Silymarin (Milk Thistle) Treatment of Adults With Gambling Disorder: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the pharmacological treatment of gambling disorder are limited. Silymarin (derived from milk thistle) has antioxidant properties. The goal of the current study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of silymarin in adults with gambling disorder. METHODS: Forty-three individuals (18 [41.9%] women; mean age=49.61 [±13.1] years) with gambling disorder entered an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Dosing of silymarin ranged from 150 to 300 mg twice a day. The primary outcome measure was the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling (PG-YBOCS). Secondary outcome measures comprised the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale and measures of depression and anxiety. Outcomes were examined using mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Silymarin did not statistically differentiate from the placebo on any of the outcome measures of interest, in terms of treatment group×time interactions. There was a robust response in the placebo group (57% reduction on the PG-YBOCS), and on average there was a 56% reduction in YBOCS score for the milk thistle. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study do not support the use of silymarin/milk thistle in the treatment of gambling disorder but highlight the large placebo response seen in gambling disorder. Treatment interventions for gambling disorder need to better understand and address the placebo response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02337634.

[Topiramate in substance-related and addictive disorders]. / Le topiramate a-t-il un intérêt en addictologie ?

BACKGROUND: Drug treatments used in substance use disorders are not effective in all patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of topiramate use in the treatment of substance use disorders. INFORMATION SOURCES: Medline database from January 1966 to December 2013, Cochrane database and clinicaltrials.gov. SELECTION OF STUDIES: We used keywords topiramate, addiction, substance abuse, alcohol, tobacco, nicotine, cocaine, methamphetamine, opiate, heroin, benzodiazepine, cannabis, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, gambling. All clinical trials were included. Animal trials, laboratory tests, reviews, answers to writers, case-reports, case series and publications unrelated to the topic were excluded. Twenty-eight articles investigating the efficacy of topiramate in substance use were included. RESULTS: In alcohol-related disorder, several trials and a meta-analysis showed a reduction of days of consumption. In a single-center trial on tobacco-related disorder, topiramate was not found effective in reducing the carbon monoxide expired. In cocaine-related disorder, one single-center trial showed a reduction of days of consumption and two single-center trials have found a trend in favour of topiramate. In alcohol and cocaine co-dependency, a single-center trial found a trend in favour of topiramate. In methamphetamine-related disorder, a multicenter trial found a trend in favour of topiramate. In bulimia nervosa, two single-center trials showed a reduction in binge eating and compensatory behaviours. In binge eating disorder, several trials showed a reduction of binge eating and weight. In gambling, one single-center trial did not show any significant results. There were no randomized controlled trials found in opioid-related disorder, benzodiazepines-related disorder, and cannabis-related disorder. LIMITATIONS: Definition of abstinence and methods to assess the efficacy of topiramate differed between trials. The methodological quality of included trials was variable, especially with no double-blind procedure in eight trials. CONCLUSION: Topiramate showed interest mainly in alcoholism, binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. No definitive conclusions can be reached for other substance use disorders such as nicotine dependence, cocaine dependence, amphetamine dependence or cannabis dependence and for gambling.

Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of substance use disorders and pathological gambling.

This review summarizes our current knowledge of the pharmacological treatment of substance use disorders and pathological gambling using data mainly from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses regarding these randomized controlled trials. The review is restricted to the selection of first and second line pharmacological treatments for smoking, alcohol dependence, opioid dependence, cocaine dependence, cannabis dependence and pathological gambling. It is concluded that great progress has been made in the last three decades and that currently evidence-based pharmacological treatments are available for smoking cessation, alcohol and opioid dependence and pathological gambling. At the same time a series of existing and new pharmacological compounds are being tested in cocaine and cannabis dependence. The review concludes with a summary of additional strategies to increase the effect size of already available pharmacological interventions, including polypharmacy, combining pharmacotherapy with psychotherapy and psychosocial support, and improved patient-treatment matching.

Treatment of pathological gambling with naltrexone pharmacotherapy and brief intervention: a pilot study.

We explored the efficacy of the opiate antagonist, naltrexone, as a treatment for pathological gambling. Treatment seeking pathological gamblers (n = 39) (according to both South Oaks Gambling Screen and a screen based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) participated into our treatment study during 2009. The subjects were instructed to use 50 mg of naltrexone before gambling or when feeling craving towards gambling. The protocol contained one initial doctor visit with motivational brief intervention. During period that were free of gambling, the subjects were instructed to practice other healthy behavioral alternatives to gambling. The primary outcome measure was the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale adapted for Pathological Gambling. The other outcome measurements were the EQ-5D quality of life survey, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The average age of the subjects was 39 years; 80% were men. Highly significant (p < 0.01) decreases in reported obsessive-compulsive gambling and depressive symptoms and increases in the subjective quality of life developed in the study. These positive changes suggest that this simple, inexpensive treatment helps pathological gamblers. The role of naltrexone in the treatment effect, however, needs to be determined with a larger, placebo-controlled study.