Arterial Spin Labeled Perfusion MRI for the Evaluation of Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background Tumor perfusion may inform therapeutic response and resistance in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with antiangiogenic therapy. Purpose To determine if arterial spin labeled (ASL) MRI perfusion changes are associated with tumor response and disease progression in metastatic RCC treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00749320), metastatic RCC perfusion was measured with ASL MRI before and during sunitinib or pazopanib therapy between October 2008 and March 2014. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Perfusion was compared between responders and nonresponders at baseline, at week 2, after cycle 2 (12 weeks), after cycle 4 (24 weeks), and at disease progression and compared with the ORR by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and with PFS by using the log-rank test. Results Seventeen participants received sunitinib (mean age, 59 years ± 7.0 [standard deviation]; 11 men); 11 participants received pazopanib (mean age, 63 years ± 6.6; eight men). Responders had higher baseline tumor perfusion than nonresponders (mean, 404 mL/100 g/min ± 213 vs 199 mL/100 g/min ± 136; P = .02). Perfusion decreased from baseline to week 2 (-53 mL/100 g/min ± 31; P < .001), after cycle 2 (-65 mL/100 g/min ± 25; P < .001), and after cycle 4 (-79 mL/100 g/min ± 15; P = .008). Interval reduction in perfusion at those three time points was not associated with ORR (P = .63, .29, and .27, respectively) or PFS (P = .28, .27, and .32). Perfusion increased from cycle 4 to disease progression (51% ± 11; P < .001). Conclusion Arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI may assist in identifying responders to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and may help detect early evidence of disease progression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Goh and De Vita in this issue.

Strobilanthes crispus bioactive subfraction inhibits tumor progression and improves hematological and morphological parameters in mouse mammary carcinoma model.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Locally known as 'pecah batu', 'bayam karang', 'keci beling' or 'batu jin', the Malaysian medicinal herb, Strobilanthes crispus (S. crispus), is traditionally used by the local communities as alternative or adjuvant remedy for cancer and other ailments and to boost the immune system. S. crispus has demonstrated multiple anticancer therapeutic potential in vitro and in vivo. A pharmacologically active fraction of S. crispus has been identified and termed as F3. Major constituents profiled in F3 include lutein and ß-sitosterol. AIM OF THE STUDY: In this study, the effects of F3, lutein and ß-sitosterol on tumor development and metastasis were investigated in 4T1-induced mouse mammary carcinoma model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor-bearing mice were fed with F3 (100 mg/kg/day), lutein (50 mg/kg/day) and ß-sitosterol (50 mg/kg/day) for 30 days (n = 5 each group). Tumor physical growth parameters, animal body weight and development of secondary tumors were investigated. The safety profile of F3 was assessed using hematological and histomorphological changes on the major organs in normal control mice (NM). RESULTS: Our findings revealed significant reduction of physical tumor growth parameters in all tumor-bearing mice treated with F3 (TM-F3), lutein (TM-L) or ß-sitosterol (TM-ß) as compared with the untreated group (TM). Statistically significant reduction in body weight was observed in TM compared to the NM or treated (TM-F3, TM-L and TM-ß) groups. Histomorphological examination of tissue sections from the F3-treated group showed normal features of the vital organs (i.e., liver, kidneys, lungs and spleen) which were similar to those of NM. Administration of F3 to NM mice (NM-F3) did not cause significant changes in full blood count values. CONCLUSION: F3 significantly reduced the total tumor burden and prevented secondary tumor development in metastatic breast cancer without significant toxicities in 4T1-induced mouse mammary carcinoma model. The current study provides further support for therapeutic development of F3 with further pharmacokinetics studies.

Patterns of Lymph Node Recurrence in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Possible Implications for Primary Surgical Treatment.

BACKGROUND: In the surgical treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), lymphadenectomy may improve oncologic outcome. However, patterns of metastatic lymphatic spread in ACC are unknown. METHODS: Clinical data of patients included in the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENSAT) registry were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: nonmetastatic ACC, complete resection of the primary tumor, a disease-free time of > 3 months, and lymph node metastases as the first disease relapse. The retroperitoneal lymphatic drainage area was evaluated by using follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Of 971 patients from the ENSAT registry, 56 patients were included. In left-sided ACC (n = 36), lymphatic recurrence was detected in the left renal hilum (50%), in the perirenal fat tissue cranial to the renal hilum (ventral, 47%; dorsal, 55%), para-aortic (47%), interaorto-caval (22%), and/or in the perirenal fat tissue caudal to the renal hilum (ventral, 20%; dorsal, 17%). In right-sided ACC (n = 20), lymph node metastases were detected in the perirenal fat tissue cranial to the renal hilum (dorsal, 55%; ventral, 45%), interaorto-caval (35%), in the area of the right renal artery (10%), and/or paracaval (15%). Patients with right-sided ACC showed left-paraaortic lymph node recurrences in 10% of cases. CONCLUSION: Metastatic lymphatic spread appears to be more extensive than previously thought. The distribution pattern of lymph node metastases described in our study could be used as a guide for a more extended lymph node dissection.

CXCR1 expression predicts benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: CXCR1 signaling promotes tumor progression in various cancers, and clinical trial has proved efficacy of CXCR1 inhibitor in metastatic breast cancer. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic value of CXCR1 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib were retrospectively enrolled (n = 111). CXCR1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays of primary tumor, and its association with prognosis and therapeutic response were evaluated. To explore possible mechanism related to CXCR1 expression, gene set enrichment analysis was performed based on The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. RESULTS: High CXCR1 expression was associated with poorer overall survival (P = 0.015) and was an independent prognostic factor for patients with mRCC treated by TKIs (Hazard Ratio = 1.683, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.109-2.553, P = 0.014). CXCR1 expression was also associated with worse therapeutic response of TKIs (P = 0.017). Thirteen pathways, including hypoxia and angiogenesis, were identified to be enriched in CXCR1 positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: High CXCR1 expression indicates reduced benefit from TKIs therapy in patients with mRCC. The mechanism may be attributed to the enriched pathways of hypoxia and angiogenesis in CXCR1 positive patients. CXCR1 may be a potential therapeutic target for mRCC, but further studies are required.

68Ga-PSMA Avid Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Lung With Complementary Low 18F-FDG Uptake.

Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan on a 70-year-old man with recently diagnosed prostate cancer revealed a spiculating nodule in the apex of the left lung with intense Ga-PSMA uptake. The nodule had no pathological F-FDG uptake and turned out to be a primary adenocarcinoma of the lung. Cases with complementary pattern of uptake in F-FDG and Ga-PSMA in metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma and in well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma have previously been reported; however, this case illustrates that this unusual pattern can also be present in primary lung cancer.

Primary Tumor Characteristics Are Important Prognostic Factors for Sorafenib-Treated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated 177 patients, including 116 who received sorafenib as first-line therapy, using the Cox regression model. During a median follow-up period of 19.2 months, the PFS and OS were 6.4 and 32.6 months among all patients and 7.4 months and undetermined for first-line sorafenib-treated patients, respectively. Clinical T3-4 stage (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56) and a primary tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.34) were significant prognostic factors for PFS among all patients, as were tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.12), collecting system invasion (HR 5.67), and tumor necrosis (HR 4.11) for OS (p < 0.05). In first-line sorafenib-treated patients, ≥4 metastatic lesions (HR 28.57), clinical T3-4 stage (HR 4.34), collecting system invasion (univariate analysis HR 2.11; multivariate analysis HR 0.07), lymphovascular invasion (HR 13.35), and tumor necrosis (HR 6.69) were significant prognosticators of PFS, as were bone metastasis (HR 5.49) and clinical T3-4 stages (HR 4.1) for OS (p < 0.05). Our study thus identified a number of primary tumor-related characteristics as important prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated mRCC patients.

Eficacia y seguridad de sunitinib para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con cáncer renal de células no claras (cromófobo) con enfermedad metastásica irresecable / Efficacy and safety of sunitinib for the treatment of adult patients with non-clear cell (chromophobe) kidney cancer with unresectable metastatic disease

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de tecnologia de la eficacia y seguridad de sunitinib para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con cáncer renal de células no claras (cromófobo) con enfermedad metastásica irresecable. Aspectos Generales: El carcinoma de células renales (CCR) usualmente se origina en el revestimiento de los túbulos del riñon y contiene muchos vasos sanguíneos. El CCR es el tipo más común de cáncer de riño, representando el 90% de todos los cánceres de riños y aproximadamente el 3% de todos los cánceres en adultos en Europa. Tecnología Sanitaria de Interés: Sunitinib es un fármaco antineoplásico de administración oral, que inhibe múltiples receptores de tirosina quinasa (RTKs), algunos de los cuales están implicados en el crecimiento tumoral, la neoangiogénesis y la progresión a metástasis. Estos incluyen los receptores del factor de crecimiento derivado de plaquetas (PDGFR alfa y PDGFR beta), factor de crecimiento del endotelio vascular (VEGFR1, (VEGFR2 y (VEGFR3), factor de células madre (KIT), tirosin-kinasa 3tipo Fms (FLT3), factor estimulador de colonias (CSF-1R) y factor neurotrófico derivado de la línea celular glial (RET). La inhibición simultánea de estos receptores genera una fuerte disminución de la neovascularización tumoral, conllevando así a la reducción del tumor, y a su vez explica muchos de sus efectos adversos tales como el síndrome mano pie, estomatitis, y otra variedad de efectos dermatológicos. METODOLOGÍA: Estrategia de Búsqueda: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la evidencia científica, especialmente la proveniente de ensayos clínicos, con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de sunitinib en pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de carcinoma de células renales metastásico cromófobo en las bases de datos MEDLINE, TRIPDATABASE y LILACS. Una vez identificados los artículos que respondían a la preginta PICO, se pasó a revisar la bibliografia incluida en dichos artículos seleccionados, con la finalidad de identificar evidencia adicional. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de bases de datos pertenecientes a grupos que realizan revisiones sistemáticas, evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica tales como National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), The National Guideline for Clearinghouse (NGC), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), The National Institute for Health and Cares Excellence (NICE), The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), The Agency for Healthcarre Research and Quality (AHQR) y The Cochrane Collaboration. Se hizo una búsqueda adicional en clinicaltrials.gov y www.ensayosclinicos-repec.ins.gob.pe, para poder identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o que no hayan sido publicados. RESULTADOS: Sinopsis de la Evidencia: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de sunitinib, en comparación a la mejor terpia de soporte, como tratamiento del cáncer renal de céluas no claras de tipo cromófobo con enfermedad metastásica irresecable. Debido a que no se encontraron ensayos clínicos que respondieran a la preginta PICO, se incluyeron diseños de estudios del tipo ensayos clínicos de un solo brazo, ensayos clínicos comparativos versus otras terapias dirigidas y estudios retrospectivos. CONCLUSIONES: A la fecha, no existe evidencia suficiente sobre la eficacia de sunitinib, con respecto a la mejor terpia de soporte, en pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de cáncer renal cromófobo, en términos de mayor sobrevida global, calidad de vida, sobrevida libre de progresión y tasa respuesta objetiva. El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) no aprueba el uso de sunitinib para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con cáncer de células no claras (cromófobo) con enfermedad metastásica irresecable.

A large-scale prospective registration study of the safety and efficacy of sorafenib tosylate in unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan: results of over 3200 consecutive cases in post-marketing all-patient surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Real-life safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma in a nationwide patient population were evaluated by post-marketing all-patient surveillance. METHODS: All patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan who started sorafenib therapy from February 2008 to September 2009 were registered and followed for up to 12 months. Baseline characteristics, treatment status, tumor response, survival and safety data were recorded by the prescribing physicians. RESULTS: Safety and efficacy were evaluated in 3255 and 3171 patients, respectively. The initial daily dose was 800 mg in 78.2% of patients. Median duration of treatment was 6.7 months and the mean relative dose intensity was 68.4%. Overall, 2227 patients (68.4%) discontinued the treatment by 12 months, half of which (52.0% of discontinued patients) were due to adverse events. The most common adverse drug reactions were hand-foot skin reaction (59%), hypertension (36%), rash (25%) and increase in lipase/amylase (23%). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence intervals: 6.7-8.1), and the overall survival rate at 1 year was 75.4% (73.5-77.1). Prognostic factors for overall survival were mostly consistent with those in previous clinical trials in the univariate analysis and largely similar to those for progression-free survival and duration of treatment in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma under the labeled dose was feasible in daily medical practice, for its acceptable toxicity profile and favorable clinical benefit that were consistent with those in clinical trials.

Overall survival after immunotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and surgery in treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer: outcome of 143 consecutive patients from a single centre.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) after treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) following the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred and forty-three consecutive mRCC patients were given immunotherapy (n = 59), TKIs (n = 49) or sequential therapy (IMM → TKI group; n = 35). The TKI group included patients with higher age (p < 0.001), worse performance status (p = 0.005) and higher risk profile (p < 0.001) than the other two treatment groups. Number of metastases and sites and tumour histology did not differ between groups. RESULTS: First line immunotherapy gave a median OS of 16.3 months and first line TKIs 10.9 months (p = 0.003). Survival longer than 5 years was limited to immunotherapy. Sarcomatoid component, metastatic sites, papillary histology, stage, performance status and white cell blood count were related to poor OS. Using multivariate analyses to adjust for risk predictors the difference in OS disappeared. Median OS before and after introduction of TKIs was 16 months and 14 months, respectively (p = 0.189). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk groups were related to OS (p < 0.001). Heng's prognostic criteria appeared slightly more predictive than MSKCC (p = 0.12). Metastasectomy (n = 42) may improve OS [surgery: median OS 18.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.3-48.5; no surgery: median OS 15 months, 95% CI 10.4-16.5; p = 0.07]. CONCLUSIONS: MSKCC and Heng's prognostic algorithms were valid for prognostication and can be used for individual planning of treatment and follow-up. Surgical removal of metastases may improve OS.

Successful use of sorafenib after bortezomib failure in metastatic follicular thyroid cancer - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most commonly diagnosed endocrine malignancy in developed countries. Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), which includes papillary thyroid carcinoma and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC), composes more than 90% of all TC cases. When DTC recurs or metastasizes to distant sites despite the use of local and radiotherapeutic treatment modalities, the currently effective treatment options are limited. CASE REPORT: A then 40-year-old female Caucasian patient was diagnosed with FTC and underwent surgery and postoperative radioactive iodine therapy. The patient developed metastatic disease, and palliative first-line treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib was initiated. After 3 months, the patient suffered progressive pulmonary metastatic disease. Treatment with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib was started, and after 3 months of therapy, tumor restaging demonstrated partial remission. The treatment is ongoing, and the current progression-free survival is 16 months. With the exception of mild diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome, the therapy was well tolerated, and no grade 3/4 adverse toxicities occurred. CONCLUSION: In our single case of metastatic FTC, sorafenib showed clinically meaningful antitumor activity accompanied by good tolerability. This case report supports the use of this drug as a potential treatment option for advanced/metastatic FTC.

Dietary selenium supplementation modifies breast tumor growth and metastasis.

The survival rate for breast cancer drops dramatically once the disease progresses to the metastatic stage. Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient credited with having high anticancer and chemopreventive properties. In our study, we investigated if dietary Se supplementation modified breast cancer development in vivo. Three diets supplemented with sodium selenite, methylseleninic acid (MSA) or selenomethionine (SeMet), as well as a Se-deficient and a Se-adequate diet were fed to mice before mammary gland inoculation of 4T1.2 cells. The primary tumor growth, the numbers of cancer cells present in lungs, hearts, livers, kidneys and femurs and several proinflammatory cytokines were measured. We found that inorganic selenite supplementation provided only short-term delay of tumor growth, whereas the two organic SeMet and MSA supplements provided more potent growth inhibition. These diets also affected cancer metastasis differently. Mice fed selenite developed the most extensive metastasis and had an increased incidence of kidney and bone metastasis. On the other hand, mice fed the SeMet diet showed the least amount of cancer growth at metastatic sites. The MSA diet also provided some protection against breast cancer metastasis although the effects were less significant than those of SeMet. The cytokine profiles indicated that serum levels of interlukin-2, interleukin-6, interferon γ and vascular endothelial growth factor were elevated in SeMet-supplemented mice. There was no significant difference in tumor growth and the patterns of metastasis between the Se-deficient and Se-adequate groups. Our data suggest that organic Se supplementation may reduce/delay breast cancer metastasis, while selenite may exacerbate it.

Does timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy impact patient survival with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era? A multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who underwent primary cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN), followed by adjuvant sunitinib therapy, vs those who underwent primary sunitinib therapy before planned CRN. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 35 mRCC patients from June 2005 to August 2009 (median follow-up, 28.5 months): 17 underwent primary CRN, followed by adjuvant sunitinib (group 1); 18 underwent primary sunitinib therapy, followed by planned CRN (group 2). Response to therapy was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Group 2 patients who had partial response (PR)/stable disease (SD) proceeded to CRN (group 2 +CRN). Group 2 patients who progressed were treated with salvage systemic therapy (group 2 no-CRN). Primary and secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patient demographic and tumor characteristics were similar. The groups had similar rates of DSS and OS on univariate analysis (P = .318 and P = .181). In group 2, 11 (61%) had PR/DS; 7 (39%) progressed. Mean times to disease-specific death in group 1, group 2 (+CRN), and group 2 (no-CRN) were 29.2, 4.6, and 28.7 months, respectively (P = .025). Kaplan-Meier analysis of DSS and OS demonstrated significant improvement in group 2 (+CRN) vs group 1 vs group 2 (no-CRN; P <.001), which remained significant on multivariate regression. CONCLUSION: Nonresponders to primary sunitinib therapy had a poor prognosis. Offering CRN, if safely feasible, combined with sunitinib, was associated with improved disease-specific outcome in mRCC. Responders to primary sunitinib who underwent CRN had better DSS and OS than patients who underwent primary CRN, followed by sunitinib. Further investigation is required to assess the role, timing, and sequencing of targeted therapy and CRN in treatment of mRCC.

Programmed death 1 pathway inhibition in metastatic renal cell cancer and prostate cancer.

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is a T cell co-inhibitory receptor with two ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. In cancer, this pathway plays a major role in immune resistance in the tumor environment. Blockade of this pathway can enhance antitumor immune responses. This review discusses the preclinical rationale for PD-1 pathway inhibition in advanced renal cell carcinoma and prostate cancer, in addition to the clinical activity and toxicity of the anti-PD-L1 antibody BMS-936559, as well as anti-PD-1 antibodies MK-3475 and BMS-936558.

Multiple osteolytic lesions of intraosseous adenoid cystic carcinoma in the mandible mimicking apical periodontitis.

AIM: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a relatively rare epithelial tumour of the salivary glands in the maxillofacial region. About 40-60% of the patients develop distant metastases, which have been documented most commonly in the lung but also in brain, bone, liver, thyroid, spleen and pancreatic gland. SUMMARY: A 55-year-old women with intraosseous ACC in the mandible mimicking apical periodontitis following curative resection and radiotherapy is presented. Three years later, multiple lung metastases were observed followed by chemotherapy. Five years after curative resection, the patient presented simultaneously with new expansive soft tissue in the pancreas and mammary gland as well as in the kidney found to be metastatic ACC. No case has been reported to date on the manifestation of distant metastases of intraosseous ACC in the breast and the kidney as described by these observations. Metastatic mammary gland ACC stained positive for epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) but was negative for HER-2/neu and Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression.

Neoadjuvant therapy of renal cell carcinoma: a novel treatment option in the era of targeted therapy?

The study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness, toxicity and optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with organ-confined or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted agents. A literature review was carried out using Medline/Pubmed articles, as well as congress reports from the last five American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Urological Association and European Association of Urology Annual Meetings. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy is feasible and shows toxicity similar to that seen in a palliative setting. Most studies recommend an application for 2-4 months. The current data situation is best for sunitinib. Surgery can apparently be carried out the day right after discontinuing the drug. However, even sunitinib leads to only a mean 10% decrease in primary tumor size, and one-quarter to one-fifth of all patients show local tumor progression during treatment. Few patients (approximately 12%) with a vena cava tumor thrombus achieve a significant decrease in its level under neoadjuvant therapy; here too, progression is observed in a significant number of cases. Even the new targeted agents show limited effectiveness in achieving relevant remissions of the primary tumor. Furthermore, tumor progression is seen in a significant percentage of patients during neoadjuvant therapy. Thus, even today in the era of targeted agents, a neoadjuvant approach should only be made in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma, which primarily seem to be absolutely inaccessible by (partial) nephrectomy.

Sunitinib followed by sorafenib or vice versa for metastatic renal cell carcinoma--data from the Czech registry.

BACKGROUND: Sequential therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), sunitinib and sorafenib, is a common treatment choice for patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) despite lack of randomised trials. The aim of this retrospective registry-based study was to analyse the outcomes of RCC patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib or sorafenib-sunitinib sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Czech database containing information on patients treated for mRCC using targeted agents was used as a source of data for retrospective analysis. There were 138 patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib sequence and 122 patients treated with sorafenib-sunitinib sequence. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.7 months for patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib sequence and 18.8 months for those receiving sorafenib followed by sunitinib (P = 0.47). Overall survival (OS) at 1 year was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 77% to 90%] for patients treated with sunitinib-sorafenib and 84% (95% CI 77% to 91%) for sorafenib-sunitinib patients (P = 0.99). Treatment toxic effects were predictable but a significant proportion of patients (up to 14%-25% for different lines of therapy and used TKI) switched between TKIs or discontinued TKI therapy because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to most of the previously published reports, we have not observed improved PFS or OS for mRCC patients treated with the sorafenib-sunitinib sequence as compared to the sunitinib-sorafenib sequence.

Oral cancer treatment and immune targets - a role for dendritic cells?

Treating a patient suffering from an advanced oral cavity carcinoma by peritumoural injections of mistletoe preparation resulted in a surprising partial response. At the same time an early metastasis, located at the kidney, however remained unaffected. The main difference in treatment being peritumoural versus systematic application supports the hypothesis of immune surveillance. The impact of mistletoe extract in direct contact with the tumour tissue might be explained as activation of macrophage polarization followed by induced cytotoxicity. No direct contact is resulting in no direct macrophage activation. At present there is no clinical trial outlined to test this hypothesis, but as a beginning we would like to encourage submission of case reports with similar clinical experience.

Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors for overall survival in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib.

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? A randomized prospective phase III clinical trial for systemic treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) patients demonstrated the superiority of sunitinib over interferon with an acceptable safety profile. However, a commonly asked question is whether patients with RCC in clinical trials are representative of those with this disease being seen in ordinary clinical practice. To our knowledge, this is the first report of sunitinib for the Japanese patients with metastatic RCC in ordinary clinical practice. The estimated median PFS and OS in this study were 9.3 and 32.2 months, respectively. The application of the MSKCC model distinctly separated OS curves (P<0.001), suggesting that MSKCC prognostic factors might be still valid to predict survival in metastatic RCC in the era of molecular targeted therapy. OBJECTIVES: • To report the treatment efficacy and safety profile of sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in ordinary clinical practice. • In addition, to investigate the prognostic clinicopathological factors in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • The present study consisted of native Japanese patients with metastatic RCC, comprising 29 pretreated and 34 systemic treatment-naïve patients. • Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively. RESULTS: • Estimated median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 9.3 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 5.0-13.7) and 32.2 months (95% CI, 24.4-40.0), respectively. • Among the patients pretreated before sunitinib, two patients were treated with initialized systemic therapy with sorafenib and the remaining 27 were initialized with interferon-α. • The OS from the initial systemic therapy of the patients in pretreated groups was 79.6 months (95% CI, 14.6-144.5). • The application of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model distinctly separated the OS curves (P < 0.001). • The most common grade 3 adverse events were fatigue (53%), thrombocytopaenia (48%), hand-foot syndrome (16%), anaemia (20%), hypertension (10%) and leucopaenia (9%), although these events were manageable and reversible. CONCLUSIONS: • Sunitinib has a favourable efficacy/safety profile for Japanese metastatic RCC patients in clinical practice. • The estimated median OS was >2 years with acceptable tolerability. • The median OS from the initial systemic therapy of the pretreated patients was >6 years. • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic factors still appear to be valid for predicting survival in metastatic RCC in the era of molecular targeted therapy.

Sequential therapies with sorafenib and sunitinib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma benefit from sequential therapies with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 89 patients were treated in nine German centres between 2002 and 2009. The TKI sequence started as first-, second- or third-line therapy after prior chemo- or immunotherapy. When progression was diagnosed, treatment was switched to the second TKI until further progression. RESULTS: Overall progression-free survival (PFS) of patients receiving sunitinib followed by sorafenib shows no statistically significant difference to patients receiving sorafenib followed by sunitinib (15.4 months vs. 12.1 months). The secondary use of sorafenib resulted in a median PFS of 3.8 months if the TKI sequence had been started as a first-line treatment and of 3.5 months if the TKI sequence had been started second-line treatment. The secondary use of sunitinib resulted in a median PFS of 3.4 and 4.0 months, respectively. OS was 28.8 months for all patients, without a statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study endorses the notion of a clinical benefit of the sequential use of sorafenib and sunitinib and supports observations from previous studies. In terms of the optimal succession of the two TKIs, the study does not allow a definite answer.

A retrospective study of the preoperative treatment of advanced Wilms tumor in children with chemotherapy versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone or combined with short-term systemic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with short-term systematic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced Wilms tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study on 66 patients with unilateral advanced Wilms tumor, age 5 months to 11 years (median, 2.9 years; 30 boys and 36 girls), treated at our institution between 1995 and 2007. Characteristics of the patient population were maximal tumor diameter > 10 cm, or involvement of periaortic lymph nodes, or inferior vena cava invasion, or distal metastasis, or tumor with anaplastic histology. Patients were divided into three groups. Twenty patients were treated with conventional preoperative chemotherapy (PC group) using vindesine, actinomycin D, and pirarubicin for 4 weeks; 21 patients were treated in the TACE group with preoperative renal arterial chemoembolization using Lipiodol-pirarubicin-vindesine emulsion; and 25 patients were treated with preoperative chemoembolization combined with short-term systematic chemotherapy (T+S) for 2 weeks. RESULTS: No drug-induced cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, or hepatic dysfunction was observed. Complete surgical removal of the tumor was achieved in 12 (65.0%), 17 (80.9%), and 22 (88.0%) patients in the PC, TACE, and T+S groups, respectively (T+S group vs PC group, P = .030). The 2-year relapse-free survival rates were 65.0%, 80.9%, and 100.0% in the PC, TACE, and T+S groups, respectively (T+S vs PC, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: From our experience, preoperative chemoembolization combined with short-term systematic chemotherapy is able to achieve higher rates of complete tumor resection and relapse-free survival in the treatment of advanced Wilms tumor.