Disposition of a novel and potent alpha(v)beta3 antagonist in animals, and extrapolation to man.

1. The disposition of 3-[2-oxo-3-[3-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,8]naphthyridin-2-yl) propyl]-imidazolidin-1-yl]-3(S)-(6-methoxy-pyridin-3-yl)propionic acid (compound A), a potent and selective alpha(v)beta(3) antagonist, was characterized in several animal species in support of its selection for preclinical safety studies and potential clinical development. 2. Compound A exhibited marked species differences in pharmacokinetics; the plasma clearances and bioavailabilities ranged from 33-47 ml min(-1) kg(-1) in rats and mice to 4-9 ml min(-1) kg(-1) in dogs and monkeys, and about 20% in rats to 70-80% in dogs and monkeys, respectively. Both the intravenous (i.v.) and oral kinetics of compound A were linear over the dose range studied in dogs (0.1-5 mg kg(-1) i.v. and 0.25-20 mg kg(-1) orally [p.o.]) and rats (1-30 mg kg(-1) i.v. and 4-160 mg kg(-1) p.o.). 3. Compound A was eliminated substantially by urinary excretion; the urinary recovery of the unchanged drug was 67% in rhesus, 48% in dogs and about 30% in rats. In these animal species, biotransformation was modest. 4. Following i.v. administration of [(14)C]-compound A to rats, the radioactivity rapidly distributed to all tissues investigated, with high levels of the radioactivity detected in liver, kidney and intestine soon after the drug administration. The radioactivity declined rapidly, with less than 1% of the i.v. dose remaining at 30-h post-dose. 5. Compound A was moderately bound to plasma proteins, with unbound fractions of 26, 20, 14 and 5% for rats, dogs, monkeys and humans, respectively. It was bound primarily to human alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (about 85% binding at 0.1% concentration), as compared with human albumin (< 50% binding at 4% concentration). 6. Using simple allometry, compound A was predicted to exhibit relatively low clearance (1-3 ml min(-1) kg(-1)) and low volume of distribution (0.1-0.3 l kg(-1)) in humans. Based on the predicted values, compound A was projected to exhibit a favourable oral pharmacokinetic profile in humans, with good bioavailability (50-80%). These predicted values provided a basis for compound selection for further development.

The efficacy of trovafloxacin versus ceftriaxone in the treatment of experimental brain abscess/cerebritis in the rat.

Current estimates of the mortality associated with brain abscesses range from 0-24%, with neurological sequellae in 30-55% of survivors. Although the incidence of brain abscess appears to be increasing, likely due to an increase in the population of immunosuppressed patients, the condition is still sufficiently uncommon to make human clinical trials of therapy problematic. An animal model to study the efficacy of new treatment regimens, specifically, new antimicrobial agents is therefore necessary. This study uses a well-defined experimental paradigm as an inexpensive method of inducing and studying the efficacy of antibiotics in brain abscess. The rat model of brain abscess/cerebritis developed at this institution was used to determine the relative efficacy of trovafloxacin as compared to ceftriaxone in animals infected with Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus ( approximately 10(5) CFU in 1 microliter) was injected with a Hamilton syringe, very slowly, over the course of 70 minutes after a two mm burr hole was created with a spherical carbide drill just posterior to the coronal suture and four mm lateral to the midline. Eighteen hours later treatment was begun; every 8 hours the rats were dosed with subcutaneous ceftriaxone (n = 10), trovafloxacin (n = 11) or 0.9% sterile pyogen-free saline (n = 10). After four days of treatment the brains were removed and sectioned with a scalpel. The entire injected hemisphere was homogenized and quantitative cultures performed. The mean +/- SEM log(10) colony forming units/ml S. aureus recovered from homogenized brain were as follows: controls 6.10 +/- 0.28; ceftriaxone 3.43 +/- 0.33; trovafloxacin 3.65 +/- 0.3. There was no significant difference in bacterial clearance between ceftriaxone versus trovafloxacin (p = 0.39). Trovafloxacin or other quinolones may provide a viable alternative to intravenous antibiotics in patients with brain abscess/cerebritis.

Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin in a mouse model of cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia.

Trovafloxacin is a potentially useful agent for treatment of infections caused by cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We studied the effectiveness of trovafloxacin therapy and examined the correlation between pharmacodynamic indices in serum and lung, and bacterial killing. Immunocompetent Balb/c mice were infected by intranasal inoculation of a cephalosporin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolate (MIC of ceftriaxone and trovafloxacin 2 and 0.06 mg/L, respectively). Trovafloxacin 10-30 mg/kg/day in one or three divided doses was started 15 h after infection. Serum and lung drug concentrations were measured at multiple time points for 24 h. Serum concentrations peaked at 30-60 min and lung concentrations approximately 30 min later. The serum T1/2 was approximately 9 h and lung T1/2 varied from 5 to 9 h. Lung AUC and Cmax values were 2-3 times greater than those in serum. At the start of therapy lung bacterial concentrations were 8.4 +/- 0.3 log10 cfu/mL and 24 h later had decreased by 3.5 +/- 0.2, 4.0 +/- 0.2, 0.8 +/- 0.3 and 1.0 +/- 1.2 log10 cfu/mL with 30 mg/kg x 1, 10 mg/kg x 3, 10 mg/kg x 1 and 3.3 mg/kg x 3 regimens, respectively. Although the larger dosages were more effective (P < 0.001) the differences between divided and single dosage regimens were not significant. Trovafloxacin serum AUC/MIC ratio correlated best with bacterial killing in the lungs over 24 h. Trovafloxacin is likely to be useful in the treatment of cephalosporin-resistant S. pneumoniae pneumonia.

Efficacy of trovafloxacin in treatment of experimental staphylococcal or streptococcal endocarditis.

The efficacy of trovafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and viridans group streptococci was investigated in vitro and in an experimental model of endocarditis. The MICs at which trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin inhibited 90% of clinical isolates of such bacteria (MIC90s) were (i) 0.03 and 2 mg/liter, respectively, for 30 ciprofloxacin-susceptible S. aureus isolates, (ii) 32 and 128 mg/liter, respectively, for 20 ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus isolates, and (iii) 0.25 and 8 mg/liter, respectively, for 28 viridans group streptococci. Rats with aortic vegetations were infected with either of two ciprofloxacin-susceptible but methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (strains COL and P8), one penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus sanguis strain, or one penicillin-resistant Streptococcus mitis strain. Rats were treated for 3 or 5 days with doses that resulted in kinetics that simulated those achieved in humans with trovafloxacin (200 mg orally once a day), ciprofloxacin (750 mg orally twice a day), vancomycin (1 g intravenously twice a day), or ceftriaxone (2 g intravenously once a day). Against the staphylococci, the activities of both trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equivalent to that of vancomycin, and treatment of endocarditis with these drugs was successful (P < 0.05). However, ciprofloxacin selected for resistant derivatives in vitro and in vivo, whereas trovafloxacin was 10 to 100 times less prone than ciprofloxacin to select for resistance in vitro and did not select for resistance in vivo. Against the two streptococcal isolates, trovafloxacin significantly (P < 0.05) decreased bacterial counts in the vegetations but was less effective than the control drug, ceftriaxone. Thus, a simulated oral dose of trovafloxacin (200 mg per day) was effective against ciprofloxacin-susceptible staphylococci and was less likely than ciprofloxacin to select for resistance. The simulated oral dose of trovafloxacin also had some activity against streptococcal endocarditis, but optimal treatment of infections caused by such organisms might require higher doses of the drug.

Efficacy of trovafloxacin, a new quinolone antibiotic, in experimental staphylococcal endocarditis due to oxacillin-resistant strains.

Therapeutic options for severe infections caused by strains of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (ORSE) are very limited. With the increasing resistance of such strains to aminoglycosides, rifampin, and currently available quinolone agents, as well as the recent documentation of increasing resistance of ORSA to vancomycin (VANCO), new treatment alternatives are imperative. The in vivo efficacy of trovafloxacin (TROVA), a new quinolone agent with excellent antistaphylococcal activity in vitro, against experimental endocarditis (IE) due to beta-lactamase-producing ORSA and ORSE strains (ORSA and ORSE IE) was evaluated. TROVA (25 mg/kg of body weight intravenously [i.v.] twice daily [b.i.d]) was compared to VANCO (20 mg/kg i.v. b.i.d.) and two regimens of ampicillin-sulbactam (AMP-SUL; 200 mg/kg intramuscularly [i.m.] three times a day [t.i.d.] and 20 mg/kg i.m. b.i.d.), with all agents given for 3 or 6 days. AMP-SUL was included as a comparative treatment regimen because of its proven efficacy against experimental ORSA and ORSE IE. For both ORSA and ORSE IE, TROVA, AMP-SUL, and VANCO each reduced staphylococcal densities in vegetations compared to untreated controls (P < 0.01). For ORSA IE, TROVA was the most rapidly bactericidal agent--although not to a statistically significant degree--correlating with its superior bactericidal effect in vitro compared to those of VANCO and AMP-SUL.

Trovafloxacin in treatment of rabbits with experimental meningitis caused by high-level penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

The fluoroquinolone trovafloxacin was bactericidal (0.47 +/- 0.23 delta log10 CFU/ml x h after 10 mg/kg of body weight and 0.78 +/- 0.15 delta log10 CFU/ml x h after 30 mg/kg) in the treatment of experimental meningitis caused by a highly penicillin-resistant (MIC and minimum bactericidal concentration = 4 and 4 microg/ml) strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Combinations with ampicillin and rifampin were indifferent compared to single drugs.

Evaluation of CP-99,219, a new fluoroquinolone, for treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis.

CP-99,219 is a new fluoroquinolone that has excellent activity against gram-positive organisms including penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. In our well-established rabbit model of meningitis, we conducted experiments to determine the concentrations of CP-99,219 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after intravenous administration and its ability to eradicate two penicillin-resistant pneumococcal isolates. The peak and trough concentrations of CP-99,219 in the CSF were from 19 to 25% of the concentrations simultaneously obtained in serum and were unaffected by concomitant dexamethasone administration. Compared with untreated (control) animals, three doses of CP-99,219 given 5 h apart significantly reduced the bacterial count in CSF by 5 to 6 log10 CFU at 10 h. Although 47% of the dexamethasone-treated animals and 18% of those not given the steroid had positive cultures at 24 h (14 h after administration of the last antibiotic dose), the mean bacterial counts did not change from those observed at 10 h. Additionally, only results for animals infected with one of the two pneumococcal strains appeared to be affected by concomitant dexamethasone therapy.

Comparison of difloxacin, enoxacin, and cefoperazone for treatment of experimental Enterobacter aerogenes endocarditis.

This study compared difloxacin administered orally, enoxacin administered orally, and cefoperazone administered intramuscularly for the treatment of experimental Enterobacter aerogenes endocarditis. Difloxacin significantly reduced bacterial counts of vegetations, as compared with enoxacin and cefoperazone. Enoxacin and cefoperazone did not differ significantly. This study demonstrated that difloxacin was significantly more effective than enoxacin and cefoperazone for the treatment of E. aerogenes endocarditis in rabbits.

Comparative evaluation of ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, and ofloxacin in experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.

The therapeutic activity of ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, and ofloxacin was evaluated in guinea pigs with acute and chronic experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Intratracheal instillations of P. aeruginosa resulted in fatal pneumonia in all untreated animals within 36 h. Among treatment groups (80 mg/kg [body weight] per day), cumulative survival rates were: 47%, ciprofloxacin; 55%, enoxacin; and 42%, ofloxacin. These rates were not significantly different. Intrapulmonary killing of P. aeruginosa was equivalent 3 h after a single dose of ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin (20 mg/kg) or enoxacin (40 mg/kg). The combination of ciprofloxacin with azlocillin, ceftazidime, or tobramycin did not increase the efficacy of intrapulmonary killing of P. aeruginosa over that of ciprofloxacin alone. A chronic, nonfatal bronchopneumonia was induced in guinea pigs by intratracheal instillation of microscopic agar beads impregnated with a mucoid strain of P. aeruginosa. Compared with no treatment, ciprofloxacin and enoxacin produced greater than or equal to 99.9% intrapulmonary killing, and ofloxacin sterilized the lungs completely, after 4 days of treatment. In no quinolone-treated animal did resistant strains of P. aeruginosa emerge during 4-day treatment periods. In further studies with the chronic model, oral and parenteral ciprofloxacin treatment were found to be equivalent in efficacy. We conclude that several quinolone derivatives may be effective for the treatment of P. aeruginosa pneumonia and that combinations of quinolones with beta-lactams or aminoglycosides may not increase efficacy against P. aeruginosa pneumonia.

Chemotherapeutic effects of ofloxacin (HOE 280) and other quinolone-carboxylic derivates in the treatment of experimental lung infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae DT-S in mice.

The chemotherapeutic activity of ofloxacin (HOE 280), a new pyridone-carboxylic acid derivative, was compared with that of other drugs in the same group, including norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin and in some cases pipemidic acid and nalidixic acid. The test model used was experimental pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae DT-S in mice. In the treatment of pneumonic mice, ofloxacin was 4 to 18 times more effective than norfloxacin and enoxacin and in most cases slightly more effective than ciprofloxacin. Pipemidic acid and nalidixic acid showed only low activity or proved to be inactive. In studies on the bactericidal activity of the compounds in vivo, ofloxacin produced a more pronounced effect than ciprofloxacin. With norfloxacin and enoxacin, a bactericidal effect in the infected tissue of the animals was only observed during the first hours after treatment.

Enoxacin compared with cefoperazone for the treatment of experimental Enterobacter aerogenes endocarditis.

This study compared enoxacin administered orally with cefoperazone administered intramuscularly for the treatment of Enterobacter aerogenes endocarditis in rabbits. The MICs and MBCs of both enoxacin and cefoperazone for an inoculum of 10(5) CFU/ml of the E. aerogenes strain used were 0.8 micrograms/ml, respectively. With an inoculum of 10(8) organisms per ml, enoxacin at 2 and 5 micrograms/ml and cefoperazone at 60 and 155 micrograms/ml were effective in reducing titers of E. aerogenes in broth. E. aerogenes endocarditis in rabbits was treated with enoxacin (100 or 25 mg/kg orally every 6 h) or cefoperazone (60 mg/kg intramuscularly every 6 h) for 5 or 10 days. Enoxacin at 100 and 25 mg/kg significantly reduced bacterial titers of vegetations compared with those of untreated controls. Enoxacin at 100 mg/kg was significantly more effective than enoxacin at 25 mg/kg and cefoperazone. Enoxacin at 25 mg/kg and cefoperazone did not differ significantly. Cefoperazone and controls did not differ significantly. In uninfected rabbits single doses of cefoperazone achieved much higher concentrations in serum than single doses of enoxacin (25 and 100 mg/kg). The half-lives of enoxacin at 25 and 100 mg/kg were approximately three times longer than that of cefoperazone.