Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 172
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(26): e20914, 2020 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590802

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been established as an important cause of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with very high mortality. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) producing MRSA has been reported to be associated with necrotizing pneumonia and worse outcome. The incidence of community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) pneumonia is very low, as only a few CA-MRSA pneumonia cases were reported in the last few years. We present a case of severe CAP caused by PVL-positive MRSA with ensuing septic shock. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 68-year-old male with no concerning medical history had developed a fever that reached 39.0°C, a productive cough that was sustained for 5 days, and hypodynamia. He was treated with azithromycin and alexipyretic in a nearby clinic for 2 days in which the symptoms were alleviated. However, 1 day later, the symptoms worsened, and he was taken to a local Chinese medicine hospital for traditional medicine treatment. However, his clinical condition deteriorated rapidly, and he then developed dyspnea and hemoptysis. DIAGNOSIS: CA-MRSA pneumonia and septic shock. The sputum culture showed MRSA. Polymerase chain reaction of MRSA isolates was positive for PVL genes. INTERVENTIONS: Mechanical ventilation, fluid resuscitation, and antibiotic therapy were performed. Antibiotic therapy included mezlocillin sodium/sulbactam sodium, linezolid, and oseltamivir. OUTCOMES: He died after 12 hours of treatment. LESSONS: This is a report of severe pneumonia due to PVL-positive CA-MRSA in a healthy adult. CA-MRSA should be considered a pathogen of severe CAP, especially when combined with septic shock in previously healthy individuals.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/etiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Tosse/etiologia , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/microbiologia , Humanos , Hipocinesia/etiologia , Linezolida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico , Choque Séptico/etiologia , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologia
2.
J Perinat Med ; 34(3): 203-6, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16602839

RESUMO

AIMS: To evaluate whether primary application of mezlozillin in preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM) prolongs pregnancy and lowers neonatal morbidity. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study a total of 105 pregnant women with pPROM between 24 + 0 and 32 + 6 weeks of gestation were examined receiving i.v. injections of corticoids and tocolytics as well as mezlocillin (3 x 2 g/d) or placebo. Assessed factors were prolongation of pregnancy and neonatal morbidity such as neonatal infection, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). RESULTS: Prolongation of pregnancy by more than 7 days was achieved in 63.8% of the mezlocillin group versus 44.8% of the placebo group (P < 0.05). The babies of mothers treated with anibiotics had fewer neonatal infections, RDS, IVH and NEC. Total morbidity was significantly lowered in the verum group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic administration following preterm premature rupture of membranes is associated with a prolongation of pregnancy and a reduction of neonatal infectious morbidity.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/tratamento farmacológico , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Enterocolite Necrosante/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia
3.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 37(1): 25-6, 2002 Jan.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11953060

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the appropriate antibiotic for prophylactic use in cesarean section. METHODS: The effects and side effects of prophylatic antibiotics in 1 266 cesarean section were studied retrospectively. Six regiems were engaged: (1) Penicillin and Ampicillin; (2) Mezlocillin sodium; (3) Sulbactam and Ampicillin; (4) Ciprofloxacin; (5) Clindamycin; (6) Cefacidal. RESULTS: The duration of postoperative body temperature return to normal of 1 - 6 group is (54.0 +/- 28.4) hours, (48.9 +/- 27.8) hours, (49.9 +/- 23.9) hours, (58.6 +/- 33.7) hours, (52.5 +/- 25.2) hours, (63.1 +/- 51.1) hours respectively. It was longer in cefazolin group than the others. There were less puerperal morbidity and side effects of Mezlocillin. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin and Ampicillin are still the most common choices as prophylatic antibiotic in cesarean section. Mezlocillin is appropriate as well.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Cesárea , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico
4.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 386(6): 397-401, 2001 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11735011

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis surely reduces surgical infection rate. Pharmacokinetic data of oral ofloxacin in combination with its antibacterial spectrum suggest effective protection against perioperative infection. In addition, costs, adverse effects, and induction of microbial resistance are low. Therefore we performed a controlled randomized study comparing oral and intravenous single dose prophylaxis. METHODS: A total of 61 patients undergoing colonic or pancreatic resection randomly received either a single dose standard intravenous prophylaxis or ofloxacin 400 mg and metronidazole 500 mg orally 2 h before surgery. Postoperative infections were recorded for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Groups were very well comparable regarding age, overweight, concomitant disease, type and duration of surgery, blood loss, and volume support. Infectious complications occurred in 14.8% after parenteral and 3.3% after enteral antibiotic prophylaxis. There was no difference in post-operative hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that single-dose oral ofloxacin is at least as effective as a standard intravenous prophylaxis in patients with colonic or pancreatic resection. It offers significant advantages regarding costs and ease of administration.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Administração Oral , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Colo/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Mezlocilina/administração & dosagem , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
5.
Infection ; 29(4): 222-7, 2001 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11545485

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perioperative prophylaxis is recommended to be administered intravenously which, compared to oral prophylaxis, is more expensive. However, pharmacokinetic data on oral perioperative prophylaxis in patients with preoperative surgical and anesthesiological preparation are not available. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 40 patients with open hernial repair or cholecystectomy (low-risk group), colonic or pancreatic resection (high-risk group) received a standard single-dose perioperative prophylaxis with 4.5 g mezlocillin and 0.5 g metronidazole intravenously in addition to 400 mg ofloxacin orally 2 h prior to surgery. Antibiotic concentrations were measured perioperatively and pharmacokinetic data calculated. RESULTS: Serum and tissue concentrations of ofloxacin were above the MIC90 of the potential bacterial spectrum for surgical infection throughout the entire operation. Pharmacokinetic data were not influenced by preoperative surgical or anesthesiological preparation. CONCLUSION: Tissue and serum concentrations and the antibacterial spectrum of orally administered ofloxacin suggest effective protection against perioperative infection. Pharmacokinetic data confirm that oral ofloxacin may be used effectively as single-dose perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Since there are no clinical data comparing oral and intravenous singLe-dose prophylaxis, a prospective randomized clinical trial should be performed.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/farmacocinética , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Ofloxacino/farmacocinética , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Administração Oral , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Metronidazol/farmacocinética , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Mezlocilina/farmacocinética , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Ofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Penicilinas/farmacocinética , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Minerva Med ; 86(4): 167-9, 1995 Apr.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7623973

RESUMO

The authors report their experience of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective biliary surgery pertinent to 246 operated patients treated with short-term prophylaxis with mezlocillin. This method has turned out to be efficacious in reducing postoperative infections incidence, particularly in simple cholecystectomy. Therefore the authors advise using such a procedure in this frequent operation too.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Pré-Medicação , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
8.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7782594

RESUMO

Maternofetal infection occurs in 1 to 10 of every 1,000 newborns. Prognosis is poor and an extremely rapid the clinical course is sometimes observed. The situation suggests that widespread use of antibiotics and more than 90% of the newborns receiving antibiotics are not infected. A prospective study based on simple, recognized criteria predictive of maternal-fetal infection was conducted in 3,392 deliveries to evaluate the effect of an antibiotic prophylaxy protocol. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value were evaluated for each of the eleven criteria retained with the goal of increasing sensitivity and decrease the use of unnecessary antibiotics. Among the 3,392 infants delivered from January 1989 to December 1990, 286 (8.4%) newborns entered the study and were given mezlocillin (150 mg/kg/12 h). This treatment was stopped at 48 hours of life if the infant was not infected. RESULTS. Infection was confirmed in 48 of 3,392 infants (1.4%). All were in the risk group: 48/286 (16.7%). The germs the most often found were group B Streptococcus (n = 16), Escherichia coli (n = 8) and Listeria monocytogenes (n = 3). Nine criteria were well correlated with maternal-fetal infection. The two most important criteria were maternal pyrexia above 39 degrees C and Apgar score below 7 to 5 min (poor neonatal adaptation), with a 99% and 90% and a positive predictive value of 80% and 37% respectively. Inversely, Two criteria were poorly correlated with maternal-fetal infection: labour duration above 12 hours and instrumental extraction (positive predictive value from 10% to 17%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Salas de Parto , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pré-Medicação , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
9.
Chemotherapy ; 40(1): 65-9, 1994.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8306818

RESUMO

The clinical efficacy of short-term antimicrobial prophylaxis with either one shot of ceftriaxone (1 g) or a course of 3 injections of a fixed combination of mezlocillin (2 g) and oxacillin (1 g) administered over 24 h was studied in a prospective randomized clinical study of 100 patients undergoing elective maxillofacial surgery. Tissue and plasma concentrations of the antibiotics were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography in 6 tumor surgery patients from each treatment group. Statistical analysis showed the treatment group to be comparable both demographically and with respect to the types of surgery performed and the durations of the procedures. Only 1 patient in each group developed a postoperative wound infection. It is concluded that 1 g ceftriaxone given 30 min preoperatively meets the pharmacokinetic requirements for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery.


Assuntos
Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Oxacilina/uso terapêutico , Cirurgia Bucal , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Ceftriaxona/administração & dosagem , Ceftriaxona/sangue , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prótese Maxilofacial , Mezlocilina/administração & dosagem , Mezlocilina/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Pré-Protéticos Bucais , Oxacilina/administração & dosagem , Oxacilina/sangue , Pré-Medicação , Estudos Prospectivos , Cirurgia Plástica
11.
Am Surg ; 59(1): 34-9, 1993 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8480929

RESUMO

Antibiotics play a crucial role in reducing the risk of postoperative infection in patients suffering penetrating abdominal trauma. The infection rate for patients with these injuries ranges from 7% to 16%. Single agents with broad-spectrum activity have proven efficacy, but dosage and duration are still controversial. A prospective, double-blinded study was performed on 102 patients randomized to receive one of three antibiotics for a total of 12 hours: cefoxitin (3 doses, 31 patients); ceftizoxime (2 doses, 36 patients); or mezlocillin (3 doses, 35 patients). Two distinct groups at risk for postoperative infection were evident depending on the severity of injury: Group A were those with no colon injury or a colon injury that could be repaired, no evidence of shock, or fewer than 3 organs injured; Group B were those requiring a colostomy, evidence of shock on presentation, or three or more organs injured. All comparisons of the patient populations receiving the different antibiotics showed the two groups to be equivalent. The mean penetrating abdominal trauma index for Group A was 8.8 and 28.2 for Group B. The overall infection rate for Group A was 10.3% and 42.3% for Group B. There was a significant increase in infection rate for all antibiotics except ceftizoxime in Group B compared with group A. The penetrating abdominal trauma index was significantly higher in all patients who developed infection for all antibiotics. In addition, if the surgical wound was closed primarily, patients with colon injuries developed wound infections 71% of the time, and those with small-bowel injuries did so 30% of the time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Cefoxitina/uso terapêutico , Ceftizoxima/uso terapêutico , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Infecção dos Ferimentos/tratamento farmacológico , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Infecção dos Ferimentos/epidemiologia
12.
Surg Gynecol Obstet ; 177 Suppl: 23-9; discussion 35-40, 1993.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8256188

RESUMO

In patients with acute cholecystitis, antibiotics are used as an adjunct to cholecystectomy to reduce the incidence of postoperative septic complications thought to be related to bactibilia. Combinations of penicillins, or cephalosporins or aminoglycosides, or both, are often used. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with excellent activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas species. It has a prolonged serum half-life, allowing twice-daily dosing, and is not nephrotoxic. This study was undertaken to determine whether or not cefepime was as effective as the combination of gentamicin and mezlocillin in patients with acute cholecystitis. One hundred and forty-nine patients were randomized, two to one, to receive cefepime or gentamicin and mezlocillin. Cefepime was given intravenously at 2 grams every 12 hours; gentamicin, 1.0 to 1.5 milligrams per kilograms every eight hours, and mezlocillin, 3 to 4 grams every four to six hours. All patients underwent cholecystectomy. Bile cultures were obtained, and concentrations of cefepime in blood, bile, peritoneal fluid and gallbladder were determined in a subset of patients. There were 56 evaluable cefepime-treated and 34 evaluable gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated patients. Bactibilia was present in 17 of 56 cefepime-treated patients (30.4 percent) and ten of 34 gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated patients (29.4 percent). Enterococci were recovered in six cefepime-treated patients. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were similar for the cefepime-treated and gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated groups, with one failure in each group, a wound infection in a patient receiving cefepime and a subhepatic abscess in a patients receiving gentamicin and mezlocillin. Other measures of outcome, such as the number of days of fever, days nothing by mouth, days of hospitalization and days of antibiotic therapy were similar in both groups. Cefepime, with every 12 hour dosing, achieved extremely high concentrations in all tissues assayed at the time of the operation, a mean of eight hours after administration. Adverse clinical events were similar in both treatment groups. Cefepime is as effective as gentamicin and mezlocillin in preventing septic complications after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cefepime requires fewer doses, does not require drug monitoring, is not associated with nephrotoxicity and may therefore prove to be a cost-effective alternative to combination therapy that uses an aminoglycoside.


Assuntos
Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Colecistite/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Colecistite/microbiologia , Colecistite/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Surg Gynecol Obstet ; 177 Suppl: 30-4; discussion 35-40, 1993.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8256189

RESUMO

Antibiotic treatment of biliary tract infections is widely accepted. An open, prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing cefepime (2 grams every 12 hours) with gentamicin (1.5 milligrams per kilograms every eight hours) plus mezlocillin (3 grams every four hours) for a minimum of five days was undertaken. Of the 149 patients enrolled, 120 were evaluable; 80 were randomized to receive cefepime and 40 were randomized to receive gentamicin plus mezlocillin (two to one randomization schedule). The diagnosis was acute cholecystitis in 101 patients and acute cholangitis in the remainder. There were no differences between the two treatment groups with regard to gender, age, disease, signs and symptoms, admitting temperature or laboratory values. All patients (100 percent) treated with gentamicin and mezlocillin were cured of the infection, as were 78 (97.5 percent) of the patients treated with cefepime (difference not significant). The incidence and spectrum of adverse events and complications were similar between the two groups (8.8 percent for cefepime versus 10 percent for gentamicin and mezlocillin). Our data show that the efficacy and safety of cefepime administered every 12 hours is equivalent to that of gentamicin and mezlocillin combination for treating patients with acute infections of the biliary tract. In addition, twice-daily administration of cefepime may be more cost-effective than the aminoglycoside-based combination.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Biliares/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Doenças Biliares/microbiologia , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 24(1): 25-33, 1992 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1399301

RESUMO

A prospective long-term study was carried out in 48 infants and children with chronic suppurative otitis media without cholesteatoma treated initially with wide spectrum intravenous antibiotics and suction and debridement. Patients were followed for a period of two years. All children were cured after completion of therapy. At 3 and 6 months follow-up 75% of the children were still free of discharge and at 12, 18 and 24 months the proportion of dry ears dropped to 71%, 66% and 52%, respectively. Eighty percent of all recurrences developed already during the first 6 months of follow-up. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common pathogen isolated, both in the initial and recurrent bouts of the disease, and was commonly associated with other pathogens. Children with early reappearance of ear discharge were less likely to benefit from further antimicrobial or surgical treatment. The recurrence rate was not affected by the antibiotic regimen, age, duration of drainage before treatment or the presence of granulation tissue. No intracranial or intratemporal complications were observed during the follow-up period.


Assuntos
Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Otite Média Supurativa/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Otite Média Supurativa/microbiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Chemother ; 3(4): 250-4, 1991 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1779260

RESUMO

The efficacy of mexlocillin-amikacin combination as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients was studied in 30 children (21 males, 9 females) with various oncologic diseases aged 1-15 years (mean age 7.3 +/- 4.4) in the Istanbul Medical School, Oncologic Disease Research and Treatment Center, and Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology between January 1 and May 31, 1988. The response rate was 76.6%. Profound persistent granulocytopenia (fewer than 100 ml) was present in 70% of the patients. In 63.3% of patients, the infections were microbiologically documented (60%) Gram(+) and 40% Gram(-). The combination was well tolerated with hepatic and/or renal disturbances in 8 cases (26.6%). We conclude that mezlocillin-amikacin is an effective empirical combination in the initial treatment of infections in febrile neutropenic children with various oncologic diseases.


Assuntos
Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Amicacina/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Infecções por Haemophilus/sangue , Infecções por Haemophilus/complicações , Infecções por Haemophilus/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Mezlocilina/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Neisseriaceae/sangue , Infecções por Neisseriaceae/complicações , Infecções por Neisseriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia/etiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/sangue , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/sangue , Infecções Estreptocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
17.
Minerva Med ; 82(6): 387-94, 1991 Jun.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2067712

RESUMO

Sulbactam is a beta-lactamase inhibitor that, when combined with ampicillin, extends its antibacterial activity against beta-lactamases producing organisms. The clinical efficacy and safety of the sulbactam/ampicillin (S/A) combination versus mezlocillin (M), was assessed in a prospective comparative randomised study. Sixty-five patients (12 children), with lower respiratory tract infections (40), UTIs (20), and skin/soft tissue infections (5), were treated with S/A (32) or M (33 patients), given IV or IM. The two treatment groups did not significantly differ in types of infection, infecting organisms, and severity of underlying disease. Explicit criteria were used to define infections, clinical response, local and systemic tolerability, and adverse effects. A total of 33 organisms were isolated; 3/33 were resistant to S/A, 7/33 to M, and 15/33 to A alone. A successful clinical outcome (cure + improvement), was obtained in 29 out of 30 assessable patients in the S/A group, and in 30/31 in the M group. Both treatments resulted 100% effective in eradicating infecting pathogens: this confirms their high bactericidal activity, also against bacterial species showing remarkable antibiotic resistance patterns, and in variously immunocompromised hosts. Both S/A and M; therapeutic courses were well tolerated; only four out of the 61 assessable patients (2 in S/A, and 2 in M group), experimented mild, transient side-effects, that did not require modification of the treatment regimens. We conclude that both S/A and M appeared very safe and effective drugs; in regard to clinical and microbiological effectiveness and local and systemic tolerability, no statistically significant differences (p greater than 0.05) between the two groups were observed, in treating various bacterial infections, in both adult and paediatric age.


Assuntos
Ampicilina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Sulbactam/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Combinação de Medicamentos , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
18.
Rev Infect Dis ; 13(1): 68-72, 1991.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2017635

RESUMO

Charts were reviewed for 63 patients whose chronic pseudomonas osteomyelitis was treated with high doses of extended-spectrum penicillins for prolonged periods. The incidence of untoward drug reactions was significantly higher than expected. Carbenicillin evoked adverse reactions in 22.8% of patients. However, most of these reactions were mild, and a change of drug was required in only 5.7% of cases. No adverse drug reactions were observed with cumulative doses of less than 750 g. In contrast to carbenicillin, the ureidopenicillins were associated with adverse reactions in 67.7% of patients; most reactions were moderate to severe in intensity; a cumulative dose of greater than 250 g produced adverse reactions; and discontinuation or change of therapy was required in 51.6% of cases. The main adverse reactions to both carbenicillin and the ureidopenicillins included rash, drug fever, leukopenia, eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, and hepatic damage.


Assuntos
Azlocilina/efeitos adversos , Carbenicilina/efeitos adversos , Mezlocilina/efeitos adversos , Piperacilina/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Azlocilina/administração & dosagem , Azlocilina/uso terapêutico , Carbenicilina/administração & dosagem , Carbenicilina/uso terapêutico , Eosinofilia/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Mezlocilina/administração & dosagem , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteomielite/tratamento farmacológico , Piperacilina/administração & dosagem , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente
19.
J Chemother ; 2(5): 306-9, 1990 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2090769

RESUMO

A randomized prospective study was undertaken at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic of the Catholic University of Rome in order to evaluate the effectiveness of two wide spectrum antibiotics: mezlocillin and cefotetan. Both drugs were administered 2 g i.v. 15 to 20 minutes preoperatively to allow optimal serum and tissue levels of antibiotic at the moment of bacterial innoculation. 184 patients undergoing elective gynecological surgery for nonmalignant disease were considered eligible for the study (124 pts abdominal hysterectomy, 58 pts vaginal hysterectomy). We found no statistically significant differences between the results obtained with the two drugs.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Cefotetan/uso terapêutico , Histerectomia , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/cirurgia , Cefotetan/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal , Injeções Intravenosas , Mezlocilina/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
20.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 163(3): 743-7, 1990 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2206065

RESUMO

The use of antibiotics in the management of preterm, premature rupture of membranes remains controversial. By use of a prospective randomized double-blind design we investigated the maternal-fetal benefits associated with antibiotic therapy in 85 women with premature rupture of membranes at 34 weeks' estimated gestational age. In the treatment group 40 patients received intravenous mezlocillin for 48 hours followed by oral ampicillin until delivery. In the control group 45 patients received intravenous and oral placebo. Patients who received antibiotics had chorioamnionitis and endometritis less frequently than the control group (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.05). Pathologic examination of the placentas showed a lower incidence of chorioamnionitis in the treatment group (p less than 0.05). The period from premature rupture of membranes to delivery (latency) was prolonged with antibiotics (p less than 0.05) and resulted in significant weight gain in the infants in the antibiotic group (p less than 0.0001). These infants also had higher 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores. Clinically suspected sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, perinatal death rate, and prolonged hospitalization (greater than 30 days) were also increased in the control group.


Assuntos
Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/tratamento farmacológico , Mezlocilina/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Ampicilina/administração & dosagem , Corioamnionite/prevenção & controle , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Endometrite/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Morte Fetal/prevenção & controle , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/complicações , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Mezlocilina/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA