RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis in young children may be an under-recognized cause of perineal dermatitis. The diapered infant skin is uniquely susceptible to allergic contact dermatitis because of more permeable neonatal skin, a moist environment, frequent contact with irritants and resultant skin barrier breakdown, and exposure to topical products such as diaper wipes, diaper preparations, and disposable diapers. To our knowledge, potential allergens in these products have not been thoroughly catalogued or studied. OBJECTIVE: We explore and review potential allergenic ingredients in diaper wipes, topical diaper preparations, and disposable diapers. METHOD: We analyzed 63 diaper wipes, 41 topical diaper preparations, and the 3 top selling diaper brands available from two of the largest retailers in the United States. Each potential allergen is discussed, and epidemiologic studies of rates of sensitization to potential allergens in children are also reported. CONCLUSIONS: Botanical extracts, including members of the Compositae family, were the most commonly represented potential allergen in both diaper wipes and topical preparations. Other potential allergens identified with high frequency include α-tocopherol, fragrances, propylene glycol, parabens, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, and lanolin. Frequent culprits such as formaldehyde releasers and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone were not prevalent in our analyzed products.
Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Fraldas Infantis/efeitos adversos , Períneo , Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Carbamatos/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Lanolina/efeitos adversos , Pomadas/efeitos adversos , Pomadas/química , Parabenos/efeitos adversos , Perfumes/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Propilenoglicol/efeitos adversos , Creme para a Pele/efeitos adversos , Creme para a Pele/química , alfa-Tocoferol/efeitos adversosAssuntos
Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Emolientes/administração & dosagem , Vitamina A/administração & dosagem , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Óleo de Fígado de Bacalhau/administração & dosagem , Óleo de Fígado de Bacalhau/efeitos adversos , Emolientes/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lanolina/administração & dosagem , Lanolina/efeitos adversos , Pomadas , Parabenos/administração & dosagem , Parabenos/efeitos adversos , Vitamina A/efeitos adversos , Vitamina D/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The etiology of cheilitis is often not readily apparent. We present a case series of four patients with allergic contact cheilitis (ACC) secondary to exposure to peppermint oil contained in a lip balm product. These patients developed eczematous dermatitis involving their lips and perioral skin. They were tested with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard series as well as with an expanded series of flavoring agents, sunscreens, plant and fragrance components, and their own products. The lip balm contained potential sensitizers such as propolis, lanolin, coconut oil, almond oil, peppermint oil, and vitamin E. Our patch-test results showed that peppermint oil was the most likely culprit in these patients' ACC. Peppermint oil is less commonly reported as causing ACC than are more common contactants such as balsam of Peru or nickel sulfate. However, with the widespread use of lip balms containing peppermint oil, more cases of peppermint oil-induced ACC may be expected.
Assuntos
Queilite/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Emolientes/efeitos adversos , Óleos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Bálsamos/administração & dosagem , Bálsamos/efeitos adversos , Queilite/diagnóstico , Óleo de Coco , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Eczema/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lanolina/efeitos adversos , Lanolina/análise , Masculino , Mentha piperita , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Óleos de Plantas/administração & dosagem , Óleos de Plantas/análise , Própole/efeitos adversos , Própole/análise , Vitamina E/efeitos adversos , Vitamina E/análiseAssuntos
Doenças do Prematuro/enfermagem , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Higiene da Pele/enfermagem , Dermatopatias/enfermagem , Combinação de Medicamentos , Toxidermias/diagnóstico , Toxidermias/enfermagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Lanolina/administração & dosagem , Lanolina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pomadas , Azeite de Oliva , Ácido Pantotênico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Pantotênico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Pantotênico/análogos & derivados , Óleos de Plantas/administração & dosagem , Óleos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/congênitoRESUMO
A recent epidemiologic survey in the UK revealed that 23% of women and 13.8% of men experience some sort of adverse reaction to a personal care product over the course of a year. Although most of these reactions may be due to subjective sensory irritation, various studies reveal that up to 10% of dermatologic patients who are patch tested are allergic to cosmetic products or their constituent ingredients. Causative products include deodorants and perfumes, skin care products, hair care products, and nail cosmetics. Allergic contact dermatitis mainly results from fragrance chemicals and preservatives. Recent work has suggested that additional fragrance chemicals may need to be tested in order to identify those patients 'missed' by the current fragrance mix; in particular, hydroxy-isohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HMPPC Lyral) has been singled out as an important sensitizing agent. The increased usage of natural fragrances and botanic extracts can also cause problems in their own right or through co-reactivity. The preservative methyldibromo glutaronitrile has also been recognized as an increasingly important sensitizer in Europe, which has led to the recent recommendation that it should be prohibited from 'leave-on' products until information on 'safe' consumer levels becomes available. Other emerging allergens include UV filters, tosylamide/formaldehyde resin, and nail acrylates. The diagnosis of cosmetic allergy should be confirmed with patch testing, including testing of 'whole' products, when necessary, and repeat open application tests can be used to confirm the relevance of reactions in cases of doubt.