Reviewing novel treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major threat to global health and hospital-onset CRE infections have risen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel antimicrobials are now available for the treatment of CRE infections. There remains an urgent need for new antimicrobials for CRE, especially for those producing metallo-ß-lactamases. AREAS COVERED: This article discusses previously published research supporting currently available novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CRE infections. Newer compounds currently being evaluated in clinical trials are covered. A literature search was conducted in PubMed over all available dates for relevant published papers and conference abstracts with the search terms, 'CRE,' 'carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales,' 'ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor,' 'KPC,' 'NDM,' 'metallo-ß-lactamase,' 'ceftazidime-avibactam,' 'meropenem-vaborbactam,' 'imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam,' 'cefiderocol,' 'eravacycline,' 'plazomicin,' 'taniborbactam,' 'zidebactam,' and 'nacubactam.' EXPERT OPINION: Novel antimicrobials for CRE infections have been developed, most notably the ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though treatment options for infections with metallo-ß-lactamase producing Enterobacterales remain few and have limitations. Development of antibiotics with activity against metallo-ß-lactamase producing Enterobacterales is eagerly awaited, and there are promising new compounds in clinical trials. Finally, more clinical research is needed to optimize and individualize treatment approaches, which will help guide antimicrobial stewardship initiatives aimed at reducing the spread of CRE and development of further resistance.

Current treatment options for pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to briefly summarize the challenges associated with the treatment of pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), discuss its carbapenem-resistance, and review the literature supporting the current treatment paradigm and therapeutic options. RECENT FINDINGS: In a multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial the novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam-durlobactam was compared to colistin, both in addition to imipenem-cilastatin. The drug met the prespecified criteria for noninferiority for 28-day all-cause mortality while demonstrating higher clinical cure rates in the treatment of CRAB pneumonia. In an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial colistin monotherapy was compared to colistin combined with meropenem. In this trial, combination therapy was not superior to monotherapy in the treatment of drug-resistant gram-negative organisms including CRAB pneumonia. SUMMARY: CRAB pneumonia is a preeminent public health threat without an agreed upon first line treatment strategy. Historically, there have been drawbacks to available treatment modalities without a clear consensus on the first-line treatment regimen. CRAB pneumonia is a top priority for the continued development of antimicrobials, adjuvant therapies and refinement of current treatment strategies.

Efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin for the treatment of patients with serious infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex: a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial (ATTACK).

BACKGROUND: An urgent need exists for antibiotics to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam-durlobactam is a ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Acinetobacter, including multidrug-resistant strains. In a phase 3, pathogen-specific, randomised controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin, both in combination with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC. METHODS: The ATTACK trial was done at 59 clinical sites in 16 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with ABC-confirmed hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, ventilated pneumonia, or bloodstream infections were randomised 1:1 using a block size of four to sulbactam-durlobactam (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 3 h every 6 h) or colistin (2·5 mg/kg over 30 min every 12 h) for 7-14 days. All patients received imipenem-cilastatin (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 1 h every 6 h) as background therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC (the carbapenem-resistant ABC microbiologically modified intention-to-treat population). Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference was less than +20%. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of nephrotoxicity assessed using modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease criteria measured by creatinine level or glomerular filtration rate through day 42. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03894046. FINDINGS: Between Sep 5, 2019, and July 26, 2021, 181 patients were randomly assigned to sulbactam-durlobactam or colistin (176 hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, or ventilated pneumonia; and five bloodstream infections); 125 patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC isolates were included in the primary efficacy analysis. 28-day all-cause mortality was 12 (19%) of 63 in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 20 (32%) of 62 in the colistin group, a difference of -13·2% (95% CI -30·0 to 3·5), which met criteria for non-inferiority. Incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly (p<0·001) lower with sulbactam-durlobactam than colistin (12 [13%] of 91 vs 32 [38%] of 85). Serious adverse events were reported in 36 (40%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 42 (49%) of 86 patients in the colistin group. Treatment-related adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in ten (11%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 14 (16%) of 86 patients in the colistin group. INTERPRETATION: Our data show that sulbactam-durlobactam was non-inferior to colistin, both agents given in combination with imipenem-cilastatin, for the primary endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality. Sulbactam-durlobactam was well tolerated and could be an effective intervention to reduce mortality from serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC, including multidrug-resistant strains. FUNDING: Entasis Therapeutics and Zai Lab.

Impact of a real-time diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship workflow on time to appropriate therapy for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms.

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative organisms cause life-threatening infections, and the incidence is rising globally. Timely therapy for these infections has a direct impact on patient survival. This study aimed to determine the impact of a multidisciplinary diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) workflow on time to appropriate therapy (TAP) for these infections using novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors. METHODS: This was a retrospective quasi-experimental study of adult patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas (MDR PsA) infections at a 1500 bed university hospital. Included patients who received ≥ 72 hours of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) or ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) from December 2017 to December 2019. During the pre-intervention period (December 2017 to December 2018), additional susceptibilities (including CZA and C/T) were performed only upon providers' request. In 2019, reflex algorithms were implemented for faster identification and testing of all CRE/MDR PsA isolates. Results were communicated in real-time to the AMS team to tailor therapy. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included, with no between-group differences at baseline. The median age was 60 years and 56 (56.7%) were in intensive care at the time of culture collection. Identified organisms included 71 (71.7%) MDR PsA and 26 CRE, of which 18 were carbapenemase producers (Klebsiella-producing carbapenemase = 12, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase = 4, Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase = 2). The most common infections were pneumonia (49.5%) and bacteraemia (30.3%). A decrease was found in median TAP (103 [IQR 76.0-156.0] vs. 75 [IQR 56-100] hours; P < 0.001). Median time from culture collection to final susceptibility results was shorter in the post-intervention group (123 vs. 93 hours; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified improvement in TAP in MDR PsA and CRE infections with implementation of a reflex microbiology workflow and multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Simultaneous and divergent evolution of resistance to cephalosporin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and imipenem/relebactam following ceftazidime/avibactam treatment of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and characterize the emergence of resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam in a patient receiving ceftazidime/avibactam treatment for an MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa CNS infection. METHODS: One baseline (PA1) and two post-exposure (PA2 and PA3) isolates obtained before and during treatment of a nosocomial P. aeruginosa meningoventriculitis were evaluated. MICs were determined by broth microdilution. Mutational changes were investigated through WGS. The impact on ß-lactam resistance of mutations in blaPDC and mexR was determined through cloning experiments and complementation assays. RESULTS: Isolate PA1 showed baseline resistance mutations in DacB (I354A) and OprD (N142fs) conferring resistance to conventional antipseudomonals but susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. Post-exposure isolates showed two divergent ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant phenotypes associated with distinctive mutations affecting the intrinsic P PDC ß-lactamase (S254Ins) (PA2: ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant) or MexAB-OprM negative regulator MexR in combination with modification of PBP3 (PA3: ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam-relebactam-resistant). Cloning experiments demonstrated the role of PDC modification in resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Complementation with a functional copy of the mexR gene in isolate PA3 restored imipenem/relebactam susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how P. aeruginosa may simultaneously develop resistance and compromise the activity of new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations when exposed to ceftazidime/avibactam through selection of mutations leading to PDC modification and up-regulation of MexAB-OprM-mediated efflux.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: microbiology from clinical studies, and development of resistance during treatment.

As one of a series of thematically linked reviews of the primary pharmacology of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime/avibactam, this article reviews the microbiological findings in drug-exposed patients. Earlier articles in the series focused on basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52) and the development and mechanisms of resistance in vitro (J Antimicrob Chemother 2023: Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac449). In clinical trials of ceftazidime/avibactam, combined favourable microbiological responses for evaluable patients infected at baseline by susceptible Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 86.1% (851/988). The corresponding percent favourable among patients infected by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant pathogens was 58.8% (10/17), noting that the majority (15/17) of the resistant examples were P. aeruginosa. Microbiological response rates to comparator treatments in the same clinical trials ranged between 64% and 95%, depending on the type of infection and the analysis population. Uncontrolled case studies over a wide range of patients infected by antibiotic multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria have demonstrated that ceftazidime/avibactam can elicit microbiological clearance of ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible strains. In case studies where a matched cohort of patients had been treated with antibacterial agents other than ceftazidime/avibactam, microbiological outcomes were comparable between treatments, mostly being observationally more favourable for ceftazidime/avibactam (recognizing that numbers were too small for definitive superiority assessments). Development of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam during therapy is reviewed. The phenomenon has been reported multiple times, mostly in difficult-to-treat patients infected by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Molecular mechanisms, when determined, have frequently been observed previously in vitro, such as the 'Ω-loop' D179Y (Asp179Tyr) substitution found in KPC variant enzymes. In human volunteers exposed to therapeutic levels of ceftazidime/avibactam, faecal numbers of Escherichia coli, other enterobacteria, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, clostridia and Bacteroides spp. decreased. Clostridioides difficile was detected in the faeces, but this was of uncertain significance, because no unexposed controls were studied.

A novel method to evaluate ceftazidime/avibactam therapy in patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobactericeae (CPE) bloodstream infections.

INTRODUCTION: This study reports experience managing eight patients with bloodstream infections treated with a continuous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam. METHODS: Patients who were treated for documented CPE BSIs susceptible to CAZ-AVI and who underwent real-time therapeutic drug monitoring were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime MICs were assessed in presence of increasing concentrations of avibactam by the broth microdilution method. An inhibitory sigmoid Emax model was used to characterize ceftazidime MIC reduction as a function of avibactam concentration, and the MICi was derived by conditioning the best-fit model using steady-state avibactam concentrations (Css). Ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio was calculated for each patient and correlated to microbiological outcome. RESULTS: By adopting the innovative concept of effective MIC with an inhibitor (MICi), a trend towards higher microbiological failure and resistance development was found in patients with a lower ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio (2/3 vs. 0/5). CONCLUSION: Assessment of changes in the ceftazidime MIC in relation to increasing avibactam concentration could represent a more robust pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic method for predicting microbiological failure given beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in various combinations for the treatment of experimental osteomyelitis due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) bone infections is poorly defined. This study evaluated the efficacy of the novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor-ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-with different antibiotic combinations in an experimental model of CPE osteomyelitis. METHODS: KPC-99YC is a clinical strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with intermediate susceptibility to meropenem (MIC 4 mg/L), gentamicin (MIC 0.25 mg/L), colistin (MIC 0.25 mg/L), fosfomycin (MIC 4 mg/L) and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC 1 mg/L). Time-kill curves were performed at 4x MIC. Osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of 2×108 CFU of KPC-99YC. Six groups started treatment 14 days later for 7 days: control, colistin, CAZ-AVI, CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin, CAZ-AVI plus colistin and CAZ-AVI plus fosfomycin. Antibiotic dosages were selected to simulate plasma concentrations obtained in humans. Treatment was evaluated according to bone cultures quantified in log10 CFU. RESULTS: In vitro, CAZ-AVI plus colistin or gentamicin were rapidly bactericidal in contrast with CAZ-AVI plus fosfomycin. In vivo, compared with controls, colistin alone (P = 0.045) and CAZ-AVI alone or in combination significantly lowered bone bacterial counts (P < 0.001). Bone sterilisation was achieved in 67% and 100% of animals with combinations of CAZ-AVI plus colistin or gentamicin (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively) whereas other treatments were no different from controls. CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin provided greater bone bacterial reduction than CAZ-AVI plus colistin (P = 0.033). No CAZ-AVI-resistant strains emerged in treated rabbits, regardless of combination. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin was the best effective combination therapy. Combinations with CAZ-AVI appear to be a promising treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis.

Activity of newest generation ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination therapies against multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Multidrug resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa accounts for 35% of all P. aeruginosa isolated from respiratory samples of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The usefulness of ß-lactam antibiotics for treating CF, such as carbapenems and later generation cephalosporins, is limited by the development of antibacterial resistance. A proven treatment approach is the combination of a ß-lactam antibiotic with a ß-lactamase inhibitor. New ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations are available, but data are lacking regarding the susceptibility of MDR CF-associated P. aeruginosa (CFPA) to these new combination therapies. In this study we determined MIC values for three new combinations; imipenem-relebactam (I-R), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) against MDR CFPA (n = 20). The MIC90 of I-R, CZA, and C/T was 64/4, 32/4, and 16/8 (all µg/mL), respectively. The susceptibility of isolates to imipenem was not significantly improved with the addition of relebactam (p = 0.68). However, susceptibility to ceftazidime was significantly improved with the addition of avibactam (p < 0.01), and the susceptibility to C/T was improved compared to piperacillin/tazobactam (p < 0.05) These data provide in vitro evidence that I-R may not be any more effective than imipenem monotherapy against MDR CFPA. The pattern of susceptibility observed for CZA and C/T in the current study was similar to data previously reported for non-CF-associated MDR P. aeruginosa.

Strongly Bactericidal All-Oral ß-Lactam Combinations for the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Lung Disease.

Bioactive forms of oral ß-lactams were screened in vitro against Mycobacterium abscessus with and without the bioactive form of the oral ß-lactamase inhibitor avibactam ARX1796. Sulopenem was equally active without avibactam, while tebipenem, cefuroxime, and amoxicillin required avibactam for optimal activity. Systematic pairwise combination of the four ß-lactams revealed strong bactericidal synergy for each of sulopenem, tebipenem, and cefuroxime combined with amoxicillin in the presence of avibactam. These all-oral ß-lactam combinations warrant clinical evaluation.

Development of Resistance to Eravacycline by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Collateral Sensitivity-Guided Design of Combination Therapies.

The evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance is exhausting the list of currently used antibiotics and endangers those in the pipeline. The combination of antibiotics is a promising strategy that may suppress resistance development and/or achieve synergistic therapeutic effects. Eravacycline is a newly approved antibiotic that is effective against a variety of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. However, the evolution of resistance to eravacycline and strategies to suppress the evolution remain unexplored. Here, we demonstrated that a carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate quickly developed resistance to eravacycline, which is mainly caused by mutations in the gene encoding the Lon protease. The evolved resistant mutants display collateral sensitivities to ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combinations aztreonam/avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam. Proteomic analysis revealed upregulation of the multidrug efflux system AcrA-AcrB-TolC and porin proteins OmpA and OmpU, which contributed to the increased resistance to eravacycline and susceptibility to BLBLIs, respectively. The combination of eravacycline with aztreonam/avibactam or ceftazidime-avibactam suppresses resistance development. We further demonstrated that eravacycline-resistant mutants evolved from an NDM-1-containing K. pneumoniae strain display collateral sensitivity to aztreonam/avibactam, and the combination of eravacycline with aztreonam/avibactam suppresses resistance development. In addition, the combination of eravacycline with aztreonam/avibactam or ceftazidime-avibactam displayed synergistic therapeutic effects in a murine cutaneous abscess model. Overall, our results revealed mechanisms of resistance to eravacycline and collateral sensitivities to BLBLIs and provided promising antibiotic combinations in the treatment of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. IMPORTANCE The increasing bacterial antibiotic resistance is a serious threat to global public health, which demands novel antimicrobial medicines and treatment strategies. Eravacycline is a newly approved antibiotic that belongs to the tetracycline antibiotics. Here, we found that a multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate rapidly developed resistance to eravacycline and the evolved resistant mutants displayed collateral sensitivity to antibiotics aztreonam/avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam. We demonstrated that the combination of eravacycline with aztreonam/avibactam or ceftazidime-avibactam repressed resistance development and improved the treatment efficacies. We also elucidated the mechanisms that contribute to the increased resistance to eravacycline and susceptibility to aztreonam/avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam. This work demonstrated the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and collateral sensitivity and provided a new therapeutically option for effective antibiotic combinations.

OXA-48-Like ß-Lactamases: Global Epidemiology, Treatment Options, and Development Pipeline.

Modern medicine is threatened by the rising tide of antimicrobial resistance, especially among Gram-negative bacteria, where resistance to ß-lactams is most often mediated by ß-lactamases. The penicillin and cephalosporin ascendancies were, in their turn, ended by the proliferation of TEM penicillinases and CTX-M extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. These class A ß-lactamases have long been considered the most important. For carbapenems, however, the threat is increasingly from the insidious rise of a class D carbapenemase, OXA-48, and its close relatives. Over the past 20 years, OXA-48 and "OXA-48-like" enzymes have proliferated to become the most prevalent enterobacterial carbapenemases across much of Europe, Northern Africa, and the Middle East. OXA-48-like enzymes are notoriously difficult to detect because they often cause only low-level in vitro resistance to carbapenems, meaning that the true burden is likely underestimated. Despite this, they are associated with carbapenem treatment failures. A highly conserved incompatibility complex IncL plasmid scaffold often carries blaOXA-48 and may carry other antimicrobial resistance genes, leaving limited treatment options. High conjugation efficiency means that this plasmid is sometimes carried by multiple Enterobacterales in a single patient. Producers evade most ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though promising agents have recently been licensed, notably ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol. The molecular machinery enabling global spread, current treatment options, and the development pipeline of potential new therapies for Enterobacterales that produce OXA-48-like ß-lactamases form the focus of this review.

Rapid, simple, and economical LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of ceftazidime and avibactam in human plasma and its application in therapeutic drug monitoring.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens continue to threaten public health. Avibactam (AVI), a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor, has been approved for use with ceftazidime (CAZ) mainly against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is urgently needed to optimize dosage regimens to maximize efficacy, minimize toxicity, and delay the emergence of resistance. This study aims to develop and validate a rapid, simple, and economical LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of CAZ/AVI in human plasma. METHODS: Samples were processed by simple protein precipitation, and gradient elution strategy was applied to separate CAZ and AVI on a reverse-phase C18 column; with subsequent detection by the mass spectrometer in a positive and negative ion switching mode. Plasma samples from patients were analysed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A 4-min run of LC-MS/MS was developed. The precision, trueness, matrix effect, extraction recovery, carry-over, dilution integrity, and stability were all acceptable for a bioanalytical method. The method was successfully applied to the determination of CAZ and AVI in patients, and a considerable PK variability of CAZ/AVI was observed among patients. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: A robust, rapid, simple, and economical LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of CAZ and AVI was developed. The considerable PK variability of CAZ/AVI among patients demonstrates the clinical significance of TDM.

Are there differences between ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in treating patients with complicated abdominal infections? Evidence from clinical trials.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) are new possibilities of antimicrobial treatment that combined a ß-lactam with a ß-lactamase inhibitor. The United States (US) and European regulatory agencies approved their clinical use in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections. This study aims to know if one of the two antibiotics obtain better efficacy in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections and by specific pathogens such as P. aeruginosa or E. coli. A search of all trials in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science comparing a C/T or CZA based antimicrobial regimen with other treatments in patients with intraabdominal infections until August 2021 was performed. To make indirect comparisons, we used a frequentist approach using the R package netmeta.The effects have been expressed through the relative risk (RR) with its confidence interval. Considering the clinical cure and failure rates between the different trial populations (mMITT, CE, ME) and the mortality at the end of the study, we have not found significant differences between CZA and C/T. In the case of Pseudomonas, the RR of treatment failure between these two antibiotics is 1 (95% CI 0.55-1.18). In the case of E. Coli, although it seems that CZA would have a worse result than C/T, differences did not reach statistical significance (RR1.06; 95% CI 0.9-1.14). In conclusion, we have not found statistically significant differences between ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam in treating cIAI. In regards to E. Coli, our results do not reach significance, but it would be possible that C/T and meropenem had better results than CZA. Perhaps new trials would allow a better profile of the role in different types of patients or infections caused by specific microorganisms in the future.

Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a case for cefiderocol.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections constitute a serious clinical threat globally. Patients are often critically ill and/or immunocompromised. Antibiotic options are limited and are currently centered on beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combinations and the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the mechanisms of P. aeruginosa resistance and their potential impact on the activity of current treatment options, along with evidence for the clinical efficacy of BL-BLI combinations in P. aeruginosa infections, some of which specifically target infections due to CR organisms. The preclinical and clinical evidence supporting cefiderocol as a treatment option for P. aeruginosa involving infections is also reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Cefiderocol is active against most known P. aeruginosa mechanisms mediating carbapenem resistance. It is stable against different serine- and metallo-beta-lactamases, and, due to its iron channel-dependent uptake mechanism, is not impacted by porin channel loss. Furthermore, the periplasmic level of cefiderocol is not affected by upregulated efflux pumps. The potential for on-treatment resistance development currently appears to be low, although more clinical data are required. Information from surveillance programs, real-world compassionate use, and clinical studies demonstrate that cefiderocol is an important treatment option for CR P. aeruginosa infections.

Staphylococcus aureus-targeting peptide/surfactant assemblies for antibacterial therapy.

To address the challenge from microbial resistance, this work developed a surfactant with 18-carbon single hydrocarbon chain and multi-amine head groups (C18N3). After assembling with Staphylococcus aureus-targeting peptide (CARG), the obtained C18N3/CARG assemblies exhibited excellent antimicrobial activities against Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in vivo, in which the targeting peptide CARG bonded specifically to Staphylococcus aureus and C18N3 killed bacteria with a mechanism of membrane disruption. Importantly, C18N3 could also work as a ß-lactamase inhibitor to overcome the bacterial resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics through noncompetitive inhibition. The combination of ß-lactam antibiotic and C18N3/CARG assemblies more effectively suppressed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in vivo relative to equivalent dose of free antibiotic or C18N3. Thus, the antibacterial platform of antibiotic-carrying surfactant assemblies bearing bacteria-targeted peptides, in which C18N3 performed dual function, antibacterial agent and ß-lactamase inhibitor, may help fight against the difficult-to-treat infections.

Comparative activity of newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients hospitalized with pneumonia in European medical centers in 2020.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were consecutively collected from patients with pneumonia in 29 medical centers in 2020 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution method. Ceftazidime-avibactam (95.5% susceptible), imipenem-relebactam (94.3% susceptible), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (93.3% susceptible) were the most active compounds after colistin (99.5% susceptible). Susceptibility rates for the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLIs) varied against isolates resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, and/or ceftazidime. Ceftazidime-avibactam was the most active BL/BLI against resistant subsets from Western Europe, whereas imipenem-relebactam was slightly more active than other BL/BLIs against resistant subsets from Eastern Europe. Susceptibility rates were markedly lower in Eastern Europe than Western Europe.

Population pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam in very elderly hospitalized patients and considerations for target attainment against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin/tazobactam is frequently used to treat infections in very elderly patients. This study aimed to conduct a population pharmacokinetic analysis of CI piperacillin/tazobactam, and to identify optimal dosages for safe and effective probability of target attainment (PTA) against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Non-linear mixed-effects modelling was performed with Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulations assessed the steady-state concentration (Css) of increasing piperacillin/tazobactam regimens (from 2.25 to 18 g daily by continuous infusion). Permissible doses were defined as those associated with <10% probability of Css >157.2 mg/L. PTA at the pharmacodynamic targets of free plasma steady-state concentration (fCss)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥1 and ≥4 and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against EUCAST MIC distribution were also calculated. A total of 141 patients (median age 85 years) provided 217 plasma piperacillin Css. Most patients (55.2%) had hospital-acquired pneumonia and intra-abdominal infections. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with parallel linear and Michaelis-Menten elimination best described piperacillin data. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) was the covariate retained by the model. Pharmacokinetic estimates were 6.05 L/h for clearance and 3.39 mg/L for the Michaelis-Menten constant. Permissible doses were up to 4.5, 9, 11.25 and 13.5 g daily by continuous infusion for patients with CLCR of 0-19, 20-39, 40-59 and 60-79 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. At the clinical breakpoint of 8 mg/L, the permissible doses only achieved optimal PTA for fCss/MIC ≥1 in patients with CLCR 20-79 mL/min/1.73 m2. Optimal CFRs with the permissible doses were only attained against Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Permissible dosages and CLCR should be considered for prescribing CI piperacillin/tazobactam in very elderly patients.

Evaluation of the post-antibiotic effect in vivo for the combination of a ß-lactam antibiotic and a ß-lactamase inhibitor: ceftazidime-avibactam in neutropenic mouse thigh and lung infections.

The post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of ceftazidime-avibactam in vivo was evaluated using models of thigh- and lung-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic mice. In thigh-infected mice, the PAE was negative (-2.18 to -0.11 h) for three of four strains: caused by a 'burst' of rapid bacterial growth after the drug concentrations had fallen below their pre-specified target values. With lung infection, PAE was positive, and longer for target drug concentrations in ELF (>2 h) than plasma (1.69-1.88 h). The time to the start of regrowth was quantified as a new parameter, PAER, which was positive (0.35-1.00 h) in both thigh- and lung-infected mice. In the context that measurements of the PAE of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations in vivo have not previously been reported, it is noted that the negative values were consistent with previous measurements of the PAE of ceftazidime-avibactam in vitro and of ceftazidime alone in vivo.

Mono vs. combo regimens with novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: insights from the literature.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) and imipenem-relebactam (I-R) are combinations of old ß-lactams with novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) able to inhibit some carbapenemases, such as the KPC-type, thus are becoming the standard for difficult-to-treat carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE); a practical question is whether these novel BLBLIs should be used as monotherapy or as part of a combination regimen with other antibiotics, and if so, with which ones, to reduce the emergence of resistant strains and to optimize their efficacy. In this short review, we assessed clinical outcomes in patients with CPE-infections treated with the novel BLBLIs as mono- or combo-regimens, and laboratory studies on the synergistic effects with other antimicrobials. Available evidence on combination therapy is scarce and mainly limited to retrospective studies involving 630 patients treated with CZA: aminoglycosides were used in 39.6% of 336 patients treated with combo-regimens, followed by polymyxin B/colistin (24.4%), tigecycline (24.1%), carbapenems (13.4%) and fosfomycin (5.4%). Aminoglycosides could be useful in case of bloodstream and severe urinary infections. Pneumonia is a risk factor for CZA-resistance emergence: fosfomycin, due to favorable lung pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, could represent an interesting partner; fosfomycin could be added also for osteomyelitis. Tigecycline could be preferred for intrabdominal and skin-soft tissue infections. Due to nephrotoxicity and lack of in vitro synergy, the association CZA/colistin seems not optimal. MVB and I-R were mostly used as monotherapies. Currently, there is no definitive evidence whether combinations are more effective than monotherapies; further studies are warranted, and to date only personal opinions can be provided.