Psychological Changes During Inpatient Conservative Treatment for Lymphedema.

Background: Learning self-care for lymphedema is essential for patients to maintain their quality of life; however, it is sometimes difficult and stressful. There are only few studies about the psychological changes in patients hospitalized for conservative therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychological changes in patients admitted for conservative therapy and training in self-care for lymphedema. Methods and Results: Nine patients who were hospitalized for conservative treatment of lymphedema of the lower limbs were administered the Profile of Moods States questionnaire twice: day of admission or the following day and after 5 days of hospital stay. Eight female patients and one male patient were included in this retrospective study. The mean age was 67.2 years. We provided standard compression therapy, manual lymph drainage, and exercise therapy to the patients. The Profile of Moods States 2nd edition, Japanese version of the Profile of Moods States, was used as an evaluation method of the psychological state. The results of the psychological tests were evaluated by a certified public psychologist. The scores for negative mood (anger or hostility, confusion or bewilderment, depression or rejection, fatigue or inertia, and tension and anxiety) were all lower on the fifth day of hospitalization compared with those at admission. In particular, the tension or anxiety scores decreased significantly (p = 0.019). However, the vigor or activity scores tended to increase. Conclusions: It was found that inpatient conservative therapy for lymphedema had a positive effect on the psychological state of the patients. Despite stressors such as a change in environment and introduction of new treatments (compression therapy and exercise therapy), the improvement in edema helped elevate the mood of the patients by the fifth day of hospitalization.

Application of Complete Decongestive Therapy in Patients with Secondary Bilateral Lower Limb Lymphedema after Comprehensive Treatment of Gynecological Malignant Tumor.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of complete decongestive therapy (CDT), based on fluoroscopy-guided manual lymph drainage (FG-MLD), combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) on patients with secondary bilateral lower limb lymphedema after comprehensive treatment for gynecological malignant tumors. Methods: After comprehensive treatment for gynecological malignant tumors, 18 patients suffering from bilateral lower limb lymphedema were evaluated and treated by specialist nurses (with the qualification of lymphedema therapists). The treatment course included manual drainage, IPC, bandaging, functional exercise, and skincare etc., which are performed once a day for a total of 18 times. Results: After performing the treatment 18 times, a significant reduction is observed in the patient's bilateral lower limb circumference, extracellular water (ECW) content, and lower limb segment ECW ratio. Moreover, the 50-kHz bioelectrical impedance and quality of life (QoL) scores are found to be significantly higher than before treatment (all p < 0.05). Subjective symptoms also improve significantly (p < 0.05), except for local swelling (p = 0.289 > 0.05). Conclusions: CDT based on FG-MLD, combined with IPC, effectively relieves secondary bilateral lower limb lymphedema after comprehensive treatment of gynecological malignant tumors. It also improves subjective symptoms and patients' QoL, thus deserving clinical reference and promotion.

Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage and intermittent pneumatic compression in lymphedema maintenance therapy.

Background: To compare the effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and/or manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) associated to compression stockings in the maintenance treatment of lymphedema. Patients and methods: Patients in the maintenance phase of lymphedema therapy with MLD and compression since more than a year with stable values for weight and circumferences of ankle and calf were asked to participate in a study: Compression had to be worn daily, (1) 4 weeks IPC+MLD, (2) 4 weeks MLD alone, (3) 4 Weeks IPC alone (Order 1 and 3 was randomized). At the beginning and after each 4 weeks, circumference measurements (by hand and by machine: BT600®, Bauerfeind) were documented, pain and discomfort were assessed, and quality-of-life questionnaires were completed. Results: Of 20 participants, 18 (14 female, 4 male), mean age 59.6 years (48-89) could be evaluated. 11 subjects had bilateral, 7 unilateral, 5 primary, 13 secondary lymphedema since 2-20 years (mean 7.7), the subjects had received MLD and compression for 2-14 years (mean 6.4), 1-3 times per week (mean 1.5). The BMI ranged between 21 and 47 (mean 33.7). No differences between any phases were found for: Calf and thigh volume, circumference of calf. Only the ankle circumference was significant less (-0.22 cm) when using "both" (IPC+MLD). Compared to before the study, quality of life was better in all three phases, but with a significantly higher improvement in the phases with IPC than in the phases without. Conclusions: There were no differences in objective measurement between MLD alone, IPC alone or both, excepting the minimal significant difference in ankle circumference after IPC+MLD. QOL favored IPC application. Considering the economic consequences of these results, a change of maintenance therapy with MLD weekly over years in favor of permanent care with IPC and few appointments of MLD per year should be considered and further investigated.

Managing the Morbidity: Individualizing Risk Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options for Upper Extremity Lymphedema.

In the setting where breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) remains a feared and common complication of breast cancer, here we review important factors for the development, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of BCRL. We find that race/ethnicity affect BCRL development risk, that future studies should focus on understanding the biological reasons behind the increased susceptibility of certain racial minorities to BCRL, that surveillance, early detection, exercise programs, and arm compression can reduce the risk of BCRL, and that surgical techniques to preserve and restore lymphatic drainage being evaluated in randomized trials may become transformative in reducing BCRL risk for high-risk patients.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Post-Prostatectomy Lymphedema: What's New?

Lymphedema is a chronic progressive disorder that significantly compromises patients' quality of life. In Western countries, it often results from cancer treatment, as in the case of post-radical prostatectomy lymphedema, where it can affect up to 20% of patients, with a significant disease burden. Traditionally, diagnosis, assessment of severity, and management of disease have relied on clinical assessment. In this landscape, physical and conservative treatments, including bandages and lymphatic drainage have shown limited results. Recent advances in imaging technology are revolutionizing the approach to this disorder: magnetic resonance imaging has shown satisfactory results in differential diagnosis, quantitative classification of severity, and most appropriate treatment planning. Further innovations in microsurgical techniques, based on the use of indocyanine green to map lymphatic vessels during surgery, have improved the efficacy of secondary LE treatment and led to the development of new surgical approaches. Physiologic surgical interventions, including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), are going to face widespread diffusion. A combined approach to microsurgical treatment provides the best results: LVA is effective in promoting lymphatic drainage, bridging VLNT delayed lymphangiogenic and immunological effects in the lymphatic impairment site. Simultaneous VLNT and LVA are safe and effective for patients with both early and advanced stages of post-prostatectomy LE. A new perspective is now represented by the combination of microsurgical treatments with the positioning of nano fibrillar collagen scaffolds (BioBridgeTM) to favor restoring the lymphatic function, allowing for improved and sustained volume reduction. In this narrative review, we proposed an overview of new strategies for diagnosing and treating post-prostatectomy lymphedema to get the most appropriate and successful patient treatment with an overview of the main artificial intelligence applications in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of lymphedema.

Effectiveness of Mobiderm Autofit in the Intensive Phase of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Treatment: A Case Series.

Background: The objective of this case series was to evaluate the effectiveness of wearing Mobiderm® Autofit compressive garment as part of the complete decongestive therapy (CDT) of upper limb lymphedema. Materials and Methods: Ten women and men with stage II breast cancer-related lymphedema underwent a CDT intensive phase for 12 days, combining Mobiderm Autofit compression garment with manual lymphatic drainage. Arm volume was calculated with the truncated cone formula using circumferential measurements taken at each appointment. The pressure under the garment and the overall satisfaction of patients and physicians were also assessed. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of the patients was 60.50 (11.70) years. The mean (SD) lymphedema excess volume decrease was 343.11 (266.14) mL, which represents a 36.68% decrease between day 1 and day 12, whereas the mean (SD) absolute volume difference was 420.03 (251.27) mL corresponding to a 10.12% decrease during this same period. The mean (SD) device pressure by using the PicoPress® was 30.01 (0.45) mmHg. The majority of patients were satisfied with the ease of use and the comfort of wearing Mobiderm Autofit. Such positive assessment was confirmed by the physicians. During this case series, no adverse event was reported. Conclusion: A lymphedema volume decrease of the upper limb was reported after 12 days of treatment with Mobiderm Autofit during the CDT intensive phase. Moreover, the device was well tolerated, and its use was appreciated by the patients and the physicians.

Advances in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a lifelong risk for breast cancer survivors and once acquired becomes a lifelong burden. This review summarizes current BCRL prevention and treatment strategies. FINDINGS: Risk factors for BCRL have been extensively studied and their identification has affected breast cancer treatment practice, with sentinel lymph node removal now standard of care for patients with early stage breast cancer without sentinel lymph node metastases. Early surveillance and timely management aim to reduce BCRL incidence and progression, and are further facilitated by patient education, which many breast cancer survivors report not having adequately received. Surgical approaches to BCRL prevention include axillary reverse mapping, lymphatic microsurgical preventative healing (LYMPHA) and Simplified LYMPHA (SLYMPHA). Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) remains the standard of care for patients with BCRL. Among CDT components, facilitating manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) using indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography has been proposed. Intermittent pneumatic compression, nonpneumatic active compression devices, and low-level laser therapy appear promising in lymphedema management. Reconstructive microsurgical techniques such as lymphovenous anastomosis and vascular lymph node transfer are growing surgical considerations for patients as well as liposuction-based procedures for addressing fatty fibrosis formation from chronic lymphedema. Long-term self-management adherence remains problematic, and lack of diagnosis and measurement consensus precludes a comparison of outcomes. Currently, no pharmacological approaches have proven successful. CONCLUSION: Progress in prevention and treatment of BCRL continues, requiring advances in early diagnosis, patient education, expert consensus and novel treatments designed for lymphatic rehabilitation following insults.

Acute Effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage and Compression with Exercise Therapy on Breast Lymphedema Following Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy.

Background: Breast lymphedema is a common complication of breast cancer treatments but there are limited studies about the treatment of breast lymphedema. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), compression with exercise on the local tissue water percentage, pain, and stiffness following breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients (52.54 ± 12.18 years, 28.55 ± 5.11 kg/m2) were included. The sociodemographic and clinical information was recorded. The pain and stiffness severity were measured with Visual Analog Scale. Measurements of water percentages in local tissue were performed in all quadrants of the breast with the Moisture Meter D Compact device. All measurements were performed baseline, after MLD, and after compression with exercise. Results: There was a significant difference in local tissue water percentages between the affected and unaffected sides before treatment. The percentage of water only in the lower outer quadrant of the affected breast increased significantly after acute treatment (p: 0.002). In addition, pain (p: 0.001) and stiffness (p: 0.001) scores decreased. Conclusions: Local tissue water percentages increased with MLD and decreased with compression with exercise. In the treatment of breast lymphedema, MLD and compression bandage with exercise may be beneficial in the management of the symptoms of swelling, pain, and stiffness.

Guidelines Relevant to Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management of Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.

Significance: Lymphedema is a common, distressing and debilitating condition with various etiologies. Effective diagnosis, assessment, and management rely on evidence-based clinical practice guidelines ("guidelines"). This study aims to describe and compare international guidelines on lymphedema diagnosis, assessment, and management. Recent Advances: The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Systematic searches of electronic literature databases and the web were completed in December 2020 for lymphedema guidelines published in English since 2000. Quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE)-II reporting checklist. Synthesis took a narrative approach to compare guideline recommendations and associated levels of evidence. Critical Issues: This systematic review of 1,564 articles and 159 web pages yielded 14 guidelines. All guidelines were from high-income countries. Ten focused exclusively on lymphedema, and four on cancer. Most (n = 13) guidelines recommended an integrated medical, psychological assessment, and physical examination, with a limb volume measurement of >10% in the affected limb compared, confirming a lymphedema diagnosis. Recommended management involved Complex Decongestive Therapy (CDT) followed by self-management using skincare, self-lymphatic drainage massage, exercise, and compression. Future Directions: The underlying etiology of lymphedema appeared to make little difference to guideline recommendations regarding care. High-quality guidelines are available to guide lymphedema care. However, their suitability for low-resource settings is unclear.

Water-based exercise for upper and lower limb lymphedema treatment.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is a debilitating illness caused by insufficient lymph drainage, which can have serious physical and psychological consequences. Although water-based exercise can be useful, at present, little evidence is available regarding the outcomes of aquatic treatment for patients with lymphedema. Therefore, the aim of the present scoping review was to evaluate, from reported studies, the effects of water-based exercise on pain, limb motor function, quality of life (QoL), and limb volume among patients affected by primary and secondary upper and lower limb lymphedema. METHODS: We performed a scoping review to examine clinical studies and randomized controlled trials reported in English from 2000 to 2021 by screening the MEDLINE (PubMed) and PEDro databases. RESULTS: The search produced a total of 88 studies. Eight randomized controlled trials and one clinical study of patients with primary or secondary lymphedema of upper or lower limbs who had undergone water-based treatment were included in the present study. Most trials had focused on breast cancer-related lymphedema. The shoulder range of flexion, external rotation, and abduction have been shown to improve after performing a water-based exercise protocol. Some evidence has also demonstrated that the lymphedematous limb strength can improve. Moreover, water-based exercise seemed to improve pain perception and QoL for patients with upper or lower limb lymphedema. In contrast, in the control groups, the QoL showed a tendency to worsen over time. Although some studies had not reported beneficial effects on the lymphedematous limb volume, most of the studies examined had reported a reduction in volume, especially in the short term. No adverse events were reported in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from the present review have shown the potential for aquatic exercise in lymphedema management. However, at the same time, the findings underline the multiple limitations resulting from the heterogeneity in the study populations and related physical activity protocols. The role of aquatic exercise in the conservative treatment of lymphedema requires further investigation in the future to define specific protocols of application.

Iatrogenic systemic lymphedema following multiple myeloma treatment.

Lymphedema is a debilitating disease characterized by abnormal lymphatic drainage, either due to primary maldevelopment of the lymphatic system or to secondary injury. The clinical features of primary and secondary lymphedema differ, with primary lymphedema more often involving progressive bilateral lower extremity disease as compared to secondary lymphedema characteristically having more localized symptoms related to the origin of injury. This case presentation describes a patient who presented with bilateral lower extremity swelling, left greater than the right, with imaging results to support the diagnosis of lymphedema. During the time he was followed in our clinic, our team witnessed rapid progression of his lymphedema despite compliance with conservative management. We believe that the primary mechanism of systemic damage to our patient's lymphatic system is the lenalidomide and bortezomib therapy prescribed to treat multiple myeloma. This review explores the relationship between lenalidomide, bortezomib, and lymphedema in efforts of understanding this unique pathology of iatrogenic lymphedema mimicking primary nature.

Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Strategies for Upper and Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Comprehensive Review.

Lymphedema is a chronic disabling condition affecting a growing number of patients worldwide. Although lymphedema is not life-threatening, several reports underlined detrimental consequences in terms of distress, pain, functional impairment, and infections with a relevant decrease in quality of life. Currently, there is no cure, and the therapeutic management of this condition aims at slowing down the disease progression and preventing secondary complications. Early diagnosis is paramount to enhance the effects of rehabilitation or surgical treatments. On the other hand, a multidisciplinary treatment should be truly integrated, the combination of microsurgical and reductive procedures should be considered a valid strategy to manage extremity lymphedema, and rehabilitation should be considered the cornerstone of the multidisciplinary treatment not only for patients not suitable for surgical interventions but also before and after surgical procedures. Therefore, a specialized management of Plastic Reconstructive Surgeons and Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine physicians should be mandatory to address patients' needs and optimize the treatment of this disabling and detrimental condition. Therefore, the aim of this review was to characterize the comprehensive management of lymphedema, providing a broad overview of the potential therapy available in the current literature to optimize the comprehensive management of lymphedema and minimize complications.

The American Venous Forum, American Vein and Lymphatic Society and the Society for Vascular Medicine expert opinion consensus on lymphedema diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema imposes a significant economic and social burden in modern societies. Controversies about its risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment permeate the literature. The goal of this study was to assess experts' opinions on the available literature on lymphedema while following the Delphi methodology. METHODS: In December of 2019, the American Venous Forum created a working group tasked to develop a consensus statement regarding current practices for the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema. A panel of experts was identified by the working group. The working group then compiled a list of clinical questions, risk factors, diagnosis and evaluation, and treatment of lymphedema. Fifteen questions that met the criteria for consensus were included in the list. Using a modified Delphi methodology, six questions that received between 60% and 80% of the votes were included in the list for the second round of analysis. Consensus was reached whenever >70% agreement was achieved. RESULTS: The panel of experts reached consensus that cancer, infection, chronic venous disease, and surgery are risk factors for secondary lymphedema. Consensus was also reached that clinical examination is adequate for diagnosing lymphedema and that all patients with chronic venous insufficiency (C3-C6) should be treated as lymphedema patients. No consensus was reached regarding routine clinical practice use of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy as a mandatory diagnostic tool. However, the panel came to consensus regarding the importance of quantifying edema in all patients (93.6% in favor). In terms of treatment, consensus was reached favoring the regular use of compression garments to reduce lymphedema progression (89.4% in favor, 10.6% against; mean score of 79), but the use of Velcro devices as the first line of compression therapy did not reach consensus (59.6% in favor vs 40.4% against; total score of 15). There was agreement that sequential pneumatic compression should be considered as adjuvant therapy in the maintenance phase of treatment (91.5% in favor vs. 8.5% against; mean score of 85), but less so in its initial phases (61.7% in favor vs. 38.3% against; mean score of 27). Most of the panel agreed that manual lymphatic drainage should be a mandatory treatment modality (70.2% in favor), but the panel was split in half regarding the proposal that reductive surgery should be considered for patients with failed conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: This consensus process demonstrated that lymphedema experts agree on the majority of the statements related to risk factors for lymphedema, and the diagnostic workup for lymphedema patients. Less agreement was demonstrated on statements related to treatment of lymphedema. This consensus suggests that variability in lymphedema care is high even among the experts. Developers of future practice guidelines for lymphedema should consider this information, especially in cases of low-level evidence that supports practice patterns with which the majority of experts disagree.

Manual Lymph Drainage With Progressive Arm Exercises for Axillary Web Syndrome After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a physical therapist-designed program tailored to axillary web syndrome (AWS) in women after breast cancer surgery. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Physiotherapy in Women's Health Research Unit of the Alcalá University (Madrid, Spain). Ninety-six women with AWS were assigned to the physical therapy group (manual lymph drainage [MLD] using resorption strokes and arm exercises as if performing median nerve neurodynamic glide exercises with no neural loading; n = 48) or the control group (standard arm exercises; n = 48), with both groups receiving treatment 3 times a week for 3 weeks. Both interventions included an educational component. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the physical therapy group showed significant and clinically relevant improvements in the primary outcome (self-reported pain intensity) at the primary and 3-month follow-ups. Significant and clinically relevant differences between groups were also found in the secondary outcomes (shoulder active range of motion, shoulder disability, and physical and functional aspects of health-related quality of life) at the primary follow-up and in the secondary outcomes as well as the trial outcome index at the 3-month follow-up. No significant differences were found at the 6-month follow-up in either primary or secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The physical therapy program tailored to AWS was found to be effective for AWS symptoms in women after breast cancer surgery, both immediately after the program and after 3 months. IMPACT: To our knowledge, this is the first appropriately designed study to demonstrate the effectiveness of MLD with progressive arm exercises for AWS. Clinicians and health service providers should consider how to provide survivors of breast cancer with AWS the opportunity to participate in physical therapy programs, including MLD with progressive arm exercises. LAY SUMMARY: For axillary web syndrome following breast cancer surgery, a physical therapist can design a treatment program including manual lymph drainage and progressive arm exercises, which has been shown to result in reduced pain and improved motion compared with standard arm exercises.

Adding Pneumatic Compression Therapy in Lower Extremity Lymphedema Increases Compliance of Treatment, While Decreasing the Infection Rate.

Background: Lymphedema (LE) is a chronic condition that requires lifelong treatment. Although pneumatic compression therapy (PCT) is one treatment option, current algorithms consider it as an adjunct to standard LE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the importance of adapting PCT for lower extremity LE (LEL) in relation to patient compliance and rate of infection. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with LEL were followed prospectively. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment modality, compliance, infection due to LE, and hospitalization were recorded. LEL patients with no-PCT were also recorded in the same time period to evaluate the treatment compliance and the need for physical therapy visits. The no-PCT group received the standard LE care, whereas the PCT group received the standard LE care plus a new-generation pneumatic compression device. Results: A total of 69 patients were enrolled in this study. The PCT group had 50 patients and no-PCT group had 19 patients. The PCT group had median 58.5 months of LE symptoms, while non-PCT patients had median 23 months of LE symptoms (p = 0.11). Infection rates decreased by 32% and hospitalizations due to infection decreased by 14% after PCT treatment had been initiated. Physical therapy needs decreased by 24% after PCT use. At median 18 months, follow-up compliance for PCT was 84%, but compliance for manual lymphatic drainage was almost half (53%) in no-PCT group. Conclusions: PCT leads to a decrease in infection rate, hospital admissions, and physical therapy (PT) visits in clinically significant LEL. Although there is no cost calculation in this study, it can be correlated to significant cost savings due to a reduction of infection and hospitalization and the need for PT visits. Adoption of PCT offers a superior value proposition to not only patients but also the health care system. Cost analysis should be followed.

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Wearable Compression Technology in the Treatment of Lymphedema, an Open-Label Controlled Study.

A diagnosis of lymphedema comes with a lifetime requirement for careful self-care and treatment to control skin deterioration and the consequences of excessive fluid and protein buildup leading to abnormal limb volume and an increased risk of infection. The burden of care and psychosocial aspects of physical disfiguration and loss of function are associated with compromised quality of life (QoL). The current standard therapeutic intervention is complex decongestive therapy with manual lymph drainage and frequent wearing of compression garments. With insurance limitations on therapy visits and the time and travel required, additional home treatment options are needed. Pneumatic compression pumps that mimic the manual massage pressure and pattern are sometimes prescribed, but these are bulky, difficult to apply, and require immobility during treatment. An open-label pilot study in 40 subjects was performed to evaluate the QoL and limb volume maintenance efficacy of a novel wearable compression system (Dayspring™) that is low profile, easy to use, and allows for mobility during treatment. After 28 days of use, subjects had a statistically significant 18% (p < 0.001) improvement in overall QoL as measured by the Lymphedema Quality-of-Life Questionnaire compared with baseline. Individual QoL domains, and limb volume improved with therapy. Adherence was 98% over the course of the study. Results of the clinical evaluation suggest the Dayspring wearable compression device is safe and effective and improves QoL and limb volume. The novel, low-profile device is easy to use and allows for mobility during treatment, addressing a potential barrier to adherence with pneumatic compression devices.

Long-Term Effectiveness of Combined Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Plus Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Postmastectomy Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Upper limb lymphedema may be revealed after breast cancer and its treatment. Among different treatment approaches, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) therapy and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) are reported as effective modalities in the treatment of postmastectomy upper limb lymphedema (PML). The aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term effectiveness of combined IPC plus LLLT versus IPC therapy alone in patients with PML. Methods and Results: The patients were allocated into two groups in this single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Group I received combined treatment with IPC plus LLLT (n = 21) and group II received only IPC (n = 21). IPC treatment was given 5 sessions per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions). LLLT was also performed 5 sessions per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions). Clinical evaluations were performed before and after the treatment at the 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up visits. According to within-group analysis, statistically significant improvements in the circumference difference (Cdiff) and grip strength were observed in both groups (for Cdiff, p = 0.018 and p = 0.032, respectively; for grip strength, p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). Visual analog scale values for arm pain and shoulder pain during motion were decreased only in group I. Conclusion: Both interventions have positive effects on lymphedema, grip strength, and pain. Long-term effects of combined therapy, especially on pain, are slightly superior to the pneumatic compression alone.

Far Infrared Radiation Therapy for Gynecological Cancer-Related Lymphedema Is an Effective and Oncologically Safe Treatment: A Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Background: Gynecological cancer-related lymphedema (GCRL) is a devastating condition that adversely influences function, health, and quality of life. We conducted a randomized-controlled clinical study as well as in vitro experiments to investigate the efficacy and safety of far infrared radiation (FIR) to treat lymphedema in patients having previously undergone surgery for gynecological tumors. Materials and Methods: Seventy-four women with GCRL, cancer free for 5 years or more, were randomly allocated into two treatment groups: standard of care with bandage treatment and treatment with FIR plus bandage. Variations of fluid, circumference of lymphedematous limbs, serum tumor markers (cancer antigen 125 [CA125]), inguinal-pelvic lymph nodes, vagina, lungs, and adverse reactions were assessed after 1 year. In vitro experiments examined the effects on cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, and the cell cycle of fibroblast, A2780, SKOV-3, HELA, and Ishikawa cells. Results: The FIR+bandage group showed significantly decreased tissue fluid and reduced limb circumference (p < 0.05) in comparison with the control group at 1 year. There was no increase of serum CA125 in both groups, and no recurrence of neoplasia or lymphadenopathy was detected. No adverse reactions were recorded. In addition, no changes were detected after FIR treatment for fibroblast, A2780, SKOV-3, HELA, and Ishikawa cells in cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle. Conclusion: FIR can be used to treat patients with GCRL following gynecological cancer treatment. Following clinical and experimental studies, we confirm that FIR is an oncologically safe treatment for lymphedema in gynecological tumor patients.

Investigation of the Less Known Effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage: A Narrative Review.

Background: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), one of the components of complex decongestive physiotherapy, which is accepted as the gold standard in the treatment of lymphedema, is used for therapeutic purposes in many diseases. The most well-known feature of MLD is that it helps to reduce edema. In addition to reducing edema, MLD has many effects, such as increasing venous flow, reducing fatigue, and raising the pain threshold. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study examining the effects of MLD other than its effects on edema in detail. The aim of this study is to compile effects of MLD and to provide a better understanding of the effects of MLD. Methods and Results: A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in July 2019, to identify different effects of MLD. The articles were chosen by, first, reading the abstract and subsequently data were analyzed by reading the entire text through full-text resources. To undertake the study, we have collected information published about different effects of MLD over the last 30 years (1989-2019). According to our results, 20 studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusions: This study suggests that MLD can be used in symptomatic treatment of various diseases (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease) considering the effects of MLD on the systems.

Lymphedema Index Ratio As Predictive Factor of Treatment in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Background: This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the lymphedema index ratio to predict the effect of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) and to establish a lymphedema index ratio cutoff value for the extent of CDT effect. Materials and Methods: All 108 enrolled patients with BCRL underwent volume measurements and bioelectrical impedance analysis before and after CDT. The difference in percent excess volume (PEV) before and after CDT was defined as the therapeutic effect, and each patient was assigned to Groups A, B, or C based on therapeutic effects of 0%-5%, 5%-10%, and 10%-20%, respectively. Results: The mean lymphedema index ratios of Groups A, B, and C were 1.27, 1.38, and 1.46, respectively, with significant differences between the groups (p < 0.01). The cutoff lymphedema index ratio values for diagnosis between Groups A and B and between Groups B and C were 1.277 (sensitivity: 71.7%, specificity: 61.8%) and 1.357 (sensitivity: 76.9%, specificity: 62.1%), respectively. The Spearman coefficients for the linear relationship between lymphedema index ratio and initial PEV and between lymphedema index ratio and therapeutic effect were found to be significant at 0.615 and 0.360, respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The results of this study found that the lymphedema index ratio may predict the volume reduction in patients with BCRL. A less reduction (therapeutic effect <5%) was predicted in patients with a lymphedema index ratio of <1.277, while a greater reduction (therapeutic effect >10%) was predicted in patients with a lymphedema index ratio of >1.357.