Life-extended glycosylated IL-2 promotes Treg induction and suppression of autoimmunity.

IL-2 is the master-regulator cytokine for T cell dependent responses and is crucial for proliferation and survival of T cells. However, IL-2-based treatments remained marginal, in part due to short half-life. Thus, we aimed to extend IL-2 half-life by flanking the IL-2 core with sequences derived from the extensively glycosylated hinge region of the NCR2 receptor. We termed this modified IL-2: "S2A". Importantly, S2A blood half-life was extended 14-fold compared to the clinical grade IL-2, Proleukin. Low doses inoculation of S2A significantly enhanced induction of Tregs (CD4+ Regulatory T cells) in vivo, as compared to Proleukin, while both S2A and Proleukin induced low levels of CD8+ T cells. In a B16 metastatic melanoma model, S2A treatment was unable to reduce the metastatic capacity of B16 melanoma, while enhancing induction and recruitment of Tregs, compared to Proleukin. Conversely, in two autoimmune models, rheumatoid arthritis and DSS-induced colitis, S2A treatment significantly reduced the progression of disease compared to Proleukin. Our results suggest new avenues for generating long-acting IL-2 for long-standing treatment and a new technique for manipulating short-life proteins for clinical and research uses.

A Phase I, Dose Escalation, Single Dose Trial of Oral Attenuated Salmonella typhimurium Containing Human IL-2 in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Salmonella has been shown to preferentially colonize solid tumors. It is known that toxicity limits the systemic administration of immunomodulatory cytokines that have a significant anticancer effect. Therefore, we tested a unique cancer treatment strategy comprised of oral delivery of Saltikva, an attenuated strain of Salmonella typhimurium that contain the human gene for interleukin-2. In preclinical experimentation, a significant antitumor effect without toxicity was observed. A dose escalation, single dose, Phase I trial was conducted. Dose escalation (10 to 10) while monitoring for dose limiting toxicity and response was performed. Flow cytometry was conducted to determine the immunologic effect. In total 22 patients were administered Saltikva. Eight patients did not complete the trial. No toxicity or adverse events were observed. There was no survival advantage. Flow cytometry demonstrated an increase in circulating natural killer (NK) cells and NK-T cells when comparing the prestudy period. The results of this phase I dose escalation study show that oral attenuated S. typhimurium containing the human interleukin-2 gene caused no significant toxicities up to doses of 10 colony forming unit. There was no evidence of partial or complete response. All patients had progressive disease and eventually succumbed to their illness. Although no survival advantage was seen in this single dose study, the statistically significant increase in circulating NK and NK-T cell demonstrates an immunologic effect from this treatment regimen and suggest that a multiple dose study should be undertaken.

Low-Frequency Sonophoresis of Chinese Medicine Formula Improves Efficacy of Malignant Pleural Effusion Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether low-frequency ultrasound-facilitated transdermal delivery of a Chinese medicine (CM) formula could improve the efficacy of intrapleural administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2) in treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: A total of 110 eligible participants were randomized into the low-frequency sonophoresis (LFS) of CM (LSF/CM) group (55 cases) and the control group (55 cases) by simple randomization using a random number table. The control group was treated with an intrapleural administration of IL-2; and the LFS/CM group was treated with LFS of a CM gel formulation, combined with the same IL-2 injection as in the control group. The CM formula consisted of Semen Lepidii, Semen Sinapis, Ramulus Cinnamomi, Poriacocos, Herba Lycopi, and Radix Paeoniae Rubra. After 2-week treatment, the therapeutic outcome was determined by the change of the amount of MPE, which was evaluated by B-scan ultrasound and/or chest X-ray, and the change of quality of life (QOL) scores, which were evaluated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. RESULTS: A significantly higher objective remission rate (ORR) was obtained with intrapleural IL-2 plus LFS/CM than IL-2 treatment alone (P=0.049). In addition, more patients in the LFS/CM group than in the control group had an improved QOL score (P=0.048), and no patients in the LFS/CM group had a reduced QOL. CONCLUSION: LFS of CM formulation could effectively alleviate MPE and improve the QOL of cancer patients.

A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes in advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Although a myriad of novel treatments entered the treatment paradigm for advanced melanoma, there is lack of head-to-head evidence. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate each treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane to identify all phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a time frame from January 1, 2010 to March 11, 2019. We retrieved evidence on treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Evidence was synthesised using a Bayesian fixed-effect NMA. Reference treatment was dacarbazine. In accordance with RCTs, dacarbazine was pooled with temozolomide, paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus carboplatin. To increase homogeneity of the study populations, RCTs were only included if patients were not previously treated with novel treatments. RESULTS: The SLR identified 28 phase III RCTs involving 14,376 patients. Nineteen and seventeen treatments were included in the effectiveness and safety NMA, respectively. For PFS, dabrafenib plus trametinib (hazard ratio [HR] PFS: 0.21) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR PFS: 0.22) were identified as most favourable treatments. Both had, however, less favourable safety profiles. Five other treatments closely followed (dabrafenib [HR PFS: 0.30], nivolumab plus ipilimumab [HR PFS: 0.34], vemurafenib [HR PFS: 0.38], nivolumab [HR PFS: 0.42] and pembrolizumab [HR PFS: 0.46]). In contrast, for OS, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR OS: 0.39), nivolumab (HR OS: 0.46) and pembrolizumab (HR OS: 0.50) were more favourable than dabrafenib plus trametinib (HR OS: 0.55) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR OS: 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Our NMA identified the most effective treatment options for advanced melanoma and provided valuable insights into each novel treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. This information may facilitate evidence-based decision-making and may support the optimisation of treatment and outcomes in everyday clinical practice.

Interleukin 2 with anti-GD2 antibody ch14.18/CHO (dinutuximab beta) in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy with the chimeric anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody dinutuximab, combined with alternating granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and intravenous interleukin-2 (IL-2), improves survival in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. We aimed to assess event-free survival after treatment with ch14.18/CHO (dinutuximab beta) and subcutaneous IL-2, compared with dinutuximab beta alone in children and young people with high-risk neuroblastoma. METHODS: We did an international, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma at 104 institutions in 12 countries. Eligible patients were aged 1-20 years and had MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma with stages 2, 3, or 4S, or stage 4 neuroblastoma of any MYCN status, according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System. Patients were eligible if they had been enrolled at diagnosis in the HR-NBL1/SIOPEN trial, had completed the multidrug induction regimen (cisplatin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and etoposide, with or without topotecan, vincristine, and doxorubicin), had achieved a disease response that fulfilled prespecified criteria, had received high-dose therapy (busulfan and melphalan or carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan) and had received radiotherapy to the primary tumour site. In this component of the trial, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive dinutuximab beta (20 mg/m2 per day as an 8 h infusion for 5 consecutive days) or dinutuximab beta plus subcutaneous IL-2 (6 × 106 IU/m2 per day on days 1-5 and days 8-12 of each cycle) with the minimisation method to balance randomisation for national groups and type of high-dose therapy. All participants received oral isotretinoin (160 mg/m2 per day for 2 weeks) before the first immunotherapy cycle and after each immunotherapy cycle, for six cycles. The primary endpoint was 3-year event-free survival, analysed by intention to treat. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704716, and EudraCT, number 2006-001489-17, and recruitment to this randomisation is closed. FINDINGS: Between Oct 22, 2009, and Aug 12, 2013, 422 patients were eligible to participate in the immunotherapy randomisation, of whom 406 (96%) were randomly assigned to a treatment group (n=200 to dinutuximab beta and n=206 to dinutuximab beta with subcutaneous IL-2). Median follow-up was 4·7 years (IQR 3·9-5·3). Because of toxicity, 117 (62%) of 188 patients assigned to dinutuximab beta and subcutaneous IL-2 received their allocated treatment, by contrast with 160 (87%) of 183 patients who received dinutuximab beta alone (p<0·0001). 3-year event-free survival was 56% (95% CI 49-63) with dinutuximab beta (83 patients had an event) and 60% (53-66) with dinutuximab beta and subcutaneous IL-2 (80 patients had an event; p=0·76). Four patients died of toxicity (n=2 in each group); one patient in each group while receiving immunotherapy (n=1 congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension due to capillary leak syndrome; n=1 infection-related acute respiratory distress syndrome), and one patient in each group after five cycles of immunotherapy (n=1 fungal infection and multi-organ failure; n=1 pulmonary fibrosis). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypersensitivity reactions (19 [10%] of 185 patients in the dinutuximab beta group vs 39 [20%] of 191 patients in the dinutuximab plus subcutaneous IL-2 group), capillary leak (five [4%] of 119 vs 19 [15%] of 125), fever (25 [14%] of 185 vs 76 [40%] of 190), infection (47 [25%] of 185 vs 64 [33%] of 191), immunotherapy-related pain (19 [16%] of 122 vs 32 [26%] of 124), and impaired general condition (30 [16%] of 185 vs 78 [41%] of 192). INTERPRETATION: There is no evidence that addition of subcutaneous IL-2 to immunotherapy with dinutuximab beta, given as an 8 h infusion, improved outcomes in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who had responded to standard induction and consolidation treatment. Subcutaneous IL-2 with dinutuximab beta was associated with greater toxicity than dinutuximab beta alone. Dinutuximab beta and isotretinoin without subcutaneous IL-2 should thus be considered the standard of care until results of ongoing randomised trials using a modified schedule of dinutuximab beta and subcutaneous IL-2 are available. FUNDING: European Commission 5th Frame Work Grant, St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le Cancer.

Developments in Intralesional Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional advanced melanoma poses a complex clinical challenge that requires a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach. Numerous agents have been studied for their suitability as intralesional therapy in the past decades, but few have successfully completed phase 3 clinical trial testing. METHODS: The relevant medical literature was searched for articles regarding use of intralesional therapies in metastatic melanoma. Therapies with data from phase 2 or higher studies were selected for review. This review also summarizes the mechanisms of action, adverse-event profiles, and clinical data for these agents. RESULTS: Intralesional therapies demonstrate promising effects in select patients with advanced melanoma. The optimal approach should be individually tailored and consist of a combination of intralesional therapies, regional perfusions, systemic immunotherapies, targeted therapies, and surgery, if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its relatively good local response rates and tolerable adverse-event profile, intralesional therapy may be a treatment option for select patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic melanoma.

100% Complete response rate in patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma treated with intralesional interleukin (IL)-2, imiquimod, and topical retinoid combination therapy: results of a case series.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cutaneous melanoma metastases have experienced excellent responses to intralesional interleukin (IL)-2. This has led to its recent inclusion into the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for management of cutaneous melanoma metastases. Despite this, intralesional IL-2 has not been highlighted in the US literature nor have US physicians adopted it. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of intralesional IL-2 combined with topical imiquimod and retinoid for treatment of cutaneous metastatic melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 11 patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma were treated with intralesional IL-2 combined with topical imiquimod and retinoid. RESULTS: A 100% complete local response rate with long-term follow-up (average of 24 months) was seen in all 11 patients treated with this proposed regimen. Biopsy specimens of treated sites confirmed absence of malignant cells. The most common treatment-related adverse event was rigors. LIMITATIONS: Small number of patients, retrospective review of charts, and lack of a comparison group were limitations. CONCLUSION: Intralesional IL-2 administered concomitantly with topical imiquimod and a retinoid cream is a promising therapeutic option for managing cutaneous melanoma metastases. The regimen was well tolerated and should be considered as a reasonable alternative to surgical excision.

Dose-finding/phase II trial: bevacizumab, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy (BIC) in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Antitumor effects and variations of circulating T regulatory cells (Treg).

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and toxicities of a combined regimen of bevacizumab plus immunotherapy and chemotherapy (BIC) and the circulating T regulatory cells (Treg) in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Nephrectomized mRCC patients were enrolled into a multicenter single-arm dose-finding study with five escalated dose levels of chemotherapy with intravenous gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil associated with fixed intravenous doses of bevacizumab, subcutaneous low doses of interleukin-2, and interferon-α-2a. An expanded cohort (phase II study) was treated at the recommended dose for additional safety and efficacy information according to minimax Simon two-stage design. Blood samples for Treg were collected and evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis on cycle 1. Fifty-one patients were entered to receive one of five dose levels. Median age was 58 years (male 67 %, pretreated 49 %): 15 patients were low risk according to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria, while 27 and nine were respectively intermediate- and high-risk patients. More frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities included nonfebrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fever. Among patients evaluable for response (49), 29.5 % had partial response and 37 % stable disease. Overall median time to progression and median overall survival were 8.8 and 22.67 months, respectively. We observed a rapid increase in the percentage of Treg after immunotherapy and a reduction after bevacizumab only in patient who obtained a partial response or stable disease. The BIC was feasible, well tolerated, and shown interesting activity. Further studies are needed to explore if Treg could have a role in clinical response in mRCC treated with bevacizumab.

Detailed protocol for administration of intralesional IL-2 for the treatment of Stage IIIc and IV M1a metastatic melanoma based on current NCCN guidelines.

Melanoma claims approximately 9,000 lives in the United States annually. Patients who present with satellite, in-transit, or distant cutaneous metastases have limited treatment options and the prognosis for patients with metastatic disease remains poor. Surgical excision remains the most common treatment modality for cutaneous metastases, but may not address concurrent subclinical in-transit metastases. Other palliative treatment options include Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and isolated limb perfusion (ILP). Although intravenous IL-2 has been used for treatment of metastatic melanoma since 1998, intralesional IL-2 has only now been included in the most recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines after case series and phase I/II clinical trials have shown promising results against Stage IIIc and IV M1a melanoma. Intralesional IL-2 protocols have varied markedly from study to study and there are no consensus guidelines available to help direct treatment. Herein, we present a detailed protocol for the administration of intralesional IL-2 that has been successfully used at two different institutions for treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases.

Retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of high-dose interleukin-2 after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the most common first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, high-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL2) remains the only agent that provides durable complete responses. The optimal sequence of these agents remains uncertain. This retrospective multi-institutional study examined the safety and efficacy of HD-IL2 following TKI therapy. After IRB approval at 7 HD-IL2 centers, data relating to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics among 40 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with HD-IL2 after at least 1 prior TKI therapy were retrospectively collected. The most common cardiac adverse events were grade 3 hypotension and vascular leak syndrome. Six patients (15%) experienced other grade ≥3 cardiac adverse events. There were 2 treatment-related deaths due to congestive heart failure, occurring in 1 patient with short TKI to HD-IL2 interval and another patient with an abnormal baseline cardiac stress test. Best responses included 2 CRs (5%, duration 40+ and 62+ mo), 3 PRs (8%, duration 6, 11, and 24 mo), 13 SD (32%, median duration 12 mo), 20 PD (50%), and 2 not evaluable patients. Median overall survival was 22 months. Administration of HD-IL2 could be safe and effective after TKI therapy; however, careful selection of patients is critical. We recommend baseline cardiac risk factor assessment, screening with both cardiac stress test and echocardiogram, and allowing a TKI to HD-IL2 interval of at least 2 months.

A Phase I/Ib study of folate immune (EC90 vaccine administered with GPI-0100 adjuvant followed by EC17) with interferon-α and interleukin-2 in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Folate immune (EC90 vaccine with GPI-0100 adjuvant followed by EC17) is a novel folate-targeted hapten immunotherapy designed to exploit the overexpression of folate receptors on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells. In this open-label, phase I/II clinical study, we report the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of folate immune with concurrent interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-α (IFN-α) in patients with recurrent or metastatic RCC. Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Following 2 phase I cohorts of 6 patients each, we extended the study to 12 additional patients: 18 received weekly vaccination of 1.2 mg of EC90 with 3.0 mg of GPI-0100 adjuvant for 4 weeks. Beginning on cycle 1, day 8, 0.3 mg/kg of EC17 was administered once daily, 5 days per week (Monday-Friday) for 4 consecutive weeks. Beginning on cycle 1, day 15, IL-2 and IFN-α were administered at doses of 12 and 3.0 MIU, respectively, after the EC17 dose, 3 times per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) for 3 weeks. In cycle 2, IL-2 and IFN-α, doses of 7.0 and 3.0 MIU, respectively, were administered 3 days per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) for 4 consecutive weeks. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Most adverse events reported were grade 1 or 2, with only twelve grade ≥3 toxicities reported. Sixteen patients had progressive disease, 7 patients were observed to have stable disease, and 1 patient achieved a partial response lasting 71 days. Overall, folate immune plus low-dose IFN-α and IL-2 was safe and well tolerated with some observed clinical activity.

A phase I study of high-dose interleukin-2 with sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and melanoma.

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) followed by sorafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Biomarkers relevant to the antitumor effects of IL-2 that may be altered by sorafenib including the percentages of natural T-regulatory cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and STAT5 phosphorylation (pSTAT5) in T cells were evaluated. We hypothesized that the proposed treatment schedule is feasible and safe and may lead to enhanced tumor response. A phase I dose escalation trial was conducted in patients with either metastatic RCC or MM. HD IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg IV q8h × 8-12 doses) was administered on days 1-5 and 15-19, followed by sorafenib on days 29-82. The sorafenib dose was escalated. The percentage of Tregs, MDSC, and pSTAT5 in T cells were evaluated in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Twelve of the 18 patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The treatment-related toxicity was predictable and did not seem to be additive with this schedule of administration. Partial responses were seen in 3 patients. No significant changes in the percentage of circulating Treg and MDSC were observed, whereas sorafenib did not adversely affect the ability of IL-2 to induce pSTAT5 in T cells. HD IL-2 followed by sorafenib was safe and feasible in patients with MM and RCC and did not adversely affect T-cell signaling through STAT5 in response to IL-2.

Adjuvant 5-flurouracil, alpha-interferon and interleukin-2 versus observation in patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a phase III randomised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (Genito-Urinary Cancers Group)/National Cancer Research Institute trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this trial was to compare adjuvant 5-flurouracil, alpha-interferon and interleukin-2 to observation in patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in terms of disease free survival, overall survival and quality of life (QoL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 8weeks post nephrectomy for RCC, without macroscopic residual disease, with stage T3b-c,T4 or any pT and pN1 or pN2 or positive microscopic margins or microscopic vascular invasion, and no metastases were randomised to receive adjuvant treatment or observation. QoL was assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQC-30). Treatment delivery and toxicity were monitored. The trial was designed to detect an increase in 3year disease free survival (DFS) from 50% on observation to 65% on treatment (hazard ratio (HR)=0.63) with 90% power and two-sided alpha=0.05. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2007, 309 patients were randomised (155 to observation; 154 to treatment). 35% did not complete the treatment, primarily due to toxicity (92% of patients experienced ⩾grade 2, 41% ⩾grade 3). Statistically significant differences between the arms in QoL parameters at 2months disappeared by 6months although there was suggestion of a persistent deficit in fatigue and physical function. Median follow-up was 7years (maximum 12.1years). 182 patients relapsed or died. DFS at 3years was 50% with observation and 61% with treatment (HR 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.12, p=0.233). 124 patients died. Overall survival (OS) at 5years was 63% with observation and 70% with treatment (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.61-1.23, p=0.428). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment is associated with significant toxicity. There is no statistically significant benefit for the regimen in terms of disease free or overall survival.

Comparison of acute toxicity and mortality after two different dosing regimens of high-dose interleukin-2 for patients with metastatic melanoma.

We compared acute toxicity, drug exposure, in-hospital mortality, and inpatient length of stay between two currently recommended dosing protocols (from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines) of high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients with metastatic melanoma who received high-dose IL-2 treatment between 2003 and 2010 were identified. Chemotherapy orders, electronic medical records, paper medical charts, and patient discharge summaries were reviewed retrospectively. We identified 13 patients who had received 600,000 units/kilogram (kg)/dose and 15 patients who had received 720,000 units/kg/dose. Patients in the 720,000 units/kg/dose group had a higher rate of grade 3 and 4 bilirubin elevations (34 vs. 12 %), weight gain (any grade, 96 vs. 89 %), and thrombocytopenia (any grade, 75 vs. 65 %). Patients receiving the higher dose also experienced more dose-limiting neurotoxicity (45 vs. 23 %), large-volume diarrhea (15 vs. 0 %), and hepatotoxicity (7 vs. 0 %). There was no in-hospital mortality during treatment in either group. The average length of stay was similar between both groups (5 days, SD = 1 for both groups), and the median cumulative IL-2 exposure was similar between both groups for the first course (10.1 vs.10.5 million units/kg) and for all courses (approximately 11-12 million units/kg). Both high-dose IL-2 protocols had comparable in-hospital mortality and cumulative IL-2 exposure. The 720,000 units/kg/dose dosing scheme did not shorten the length of stay but did lead to greater acute toxicity. Therefore, as a result, we recommend 600,000 units/kg/dose when deciding between the two regimens.

Overall survival for sorafenib plus interleukin-2 compared with sorafenib alone in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): final results of the ROSORC trial.

BACKGROUND: The ROSORC trial, a randomised, phase II trial comparing sorafenib plus interleukin (IL-2) versus sorafenib alone as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) failed to demonstrate differences in progression-free survival (PFS). Updated overall survival (OS) results are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 128 patients were randomised to receive sorafenib 400 mg twice daily plus subcutaneous IL-2 4.5 million international units (MIU) five times per week for 6 weeks every 8 weeks (arm A) or sorafenib alone (arm B). OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the two-sided log-rank test. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 58 months (interquartile range: 28-63 months), the median OS was 38 and 33 months in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.667). The 5-year OS was 26.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9-43.5) and 23.1% (95% CI 13.2-40.5) for the combination- and single-agent arm, respectively. Most of the patients who were refractory to first-line treatment were subsequently treated with different targeted agents; they had a median survival greater than expected. CONCLUSIONS: This outcome suggests a synergistic effect of the subsequent therapies following sorafenib failure. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00609401.

Tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: results of SMC NB-2004 study.

From January 2004 to December 2008, 50 consecutive patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were assigned to receive tandem HDCT (high-dose chemotherapy)/auto-SCT after nine cycles of induction chemotherapy. CEC (carboplatin + etoposide + cyclophosphamide) regimen and TM (thiotepa + melphalan)-TBI regimen (or TM regimen for stage 3 patients) were the first and second HDCT regimens. Local radiotherapy, differentiation therapy with 13-cis-retinoid acid and immunotherapy with interleukin-2 were given after tandem HDCT/auto-SCT. Of the 50 patients, 49 underwent a first HDCT/auto-SCT and 47 underwent a second HDCT/auto-SCT. The tumor relapsed or progressed in 14 patients, secondary malignancy developed in one patient and one patient died from chronic lung disease. Therefore, 34 patients remained event free with a median follow-up of 54.5 months (range, 14-94 months) from diagnosis. The probabilities of 5-year OS and EFS for all 50 patients were 77.0% (95% confidence interval (CI), 63.7-90.3) and 71.4% (95% CI, 58.7-84.1), respectively. However, all patients who remained event free for >3 years after tandem HDCT/auto-SCT experienced late adverse effects. Chemotherapeutic dose-escalation strategy using tandem HDCT/auto-SCT was very encouraging for survival. However, further studies incorporating newer treatment modalities are needed to reduce late adverse effects without jeopardizing the survival rate.

Palmitate-derivatized human IL-2: a potential anticancer immunotherapeutic of low systemic toxicity.

PURPOSE AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2) is a potent cytokine and FDA-approved anticancer drug. However, its clinical use has been limited by severe toxicity, associated primarily with systemic administration with excess protein distributing freely throughout the body. We hypothesized that rhIL-2 in alternate forms permitting more restricted localization may exert stronger antitumor efficacy and less toxicity. Here, we have tested the utility of palmitate-derivatized rhIL-2. rhIL-2 was reacted with N-hydroxysuccinimide palmitate ester. The resultant lipidated rhIL-2 (pIL-2), when mixed with cells, could spontaneously transfer from solution to cell surfaces. Next, anticancer efficacy of pIL-2 was assessed in two modalities. For adoptive T cell therapy, antitumor cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) were protein transferred ("painted") with pIL-2 and injected into mice bearing lymphoma. For in situ therapy, pIL-2 was injected intratumorally into mice bearing melanoma. Tumor growth and IL-2-associated toxicity were determined. RESULTS: In the lymphoma model, painting of the antitumor CTLs with pIL-2 markedly increased their viability and titer. In the melanoma model, intratumoral injection of pIL-2, but not rhIL-2, increased the number of activated CD8(+) T cells (IFN-γ(+)) in the spleen, reduced lung metastasis and prolonged the survival of treated mice. Moreover, while repeated intratumoral injection of rhIL-2 at an excessively high dose (10 injections of 10,000 IU/mouse) caused marked vascular leakage syndrome, the same regimen using pIL-2 caused no detectable toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Transferring spontaneously from solution to cell surfaces, pIL-2 may bypass the current limitations of rhIL-2 and, thus, serve as a more effective and tolerable anticancer drug.

Third-line sunitinib following sequential use of cytokine therapy and sorafenib in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of sunitinib as third-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: This study included a total of 35 consecutive Japanese patients with mRCC who were treated with third-line sunitinib after sequential use of cytokine therapy (interferon-α and/or interleukin-2) and sorafenib between September 2008 and December 2010. The clinical outcomes of third-line sunitinib in these patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients, 3 (8.6%), 28 (80.0%) and 4 (11.4%) were judged to have a partial response, stable disease and progressive disease, respectively, as the best response to sunitinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients following the introduction of sunitinib were 10.9 and 14.2 months, respectively. Of several factors examined, response to sorafenib and performance status appeared to be independently associated with PFS and OS, respectively, on multivariate analyses. The common grade 3-4 adverse events related to third-line sunitinib were thrombocytopenia (51.4%), neutropenia (42.9%) and hypertension (14.3%). CONCLUSION: Despite the low response rate, third-line sunitinib is well tolerated and could provide comparatively favorable prognostic outcomes in Japanese patients with mRCC after first-line cytokine therapy and second-line sorafenib; therefore, treatment with sunitinib could be one on the therapeutic options for patients with mRCC even after the failure of sequentially performed systemic therapies, such as cytokine therapy and sorafenib.

A neoadjuvant biochemotherapy approach to stage III melanoma: analysis of surgical outcomes.

AIMS: Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and adjuvant therapy are recommended for node-positive melanoma patients. We sought to analyze our institution's experience with neoadjuvant biochemotherapy in stage III patients. METHODS: Clinical information was extracted from a retrospective database on stage III melanoma patients. Eligible patients received two cycles of biochemotherapy prior to their CLND. RESULTS: There were 153 patients available for analysis. The average tumor depth was 2.5 mm. More than half of all patients presented with sentinel lymph node-positive disease. Surgical complications occurred in 23% of patients. Patients who experienced an adverse event during their neoadjuvant therapy had a worse overall survival when compared with those who did not (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that aggressive neoadjuvant treatment prior to CLND does not impact surgical complications. Our surgical outcomes are similar to the current literature when adjuvant therapy is used in stage III melanoma. The inability to tolerate neoadjuvant therapy in stage III melanoma is a negative prognostic indicator.