RESUMO
A survey of mycology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was undertaken in France in 2018, to better understand the difference in practices between the participating centers and to identify the difficulties they may encounter as well as eventual gaps with published standards and guidelines. The survey captured information from 45 mycology laboratories in France on how they perform AFST (number of strains tested, preferred method, technical and quality aspects, interpretation of the MIC values, reading and interpretation difficulties). Results indicated that 86% of respondents used Etest as AFST method, with a combination of one to seven antifungal agents tested. Most of the participating laboratories used similar technical parameters to perform their AFST method and a large majority used, as recommended, internal and external quality assessments. Almost all the participating mycology laboratories (98%) reported difficulties to interpret the MIC values, especially when no clinical breakpoints are available. The survey highlighted that the current AFST practices in France need homogenization, particularly for MIC reading and interpretation.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Laboratórios , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Micologia , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , França , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Laboratórios/normas , Laboratórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/métodos , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Micologia/história , Micologia/métodos , Micologia/normas , Micologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/normas , Controle de Qualidade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
This issue is dedicated to the 90th birthday of Professor Shu-Ting Chang, a prominent scientist in the field of mushroom biology, including cultivation and nutritional values of mushrooms, medicinal mushroom science, and environmental impact of mushrooms. Professor Shu-Ting Chang is also one of the initiators and has been an editor of our journal from its inception (in 1999) until now.
Assuntos
Agaricales , Micologia/história , Agaricales/química , Agaricales/classificação , Agaricales/genética , Agaricales/fisiologia , China , História do Século XX , Valor NutritivoAssuntos
Agaricales , Micologia/história , Austrália , China , História do Século XX , História do Século XXIRESUMO
Anton de Bary is best known for his elucidation of the life cycle of Phytopthora infestans, the causal organism of late blight of potato and the crop losses that caused famine in nineteenth-century Europe. But while practitioner histories often claim this accomplishment as a founding moment of modern plant pathology, closer examination of de Bary's experiments and his published work suggest that his primary motiviation for pursing this research was based in developmental biology, not agriculture. De Bary shied away from making any recommendations for agricultural practice, and instead focused nearly exclusively on spontaneous generation and fungal development - both concepts promoted through prize questions posted by the Académie des Sciences in the 1850s and 1860s. De Bary's submission to the Académie's 1859 Alhumbert prize question illustrates his own contributions to debates about spontaneous generation and demonstrates the practical applications of seemingly philosophical questions - such as the origin of life.