Characterization of recessive RYR1 mutations in core myopathies.

We have characterized at the molecular level, three families with core myopathies carrying apparent recessive mutations in their RYR1 gene and studied the pharmacological properties of myotubes carrying endogenous mutations as well as the properties of mutant channels expressed in HEK293 cells. The proband of family 1 carried p.Ala1577Thr+p.Gly2060Cys in trans, having inherited a mutation from each parent. Immunoblot analysis of proteins from the patient's skeletal muscle revealed low levels of ryanodine receptor (RyR1) but neither substitution alone or in combination affected the functional properties of RyR1 channels in a discernable way. Two affected siblings in family 2 carried p.Arg109Trp+p.Met485Val substitutions in cis, inherited from the unaffected father. Interestingly, both affected siblings only transcribed the mutated paternal allele in skeletal muscle, whereas the maternal allele was silent. Single-channel measurements showed that recombinant, mutant RyR1 channels carrying both substitutions lost the ability to conduct Ca2+. In this case as well, low levels of RyR1 were present in skeletal muscle extracts. The proband of family 3 carried p.Ser71Tyr+p.Asn2283His substitutions in trans. Recombinant channels with Asn2283His substitution showed an increased activity, whereas recombinant channels with p.Ser71Tyr+p.Asn2283His substitution lost activity upon isolation. Taken together, our data suggest major differences in the ways RYR1 mutations may affect patients with core myopathies, by compromising RyR1 protein expression, stability and/or activity.

Magnetic resonance imaging of muscle in congenital myopathies associated with RYR1 mutations.

Mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene are associated with a wide range of phenotypes, comprising central core disease and distinct subgroups of multi-minicore disease. We report muscle MRI findings of 11 patients from eight families with RYR1 mutations (n=9) or confirmed linkage to the RYR1 locus (n=2). Patients had clinical features of a congenital myopathy with a wide variety of associated histopathological changes. Muscle MR images showed a consistent pattern characterized by (a) within the thigh: selective involvement of vasti, sartorius, adductor magnus and relative sparing of rectus, gracilis and adductor longus; (b) within the lower leg: selective involvement of soleus, gastrocnemii and peroneal group and relative sparing of the tibialis anterior. Our findings indicate that patients with RYR1-related congenital myopathies have a recognizable pattern of muscle involvement irrespective of the variability of associated histopathological findings. Muscle MRI may supplement clinical assessment and aid selection of genetic tests particularly in patients with non-diagnostic or equivocal histopathological features.

Multiminicore disease in a family susceptible to malignant hyperthermia: histology, in vitro contracture tests, and genetic characterization.

BACKGROUND: Histological anomalies associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH) have been scarcely reported. In some patients susceptible to MH (MHS), central cores have been identified and a genetic association has been proposed, but multiminicore lesions have not been systematically reported. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between multiminicores and MHS in a large family with MH with an approach combining histology, in vitro contracture tests, and genetic analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine members of an MH family (147 members) were investigated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Muscle biopsy specimens were analyzed histologically and with in vitro contracture tests. Genetic analyses were performed to determine the presence of mutations in the ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene. RESULTS: According to the gold standard in vitro contracture tests, 17 patients were diagnosed as having MHS and 10 as not being susceptible. Multiminicores were found in 16 of the 17 MHS patients and in a single nonsusceptible participant. A linkage between the MH trait and the RYR1 locus in chromosome 19 was demonstrated, whereas no already known mutations were found. Two missense heterozygous mutations (R2676W and T2787S) were identified from sequencing of the entire coding complementary DNA. Overall, we found a significant association between MHS and the presence of multiminicores (chi(2) = 26.5, P<.001) on the one hand and the presence of new mutations in the RYR1 gene (chi(2) = 19.0, P<.001) on the other hand. This remarkably high occurrence of multiminicores in an MHS family is uncommon, and genetic analyses indicate that the association between multiminicores and MHS is linked to a novel R2656W and T2787S substitution present on the same allele of the RYR1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that multiminicore lesions are observed in MHS patients with neither clinical signs related to multiminicore disease nor histological features of congenital myopathies. These multiminicore lesions may be secondary to mutations in the RYR1 gene. As a consequence, these patients must be distinguished from patients with multiminicore disease and from other MHS patients for whom multiminicores are not observed.