Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(39): e35159, 2023 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37773861

RESUMO

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is generally performed under general or regional anesthesia; however, it is rarely performed under local infiltration anesthesia (LIA). This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of Chinese mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for upper urinary calculi under LIA. A retrospective analysis of 52 patients with upper urinary stones who underwent MPCNL under LIA from April 2019 to May 2022 was performed. Pethidine and Phenergan were intramuscularly injected 30 minutes preoperatively. Oxybuprocaine hydrochloride gel was applied to the urethra for lubricating and mucosal anesthesia. Ropivacaine hydrochloride and lidocaine were injected into the whole percutaneous channel for local anesthesia. An 8/9.8F ureteroscope and an 18F vacuum-assisted access sheath were applied in MPCNL. All 52 patients tolerated procedures and underwent operations successfully; none of them converted the anesthesia method or required additional analgesia. The mean visual analogue scale scores intraoperatively and at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery were 3.25 ± 0.52, 3.13 ± 0.69, 2.25 ± 0.56, and 1.58 ± 0.50, respectively. The stone free rate was 84.6%. Complications were seen in 6 (11.5%) patients, including fever in 2 patients (Clavien I), renal colic in 1 patient (Clavien I), clinically insignificant bleeding in 2 patients (Clavien I), and urinary tract infection in 1 patient (Clavien II). No severe complications were observed in any patients. Chinese MPCNL under LIA was a feasible option and achieved good outcomes in appropriately selected patients, and it may become the routine procedure for general patients.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea , Nefrostomia Percutânea , Cálculos Urinários , Humanos , Anestesia Local/métodos , População do Leste Asiático , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cálculos Urinários/cirurgia
2.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 39(1): 78, 2023 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627447

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim was to compare laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of efficacy and safety for the treatment of renal pelvis stones larger than 2.5 cm in pediatric patients. METHODS: Our study consisted of two groups. Group 1 included 33 patients who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) between January 2013 and March 2022, and group 2 included 39 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The basic clinical parameters of the patients were recorded. Mean operation time, stone size, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative hospital stay, stone-free rate, postoperative analgesia requirements, intraoperative complications, and early and late postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In our study, the mean age of the patients in groups 1 and 2 was 8.89 ± 1.58 years and 9.1 ± 1.85 years, respectively (p = 0.657). The mean stone size was 2.37 ± 0.38 cm in group 1 and 2.55 ± 0.45 cm in group 2 (p = 0.64). The mean operation time was 85.65 ± 20.55 min in group 1, while it was 76.11 ± 13.12 min in group 2 (p = 0.08). The stone-free rate was 100% in both groups. Intraoperative mean blood loss, need for postoperative analgesia, blood transfusion and intraoperative complication rates were significantly higher in the PCNL group (p < 0.01, p = 0.02, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results show that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective method for pediatric patients with large kidney stones.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Laparoscopia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea , Nefrostomia Percutânea , Humanos , Criança , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Urolithiasis ; 49(2): 167-172, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839877

RESUMO

To demonstrate the feasibility of applying multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as an overnight surgery for treatment of complex kidney stones. We reviewed a prospectively collected database of all multiple-tract PCNL planned as overnight surgery performed by a single surgeon since 2018. A clinical pathway including the removal of nephrostomy tube and discharge on the morning after surgery was carried out. A definition for tube removal was outlined. Ability to adhere to the pathway and achieving the described parameters and whether any resulting complications occurred were determined. A total of 136 consecutive patients were enrolled with mean stone burden of 960.5 mm2 and 5.1 cm. Mean operative time was 71.7 ± 30.7 min. The average hemoglobin drop was 17.6 ± 12.2 g/L, and the incidence of drop > 25 g/L was 21.9%. Overall, 125 patients (91.9%) but 11 patients were discharge on postoperative day 1. One case required readmission. Among the 11 patients, 7 patients (5.1%) underwent a delayed tube removal (≥ 2 days) and 4 patients underwent complications after next-day nephrostomy tube removal, including renal colic (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and fever (1 case). Postoperative fever or severe hematuria was the major reason for delayed nephrostomy tube removal. The total complication rate was 8.8% (n = 12). Multiple-tract PCNL as an overnight surgery can be safely performed by experienced surgeons in most patients. An early nephrostomy tube removal could be achieved in nearly 95% patients.


Assuntos
Hematúria/epidemiologia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Cálculos Coraliformes/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Clínicos/normas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hematúria/diagnóstico , Hematúria/etiologia , Hematúria/urina , Hemoglobinas/análise , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Duração da Cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/sangue , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Cálculos Coraliformes/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Eur J Radiol ; 110: 142-147, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30599852

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous nephrostomy [1] has emerged as a pivotal approach in the therapeutic management of the obstructed urinary tract. A consecutive incorporation of ultrasonic and radiographic guidance, the approach experienced an almost ubiquitious distribution while most centers currently applying either one or both of these tools jointly. However, success of ultrasound-guidance is limited in obese patients and non-dilated uropathy. In turn, fluoroscopy usually requires an opacification of the urinary collecting system by intravenous or antegrade contrast media injection, which might be harmful for already impaired renal function, raise intrapelvic pressure and augment the risk of sepsis and hemorrhage. CT-guided PCN aids in overcoming these limitations. In the current study, we present the experience of a tertiary referral center with this technique. MATERIALS & METHODS: Epidemiological and clinical data of all patients treated with a CT-guided PCN of native kidneys at the University Hospital Frankfurt between October 2003 and October 2013 were retrospectively collected from the patient charts. Procedural parameters including radiological aspects, technical and therapeutic success, complication and mortality rate have been analyzed statistically. RESULTS: In total, 140 PCN procedures have been performed in 77 patients with a median age of 69 (± 13). The median body mass index was 27 with 66.6% of patients being overweight or obese. Charlson comorbidity index was 7 ranging 0-16. Indications for PCNs were obstructive uropathy (62.9), urine extravasation (22.9%), urinary tract fistulas (11.4%) and technical reasons (2.8%). In 68.8% of patients, initial diagnosis was malignancy. 56.4% of kidneys were non-dilated before puncture. In 78.4% prone position, otherwise supine oblique position (17.3%) or supine position (4.3%) was used. 71.4% of PCNs were carried out solely under local anesthesia. Technical success has been achieved in 90% with a complication rate of 3.6% (all grade minor B) and was not significantly different between dilated and non-dilated kidneys. 42.9% of fistulas and 64.3% of urinary tract leakages, healed after PCN placement. 30 days mortality rate was 5.2% without being directly associated with the PCN procedure itself. CONCLUSION: CT-guided PCN is a feasible approach associated with low morbidity. It is particularly useful in complex clinical scenarios e.g. critically ill, newly operated or obese patients as well as non-dilated kidneys. Moreover, it represents a minimally-invasive option for treating leakages and fistulas of the urinary tract.


Assuntos
Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Doenças Urológicas/cirurgia , Idoso , Anestesia Local , Dilatação Patológica/cirurgia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Obesidade/complicações , Sobrepeso/complicações , Radiografia Intervencionista , Insuficiência Renal/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Doenças Uretrais/cirurgia
5.
Actas urol. esp ; 42(6): 406-413, jul.-ago. 2018. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-174744

RESUMO

Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia de 2 técnicas diferentes, la litotricia por ondas de choque (LOC) frente a la supermini nefrolitotomía percutánea (SMP), en términos de éxito y tasas de complicaciones en cálculos renales pediátricos de tamaño < 25 mm. Pacientes y métodos: Se incluyeron un total de 219 niños (edades comprendidas entre uno y 17 años) sometidos a 2 modalidades de tratamiento diferentes (LOC vs. SMP) para cálculos renales < 25 mm. Dependiendo del tipo de procedimiento aplicado, los niños se dividieron en 2 grupos diferentes: grupo 1 (n = 108), formado por niños tratados con LOC, y grupo 2 (n = 111), integrado por niños tratados con SMP. Todos los parámetros relacionados con el tratamiento (tasas libres de cálculos, número de sesiones, duración del tratamiento, hospitalización, presencia de fragmentos residuales, complicaciones así como la necesidad de intervenciones adicionales) se observaron y evaluaron entre 2 grupos de forma comparativa. Resultados: La evaluación de nuestros datos ha demostrado claramente que el porcentaje de fragmentos residuales fue significativamente mayor en los casos sometidos a procedimiento de LOC en comparación con SMP. Aunque LOC requirió varias sesiones bajo anestesia general en un cierto porcentaje de los casos (54,6%), SMP tuvo éxito en una sesión en todos los casos. Por último, pero no por ello menos importante, además de las tasas de complicaciones menores similares observadas en ambos grupos de casos, no se observó ninguna complicación grave y ningún caso requirió transfusión de sangre después de estos 2 procedimientos, sin tasas significativas de descenso en los niveles de hemoglobina. Conclusiones: Aunque la LOC sigue siendo la modalidad de tratamiento preferida para la mayoría de los cálculos renales en niños por su naturaleza segura y no invasiva, la modalidad de SMP puede aplicarse como una alternativa valiosa en esta población específica de pacientes por sus excelentes tasas de ausencia de cálculos obtenidas en una sesión única y tasas de complicaciones aceptables en el manejo invasivo mínimo de cálculos < 25 mm


Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of 2 different techniques: shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) vs. super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP), in terms of success as well as complication rates in pediatric renal stones sizing < 25 mm. Patients and methods: A total of 219 children (aging between 1-17 years) undergoing 2 different treatment modalities (SWL vs. SMP) for kidney stones < 25 mm were included. Depending on the type of the procedure applied, children were divided into 2 different groups: group 1 (n = 108), children treated with SWL, and group 2 (n = 111), children treated with SMP. All treatment related parameters (stone free rates, number of sessions, treatment duration, hospitalization, presence of the residual fragments, complications as well as the need for additional interventions) were noted and evaluated between 2 groups in a comparative manner. Results: Evaluation of our data have clearly demonstrated that the percentage of residual fragments after SWL was significantly higher when compared with SMP. Although SWL required several sessions under general anesthesia in a certain per cent of the cases (54.6%), SMP was successful in one session in all of the cases. Last but not least, in addition to the similar minor complication rates observed in both group of cases, no major complication observed in any case and no case in both groups again required blood transfusion after these 2 procedures with no significant drop rates in hemoglobin levels. Conclusions:Although SWL is still the preferred treatment modality for the majority of kidney stones in children due to its safe and non-invasive nature, SMP modality may be applied as a valuable alternative in this specific patient population for its excellent stone free rates obtained in a single session and acceptable complication rates in the minimal invasive management of stones < 25 mm


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Cálculos Renais/epidemiologia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Litotripsia a Laser/métodos , Urolitíase/cirurgia , Miniaturização/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento , Avaliação de Eficácia-Efetividade de Intervenções , Liberação de Cirurgia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos
6.
J Endourol ; 29(6): 725-9, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25365030

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We created an Internet-based survey of patients treated for urolithiasis to evaluate for trends in treatment, outcome, and patient satisfaction and to establish internet surveys as a feasible medium for future research of patient urolithiasis treatment experiences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the website "kidneystoners.org" to disseminate the online survey, which queried respondents on treatment type, outcome, and satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was correlated with treatment type and outcome. Chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare responses between treatment types. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-three respondents completed the survey. The majority (46%) were treated ureteroscopically, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL, 25%) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (7%). Other treatments included spontaneous passage (13%), medical expulsive therapy (7%), and home remedies (2%). Sixty-four percent of respondents deemed their treatment "successful," while 36% reported their treatment as either "partially successful" or "unsuccessful." Unsuccessful treatment was more likely for SWL (17%) and home remedies (14%) (p=0.002). Most respondents (52%) reported being either satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment choice. Satisfaction did not vary significantly by treatment type, but was significantly associated with treatment success (mean satisfaction 3.8/5 for "successful" vs 1.9/5 for "unsuccessful" treatment; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Use of the Internet allows rapid gathering of patient information from a large geographic distribution. Our survey is consistent with previous studies in demonstrating an increased use of ureteroscopy to treat both renal and ureteral calculi. In general, patients are satisfied with treatment outcomes despite a large percentage of people reporting needing to have secondary procedures.


Assuntos
Internet , Litotripsia/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Adulto , California , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Endourol ; 28(11): 1299-303, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24964217

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pain at the surgery site is a common complaint in patients who experience percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial is evaluation of the effect of scheduled infusion of bupivacaine on postsurgical pain and narcotic consumption after tubeless PCNL under spinal anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were randomly divided into two groups. A small caliber fenestrated feeding tube was placed into the nephrostomy tract under direct vision in a manner in which its tip lied close to the renal capsule. The study group received infusion of diluted bupivacaine while physiologic saline was injected in the control group. Each patient was given the same dose every 6 hours until 24 hours after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: Mean pethidine injection was significantly lower in the group who underwent bupivacaine instillation (20.5±14.5 vs 3.97±2.4 mg: P=0.009). There was no significant difference between mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score in these two groups after 6 and 12 hours while it was significantly lower after 18 and 24 hours in the patients who had received bupivacaine. Mean time to the first analgesic request was significantly longer in the study group (11.35 vs 6.44 hours: P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Intermittent perirenal instillation of bupivacaine via the nephrostomy tract after PCNL decreases the need for more systemic narcotics and provides acceptable analgesia in the postoperative period.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Raquianestesia , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meperidina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
Urologiia ; (4): 19-20, 22-3, 2013.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24159759

RESUMO

Minimally invasive surgeries in patients with urolithiasis are not always successful. Prevention of inflammatory and cicatrical-sclerotic complications in the postoperative period plays an important role. 49 patients with urolithiasis divided into two groups were followed-up. The study group included 25 patients who underwent percutaneous puncture nephrolitholapaxy. The control group consisted of 24 patients with a history of percutaneous puncture nephrolitholapaxy. In postoperative period, active prevention of inflammation and cicatrical-sclerotic complications using drug Longidaza in combination with magnetic-laser therapy was performed in study group. The control group received standard treatment. 6 months after surgery, 1 (4%) patient in the study group had pyeloectasis approximately 2 cm and obstruction of UPJ of operated kidney, which required re-treatment with Longidaza. In the control group, pyeloectasis and violation of passage through the upper urinary tract were recorded in 4 (16.7%) patients. These data allow to recommend a comprehensive prevention of postoperative inflammation and cicatrical-sclerotic complications using Longidaza and magnetic-laser therapy in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery of the kidney.


Assuntos
Hialuronoglucosaminidase/uso terapêutico , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Magnetoterapia/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Urolitíase/reabilitação , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hialuronoglucosaminidase/administração & dosagem , Litotripsia/métodos , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Urolitíase/cirurgia
13.
Urology ; 82(5): 1020-5, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23992963

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in treating upper urinary calculi under local infiltration anesthesia. METHODS: A series of 2000 patients with upper urinary calculi underwent PCNL under local infiltration anesthesia. Of the 2000 patients, 536 had upper ureteral calculi, 805 patients had pelvic calculi, and 659 patients had complex renal calculi. Pethidine premedication (75-100 mg) and Phenergan (25 mg) were used half an hour preoperatively. The mean pain scores at 0, 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, the demographic characteristics, and the stones characteristics were evaluated to determine the feasibility. The complications were evaluated to determine the safety, and stone-free rate was evaluated to determine effectivity. RESULTS: The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 1.55 ± 0.54 (range, 1-3). The mean operative time was 48 minutes (range, 20-125). The mean Visual Analogue Scale scores at 0, 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively were 3.62, 3.02, 2.27, and 2.09, respectively. The mean hemoglobin drop was 1.06 g/dL (range, 0.2-6.8). Sixty-five patients (3.3%) received transfusions, 10 patients (0.5%) required selective renal angioembolism (Clavien grade II), and 1 patient (0.05%) received chest drainage therapy (Clavien grade II). The total stone-free rate was 85.8%. CONCLUSION: Local infiltration anesthesia is a well-tolerated alternative anesthesia technique that provides effective intraoperative and postoperative analgesia for PCNL. PCNL performed under local infiltration anesthesia in a selected group of patients is feasible and provides satisfactory clinical outcomes. Comparative studies should be performed to classify efficacy, safety, tract quantity, dilation method, and the best candidates.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Cálculos Urinários/cirurgia , Adjuvantes Anestésicos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , China , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meperidina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Prometazina/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Urology ; 82(3): 526-31, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23831069

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine infiltrations into the nephrostomy tract in tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled study enrolled 121 patients. Patients were randomized to receive a 20-mL infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine into the nephrostomy tract after PCNL. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The group 1 patients received bupivacaine infiltrations, whereas group 2 did not. Patients' visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Pain in the postoperative period was managed with intramuscular diclofenac sodium (75 mg) or meperidine (pethidine) hydrochloride (50 mg), as requested by the patients. RESULTS: The patients were a mean age of 43.2 ± 12.7 years (range, 18-74 years). The VAS pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively and the amount of diclofenac sodium needed were significantly less in the group with bupivacaine infiltration than in those that did not receive the infiltration (P <.05). The VAS pain scores in patients with tubeless PCNL were significantly lower than those in patients with standard PCNL (P <.05). CONCLUSION: The pain after tubeless and standard PCNL may be decreased by bupivacaine infiltration into the nephrostomy tract. The findings of the present study reveal that a tubeless procedure and local analgesic infiltration into the nephrostomy tract after the PCNL is the more comfortable procedure for the patients.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/uso terapêutico , Diclofenaco/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meperidina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
15.
Urolithiasis ; 41(4): 323-6, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23743991

RESUMO

The treatment of urolithiasis has changed dramatically over the past several decades. Novel technologies have led to new management protocols. Percutaneous chemolysis as a primary or adjuvant treatment for urinary tract stones has widely been neglected. We present our own experience with it and discuss it in the light of an extensive literature review. From a MEDLINE search on percutaneous chemolysis we evaluated the most important studies, a total of 58 articles, 43 case series and 15 review articles. In our unit between 2001 and 2011, 29 patients (mean age 62 years) with infectious staghorn calculi were treated with adjuvant percutaneous chemolysis post-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. There were 17 women, with 10 complete and 14 partial staghorn stones (mean size 32 mm). Patients were generally deemed at high risk to undergo another procedure in the future. Suby G solution was used following an established protocol. Sixteen patients (55.1 %) were stone free after chemolysis, eight stones showed partial dissolution, half of them with so-called "insignificant" residual fragments <4 mm. Patients with residual stones underwent SWL. Mean follow-up was 5.25 years (1-11). One stone-free patient (6 %) and three of eight patients (37.5 %) with residual fragments post local chemolysis, developed new stones during follow-up. The often neglected percutaneous chemolysis represents a significant and effective.


Assuntos
Urolitíase/terapia , Cálcio/química , Carbonato de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Citratos/administração & dosagem , Cistina/química , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Litotripsia/métodos , Óxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Ácido Úrico/química , Urolitíase/metabolismo
16.
Urology ; 81(6): 1147-52, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23506727

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To suggest minipercutaneous ureterolithotripsy using the mininephroscope as an alternative process for impacted stones of the upper ureter because these stones can be challenging to treat and can produce severe symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report our results of cases in which the percutaneous approach using 2-step minipercutaneous ureteroscopy with the mininephroscope was used to achieve relief from the stone, with minimal anesthesia risks. A total of 54 patients (33 men and 21 women) presented with impacted stones in the proximal ureter. The mean stone size was 16.2 mm (range 10-21). All patients were treated with 2-step minipercutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy under multimodal analgesia. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 49 minutes (range 40-110). Placement of the percutaneous drainage tube was quick and was performed with the patient under local anesthesia. The minipercutaneous session followed several days later, with the patient under multimodal anesthesia. The initial stone-free rate was 94%. The stone-free rate 2 months after the procedure was 100%. All procedures were well tolerated by the patients (group mean visual analog scale score 3.1 ± 0.7 standard deviation). No severe adverse events were noted. The mean hospital stay was 5.3 days (range 3-12). CONCLUSION: In selected emergency cases of impacted proximal ureteral stones, the approach of the initial insertion of a nephrostomy tube followed by a second session of antegrade ureterolithotripsy using the mininephroscope is a safe and effective alternative treatment, especially, because it can be accomplished with minimal anesthesia requirements.


Assuntos
Litotripsia/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Lidocaína , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Duração da Cirurgia , Dor/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação , Adulto Jovem
17.
Actas urol. esp ; 36(10): 613-619, nov.-dic. 2012. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-106656

RESUMO

Introducción: La colocación de un tubo de nefrostomía percutánea (NPC) se realiza generalmente en los Servicios de Radiología de todo el mundo. Sin embargo, hay unos pocos estudios dirigidos a urólogos sobre la NPC realizada con guía ecográfica. La dirección de la aguja utilizando una sonda de ecografía abdominal convexa puede ser difícil en manos inexpertas. Para realizar este procedimiento de manera sencilla proponemos que serían útiles una sonda colocada en el flanco o la región intercostal, y un director de aguja ranurada larga que no permita el movimiento de la aguja. Se consideró que una sonda para ecografía transrectal (ETR) era adecuada para resolver este problema. Material y método: Desde enero de 2007 hasta abril de 2011 se realizaron un total de 113 accesos renales percutáneos (ARP) utilizando una sonda de ETR en 102 pacientes, de 20 a 84 años de edad. Debido a la insuficiente capacidad de imagen de la sonda de ETR en pacientes obesos, con un índice de masa corporal (IMC) mayor de 30kg/m2, estos fueron excluidos. Se realizaron 42 ARP bajo anestesia local, y a este grupo se le llamó grupo de anestesia local (AL). Se realizaron 71 ARP para la inserción de la nefrostomía bajo anestesia local, complementados con sedación profunda, y a este grupo se le denominó grupo de sedación profunda (SP). Resultados: Se llevó a cabo la punción dirigida al cáliz y la colocación de alambre de guía en todos los pacientes (100%), pero la tasa de éxito de la inserción del tubo en cada grupo fue diferente. La tasa de inserción exitosa de la NPC fue del 69,1% (29 de 42 casos) en el grupo de AL y del 95,8% (68 de 71 casos) en el grupo de SP. No se observó lesión vascular mayor y/o lesión de órganos adyacentes al intestino, el hígado, el bazo o el pulmón en ningún paciente. Conclusión: La orientación de la sonda para ETR, la sedación profunda y los dilatadores modificados pueden ofrecer una alta tasa de éxito para los urólogos con poca experiencia en la inserción de la NPC, que de de otro modo les resultaría difícil realizar (AU)


Introduction: Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube placement is generally performed in radiologic departments worldwide. However, there are a few urologist-directed studies about PCN performed with ultrasound guidance. Needle direction using a convex abdominal ultrasound probe might be difficult in unexperienced hands. In order to perform this procedure easily, we propose that a probe placed on flank or intercostal region and a long grooved needle director that never allows needle movement would be useful. We considered a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe was suitable to resolve this issue. Material and method: From January 2007 to April 2011, a total of 113 percutaneous renal access (PRA) were performed using a TRUS probe in 102 patients, aged 20 to 84 years old. Because of the insufficient imaging capability of the TRUS probe in obese patients whose body mass index (BMI) greater than 30kg/m2 were excluded. Forty two PRA were performed under local anesthesia and this group was named local anesthesia (LA) group. Seventy one PRA were performed for nephrostomy insertion under local anesthesia supplemented by deep sedation and this cluster was named deep sedation (DS) group. Results: Targeted calyx puncture and guide wire placement was performed in all patients (100%) but success rate of tube insertion in each group was different. Successful PCN insertion rate was 69.1% (29 of 42 cases) in LA group and 95.8% (68 of 71 cases) in DS group. No major vascular injury and/or adjacent organ injury to bowel, liver, spleen or lung was seen in any patient. Conclusion: Guidance of TRUS probe, deep sedation, and modified dilators may offer a high success rate to the urologists with little experience in PCN insertion which they would find it difficult to perform (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea , Urologia/instrumentação , Urologia , /educação , /métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Sedação Profunda/métodos , Cefalosporinas , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/tendências , /instrumentação , /tendências , Sistema Urinário/patologia , Sistema Urinário
18.
Urology ; 80(4): 938-40, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22921707

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The most important factor that increases the cost of percutaneous surgery is the disposable instruments used for the surgery. In this study we present the advantages of using an intravenous cannula instead of a percutaneous access needle for renal access. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Recently, percutaneous stone surgery has grown in use in pediatric cases and is considered a minimally invasive surgery. The most important step in this surgery is access to the renal collecting systems. Although fluoroscopy has been used frequently at this stage, the use of ultrasound has recently increased. During percutaneous accesses under all types of imaging techniques, disposable 11- to 15-cm-long 18-ga needles are used. In pediatric cases, these longer needles are difficult to use. Using disposable materials in percutaneous nephrolithotomy increases the cost of the procedure. Therefore, we asserted that percutaneous access especially in pediatric cases could be performed using a 16-ga intravenous cannula (angiocath). Indeed, percutaneous access was performed successfully, especially in pediatric preschool patients. Shorter needle length, easy skin entry, comfort of manipulation, clear visualization of the metal needle on ultrasound, and wide availability can be considered advantages of this method. The angiocath is also less expensive than a percutaneous access needle. CONCLUSION: Angiocath is inexpensive, easily available, and practical, and it is the shortest needle to perform percutaneous access in pediatric patients.


Assuntos
Catéteres , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/economia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos
19.
Urology ; 79(2): 293-7, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22001100

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of high-power holmium: yttrium aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy for multitract modified minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in the treatment of patients with large staghorn renal calculi. METHODS: A randomized, prospective study was conducted. Two-hundred seventy-three consecutive patients (291 renal units) with large staghorn renal calculi were randomized to undergo multitract MPCNL with 30-W low-power or 70-W high-power Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Both groups were compared in terms of perioperative findings and postoperative outcomes, including procedure time, stone-free rate, length of hospital stay, transfusion rates, renal function recovery, and other complications. RESULTS: The average patient age was 49.2 years (range 22-73) and mean stone size was 5.54±0.7 cm. The 2 groups had some comparable perioperative findings and outcome, including tracts required per operated renal unit (n), blood loss, postoperative fever, postoperative hospital stay, stone-free rate, and improvement of operated renal function. The operation time in the high-power group was significantly shorter than that in the low-power group (129.20±17.2 vs 105.18±14.2, P<.01). CONCLUSION: A combination of multitract MPCNL and high-power Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy can greatly decrease the operative time without increasing the intraoperative complications or delaying postoperative renal function recovery when compared with low-power Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Litotripsia a Laser/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Nefrolitíase/radioterapia , Nefrolitíase/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
20.
World J Urol ; 29(6): 773-7, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21779834

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) under peritubal local infiltration anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2007 to December 2009, 88 patients with upper urinary calculi underwent MPCNL with ultrasonography (US)-guided renal access in the lateral decubitus flank position under peritubal local infiltration anesthesia. All patients were informed about the possibility of experiencing short periods of discomfort or pain and completed visual analog pain scale (VAS) questionnaires during the intra-operation and at 4, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Postoperative narcotic usage was recorded at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (93.2%, 82/88) underwent MPCNL under local anesthetic infiltration, 6 patients were converted to general anesthesia (2.2%, 2/88) or epidural anesthesia (4.4%, 4/88) because of serious pain or discomfort. The average VAS scores intra-operation and at 4, 24, and 48 h postoperatively were 3.1, 3.0, 2.4, and 2.1, respectively. Six patients (7.3%, 6/82) and 2 patients (2.4%, 2/82) were administered pethidine (75 mg) at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, respectively. The stone clearance rate was 88.3% (91/103) before discharge with MPCNL mono-therapy. The mean operative time was 89 min (range 56-145 min). CONCLUSION: MPCNL under peritubal local infiltration anesthesia is well-tolerated and feasible alternative to the same procedure under general or epidural anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Cálculos Urinários/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA