Correlation Analysis and Comparison of Adult CE-Chirp ABR Response Threshold and Pure Tone Hearing Threshold.

OBJECTIVES: To study the application of CE-Chirp in the evaluation of hearing impairment in forensic medicine by testing the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in adults using CE-Chirp to analyze the relationship between the V-wave response threshold of CE-Chirp ABR test and the pure tone hearing threshold. METHODS: Subjects (aged 20-77 with a total of 100 ears) who underwent CE-Chirp ABR test in Changzhou De'an Hospital from January 2018 to June 2019 were selected to obtain the V-wave response threshold, and pure tone air conduction hearing threshold tests were conducted at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 kHz, respectively, to obtain pure tone listening threshold. The differences and statistical differences between the average pure tone hearing threshold and V-wave response threshold were compared in different hearing levels and different age groups. The correlation, differences and statistical differences between the two tests at each frequency were analyzed for all subjects. The linear regression equation for estimating pure tone hearing threshold for all subjects CE-Chirp ABR V-wave response threshold was established, and the feasibility of the equation was tested. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance in the CE-Chirp ABR response threshold and pure tone hearing threshold difference between different hearing level groups and different age groups (P>0.05). There was a good correlation between adult CE-Chirp ABR V-wave response threshold and pure tone hearing threshold with statistical significance (P<0.05), and linear regression analysis showed a significant linear correlation between the two (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CE-Chirp ABR V-wave response threshold can be used to evaluate subjects' pure tone hearing threshold under certain conditions, and can be used as an audiological test method for forensic hearing impairment assessment.

Acoustic reflexes: should we be paying more attention?

OBJECTIVE: The clinical audiology test battery often involves playing physically simple sounds with questionable ecological value to the listener. In this technical report, we revisit how valid this approach is using an automated, involuntary auditory response; the acoustic reflex threshold (ART). DESIGN: The ART was estimated four times in each individual in a quasi-random ordering of task conditions. The baseline condition (referred to as Neutral) measured the ART following a standard clinical practice. Three experimental conditions were then used in which a secondary task was performed whilst the reflex was measured: auditory attention, auditory distraction and visual distraction tasks. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty-eight participants (27 males) with a mean age of 23 years were tested. All participants were audiometrically healthy. RESULTS: The ART was elevated when a visual task was performed at the same time as the measurements were taken. Performing an auditory task did not affect the ART. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that simple audiometric measures widely used in the clinic, can be affected by central, non-auditory processes even in healthy, normal-hearing volunteers. The role of cognition and attention on auditory responses will become ever more important in the coming years.

Multi-channel and multi-harmonic analysis of Auditory Steady-State Response detection.

The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) is a type of auditory evoked potential (AEP) generated in the auditory system that can be automatically detected by means of objective response detectors (ORDs). ASSRs are usually registered on the scalp using electroencephalography (EEG). ORD are univariate techniques, i.e. only uses one data channel. However, techniques involving more than one channel - multi-channel objective response detectors (MORDs) - have been showing higher detection rate (DR) when compared to ORD techniques. When ASSR is evoked by amplitude stimuli, the responses could be detected by analyzing the modulation frequencies and their harmonics. Despite this, ORD techniques are traditionally applied only in its first harmonic. This approach is known as one-sample test. The q-sample tests, however, considers harmonics beyond the first. Thus, this work proposes and evaluates the use of q-sample tests using a combination of multiple EEG channels and multiple harmonics of the stimulation frequencies and compare them with traditional one-sample tests. The database used consists of EEG channels from 24 volunteers with normal auditory threshold collected following a binaural stimulation protocol by amplitude modulated (AM) tone with modulating frequencies near 80 Hz. The best q-sample MORD result showed an increase in DR of 45.25% when compared with the best one-sample ORD test. Thus, it is recommended to use multiple channels and multiple harmonics, whenever available.

Gaussian Processes for Hearing Threshold Estimation Using Auditory Brainstem Responses.

The Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) plays an important role in diagnosing and managing hearing loss, but can be challenging and time-consuming to measure. Test times are especially long when multiple ABR measurements are needed, e.g., when estimating hearing threshold at a range of frequencies. While many detection methods have been developed to reduce ABR test times, the majority were designed to detect the ABR at a single stimulus level and do not consider correlations in ABR waveforms across levels. These correlations hold valuable information, and can be exploited for more efficient hearing threshold estimation. This was achieved in the current work using a Gaussian Process (GP), i.e., a Bayesian approach for non-linear regression. The function to estimate with the GP was the ABR's amplitude across stimulus levels, from which hearing threshold was ultimately inferred. Active learning rules were also designed to automatically adjust the stimulus level and efficiently locate hearing threshold. Simulation results show test time reductions of up to  âˆ¼ 50% for the GP compared to a sequentially applied Hotelling's T2 test, which does not consider correlations across ABR waveforms. A case study was also included to briefly assess the GP approach in ABR data from an adult volunteer.

Deep Learning Models for Predicting Hearing Thresholds Based on Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to develop deep learning (DL) models for the quantitative prediction of hearing thresholds based on stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) evoked by swept tones. DESIGN: A total of 174 ears with normal hearing and 388 ears with sensorineural hearing loss were studied. SFOAEs in the 0.3 to 4.3 kHz frequency range were recorded using linearly swept tones at a rate of 2 Hz/msec, with stimulus level changing from 40 to 60 dB SPL in 10 dB steps. Four DL models were used to predict hearing thresholds at octave frequencies from 0.5 to 4 kHz. The models-a conventional convolutional neural network (CNN), a hybrid CNN-k-nearest neighbor (KNN), a hybrid CNN-support vector machine (SVM), and a hybrid CNN-random forest (RF)-were individually built for each frequency. The input to the DL models was the measured raw SFOAE amplitude spectra and their corresponding signal to noise ratio spectra. All DL models shared a CNN-based feature self-extractor. They differed in that the conventional CNN utilized a fully connected layer to make the final regression decision, whereas the hybrid CNN-KNN, CNN-SVM, and CNN-RF models were designed by replacing the last fully connected layer of CNN model with a traditional machine learning (ML) regressor, that is, KNN, SVM, and RF, respectively. The model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error and SE averaged over 20 repetitions of 5 × 5 fold nested cross-validation. The performance of the proposed DL models was compared with two types of traditional ML models. RESULTS: The proposed SFOAE-based DL models resulted in an optimal mean absolute error of 5.98, 5.22, 5.51, and 6.06 dB at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively, superior to that obtained by the traditional ML models. The produced SEs were 8.55, 7.27, 7.58, and 7.95 dB at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively. All the DL models outperformed any of the traditional ML models. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed swept-tone SFOAE-based DL models were capable of quantitatively predicting hearing thresholds with satisfactory performance. With DL techniques, the underlying relationship between SFOAEs and hearing thresholds at disparate frequencies was explored and captured, potentially improving the diagnostic value of SFOAEs.

Comparison of ASSR and frequency specificity ABR induced by NB CE-Chirp for prediction of behavioral hearing thresholds in children with conductive hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiological tests are often used to evaluate hearing loss in infants and young children with conductive hearing loss, no matter to quantify or characterize. However, there are advantages and disadvantages associated with the various electrophysiological tests that are currently available. Therefore, there is no gold standard test. This study aimed to compare the value of narrow-band (NB) CE-Chirp-induced auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) for assessing hearing thresholds in children with conductive hearing loss. We hope to identify an effective electrophysiological testing method to evaluate conductive hearing loss and provide a reference for clinical hearing assessment of infants with conductive hearing loss. SUBJECTS: and Methods: We selected 27 children (41 ears) aged 3-6 years with otitis media with effusion (OME). Within 1 day, they underwent behavioral audiometry and NB CE-Chirp-induced ASSR and ABR tests in sequence. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to compare behavioral audiometry thresholds and ASSR and ABR response thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. RESULTS: The behavioral audiometry thresholds of all children were strongly correlated with the response thresholds of the two electrophysiological tests, with correlation coefficients of 0.659, 0.605, 0.723, and 0.857 for ASSR, and 0.587, 0.684, 0.753, and 0.802 for ABR. The proportion of children with a difference of ≤10 dB between ASSR and behavioral audiometry thresholds or between ABR and behavioral audiometry thresholds was not high, especially in the low frequencies. ABR results were superior to ASSR results in terms of predicting actual hearing levels. At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, the average differences between the behavioral hearing thresholds and ASSR thresholds in the 41 ears were 5.6, 5.7, 2, and 5.6 dB, respectively. The average differences between behavioral hearing thresholds and ABR thresholds was -5.6, -1.4, -6.8, and 3.2 dB, respectively. The hearing loss configuration of the ASSR exhibited a peaked pattern, similar to behavioral audiometry, whereas the ABR exhibited an ascending pattern. The time to perform the single-ear ASSR test was 5.9 min, whereas the ABR test took 17.0 min. CONCLUSION: ASSR and ABR induced by the NB CE-Chirp correlated well with behavioral audiometry in children with conductive hearing loss. The NB CE-Chirp ASSR has advantages in terms of testing time and hearing configuration evaluation, whereas ABR has better reliability than ASSR. However, the stability of ASSR and ABR induced by the NB CE-Chirp is poor, and the thresholds obtained cannot replace behavioral audiometry in evaluating the true hearing of children with conductive hearing loss. However, ASSR and ABR can be used as auxiliary tests for cross-validation.

Reliability and Accuracy of Chirp Based Multiple Auditory Steady State Response (MSSR) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) in Children.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and accuracy of chirp-based Multiple Auditory Steady State Response (MSSR) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) in children. METHODS: The prospective clinical study was conducted at Selayang Hospital (SH) and Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM) within one year. A total of 38 children ranging from 3 to 18 years old underwent hearing evaluation using ABR tests and MSSR under sedation. The duration of both tests were then compared. RESULTS: The estimated hearing threshold of frequency specific chirp MSSR showed good correlation with ABR especially in higher frequencies such as 2000 Hz and 4000Hz with the value of cronbach alpha of 0.890, 0.933, 0.970 and 0.969 on 500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz and 4000Hz. The sensitivity of MSSR is 0.786, 0.75, 0.957 and 0.889 and specificity is 0.85, 0.882, 0.979 and 0.966 over 500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz and 4000Hz. The duration of MSSR tests were shorter than ABR tests in normal hearing children with an average of 35.3 minutes for MSSR tests and 46.4 minutes for ABR tests. This can also be seen in children with hearing loss where the average duration for MSSR tests is 40.0 minutes and 52.0 minutes for ABR tests. CONCLUSION: MSSR showed good correlation and reliability in comparison with ABR especially on higher frequencies. Hence, MSSR is a good clinical test to diagnose children with hearing loss.

Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: A Modeling Study.

While each place on the cochlea is most sensitive to a specific frequency, it will generally respond to a sufficiently high-level stimulus over a wide range of frequencies. This spread of excitation can introduce errors in clinical threshold estimation during a diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) exam. Off-frequency cochlear excitation can be mitigated through the addition of masking noise to the test stimuli, but introducing a masker increases the already long test times of the typical ABR exam. Our lab has recently developed the parallel ABR (pABR) paradigm to speed up test times by utilizing randomized stimulus timing to estimate the thresholds for multiple frequencies simultaneously. There is reason to believe parallel presentation of multiple frequencies provides masking effects and improves place specificity while decreasing test times. Here, we use two computational models of the auditory periphery to characterize the predicted effect of parallel presentation on place specificity in the auditory nerve. We additionally examine the effect of stimulus rate and level. Both models show the pABR is at least as place specific as standard methods, with an improvement in place specificity for parallel presentation (vs. serial) at high levels, especially at high stimulus rates. When simulating hearing impairment in one of the models, place specificity was also improved near threshold. Rather than a tradeoff, this improved place specificity would represent a secondary benefit to the pABR's faster test times.

A multi-channel EEG mini-cap can improve reliability for recording auditory brainstem responses in chinchillas.

BACKGROUND: Disabling hearing loss affects nearly 466 million people worldwide (World Health Organization). The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is the most common non-invasive clinical measure of evoked potentials, e.g., as an objective measure for universal newborn hearing screening. In research, the ABR is widely used for estimating hearing thresholds and cochlear synaptopathy in animal models of hearing loss. The ABR contains multiple waves representing neural activity across different peripheral auditory pathway stages, which arise within the first 10 ms after stimulus onset. Multi-channel (e.g., 32 or higher) caps provide robust measures for a wide variety of EEG applications for the study of human hearing. However, translational studies using preclinical animal models typically rely on only a few subdermal electrodes. NEW METHOD: We evaluated the feasibility of a 32-channel rodent EEG mini-cap for improving the reliability of ABR measures in chinchillas, a common model of human hearing. RESULTS: After confirming initial feasibility, a systematic experimental design tested five potential sources of variability inherent to the mini-cap methodology. We found each source of variance minimally affected mini-cap ABR waveform morphology, thresholds, and wave-1 amplitudes. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: The mini-cap methodology was statistically more robust and less variable than the conventional subdermal-needle methodology, most notably when analyzing ABR thresholds. Additionally, fewer repetitions were required to produce a robust ABR response when using the mini-cap. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the EEG mini-cap can improve translational studies of peripheral auditory evoked responses. Future work will evaluate the potential of the mini-cap to improve the reliability of more centrally evoked (e.g., cortical) EEG responses.

Dolphins reduce hearing sensitivity in anticipation of repetitive impulsive noise exposures.

The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) was continuously measured in two bottlenose dolphins during impulse noise exposures to determine whether observed head movements coincided with actual changes to auditory system sensitivity. Impulses were generated by a seismic air gun at a fixed inter-pulse interval of 10 s. ASSR amplitudes were extracted from the instantaneous electroencephalogram using coherent averaging within a sliding analysis window. A decline in ASSR amplitude was seen during the time interval between air gun impulses, followed by an elevation in ASSR amplitude immediately after each impulse. Similar patterns were not observed during control trials where air gun impulses were not generated. The results suggest that the dolphins learned the timing of the impulse noise sequences and lowered their hearing sensitivity before each impulse, presumably to lessen the auditory effects of the noise. The specific mechanisms responsible for the observed effects are at present unknown.

Which stimulus should be used for auditory brainstem response in newborns; CE-Chirp® level specific versus Click stimulus.

OBJECTIVES: Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), the electrical responses in the neuronal pathways extending from the inner ear to the auditory cortex, are evaluated with auditory stimuli. ABR analysis evaluates waves I, III and V's absolute-latencies, amplitude values, interpeak-latencies, interaural-latency differences, and morphologies. This study aims to reveal the advantages of CE-Chirp® LS stimulus and its clinical uses to increase by comparing the amplitude, latency, and interpeak-latency differences of waves I, III, and V at 80 dB nHL and wave V at 60, 40, 20 dB nHL by using click and CE-Chirp® LS stimuli. METHODS: 100 (54 boys, 46 girls) infants with normal hearing were included in the National Newborn Hearing Screening Program. With the click and CE-Chirp® LS ABR, the absolute latency and amplitude values of wave V at 20, 40, and 60 dB nHL, and the absolute-latency, interpeak-latency, and amplitude values of waves I, III, and V at 80 dB nHL are determined between stimuli and right-left ear. RESULTS: When the wave V latency and amplitudes obtained at 80, 60, 40, and 20 dB nHL levels were examined between genders, and according to the risk factor, no significant difference was found between click and CE-Chirp® LS stimuli (p > 0.05). Waves I, III, and V absolute-latency, amplitudes were compared at 80 dB nHL and wave V absolute-latency, amplitudes at 60, 40, and 20 dB nHL; the amplitudes measured with CE-Chirp® LS were significantly higher than the click stimulus (p < 0.05). When two stimuli were compared for I-III and III-V interpeak-latency values at 80 dB nHL level, no significant difference was found between the two stimuli (p > 0.05). However, the I-V interpeak-latency value was statistically significantly decreased for two stimuli, regardless of the ear (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested to increase the use of CE-Chirp® LS stimulus with better morphology and amplitude in clinics, believing that it facilitates clinicians' interpretation.

Acceptance and Benefit of Electroacoustic Stimulation in Children.

OBJECTIVE: Children with high-frequency severe-to-profound hearing loss and low-frequency residual hearing who do not derive significant benefit from hearing aids are now being considered for cochlear implantation. Previous research shows that hearing preservation is possible and may be desirable for the use of electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) in adults, but this topic remains underexplored in children. The goal of this study was to explore factors relating to hearing preservation, acceptance, and benefits of EAS for children. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Forty children (48 ears) with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone averages of 75 dB HL or less at 250 and 500 Hz (n = 48). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent cochlear implantation with a standard-length electrode. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Low-frequency audiometric thresholds, speech perception, and EAS usage were measured at initial stimulation, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Outcomes were compared between children with and without hearing preservation, and between EAS users and nonusers. RESULTS: Hearing was preserved at similar rates as adults but worse for children with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Fewer than half of children who qualified to use EAS chose to do so, citing a variety of audiologic and nonaudiologic reasons. No differences were detected in speech perception scores across the groups for words, sentences, or sentences in noise tests. CONCLUSIONS: Neither hearing preservation nor EAS use resulted in superior speech perception in children with preoperative residual hearing; rather, all children performed well after implantation.

Computational modeling of the human compound action potential.

The auditory nerve (AN) compound action potential (CAP) is an important tool for assessing auditory disorders and monitoring the health of the auditory periphery during surgical procedures. The CAP has been mathematically conceptualized as the convolution of a unit response (UR) waveform with the firing rate of a population of AN fibers. Here, an approach for predicting experimentally recorded CAPs in humans is proposed, which involves the use of human-based computational models to simulate AN activity. CAPs elicited by clicks, chirps, and amplitude-modulated carriers were simulated and compared with empirically recorded CAPs from human subjects. In addition, narrowband CAPs derived from noise-masked clicks and tone bursts were simulated. Many morphological, temporal, and spectral aspects of human CAPs were captured by the simulations for all stimuli tested. These findings support the use of model simulations of the human CAP to refine existing human-based models of the auditory periphery, aid in the design and analysis of auditory experiments, and predict the effects of hearing loss, synaptopathy, and other auditory disorders on the human CAP.

Middle Ear Muscle Reflex in Normal-Hearing Individuals with Occupational Noise Exposure.

Objectives: Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy is studied extensively in animal models. The diagnosis of synaptopathy in humans is challenging and the roles of many noninvasive measures in identifying synaptopathy are being explored. The acoustic middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR) can be considered as a vital tool since noise exposure affects the low-spontaneous rate fibers that play an important role in elicitation of MEMR. The present study aimed at measuring MEMR threshold and MEMR strength. Design: The study participants were divided into two groups. All the participants had normal-hearing thresholds. The control group consisted of 25 individuals with no occupational noise exposure whereas noise exposure group had 25 individuals who were exposed to occupational noise of 85 dBA for a minimum period of 1 year. MEMR threshold and strength was assessed for pure tones (500 Hz and 1000 Hz) and broadband noise. Results: The results showed that the MEMR threshold was similar in both the groups. MEMR strength was reduced in noise exposure group compared to control group. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that MEMR strength could be used as a sensitive measure in identifying cochlear synaptopathy with careful consideration of the stimulus characteristics.

Auditory brainstem response: Key parameters for good-quality recording.

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is widely used in ENT to investigate hearing loss. This test evaluates the response of the ascending auditory pathway, from cochlea to mesencephalon, following auditory stimulation. It provides precise analysis of waves numbered I to V according to location on the auditory pathway, in terms of amplitude, latency and inter-wave interval. Good-quality assessment requires familiarity with the parameters to be used and the factors likely to modify response. We describe the procedure for ABR examination and the recorded responses, with particular attention to factors influencing response to which the examiner must be vigilant. These factors are related to the individual (age, gender, hearing loss, body temperature, drug treatments), transducer (air or bone conduction), stimulation parameters (type, polarity, intensity, calibration, duration, cadence, number of clicks, background noise) and acquisition parameters (analysis window, scale, electrodes). We also briefly describe the clinical applications of this examination.

Envelope following responses for hearing diagnosis: Robustness and methodological considerations.

Recent studies have found that envelope following responses (EFRs) are a marker of age-related and noise- or ototoxic-induced cochlear synaptopathy (CS) in research animals. Whereas the cochlear injury can be well controlled in animal research studies, humans may have an unknown mixture of sensorineural hearing loss [SNHL; e.g., inner- or outer-hair-cell (OHC) damage or CS] that cannot be teased apart in a standard hearing evaluation. Hence, a direct translation of EFR markers of CS to a differential CS diagnosis in humans might be compromised by the influence of SNHL subtypes and differences in recording modalities between research animals and humans. To quantify the robustness of EFR markers for use in human studies, this study investigates the impact of methodological considerations related to electrode montage, stimulus characteristics, and presentation, as well as analysis method on human-recorded EFR markers. The main focus is on rectangularly modulated pure-tone stimuli to evoke the EFR based on a recent auditory modelling study that showed that the EFR was least affected by OHC damage and most sensitive to CS in this stimulus configuration. The outcomes of this study can help guide future clinical implementations of electroencephalography-based SNHL diagnostic tests.

The middle ear muscle reflex: Current and future role in assessing noise-induced cochlear damage.

The middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR) in humans is a bilateral contraction of the middle ear stapedial muscle in response to moderate-to-high intensity acoustic stimuli. Clinically, MEMR thresholds have been used for differential diagnosis of otopathologies for decades. More recently, changes in MEMR amplitude or threshold have been proposed as an assessment for noise-induced synaptopathy, a subclinical form of cochlear damage characterized by suprathreshold hearing problems that occur as a function of inner hair cell (IHC) synaptic loss, including hearing-in-noise deficits, tinnitus, and hyperacusis. In animal models, changes in wideband MEMR immittance have been correlated with noise-induced synaptopathy; however, studies in humans have shown more varied results. The discrepancies observed across studies could reflect the heterogeneity of synaptopathy in humans more than the effects of parametric differences or relative sensitivity of the measurement. Whereas the etiology and degree of synaptopathy can be carefully controlled in animal models, synaptopathy in humans likely stems from multiple etiologies and thus can vary greatly across the population. Here, we explore the evolving research evidence of the MEMR response in relation to subclinical noise-induced cochlear damage and the MEMR as an early correlate of suprathreshold deficits.

[Evolution of auditory brainstem response in 0-6 years old normal hearing children and characteristics of children with abnormal acoustic conduction].

Objective:To explore the normal reference range of Click-ABR latency and interwave period in 0-6 years old children, and to analyze the clinical characteristics of Click-ABR in children with sound transmission function is abnormal. Methods:A total of 1791（3582 ears） normal hearing children aged 0-6 years and 176（258 ears） conductive hearing loss children were selected for Click-ABR. The differences of Click-ABR parameters in children of different months were analyzed, and the correlation between the degree of conductive hearing loss and Click-ABR parameters was explored. Results:The incubation period of wave Ⅰ was not correlated with the age of month, while the incubation period of wave Ⅲ, wave Ⅴ, waveⅠ-Ⅲ and wave Ⅰ-Ⅴ were highly correlated with the age of month. There was a positive correlation between the latency of wave Ⅰ and hearing threshold in the children with sound transmission function is abnormal under 80 dB nHL stimulation, and there was no difference between the standard values of wave Ⅰ-Ⅲ and Ⅰ-Ⅴ in the children with sound transmission function is abnormal and normal children. Conclusion:The latency of ABR wave Ⅲ and Ⅴ, and the interval between wave Ⅰ-Ⅲ and Ⅰ-Ⅴ shorten with the increase of age in children aged 0-6 years. The normal ABR values of children of different ages should be established in each hearing clinic for children as a reference. Combined with Click-ABR threshold and 80 dB nHL acoustic subwave Ⅰlatency, the abnormal conduction function can be preliminatively screened out, which should be further supplemented with other combinations of hearing diagnosis.

Evaluation of auditory pathway excitability using a pre-operative trans-tympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response under local anesthesia in cochlear implant candidates.

OBJECTIVE: Subjective promontory stimulation is used to evaluate cochlear implant (CI) candidacy, but the test reliability is low. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) can verify the function of the auditory system objectively. This study's procedure uses a trans-tympanic rounded bent-tip electrode to perform pre-operative EABR under local anaesthesia (LA-TT-EABR) using MED-EL Software and Hardware. This study aimed to determine usability and effectiveness for CI candidates. DESIGN: We hypothesised that LA-TT-EABR waveforms of good quality would be related to successful hearing outcomes. We assumed that the duration of hearing loss/deafness was a confounding factor to study outcomes. STUDY SAMPLE: 19 borderline CI candidates. RESULTS: Positive LA-TT-EABR results were confirmed in 14 patients. LA-TT-EABR's mean latency was 2.05 ± 0.31 ms (eII/eIII) and 4.24 ± 0.39 ms (eIV/eV). Latencies weren't statistically different from intra-operative EABR elicited by basal CI contacts. All positive LA-TT-EABR patients benefitted from CI and speech performance improved one year after implantation. One patient with negative LA-TT-EABR was cochlear-implanted and had no hearing sensation. CONCLUSIONS: LA-TT-EABR is a tool in the frame of pre-operative objective testing the auditory pathway. It seems useful for clinical testing CI candidacy. Based on this study's outcomes, LA-TT-EABR should be recommended for uncertain CI candidates.

Auditory disturbances in patients with complex regional pain syndrome.

ABSTRACT: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is often associated with reduced sound tolerance (hyperacusis) on the affected side, but the mechanism of this symptom is unclear. As compensatory increases in central auditory activity after cochlear injury may trigger hyperacusis, hearing and discomfort thresholds to pure tones (250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz) were assessed in 34 patients with CRPS and 26 pain-free controls. In addition, in 31 patients and 17 controls, auditory-evoked potentials to click stimuli (0.08 ms duration, 6 Hz, 60 dB above the hearing threshold) were averaged across 2000 trials for each ear. Auditory discomfort thresholds were lower at several pitches on the CRPS-affected than contralateral side and lower at all pitches on the affected side than in controls. However, ipsilateral hyperacusis was not associated with psychophysical or physiological signs of cochlear damage. Instead, neural activity in the ipsilateral brainstem and midbrain was greater when repetitive click stimuli were presented on the affected than contralateral side and greater bilaterally than in controls. In addition, click-evoked potentials, reflecting thalamo-cortical signal transfer and early cortical processing, were greater contralaterally in patients than controls. Together, these findings suggest that hyperacusis originates in the ipsilateral brainstem and midbrain rather than the peripheral auditory apparatus of patients with CRPS. Failure of processes that jointly modulate afferent auditory signalling and pain (eg, inhibitory influences stemming from the locus coeruleus) could contribute to ipsilateral hyperacusis in CRPS.