Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 145
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0247781, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651806

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of sacroiliac region pain is supported by a positive response to sacroiliac region analgesia (SIRA). Varying techniques have been described for SIRA; with clinician preference often dictating method. Potential complications following SIRA include ataxia and recumbency. No study has specifically evaluated the prevalence of complications. OBJECTIVES: To describe the complication prevalence following SIRA in a referral clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Review of records from horses presented to two of the authors at Rossdales, Newmarket, between January 2014 and December 2018, that underwent SIRA. Injection was performed using a blind midline approach with 20 mL mepivacaine (Intra-Epicaine 20mg/ml; Dechra) infiltrated through a straight 18 gauge 8.9cm spinal needle subdivided into four sub-locations per block. RESULTS: 118 horses were included, with 167 individual blocks. One horse showed a mild hindlimb gait abnormality following SIRA, which resolved uneventfully over 3 hours; complication rate 1/118 horses (0.85%; 95% CI: 0,2.5%), 1/167 joints (0.60%; 95% CI: 0,1.8%). SIRA subjectively improved lameness/performance in 132/167 (79%) joints. 49/118 (42%) received bilateral SIRA with 53/118 (45%) evaluated ridden following SIRA. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Small population numbers with low complication prevalence rate. CONCLUSIONS: SIRA, using the described technique, has a low (0.85%) prevalence of complications.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/veterinária , Marcha Atáxica/veterinária , Doenças dos Cavalos/tratamento farmacológico , Coxeadura Animal/tratamento farmacológico , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/veterinária , Articulação Sacroilíaca/fisiopatologia , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Animais , Marcha Atáxica/induzido quimicamente , Cavalos , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Mepivacaína/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Neuroradiology ; 62(9): 1185-1187, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32363483

RESUMO

Cervical nerve root infiltrations are frequently performed in patients with radiculopathy, and computed tomography (CT) is commonly used for image guidance. With the traditional anterolateral approach, catastrophic side events due to spinal ischemia have been reported. To minimize risk, a dorsal approach has been advised, but the safety of this dorsal approach has not been studied systematically. In a 5-year period, 137 cervical nerve root infiltrations using a dorsal approach were performed on 109 patients and retrospectively reviewed. In our series, no major complications like spinal ischemia, spondylodiscitis, large hematomas with the need for surgery or severe allergic reactions occurred. In conclusion, using a dorsal approach, CT-guided cervical nerve root infiltrations with an extraforaminal needle position seem to be a safe intervention.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Cervicalgia/tratamento farmacológico , Radiculopatia/tratamento farmacológico , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Raízes Nervosas Espinhais/efeitos dos fármacos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Meios de Contraste , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Iopamidol/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31776012

RESUMO

ANTECEDENTS AND OBJECTIVE: Local infiltrations are second line therapy in the treatment of chronic low back pain, although their use is controversial in the literature. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of 2 types of infiltration at the paravertebral lumbar level in two groups of patients diagnosed with low back pain: corticosteroids, and selective local anaesthetic administered using segmental neural therapy (SNT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Double-blind clinical trial in 55 patients diagnosed with low back pain in the neurosurgery department of the Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla. Patients were randomised to 2 treatment groups to receive either paravertebral injections of corticosteroids or SNT. Outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Short Form-36, and patient satisfaction at the start of treatment (baseline) and at 3 and 12 months post intervention. RESULTS: The combined treatment group showed a statistically significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index at 3 months. The SNT group showed a statistically significant improvement in baseline visual analogue scale vs. visual analogue scale at 3 (1.398cm, p=0.001) and 12 months (0.791cm, p=0.007). No differences were observed in the remaining variables measured. The percentage of patients that would repeat the treatment was 81% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant pain relief was achieved with SNT, and disability improved with the combined treatment. Although clinical improvement was limited, patients were satisfied. Local infiltrations should be considered as an alternative treatment for chronic low back pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at the European Union Clinical Trials Register with EUDRA-CT number 2015-001146-29.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Local/métodos , Raquianestesia/métodos , Dor Crônica/terapia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Betametasona/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor , Medição da Dor/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Complexo Vitamínico B/administração & dosagem
4.
Vet Surg ; 49 Suppl 1: O54-O59, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31225655

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare pain-related responses in mares receiving topical or injected anesthesia of the ovarian pedicle prior to standing unilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study. ANIMALS: Fifteen healthy research mares. METHODS: Mares were restrained in stocks and administered sedation. A right or left paralumbar ovariectomy was performed by using a laparoscopic portal and two instrument portals. Mares were divided into two treatment groups, and equal volumes of mepivacaine anesthesia were administered either topically (n = 8) or by injection into the ovarian pedicle (n = 7). Saline controls were simultaneously administered topically (n = 7) or by injection (n = 8), and surgeons were blinded to the treatment group. Ovarian removal was performed with traumatic forceps and a blunt tip vessel sealer and divider. Pain responses were measured by operative visual analog scale (VAS) scoring and perioperative serum cortisol response. Visual analog scale and serum cortisol were compared between groups by using Mann-Whitney testing. Serum cortisol concentrations were evaluated using repeated-measures one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Ovaries were removed in all mares by using the described technique without operative complications. Quantity of sedation required to complete the procedure, operative VAS scores, and perioperative cortisol concentrations did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Application of topical mepivacaine to the ovary provided intraoperative analgesia similar to injection of the ovarian pedicle when performing unilateral standing laparoscopic ovariectomy in mares. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Topical anesthesia application to the ovary could provide an alternative to laparoscopic needle use, reducing the risk of inadvertent trauma to the pedicle or other visceral organs during laparoscopic ovariectomy.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/veterinária , Cavalos/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/veterinária , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Ovariectomia/veterinária , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/farmacologia , Animais , Feminino , Laparoscopia/métodos , Mepivacaína/farmacologia , Ovariectomia/métodos , Ovário/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 19(1): 195, 2019 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31455285

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The subconjunctival anesthesia with local anesthetics is considered as a low-risk procedure allowing ocular surgery without serious complications typical for retro- or parabulbar anesthesia, especially in patients with preexisting Optic Nerve damage. We report development of ipsilateral transient amaurosis accompanied with mydriasis and both, direct and consensual light response absence. CASE PRESENTATION: Three patients with advanced refractory glaucoma undergoing laser cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) for intraocular pressure lowering experienced these adverse effects just few minutes after subconjunctival injection of mepivacaine 2% solution (Scandicaine® 2%, without vasoconstrictor supplementation). The vision was completely recovered to usual values in up to 20 h after mepivacaine application. Extensive ophthalmological examination, including cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealed no further ocular abnormalities, especially no vascular constriction or thrombotic signs as well as no retinal detachment. The oculomotor function remained intact. The blockade of ipsilateral ciliary ganglion parasympathetic fibers by mepivacaine may be the responsible mechanism. Systemic pathways as drug-drug interactions seem to be unlikely involved. Importantly, all three patients tolerated the same procedure previously or at a later date without any complication. Overall, our thoroughly elaborated risk management could not determine the causative factor explaining the observed ocular complications just in the current occasion and not at other time points. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors should be aware and patients should be informed about such rare complications after subconjunctival local anesthetics administration. Adequate risk management should insure patients' safety.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Cegueira/induzido quimicamente , Túnica Conjuntiva/efeitos dos fármacos , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/cirurgia , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Midríase/induzido quimicamente , Distúrbios Pupilares/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Cegueira/fisiopatologia , Corpo Ciliar/cirurgia , Humanos , Injeções Intraoculares , Pressão Intraocular , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Midríase/fisiopatologia , Distúrbios Pupilares/fisiopatologia
6.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 32(2): 179-185, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30322458

RESUMO

Local anesthetics are used for performing various regional anesthesia techniques to provide intraoperative anesthesia and analgesia, as well as for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. Older medications such as lidocaine and bupivacaine as well as newer ones such as mepivacaine and ropivacaine are being used successfully for decades. Routes of administration include neuraxial, perineural, intravenous, various infiltrative approaches, topical, and transdermal. There are new innovations with the use of older local anesthetics in a novel manner, in addition to the development and use of new formulations. This chapter seeks to summarize the pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics and address the role of newer local anesthetics, as well as clinical implications, safety profiles, and the future of local anesthetic research. Finally, some clinical pearls are highlighted.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/tendências , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/metabolismo , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/metabolismo , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Humanos , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/metabolismo , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/metabolismo , Procaína/administração & dosagem , Procaína/análogos & derivados , Procaína/metabolismo , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Sódio/metabolismo
7.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 56(8): 744-749, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30143396

RESUMO

Local anaesthesia in dentistry is usually given by conventional injection through a syringe. In this randomised, single-blind, split-mouth clinical study we evaluated the perception of pain and changes in heart rate in children being given dental local anaesthesia using a computer-controlled device compared with that given using a traditional syringe. Participants were in good general health with no contraindications to local anaesthetics. One half of each maxilla was anaesthetised using each technique, the order having been randomly selected according to a computer-generated sequence. The hypothesis was that the controlled anaesthetic flow rate results in virtually imperceptible injections. The outcomes were the perception of pain and the heart rate. Seventy-six children aged from 5-12 years old participated in this study. The mean (SD) pain score of the conventional injection was 5.51 (2.46) and the mean (SD) heart rate was 2.72 (6.76), which were significantly higher than those of the computerised delivery system, which were 4.74 (2.8) and 0.34 (7.3) (p=0.04). More patients anaesthetised with the traditional syringe technique required a second injection (n=21). These results suggest that dental anaesthesia given to children with a computer-controlled delivery system reduced pain better than that given with a conventional syringe.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico/prevenção & controle , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/métodos , Quimioterapia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Dor Facial/prevenção & controle , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
G Chir ; 39(4): 227-231, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039790

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the advantage of peribulbar anesthesia in two quadrants (infero-temporal and upper nasal) vs single injection technique (infero-temporal) for scleral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery (RRD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 57 patients, aged between 33 and 75 years (57.01 ± 8.68), waiting for retinal detachment surgery, were randomized in two groups: a group S (29 patients), with single quadrant injection technique and a group C (28 patients) with two quadrants injection. Patients in Group S were injected in two quadrants with a 10 ml mixture containing Mepivacaine 2% 5 ml and Ropivacaine 0.75% 5 ml, with hyaluronidase 10 IU/ ml. Patients in group C were injected with the same anesthetic mixture in one quadrant. Number of additional injection, during surgery, in two groups, were reported. Pain was tested with VAS (Verbal Analogue Scale 0-10) after regional block, when muscles were insulated, during scleral buckling positioning, when conjunctive was closed and 6, 12, 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The need for a second peribulbar injection of anesthetic occurred in 9 patients of group C (32.14%); further injection was necessary in 1 patient (3.57%) of group S during scleral buckling (VAS = 7), statistically significant (p <0.05). Postoperative VAS 6 - 12 - 24 hours after surgery was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The peribulbar anesthesia may be proposed in scleral surgery of retinal detachment; the injection in two quadrants secured solid and satisfactory anesthesia, increasing the outcome of retinal surgery in loco-regional anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Injeções Intraoculares/métodos , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera , Adulto , Idoso , Dor Ocular/etiologia , Dor Ocular/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Ropivacaina/administração & dosagem
9.
Eur J Paediatr Dent ; 19(1): 40-43, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29569452

RESUMO

AIM: The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of the STA Wand System with respect to pain and fear reduction in paediatric patients and by using the Single Tooth Anaesthesia (STA) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients included children and teenagers between 6 and 17 years of age, who required the administration of local anaesthesia prior to expected treatments. Local anaesthesia was performed by means of the electronic STA Wand System (Milestone scientific., Inc.) adopting the Single Tooth Anaesthesia (STA) technique. Pre- and post-anaesthesia, the patients were asked to complete the Wong-Baker faces image scale and the provider filled in the Frankl Scale. RESULTS: All treatments were completed successfully and no collaboration issues were recorded. Frankl's assessment showed that 91% of patients regarded dental experience positively. The efficacy of the computer-assisted anaesthesia was at 100% when treating primary teeth, and 70% for procedures on permanent teeth. Almost the totality of treated patients (94%) gave a positive evaluation after having tried the device with STA technique. Only 6% of the patients assessed the procedure negatively. CONCLUSIONS: The STA technique allows for absence of anticipatory anxiety, absence of physical pain, no anaesthetic effects in the perioral tissues and a controllable, lower dosage of the anaesthetic liquid.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/instrumentação , Anestesia Local/instrumentação , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Injeções/instrumentação , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Criança , Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Vet J ; 223: 27-31, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28671067

RESUMO

Lameness is the most commonly reported health problem in horses, and lameness investigations which include local anaesthetic injections are routinely performed by equine practitioners. Through this process, bacteria can enter the tissues perforated by the needle and may cause local infections at the injection site. The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate if local anaesthetics at concentrations available in commercially available solutions could inhibit growth and/or kill bacteria that could be inoculated into the synovial space or soft tissues during injection. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of the local anaesthetics bupivacaine, lidocaine and mepivacaine against 40 equine clinical bacterial isolates of the Actinobacillus, Corynebacterium, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus genera. Minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MICs and MBCs) were determined by the broth microdilution method. Clinically applied concentrations of bupivacaine, lidocaine, and mepivacaine inhibited visual growth of 93%, 93%, and 80% of isolates tested, respectively. For the majority (80%) of the inhibited isolates, the concentrations were also bactericidal. The tested local anaesthetics possessed antimicrobial activity against equine pathogens at concentrations that are routinely applied in clinical cases. However, this antimicrobial activity should not discourage antiseptic preparation prior to local anaesthetic injections.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais , Antibacterianos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Doenças dos Cavalos/microbiologia , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Animais , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Doenças dos Cavalos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Cavalos/etiologia , Cavalos , Coxeadura Animal/fisiopatologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/veterinária , Dor/tratamento farmacológico
11.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 55(5): 465-470, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28460873

RESUMO

The aim was to analyse the short-term and long-term therapeutic efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy for dislocation or subluxation (hypermobility) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Sixty-one patients with symptomatic hypermobility of the TMJ were included in this single-arm prospective study, in which they were each given four sessions of intra-articular and pericapsular injections six weeks apart. Each injection comprised 10% dextrose/mepivacaine solution 3ml. Clinical outcomes including severity of pain on movement according to the numerical rating scale (NRS), maximal interincisal opening, clicking, and frequency of locking were measured before treatment (T1), during treatment (T2) (just before the third session of injections), at the short-term follow-up (T3) (three months after treatment), and at the long-term follow-up (T4) (1-4 years after treatment). Condylar translation and osseous changes of each joint were evaluated at T1 and T4 using tomography. There was significant reduction in all variables by T2 (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.006, and p<0.001). The pain scores (p<0.001) and clicking (p<0.001) had decreased significantly by T3. Linear tomograms of each joint at T1 and T4 showed no alteration in the morphology of the bony components of the joint, and at T4, tomographic open views of all joints showed condylar hypertranslation. Dextrose prolotherapy provided significant and sustained reduction of pain and recovery of constitutional symptoms associated with symptomatic hypermobility of the TMJ without changing either the position of the condyle or the morphology of the bony components of the joint.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Glucose/uso terapêutico , Luxações Articulares/tratamento farmacológico , Instabilidade Articular/tratamento farmacológico , Mepivacaína/uso terapêutico , Proloterapia/métodos , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glucose/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Quintessence Int ; 47(9): 797-802, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27446999

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pain experienced by patients during injections of local anesthesia in the palate using the traditional syringe and the controlled flow technique with the Calaject system. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial was performed. Twenty-five volunteers were recruited in the Dental Hospital of the University of Barcelona, Spain. Each participant received two injections (0.3 mL of mepivacaine 3%), one with the traditional syringe (control side) and another with the Calaject system (experimental side), both during the same session. Pain intensity was evaluated after each injection with a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). A descriptive and bivariate statistical analysis was made. RESULTS: The mean pain experienced was 44.8 mm (standard deviation [SD] 19.0, range 8-72) with the traditional injection and 28.8 mm (SD 19.7, range 8-72) with the Calaject system (P < .001). Moderate/severe pain was more frequently referred in the control side (68%) in comparison with the experimental side (28%). CONCLUSION: Given the parameters of this study's design, the injection of local anesthetics in the palatal area with the Calaject controlled-flow system seems to reduce pain, in comparison to the use of a traditional syringe.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Dentária/instrumentação , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/instrumentação , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Palato , Terapia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções/efeitos adversos , Injeções/instrumentação , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Método Simples-Cego , Espanha , Seringas
13.
SAAD Dig ; 32: 7-13, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27145553

RESUMO

AIM: To review the current teaching of the use and administration of local anaesthesia in United Kingdom dental schools, along with their local guidelines and protocols. METHODS: A qualitative and quantitative questionnaire was sent to sixteen UK dental schools to probe the methods of local anaesthetic teaching within each school. RESULTS: 14 of the 16 schools replied and the responses show a variety of practices being taught in the dental schools. 2% Lidocaine 1:80,000 Adrenaline is the first choice local anaesthetic solution for the majority of clinical situations. CONCLUSION: 2% Lidocaine with 1:80,000 Adrenaline remains the gold standard dental local anaesthetic with teaching about its safety and uses in all but a few situations. Most are taught the use of additional aids such as safety syringes and topical anaesthesia. There is variation with regards to the use of alternative anaesthetic agents.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestesiologia/educação , Educação em Odontologia , Faculdades de Odontologia , Adulto , Anatomia/educação , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Carticaína/administração & dosagem , Criança , Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Farmacologia/educação , Prilocaína/administração & dosagem , Segurança , Inquéritos e Questionários , Seringas , Ensino/métodos , Livros de Texto como Assunto , Reino Unido , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem
14.
PLoS One ; 10(6): e0129006, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26046784

RESUMO

Katakori is a symptom name that is unique to Japan, and refers to myofascial pain syndrome-like clinical signs in the shoulder girdle. Various methods of pain relief for katakori have been reported, but in the present study, we examined the clinical effects of multi-acupuncture point injections (MAPI) in the acupuncture points with which we empirically achieved an effect, as well as the anatomical sites affected by liquid medicine. The subjects were idiopathic katakori patients (n = 9), and three cadavers for anatomical investigation. BL-10, GB-21, LI-16, SI-14, and BL-38 as the WHO notation were selected as the acupuncture point. Injections of 1 mL of 1% w/v mepivacaine were introduced at the same time into each of these points in the patients. Assessment items were the Pain Relief Score and the therapeutic effect period. Dissections were centered at the puncture sites of cadavers. India ink was similarly injected into each point, and each site that was darkly-stained with India ink was evaluated. Katakori pain in the present study was significantly reduced by MAPI. Regardless of the presence or absence of trigger points, pain was significantly reduced in these cases. Dark staining with India ink at each of the points in the anatomical analysis was as follows: BL-10: over the rectus capitis posterior minor muscle and rectus capitis posterior major muscle fascia; GB-21: over the supraspinatus muscle fascia; LI-16: over the supraspinatus muscle fascia; SI-14: over the rhomboid muscle fascia; and BL-38: over the rhomboid muscle fascia. The anatomical study suggested that the drug effect was exerted on the muscles above and below the muscle fascia, as well as the peripheral nerves because the points of action in acupuncture were darkly-stained in the spaces between the muscle and the muscle fascia.


Assuntos
Pontos de Acupuntura , Terapia por Acupuntura , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Cervicalgia/terapia , Dor de Ombro/terapia , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Masculino , Mepivacaína/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
15.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 73(7): 1267-74, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25900233

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative effectiveness of stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) versus xenon light irradiation (XLI) for the treatment of neurosensory deficits resulting from orthognathic surgery as determined by a comparison of prospective measurements of electrical current perception thresholds (CPTs) and ranged CPTs (R-CPTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CPT and R-CPT in the mental foramen area were measured during electrical stimulation at 98 different sites on the body in patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery. After surgery, patients were assigned to the SGB group or the XLI group. CPT and R-CPT of the 2 groups were measured at stimulation frequencies of 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and after 10 treatment sessions. Furthermore, the influence of surgical factors, such as genioplasty and a surgically exposed inferior alveolar nerve (IAN), was examined in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients' CPT and R-CPT values indicated a considerable amount of sensory disturbance in most cases after surgery. The change in magnitude of all CPT and R-CPT values for the SGB group decreased considerably compared with that for the XLI group after treatment. There was no correlation between CPT or R-CPT values and surgical factors (eg, genioplasty and exposure of the IAN). CONCLUSION: SGB of the IAN could be an effective method for treating neurosensory deficits after orthognathic surgery on the IAN.


Assuntos
Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ortognáticos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Distúrbios Somatossensoriais/terapia , Gânglio Estrelado/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mentoplastia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Nervo Mandibular/efeitos dos fármacos , Nervo Mandibular/fisiopatologia , Nervo Mandibular/efeitos da radiação , Maxila/cirurgia , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/fisiologia , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/efeitos da radiação , Osteotomia de Le Fort/efeitos adversos , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/radioterapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Limiar Sensorial/fisiologia , Distúrbios Somatossensoriais/radioterapia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Interv Neuroradiol ; 20(5): 533-7, 2014 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25363255

RESUMO

Selective nerve root infiltrations are frequently performed in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Computed tomography (CT) is now commonly used for image guidance. Despite the widespread use of CT-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations few studies have systematically examined the safety of this approach. In a two-year period, 231 lumbar nerve root infiltrations were performed on in-patients and were retrospectively reviewed. No major complications like inflammation (especially spondylodiscitis), large haematomas requiring surgery, severe allergic reactions or spinal ischaemia occurred. In accordance with other published studies, CT-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations seem to be safe. To minimize the risk of catastrophic neurological complications due to spinal ischaemia, careful needle placement dorsal to the nerve root and the use of a non-particulate corticosteroid, like dexamethasone, are advocated.


Assuntos
Neuronavegação/métodos , Raízes Nervosas Espinhais/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Mepivacaína/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol ; 27(5): 351-7, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25213031

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the specificity of anaesthesia of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve (DB-LPN). METHODS: Twenty horses had DB-LPN anaesthesia performed by a single injection technique as part of a lameness investigation. The mechanical nociceptive threshold (NT) was measured using a handheld force meter at six points on the lateral aspect of the limb: before diagnostic anaesthesia (T0), and at 15 (T15) and 30 (T30) minutes post anaesthesia. Paired t-tests were performed and significance was set at p <0.05. In addition, ten cadaveric limbs were injected with 2.5 ml new methylene blue solution using a single injection technique to evaluate the extent of dye diffusion within the proximal metatarsal region. RESULTS: Compared with T0, there was a significant decrease in NT for all points combined at T15 (p = 0.008) and also at T30 (p = 0.007). There was a significant decrease in NT at T15 on the lateral third metatarsal bone (p = 0.012). At T30 there was a significant decrease in NT at the lateral sesamoid (p = 0.007), lateral third metatarsal bone (p = 0.031), and mid metatarsus (p = 0.033). Four out of 20 horses had a NT greater than 10 N at the lateral heel bulb at T30. In the cadaveric limbs, the total diffusion distance for all limbs (mean ± SD) was 70.4 ± 20.5 mm. Dye surrounded the DB-LPN in all limbs and the lateral plantar nerve (LPN) in nine out of 10 limbs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Concurrent anaesthesia of the LPN is likely to occur when DB-LPN anaesthesia is performed using a single injection technique.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/veterinária , Doenças dos Cavalos/diagnóstico , Mepivacaína/farmacologia , Metatarso/patologia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor/veterinária , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/farmacologia , Animais , Cadáver , Corantes , Feminino , Membro Posterior/patologia , Cavalos , Injeções , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Dor/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor/veterinária
18.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 71(5): 960-3, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25017575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Varicose veins are treated under local infiltration anesthesia. Literature shows that adding sodium bicarbonate reduces the pain associated with local infiltration anesthesia. Nonetheless, sodium bicarbonate is underused. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess if the use of a solution of mepivacaine 2% plus adrenaline with sodium bicarbonate 1.4% results in less pain associated with local infiltration anesthesia preceding ambulatory phlebectomies, compared with standard preparation diluted with normal saline. METHODS: In all, 100 adult patients undergoing scheduled ambulatory phlebectomy were randomized to receive either a solution of mepivacaine chlorhydrate 2% plus adrenaline in sodium bicarbonate 1.4% or a similar solution diluted in normal saline 0.9%. RESULTS: Median pain scores associated with local infiltration anesthesia reported in the intervention and control groups were 2 (SD=1.6) and 5 (SD=2.0) (P<.0001), respectively. A general linear model with bootstrapped confidence intervals showed that using the alkalinized solution would lead to a reduction in pain rating of about 3 points. LIMITATIONS: Patients were not asked to distinguish the pain of the needle stick from the pain of the infiltration. Moreover, a complete clinical study of sensitivity on the infiltrated area was not conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained from this study may contribute to improve local infiltration anesthesia in ambulatory phlebectomy and other phlebologic procedures.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Dor/prevenção & controle , Bicarbonato de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Varizes/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Soluções Isotônicas , Masculino , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Medição da Dor , Cloreto de Sódio , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem
20.
Scand J Urol ; 48(4): 374-8, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24521182

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate cell kill accuracy and responder rate when using injections of intraprostatic mepivacaine and adrenaline (MA) before high-energy microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective evaluation encompassed 283 treatments in men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. They were treated consecutively during 2003-2008 using HE-TUMT with a feedback technique. Immediately before treatment, MA was administered into the prostate via a Schelin Catheter®. Clinical outcome was evaluated 3 months after treatment using a validated symptom score, transrectal ultrasound, peak urinary flow and postvoid residual. RESULTS: Systematic underestimation of the resulting coagulation necrosis was a consistent finding when using MA, a calculated cell kill of 21% yielding a volume reduction of 26% for prostate volumes less than 100 ml and 31% for prostate volumes greater than or equal to 100 ml. Mean prostate volume was 74 ml and mean treatment time was 13 min. Less than 1% of the patients needed analgesics or sedatives on demand. Analysis of the data showed an estimated clinical responder rate of approximately 87%. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting prostate volume reduction corresponds to the earlier empirically recommended 30% cell kill for CoreTherm® without MA. The treatment concept combining CoreTherm with intraprostatic injections of MA corresponds to the clinical outcome of thermotherapy without MA, with the benefits of reduced pain, shortened treatment time and decreased energy consumption.


Assuntos
Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Mepivacaína/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Retenção Urinária/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Morte Celular , Terapia Combinada , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Próstata/patologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Retenção Urinária/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA