Growth rates and histopathological outcomes of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps based on CT colonography surveillance and endoscopic removal.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The natural history of small polyps is not well established and rests on limited evidence from barium enema studies decades ago. Patients with one or two small polyps (6-9 mm) at screening CT colonography (CTC) are offered CTC surveillance at 3 years but may elect immediate colonoscopy. This practice allows direct observation of the growth of subcentimetre polyps, with histopathological correlation in patients undergoing subsequent polypectomy. DESIGN: Of 11 165 asymptomatic patients screened by CTC over a period of 16.4 years, 1067 had one or two 6-9 mm polyps detected (with no polyps ≥10 mm). Of these, 314 (mean age, 57.4 years; M:F, 141:173; 375 total polyps) elected immediate colonoscopic polypectomy, and 382 (mean age 57.0 years; M:F, 217:165; 481 total polyps) elected CTC surveillance over a mean of 4.7 years. Volumetric polyp growth was analysed, with histopathological correlation for resected polyps. Polyp growth and regression were defined as volume change of ±20% per year, with rapid growth defined as +100% per year (annual volume doubling). Regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of advanced histology, defined as the presence of cancer, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or villous components. RESULTS: Of the 314 patients who underwent immediate polypectomy, 67.8% (213/314) harboured adenomas, 2.2% (7/314) with advanced histology; no polyps contained cancer or HGD. Of 382 patients who underwent CTC surveillance, 24.9% (95/382) had polyps that grew, while 62.0% (237/382) remained stable and 13.1% (50/382) regressed in size. Of the 58.6% (224/382) CTC surveillance patients who ultimately underwent colonoscopic resection, 87.1% (195/224) harboured adenomas, 12.9% (29/224) with advanced histology. Of CTC surveillance patients with growing polyps who underwent resection, 23.2% (19/82) harboured advanced histology vs 7.0% (10/142) with stable or regressing polyps (OR: 4.0; p<0.001), with even greater risk of advanced histology in those with rapid growth (63.6%, 14/22, OR: 25.4; p<0.001). Polyp growth, but not patient age/sex or polyp morphology/location were significant predictors of advanced histology. CONCLUSION: Small 6-9 mm polyps present overall low risk to patients, with polyp growth strongly associated with higher risk lesions. Most patients (75%) with small 6-9 mm polyps will see polyp stability or regression, with advanced histology seen in only 7%. The minority of patients (25%) with small polyps that do grow have a 3-fold increased risk of advanced histology.

In Patients Undergoing CRS/HIPEC for Colorectal Adenocarcinoma with Peritoneal Metastases, Presence of Ascites on Computed Tomography Imaging is not a Prognostic Marker for Survival.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). Patient selection is key to optimizing outcomes after CRS/HIPEC. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of ascites diagnosed on preoperative imaging. METHODS: A prospective database of patients eligible for CRS/HIPEC between 2010 and 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. The presence of ascites, postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and completeness of cytoreduction were assessed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors for outcome. RESULTS: Of the 235 included patients, 177 (75%) underwent CRS/HIPEC while 58 (25%) were not eligible for CRS/HIPEC. In 42 of the 177 patients (24%) who underwent CRS/HIPEC, ascites was present on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score was significantly higher in patients with preoperative ascites compared with patients without (11 [range 2-30] vs. 9 [range 0-28], respectively; p = 0.011) and complete cytoreduction was more often achieved in patients without ascites (96.3% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in median DFS and OS after CRS/HIPEC between patients with and without ascites {10 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.1-12.9) vs. 9 months (95% CI 7.2-10.8), and 25 months (95% 9.4-40.6) vs. 27 months (95% CI 22.4-31.6), respectively}. CONCLUSIONS: Ascites on preoperative imaging was not associated with worse survival in CRS/HIPEC patients with CRPM. Therefore, excluding patients from CRS/HIPEC based merely on the presence of ascites is not advisable.

Computed tomographic colonography versus double-contrast barium enema for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether or not computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a viable alternative to double-contrast barium enema (BE) for a preoperative rectal cancer evaluation. METHODS: The size and distance from the anal canal to the lower or upper tumor borders were laterally measured in 147 patients who underwent CTC and BE. Measurements were grouped into early cancer, advanced, and after chemoradiation therapy (CRT). RESULTS: In the early and advanced cancer groups, all lesions were visualized by BE. In contrast, 3 (7.8%) early and 8 (7.3%) advanced cases, located at the anterior wall near the anal canal, were not visualized by CTC because of liquid level formation. In the CRT group, 16 (23.5%) and 4 (5.8%) cases were not visualized by CTC and BE, respectively. The BE and CTC size measurements were similar among cohorts. However, the distance from the anal canal's superior margin tended to be longer with BE, especially in early cancer. The differences in distance from the anal canal were significantly larger in the early cancer group than in the other two groups (p = 0.0024). CONCLUSION: CTC may be a viable alternative imaging modality in some cases. However, BE should be employed in anterior wall cases near the anal canal and CRT cases.

Impact of the clinical use of artificial intelligence-assisted neoplasia detection for colonoscopy: a large-scale prospective, propensity score-matched study (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently, the use of computer-aided detection (CADe) for colonoscopy has been investigated to improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a regulatory-approved CADe in a large-scale study with high numbers of patients and endoscopists. METHODS: This was a propensity score-matched prospective study that took place at a university hospital between July 2020 and December 2020. We recruited patients aged ≥20 years who were scheduled for colonoscopy. Patients with polyposis, inflammatory bowel disease, or incomplete colonoscopy were excluded. We used a regulatory-approved CADe system and conducted a propensity score matching-based comparison of the ADR between patients examined with and without CADe as the primary outcome. RESULTS: During the study period, 2261 patients underwent colonoscopy with the CADe system or routine colonoscopy, and 172 patients were excluded in accordance with the exclusion criteria. Thirty endoscopists (9 nonexperts and 21 experts) were involved in this study. Propensity score matching was conducted using 5 factors, resulting in 1836 patients included in the analysis (918 patients in each group). The ADR was significantly higher in the CADe group than in the control group (26.4% vs 19.9%, respectively; relative risk, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.57); however, there was no significant increase in the advanced neoplasia detection rate (3.7% vs 2.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the CADe system for colonoscopy significantly increased the ADR in a large-scale prospective study including 30 endoscopists (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000040677.).

Scaling of computed tomography body composition to height: relevance of height-normalized indices in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Body weight scales to height with a power of ≈2 (weight/height2 ), forming the basis of body mass index (BMI). The corresponding scaling of body composition measured by abdominal computed tomography (CT) to height has not been established. The objective of this analysis was to quantify the scaling of body composition measured by a single-slice axial abdominal CT image (skeletal muscle, and visceral, subcutaneous, and total adipose tissue) to height in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included non-Hispanic white males and females, aged 18-80 years, who were diagnosed with stage I-III CRC at an integrated health care system in North America between January 2006 and December 2011. Body composition was measured by a single-slice axial CT image of the third lumbar vertebra and analysed with a semi-automated threshold segmentation procedure. Allometric regression models were used to quantify height scaling powers (ß ± standard error) for each body composition measure, adjusted for age, for males and females. An interaction test was used to determine if height scaling powers were statistically significantly different between males and females. RESULTS: Among 2036 subjects, the mean (standard deviation) age was 64 ± 11 years, 1008 (49.5%) were female, and the mean (standard deviation) BMI was 27.9 ± 5.4 kg/m2 . Powers for skeletal muscle area were 1.06 ± 0.12 for males and 0.80 ± 0.12 for females (P = 0.049). Powers for visceral adipose tissue area were 1.81 ± 0.64 for males and 0.57 ± 0.79 for females (P = 0.16). Powers for subcutaneous adipose tissue area were 2.04 ± 0.42 for males and 0.81 ± 0.45 for females (P = 0.056). Powers for total abdominal adipose tissue area were 1.80 ± 0.46 for males and 0.76 ± 0.50 for females (P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Body composition measured by single-slice axial abdominal CT, particularly muscle area, scales to height with age-adjusted powers that are different than 2 and are distinct between males and females. These observations may have implications for the development of height-adjusted body composition indices in patients with cancer.

Role of barium enema examination for the diagnosis of submucosal invasion depth in T1 colorectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: The indication for endoscopic resection for submucosally invasive colorectal cancer (T1-CRC) depends on the preoperative diagnosis of invasion depth. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the association between barium enema examination (BE) profile views and depth of submucosal (SM) invasion in CRCs. METHODS: We reviewed the radiographic and endoscopic findings of 145 T1-CRCs diagnosed from 2008 to 2019. We measured the widths of horizontal and vertical rigidity under a BE profile view corresponding to CRC and compared the values with SM invasion depth. Horizontal rigidity was defined as the horizontal length and vertical rigidity as the vertical width of the barium defect corresponding to each target lesion. The most appropriate cut-off values for predicting SM invasion ≥1.8 mm were calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Values of horizontal rigidity (r = 0.626, P < 0.05) and vertical rigidity (r = 0.482, P < 0.05) correlated significantly with SM invasion depth. The most appropriate cut-off values for the prediction of SM invasion depth ≥ 1.8 mm were 4.5 mm for horizontal rigidity, with an accuracy of 80.7%; and 0.7 mm for vertical rigidity, with an accuracy of 77.9%. The prevalence of lympho-vascular invasion was significantly different when those cut-off values were applied (43.2% vs. 17.5% for horizontal rigidity, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In T1-CRC, values of horizontal and vertical rigidities under a BE profile view were correlated with SM invasion depth. While the accuracy of the rigidities for the prediction of SM invasion depth ≥ 1.8 mm was not high, horizontal rigidity may be predictive of lympho-vascular invasion, thus aiding in therapeutic decision-making.

Is barium enema examination negligible for the management of colorectal cancer? Comparison with conventional colonoscopy and magnifying colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical value of barium enema (BE) examination for the management of colorectal epithelial neoplasms. METHODS: We reviewed the colonoscopy records at our institution from 2014 to 2019 and identified cases of endoscopically or surgically resected colorectal epithelial neoplasms evaluated by BE, conventional colonoscopy, magnifying narrow-band imaging colonoscopy (M-NBI), and magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE). The yield of each modality for the diagnosis of massively submucosal invasive (mSM) colorectal cancer was evaluated by a receiver-operating characteristic analysis including the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: We analyzed the records of 105 patients (17 adenomas, 53 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), and 35 cancers). Smooth surface, irregularity in depression, and eccentric deformity on the profile view with BE were observed more frequently in mSM cancers than adenomas/HGDs/slightly submucosal invasive cancers (p < 0.01). The AUC of BE was 0.8355, the value of which was not different from the other three modalities (conventional colonoscopy 0.7678; M-NBI 0.7835; MCE 0.8376). Although the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of BE were lower than those of M-NBI and MCE, the sensitivity and NPV of BE were the highest among the four types of examinations. CONCLUSION: BE is still available and may serve as a supplementary modality for the diagnosis of mSM cancers.

Predicting early necrosis of colorectal liver metastases using volumetric enhancement on baseline MRI and oil deposition on post-cTACE unenhanced CT.

PURPOSE: To predict tumor necrosis after conventional TACE (cTACE) in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) based on volumetric oil deposition on CT one day after treatment. METHODS: Thirty-four lesions in 20 men and 6 women were included in this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant, retrospective lesion-by-lesion-based study. Semiautomatic volumetric segmentation of target lesions was performed on baseline MRI and post-treatment CT. Predicted percentage of tumor necrosis was defined as 100%-(%baseline MRI enhancement-%CT oil deposition). Necrosis on post-TACE MRI was measured after volumetric segmentation to assess the accuracy of predicting tumor necrosis. The relationship between predicted necrosis percent and post-cTACE measured necrosis percent on MRI was compared using Pearson correlation analysis. Inter-reader agreement was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) after using the same method. RESULTS: Patients in this cohort had a mean age of 64 ± 14 years. Mean percentage of the viable tumor on pre-cTACE venous phase MRI was 58.5% ± 23.9%. Mean oil deposition was 19.8% ± 14.6%. Mean percentage of calculated necrosis one month after cTACE was 59.2% ± 22.7% on venous phase MRI, which had a significant correlation with predicted necrotic percentage of 61.3% ± 19.3% (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). ICC for enhancement percentage on pre-cTACE and post-cTACE venous phase MRIs were 0.93 (95% CI 0.83, 0.97) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.66, 0.94), respectively. ICC for oil deposition was 0.92 (95% CI 0.81, 0.96). CONCLUSION: Measuring oil deposition of the whole tumor on CT one day after cTACE can assist to predict post-cTACE tumor necrosis.

Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography to evaluate anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure in postoperative colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT) to predict clinically significant anastomotic leakage (CSAL) in patients who received colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy from January 2014 to May 2018 and postoperative CECT were included. The performance of significant CECT features, identified using multivariable logistic regression, to predict CSAL was calculated. In subgroup analysis, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were compared between CECT and water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE) using DeLong's method. RESULTS: Of 325 patients (median age, 58 years; 213 men), CECT was routinely performed to evaluate cancer status in 307 (94.5%), and CSAL was observed in 28 (8.6%). After multivariable adjustment, anastomotic mural defect (odds ratio [OR] 5.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-15.51; p = 0.003), perianastomotic air (OR 7.28; 95% CI 1.82-29.17; p = 0.007) and ischemic colitis (OR 3.30; 95% CI 1.13-9.61; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with CSAL. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of significant CECT features were 60.7%, 88.2%, 85.9%, 32.7%, and 96.0%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of 144 patients, the AUROC using significant CECT features (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 50.0%/90.4%) was comparable to that using WSCE (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 12.5%/97.8%) to predict CSAL (0.704 vs. 0.552, p = 0.085). CONCLUSION: CECT performed after colorectal cancer surgery may be useful to assess anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure, especially to negatively predict CSAL. In the presence of anastomotic mural defect, perianastomotic air, or ischemic colitis, WSCE may be recommended to exclude CSAL.

[A Case of Double Colorectal Cancer Diagnosed by Preoperative CT Colonography].

A 66‒year‒old man was admitted to our hospital because of anemia and a positive fecal occult blood test in the medical examination. Colonoscopy revealed a type 2 advanced sigmoid colon cancer with circular stenosis. Computed tomography (CT)colonography was performed to examine the oral colon. The apple core signs were found both in the sigmoid and transverse colon. We diagnosed a double colon cancer and performed a laparoscopic left hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy. The tumor was histopathologically diagnosed as a multiple cancer including a transverse and a sigmoid colon cancer. Although evaluations of the intestine for colon cancer with stenosis are performed by enema examination or endoscopic examination after colon stent placement, both examinations are invasive. CT colonography is considered to be a minimally invasive and an effective preoperative examination for colorectal cancer with stenosis.

The Impact of Changes in Service Delivery in Patients With Colorectal Cancer During the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed significant changes in cancer service delivery resulting in increased anxiety and distress in both patients and clinicians. We aimed to investigate how these changes have been perceived by patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and identify determinants of increased anxiety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An anonymized 32-item survey in the specialized lower gastrointestinal cancer outpatient clinics at a tertiary cancer center in North West England between May 18 and July 1, 2020. Self-reported anxiety was based on the General Anxiety Disorder-7 screening tool. RESULTS: Of 143 participants who completed the survey (response rate, 67%), 115 (82%) were male, and the median age group was 61 to 70 years. A total of 112 (78%) participants had telephone consultation (83% met needs), and 57 (40%) had radiologic scan results discussed over the phone (96% met needs). In total, 23 (18%) participants were considered to have anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7 score ≥ 5), with 7 (5.5%) scoring for moderate or severe anxiety. Those concerned about getting COVID-19 infection, and worried COVID-19 would have effect on their mental health, and affect their experience of cancer care, were most likely to have anxiety (P < .05, multivariate analysis). The majority did not feel they needed support during this phase of the pandemic. Participants felt that friends and family had been very supportive, but less so the primary care services (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this survey suggest that some of the service changes implemented may have already improved the overall experience of cancer care among patients with colorectal cancer at our institute. Reassuringly, the incidence of participants with moderate to severe anxiety levels during the peak of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom was much lower than anticipated. Importantly, patients were much more concerned about their cancer treatment than COVID-19, emphasizing the need to continue to provide comprehensive cancer care even with a "second wave" of COVID-19.

Epidemiology of Diverticulitis and Prevalence of First-Ever Colorectal Cancer Postdiverticulitis in Adults in the United States: A Population-Based National Study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of acute diverticulitis is increasing, and previous studies showed a wide range of prevalence of colorectal cancer after diverticulitis. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support performing colonoscopy after diverticulitis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the incidence of first-ever diverticulitis and prevalence of first-ever colorectal cancer postdiverticulitis in the United States. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: We queried a national database that contains data from 26 major integrated healthcare systems in the United States. PATIENTS: We identified an aggregated patient cohort aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of first-ever diverticulitis from February 2015 to February 2020, followed by first-ever colorectal cancer diagnosis, at least 1 day after and within 1 year of diverticulitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of first-ever diverticulitis was calculated. The prevalence and OR of first-ever colorectal cancer after diverticulitis were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 31,778,290 individuals, we found the incidence of first-ever acute diverticulitis to be 2.9%. The prevalence of colorectal cancer within 1 year of first-ever acute diverticulitis was 0.57%, whereas the prevalence of colorectal cancer without a history of diverticulitis was 0.31% (OR = 1.8 (95% CI, 1.76-1.86)). The majority (92.3%) of the postdiverticulitis colorectal cancer were diagnosed within the first 6 months. The risk of colorectal cancer postdiverticulitis was higher in women (OR = 1.9), African Americans (OR = 2.0), and adults aged 18 to 65 years (OR = 2.3). LIMITATIONS: We are unable to validate the diagnostic code because patient information in our database is deidentified. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals are twice as likely to be diagnosed with colorectal cancer within 1 year of their first episode of acute diverticulitis compared with individuals without diverticulitis. We advocate for colonoscopy after the first occurrence of acute diverticulitis to screen for colorectal cancer, particularly for patients without a recent colonoscopy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B412.

ANTECEDENTES: La incidencia de diverticulitis aguda está aumentando y los estudios anteriores mostraron una amplia gama de prevalencia de cáncer colorrectal después de diverticulitis. Hay una falta de evidencia de alta calidad para apoyar la realización de una colonoscopia después de la diverticulitis. OBJETIVOS: Nuestro objetivo fue describir la incidencia de la primera diverticulitis y la prevalencia del cáncer colorrectal posterior a la primera diverticulitis en los Estados Unidos.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. AJUSTES: Consultamos una base de datos nacional que contiene datos de 26 sistemas de salud integrados importantes en los Estados Unidos. PACIENTES: Identificamos una cohorte agregada de pacientes mayores de 18 años con un diagnóstico de diverticulitis por primera vez entre febrero de 2015 y febrero de 2020, seguido de un diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal por primera vez, al menos 1 día después y dentro de 1 año de diverticulitis. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Se calculó la incidencia de la primer diverticulitis. Se analizaron la prevalencia y el odds ratio del primer CCR después de la diverticulitis. RESULTADOS: Entre 31,778,290 individuos, encontramos que la incidencia de la primera diverticulitis aguda fue del 2.9%. La prevalencia de cáncer colorrectal dentro de 1 año de la primera diverticulitis aguda fue del 0,57%, mientras que la prevalencia del cáncer colorrectal sin antecedentes de diverticulitis fue del 0,31% (OR 1,8; IC del 95%: 1,76-1,86). La mayoría (92,3%) de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal posterior a diverticulitis se diagnosticaron dentro de los primeros 6 meses. El riesgo de CCR después de diverticulitis fue mayor en mujeres (OR 1,9), afroamericanos (OR 2,0) y adultos de 18 a 65 años (OR 2,3). LIMITACIONES: No podemos validar el código de diagnóstico debido a que la información del paciente en nuestra base de datos no está identificada. CONCLUSIONES: Las personas tienen el doble de probabilidades de ser diagnosticadas con cáncer colorrectal dentro del primer año de su primer episodio de diverticulitis aguda en comparación con las personas sin diverticulitis. Abogamos por la colonoscopia después de la primera aparición de diverticulitis aguda para detectar cáncer colorrectal, particularmente en pacientes sin una colonoscopia reciente.

Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.2. ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. The timing depends on an interdisciplinary decision including endoscopic and radiological factors. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR suggests that, in centers with expertise in and availability of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), CCE preferably the same or the next day may be considered if colonoscopy is incomplete. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.3. When colonoscopy is contraindicated or not possible, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with alarm symptoms. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. Because of lack of direct evidence, ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend CCE in this situation. Very low quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable alternative to colonoscopy for patients with non-alarm symptoms. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. In centers with availability, ESGE/ESGAR suggests that CCE may be considered in patients with non-alarm symptoms. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.4. Where there is no organized fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based population colorectal screening program, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an option for colorectal cancer screening, providing the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits, and risks, and depending on local service- and patient-related factors. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR do not suggest CCE as a first-line screening test for colorectal cancer. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.5. ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC in the case of a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or FIT with incomplete or unfeasible colonoscopy, within organized population screening programs. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR also suggest the use of CCE in this setting based on availability. Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence.6. ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC with intravenous contrast medium injection for surveillance after curative-intent resection of colorectal cancer only in patients in whom colonoscopy is contraindicated or unfeasible. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in this setting. Very low quality evidence.7. ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC in patients with high risk polyps undergoing surveillance after polypectomy only when colonoscopy is unfeasible. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in post-polypectomy surveillance. Very low quality evidence.8. ESGE/ESGAR recommend against CTC in patients with acute colonic inflammation and in those who have recently undergone colorectal surgery, pending a multidisciplinary evaluation. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.9. ESGE/ESGAR recommend referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp ≥6 mm detected at CTC or CCE. Follow-up CTC may be clinically considered for 6-9-mm CTC-detected lesions if patients do not undergo polypectomy because of patient choice, comorbidity, and/or low risk profile for advanced neoplasia. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. Source and scope This is an update of the 2014-15 Guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR). It addresses the clinical indications for the use of imaging alternatives to standard colonoscopy. A targeted literature search was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) or colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.

Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

1: ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 2: ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. The timing depends on an interdisciplinary decision including endoscopic and radiological factors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR suggests that, in centers with expertise in and availability of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), CCE preferably the same or the next day may be considered if colonoscopy is incomplete.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: When colonoscopy is contraindicated or not possible, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with alarm symptoms.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.Because of lack of direct evidence, ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend CCE in this situation.Very low quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable alternative to colonoscopy for patients with non-alarm symptoms.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.In centers with availability, ESGE/ESGAR suggests that CCE may be considered in patients with non-alarm symptoms.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 4: Where there is no organized fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based population colorectal screening program, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an option for colorectal cancer screening, providing the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits, and risks, and depending on local service- and patient-related factors.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR do not suggest CCE as a first-line screening test for colorectal cancer.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC in the case of a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or FIT with incomplete or unfeasible colonoscopy, within organized population screening programs.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR also suggest the use of CCE in this setting based on availability.Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 6: ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC with intravenous contrast medium injection for surveillance after curative-intent resection of colorectal cancer only in patients in whom colonoscopy is contraindicated or unfeasibleWeak recommendation, low quality evidence.There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in this setting.Very low quality evidence. 7: ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC in patients with high risk polyps undergoing surveillance after polypectomy only when colonoscopy is unfeasible.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in post-polypectomy surveillance.Very low quality evidence. 8: ESGE/ESGAR recommend against CTC in patients with acute colonic inflammation and in those who have recently undergone colorectal surgery, pending a multidisciplinary evaluation.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9: ESGE/ESGAR recommend referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm detected at CTC or CCE.Follow-up CTC may be clinically considered for 6 - 9-mm CTC-detected lesions if patients do not undergo polypectomy because of patient choice, comorbidity, and/or low risk profile for advanced neoplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.

Gadolinium-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Colorectal Tumor in MR Colonography.

The current study aims to investigate the possibility of using solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) colonography to diagnose colorectal cancer. Gd-FITC-SLNs were synthesized by loading gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) simultaneously. Twenty mice received azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium (AOM/DSS) to induce adenocarcinoma of the colon and were divided into 4 groups, and 5 in per group. MR colonography were performed at different time periods before and after enema or intravenous injection of Gd-FITC-SLNs or Gd-DTPA. The results demonstrated SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) significantly increased from 1.56- to 1.76-fold within the colorectal tumors after the enema of Gd-FITC-SLNs (p < 0.001). No differences in SNR were observed after the enema of Gd-DTPA (p > 0.05). Besides, SNR increased from 1.54- to 1.72-fold within the colorectal tumors after the intravenous injection of Gd-FITC-SLNs (p < 0.001) while SNR increased from 1.39to 1.57-fold within the colorectal tumors after the injection of Gd-DTPA (p < 0.001). In addition, SNR within colorectal tumors significantly increased ranging from 20th to 140th min, and lasted for about 120 min (p < 0.05) after the enema of Gd-FITC-SLNs and SNR within colorectal tumors also significantly increased ranging from 0th hour to 8th hour, lasted for about 8 hour (p < 0.05) after the injection of Gd-FITC-SLNs. However, after the injection of Gd-DTPA, SNR within colorectal tumors significantly increased only ranging from 0th min to 20th min after administration (p < 0.01). Furthermore, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed that all mice developed adenocarcinoma of the colon. In summary, it is feasible by using Gd-FITC-SLNs in MR colonography to diagnose colorectal cancer. Enema of Gd-FITC-SLNs can provide marked enhancement of colorectal tumors quickly, and safer while intravenous injection of Gd-FITC-SLNs can provide a long-lasting enhancement of colorectal tumors in MR colonography. These findings present a potential clinical application of Gd-FITC-SLNs on MR colonography.

Treating Immunologically Cold Tumors by Precise Cancer Photoimmunotherapy with an Extendable Nanoplatform.

Although immunotherapy has merged as an ideal cancer therapeutic strategy for preventing tumor growth and recurrence, effective approaches to treat immunologically cold tumors are still lacking. Herein, we reported a practical and extendable nanoplatform (HA/ZIF-8@ICG@IMQ) that facilely integrated various therapeutics and functions for boosting host antitumor immunity to treat immunologically cold tumors. The tumor-targeted and microenvironment-responsive HA/ZIF-8@ICG@IMQ facilitated the tumor-specific accumulation and release of photothermal agents and immune adjuvants. With near-infrared irradiation, the designed nanoparticles effectively enhanced the infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and helper T cells and effectively blocked the growth of primary and distant tumors. Moreover, the smart therapeutic could effectively prevent tumor rechallenge and recurrence with a long-term host immunological memory response. This method shows an effective immunologically cold tumor treatment using extendable nanotherapeutics and may have reference significance for clinical cancer therapy.

Molecular Imaging and Therapy of Colorectal and Anal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the cancer with the third highest incidence both in males and females in the USA and is also frequently occurring in other industrialized nations. Anal cancer on the other hand is much rarer, but has a rising incidence, especially in high income nations and with a connection to HIV infections, homosexual men and a younger age of the first sexual encounter. Both have high mortality rates in common and are complex to handle in terms of prevention, staging, treatment and diagnostic of recurrence. This article aims to give an overview about the established diagnostic methods of nuclear medicine, especially sole PET and (contrast enhanced) hybrid imaging with 18F-FDG as tracer for primary staging, restaging, therapy monitoring and radiotherapy planning in current guidelines, with a special focus on the American guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for colorectal and anal cancer. There will also be an outlook on potential future adjustments in those leading to a more significant representation of nuclear medicine by giving a synopsis of the available studies and data published in international medical press. New tracers that are still in research stage, progress in the imaging techniques, for example a further establishment of PET/MR hybrid imaging, the use of artificial intelligence and parametric imaging, as well as possible future theranostic applications like c-MET binding peptides will also be shortly discussed.

Magnetic-Photoacoustic Dual-Mode Probe for the Visualization of H2S in Colorectal Cancer.

Techniques for the qualitative and quantitative detection of H2S in vivo have attracted considerable attention due to the key role of H2S in various physiological and pathological processes. However, in vivo detection strategies for H2S are mainly based on fluorescence imaging, which is limited by its poor tissue penetration. Moreover, the limitations of single-mode probes are amplified in complex physiological environments. Herein, a core-shell Fe3O4@Cu2O nanoparticle was constructed as a magnetic-photoacoustic dual-mode probe for H2S detection in vitro and in vivo based on the in situ response of Cu2O to endogenous H2S in colon tumors. This probe is expected to greatly improve the accuracy of H2S detection in vivo because it employs two detection methods with complementary advantages. The new probe was experimentally applied to the in vivo and in vitro visualization of H2S in mice with colorectal cancer, validating the in situ reaction-activated dual-detection method. This work establishes a simple and efficient dual-mode imaging method based on a novel trigger mechanism. The findings provide a new strategy for colon cancer detection based on the in situ reactions at tumor sites.

Performance of radiographic imaging after incomplete colonoscopy for nonmalignant causes in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: CT colonography (CTC) or barium enema are commonly ordered to complete colorectal imaging after an incomplete colonoscopy. We evaluated the sensitivity of radiographic studies performed for this purpose in clinical practice outside clinical trials. METHODS: Adult patients referred to an expert endoscopist for incomplete colonoscopy because of a redundant colon or a difficult sigmoid and who underwent previous radiographic imaging between July 2001 and July 2019 were identified. None of the patients had a malignant obstruction as the cause of incomplete colonoscopy. Data on polyp size, location, and pathology were obtained from colonoscopy and radiology reports. Polyps identified on imaging and colonoscopy were matched based on polyp size and location. RESULTS: Among 769 patients referred for incomplete colonoscopy, we identified 65 with a radiographic examination performed within 36 months of colonoscopy at our center. Per-patient sensitivity for CTC was suboptimal (70%) and was very low for barium enema (26.7%). Per-polyp sensitivity for both CTC and barium enema was poor (23.8% and 7.6%). Quality of the examination did not seem to affect procedure sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic imaging after incomplete colonoscopy for reasons other than malignant obstruction had poor sensitivity for polyps. Patients with incomplete colonoscopies should be considered for repeat colonoscopy by an expert.

Carcinoembryonic antigen-specific, fluorescent image-guided cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

This multicentre pilot study investigated the role of peroperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific fluorescence imaging during cytoreductive surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy surgery in peritoneal metastasized colorectal cancer. A correct change in peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) owing to fluorescence imaging was seen in four of the 14 included patients. The use of SGM-101 in patients with peritoneally metastasized colorectal carcinoma is feasible, and allows intraoperative detection of tumour deposits and alteration of the PCI. Augmented reality guidance.