Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 73
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(11): 2478-2485, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975812

RESUMO

Access to comprehensive dementia care is limited. Recent changes in billing for professional services, including new physician fee schedule codes, encourage clinicians to provide new services; however, current reimbursement does not cover costs for all needed elements of dementia care. The Payment Model for Comprehensive Dementia Care Conference convened more than 50 national experts from diverse perspectives to review promising strategies for payment reform including ways to accelerate their adoption. Recommendations for reform included payments for services to family caregivers; new research to determine success metrics; education for consumers, providers, and policymakers; and advancing a population health model approach to tier coverage based on risk and need within a health system.


Assuntos
Assistência Integral à Saúde/economia , Demência/terapia , Cuidadores/economia , Congressos como Assunto , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Demência/economia , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Medicaid , Medicare , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Estados Unidos
2.
BMJ Open ; 9(3): e022293, 2019 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30878976

RESUMO

INTERVENTIONS: Targeted therapies have been proven to provide clinical benefits to patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib was initially approved and reimbursed as a third-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC by the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) in 2004; subsequently it became a second-line therapy (in 2007) and further a first-line therapy (in 2011) for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Another targeted therapy, erlotinib, was initially approved as a third-line therapy in 2007, and it became a second-line therapy in 2008. OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed towards an exploration of the impacts of the Taiwan NHI reimbursement policies (removing reimbursement restrictions) related to accessibility of targeted therapies. SETTING: We retrieved 2004-2013 claims data for all patients with lung cancer diagnoses from the NHI Research Database. DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Using an interrupted time series design and segmented regression, we estimated changes in the monthly prescribing rate by patient number and market shares by cost following each modification of the reimbursement policy for gefitinib and erlotinib for NSCLC treatment. RESULTS: Totally 92 220 patients with NSCLC were identified. The prescribing rate of the targeted therapies increased by 15.58%, decreased by 10.98% and increased by 6.31% following the introduction of gefitinib as a second-line treatment in 2007, erlotinib as a second-line treatment in 2008 and gefitinib as as first line treatment in 2011, respectively. The average time to prescription reduced by 65.84% and 41.59% following coverage of erlotinib by insurance and gefitinib/erlotinib as second-line treatments in 2007-2008 and following gefitinib as the first-line treatment in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: The changes in reimbursement policies had a significant impact on the accessibility of targeted therapies for NSCLC treatment. Removing reimbursement restrictions can significantly increase the level and the speed of drug accessibility.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Antineoplásicos/economia , Cloridrato de Erlotinib/economia , Cloridrato de Erlotinib/uso terapêutico , Gefitinibe/economia , Gefitinibe/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Taiwan/epidemiologia
3.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404630

RESUMO

As is the case in other sectors, innovative digital products have started to enter the health market, too. If digital products like apps are considered medical devices, startups are often confronted with regulatory procedures that they deem to be slow and with which they are not familiar. This applies to both the certification procedures and the requirements and procedures for reimbursement, where problems could occur. The aim of this article is to better understand the startups' experience in navigating through these procedures, the hurdles they encounter, and their need for support. Therefore, the digital association Bitkom e. V. and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) conducted a web-based survey on five themes with a total of 23 questions. These questions focused inter alia on the composition of the team, product planning, familiarity with regulatory requirements, experience with institutions and different sources of information, the assessment of challenges in the process, and the resulting need for support.The analysis on the basis of 18 complete replies has shown that startups work on products with documentation and communications functions, but also integrate diagnostic and therapeutic features. The latter are characteristics of medical devices. Startups consider themselves to be relatively familiar with regulatory requirements regarding medical devices. The largest hurdles are associated with reimbursement: long and costly processes until the startups' products could be reimbursed.Both with regard to reimbursement and certification, startups see a need for low-threshold, cost-efficient advisory services and a simplification and acceleration of existing procedures with regard to medical devices.


Assuntos
Certificação/organização & administração , Comércio/organização & administração , Legislação de Dispositivos Médicos/organização & administração , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Certificação/legislação & jurisprudência , Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Equipamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Alemanha , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Software , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência
4.
J Health Econ ; 61: 259-273, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823796

RESUMO

US policymakers place high priority on tying Medicare payments to the value of care delivered. A critical part of this effort is the Hospital Value-based Purchasing Program (HVBP), which rewards or penalizes hospitals based on their quality and episode-based costs of care and incentivizes integration between hospitals and post-acute care providers. Within HVBP, each patient affects hospital performance on a variety of quality and spending measures, and performance translates directly to changes in program points and ultimately dollars. In short, hospital revenue from a patient consists not only of the DRG payment, but also of that patient's marginal future reimbursement. We estimate the magnitude of the marginal future reimbursement for individual patients across each type of quality and performance measure. We describe how those incentives differ across hospitals, including integrated and safety-net hospitals. We find evidence that hospitals improved their performance over time in the areas where they have the highest marginal incentives to improve care, and that integrated hospitals responded more than non-integrated hospitals.


Assuntos
Medicare/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Medicare/organização & administração , Michigan/epidemiologia , Modelos Estatísticos , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/economia , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/organização & administração
8.
Psychol Serv ; 13(1): 110-9, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26845494

RESUMO

The potential expansion of insurance coverage through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 can facilitate the reduction of access barriers and improved quality for behavioral health care. More than 5 million of the newly insured are expected to have mental health and substance use disorders. In addition, state and federal efforts to integrate behavioral and medical health needs through patient-centered medical home models and innovations in payment strategies provide an unprecedented opportunity to use federal financial support to improve not only access to care, but also improve quality through active care coordination, use of interdisciplinary teams, colocating services, and engaging in warm hand-offs between providers in the same setting. These potential advances are hindered in 24 different states because of Medicaid payment policy, with 7 explicitly limiting the ability to reimburse for physical health and behavioral health services on the same day for all providers. Without the ability for providers to be reimbursed for different services on the same day to improve behavioral and medical health care coordination, these states could be limited in their ability to improve care via patient-centered approaches and interdisciplinary team-based care that would involve physicians, clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and other mental health professionals. Limits on same-day billing in Medicaid programs could impact up to 36.7 million people in 24 states, which is approximately 52.6% of all Medicaid enrollees.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Medicaid/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Honorários e Preços , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
9.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 40(4): 711-44, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26124302

RESUMO

Prices are the major driver of why the United States spends so much more on health care than other countries do. The pricing power that hospitals have garnered recently has resulted from consolidated delivery systems and concentrated markets, leading to enhanced negotiating leverage. But consolidation may be the wrong frame for viewing the problem of high and highly variable prices; many "must-have" hospitals achieve their pricing power from sources other than consolidation, for example, reputation. Further, the frame of consolidation leads to unrealistic expectations for what antitrust's role in addressing pricing power should be, especially because in the wake of two periods of merger "manias" and "frenzies" many markets already lack effective competition. It is particularly challenging for antitrust to address extant monopolies lawfully attained. New payment and delivery models being pioneered in Medicare, especially those built around accountable care organizations (ACOs), offer an opportunity to reduce pricing power, but only if they are implemented with a clear eye on the impact on prices in commercial insurance markets. This article proposes approaches that public and private payers should consider to complement the role of antitrust to assure that ACOs will actually help control costs in commercial markets as well as in Medicare and Medicaid.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/organização & administração , Comércio/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Competição Econômica/organização & administração , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/normas , Leis Antitruste , Comércio/economia , Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Custos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Competição Econômica/economia , Competição Econômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Eficiência Organizacional , Honorários Médicos , Instituições Associadas de Saúde/organização & administração , Preços Hospitalares , Humanos , Seguradoras , Medicare/organização & administração , Negociação , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Estados Unidos
10.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 10(2): 335-9, 2015 Feb 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25403923

RESUMO

The Affordable Care Act is the most visible element of health care reform. However, both before the Affordable Care Act and now with the acceleration since its passage, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid have been and are testing integrated care models in medicine in general as well as nephrology. The pressures to do so come from the well known increasing costs of health care in the face of a number of clear gaps in quality. The future will likely be more and more integrated care with less and less fee for service. More measurement of quality and the linking of quality measures to payments are also all but certain future elements of the health care economy. Nephrologists need to educate themselves on these trends and be prepared to engage them for the good of the profession and the improvement in care for patients.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Nefrologia/organização & administração , Papel do Médico , Médicos/organização & administração , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Medicare/organização & administração , Modelos Organizacionais , Nefrologia/economia , Nefrologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Médicos/economia , Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
11.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 33(8): 1345-52, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25092835

RESUMO

To determine whether bundled payment could be an effective payment model for California, the Integrated Healthcare Association convened a group of stakeholders (health plans, hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, physician organizations, and vendors) to develop, through a consensus process, the methods and means of implementing bundled payment. In spite of a high level of enthusiasm and effort, the pilot did not succeed in its goal to implement bundled payment for orthopedic procedures across multiple payers and hospital-physician partners. An evaluation of the pilot documented a number of barriers, such as administrative burden, state regulatory uncertainty, and disagreements about bundle definition and assumption of risk. Ultimately, few contracts were signed, which resulted in insufficient volume to test hypotheses about the impact of bundled payment on quality and costs. Although bundled payment failed to gain a foothold in California, the evaluation provides lessons for future bundled payment initiatives.


Assuntos
Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Ortopedia/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Adulto , California , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estados Unidos
14.
Health Policy ; 116(2-3): 196-205, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24314624

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To control increasing pharmaceutical expenditures, Taiwan's National Health Insurance has implemented a series of drug reimbursement price reductions since 2000. This study examined changes in use and expenditures of oral antidiabetic medications following the price regulation in November 2006. METHODS: We obtained claims data between January 2006 and August 2007 from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We categorized oral antidiabetic products as affected by the reimbursement reduction ("targeted") or not ("non-targeted"), by level of relative price reduction, and by manufacturer type (international vs. local manufacturers). We used an interrupted time series design and segmented regression models to estimate changes in monthly per capita prescribing rate, volume, and insurance reimbursement expenditures following the policy. RESULTS: The majority (129/178; 72.5%) of oral antidiabetic products were targeted by this round of price reductions. There was a relative reduction of 9.5% [95%CI: -12.68, -6.32] in total expenditures at ten months post-policy compared to expected rates. For targeted products, there were 2.04% [95%CI: -4.15, 0.07] and 13.26% [95%CI: -16.64, -9.87] relative reductions in prescribing rate and expenditures, respectively, at ten months post-policy. Non-targeted products increased significantly (22% [95%CI: 10.49, 33.51] and 22.85% [95%CI: 11.69, 34.01] relative increases in prescribing rate and expenditures respectively). Larger reimbursement cuts led to greater reductions in prescribing rate, volume, and insurance reimbursement expenditures of targeted products. Prescribing rates of both targeted and non-targeted products by international manufacturers declined after the policy while rates of prescribing non-targeted products by local manufacturers increased. CONCLUSIONS: While total government expenditures for oral antidiabetic medications were contained by the policy, our results indicate that prescribing shifted at the margin from targeted to non-targeted products and from international to local products. Further research is warranted to understand how changes in medication use due to price regulation policies affect medication adherence and patient health outcomes.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estatística & dados numéricos , Taiwan/epidemiologia
15.
Chirurg ; 85(4): 334-41, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23954906

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that approximately 1 million adults in Germany suffer from grade III obesity. The aim of this article is to describe the challenges faced when constructing an operative obesity center. METHODS: The inflow of patients as well as personnel and infrastructure of the interdisciplinary Diabetes and Obesity Center in Heidelberg were analyzed. The distribution of continuous data was described by mean values and standard deviation and analyzed using variance analysis. RESULTS: The interdisciplinary Diabetes and Obesity Center in Heidelberg was founded in 2006 and offers conservative therapeutic treatment and all currently available operative procedures. For every operative intervention carried out an average of 1.7 expert reports and 0.3 counter expertises were necessary. The time period from the initial presentation of patients in the department of surgery to an operation was on average 12.8 months (standard deviation SD ± 4.5 months). The 47 patients for whom remuneration for treatment was initially refused had an average body mass index (BMI) of 49.2 kg/m(2) and of these 39 had at least the necessity for treatment of a comorbidity. Of the 45 patients for whom the reason for the refusal of treatment costs was given as a lack of conservative treatment, 30 had undertaken a medically supervised attempt at losing weight over at least 6 months. Additionally, 19 of these patients could document participation in a course at a rehabilitation center, a Xenical® or Reduktil® therapy or had undertaken the Optifast® program. For the 20 patients who supposedly lacked a psychosomatic evaluation, an adequate psychosomatic evaluation was carried out in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of an operative obesity center can last for several years. A essential prerequisite for success seems to be the constructive and targeted cooperation with the health insurance companies.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Comportamento Cooperativo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hospitais Especializados/organização & administração , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Obesidade/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Análise Custo-Benefício/organização & administração , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Alemanha , Humanos , Licenciamento Hospitalar/economia , Licenciamento Hospitalar/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Avaliação das Necessidades/organização & administração , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Falha de Tratamento
16.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; 25: 1-12, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24133696

RESUMO

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and states are partnering to transform health care systems by creating and testing new models of care delivery and payment. Interviews with officials from states participating in the State Innovation Models (SIM) Initiative reveal that the readiness of providers and payers to adopt innovations var­ies, requiring different starting points, goals, and strategies. So far, effective strategies appear to include: building on past reform efforts; redesigning health information technol­ogy to provide reliable, targeted data on care costs and quality; and using standard perfor­mance measures and financial incentives to spur alignment of providers' and payers' goals. State governments also have policy levers to encourage efficient deployment of a diverse health care workforce. As federal officials review states' innovation plans, set timetables, and provide technical assistance, they can also take steps to accommodate the budgetary, political, and time constraints that states are facing.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Difusão de Inovações , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos
17.
Nefrología (Madr.) ; 33(3): 301-307, abr.-jun. 2013. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-114514

RESUMO

La enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) representa uno de los principales problemas de salud pública debido a los altos costes sociales y económicos tanto por su elevada prevalencia como por la morbimortalidad cardiovascular asociada. Existen suficientes evidencias que demuestran que la implementación de modelos de prevención y de seguimiento mejora la evolución y frena la progresión de la ERC reduciendo los costes al mismo tiempo que mejora o se mantiene la calidad en la atención. Se requieren, por tanto, nuevos modelos que manejen de forma integral todos los niveles de la ERC. Aunque existen diferentes modelos de reembolso por parte de las aseguradoras o los gobiernos, tradicionalmente el pago por servicios ha sido el utilizado en los centros de diálisis concertados pagándose por sesiones de diálisis y unos requerimientos mínimos de calidad. Este modelo comporta el riesgo de favorecer la sobreutilización e inducción a la demanda. Sin embargo, cuando se acerca el estadio final de la ERC (inicio de la diálisis), el manejo integral mediante una tarifa comprensiva ofrece ventajas basadas en un principio de equidad, calidad y sostenibilidad. El reembolso se realiza a través de un pago único y completo de un paquete asistencial que cubre los servicios que se han definido previamente. La tarifa se estima con base en la utilización previa de recursos, sin tener en cuenta la prevalencia de la enfermedad. Un tercer modelo es la capitación. Esta ofrece a los proveedores una cantidad fija de dinero para proporcionar servicios a una determinada población (..) (AU)


Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is becoming a worldwide major public health problem that is rapidly approaching epidemic proportions due to its high prevalence, as well as the associated increase of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in these patients. Early detection and prevention may have an impact on both slowing the progression of CKD and reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. CKD prevention programmes can be more cost-efficient over time without negative impacts on quality of care. Until now, reimbursement in CKD has been segmented and usually focused on the end of the process (dialysis) when cost is higher, whereas new models focused on provider integration, while balancing quality and costs, are needed to respond to today's challenges. Traditionally, "pay for services" has been used in state-assisted dialysis centres, but this model has the risk of inducing an increase in demand. Integrated management would respond to this challenge with comprehensive solutions that manage kidney disease at all levels of health care risk. It is based on a comprehensive model that (..) (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Assistência Integral à Saúde/organização & administração , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Unidades Hospitalares/organização & administração , Modelos Organizacionais , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
18.
J Med Pract Manage ; 28(4): 254-6, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23547503

RESUMO

As discussed in Part I of this article, hospital executives in Canada, Germany, and the United States manage their facilities' resources to maximize the incentives inherent in their respective reimbursement system and thereby increase their bottom line. It was also discussed that an additional supply of available hospitals, physicians, and other services will generate increased utilization. Part II discusses how the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 will eventually fail since it neither controls prices nor utilization (e.g., imaging, procedures, ambulatory surgery, discretionary spending). This article concludes with the discussion of the German multipayer approach with universal access and global budgets that might well be a model for U.S. healthcare in the future. Although the German healthcare system has a number of shortfalls, its paradigm could offer the most appropriate compromise when selecting the economic incentives to reduce the percentage of the U.S. gross domestic product expenditure for healthcare from 17.4% to roughly 12.0%.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Reembolso de Incentivo/organização & administração , Orçamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Orçamentos/organização & administração , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/legislação & jurisprudência , Análise Custo-Benefício/organização & administração , Comparação Transcultural , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Custos Hospitalares/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/provisão & distribuição , National Health Insurance, United States/economia , National Health Insurance, United States/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
19.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 471(6): 1824-31, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23296749

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The key to successfully aligning hospitals and physicians is financial integration and joint incentives for academic, quality, and clinical productivity. Many physician practices and health systems are moving toward closer integration, but mainly through consolidation and employment strategies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We describe a fully integrated physician and hospital relationship including an overview of an aligned funds flow process that affords the department support for clinical services and teaching, research, and administrative activity. We also describe a physician compensation model that provides incentive not only for increased clinical performance, but also quality and academic objectives. METHODS: The content of this article was acquired through our own experience in managing the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania Health System including the health system's funds flow process. Based on input from both health system leaders and the faculty, the department's compensation plan was totally redesigned to create a line-of-sight plan that credits clinical performance and academic productivity. RESULTS: Our model is multifactorial and provides sustainable support for the department and a compensation plan that is competitive within the local market and nationally. The health system's funds flow process has enhanced alignment of the faculty and hospitals by providing compensation for nonclinical time and assists the department's growth strategies by providing funding for new faculty and gain-sharing of improved hospital margin. The implementation of the compensation plan increased productivity by 8% in its first year with no additional resources. Academic productivity in that same year was arguably at or above any other year in the department's history in terms of accepted publications, national presentations, and research grants awarded. CONCLUSIONS: A model of complete integration between an academic department and a health system is achievable through a systematic process of mission-based support.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Planos para Motivação de Pessoal , Administração Hospitalar , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Parcerias Público-Privadas , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Eficiência , Docentes de Medicina , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionais , Cultura Organizacional , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Faculdades de Medicina/organização & administração
20.
Coll Antropol ; 36(3): 717-27, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23213925

RESUMO

The Republic of Croatia's accession to the European Union (EU) will affect all segments of economy and society, including the health care system. The aim of this paper is to establish the potential effects of joining the EU on Croatian health care, as well as to assess its readiness to enter this regional economic integration. The paper identifies potential areas of impact of EU accession on Croatian health care and analyzes the results of the conducted empirical research. In this research, a method of in-depth interviews was applied on a sample of 49 subjects; health professionals from public and private sectors, health insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, drug wholesalers, and non-governmental organisations (patient associations). Once Croatia joins the EU, it will face: new rules and priorities in line with the current European health strategy; the possibilities of drawing funds from European cohesion funds; labour migrations; new guidelines on patient safety and mobility. From the aspect of harmonising national regulations with EU regulations in the area of health care, Croatian system can be assessed as ready to enter the EU. Croatia's accession to the EU can result in a better information flow, growth of competitiveness of Croatian health care system, enhanced quality, inflow of EU funds, development of health tourism, but also in increased migration of health care professionals, and potential increase in the cost of health care services. Functioning within the EU framework might result in adaptation to the EU standards, but it could also result in the concentration of staff and institutions in larger cities.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Cooperação Internacional , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendências , Croácia , Emigração e Imigração/tendências , União Europeia , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Turismo Médico/tendências , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA