Corticosteroid use and bone mineral accretion in children with asthma: effect modification by vitamin D.

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of corticosteroids on bone mineral accretion (BMA) have been well documented. Vitamin D insufficiency, a prevalent condition in the pediatric population, has also been associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether children with asthma who have lower vitamin D levels are more susceptible to the negative effects of corticosteroids on BMD over time. METHODS: Children aged 5 to 12 years with mild-to-moderate asthma who participated in the Childhood Asthma Management Program were followed for a mean of 4.3 years. Total doses of inhaled corticosteroids and oral corticosteroids (OCSs) were recorded, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels were measured at the beginning of the trial, and serial dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans of the lumbar spine were performed. Annual BMA rates were defined as follows: [(BMD at 4 years' follow-up - BMD at baseline)/4 years]. RESULTS: BMA was calculated for 780 subjects. In boys baseline vitamin D levels significantly modified the relationship between OCSs and BMA (vitamin D × OCS interaction, P= .023). Stratification by vitamin D levels showed a decrease in BMA with increased use of OCSs in vitamin D-insufficient boys only (P< .001). Compared with vitamin D-sufficient boys, vitamin D-insufficient boys exposed to more than 2 courses of OCSs per year had twice the decrease in BMA rate (relative to boys who were OCS unexposed). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D levels significantly modified the effect of OCSs on BMA in boys. Further research is needed to examine whether vitamin D supplementation in children with poorly controlled asthma might confer benefits to bone health.

Ocular anti-allergic compounds selectively inhibit human mast cell cytokines in vitro and conjunctival cell infiltration in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Conjunctival mast cells (MCs) are important effector cells in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, via histamine and cytokine secretion. Several new anti-allergic eye drops stabilize MCs and block histamine receptors, but their anti-inflammatory effects are unclear. OBJECTIVE: Anti-allergic drugs were compared for their anti-inflammatory effects in an in vitro model of human MC activation and in an experimental murine model of allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: Human cord blood stem cell-derived (CBMC) and conjunctival biopsy-derived MCs were stimulated via FcepsilonRI, degranulation and histamine release were assayed at 1 h and cytokine secretion at 24 h using multiplex arrays. Mice sensitized to short ragweed pollen were given anti-allergics topically before allergen challenge, and conjunctival immuno-staining was performed at 24 h. RESULTS: After a 1 h stimulation, 80% of the CBMC had degranulated and secreted histamine (27.9+/-4.7 ng/10(6) cells; P<0.05). Pre-treatment by all drugs significantly reduced histamine and TNF-alpha, whereas IL-5, IL-8, IL-10 and TNF-beta profiles were differentially decreased. For conjunctival biopsy-derived cultures (n=11), FcepsilonR1 stimulation increased histamine, TNF-alpha, TNF-beta, IL-5 and IL-8 levels and the production of IL-5, IL-6 (P<0.05), histamine and IL-8 (P<0.01) was inhibited by epinastine. In vivo, epinastine and olopatadine pre-treatment significantly reduced the clinical scores and eosinophil numbers (n=6; P<0.05) while epinastine also reduced neutrophils (P<0.02). CONCLUSION: Differential effects on MC cytokine inhibition were observed, with epinastine inhibiting MC secretion of IL-5, IL-8, IL-10 and conjunctival neutrophil infiltration. The anti-allergic drugs have anti-histamine and mast-cell stabilizing properties but might differ in clinical improvement depending on the individual and the cytokines involved.

Protective effects of nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate on gastroduodenal ulcers: a comparative study in rats.

Stabilization of mast cells plays a key mechanism to protect gastrointestinal tract from injury. This study presents a comparative evaluation of mast cell stabilizers nedocromil sodium (NDS) and sodium cromoglycate (SCG) in experimental gastric and duodenal ulcers in rats. Wistar rats of either sex were used in this study. Both NDS and SCG, in the doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg were given intraperitoneally for gastric secretion studies and by gavage for antiulcer studies. Acid secretion studies were undertaken in pylorus-ligated rats. Gastric lesions were induced by water immersion restraint stress (WIRS), indomethacin and ethanol whereas duodenal ulcers were produced by cysteamine. The level of glutathione (GSH) and gastric wall mucus were measured in glandular stomach of rats following ethanol-induced gastric lesions. SCG was more effective than NDS in preventing WIRS- and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions whereas reverse was true in ethanol- and cysteamine-induced ulcers. All the 3 doses of SCG offered almost equal protection against WIRS-induced gastric lesions whereas only medium and high dose of NDS provided significant protection in this model of ulcer. NDS significantly inhibited cysteamine-induced duodenal ulcers whereas SCG failed to do so. Pretreatment with NDS or SCG significantly and dose-dependently protected gastric mucosa against ethanol-induced injury, while the former drug appeared to be more effective. The cytoprotective effects of these two drugs were accompanied by the attenuation of ethanol-induced depletion of gastric wall mucus and GSH. The differential effects of NDS and SCG against various gastric lesions rationalize the possible benefits of a combined therapy (NDS+SCG) for the treatment of complex gastroduodenal ulcers.

Dissociation in the effect of nedocromil on mannitol-induced cough or bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Inhaled mannitol induces both bronchoconstriction and cough. Nedocromil sodium greatly attenuates mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction. Knowledge about the effect of nedocromil on mannitol-provoked cough might, therefore, clarify the mechanisms of this response. METHODOLOGY: Inhalation challenges with mannitol powder were performed after inhalation of 8 mg of nedocromil or its placebo in 24 subjects with asthma. The study was double-blind, randomised, and placebo-controlled. The mannitol-provoked coughs were manually recorded and the mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction was measured with a spirometer. RESULTS: The cumulative dose of mannitol that provoked at least two coughs tended to be higher on the nedocromil day than on the placebo day (34 (22--53) mg vs 26 (18--37) mg, P=0.051). The cumulative number of coughs per dose of mannitol was slightly, but significantly, lower on the nedocromil than on the placebo day (4.2 (2.8--6.3) coughs/100 mg vs 6.1 (4.0--9.4) coughs/100 mg, P=0.037). However, when analysed on a constant-dose basis, nedocromil provided no protection for coughing (-1% protection), whereas the protection for bronchoconstriction was clear (55% protection). CONCLUSIONS: Nedocromil strongly attenuates mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction but has a negligible effect on mannitol-provoked cough. Therefore, these responses seem to have different pathways in asthma. Recording of both provoked coughs and induced bronchoconstriction during mannitol challenge may provide supplementary information about a patient's disease.

Safety and application of induced sputum analysis in childhood asthma.

BACKGROUND: The value of sputum induction in pediatric asthma lies in its potential to directly and noninvasively assess airway inflammation in children, because bronchoscopy and biopsy carry some risk. The Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) study was designed to evaluate the long-term effects of budesonide and nedocromil compared with placebo in children with mild to moderate asthma across 8 centers. OBJECTIVE: At the Denver CAMP site, we sought to evaluate the safety of sputum induction, to determine differences in airway inflammation between treatment groups by using induced sputum analysis, and to examine correlations between other biomarkers and sputum eosinophils. METHODS: Sputum induction was performed, and exhaled nitric oxide, circulating eosinophil counts, and serum eosinophil cationic protein were obtained at treatment discontinuation and after washout. Spirometry and a methacholine challenge were also performed according to the CAMP protocol. RESULTS: Ninety of 117 children provided an adequate sputum sample for analysis. In 9 subjects (3 nedocromil and 6 placebo), sputum induction resulted in bronchospasm. These subjects had greater disease severity, as measured by a lower median prebronchodilator FEV 1 percentage predicted (85.0% vs 96.0%; P =.024) and FEV 1 /FVC ratio (70.0% vs 79.0%; P =.0008); greater bronchodilator reversibility (16.5% vs 6.8%; P =.004); higher serum IgE (1390.0 vs 495.0 ng/mL; P =.017) and circulating eosinophil count (757.0 vs 282.0/mm 3; P =.04); greater use of prednisone (1.9 vs 0.9 courses per 100 person-years; P =.05); and greater supplemental inhaled steroid doses (85.3 vs 0 mg; P =.016). At treatment discontinuation, budesonide-treated patients had a lower median (1st, 3rd quartile) sputum percentage eosinophil (SPEos) (0.2% [0%, 1.2%] vs 0.8% [0.2%, 4.6%]; P =.03) compared with those treated with placebo; no significant difference was noted between nedocromil- and placebo-treated patients. Higher SPEos at the time of treatment discontinuation was associated with asthma worsening that required rescue prednisone (n = 23) during the washout period compared with patients who remained stable (3.6% [0.4%, 6.4%] vs 0.6% [0.2%, 3.2%] SPEos; P =.023). Finally, greater SPEos was associated with atopy, higher bronchodilator reversibility, lower FEV 1 /FVC ratio, higher exhaled nitric oxide levels, circulating eosinophils, sputum and serum eosinophil cationic protein, more prednisone courses during the treatment period, and greater asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: Sputum induction is a relatively noninvasive and safe procedure that can provide information on eosinophilic inflammation and treatment response and is also associated with several measures of asthma control. However, this procedure still remains a research tool in asthma because of its requirements for technical expertise.

Relations between exhaled nitric oxide and measures of disease activity among children with mild-to-moderate asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) was evaluated in children with asthma after 4 to 6 years of treatment with budesonide, nedocromil, or albuterol as needed. STUDY DESIGN: FE(NO), spirometry, total eosinophil count, and serum eosinophil cationic protein levels were obtained from 118 children at the Denver site of the Childhood Asthma Management Program upon completion of treatment and after a 2- to 4-month washout. RESULTS: Budesonide-treated patients had significantly lower median (1st, 3rd quartile) FE(NO) (21.5 [13.2, 84.4] vs 62.5 [26.2, 115.0] ppb, P <.01) and eosinophil cationic protein levels (17.4 [10.1, 24.3] vs 24.0 [15.4, 33.9] mg/dL, P =.05) compared with placebo, whereas no differences were noted between nedocromil and placebo groups. After washout, FE(NO) levels were similar between the three treatments. FE(NO) levels significantly correlated with degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness, bronchodilator reversibility, allergen skin prick tests, serum IgE, and total eosinophil count. FE(NO) levels were also higher in patients with nocturnal symptoms and in patients requiring beta-agonist use at least once weekly. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide therapy was more effective than nedocromil in reducing FE(NO). Unfortunately, the effects of long-term budesonide were not sustained after its discontinuation. FE(NO) may be a complementary tool to current practice guidelines in assessing asthma control and medication response.

[Efficacy of low intensity laser irradiation and sodium nedocromil in the complex treatment of patients with bronchial asthma]. / Effektivnost' nizkointensivnogo lazernogo izlucheniia i nedokromila natriia pri kompleksnom lechenii bol'nykh bronkhial'noi astmoi.

AIM: To study efficiency of low-intensity laser radiation (LILR) and sodium nedokromil (tailed) in combined treatment of bronchial asthma (BA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The choice of the treatment depended on the activity of bronchial inflammation and the presence of contraindications. Laser was used on the skin in the area of the lung and great vessels projection, endobronchially. Tailed was given in inhalations and irrigations of the tracheobronchial tree during therapeutic fibrobronchoscopy. These methods were used in combined treatment of 220 BA patients. RESULTS: Combined use of LILR and tailed proved highly effective and safe in BA. Cytological markers of cell reactions of the bronchopulmonary system on the action of LILR were revealed. CONCLUSION: Availability, good reproducability, cost-effect efficacy and safety make LILR one of the most beneficial nonpharmacological treatments for bronchial asthma.

Exhaled nitric oxide in seasonal allergic rhinitis: influence of pollen season and therapy.

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) has been proposed as a potential indirect marker of lower airway inflammation in asthma. To investigate the existence of lower airways inflammation in allergic rhinitis eNO measurements were performed in 32 patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis early in and out of pollen seasons and in 80 healthy volunteers. To further define how exhaled NO is modified by therapy, NO levels were detected following 1-month treatment with either inhaled steroids or non-steroids therapy with nedocromil. Exhaled NO (mean +/- SE) was significantly elevated in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis with and without symptoms (24.2 + 2.5 and 13.9 + 2.9 ppb, respectively) as compared to healthy volunteers (4.5 + 0.3 ppb) both in and out of pollen season (21.2 + 2.1 and 9.0 + 1.4 p.p.b., respectively) with a higher increase during the allergen exposure in season. Higher levels of exhaled NO were detected in patients with symptoms, either from the upper or lower airways, and with bronchial hyperreactivity. The increased exhaled NO in symptomatic patients was reduced only by inhaled steroids and not by nedocromil. These findings possibly suggest the existence of lower airway inflammation in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in and out of pollen season. Thus, exhaled NO may be used as a non-invasive index for early detection of lower airway inflammation and for monitoring the optional treatment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ragweed pollen seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: A combined analysis of two multicenter, randomized, comparative, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials involving 261 patients diagnosed with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis was used. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either topical 2% nedocromil sodium or placebo twice daily for eight weeks. Diary card scores and clinician assessments of allergic symptoms were recorded throughout the study; efficacy was determined by comparing symptom severity at the peak pollen period with symptom severity at baseline. Clinician and patient evaluations of treatment effectiveness were used as secondary measurements of efficacy. RESULTS: Patients treated with nedocromil sodium experienced improvement in allergy symptoms, with reductions in the summary symptom score, itch, redness, conjunctival injection, and conjunctival edema significantly (p<0.05) greater than those observed in the patients treated with placebo. Clinicians' and patients' opinions of nedocromil sodium treatment effectiveness were significantly (p<0.02) superior to those of placebo treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Nedocromil sodium is effective in the management of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

Efficacy and safety of nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution b.i.d. in the treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

The efficacy and safety of twice-daily nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution and vehicle were compared in the treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Two separate multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled studies were subjected to a combined analysis. Following a one-week baseline period during the beginning of the ragweed pollen season, 189 patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis received either nedocromil sodium or vehicle b.i.d. for eight weeks. Efficacy was evaluated by patient diary cards and clinical eye examinations. Safety was assessed by reports of adverse events. Compared with vehicle, nedocromil sodium produced significantly greater decreases in summary symptom score (p = 0.005), itch (p = 0.005), tearing (p = 0.004), overall eye condition (p = 0.001), and clinician-evaluated conjunctival edema (p = 0.018), and significantly better (p = 0.001), and patient (p = 0.001) opinions of treatment effectiveness at the peak pollen period. Additionally, the superiority of nedocromil sodium compared to vehicle approached statistical significance in redness reduction (p = 0.087) and clinician-evaluated conjunctival injection (p = 0.087). There were no serious treatment-related adverse events in either treatment group. In summary, nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution b.i.d. was found to be effective and to have a favorable safety profile in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

Asthma education: creating a partnership.

This article advances the theory that the key to creating an effective partnership is teaching asthma patients what to self-treat, how to self-treat, and when to consult a clinician. The five comanaging rules that the health educator is encouraged to emphasize with the adult asthma patient are: know your own unique asthma symptoms and triggers; keep written records; see appropriate specialists; know your medicines and follow your action plan; and accept no treatment you do not understand. Current research shows asthma to be a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways. In susceptible individuals, this inflammation causes recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, and cough, particularly at night and in the early morning. The stepwise approach to asthma therapy divides asthma into several levels of severity. However, patients at any level of severity can have mild, moderate, or severe exacerbations. Asthma triggers; how to use a metered dose inhaler (MDI), a dry powder inhaler (DPI), and a peak flow meter; and how to follow an asthma action plan are thoroughly covered. The last section of the article deals at length with the indications for and actions of long-term-control medications, used to achieve and maintain control of persistent asthma, and quick-relief medications, used to treat symptoms and exacerbations.

[Membrane stabilizers (chromones and ketotifen)]. / Les stabilisateurs de membrane (cromones et kétotifène).

The drugs called "Membrane stabilisers" are composed of cromones (sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil) and Ketotifen. They inhibit the degranulation of mastocytes by a membrane stabilising effect. Ketotifen is distinguished from the cromones by a conjoint antihistamine effect. Nowadays, the indications are for prophylactic treatment of allergic asthma, rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis and the manifestations of food allergy. Therapeutic efficacy seems to be good in intermittent or mildly persistent asthma, especially in children or young subjects. Secondary effects are rare and generally benign, with reduced contra-indications.

Adrenal insufficiency in an adult on inhaled corticosteroids; recovery of adrenal function with inhaled nedocromil sodium.

BACKGROUND: Whereas oral corticosteroids and high-dose inhaled corticosteroids may be associated with suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids have not been reported to be associated with clinically significant adrenal insufficiency in the adult. OBJECTIVE: A case study of adrenal responsiveness after prolonged medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids and after replacement of steroid therapy by inhaled nedocromil sodium is described. METHODS: Standard 250-microg dose ACTH (cosyntropin) stimulation tests were followed after replacement of inhaled triamcinolone acetonide therapy by nedocromil sodium. RESULTS: A 55-year-old woman who had been on inhaled triamcinolone acetonide, 1600 microg/day for 12 years, presented with symptoms of adrenal hypofunction upon inhaled corticosteroid taper. An ACTH stimulation test confirmed adrenal insufficiency. She was switched to inhaled nedocromil sodium with improvement in her clinical syndrome and normalization of her ACTH stimulation test. CONCLUSION: Withdrawal from prolonged use of inhaled medium-dose corticosteroids may be associated with clinically significant adrenal insufficiency in adults. Steroid sparing agents may be considered for those on long-term inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

Comparison of effects of topical levocabastine and nedocromil sodium on the early response in a conjunctival provocation test with allergen.

BACKGROUND: Multiple ocular challenges or seasonal trials have demonstrated the efficacy of levocabastine and nedocromil sodium in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the protective effect of levocabastine eye drops with that of nedocromil in a conjunctival provocation test with allergen. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with allergic conjunctivitis to grass pollen were recruited. After a preliminary provocation to determine conjunctival reaction threshold (erythema of at least 50% of the conjunctiva with ocular itching), patients were randomized to receive either topical levocabastine (0.05%) or nedocromil (2%) 15 minutes before provocation. Erythema and pruritus intensity were recorded at each concentration of allergen up to the reaction threshold. RESULTS: The allergen concentration level necessary to reach reaction threshold was increased (p < 0.001) after treatment with both drugs. Comparison between screening and each treatment indicated that the shift in allergen concentration was significantly greater after levocabastine treatment than after nedocromil treatment (p = 0.019). Conjunctival itching (symptom score) and erythema (percent conjunctival surface) were also better controlled by levocabastine than by nedocromil during provocation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In a provocation test with allergen, levocabastine and nedocromil were both effective in increasing the conjunctival tolerance to allergen, with better protection provided by levocabastine.

Nedocromil sodium and airway inflammation in vivo and in vitro.

We conducted a series of studies investigating the antiinflammatory effects of nedocromil sodium, with particular reference to its effects on human bronchial epithelial cells and eosinophils in vitro and on eosinophils in vivo. Nedocromil sodium produced a dose-related inhibition of ozone-induced IL-8 release from human bronchial epithelial cells and also attenuated the release of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1. The culture medium from human bronchial epithelial cell cultures, containing the proinflammatory cytokines IL-8, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, "regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted," IL-1 beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, increased eosinophil chemotaxis and eosinophil adhesion to cultured human endothelial cells. The chemotaxis and increased adhesion were blocked in the presence of nedocromil sodium. The drug also abrogated the epithelial cell dysfunction (assessed as ciliary beat frequency) induced by the presence of activated eosinophils and blocked the release of eosinophil cationic protein from the eosinophils. We also conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of regular albuterol 200 micrograms or nedocromil sodium 4 mg, both given four times daily for 16 weeks, on inflammatory cell numbers in bronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Assessed in terms of total and activated eosinophils in biopsy samples, inflammation decreased with nedocromil sodium and was significantly different from a deterioration with albuterol, although neither of these changes was significantly different from that with placebo treatment. Levels of eosinophil cationic protein in bronchoalveolar lavage samples showed a similar trend.

Immunomodulation as asthma therapy: where do we stand?

There is increasing evidence that chronic inflammation in asthma is mediated via a network of cytokines emanating from inflammatory and structural cells in the airways. The prominent eosinophilic inflammation that characterizes asthma appears to be orchestrated by cytokines derived from type 2 T-helper (Th2)-like lymphocytes, suggesting that immunosuppressants might be beneficial in the control of asthma. Indeed, one of the critical modes of action of glucocorticoids in controlling asthma may be the suppression of Th2-lymphocyte-derived cytokines, such as interleukin-5 (IL-5). Cyclosporin-A may have a similar immunomodulatory role, but its potential beneficial effects are outweighed by its toxicity, at least when given parenterally. Future immunomodulators need to be more selective, either by means of delivery (inhalation, liposomes) or by a more specific effect on Th2, as opposed to Th1, lymphocytes or their products. Such approaches may include new immunomodulators, such as mycophenolate mofetil, specific cytokine inhibitors (such as interleukin-5 antibodies), endogenous suppressors of Th2 cells (interferon-gamma or interleukin-12), or type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitors.

A clinical overview of Tilarin.

Tilarin is a nasal spray containing 1% nedocromil sodium, a non-toxic pyranoquinoline dicarboxylate compound with potent antiallergic antiinflammatory properties. As a first-line topical treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) the pharmacokinetics of nedocromil sodium nasal formulation are such that it rivals sodium cromoglycate for safety. Less than 8% of the total dose of nedocromil sodium is systemically absorbed from the nasal mucosa, and this is reversibly bound to plasma proteins and is cleared rapidly from the circulation. Nedocromil sodium is eliminated unmetabolised in the urine and faeces, with an elimination half-life of 5.3 +/- 0.9 minutes. No significant adverse effects have been reported following intranasal administration of 1% nedocromil sodium four times daily, to a total of 964 patients with allergic rhinitis during clinical trials. Laboratory studies have shown that nedocromil sodium has a more wide-ranging pharmacological antiinflammatory profile than sodium cromoglycate and this is manifest in its clinical efficacy in allergic asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis. Analysis of pooled data from a series of double-blind, placebo-controlled group comparative studies in SAR patients demonstrated that, despite a significantly lower use of rescue antihistamines than with placebo treatment (31% reduction; p = 0.005), four times daily dosage with nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray significantly reduced daily symptoms of rhinitis (p < 0.001) and was considered effective by the majority of patients (p < 0.001). Specific examples of the therapeutic efficacy of nedocromil sodium compared with placebo in patients with grass or ragweed pollen SAR can be found in the literature. One ragweed study (1) included four times daily sodium cromoglycate 4% nasal spray as an active comparator and showed a consistent, if non-significant, trend in favour of nedocromil sodium 1%, which was the more effective drug in comparison to placebo. An Italian paediatric study (2) compared nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray with placebo in 149 children of whom 72% were under twelve years of age. After one week, the clinicians observed a significant reduction (p = 0.03) in sneezing with nedocromil sodium and after four weeks, patient (p < 0.01) and clinican (p < 0.001) opinions favoured the active treatment. Overall, the clinical profile of topical nedocromil sodium in SAR demonstrates fast relief of existing symptoms, sustained efficacy with four times daily use during peak pollen challenge, and a reduced need for concomitant symptomatic therapies. Nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray is well tolerated, with minimal side-effects, and is acceptable to a wide age-range of patients.

Comparative therapeutic studies with Tilavist.

Comparative clinical trials which include known therapies as well as placebos are essential in constructing a solid basis from which to 'launch' any new drug. This applies especially to eye drops for treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, where the symptomatology, already dependent on the vagaries of the natural pollen challenge season, is further influenced by a positive washing action of the placebo eye drops. Tilavist (2% nedocromil sodium ophthalmic solution) has therefore been compared with sodium cromoglycate eye drops and non-sedating antihistamine tablets, both mainstays in the treatment of seasonal allergy, in a series of double-masked, placebo-controlled, mainly multicentre studies. Nedocromil sodium, twice or four times daily, proved as effective overall as sodium cromoglycate (2% or 4% four times daily) in three seasonal trials, and was the more effective treatment in a study of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Its efficacy was most evident during peak periods of pollen challenge, when neither placebo nor sodium cromoglycate eye drops controlled breakthrough symptoms. Three further seasonal studies showed nedocromil sodium eye drops to be as effective as standard oral doses of astemizole and terfenadine, whilst a faster onset of action than terfenadine was reported in one multicentre study.

Current practice: diagnosis and treatment in primary healthcare.

In a primary healthcare facility, there are certain 'rules of thumb' that can be recommended for the diagnosis and treatment of conjunctivitis. The type of discharge is a crucial factor in the differential diagnosis and can also be a clue towards the management in primary care. It is important to identify whether the conjunctivitis is an isolated case or part of another disease, and if it is acute or chronic, and I would suggest taking a smear or culture sample whenever possible. When the aetiology is not clear, I would try antibiotics. If the patient is allergic, and an allergic conjunctivitis is suspected, the best management today is to use mast cell stabilisers, and combine these with conservative measures of frequent washings, and compresses. If the aetiology remains doubtful, or if there is no obvious improvement using these treatments, the patient should be re-evaluated and/or referred to an ophthalmologist or specialist eye centre. The use of corticosteroids for conjunctivitis should certainly be avoided in primary healthcare. Conjunctivitis is often self-limited and the drug-induced consequences of improper management can be far more devastating than the disease itself.