Identification of groups with poor cost-effectiveness of peginterferon plus ribavirin for naïve hepatitis C patients with a real-world cohort and database.

BACKGROUND: For decades, peginterferon and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) have been the standard-of-care for chronic hepatitis C virus (CHC) infection. However, the actual cost-effectiveness of this therapy remains unclear. We purposed to explore the real-world cost effectiveness for subgroups of treatment-naïve CHC patients with PegIFN/RBV therapy in a large real-world cohort using a whole population database. METHODS: A total of 1809 treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients (829 HCV genotype 1 [G1] and 980 HCV G2) treated with PegIFN/RBV therapies were linked to the National Health Insurance Research Database, covering the entire population of Taiwan from 1998 to 2013 to collect the total medical-care expenses of outpatient (antiviral agents, nonantiviral agents, laboratory, and consultation costs) and inpatient (medication, logistic, laboratory, and intervention costs) visits. The costs per treatment and the cost per sustained virological response (SVR) achieved were calculated. RESULTS: The average medical-care cost was USD $4823 (±$2984) per treatment and $6105 (±$3778) per SVR achieved. With SVR rates of 68.6% and 87.8%, the cost/SVR was significantly higher in G1 than those in G2 patients, respectively ($8285 vs $4663, P < .001). Treatment-naïve G1 patients of old ages, those with advanced fibrosis, high viral loads, or interleukin-28B unfavorable genotypes, or those without a rapid virological response (RVR: undetectable HCV RNA at week 4), or those with complete early virological response (cEVR: undetectable HCV RNA at week 12). Treatment-naïve G2 patients with high viral loads or without RVR or cEVR incurred significantly higher costs per SVR than their counterparts. The cost/SVR was extremely high among patients without RVR and in patients without cEVR. CONCLUSION: We investigated the real-world cost effectiveness data for different subgroups of treatment-naïve HCV patients with PegIFN/RBV therapies, which could provide useful, informative evidence for making decisions regarding future therapeutic strategies comprising costly direct-acting antivirals.

[The clinical economic analysis of application of immune correcting preparations to prevent respiratory infections and their complications in frequently ill children of early school age].

The article presents the results of clinical economic analysis of effect of different immune correcting preparations on rate of respiratory infections in 548 frequently ill children of early school age. It is established that preventive immune correction with lysates of bacteria or glucosaminyl muramyl dipeptide in aggregate with vitamin mineral complex results in statistically significant decreasing of rate of respiratory infections and dramatic decreasing of direct and indirect costs of treatment of infectious diseases of respiratory ways. The preventive application of juice of cone-flower herb or interferon in aggregate with vitamnin mineral complex statistically significantly decreases rate of respiratory infections and negligibly decreases direct and indirect costs of their treatment.

The effect of hepatitis C treatment response on medical costs: a longitudinal analysis in an integrated care setting.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that chronic hepatitis C patients who achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) have lower risks of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Given the substantial costs and complexity of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral treatment, post-treatment benefits are important to understand.   OBJECTIVE: To determine whether health care costs and utilization for up to 5 years after treatment differed between patients who achieved SVR and those who did not.  METHODS: Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program patients receiving HCV treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV) from 2002 to 2007 were retrospectively analyzed, excluding those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or chronic hepatitis B. Health care utilization and costs for up to 5 years after treatment completion were derived from electronic records. We compared mean annual cost and overall post-treatment costs (standardized to year-2007 dollars), and yearly utilization counts between the SVR and non-SVR groups, adjusting for pretreatment costs, age, sex, baseline cirrhosis, and race using gamma and Poisson regression models.  RESULTS: The 1,924 patients eligible for inclusion were a mean age of 50 years; 63% male; 58% white, non-Hispanic; 62% with genotype 1; and 48% who had achieved SVR. The mean duration of post-treatment time was 3 years, and patients without SVR incurred significantly higher health care costs than patients with SVR. For each post-treatment year, total adjusted costs were significantly higher in the non-SVR group than in the SVR group, with rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs ranging from 1.26 (95% CI, 1.13-1.40) to 1.64 (95% CI, 1.38-1.96), driven mostly by hospital and outpatient pharmacy costs. When all post-treatment years were considered collectively, the non-SVR group had significantly higher costs overall (RR=1.41; 95% CI, 1.17-1.69) and in each category of costs. The adjusted difference in yearly total mean costs was $2,648 (95% CI, 737-4,560). In post-treatment years 2-5, adjusted liver-specific laboratory test rates were 1.8 to 2.3 times higher in the non-SVR group than in the SVR group (each year, P less than 0.001). During post-treatment years 1-5, adjusted yearly liver-related hospitalization rates were up to 2.45 times higher (95% CI, 1.56-3.85), and medicine/GI clinic visit rates were up to 1.39 times higher (95% CI, 1.23-1.54) in the non-SVR group compared with the SVR group.  CONCLUSION: Health care utilization and costs after HCV antiviral therapy with Peg-IFN/RBV, particularly for liver-related tests, outpatient drugs, and hospitalizations, were significantly lower for patients who achieved SVR than for those without SVR. Our observations are consistent with the potentially lower risk of severe liver disease among patients with SVR. 

Chronic hepatitis B treatment: the cost-effectiveness of interferon compared to lamivudine.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation from the perspective of the Brazilian National Health System of alternatives strategies (i.e., conventional interferon, pegylated interferon, and lamivudine) for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B who present elevated aminotransferase levels and no evidence of cirrhosis at the beginning of treatment. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for chronic hepatitis B (hepatitis B antigen e [HBeAg] positive and negative) with 40 years' time horizon. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5%. Annual rates of disease progression, costs due to complications, and the efficacy of medicines were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated uncertainties. RESULTS: For HBeAg positive patients, peginterferon (48 weeks) resulted in an increase of 0.21 discounted life-years gained compared to interferon (24 weeks). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) converted to US dollars using the 2009 purchasing power parity conversion factor was US$100,752.24 per life-year gained. For HBeAg negative patients, it was observed that interferon (48 weeks) compared with long-term lamivudine presented an increase of 0.45 discounted life-years gained and ICER of US$15,766.90 per life-year gained. In the sensitivity analysis, the ICER was more sensitive to variation in the probability of transition from chronic hepatitis B to compensated cirrhosis, discount rate, and medicine prices. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for HBeAg positive (pegylated interferon vs. conventional interferon) and negative (conventional interferon vs. lamivudine) showed that conventional interferon was cost-effective until three times the gross domestic product per capita. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with chronic hepatitis B with elevated aminotransferase levels in the pretreatment and no cirrhosis who were HBeAg positive, pegylated interferon (48 weeks) provided more life-years gained when compared to conventional interferon (24 weeks), and the ICER surpasses the country's buying power, which makes conventional interferon the chosen alternative. For HBeAg negative patients, conventional interferon (48 weeks) compared to lamivudine provided more life-years gained at a favorable ICER.

Productivity improvements in hepatitis C treatment: impact on efficacy, cost, cost-effectiveness and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has advanced considerably during the past 15 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different key developments from a health-economic perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Costs and health-related quality-of-life data from a follow-up of Swedish patients treated for hepatitis C in clinical practice were used together with clinical trial data and natural history data in order to create a mathematical model that could be used to evaluate the advancement in hepatitis C therapy. The efficacy of treatment, costs and cost-effectiveness were evaluated for both current as well as proposed treatment strategies. A sensitivity analysis was used to assess how results were affected when key variables changed. RESULTS: Current genotype-guided pegylated interferon and ribavirin is a cost-effective treatment strategy. A proposed treatment strategy involving a reduction in the length of treatment for certain patient subgroups with genotypes 1, 2 and 3, as well as an increase in the length of treatment for patients with genotype 1 and slow virological response was estimated to be a cost-effective future treatment alternative. These results were insensitive to changes in costs and risks associated with chronic hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Although the costs for treatment of hepatitis C have increased significantly over the past decade, the improvements have provided the health-care system with cost-effective options in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Non-interferon-based therapy: an option for amelioration of necro-inflammation in hepatitis C patients who cannot afford interferon therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Interferon (IFN) therapy is not affordable by the majority of Egyptian patients. Our aim was to tailor an effective and inexpensive regimen that ameliorates hepatic necro-inflammatory activity among chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. METHODS: One hundred and seventy naïve CHC patients with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (>1.5-fold) and detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA by polymerase chain reaction, who cannot afford IFN-based therapy were randomly allocated either to non-interferon-based therapy (N-IFN-BT) (group I) or silymarin therapy (group II). Group I comprised 87 patients (biopsy proved chronic hepatitis in 62 patients) who were administered a daily combination of ribavirin (600-800 mg) plus amantadine (200 mg) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (500 mg) for 24 weeks. Group II comprised 83 patients who were administered Silymarin 450 mg/day for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Statistical evaluation was conducted on 82 patients from group I and 72 from group II because of the withdrawal of five and 11 patients from Groups I and II, respectively. Age, sex, social status and biochemical parameters were comparable in both groups. Normalization of ALT at the end of treatment was achieved in 58.5% and 15.3% (P<0.001), whereas end of treatment virologic response (ETVR) was achieved in 2.4% and 0% of Groups I and II, respectively. Twenty-four weeks after cessation of therapy, sustained biochemical response (SBR) was achieved in 28% and 2.8% (P<0.001), while sustained virologic response (SVR) was maintained in 2.4% and 0% of the patients in Groups I and II, respectively. In Group I, histopathological examination revealed a decreased activity index by an average score of 1.5 points among 38/62 of the rebiopsied patients. CONCLUSION: Twenty-four weeks N-IFN-BT achieved a fourfold-higher ETBR and a tenfold-higher SBR compared with silymarin therapy, which reflects an improvement of necroinflammatory activity as proven by repeat histopathology.