Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0232508, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32369536

RESUMO

We investigate the relationship between crude oil prices and stock markets. Unlike prior studies, we use implied volatility indices and evaluate the change in the relationship between the volatility indices through a sub-period analysis. Specifically, we examine the causal relationships among the crude oil, S&P 500 index, and KOSPI 200 index volatilities by using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds and the Toda-Yamamoto Granger causality tests. In addition, a BEKK-GARCH model is employed to enhance the robustness of the causality test results. These experiments indicate that the OVX and VIX show bi-directional causality in the period that includes the shale gas revolution and no causality in the period that does not. Further, the OVX Granger causes the VKOSPI in the former period, but there is no causality between them in the latter period. Finally, we find strong unidirectional causality from the VIX to the VKOSPI in both sub-periods. These results have important implications for the analysis of portfolio risk management and for assisting energy policymakers and traders in making effective decisions and investments, respectively.


Assuntos
Investimentos em Saúde/economia , Gás Natural/economia , Petróleo/economia , Causalidade , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos , Análise Multivariada , República da Coreia , Gestão de Riscos , Incerteza , Estados Unidos
2.
JAMA ; 317(17): 1774-1784, 2017 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28464140

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Given scrutiny over financial conflicts of interest in health care, it is important to understand the types and distribution of industry-related payments to physicians. OBJECTIVE: To determine the types and distribution of industry-related payments to physicians in 2015 and the association of physician specialty and sex with receipt of payments from industry. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational, retrospective, population-based study of licensed US physicians (per National Plan & Provider Enumeration System) linked to 2015 Open Payments reports of industry payments. A total of 933 295 allopathic and osteopathic physicians. Outcomes were compared across specialties (surgery, primary care, specialists, interventionalists) and between 620 166 male (66.4%) and 313 129 female (33.6%) physicians using regression models adjusting for geographic Medicare-spending region and sole proprietorship. EXPOSURES: Physician specialty and sex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reported physician payment from industry (including nature, number, and value), categorized as general payments (including consulting fees and food and beverage), ownership interests (including stock options, partnership shares), royalty or license payments, and research payments. Associations between physician characteristics and reported receipt of payment. RESULTS: In 2015, 449 864 of 933 295 physicians (133 842 [29.8%] women), representing approximately 48% of all US physicians were reported to have received $2.4 billion in industry payments, including approximately $1.8 billion for general payments, $544 million for ownership interests, and $75 million for research payments. Compared with 47.7% of primary care physicians (205 830 of 431 819), 61.0% of surgeons (110 604 of 181 372) were reported as receiving general payments (absolute difference, 13.3%; 95% CI, 13.1-13.6; odds ratio [OR], 1.72; P < .001). Surgeons had a mean per-physician reported payment value of $6879 (95% CI, $5895-$7862) vs $2227 (95% CI, $2141-$2314) among primary care physicians (absolute difference, $4651; 95% CI, $4014-$5288). After adjusting for geographic spending region and sole proprietorship, men within each specialty had a higher odds of receiving general payments than did women: surgery, 62.5% vs 56.5% (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.26-1.31); primary care, 50.9% vs 43.0% (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.36-1.39); specialists, 36.3% vs 33.4% (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13-1.17); and interventionalists, 58.1% vs 40.7% (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.97-2.10; P < .001 for all tests). Similarly, men reportedly received more royalty or license payments than did women: surgery, 1.2% vs 0.03% (OR, 43.20; 95% CI, 25.02-74.57); primary care, 0.02% vs 0.002% (OR, 9.34; 95% CI, 4.11-21.23); specialists, 0.08% vs 0.01% (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.71-7.89); and for interventionalists, 0.13% vs 0.04% (OR, 7.98; 95% CI, 2.87-22.19; P < .001 for all tests). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: According to data from 2015 Open Payments reports, 48% of physicians were reported to have received a total of $2.4 billion in industry-related payments, primarily general payments, with a higher likelihood and higher value of payments to physicians in surgical vs primary care specialties and to male vs female physicians.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Economia Médica , Indústrias/economia , Investimentos em Saúde/economia , Medicina , Propriedade/economia , Médicos/economia , Conflito de Interesses , Feminino , Humanos , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Medicina Osteopática/economia , Medicina Osteopática/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicas/economia , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Cirurgiões/economia , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
3.
Eval Health Prof ; 34(2): 201-25, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21196430

RESUMO

The authors describe the customary tools used by health services researchers to conduct economic evaluations of health interventions. Recognizing the inherent challenges of these tools for utilization in contemporary public health practice, we recommend a practical cost-benefit analysis (PCBA) to allow public health practitioners to assess the economic merits of their existing public health programs. The PCBA estimates what health effects and corresponding medical cost avoidance would be required to support the costs associated with implementing a community-based prevention program. We apply the PCBA to evaluate a statewide evidence-based falls prevention program for seniors in Texas. We estimate a positive return on realized costs due to avoided direct and indirect medical expenses if the program averts 7 falls among 140 participants within the first year. While acknowledging the demonstrated health-related benefits of public health interventions, we provide a practical ex-post economic evaluation methodology to assess return on investment as a more simplistic yet effective alternative for public health practitioners versus contemporary analyses of health services researchers.


Assuntos
Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/economia , Investimentos em Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde , Política de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/economia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos , Modelos Estatísticos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Texas
5.
Ethn Dis ; 16(4): 938-42, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17061750

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the strategies and costs associated with recruiting both African American and White postmenopausal women into a randomized controlled trial. DESIGN: The Beneficial Effects of Soy Trial (BEST) was a randomized, controlled trial designed to determine the effects of a dietary soy supplement on lipoproteins, lipoprotein subclasses, and menopausal symptoms in African American and White postmenopausal women. The goal was to have > or = 80 African American and > or = 80 White women complete the study. RESULTS: A total of 705 postmenopausal women (381 African American, 324 White) were screened, and of those, 217 were randomized (105 African American, 112 White), and 192 (91 African American, 101 White) completed the study. Direct mailings to targeted zip codes proved the most successful recruitment strategy for recruiting African Americans (52% of African Americans recruited) and the second most effective for recruiting Whites (32% of Whites recruited). Newspaper advertisements yielded the highest number of White participants (36%) but proved less successful for recruiting African Americans (8%). Airing advertisements on the radio was the second most effective strategy for recruiting African Americans (15%), yet it was one of the least effective approaches for recruiting Whites (5%). The total cost of recruitment was dollar 49,036.25, which averaged dollar 255.40 per participant who completed the study. The three most successful strategies, direct mailings, newspaper ads, and radio ads, were the three most expensive approaches but yielded 73% of all participants who completed the study.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Seleção de Pacientes , Pós-Menopausa/etnologia , Proteínas de Soja/administração & dosagem , População Branca , Idoso , Baltimore/etnologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/efeitos dos fármacos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Suplementos Nutricionais/economia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários , Pós-Menopausa/sangue , Proteínas de Soja/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Triglicerídeos/sangue
6.
Med Decis Making ; 25(3): 321-9, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15951459

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health screening programs can be represented as a pathway of sequential processes: offering a test, obtaining consent, conducting the test, providing results, and linking to appropriate care. Using the example of HIV testing, the authors explore the optimal targeting of funds within this pathway. METHODS: The authors develop a microsimulation of HIV testing services and decompose the likelihood that an unidentified HIV-infected person will receive care into the probability of testing [P(test)] and the probability of follow-up [P(follow)] defined as returning for results and linking to care. The authors examine the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of alternative investments in these component probabilities. RESULTS: At 1% undiagnosed HIV prevalence, cost-effectiveness ratios for HIV testing cluster around $33,000/QALY (quality-adjusted life year) gained. A program with a yield of 0.16 via P(test)=0.20 and P(follow)=0.80 has a cost-effectiveness ratio of $32,900/QALY compared with $36,300/QALY for a program where P(test)=0.80 and P(follow)=0.20. Interventions that improve the probability of success in later stages in the testing pathway [P(follow)] are more cost-effective than investments devoted to earlier stages [P(test)]. CONCLUSIONS: Equivalent pathway outcomes in a screening program do not confer equal value. Limited screening resources are best targeted toward returning for results and linkage among those already identified with disease rather than offering testing to additional people.


Assuntos
Sorodiagnóstico da AIDS/estatística & dados numéricos , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Alocação de Recursos/economia , Sorodiagnóstico da AIDS/economia , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Aconselhamento/economia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Modelos Estatísticos , Prevalência , Probabilidade , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Med Interface ; 9(11): 86-9, 1996 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10162565

RESUMO

This article presents an overview of the current state of the health care industry with regard to information technologies. Three areas are outlined where investment is necessary to sufficiently confront the challenges that face the health care industry: (1) infrastructure, (2) business process reengineering, and (3) information systems.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Difusão de Inovações , Sistemas de Informação/economia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Telemedicina , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA