La dieta y el cáncer de próstata - un enfoque holístico a la gestión / Diet and prostate cancer - a holistic approach to management

Existen cada vez más pruebas de las encuestas epidemiológicas y de los estudios de laboratorio, la intervención y de control de casos, de que la dieta y el estilo de vida juegan un papel fundamental en la biología del cáncer de próstata y la génesis tumoral. Esto se aplica a ambos desarrollo y progresión del cáncer de próstata, aunque en muchos casos los factores iniciales específicos en la dieta son poco conocidos. Por el contrario, muchos nutrientes y hierbas también muestran una promesa significativa para ayudar a tratar el cáncer de próstata al disminuir la progresión y reducir la recurrencia, en última instancia, reduciendo el riesgo de morbilidad y mortalidad de la enfermedad. Además en todos los grados del cáncer de próstata, los controles nutricionales complementan el tratamiento convencional para mejorar la respuesta y la calidad de vida. Frenar o incluso revertir la progresión de la neoplasia intraepitelial prostática de alto grado [HGPIN]), con agentes de quimioterapia preventiva podrían ser la mejor defensa primaria contra el cáncer de próstata, evitando que se produzca en primer lugar. La información contenida en esta revisión sobre la quimio-prevención del cáncer de próstata resume la evidencia clave del papel de los diferentes componentes de la dieta y su efecto en la prevención y progresión del cáncer de próstata. La mayoría de los agentes nutricionales quimio-preventivos también poseen la ventaja añadida de ser beneficiosos para el sistema cardiovascular, salud de los huesos y para la prevención de otros tipos de cáncer(AU)

There is now increasing evidence from epidemiologic surveys and from laboratory, intervention, and case-control studies that diet and lifestyle plays a crucial role in prostate cancer biology and tumorigenesis. This applies to both the development and progression of prostate cancer, although in many cases the specific initiating factors in the diet are poorly understood. Conversely, many nutrients and herbs also show significant promise in helping to treat prostate cancer by slowing progression and reducing recurrence, ultimately reducing the risk of morbidity and mortality from the disease. Furthermore for all grades of prostate cancer, nutritional interventions complement conventional treatment to improve response and quality of life. Slowing or even reversing the progression of, high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia [HGPIN]). with chemo-preventative agents could be the best primary defense against prostate cancer, preventing it from occurring in the first place. The information given in this review about prostate cancer chemoprevention summarizes the key evidence for the role of different dietary components and their effect on prostate cancer prevention and progression. Most nutritional chemoprevention agents also have the added benefit of being beneficial for the cardiovascular system, bone health and for the prevention of other cancers(AU)

Pathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Pathologic T0 Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: We evaluated the pathologic characteristics and prognosis of pathologic T0 (pT0) prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1,196 consecutive men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 1992 and November 2008, 34 patients (mean age, 68.8+/-7.9 years; range, 48-85) had pT0 PC. They were categorized into 4 groups according to neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) and diagnostic methods. The initial PSA, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor (5alphaRI), Gleason score of prostatic needle biopsy (PNB) or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), clinical stage, and presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia were evaluated. Clinical and biochemical progression were also evaluated. RESULTS: 34 patients were categorized into 4 groups (Group I: 9 without NHT, diagnosed by PNB [1.1%]; Group II: 8 without NHT, diagnosed by TURP [11.3%]; Group III: 16 with NHT, diagnosed by PNB [5.5%]; Group IV: 1 with NHT, diagnosed by TURP [3.8%]). Group I had serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)<15.0 ng/ml, one positive biopsy core, and a Gleason score< or =7. Group II had serum PSA<10.1 ng/ml, chips involved with cancer<10.0%, and a Gleason score< or =6. There were more patients taking 5alphaRI and high-grade PIN among patients without NHT. None of patients with pathologic pT0 PC had clinical or biochemical progression during follow-up, except 3 patients with NHT (mean, 22 months; range, 2-105 months). CONCLUSIONS: Patients without NHT had more favorable clinical and pathologic results. In our study, except for 3 patients with NHT, all patients had undetectable PSA levels after RP. We need more time for follow-up to conclude whether the prognosis of pT0 PC is favorable.

Adenocarcinoma incidental de próstata en resección transuretral por causa benigna: Hospital de San José, julio 2006 a marzo 2008 / Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma during transurethral resection for a bening cause: San Jose Hospital, july 2006 - march 2008

La resección transuretral de próstata es un procedimiento común para tratar patologías urinarias obstructivas benignas. Al material obtenido se le practica estudio histológico para confirmar la naturaleza benigna, pero en algunos casos se ha encontrado como hallazgo incidental un adenocarcinoma en estadios tempranos. No se sabe con claridad cuánto material debe procesarse o si la cantidad de tejido examinado aumenta la posibilidad de encontrar cáncer. El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar la frecuencia de adenocarcinoma incidental de próstata en pacientes sometidos a RTU por causa benigna. Reune 196 casos de RTU en los que se procesó en una segunda fase todo el tejido restante obtenido, describiendo las variables edad, peso del espécimen, número de láminas procesadas, niveles de PSA y categoría diagnóstica, la cual fue clasificada como negativa para maglinidad, PIN alto de grado y adenocarcinoma de próstata estadios T1a y T1b. Se encontró que la frecuencia de cáncer próstata en pacientes a quienes se les realizó RTU por hiperplasia prostática benigna en el Hospital de San José fue muy baja, dos pacientes de 71 y 80 años, además de otro que corresponde a una neoplasia intraepitelial de alto grado (PIN de AG) con niveles normales de PSA, lo que evidencia que la frecuencia es menor que la reportada en la literatura internacional.

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a common procedure performed to treat benign urinary obstruction conditions. The specimen obtained undergoes hystologic work-up to confirm benign nature, but in some cases, an early-stage adenocarcinoma is found incidentally. It is not clearly known how much material must be processed or if the amount of tissue examined increases likelihood of finding cancer. The purpose of this work is to determine the frequency rate of incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients who undergo TURP for a benign cause. It gathers 196 cases of TURP in which all the remaining tissue obtained underwent a second phase work-out, considering variables as age, weight of specimen, number of slides processed, PSA levels and diagnostic category, which was classified as negative for malignancy, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma in stages T1a and T1b. It was evidenced that the frequency of prostate cancer in patients who underwent TURP for benign prostatic hyperplasia at the San José Hospital was very low, consisting of two patients 71 and 80 years old, as well as one that corresponds to a high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN of AG) with normal PSA levels, which evidences that our frequency rate is smaller than that reported in international literature.