitations in the primary studies included lack of clearly described blinding, failure to fully describe methods of randomisation and allocation concealment, and poor reporting of outcome data. Laparoscopic treatment versus diagnostic laparoscopy We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment on overall pain scores compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only at six months (mean difference (MD) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 1.49; 1 RCT, 16 participants; very low quality evidence) and at 12 months (MD 1.65, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.19; 1 RCT, 16 participants; very low quality evidence), where a positive value means pain relief (the higher the score, the more pain relief) and a negative value reflects pain increase (the lower the score, the worse the increase in pain). No studies looked at live birth. We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment on quality of life compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only: EuroQol-5D index summary at six months (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.18; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) mental health component (MD 2.30, 95% CI -4.50 to 9.10; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence) and SF-12 physical health component (MD 2.70, 95% CI -2.90 to 8.30; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence). Laparoscopic treatment probably improves viable intrauterine pregnancy rate compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only (odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.86; 3 RCTs, 528 participants; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only on ectopic pregnancy (MD 1.18, 95% CI 0.10 to 13.48; 1 RCT, 100 participants; low quality evidence) and miscarriage (MD 0.94, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.54; 2 RCTs, 112 participants; low quality evidence). There was limited reporting of adverse events. No conversions to laparotomy were reported in both groups (1 RCT, 341 participants). Laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection versus diagnostic laparoscopy We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection on adverse events (more specifically vascular injury) compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.32; 1 RCT, 141 participants; low quality evidence). No studies looked at overall pain scores (at six and 12 months), live birth, quality of life, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. Laparoscopic ablation versus laparoscopic excision There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was a difference in overall pain, measured at 12 months, for laparoscopic ablation compared with laparoscopic excision (MD 0.00, 95% CI -1.22 to 1.22; 1 RCT, 103 participants; very low quality evidence). No studies looked at overall pain scores at six months, live birth, quality of life, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage and adverse events. Helium thermal coagulator versus electrodiathermy We are uncertain whether helium thermal coagulator compared to electrodiathermy improves quality of life using the 30-item Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) at nine months, when considering the components: pain (MD 6.68, 95% CI -3.07 to 16.43; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence), control and powerlessness (MD 4.79, 95% CI -6.92 to 16.50; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence), emotional well-being (MD 6.17, 95% CI -3.95 to 16.29; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence) and social support (MD 5.62, 95% CI -6.21 to 17.45; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence). Adverse events were not estimable. No studies looked at overall pain scores (at six and 12 months), live birth, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only, it is uncertain whether laparoscopic surgery reduces overall pain associated with minimal to severe endometriosis. No data were reported on live birth. There is moderate quality evidence that laparoscopic surgery increases viable intrauterine pregnancy rates confirmed by ultrasound compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only. No studies were found that looked at live birth for any of the comparisons. Further research is needed considering the management of different subtypes of endometriosis and comparing laparoscopic interventions with lifestyle and medical interventions. There was insufficient evidence on adverse events to allow any conclusions to be drawn regarding safety.

Chinese Medicine Sequential Therapy Improves Pregnancy Outcomes after Surgery for Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Placebo Parallel Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine (CM) improving pregnancy outcomes after surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo parallel controlled clinical trial was designed. A total of 202 patients who had laparoscopy for endometriosis-associated infertility with qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome were included and randomly divided into the CM treatment group and placebo control group at a ratio of 1:1 using a central block randomization from May 2014 to September 2017, 101 patients in each group. The two groups received continuous intervention at 1-5 days after surgery, for 6 menstrual cycles. Before ovulation, the CM group was treated Huoxue Xiaoyi Granule (); after ovulation, Bushen Zhuyun Granule ( was involved. The control group was treated with placebo. Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed every menstrual cycle during the treatment, and female hormone levels in the follicular and luteal phases were measured during the 1st, 3rd and 6th menstrual cycles. The analysis was continued until pregnancy. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and pregnancy outcome, and the secondary outcomes were follicular development and endometrial receptivity. Safety evaluations were performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: (1) Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates: the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of the CM group were significantly higher than those of the placebo group [44.6% (45/101) vs. 29.7% (30/101), 34.7% (35/101) vs. 20.8% (21/101), both P<0.05]. (2) Follicle development: the incidence of dominant follicles, rate of cumulative cycle ovulation, and rate of cumulative cycle mature follicle ovulation were significantly higher in the CM group than those in the placebo group [93.8% (350/373) vs. 89.5% (341/381), 80.4% (275/342) vs. 69.1% (253/366), 65.8% (181/275) vs 56.1% (142/253), P<0.05 or P<0.01]). The incidence of cumulative cycle luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome was significantly lower in the CM group than in the placebo group [11.7% (40/342) vs. 17.8% (65/366), P<0.05). (3) Endometrial receptivity: after treatment, both endometrial types and endometrial blood flow types in the CM group were mainly types A and B, while those in the placebo group were mainly types B and C, with a significant difference between the two groups (both P<0.05). (4) Adverse events: the incidence of adverse events between the two groups was not significantly different (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Strategies for activating blood circulation-regulating Gan (Liver)-tonifying Shen (Kidney) sequential therapy can effectively improve the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of endometriosis-associated infertility with qi stagnation and blood stasis after laparoscopy, improve follicular development, promote ovulation, improve endometrial receptivity, while being a safe treatment option. (Trial registration No. NCT02676713).

Post-laparoscopic oral contraceptive combined with Chinese herbal mixture in treatment of infertility and pain associated with minimal or mild endometriosis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects fertility negatively. The study aims to evaluate whether laparoscopic surgery combined with oral contraceptive or herbs were more effective than laparoscopic alone in improving fecundity and pelvic pain in women with minimal/mild endometriosis. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 156 infertile women with minimal/mild endometriosis. After laparoscopic surgery, patients were randomized to three groups: in Group A (n = 52) oral contraceptive (OC) was administered one pill a day, continuous for 63 days without intervals, in Group B (n = 52) OC was administered as above and then Dan'e mixture was added 30 g/day for the latter 30 days, and in control Group C (n = 52) patients tried to get pregnant after surgery without complementary treatment. The follow-up periods were 12 months in Group C and 14 months in complementary medical treatment Group A and B. The pregnant women were further followed up, and labor and pregnancy outcomes were assessed. Primary outcome was pregnancy rate (PR) and live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes included changes of pelvic pain visual analog scale scores and side effects. Analyses were done as intention-to-treat. RESULTS: The PR was 46.80% (73/156), and the LBR was 69.86% (51/73). Of the 73 pregnancies, 60 occurred within 12 months of follow-up and 7 of the remaining 13 patients underwent assisted reproductive technology for >1 year. No significant difference was observed in PR and LBR among the three groups. Patients given medical treatment (OCs or OCs plus herbal medicine) had significantly decreased pain scores compared with the laparoscopy alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of laparoscopy with OCs or OCs and herbal medicine does not have more advantages than laparoscopy alone in improving fertility of women with minimal/mild endometriosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-TRC-11001820.

Multidisciplinary laparoscopic treatment for bowel endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a handicapping disease affecting young females in the reproductive period. It mainly occurs in the pelvis and affects the bowel in 3-37%. Endometriosis can cause menstrual and non-menstrual pelvic pain and infertility. Colorectal involvement results in alterations of bowel habit such as constipation, diarrhoea, tenesmus, and rarely rectal bleeding. A precise diagnosis about the presence, location and extent is necessary. Based on clinical examination, the diagnosis of bowel endometriosis can be made by transvaginal ultrasound, barium enema examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Multidisciplinary laparoscopic treatment has become the standard of care and depending on size of the lesion and site of involvement full-thickness disc excision or bowel resection is performed by an experienced colorectal surgeon. Anastomotic complications occur around 1%. Long-term outcome after bowel resection for severe endometriosis is good with a pregnancy rate of 50%.

[Uterine transplantation: animal and human studies]. / Transplantation de l'utérus : expériences animales et humaines.

Many cases of not life saving transplanted organs were described with the aim of improving quality of life. Uterus graft could be an alternative solution to adoption or surrogacy for women who have uterine factor infertility. Different animals' studies with mouse, sheep or monkey showed feasibility of the surgical technique with large vessels patch. One case of human uterine transplant has been reported but failed. Cold storage of the uterus in protective solution has been explored with mouse, sheep and human. Only pregnancy after uterus graft by syngenic mouse has been published. Results about pregnancy after allograft with sheep or monkey are necessary before pregnancy after human uterus graft becomes a reality.

External application of chinese drugs on acupoint Shenque combined with salpingostomy for treatment of sterility caused by obstruction of the fallopian tube--a clinical report of 45 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the therapeutic effect of external application of Chinese drugs on acupoint Shenque (CV 8) combined with salpingostomy for treatment of sterility caused by obstruction of the fallopian tube. METHOD: 75 cases were randomly divided into the following 2 groups. Forty-five patients in the treatment group were treated with external application of Chinese drugs on acupoint Shenque (CV 8) combined with salpingostomy, while 30 patients in the control group were treated with salpingostomy only. RESULTS: The results showed that in the treatment group, 26 cases were cured, 11 cases improved, and 8 cases failed, with a total effective rate of 82.22%; while in the control group, 14 cases were cured, 7 cases improved, and 9 cases failed, with a total effective rate of 70.00%. There is a significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The therapeutic effect of external application of Chinese drugs on acupoint Shenque combined with salpingostomy is better than that of salpingostomy only.

Valor de la esterilización femenina por mini laparotomía con anestesia local y acupuntura / Value of the female sterilization for mini laparotomy with local anaesthesia and acupunture

La esterilización femenina por mini laparotomía con el uso del método anestésico local y laacupuntura utiliza pocos recursos a diferencia del método anestésico general o raquídeo, loque requiere una evaluación de los resultados a largo plazo. Se realizó esterilizaciónquirúrgica a 423 pacientes desde Abril del 2001 hasta Diciembre del 2003. Se confeccionóuna encuesta en la que se analizan edad, área de salud, número de hijos, riesgospreconcepcional, tiempo quirúrgico, tiempo de recuperación, complicaciones, evoluciónpostoperatoria y aceptación del método. Se describe la técnica utilizada por nosotros. Seanalizó las indicaciones más frecuentes, la presencia del riesgo preconcepcional, laimportancia del uso de la acupuntura, el bajo número de complicaciones, el alto grado desatisfacción de las pacientes, el comportamiento de la tasa de mortalidad infantil en losúltimos años y el gran aporte económico para el país. Se exponen los resultados y seconcluyen lo ventajoso de este método en la actualidad (AU)

Surgical treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome associated with infertility.

Laparoscopic ovarian drilling is a relatively simple procedure performed by minimal access and usually on an outpatient basis. It provides an alternative treatment option for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients anovulatory to clomiphene citrate. The mechanism of action of laparoscopic ovarian drilling is unclear; its beneficial effect is apparently due to destruction of the androgen-producing stroma. The procedure appears to have little or no effect on insulin sensitivity and lipoprotein profile. The majority (56-94%) of PCOS patients who are clomiphene citrate resistant ovulate after drilling, and at least half of them go on to achieve a pregnancy. Predictive factors for pregnancy are younger age and lower body mass index. The endocrine changes resulting from ovarian drilling last for an extended period of time. Exogenous gonadotrophin treatment and laparoscopic ovarian drilling appear to yield comparable ovulation and pregnancy rates; however, multiple pregnancy is rare with drilling. There are several complications associated with the procedure, including post-operative periadnexal adhesion formation. Alternative treatment options, including lifestyle modification (diet and exercise) and metformin, may well reduce the need for ovarian drilling in well-selected cases. Progress in understanding of this complex syndrome and effective new treatments will further diminish the need for surgery.

Acupressure and the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopy.

The efficacy of currently available antiemetics remains poor. Concern with their side effects and the high cost of the newer drugs has led to renewed interest in non-pharmacological methods of treatment. We have studied the efficacy of acupressure at the P6 point in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopy, in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study of acupressure vs placebo. We studied 104 patients undergoing laparoscopy and dye investigation. The anaesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were standardized. Failure of treatment was defined as the occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting within the first 24 h after anaesthesia. The use of acupressure reduced the incidence of nausea or vomiting from 42% to 19% compared with placebo, with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.24 (95% CI 0.08-0.62; P = 0.005). Other variables were similar between groups.

Office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia.

Office laparoscopy under local anesthesia is especially suited to meet the current pressures of quality versus cost in an era of managed care. It is likely that this technique will soon become a major part of the practicing gynecologist's diagnostic operative armamentarium. Advantages of office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia are realized by the practitioner, the patient, and the managed care provider. Office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia is a safe, effective, and less costly tool for the evaluation of patients with many different indications. To date, the procedure has been primarily used for patients with infertility, chronic pelvic pain, and tubal ligation. The ease of scheduling, reduced costs, and rapid recovery suggest that it may be the preferred initial procedure for these patients.

New modalities under development for adhesion prevention: immunomodulatory agents and poloxamer barrier materials.

Obviously, no single modality will prove to be universally applicable or completely effective at preventing postoperative adhesion formation. Increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of peritoneal healing provides the intellectual basis for the development of specific interventions at critical points along the adhesion formation cascade. We believe that multimodality therapy, including the use of pharmacologic adjuvants such as immunomodulatory drugs and fibrinolytic/anticoagulant agents in conjunction with a barrier material tailored to the specific operative procedure may provide optimal results. Hopefully, developments in the 1990's will provide reproductive surgeons with the means to help patients derive maximal benefit from their reconstructive procedures.

[Early rehabilitative physiotherapy following microsurgical operations on the fallopian tubes]. / Ranniaia vosstanovitel'naia fizioterapiia posle mikrokhirurgicheskikh operatsii na matochnykh trubakh.

Clinical data, the findings of biorhythmologic studies and the results of kymographic perturbation evidence the efficacy of early restorative treatment with the use of preformed physical factors early (starting from the first day) after reconstructive microsurgery. Such treatment accelerates the postoperative adaptation of the body, improves the anatomy and function of the uterine tubes and promises a more favorable prognosis for the reproductive function recovery. Criteria for the differentiated application of 3 physical factors are presented, intermittent low-frequency magnetic field, supersonic current, low-frequency monopolar rectangular pulses for electrostimulation of the uterine tubes.

Selection of patients for IVF therapy or alternative therapy methods.

Microsurgery is the treatment of choice for most patients with a tubal factor. In-vitro fertilization--embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is performed in patients with the so-called classical indications: bilateral salpingectomy and tubal damage which is not correctable by means of microsurgery. We also discuss IVF in patients who have not conceived within 1 to 2 years following microsurgery. In women with tubal re-occlusion IVF should be performed. In patients with patent tubes following microsurgery, gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) forms part of a controlled clinical study. More clinical experience can perhaps solve the dilemma whether it is beneficial to perform GIFT or to offer IVF primarily to these patients. In patients with andrological infertility, GIFT is offered after six unsuccessful attempts of intrauterine insemination (IUI). In long-standing infertility, GIFT is performed when IUI with ovarian stimulation fails. Patients with genital pathology (patent tubes) are treated with GIFT unless it is not technically feasible. In these cases microsurgery or IVF should be discussed.

[Significance of prognostic factors in the treatment of tuboperitoneal infertility]. / Znachenie prognosticheskikh faktorov v lechenii trubnoperitoneal'nogo besplodiia.

The results of microsurgical treatment for tubo-peritoneal infertility are reported in 78 patients. Neosalpingostomy, combined with salpingo-ovariolysis, was performed in 51 patients, fimbriolysis and fimbrioplasty, in 8, tubal anastomosis in 7, and combined operations, in 12. Anatomical and functional assessment of the postoperative tubes was made using roentgeno-television hysterosalpingography, tubal insufflation and dynamic scintigraphy. Postoperative rehabilitation was supplemented by physical factors affecting tubal motility (supratonic frequency currents, tubal electrostimulation) with regard to the type of functional tubal disorder. Tubal patency was regained in 74.4%, and reproductive capacity, in 20.5% of the patients.

Culdotomy: a method of evaluating the pelvis.

PIP: This report is based on 502 culdotomies performed by the author and his associates. The method is commonly but erroneously called colpotomy . Of the 502 culdotomies, 293 were performed for tubal interruption, 209 were done for diagnosis and other surgical procedures. There were 9 complications, 3 requiring abdominal intervention. The operation is an incision into the cul-de-sac and is a practical means of investigating the pelvis to determine the status of the uterus, tubes, and ovaries. It has been the first step in vaginal hysterectomy technique. In the uncomplicated cases patients for tubal interruption were discharged from the hospital 42 hours after admission. No pregnancies have followed. W hen the operations were done for other purposes the hospital stay averag ed 72-96 hours. Preliminary evaluation includes a Papanicolaou smear. Chronic or recent pelvic inflammatory disease must be eliminated. Preoperative vaginal preparation with Gantrisin cream has been used. The operation may be done with a general or local anesthetic, preferably with an analgesic such as Demerol or morphine. Iv lactated Ringer's solution is also given and Valium at intervals. A transverse incision is made through the cul-de-sac. Unclotted blood encountered may indicate the existence of an ectopic pregnancy. Details of the technique are described. Approximately 30 minutes are required for the operation. Postoperatively the patient uses the Gantrisin cream 3 times weekly. Culdotomy is considered an efficent and practical approach to the pelvis for diagnosis and therapy. Discussion of the paper by others follows.^ieng