2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the third annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the role of cardiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, vasopressors in adults, advanced airway interventions in adults and children, targeted temperature management in children after cardiac arrest, initial oxygen concentration during resuscitation of newborns, and interventions for presyncope by first aid providers. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of the evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence to Decision Framework Highlights sections. The task forces also listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Cuff inflation-supplemented laryngoscope-guided nasal intubation: a comparison of three endotracheal tubes.

BACKGROUND: Softer endotracheal (ET) tubes are more difficult to navigate in the oropharynx than the stiffer polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes during nasotracheal intubation (NTI). Cuff inflation has been used to guide PVC tubes into the laryngeal inlet during blind NTI, but it has not been tested when performing NTI under direct laryngoscopic guidance. We assessed the role of cuff inflation in improving oropharyngeal navigation of 3 ET tubes of varying stiffness during direct laryngoscope-guided NTI. Simultaneously, we also assessed and compared the nasotracheal navigability and incidence of nasal injury with these ET tubes during cuff inflation-supplemented, laryngoscope-guided NTI. METHODS: One hundred sixty-two adults were randomized to undergo NTI with either a conventional PVC (n = 54), wire reinforced (WR; n = 54) or a silicone-tipped WR (SWR; n = 54) ET tube. Ease of insertion of these tubes was assessed during passage from nose into oropharynx, from oropharynx into laryngeal inlet aided by cuff inflation if needed, and from laryngeal inlet into trachea. Nasal morbidity was assessed by a blinded observer. RESULTS: All ET tubes could be inserted into the trachea. Seventy-one of 162 ET tubes could be inserted from the oropharynx into the laryngeal inlet without cuff inflation. Eighty-six of the remaining 91 tubes that did not enter the laryngeal inlet without cuff inflation could be inserted when using the cuff inflation technique. Thus, a total of 157 ET tubes could be inserted into the laryngeal inlet with cuff inflation (95% confidence interval of difference of proportions between total number of tubes passed [157] and those without cuff inflation [71]: 53% [45%-61%]). The remaining 5 tubes had to be inserted with the help of Magill forceps. The incidence of epistaxis was lowest with the SWR tube (difference of proportions [95% confidence interval] SWR versus PVC 27% [8%-45%]; SWR versus WR 20% [1%-38%]; WR versus PVC 7% [-12% to 26%]). CONCLUSIONS: The cuff inflation technique consistently improved the oropharyngeal insertion of the 3 ET tubes of varying stiffness during direct laryngoscope-guided NTI. Supplemented with the cuff inflation technique, the SWR ET tube seems to be better than the PVC and WR ET tubes in terms of complete nasotracheal navigability and less perioperative nasal injury.

Aclaraciones a los comentarios sobre "Evaluación y manejo de la vía aérea difícil prevista y no prevista: adopción de guías de práctica" / No disponible

No disponible

Airway interventions in the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory: a retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the incidence of airway interventions during cardiac electrophysiology laboratory procedures. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: A tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two-hundred eight adult patients undergoing cardiac electrophysiology laboratory procedures during a 2-year period, March 2006 to March 2008. The patients underwent the following procedures: supraventricular tachycardia ablation, atrial tachycardia ablation, atrial flutter ablation, premature ventricular contraction ablation, and ventricular tachycardia ablation. Patients who were intubated (in the intensive care unit or emergency department) before the ablation began, patients with ventricular assist devices or intra-aortic balloon pumps, and patients receiving inotropic support before the procedure were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The data were summarized by using the mean and standard deviation. Of the 208 patients, 186 were planned monitored anesthesia care, and 22 were planned general anesthetics. Of the monitored anesthesia care cases, 20 were converted to general anesthesia, and 54 received some type of airway intervention including oral-pharyngeal airway or nasal airway insertion. Therefore, 40% (74/186) of the non-general anesthesia cases required an airway intervention. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a significant proportion of the authors' patients undergoing cardiac electrophysiology laboratory procedures required deep sedation if not general anesthesia, although a non-general anesthetic was planned. The issue of depth of sedation has implications for patient safety, privileging, and regulatory compliance. Based on the present results, the authors believe sedation for these procedures is best given by anesthesia providers; furthermore, caregivers should be aware that these procedures are likely to require deep sedation if not general anesthesia.

Cricoid pressure: assessment of performance and effect of training in emergency department staff.

OBJECTIVES: (i) To evaluate the theoretical knowledge and practical skills of ED staff regarding the technique of cricoid pressure; (ii) to assess the efficacy of two methods of cricoid pressure training. METHODS: Theoretical knowledge of participants was assessed by a pretraining questionnaire, and practical ability was assessed using a Flinders Meditech cricoid pressure trainer. Participants then received a brief period of theoretical instruction, and were allocated to two training groups. Group A received further training with the pressure trainer. Group B was provided with reading material. Practical ability was assessed again immediately and then 4-6 weeks later. RESULTS: Seventy subjects were recruited. A total of 53% could identify the position of the cricoid cartilage, and 16% could identify the pressure required. The percentage achieving a correct position at baseline, immediately after training and after 4-6 weeks was 47%, 97% and 70% respectively in group A, compared with 61%, 86% and 74% respectively in group B, a non-significant difference between groups. The percentage achieving correct pressure at baseline, immediately after training and 4-6 weeks later was 38%, 88% and 67% respectively in group A, compared with 30%, 33% and 51% respectively in group B. The between-group difference was significant only immediately following training (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Theoretical knowledge and technique regarding cricoid pressure was poor among our ED staff. Both methods of training appeared to improve performance. The biofeedback group was more likely to apply correct pressure immediately after training. The effects of training diminished rapidly with time.

Anaesthesia-related maternal mortality.

Complications of anaesthesia leading to death in young pregnant women might be prevented if more experienced personnel could be entrusted with the job. The contribution of anaesthesia to maternal mortality in the United Kingdom is 1.7 per million pregnancies with almost similar incidence from United States. The commonest single factor responsible for anaesthesia-related death is difficult or failed intubation. A pregnant woman with a potentially difficult airway should receive aspiration prophylaxis (mechanical or pharmacological) as soon as operative delivery is anticipated. Anaesthetists should make a plan that comes into effect as soon as failure to view the larynx or to intubate the trachea becomes evident. Unsuspected difficult airway can be managed if the skill of the anaesthetists is of high standard. Pulmonary aspiration is one cause of death in obstetric anaesthesia. Regurgitation and vomiting prevention can minimise pulmonary aspiration. In regional anaesthesia, local anaesthetics toxicity is another cause of concern. This should be tackled with some safe local anaesthetics. Preventing a high spinal or epidural block involves ways to detect inadvertent injection of local anaesthetic into the cerebrospinal fluid. Postoperative care after anaesthesia in obstetric cases is very important.