RESUMO
AIM: To describe our experience in the treatment of laryngeal dystonia (in abduction and adduction), with special emphasis given to the technical aspects (approach procedure, dosage and type of botulinum toxin type A used), as well as treatment response and possible side effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study of a sample of patients with laryngeal dystonia treated by means of transoral administration of onabotulinumtoxinA or incobotulinumtoxinA over a period of 10 years (2007-2017). Data collected include demographic and clinical variables, treatment response (based on a self-rating scale), the duration of treatment and the appearance of side effects. SAMPLE SIZE: 15 patients (11 women; mean age: 44.06 years) with laryngeal dystonia (mean time since onset of 40 months; 12 patients with dystonia in adduction) and 174 administrations (92% incobotulinumtoxinA; average dosage of 5 U in each vocal cord). The procedure took an average of 11.7 minutes to perform. Response was good in 31% of the procedures and very good in 57.5%. Side effects were recorded in 14.4% of the procedures, although always mild and transitory, with a predominance of dysphagia and dysphonia. CONCLUSION: In our experience, transoral administration of botulinum toxin type A to treat laryngeal dystonia has proved to be a simple, quick, effective and safe technique.
TITLE: Distonia laringea: nuevas formas de administracion terapeutica de toxina botulinica por via directa.Objetivo. Describir nuestra experiencia en el tratamiento de la distonia laringea (en abduccion y aduccion), destacando los aspectos tecnicos (procedimiento de abordaje, dosis y tipo de toxina botulinica de tipo A utilizada), asi como la respuesta al tratamiento y los posibles efectos adversos. Pacientes y metodos. Estudio descriptivo transversal de una muestra de pacientes con distonia laringea tratados mediante administracion transoral de onabotulinumtoxina o incobotulinumtoxina A durante un periodo de 10 años (2007-2017). Se recogen las variables demograficas y clinicas, la respuesta al tratamiento (a partir de una escala de autoevaluacion), la duracion de este y la aparicion de efectos adversos. Resultados. Tamaño muestral: 15 pacientes (11 mujeres; edad media: 44,06 años) con distonia laringea (tiempo medio de evolucion de 40 meses; 12 pacientes con distonia en aduccion) y 174 administraciones (92% incobotulinumtoxina A; dosis media de 5 U en cada cuerda vocal). La duracion media del procedimiento fue de 11,7 minutos. La respuesta fue notable en el 31% de los procedimientos y alta en el 57,5%. Se registraron efectos adversos en el 14,4% de los procedimientos, siempre de caracter leve y transitorio, con predominio de la disfagia y la disfonia. Conclusion. En nuestra experiencia, la administracion transoral de toxina botulinica de tipo A como tratamiento de la distonia laringea ha demostrado ser una tecnica sencilla, rapida, eficaz y segura.
Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administração & dosagem , Distúrbios Distônicos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças da Laringe/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Anestesia Local , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/efeitos adversos , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos de Deglutição/induzido quimicamente , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Disfonia/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais/instrumentação , Injeções Intralesionais/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prega VocalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The gold standard treatment of Old World leishmaniasis, a common tropical parasitic infestation, is intralesional meglumine antimoniate injection. Mesotherapy is a new minimally invasive method of administration of variable substances to the skin. OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effects of treatment of leishmaniasis with intralesional injection of meglumine antimoniate using conventional method and mesotherapy method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with proven leishmaniasis were recruited and randomly treated by one of the two methods, either by conventional injection or by mesotherapy administration weekly. Lesion characteristics were evaluated at every treatment session as well as 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after cessation of treatment. RESULTS: The improvement in lesions was similar in both groups, while it was noted sooner in mesotherapy group with less amount of drug usage (P = 0.005 and 0.016 respectively). Also, patients treated with mesotherapy experienced less pain severity (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Mesotherapy is a safe and effective method of meglumine antimoniate injection for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis and is less painful.
Assuntos
Leishmaniose Cutânea/tratamento farmacológico , Meglumina/administração & dosagem , Mesoterapia/instrumentação , Compostos Organometálicos/administração & dosagem , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais/instrumentação , Injeções Intralesionais/métodos , Masculino , Antimoniato de Meglumina , Dor/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Three minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of primary and secondary malignant hepatic tumors - percutaneous ethanol injection, laser-induced thermotherapy and percutaneous radiofrequency thermotherapy--are reviewed and discussed. The initial clinical results suggest that these technics are safe and potentially effective in selected patients with inoperable liver tumors.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Etanol/administração & dosagem , Hipertermia Induzida/instrumentação , Injeções Intralesionais/instrumentação , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia DopplerRESUMO
Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) is widely used as a local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, because only a small amount of ethanol can be used in one PEIT session and because the antitumor effect is limited, this modality is indicated only when there are three or fewer tumors and when the tumor diameter is < or = 3 cm. To obtain a more potent and certain antitumor effect, we have devised a new treatment called percutaneous hot ethanol injection therapy (PHEIT), and developed a Continuous Heating Device with which ethanol can be heated and locally injected at a specified temperature. The continuous Heating Device is composed of three major components: a syringe heater, a needle thermocontroller, and a needle tip thermosensor. A disposable syringe filled with liquid is inserted into the syringe heater, which heats the liquid to a desired temperature by adjusting the voltage. The needle thermocontroller is a puncture guide needle to which a heating device has been attached. The needle-tip thermosensor constantly measures, displays and records the temperature of the liquid at the needle tip during injection. Also, because the Continuous Heating Device is a closed-circuit system, there is no risk of accidental a fire, which ensures procedural safety. It is also possible to use this device to safely heat and inject a variety of other liquids, such as physiological saline and anticancer agents and thus contribute to the widespread development of ultrasound-guided injection therapy.