Efficacy and tolerability of oral iron protein succinylate: a systematic review of three decades of research.

Objective: Oral supplementation with iron is a standard intervention for treating or preventing iron deficiency with or without anemia. Over the last few decades, various forms of oral iron have been developed to improve treatment tolerability and iron bioavailability. In this review, we gathered research data regarding the use of iron protein succinylate since it was first marketed in the 1980s.Methods: Electronic databases - PubMed and the Cochrane Library - were searched for studies published up to March 2019. Clinical or observational studies reporting data on the tolerability of oral iron protein succinylate were included. Results were statistically described to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of iron protein succinylate with the comparators under study.Results: Iron protein succinylate was investigated in 54 studies: 38 randomized clinical trials and 16 observational studies, with a total of 8454 subjects. Of them, 8142 were included in the efficacy analysis: patients were divided into three population subtypes: general (n = 1899), gynecological/obstetric (n = 5283), and pediatric (n = 960). In total, 6450 patients received iron protein succinylate, experiencing a significant change in hemoglobin and ferritin in all populations. The change in all parameters was similar or higher with iron protein succinylate compared to other iron treatments evaluated. Overall, study groups receiving iron protein succinylate reported the lowest rate of adverse events.Conclusions: Although all iron treatments analyzed are effective and safe, our results suggest that iron protein succinylate may be an excellent choice to treat iron deficiency and anemia due to its superior effectiveness and tolerability.

Tolerability of different oral iron supplements: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was conducted to analyze the tolerability of several oral iron supplements based on data obtained in available publications and to report the incidence of adverse effects (AEs) for each supplement both overall and gastrointestinal. METHODS: Electronic databases - Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for studies published up to January 2009. Clinical or observational studies reporting data on the tolerability of oral iron supplements were included. Results were described statistically and a quasi-binomial logistic regression model was developed to evaluate and compare the tolerability of the supplements studied. RESULTS: For this review 111 studies were included, with data on 10,695 patients. Ferrous sulfate with mucoproteose had the lowest incidence of AEs (4.1% for overall AEs, 3.7% for gastrointestinal AEs [GAEs]) and was used as the reference supplement in the regression model. Incidence rates of overall AEs for the other supplements were 7.3% for iron protein succinylate [GAEs: 7%; OR for AE compared to the reference supplement, 1.96], 23.5% for ferrous glycine sulfate [GAEs: 18.5%; OR: 5.90], 30.9% for ferrous gluconate [GAEs: 29.9%; OR: 11.06], 32.3% for ferrous sulfate without mucoproteose [GAEs: 30.2%; OR: 11.21], and 47.0% for ferrous fumarate [GAEs: 43.4%; OR: 19.87]. The differences in incidence of AEs between extended-release ferrous sulfate with mucoproteose and all other supplements except iron protein succinylate were statistically significant at p < 0.001. These findings are subject to some limitations as the designs and methodologies of the studies included show heterogeneity among them that has partially been counteracted by the large sample size provided by the substantial number of trials, which is considered a strength in tolerability studies. CONCLUSION: Extended-release ferrous sulfate with mucoproteose appears to be the best tolerated of the different oral iron supplements evaluated.

Iron protein succinylate: preclinical safety assessment.

In this brief review the preclinical safety studies on iron protein succinylate (synonym: ITF 282) are presented. Iron protein succinylate is an iron-protein complex, in which iron is present in ferric form. It has been developed for oral iron-supplementation therapy and is characterized by a very favorable tolerability profile. The acute toxicity of iron protein succinylate to rodents is very low, indicating a substantial margin of safety with respect to accidental child poisonings. In chronic toxicity studies of 52-week duration in rats and dogs, there were no findings of toxicological significance. In particular, there were no alterations in hematological parameters and no histopathological findings consistent with iron overload damage. Some deposition of iron was noted in the spleen and liver of the treated dogs. A series of reproductive toxicology studies were performed to assess the effects on fertility (in the rat), peri- and postnatal reproductive function (in the rat) and fetal toxicity (in the rat and the rabbit). Treatment with iron protein succinylate did not result in any adverse effect on reproductive performance nor did it affect the incidences of malformations, visceral and skeletal anomalies or skeletal variants. There was no evidence of mutagenic activity in a comprehensive series of in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity studies. No secondary pharmacological effects of the product were noted in a wide range of single and repeated administration studies. Overall, the available toxicology and safety profile of this product offers ample assurances of the safety of iron protein succinylate in clinical use.