Direct primary care-Where does integrated behavioral health fit?

Primary care is increasingly viewed as key to growing health system market share in value-based purchasing strategies for both public- and private-sector programs. Yet not all primary care physicians are interested in becoming part of large multispecialty practices or working in employed arrangements. Instead, a growing number of physicians are launching independent direct primary care (DPC) practices in order to maintain professional autonomy, mitigate burnout, and ensure long-term meaningful engagement with patients and families. Given that the typical size of a DPC care team is small, what does this mean for integrating behavioral health? As primary care evolves under various payment and delivery models, the integration of behavioral health services will require adaptability based on practice size, scope of practice, patient acuity, and payment model. Indeed, advocates of integrated behavioral health can "skate to where the puck is going to be"1 by familiarizing themselves with innovations in primary care, such as the DPC model. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Implementing integrated behavioral health: Testing associations between shared clinical time and space and provider referrals.

INTRODUCTION: Behavioral health provider (BHP) availability is widely acknowledged as an important factor in the effectiveness of an integrated care approach within primary care. However, there is little research providing evidence of the impact of BHP availability on physician uptake of integrated behavioral health (IBH) services. METHOD: This quasi-experimental study examines whether shared clinical time and space with a BHP is associated with providers' number of standard IBH referrals and proportion of warm handoffs within total behavioral health (BH) referrals. Data are from 2 family medicine outpatient clinics with 1 shared, part-time BHP and were gathered across 4 months (2,847 unique patients served) using electronic health record chart review of patients referred for BH services. RESULTS: Results of a Poisson regression indicated greater shared time and space between BHP and providers is significantly associated with a greater number of providers' standard IBH referrals, χ²(df = 1, N = 15) = 13.67, p = .000. Results of general linear modeling indicate greater shared time and space is also associated with a greater proportion of warm handoffs (percentage of total referrals). A 1-unit increase in percentage of schedule overlap was associated with a 110% increase in likelihood of a family medicine provider making a warm handoff, Exp(ß) = 2.10, p = .007. DISCUSSION: This exploratory study provides initial evidence to support the notion that shared time and space between BHPs and physicians is an essential component of effective integrated care. Future research is needed to evaluate how shared time and space impact the accessibility, adoption, and effectiveness of the BHP. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Behavioral Medicine: a retro/prospective view of the field.

The year 2017 was the 40th anniversary of the convening of the Yale Conference on Behavioral Medicine (Schwartz and Weiss, 1977). In honor of this defining moment in the history of the birthing of behavioral medicine as a formal integrative field of biobehavioral theories, research and applications, we were invited by the editors to take a retrospective and prospective look at the field. Recognizing that much has been written about this history over the years, we decided to write about the "back-channel," presenting never-before shared events associated with the birthing and evolution of the field in a way that would be fun to write and read. In the process we look back at the evolving definitions of behavioral medicine in light of contemporary advances and controversies in science. Our review includes a discussion of some of the present challenges/opportunities, and then considers the future with some "outside the box" possibilities. We outline some of the enormous advances which have taken place in technology since the 1970s and consider how such technologies can be transformative in redefining our field.

Behavioral health integration and the risks of reductionism.

This editorial focuses on the topic of behavioral health integrations. It discusses the differences in types of integrated care and provides examples of practice elements that could be included under the umbrella of integrated care. (PsycINFO Database Record

Legislative and Policy Developments and Imperatives for Advancing the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model.

The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) practice model continues to gain converts among primary care and behavioral health professionals as the evidence supporting its effectiveness continues to accumulate. Despite a growing number of practices and organizations using the model effectively, widespread implementation has been hampered by outmoded policies and regulatory barriers. As policymakers and legislators begin to recognize the contributions that PCBH model services make to the care of complex patients and the expansion of access to those in need of behavioral health interventions, some encouraging policy initiatives are emerging and the policy environment is becoming more favorable to implementation of the PCBH model. This article outlines the necessity for policy change, exposing the policy issues and barriers that serve to limit the practice of the PCBH model; highlights innovative approaches some states are taking to foster integrated practice; and discusses the compatibility of the PCBH model with the nation's health care reform agenda. Psychologists have emerged as leaders in the design and implementation of PCBH model integration and are encouraged to continue to advance the model through the demonstration of efficient and effective clinical practice, participation in the expansion of an appropriately trained workforce, and advocacy for the inclusion of this practice model in emerging healthcare systems and value-based payment methodologies.

Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model Research: Current State of the Science and a Call to Action.

The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model of service delivery is being used increasingly as an effective way to integrate behavioral health services into primary care. Despite its growing popularity, scientifically robust research on the model is lacking. In this article, we provide a qualitative review of published PCBH model research on patient and implementation outcomes. We review common barriers and potential solutions for improving the quantity and quality of PCBH model research, the vital data that need to be collected over the next 10 years, and how to collect those data.

The State and Future of the Primary Care Behavioral Health Model of Service Delivery Workforce.

The growth of the Primary Care Behavioral Health model (PCBH) nationally has highlighted and created a workforce development challenge given that most mental health professionals are not trained for primary care specialization. This work provides a review of the current efforts to retrain mental health professionals to fulfill roles as Behavioral Health Consultants (BHCs) including certificate programs, technical assistance programs, literature and on-the-job training, as well as detail the future needs of the workforce if the model is to sustainably proliferate. Eight recommendations are offered including: (1) the development of an interprofessional certification body for PCBH training criteria, (2) integration of PCBH model specific curricula in graduate studies, (3) integration of program development skill building in curricula, (4) efforts to develop faculty for PCBH model awareness, (5) intentional efforts to draw students to graduate programs for PCBH model training, (6) a national employment clearinghouse, (7) efforts to coalesce current knowledge around the provision of technical assistance to sites, and (8) workforce specific research efforts.

Primary Care Integration of Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services: A Primer for Providers and Case Report of Local Implementation.

Mental health conditions are common, disabling, potentially life-threatening, and costly; however, they are mostly treatable with early detection and intervention. Unfortunately, mental healthcare is in significantly short supply both nationally and locally, and particularly in small, rural, and relatively isolated communities. This article provides physicians and other health practitioners with a primer on the basic rationale and principles of integrating behavioral healthcare - particularly psychiatric specialty care - in primary care settings, including effective use of teleconferencing. Referring to a local-based example, this paper describes the programmatic components (universal screening, telephone availability, mutually educational team rounds, as-needed consultations, etc) that operationalize and facilitate successful primary care integration, and illustrates how these elements are applied to population segments with differing needs for behavioral healthcare involvement. Lastly, the article discusses the potential value of primary care integration in promoting quality, accessibility, and provider retention; discusses how new developments in healthcare financing could enhance the sustainability of primary care integration models; and summarizes lessons learned.

Meeting Women Where They Are: Integration of Care As the Foundation of Treatment for At-Risk Pregnant and Postpartum Women.

Purpose In these times of rapidly changing health care policies, those involved in the health care of women, especially during the reproductive years, have a unique and daunting opportunity. There is great potential to positively impact women's health through focus on prevention, attention to addressing disparities, and new focus on the integration of behavioral health care in primary care settings. Description In this report from the field, we suggest that the integration of mental health care into other health services and addressing underlying social needs by partnering with community-based organizations should be a top priority for all settings seeking to provide excellent health care for women. Assessment We describe our experience in a diverse, urban, safety net system to draw attention to four areas of innovation that others might adapt in their own systems: (1) addressing social support and other social determinants of health; (2) tailoring services to the specific needs of a population; (3) developing integrated and intensive cross-disciplinary services for high-risk pregnant women; and (4) bridging the divide between prenatal and postpartum care. Conclusion Women are more likely to be engaged with healthcare during their pregnancy. This engagement, however limited, may be a unique "window of opportunity" to help them address mental health concerns and implement positive behavior change. Future work should include research and program evaluation of innovative programs designed to serve the entire family and meeting at-risk women where they are.

Integration of behavioral health and primary care: current knowledge and future directions.

Integrated behavioral health in primary care has spread rapidly over the past three decades, although significant questions remain unanswered regarding best practices in clinical, financial and operational worlds. Two key models have emerged over time: care management and Primary Care Behavioral Health. Research to date has been promising; however, there is a significant need for more sophisticated multi-level scientific methodologies to fill in the gaps in current knowledge of integrated primary care. In this paper, we summarize current scientific knowledge about integrated primary care and critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this knowledge base, focusing on clinical, financial and operational factors. Finally, we recommended priorities for future research, dissemination, real-world implementation, and health policy implications.

Psychologists in public health: Historical aspects and current challenges.

This article presents the historical context of the insertion of psychology, as a profession, in health policies in Brazil, in order to understand its current challenges. Analysis was based on a non-systematic literature review about professional training, practice, and research in psychology. Three challenges were identified: working in high social vulnerability contexts, practice in multidisciplinary teams and the need to expand the research agenda. We conclude that dealing with these challenges will depend on the area's capacity to reinvent itself and become more permeable to interdisciplinary dialogue.

Biofeedback de resistencia galvánica y psicoterapia. Una combinación de éxito en la lucha contra el dolor / No disponible

No disponible

Behavioral medicine for migraine and medication overuse headache.

Primary headaches, including migraine and medication overuse headache (MOH), can be conceptualized as biobehavioral disorders based on the interaction of biological, psychological, and environmental factors. This article reviews empirically supported and efficacious behavioral approaches to the treatment and management of headaches in general, with an emphasis on migraine and MOH from a biopsychosocial perspective. Evidence-based behavioral medicine treatments for migraine and MOH are reviewed, including patient education, cognitive behavioral therapy, and biobehavioral training (biofeedback, relaxation training, and stress management). Information regarding psychological comorbidities and risk factors for progression of migraine and the development of MOH is also reviewed. Strategies are provided for enhancing adherence and motivation, as well as facilitating medical communication.