Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence.

For women undergoing mastectomy, breast reconstruction can be performed by using implants or autologous tissue flaps. Mastectomy options include skin- and nipple-sparing techniques. Implant-based reconstruction can be performed with saline or silicone implants. Various autologous pedicled or free tissue flap reconstruction methods based on different tissue donor sites are available. The aesthetic outcomes of implant- and flap-based reconstructions can be improved with oncoplastic surgery, including autologous fat graft placement and nipple-areolar complex reconstruction. The authors provide an update on recent advances in implant reconstruction techniques and contemporary expanded options for autologous tissue flap reconstruction as it relates to imaging modalities. As breast cancer screening is not routinely performed in this clinical setting, tumor recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction is often detected by palpation at physical examination. Most local recurrences occur within the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Diagnostic breast imaging continues to have a critical role in confirmation of disease recurrence. Knowledge of the spectrum of benign and abnormal imaging appearances in the reconstructed breast is important for postoperative evaluation of patients, including recognition of early and late postsurgical complications and breast cancer recurrence. The authors provide an overview of multimodality imaging of the postmastectomy reconstructed breast, as well as an update on screening guidelines and recommendations for this unique patient population. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Is Immediate Breast Reconstruction With a Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Safe for Starting Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer?

INTRODUCTION: Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy reduces perceptions of mutilation and femininity issues in oncological patients, but surgical complications should not delay chemotherapy. This study evaluated postsurgical complications in patients who underwent radical breast surgery followed by immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps and silicone implants, along with resulting impacts in delaying chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study utilized a prospectively maintained database. Clinical, surgical, and oncological data from 196 women were collected according to the operated side. Patients were grouped according to the time elapsed between surgery and the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy: ≤ 60 days (group 1), 61 to 90 days (group 2), or > 90 days (group 3). RESULTS: A total of 198 immediate reconstructions were performed on 196 patients between August 1, 2010 and March 31, 2020; after surgery, 47.4% had minor complications and 7.1% had major complications. Ninety-six patients (48.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The mean time elapsed between surgery and the first chemotherapy cycle was 65.4 days (median: 59), with 52.7% of the patients assigned to group 1, 37.4% to group 2, and 9.9% to group 3. The occurrence of major postoperative complications significantly affected the start of chemotherapy (64.0 vs. 94.5 days; P = .044). Additionally, patients with 2 or more comorbidities were more likely to experience major complications (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.03-10.95; P = .045) than those with 1 or 0. CONCLUSION: Major postoperative complications significantly delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in oncological patients who underwent radical breast surgery followed by immediate reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and silicone implants.

Postoperative Magnesium Sulfate Repletion Decreases Narcotic Use in Abdominal-Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Microsurgical breast reconstruction after mastectomy is now the standard of care for breast cancer patients. However, the costs and resources involved in free flap reconstruction can vary across different medical settings. To enhance patient outcomes in a cost-effective manner, we investigated the effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate (IV Mg) on postoperative opioid usage in this context. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all consecutive patients who underwent abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction in a single institute following an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Patients who received IV Mg were compared with those who did not receive supplementation. Serum magnesium levels at different time points, narcotic consumption in units of oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and other postoperative recovery parameters were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included. Those who received IV Mg on postoperative day 0 (n = 67) showed significantly lower serum magnesium levels before repletion (1.5 vs. 1.7 mg/dL, p = 0.004) and significantly higher levels on postoperative day 1 after repletion (2.2 vs. 1.7 mg/dL, p = 0.0002) compared to patients who received no magnesium repletion (n = 13). While both groups required a similar amount of narcotics on postoperative day 0 (20.2 vs. 13.2 MMEs, p = 0.2), those who received IV Mg needed significantly fewer narcotics for pain control on postoperative day 1 (12.2 MMEs for IV Mg vs. 19.8 MMEs for No Mg, p = 0.03). Recovery parameters, including maximal pain scores, postoperative mobilization, and length of hospital stay, did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe the potential analgesic benefits of routine postoperative magnesium repletion in abdominal-based free flap reconstruction. Further research is necessary to fully understand the role of perioperative magnesium supplementation as part of an ERAS protocol.

Significados atribuídos por mulheres com câncer de mama ao grupo de apoio / Meanings attributed by women with breast cancer to a support group / Significados atribuidos por las mujeres con cáncer de mama al grupo de apoyo

A sobrevivência ao câncer de mama é um problema de saúde pública que demanda serviços especializados com foco na reabilitação psicossocial. Entre as necessidades identificadas nesse contexto está o incentivo à adoção de estratégias de promoção de autocuidados pelas mulheres. Uma das estratégias adotadas consiste no grupo de apoio psicológico, que auxilia as pacientes a enfrentar a longa jornada do tratamento. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo é compreender os significados produzidos por mulheres com câncer de mama sobre sua participação em um grupo de apoio. Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo, descritivo e exploratório realizado com dez mulheres com câncer de mama usuárias de um serviço de reabilitação para mastectomizadas. Como referencial metodológico foi utilizada a Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de entrevista aberta em profundidade e os conteúdos foram transcritos e codificados. A análise indutiva e o método de comparação constante foram aplicados nos processos de codificação aberta, axial e seletiva, que permitiram identificar três categorias nucleares: percepção das atividades realizadas no grupo, identificação de benefícios e barreiras do convívio no grupo e transformações decorrentes da participação. As participantes significaram sua presença no grupo como fonte de acolhimento, apoio, desenvolvimento de recursos pessoais e amizades, contribuindo para promover sua qualidade de sobrevida. Além dos potenciais benefícios, também foram identificadas barreiras que podem dificultar a adesão e continuidade da participação no grupo, o que sugere a necessidade de incorporar no cuidado um olhar para as dimensões subjetivas da saúde da mulher.(AU)

Surviving breast cancer is a public health problem and depends on services focused on psychosocial rehabilitation. Healthcare providers must encourage women to adopt strategies to promote their self-care. The psychological support group is a resource that helps women to face the long journey of treatment. This study aimed to understand the meanings women with breast cancer produced about their participation in a support group. This exploratory cross-sectional study was carried out with 10 women with breast cancer who use a rehabilitation service for mastectomized patients. Grounded Theory was used as a methodological reference. An open in-depth interview was applied for data collection. The contents were transcribed and coded. Inductive analysis and the constant comparison method were applied in the open, axial, and selective coding processes, which enabled the identification of three core categories: perception of the activities carried out in the group, identification of benefits and barriers of living in the group, and transformations resulting from participation. Participants denote their involvement with the group as a source of shelter, support, development of personal resources and friendships that helps promoting quality of life. Besides these potential benefits, participants also evinced barriers that can hinder adherence and continuity of participation in the group, suggesting the importance of incorporating a look at the subjective dimensions of women's health into care.(AU)

Sobrevivir al cáncer de mama es un problema de salud pública que depende de los servicios centrados en la rehabilitación psicosocial. Entre las necesidades identificadas en esta materia se encuentra el uso de estrategias para promover el autocuidado. Uno de los recursos que ayuda a afrontar el largo camino del tratamiento es el grupo de apoyo psicológico. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer los significados que producen las mujeres con cáncer de mama sobre su participación en un grupo de apoyo. Se trata de un estudio cualitativo, descriptivo y exploratorio, realizado con diez mujeres con cáncer de mama usuarias de un servicio de rehabilitación para mastectomizadas. Como referencia metodológica se utilizó la teoría fundamentada en los datos. Se aplicó una entrevista abierta en profundidad para la recogida de datos, cuyos contenidos fueron transcritos y codificados. El análisis inductivo y el método de comparación constante se aplicaron en los procesos de codificación abierta, axial y selectiva, lo que permitió identificar tres categorías centrales: percepción de las actividades realizadas en el grupo, identificación de los beneficios y las barreras de vivir en el grupo y transformaciones resultantes de la participación. Las mujeres denotan su participación en el grupo como una fuente de acogida, apoyo, desarrollo de recursos personales y amistades, que ayuda a promover la calidad de vida. Además de los beneficios potenciales, también se identificaron barreras que pueden dificultar la adherencia y continuidad de la participación en el grupo, lo que sugiere la necesidad de incorporar en la atención una mirada centrada en las dimensiones subjetivas de la salud de las mujeres.(AU)

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction After Breast-Conserving Therapy and Radiation: Complications and Oncologic Safety.

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers improved, patient-centered outcomes with demonstrated oncologic safety ( Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:344-351). Indications for NSM continue to expand to patients outside of the traditional eligibility criteria, including those with prior breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with radiotherapy. Currently, limited data exist evaluating both short- and long-term outcomes in patients proceeding to NSM after prior BCT. METHODS: All patients undergoing bilateral NSM in a single institution from 2002 through 2017 with history of prior BCT were included in the final cohort, without exclusions. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, operative details, and complications. Outcomes assessed included early complications (<30 days from NSM), late complications (>30 days), rates of prosthetic failure, unplanned reoperations, and reconstructive failures, as well as oncologic safety. Student t , χ 2 , and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze outcomes of paired (BCT vs non-BCT) breasts within each patient. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients undergoing 34 NSMs were included. Each had a history of BCT and either ipsilateral breast recurrence (64.7%), risk-reducing NSM (23.5%), or a new contralateral primary cancer (11.8%). The cohort had a mean age of 51.1 years. With regard to acute complications (ischemia, infection, nipple-areolar complex or flap ischemia or necrosis, and wound dehiscence), there was no significant difference noted between breasts with prior BCT versus no prior BCT overall (41.2% vs 35.3%, respectively; P = 0.724). Complications occurring after 30 days postoperatively (capsular contracture, contour abnormality, animation deformity, bottoming out, rotation, and rippling) in prior BCT breasts versus no prior BCT had no significant differences overall (58.8% vs 41.2% respectively; P = 0.303). The mean follow-up was 5.5 years, during which no patients had a reported locoregional or distant recurrence in either breast. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in early or late complications were identified between breasts in patients undergoing bilateral NSM with a history of unilateral BCT and XRT. In the 5.5 years of follow-up, there were no recurrences, lending support to NSM for management of recurrent disease in addition to National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended total mastectomy. We propose that NSM should not be contraindicated in patients exposed to radiation with BCT.

Silicone Shell Breast Implants in Patients Undergoing Risk-Reducing Mastectomy With a History of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Adjuvant Radiotherapy: A Long-term Study.

BACKGROUND: Indications for breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (BCSAR) in patients with breast carcinoma are increasing, as are indications for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in healthy subjects. Most of these cases are reconstructed with silicone shell breast implants (SSBIs). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to study complications of SSBIs in breast reconstruction in patients undergoing RRM with previous BCSAR. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was designed. The study group included cases of RRM reconstructed with SSBI in patients who had previously undergone BCSAR in the same breast. The control group consisted of patients with high-risk breast cancer who had undergone RRM and immediate SSBI reconstruction without previous BCSAR. RESULTS: There was a history of BCSAR in 15.8% of cases. The first SSBI used in immediate reconstruction after RRM was replaced in 51.5% of cases with a mean [standard deviation] survival of 24.04 [28.48] months. BCSAR was significantly associated with pathological capsular contracture (P = .00) with this first SSBI (37.5% vs 5.9%). Of the cases requiring the replacement of the first SSBI, 44.23% suffered failure of the second SSBI, with a mean survival of 27.95 [26.53] months. No significant association was found between the consecutive development of capsular contracture in the second SSBI and a previous history of BCSAR (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: BCSAR prior to RRM reconstructed with an SSBI is associated with a significant increase in pathological capsular contracture. Patients should be warned of the high rate of SSBI complications and reconstruction failure. Polyurethane-coated implants may provide an alternative in cases in which alloplastic reconstruction is considered in patients with previous BCSAR.

Reducing Peri-implant Capsule Thickness in Submuscular Rodent Model of Breast Reconstruction With Delayed Radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Capsular contracture remains the most common complication following device-based breast reconstruction, occurring in up to 50% of women who also undergo adjuvant radiotherapy either before or after device-based reconstruction. While certain risk factors for capsular contracture have been identified, there remains no clinically effective method of prevention. The purpose of the present study is to determine the effect of coating the implant with the novel small molecule Met-Z2-Y12, with and without delayed, targeted radiotherapy, on capsule thickness and morphologic change around smooth silicone implants placed under the latissimus dorsi in a rodent model. METHODS: Twenty-four female Sprague Dawley rats each had 2 mL smooth round silicone breast implants implanted bilaterally under the latissimus dorsi muscle. Twelve received uncoated implants and twelve received implants coated with Met-Z2-Y12. Half of the animals from each group received targeted radiotherapy (20 Gray) on postoperative day ten. At three and 6 months after implantation, the tissue surrounding the implants was harvested for analysis of capsular histology including capsule thickness. Additionally, microCT scans were qualitatively analyzed for morphologic change. RESULTS: Capsules surrounding Met-Z2-Y12-coated implants were significantly thinner (P = 0.006). The greatest difference in capsule thickness was seen in the irradiated 6-month groups, where mean capsule thickness was 79.1 ± 27.3 µm for uncoated versus 50.9 ± 9.6 µm for Met-Z2-Y12-coated implants (P = 0.038). At the time of explant, there were no capsular morphologic differences between the groups either grossly or per microCT. CONCLUSIONS: Met-Z2-Y12 coating of smooth silicone breast implants significantly reduces capsule thickness in a rodent model of submuscular breast reconstruction with delayed radiotherapy.

Quality of life and satisfaction of patients after oncoplastic or traditional breast-conserving surgery using the BREAST-Q (BCT module): a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The oncoplastic conservative surgery was developed as a natural evolution of traditional surgery, attempting to improve the therapeutic and aesthetic outcomes where tumor resection could be followed by not-adequate results. Our primary aim is to evaluate how patient satisfaction and quality-of-life after conservative oncoplastic surgery, using BREAST-Q (BCT Module), change pre- and post-operatively. The secondary aim is to compare patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic or traditional conservative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 647 patients who underwent traditional conservative surgery or oncoplastic surgery from January 2020 to December 2022. Only 232 women (35.9%) completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire on a web-based platform, at the preoperative phase and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: The average score of "Psychosocial well-being" and "Satisfaction with Breasts" 3 months after surgery showed a statistically significant improvement, while the average score for "Physical well-being: Chest" at 3 months showed a worsening compared to the baseline. "Sexual well-being" did not show statistically significant change. A significant difference between the post-operative outcome of oncoplastic surgery and traditional surgery was observed only for Physical well-being (better for traditional surgery). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes 3 months after the surgery, except for physical discomfort that increases especially after oncoplastic surgery. Furthermore, our data, as well as many others, point to the appropriateness of using OCS where there is an effective indication, while the perspective of patients cannot find significant superiority over TCS in any of the areas analyzed.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Threatened Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Flaps: An Adjunct for Flap Salvage.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is emerging as the standard of care for treatment of breast cancer because of its oncologic safety and superior aesthetic outcomes. However, ischemia or necrosis of the skin flap and/or nipple-areola complex remain frequent complications. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has emerged as a potential adjunct for flap salvage, although it is not currently a widely accepted practice. Here we review our institution's experience using a protocol of HBOT in patients with signs of flap ischemia or necrosis after NSM. METHODS: Retrospective review identified all patients treated with HBOT at our institution's hyperbaric and wound care center because of signs of ischemia after NSM. Treatment parameters consisted of 90-minute dives at 2.0 atmosphere once or twice daily. Patients unable to tolerate dives were considered a treatment failure, whereas those lost to follow-up were excluded from analysis. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and treatment indications were recorded. Primary outcomes assessed were flap salvage (no operative revision), need for revision procedures, and treatment complications. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients and 25 breasts met the inclusion criteria. The mean ± SD time to initiation of HBOT was 9.47 ± 12.7 days. The mean ± SD age was 46.7 ± 10.4 years, and mean ± SD follow-up time was 36.5 ± 25.6 days. Indications for NSM included invasive cancer (41.2%), carcinoma in situ (29.4%), and breast cancer prophylaxis (29.4%). Initial reconstruction included tissue-expander placement (47.1%), autologous reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric flaps (29.4%), and direct-to-implant reconstruction (23.5%). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy indications included ischemia or venous congestion for 15 breasts (60.0%) and partial thickness necrosis for 10 breasts (40.0%). Flap salvage was achieved in 22 of 25 breasts (88.0%). Reoperation was required for 3 breasts (12.0%). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy-related complications were observed in 4 patients (23.5%), which included 3 patients with mild ear pain and 1 patient with severe sinus pressure leading to treatment abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is an invaluable tool for breast and plastic surgeons to achieve oncologic and cosmetic goals. However, ischemia or necrosis of the nipple-areola complex or mastectomy skin flap remains frequent complications. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has emerged as a possible intervention for threatened flaps. Our results demonstrate the utility of HBOT in this population to achieve excellent NSM flap salvage rates.

Breast Cancer Tumor Board: A Radiologist's Guide to Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.

Radiation therapy represents a pillar in the current management of breast cancer. Historically, postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has been administered only in patients with locally advanced disease and a poor prognosis. These included patients with large primary tumors at diagnosis and/or more than three metastatic axillary lymph nodes. However, during the past few decades, several factors have prompted a shift in perspective, and recommendations for PMRT have become more fluid. Guidelines for PMRT in the United States are outlined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society for Radiation Oncology. Because evidence to support performing PMRT is frequently discordant, the decision to offer radiation therapy often requires team discussion. These discussions are usually held in multidisciplinary tumor board meetings in which radiologists play a pivotal role by providing critical information such as the location and extent of disease. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy is optional and is safe in cases in which the patient's clinical status allows it. The preferred method in the setting of PMRT is autologous reconstruction. If this is not possible, then a two-step implant-based reconstruction is recommended. Radiation therapy does involve a risk of toxicity. Complications can be seen in acute and chronic settings and range from fluid collections and fractures to radiation-induced sarcomas. Radiologists have a key role in detecting these and other clinically relevant findings and should be prepared to recognize, interpret, and address them. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Breast augmentation under local anesthesia with intercostal blocks and light sedation.

INTRODUCTION: This study of breast augmentations performed under local anesthesia with intercostal blocks and light sedation describes the outcomes and evaluates benefits and complications. METHOD: From December 2005 until August 2019, 335 women consecutively underwent bilateral breast augmentation procedures. The anesthetic protocol consisted of an initial intravenous bolus of 1 mg midazolam and 0.25 mg alfentanil preoperatively. In 2017, this was changed to 2-4 mg midazolam intramuscularly, 1 mg midazolam intravenously, and 2.5 µg sufentanil intravenously. Intercostal blocks were injected at the midaxillary line into the intercostal spaces two to seven. The operating field was infiltrated with tumescent local anesthesia. Retrospective data extraction from patients' medical charts was done, registering demographics, dosage of anesthesia, surgical characteristics, complications, and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-one women underwent primary augmentation and 54 had implant replacement. The most common complications included suboptimal cosmetic results, asymmetry, and healing-related problems. The overall rate of reoperation was 16.1% within an average follow-up period of 2 years, ranging from 0 to 12.5 years. The majority of the reoperations were due to cosmetic reasons. The change in anesthetic regime was associated with a significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased need for supplementary medication with no increased risk of complications. CONCLUSION: Breast augmentations in local anesthesia with intercostal blocks and light sedation can be performed safely and can serve as an alternative to procedures in general anesthesia.

A descriptive comparison of satisfaction and well-being between expander-based and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The literature that has explored differences between direct-to-implant (DTI) and expander-based (EB) breast reconstruction has mainly focused on complications, with results not always unambiguous. Moreover, there are limited data 1) comparing DTI and EB breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and 2) from the patient's perspective. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare satisfaction and well-being in patients undergoing DTI and EB reconstruction after NSM in a Comprehensive Cancer Center, exploring what factors can be related to satisfaction and well-being. METHOD: The study design is monocentric, observational and retrospective. The participants completed an online questionnaire containing the Breast-Q and some socio-demographic variables (year of birth, level of education, civil status). Clinical information was obtained from the institutional database. Surgical techniques in the two branches of NSM were similar: all skin incisions, lateral to the areola; all implants, subpectoral (EB: conventionally submuscular; DTI: dual-plane pocket); all without synthetic mesh or acellular tissue matrix. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (45% with EB and 55% with DTI) completed the questionnaire. We found that there are no differences between EB and DTI concerning the satisfaction and well-being of NSM patients, except for satisfaction with information, which is greater in the DTI group. In EB patients, no variables among those explored are related to satisfaction and well-being. In DTI patients, level of education is positive related to satisfaction with implants and physical well-being, Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) and body mass index (BMI) are negative related to satisfaction with information and TNM also with satisfaction for plastic surgery. CONCLUSION: EB and DTI do not differ in terms of patient well-being, but EB requires a more careful counselling by the surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Ambulatory Surgery Versus Traditional Hospitalization Based on the Propensity Score Matching Method.

BACKGROUND: The positive benefits of immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction (IPBR) are incontrovertible. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care resources became scarce. The implementation of outpatient immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction (OIPBR) can improve the efficiency of medical care and reduce viral exposure. Very few studies have focused on OIPBR and this study aimed to fill this gap by evaluating outcomes of OIPBR compared with traditional hospitalization IPBR (THIPBR) in terms of complications and quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study enrolled patients undergoing IPBR at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between January 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. Outcomes were defined as postoperative complications and quality of life before reconstruction and at 3-month follow-up. Quality of life was assessed by BREAST-Q questionnaire. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score matching (PSM) were applied to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were enrolled, including 110 with THIPBR and 25 with OIPBR. After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. Patients with OIPBR had lower rates of lymphedema on the surgery side (p = 0.041) and readmission (p = 0.040) than patients with THIPBR. No statistically significant differences in the quality of life metrics of psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, satisfaction with breast and physical well-being of the chest were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: OIPBR is a safe and efficient alternative to THIBPR during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is recommended when medical conditions allow to conserve medical resources. Accelerated technical training for the performance of OIPBR at the hospital level should be expedited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Local recurrence of mammary Paget's disease after nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant breast reconstruction: a case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a rare case of local recurrent Paget's disease after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction with 10 years of disease-free survival and to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics. BACKGROUND: Mammary Paget's disease can be considered a rare type of local recurrence after breast cancer treatment, both in cases of conservative surgery and NSM with immediate breast reconstruction (Lohsiriwat et al, Ann Surg Oncol 19:1850-1855, 2012). Recurrent patients who present with nipple-areolar Paget's disease usually have unfavorable primary pathological characteristics and different latency periods. However, the recurrent status in patients with favorable primary pathological characteristics and the latency periods after NSM with immediate breast reconstruction are unclear. METHODS: First, we present a case of local recurrent Paget's disease in a young patient diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma at age 30 who underwent NSM with primary silicone reconstruction. Then, the keywords "Paget's disease" and "nipple-sparing mastectomy" were selected. Articles including the local recurrence of Paget's disease after NSM were collected from the PubMed, Springer, and OVID databases, and the acquired relevant data were analyzed. We did not restrict our search by study design or publication date. RESULTS: Five studies describing 31 cases of local recurrent Paget's disease after NSM with implant breast reconstruction were included. The mean patient age reported was 45 years, and the average latency period from NSM to the local recurrence of Paget's disease was 40.2 months. Recurrent tumor histological features were Paget's disease with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 16 patients (50%), Paget's disease without DCIS in 13 patients (40.6%), and Paget's disease with ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN) in 3 patients (9.4%). The primary tumor histological feature was estrogen receptor (ER)(-)/progesterone receptor (PR)(-)/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2)(+) in 21 patients (77.8%). Neither locoregional relapse nor metastatic events were found in these recurrent patients who accepted NAC excision after 4-5 years of follow-up. Our reported case showed that the patient experienced pregnancy and lactation after primary adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. However, she developed an eczematoid lesion in the NAC 120 months after breast surgery. The histopathological examination was consistent with Paget's disease of the breast. Complete NAC and breast silicone prosthesis removal were performed. The patient accepted no systematic or local therapy and is currently alive. It is noteworthy that the biological features of the primary tumor were ER(+), PR(+), and HER-2(-); however, the recurrent tumor changed to ER(-), PR(-), and HER-2(+). CONCLUSIONS: The local recurrence of Paget's disease after NSM is uncommon; it may develop at a very early age and have a very long time to recurrence, as in our patient, who presented with recurrence 10 years after primary surgery. Surgeons should be wary of local recurrence of the nipple-areola complex after NSM in patients with ER-negative and HER-2-positive primary tumors. However, patients with ER/PR-positive and HER-2-negative tumors should not be neglected; we reported a case of an ER/PR-positive and HER-2-negative primary tumor, and ER-positive recurrent cases have the longest latency period. The local recurrence rate of Paget's disease after NSM is low, and the prognosis is good in recurrent patients who accept further extensive NAC excision. Further systematic treatment was not considered for this patient.

Total autologous breast reconstruction with the Kiss Latissimus Dorsi Flap.

INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting breast actinic damage or implant-related complications require an autologous approach to breast reconstruction. However, when they are not good candidates for microsurgical procedures, alternative solutions must be sought. Latissimus dorsi (LD) is a workhorse flap in breast reconstruction, but often the amount of skin and volume achievable are insufficient. Taking inspiration from the Kiss flap concept, the authors hereby describe the "Kiss" LD flap to achieve totally autologous breast reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective service evaluation of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction with Kiss LD flap between 2018 and 2020 was performed. Patient demographics and operative variables were recorded, together with early and late complications. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were registered using the latest BREAST-Q reconstruction module, which includes specific LD scales. The questionnaire was administered to patients preoperatively and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent total autologous breast reconstruction with Kiss LD flap. Breast cancer and breast sarcoma resection were followed by reconstruction. The timing of reconstruction was immediate in 3 cases and delayed in 27 cases. No major complications nor total flap loss were registered. BREAST-Q scores postoperatively were significantly higher than the preoperative ones in every domain (p<0.0001) except for the physical well-being of back and shoulder, where the scores differed slightly and non-significantly (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Kiss LD flap allows to harvest a large amount of skin to restore the breast envelope and a considerable volume to reconstruct the breast mound in a completely autologous procedure.

[Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Conjuction with Lymphatic Microsurgery in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema]. / Autologe Brustrekonstruktion und lymphorekonstruktive Chirurgie nach Mastektomie bei Mammakarzinom-assoziiertem LymphödemAutologe Brustrekonstruktion in Kombination mit lymphorekonstruktiver ChirurgieCombined Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Autologous Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper extremity is the most significant non-oncological complication of tumour therapy, leading to functional impairment and impacting patients' quality of life. Autologous breast reconstruction per se effectively reduces incidence and stage of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment by surgical angiogenesis. In addition, modern surgical techniques for treating lymphedema are effective in reducing limb volume, circumference and functional impairment, and improving patients' quality of life, body image, integrity and local immunocompetence. Reconstructive surgery, including lymphovenous anastomoses (LVA) and vascularised lymph node transfer (VLNT), have been shown to rearrange or restore lymphatic flow and prevent stage progression. For patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema after mastectomy, autologous breast reconstruction in conjunction with lymphatic microsurgery using VLNT, LVA or a combination of these procedures offers the option of holistic and single-stage restoration in modern senology. Extensive scar release in the axilla is a crucial component of the surgical technique, aiming to prepare the recipient bed for the VLN transplant and to allow for the functional recruitment of remaining lymph vessels of the upper extremity. This article presents the indications, preoperative diagnostic evaluation, surgical techniques and precautions, complications and results of combined lymphatic and breast restoration.

Breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis and acellular dermal matrix of porcine origin: Retrospective study of 84 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Breast reconstruction (BR) using a prosthesis implant (PI) associated with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is a known method that has been the subject of discussion in recent years. The objective of this study was to quantify the rate of PI removal after BR using prosthesis combined with ADM, and to identify the risk factors in the event of removal. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were patients who had undergone immediate (IBR) or delayed (DBR) breast reconstruction with placement of a PI associated with porcine ADM. The primary endpoint was the postoperative removal of the PI. RESULTS: In all, 84 reconstructions were performed. The mean age of the population was 57.5 years. 25.9% of the patients were active smokers at the time of surgery. 89.5% of patients had previously benefited from ipsilateral breast radiation therapy (IBRT) in DBR, 10.5% in IBR. The PI deposition rate, all BR combined, was 21.4%. It was 52.17% in smokers and 9.84% in non-smokers (P<0.0001), making smoking an independent risk factor for reconstruction failure (hazard ratio (HR)=7.4, 95%CI [2.64-20.9]). IBRT was also a risk factor for PI removal, especially when performed after IBR (HR=8.1, 95%CI [1.1-62.1]). CONCLUSION: Smoking and adjuvant IBRT are risk factors for failure of reconstruction by PI associated with ADM. This type of reconstruction should be selected for non-smokers who have not undergone IBRT and therefore could be a therapeutic alternative in the BR panel.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Safety and efficacy of reverse sequence compared to standard technique?

BACKGROUND: The reverse sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, mastectomy then immediate breast reconstruction is currently proposed for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Few studies have compared it to the standard sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy with or without differed reconstruction. Our study compares overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survivals of breast cancer patients treated with reverse sequence compared to the standard technique. METHODS: In this retrospective, single center study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in France, patients were included if: female, age <65y, had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy, and were M0. Outcomes for patients treated by reverse sequence (RS) are compared to those for patients treated by standard sequence (ST). Data was collected from medical records. RESULTS: From January 2009 to April 2018, 222 eligible patients were treated, 46 by RS and 176 by ST. Mean follow-up was 61.7 months. Five-year OS and RFS did not differ between groups. 5-yr OS: 88.4% 95%CI [74.1-95.0] for RS and 81.5% 95%CI [74.0-87.0] for ST (P = 0.4412); 5-yr RFS: 78.3% 95%CI [61.9-88.3] for RS and 70.1% 95%CI [62.2-76.7] for ST (P = 0.3003). Overall treatment time was significantly shorter in the RS group, and the rate of severe surgical complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: For locally advanced breast cancer patients with an indication for radiation therapy the reverse sequence offers similar safety and efficacy results as the standard treatment while allowing immediate breast reconstruction. However, careful patient selection is necessary, particularly with regard to preoperative lymph node invasion.