Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0247781, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651806

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of sacroiliac region pain is supported by a positive response to sacroiliac region analgesia (SIRA). Varying techniques have been described for SIRA; with clinician preference often dictating method. Potential complications following SIRA include ataxia and recumbency. No study has specifically evaluated the prevalence of complications. OBJECTIVES: To describe the complication prevalence following SIRA in a referral clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Review of records from horses presented to two of the authors at Rossdales, Newmarket, between January 2014 and December 2018, that underwent SIRA. Injection was performed using a blind midline approach with 20 mL mepivacaine (Intra-Epicaine 20mg/ml; Dechra) infiltrated through a straight 18 gauge 8.9cm spinal needle subdivided into four sub-locations per block. RESULTS: 118 horses were included, with 167 individual blocks. One horse showed a mild hindlimb gait abnormality following SIRA, which resolved uneventfully over 3 hours; complication rate 1/118 horses (0.85%; 95% CI: 0,2.5%), 1/167 joints (0.60%; 95% CI: 0,1.8%). SIRA subjectively improved lameness/performance in 132/167 (79%) joints. 49/118 (42%) received bilateral SIRA with 53/118 (45%) evaluated ridden following SIRA. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Small population numbers with low complication prevalence rate. CONCLUSIONS: SIRA, using the described technique, has a low (0.85%) prevalence of complications.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/veterinária , Marcha Atáxica/veterinária , Doenças dos Cavalos/tratamento farmacológico , Coxeadura Animal/tratamento farmacológico , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/veterinária , Articulação Sacroilíaca/fisiopatologia , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Animais , Marcha Atáxica/induzido quimicamente , Cavalos , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Mepivacaína/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 19(1): 195, 2019 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31455285

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The subconjunctival anesthesia with local anesthetics is considered as a low-risk procedure allowing ocular surgery without serious complications typical for retro- or parabulbar anesthesia, especially in patients with preexisting Optic Nerve damage. We report development of ipsilateral transient amaurosis accompanied with mydriasis and both, direct and consensual light response absence. CASE PRESENTATION: Three patients with advanced refractory glaucoma undergoing laser cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) for intraocular pressure lowering experienced these adverse effects just few minutes after subconjunctival injection of mepivacaine 2% solution (Scandicaine® 2%, without vasoconstrictor supplementation). The vision was completely recovered to usual values in up to 20 h after mepivacaine application. Extensive ophthalmological examination, including cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealed no further ocular abnormalities, especially no vascular constriction or thrombotic signs as well as no retinal detachment. The oculomotor function remained intact. The blockade of ipsilateral ciliary ganglion parasympathetic fibers by mepivacaine may be the responsible mechanism. Systemic pathways as drug-drug interactions seem to be unlikely involved. Importantly, all three patients tolerated the same procedure previously or at a later date without any complication. Overall, our thoroughly elaborated risk management could not determine the causative factor explaining the observed ocular complications just in the current occasion and not at other time points. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors should be aware and patients should be informed about such rare complications after subconjunctival local anesthetics administration. Adequate risk management should insure patients' safety.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Cegueira/induzido quimicamente , Túnica Conjuntiva/efeitos dos fármacos , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/cirurgia , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Midríase/induzido quimicamente , Distúrbios Pupilares/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Cegueira/fisiopatologia , Corpo Ciliar/cirurgia , Humanos , Injeções Intraoculares , Pressão Intraocular , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Midríase/fisiopatologia , Distúrbios Pupilares/fisiopatologia
3.
Interv Neuroradiol ; 20(5): 533-7, 2014 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25363255

RESUMO

Selective nerve root infiltrations are frequently performed in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Computed tomography (CT) is now commonly used for image guidance. Despite the widespread use of CT-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations few studies have systematically examined the safety of this approach. In a two-year period, 231 lumbar nerve root infiltrations were performed on in-patients and were retrospectively reviewed. No major complications like inflammation (especially spondylodiscitis), large haematomas requiring surgery, severe allergic reactions or spinal ischaemia occurred. In accordance with other published studies, CT-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations seem to be safe. To minimize the risk of catastrophic neurological complications due to spinal ischaemia, careful needle placement dorsal to the nerve root and the use of a non-particulate corticosteroid, like dexamethasone, are advocated.


Assuntos
Neuronavegação/métodos , Raízes Nervosas Espinhais/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Mepivacaína/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 71(5): 960-3, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25017575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Varicose veins are treated under local infiltration anesthesia. Literature shows that adding sodium bicarbonate reduces the pain associated with local infiltration anesthesia. Nonetheless, sodium bicarbonate is underused. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess if the use of a solution of mepivacaine 2% plus adrenaline with sodium bicarbonate 1.4% results in less pain associated with local infiltration anesthesia preceding ambulatory phlebectomies, compared with standard preparation diluted with normal saline. METHODS: In all, 100 adult patients undergoing scheduled ambulatory phlebectomy were randomized to receive either a solution of mepivacaine chlorhydrate 2% plus adrenaline in sodium bicarbonate 1.4% or a similar solution diluted in normal saline 0.9%. RESULTS: Median pain scores associated with local infiltration anesthesia reported in the intervention and control groups were 2 (SD=1.6) and 5 (SD=2.0) (P<.0001), respectively. A general linear model with bootstrapped confidence intervals showed that using the alkalinized solution would lead to a reduction in pain rating of about 3 points. LIMITATIONS: Patients were not asked to distinguish the pain of the needle stick from the pain of the infiltration. Moreover, a complete clinical study of sensitivity on the infiltrated area was not conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained from this study may contribute to improve local infiltration anesthesia in ambulatory phlebectomy and other phlebologic procedures.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Dor/prevenção & controle , Bicarbonato de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Varizes/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Soluções Isotônicas , Masculino , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Medição da Dor , Cloreto de Sódio , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem
5.
J Craniofac Surg ; 25(1): e9-12, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24275775

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular effects of epinephrine, especially on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), have been well documented. When present in dental local anesthetic solutions, epinephrine concentration ranges from 5 to 20 µg/mL. Doses less than 200 µg are recommended to be clinically safe. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effects of the anesthetic solution of mepivacaine (2%) with epinephrine (10 µg/mL) in cardiovascular activity (HR and BP). METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent outpatient surgery for the removal of 2 unilateral (group I, n = 15) or 4 (group II, n = 11) third molars in a single session, being injected 5.4 and 10.8 mL of anesthetic solution, equivalent to 54 and 108 µg of epinephrine, respectively. The cardiovascular activity was monitored by cardioscope during the experimental period of 2 hours. Heart rate and BP were measured at the intervals of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after anesthetic injection. RESULTS: After application of 2-way analysis of variance test, comparison between groups was not statistically significant for HR (P = 0.1388), systolic BP (P = 0.0228), and diastolic BP (P = 0.9846). However, patients from group II presented significantly greater sway in HR (P < 0.0001), systolic BP (P = 0.0169), and diastolic BP (P < 0.0001) in the course of 2 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure did not present significant alterations after a local injection of 54 or 108 µg of epinephrine during surgery to remove 2 or 4 third molars. Although without significance, HR was more elevated in the 108-µg dose of epinephrine during the removal of 4 third molars.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Epinefrina/efeitos adversos , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Dente Serotino/cirurgia , Extração Dentária , Adolescente , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Korean Med Sci ; 27(6): 707-10, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22690107

RESUMO

The mechanism of chronic pain is very complicated. Memory, pain, and opioid dependence appear to share common mechanism, including synaptic plasticity, and anatomical structures. A 48-yr-old woman with severe pain caused by bone metastasis of breast cancer received epidural block. After local anesthetics were injected, she had a seizure and then went into cardiac arrest. Following cardiopulmonary resuscitation, her cardiac rhythm returned to normal, but her memory had disappeared. Also, her excruciating pain and opioid dependence had disappeared. This complication, although uncommon, gives us a lot to think about a role of memory for chronic pain and opioid dependence.


Assuntos
Amnésia/diagnóstico , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Manejo da Dor , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca/etiologia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Convulsões/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
7.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-21955

RESUMO

The mechanism of chronic pain is very complicated. Memory, pain, and opioid dependence appear to share common mechanism, including synaptic plasticity, and anatomical structures. A 48-yr-old woman with severe pain caused by bone metastasis of breast cancer received epidural block. After local anesthetics were injected, she had a seizure and then went into cardiac arrest. Following cardiopulmonary resuscitation, her cardiac rhythm returned to normal, but her memory had disappeared. Also, her excruciating pain and opioid dependence had disappeared. This complication, although uncommon, gives us a lot to think about a role of memory for chronic pain and opioid dependence.


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Amnésia/diagnóstico , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Eletroencefalografia , Parada Cardíaca/etiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor , Convulsões/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
8.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 249(12): 1831-5, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21850439

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe postoperative loss of vision has been occasionally reported as a rare complication of retrobulbar anesthesia, and several possible causes have been proposed in the literature. In this work, our own and other investigators' experiences with these complications are surveyed with a view to identifying its pathophysiology. PATIENTS: This observational case series refers to six patients who presented during a 3-month period with occlusion of either the central artery itself (n = 3) or a branch thereof (n = 3) 2-14 days after uneventful vitreoretinal surgery following retrobulbar anesthesia with a commercial preparation of mepivacaine (1% Scandicain®, Astra Chemicals, Sweden) containing methyl- and propyl parahydroxybenzoate as preservatives. RESULTS: Three of the patients carried risk factors, which were medically controlled. In three individuals, vasoocclusion was observed after a second vitreoretinal intervention, which was performed 3-12 months after uneventful primary surgery. Good visual recovery was observed in only one instance. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who were anesthetized with preservative-free mepivacaine, no vasoocclusion occurred. In individuals who were anesthetized with mepivacaine containing the preservatives methyl- and propyl parahydroxybenzoate, a tenfold increase in the incidence of eyes requiring re-operation was documented, with a 2- to 14-day lapse in the onset of vasoocclusion. These findings reveal a possible implication of preservatives contained in the local anesthetic solution for the vasoocclusive events. Due to this potential hazard, the use of preservative-free preparations of local anesthesia in ocular surgery is emphasized in order to prevent this sight-threatening complication.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Parabenos/efeitos adversos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana/induzido quimicamente , Vitrectomia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Membrana Epirretiniana/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órbita , Parabenos/administração & dosagem , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Hemorragia Vítrea/cirurgia
9.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 65(10): 975-8, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21120297

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to (1) observe the extent to which hemodynamic and glucose measurements change in patients submitted to a dental procedure with and without a local anesthetic and a vasoconstrictor (LAVA; 2% mepivacaine with adrenaline 1100,000) and (2) correlate those parameters with the patients' anxiety levels. METHOD: This was an unblinded, random, prospective, and observational study with paired groups. Patients were evaluated during two different consultations during which they either did or did not receive a local anesthetic/vasoconstrictor. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients ranging in age from 18 to 45 years (mean 30.4 ± 5.5 years) were evaluated. Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and glucose levels, did not change significantly in healthy patients, regardless of whether a LAVA was administered during the dental treatment. CONCLUSION: The patients' anxiety statuses neither varied significantly nor showed any correlation with the studied hemodynamic parameters and glucose levels, regardless of whether local anesthetics were used.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Glicemia/análise , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico/metabolismo , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Epinefrina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
10.
Clinics ; 65(10): 975-978, 2010. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-565980

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to (1) observe the extent to which hemodynamic and glucose measurements change in patients submitted to a dental procedure with and without a local anesthetic and a vasoconstrictor (LAVA; 2 percent mepivacaine with adrenaline 1100,000) and (2) correlate those parameters with the patients' anxiety levels. METHOD: This was an unblinded, random, prospective, and observational study with paired groups. Patients were evaluated during two different consultations during which they either did or did not receive a local anesthetic/vasoconstrictor. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients ranging in age from 18 to 45 years (mean 30.4 ± 5.5 years) were evaluated. Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and glucose levels, did not change significantly in healthy patients, regardless of whether a LAVA was administered during the dental treatment. CONCLUSION: The patients' anxiety statuses neither varied significantly nor showed any correlation with the studied hemodynamic parameters and glucose levels, regardless of whether local anesthetics were used.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Glicemia/análise , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico/metabolismo , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Epinefrina/efeitos adversos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos
12.
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue ; 17(3): 328-31, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18661082

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride injection for oral local anesthesia. METHODS: 68 non-hypertension patients and 36 hypertension patients were randomly divided into 2 groups for local anesthesia. 2% lidocaine with adrenaline in same cartridge was as control group and 3% mepivacaine was as the experimental group. The onset time,duration and pain-free time of 2 anaesthetics were examined. The blood pressure and heart rate change, neural reaction and side effect of 2 groups were observed. SAS software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In the mepivacaine group, the average onset time was 111s, the duration time was 212s and pain-free time was 134 min ,which was similar to those of 2% lidocaine. Immediately after injection, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after injection of anesthesia, and post-operation, there were no significant changes in the systolic blood pressures between 2% lidocaine group and 3% mepivacaine group (P>0.05), but there were significant changes in diastolic blood pressures and heart rate (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: 3% mepivacaine has quick onset, ideal anesthetic effect and little side effect on cardiovascular system.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/farmacologia , Hipertensão , Mepivacaína/farmacologia , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Epinefrina , Humanos , Lidocaína , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Boca
14.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 221(1): 24-8, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14745674

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retro- or peribulbar anaesthesia are the standard procedures for cyclodestructive surgery. Because these methods of anaesthesia may further compromise optic nerve function, especially in advanced glaucoma, subconjunctival anaesthesia was evaluated as an alternative procedure in cyclocryotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1. To evaluate the current methods of anaesthesia a questionnaire was sent to all University Eye Clinics in Germany in 2001. 2. A prospective, consecutive study concerning cyclocryotherapy in advanced glaucoma was started using subconjunctival anaesthesia with 5 % cocaine or, alternatively, 2 % mepivacaine in 25 eyes of 25 patients in each group. Pain during cyclocryotherapy was recorded using a 10-point rating-scale (1 = no pain to 10 = intolerably severe pain) and adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: 1. 88.6 % of the University Eye Clinics in Germany replied to our questionnaire. In 2001 cyclocryotherapy was performed in 80.6 % of the University Eye Clinics in Germany (Tübingen not included), 16.1 % among them solely used cyclocryotherapy for the treatment of advanced glaucoma. 2. Using 5 % cocaine for subconjunctival anaesthesia - 92 % of patients experienced no pain and 8 % of patients reported very mild pain during cyclocryotherapy. One patient reported nausea, 4 patients mouth dryness. After anaesthesia with mepivacaine - 80 % experienced no pain, 12 % very mild pain, and 8 % mild pain. There were no systemic side effects. CONCLUSION: Most of the patients experienced no pain during cyclocryotherapy using subconjunctival anaesthesia with cocaine or mepivacaine. Therefore, risks and side effects of retro- or parabulbar anaesthesia can be successfully avoided by this simple modification.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais , Corpo Ciliar/cirurgia , Cocaína/administração & dosagem , Criocirurgia , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Cocaína/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor
16.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 47(5): 194-7, 2000 May.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10902449

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the duration of spinal block with 5% prilocaine and 2% mepivacaine in short procedures for transurethral resection and to assess possible complications in the immediate postoperative period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate or a vesical tumor. Patients were ASA I-III, over 55 years of age and randomly assigned to two groups to receive 5% prilocaine (1 mg/kg, n = 27) or 2% mepivacaine (0.8 mg/kg, n = 30). We collected data on anesthetic technique, levels of extension of motor and sensory blockades, duration of blockades and complications within the first 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Demographic data, ASA classification and duration of surgery were similar in both groups. We found statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in duration of sensory blockade (120.92 +/- 36.21 min with prilocaine and 145.83 +/- 35.81 min with mepivacaine) and in motor blockade (106.29 +/- 38.16 min with prilocaine and 133.16 +/- 42.21 min with mepivacaine). Five cases of hypotension and 4 of bradycardia occurred in each group and one patient in the mepivacaine group suffered slight postoperative cephalea. CONCLUSIONS: Both local anesthetics offer good surgical conditions with hemodynamic stability and few complications. The duration of sensory and motor blockade is shorter with prilocaine than with mepivacaine, making prilocaine more appropriate for short interventions.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Prilocaína/administração & dosagem , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/efeitos adversos , Bradicardia/induzido quimicamente , Bradicardia/etiologia , Humanos , Hipotensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipotensão/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Prilocaína/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Espaço Subaracnóideo , Decúbito Dorsal , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 43(4): 398-404, 1999 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10225072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High-dose transarterial (TA) technique results in high effectiveness of the axillary block. The technique is fast and simple, but does not produce a satisfactory success rate when using the manufacturer's recommended dose of mepivacaine. The multiple nerve stimulation (MNS) technique requires more time and experience. This double-blind study compared effectiveness, safety and the time used to obtain an effective analgesia in 101 patients, having an axillary block by either TA or MNS techniques. METHODS: Mepivacaine with adrenaline (MEPA), 850 mg, was used for the initial block. Five millilitres of 1% solution was injected subcutaneously. In the TA group, 20 mL of 2% solution was injected deep to, and 20 mL superficial to the axillary artery. In the MNS group, four terminal motor nerves were electrolocated in the axilla, and injected with 10 mL each. Analgesia was assessed every 10 min and, when needed, supplemented after 30 min. The block was effective when analgesia was present in all sensory nerve areas distal to the elbow. RESULTS: The MNS group required median 11 min for block performance compared with 8 min for the TA group (P < 0.001). Latency of the initial block was shorter and the frequency of supplemental analgesia lower in the MNS group (median 10 min and 6%) than in the TA group (30 min and 36%, respectively), P < 0.001. All incomplete blocks were successfully supplemented. However, the total time to obtain an effective block was shorter in the MNS group (23 min) than in the TA group (37 min), P < 0.001. Two patients in each group had signs and symptoms of systemic toxicity, the most serious being atrial fibrillation and temporary loss of consciousness in a cardiovascularly medicated patient. The local adverse effects (intravascular injections and haematomas) were fewer in the MNS group, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The MNS technique of axillary block by four injections of 10 mL of 2% MEPA produces faster and more extensive block than the TA technique by two injections of 20 mL. Therefore, the MNS technique requires fewer supplementary blocks and results in faster patient readiness for surgery. However, high doses of MEPA may result in dangerous systemic toxic reactions.


Assuntos
Agonistas Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Axila/inervação , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Adolescente , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Artéria Axilar , Método Duplo-Cego , Epinefrina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hematoma/etiologia , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurônios Motores/efeitos dos fármacos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Neurônios Aferentes/efeitos dos fármacos , Segurança , Fatores de Tempo , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/efeitos adversos , Inconsciência/etiologia
18.
Br Dent J ; 184(7): 334-5, 1998 Apr 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9599886

RESUMO

Local anaesthetic overdose is not common in dental practice but can occur. In rare cases it can be fatal. Normally the use of good technique employing small amounts of solution limits toxicity. In addition, thorough medical history taking should forewarn the dentist of any patient who has experienced problems in the past and will also alert the operator to those few patients who exhibit idiosyncratic reactions. This article aims to offer practical advice to help avoid local anaesthetic toxicity.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/intoxicação , Peso Corporal , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Overdose de Drogas , Humanos , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Anamnese , Mepivacaína/administração & dosagem , Mepivacaína/efeitos adversos , Prilocaína/administração & dosagem , Prilocaína/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA