Postoperative recurrent patterns of gallbladder cancer: possible implications for adjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an uncommon malignancy with high recurrent rate and poor prognosis. This study investigates the recurrent patterns of postoperative GBC, with the aim to guide the adjuvant treatments, including the radiotherapy. METHODS: Retrospectively analyzed the 109 GBC patients who underwent surgery in our institution from January 2013 to 2018. Clinical follow-up revealed 54 recurrent cases, of which 40 had detailed locations of recurrence. The sites of recurrence were recorded and divided into the tumor bed, corresponding lymphatic drainage area, intrahepatic recurrence, and the other distant metastasis. RESULTS: The median follow-up time is 34 months (IQR: 11-64). The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 48.8 months and 53.7 months, respectively. Through univariate analysis, risk factors for DFS and OS include tumor markers (CA199 and CEA), hepatic invasion, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, TNM staging and tumor differentiation. Through multivariate analysis, risk factors for DFS include hepatic invasion and TNM staging, and for OS is TNM staging only. Of the 40 cases with specific recurrent sites, 29 patients (29/40, 72.5%) had recurrence in the potential target volume of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT), which include tumor bed and corresponding lymphatic drainage area. The common recurrent lymph node groups included abdominal para-aortic lymph node (No.16, 15/29), hepatoduodenal ligament lymph node (No.12, 8/29), retro-pancreatic head lymph node (No.13, 7/29) and celiac axis lymph node (No.9, 4/29). Twenty cases with recurrences inside the potential PORT target volume were accompanied by distant metastasis. Another 11 cases had distant metastasis alone, so totally 31 cases developed distant metastasis (31/40, 77.5%), including 18 cases with hepatic metastasis. CONCLUSION: The recurrence and metastasis rates are high in GBC and adjuvant therapy is needed. Up to 75% of the recurrent cases occurred in the potential target volume of postoperative radiotherapy, suggesting that postoperative radiotherapy has the possible value of improving local-regional control. The potential target volume of radiotherapy should include the tumor bed, No.8, No.9, No.11, No.12, No.13, No.14, No. 16a2, No. 16b1 lymph node groups.

Massive cerebral air embolism following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: A case report.

RATIONALE: Cerebral air embolism from portal venous gas rarely occurs due to invasive procedures (e.g., endoscopic procedures, liver biopsy, or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage) that disrupt the gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary structures. Here, we report a rare case of fatal cerebral air embolism following a series of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tube insertions. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 50-year-old woman with a history of cholecystectomy, liver wedge resection, and hepaticojejunostomy for gallbladder cancer presented with altered mental status 1 week after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tube placement. DIAGNOSES: Extensive cerebral air embolism and acute cerebral infarction. INTERVENTIONS: Brain computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, medical therapy. OUTCOMES: Despite the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and medical treatment including vasopressors, the patient eventually died due to massive systemic air embolism. LESSONS: To date, there have been no reports of cerebral air embolism due to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage with pronounced radiologic images. We reviewed previously reported fatal cases associated with endoscopic hepatobiliary procedures and assessed the possible mechanisms and potential causes of air embolism.

Undertreatment of Gallbladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer has a high mortality rate and an increasing incidence. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend resection for all T1b and higher-stage cancers. This study aimed to evaluate re-resection rates and the associated survival impact for patients with gallbladder cancer. METHODS: Patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Re-resection was defined as definitive surgery within 180 days after the first operation. Propensity scores were created for the odds of a patient having a re-resection. Patients were matched 1:2. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. RESULTS: The study identified 6175 patients, and 466 of these patients (7.6%) underwent re-resection. Re-resection was associated with younger median age (65 vs 72 years; p < 0.0001), private insurance (41.6% vs 27.1%; p < 0.0001), academic centers (50.4% vs 29.7%; p < 0.0001), and treatment location in the Northeast (22.8% vs 20.4%; p = 0.0011). Compared with no re-resection, re-resection was associated with pT stage (pT2: 47.6% vs 42.8%; p = 0.0139) and pN stage (pN1-2: 28.1% vs 20.7%; p < 0.0001), negative margins on final pathology (90.1% vs 72.6%; p < 0.0001), and receipt of chemotherapy (53.7% vs 35.8%; p < 0.0001). The patients who underwent re-resection demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the patients who did not undergo re-resection (median OS, 44.0 vs 23.0 months; p < 0.0001). After propensity score-matching, re-resection remained associated with superior survival (median OS, 44.0 vs 31.0 months; p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Re-resection for gallbladder cancer is associated with improved survival but remains underused, particularly for early-stage disease.

Effect of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Combined with Low-dose 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Advanced Biliary Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the effectiveness of chemotherapy with gemcitabine combined with low-dose 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (GFP) for advanced biliary carcinoma after hepatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients had biliary carcinoma with lymph node metastasis, intrahepatic metastasis or positive surgical margins, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC, n=25), hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC, n=14), and gallbladder cancer (GBC, n=23). Twenty-eight patients (IHC; n=9, HC; n=8, GBC; n=11) received adjuvant GFP chemotherapy. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in clinicopathological factors in patients treated with or without adjuvant GFP chemotherapy. Overall, survival in the adjuvant GFP group was significantly better than that in the non-adjuvant GFP group (3-year survival: 61.9% vs. 8.8%, p<0.001), as was relapse-free survival. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant GFP chemotherapy after hepatectomy may be a promising option for improving surgical outcomes in patients with advanced biliary carcinoma.

[A long survival after the treatment of a squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder]. / Une longue survie après traitement d'un carcinome épidermoïde de la vésicule biliaire.

We report the case of a long survival after the treatment of a squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder. The patient is a 58-year-old man, who was treated by cholecystectomy, followed by postoperative radiotherapy of the tumour bed at a dose of 45Gy, combined with 5-fluoro-uracil chemotherapy. After 18 years, the patient is alive in complete remission. The end point of this work was to study the clinical and therapeutic characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder and its prognosis through this case and a review of literature.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for gallbladder cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to analyze the outcome of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with gallbladder cancer who underwent surgical resection and to identify the prognostic factors for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1989 and November 2006, 47 patients with gallbladder cancer underwent surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. There were 21 males and 26 females, and median age was 60 years (range 44-75 years). Postoperative radiotherapy was delivered to the tumor bed and regional lymph nodes up to 40-50 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction; 41 patients also received intravenous 5-fluorouracil as a radiosensitizer. Median follow-up duration was 48 months for survivors. RESULTS: There were 2 isolated locoregional recurrences, 14 isolated distant metastases, and 7 combined locoregional and distant relapses. The 5-year overall survival rate was 43.7%. According to the extent of resection, the 5-year overall survival rates were 52.8%, 20.0%, and 0% in R0-, R1-, and R2-resected patients, respectively (p = 0.0038). On multivariate analysis incorporating extent of resection, T stage, N stage, performance of lymph node dissection, and histologic differentiation, extent of resection was the only prognostic factor associated with overall survival (p = 0.0075). Among the 37 patients with R0 resection, there was no difference of 5-year overall survival rates in patients with N0, N1, and Nx diseases (46.2%, 60.0%, and 44.4%, respectively, p = 0.6246). As for significant treatment-related morbidity, there was only 1 patient with grade 4 gastric ulcer. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after R0 resection can achieve a good long-term survival rate in gallbladder cancer patients, even in those with lymph node metastases, and may play a role for patients who underwent R0 resection of primary tumor without lymph node dissection.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable biliary tract cancer: current status and future direction.

The prognosis of patients with biliary tract cancer remains unsatisfactory even with surgery owing to the high recurrence rate. Therefore, an effective adjuvant chemotherapy is required to prolong survival. A few randomized controlled trials in patients with limited biliary tract cancer have been reported, but the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy could not be clarified. To date, effective adjuvant chemotherapy with evidence has not been established, and the standard therapy for patients with resectable biliary tract cancer has only been surgical treatment. Recently, a number of newer toxic agents have been shown to induce response in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Moreover, the morbi-mortality rate of operation for this cancer has been decreasing owing to advances in operative techniques and perioperative management. Given this background, a number of adjuvant chemotherapy trials have been started using gemcitabine, capecitabine, S-1, and combination chemotherapy with platinum. The results of these trials will be reported in the near future. Overall, the important aspects of adjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer are to establish well-organized and active clinical trial study groups, to conduct well-designed multicenter randomized controlled trials, and to continue such trials without interruption in the future.

SWOG 0514: a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Gallbladder and cholangiocarcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of malignant diseases that commonly present at an advanced stage and have limited therapeutic options. Based on the role of the Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk pathway and the VEGF axis in biliary carcinomas, we conducted a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary cancers. METHODS: Eligible patients had no prior therapy for metastatic or unresectable disease. Sorafenib was administered at 400 mg po twice daily continuously. RESULTS: The study was terminated after the first stage of accrual due to failure to meet the primary objective. A confirmed response rate of 0% (0%-11%) was observed. Thirty-nine percent of patients demonstrated stable disease (including 2 with unconfirmed PR). PFS was 3 months (95% CI: 2-4 months) and OS 9 months (95% CI: 4-12 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction (13%), bilirubin elevation (13%), venous thromboembolism (10%), AST/ALT elevation (10%) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (10%). CONCLUSION: While treatment with sorafenib did not result in objective responses, patients with biliary cancers receiving this drug had some therapeutic benefit. Additional studies with sorafenib in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted agents may be warranted.

[Chemotherapy in gallbladder carcinoma]. / Chimiothérapie dans le cancer de la vésicule biliaire.

Gallbladder cancer is an aggressive tumor. Its incidence varies according to geography. Surgery is the standard treatment for localized stage but there is no standard treatment in metastatic or locally advanced disease. Because of the rarity of bile tract cancer (BTC) and gallblader carcinoma (GBC), most studies have grouped all BTC and GBC together, and there are very few GBC-specific studies. In addition, there is a paucity of randomized controlled studies in this disease with small numbers of patients and inclusion bias. One randomized trial ABC-02 was well conducted and showed a survival benefit in favor of gemcitabine (GEM)+cisplatin (CDDP), which can be regarded as the standard in locally advanced BTC. Adjuvant therapy after surgical resection is not validated. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis of GBC has opened the way for the use of targeted therapies. This new treatment would improve survival and quality of life of our patients.

National trends in the management and survival of surgically managed gallbladder adenocarcinoma over 15 years: a population-based analysis.

INTRODUCTION: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend hepatic resection and lymphadenectomy (LND) for gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA). We sought to evaluate compliance with these recommendations and to assess trends in the management and survival of patients with GBA. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data, we identified 2,955 patients with GBA who underwent cancer-directed surgery from 1991 to 2005. We assessed clinicopathologic data, trends in surgical management, and survival. RESULTS: From 1991 to 2005, preoperative evaluation included CT (62%), MRI (6%), and PET (2%). Only 383 (13%) patients underwent radical resection/hepatectomy with a temporal increase over the study period (1991-1995, 12%; 1996-1999, 10%; 2000-2002, 12.0%; 2003-2005, 16%; P < 0.001). For patients undergoing radical resection/hepatectomy, LND ≥ 3 nodes was performed in 96 (3%) patients. Among patients who had LND, 47% had nodal metastasis. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 56%, 30%, and 21%. On multivariate analysis, radical resection/hepatectomy (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71) and LND ≥ 3 nodes (HR = 0.56) were independently associated with increased survival. There was no significant improvement in survival over time (P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with NCCN guidelines for GBA remains poor. Survival of patients with surgically managed GBA has not improved over time.

Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radical cholecystectomy, including hepatic resection and portal lymph node (LN) dissection, for patients with early stage gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine the survival benefit conferred by adequate LN evaluation. METHODS: We used the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) neoplasm registry to identify patients who had an operation for GB cancer between 1988 and 2004. Patients were classified by stage of disease, operative procedure performed (cholecystectomy alone or radical resection), number of LNs evaluated (0, 1, >1), and receipt of radiation (RT). We included patients with T1B, T2, and T3 neoplasms who were LN positive or negative. Patients with T4 neoplasms and those with metastatic disease were excluded. Multivariate analysis included adjustment for age, race, sex, neoplasm grade, stage, operation performed, receipt of RT, and neoplasm registry. RESULTS: We identified 4,614 patients who underwent operative treatment for stage 1-2B GB (including T1B-T3 and LN positive or negative) cancer between 1988 and 2004. Of 4,614 patients, 9.6% (442) had radical resection, whereas 90.4% (4,172) had cholecystectomy alone. Among patients undergoing radical resection, 56% had LNs evaluated as compared with 28% of patients after cholecystectomy. For patients with T1B and T2 neoplasms who underwent radical resection, pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared with those who had no LN evaluated (123 months vs 22 months; P < .0001). Radical resection with no LN evaluation provided similar OS compared with cholecystectomy alone (22 months vs 23 months; P = NS). For patients with T3 neoplasms, radical resection, including pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN, was also associated with improved OS compared with radical resection with no LN evaluation (12 months vs 7 months; P = .0014). Again, individuals who had radical resection without LN evaluation had similar OS compared with those who had cholecystectomy alone (7 months vs 6 months; P = NS). Individuals who had radical resection with LN evaluation were more likely to receive RT than those who had radical resection without LN evaluation (33.1% vs 19.1%; P = .002). In multivariate analysis (including adjustment for RT), however, LN evaluation was still associated with a decrease in mortality compared with no LN evaluated (HR = 0.611; 95% CI = 0.484, 0.770). The pathologic evaluation of additional LN (>1) did not provide any additional benefit compared with the evaluation of a single node (HR = 0.795; 95% CI = 0.571, 1.107). Radical resection alone (without LN evaluation) did not provide any benefit over cholecystectomy alone (HR = 1.098; 95% CI = 0.971, 1.241). CONCLUSION: LN evaluation is a critical component of radical resection for GB cancer. In the absence of LN evaluation, radical resection provides no benefit over cholecystectomy alone.

Adjuvant therapy for gallbladder carcinoma: the Mayo Clinic Experience.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on gallbladder carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the records from consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection of gallbladder carcinoma between January 1, 1985, and December 31, 2004. Patients had either Stage I (T1-T2N0M0) or Stage II (T3N0M0 or T1-T3N1M0) disease. Patients undergoing adjuvant therapy received 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy (median dosage, 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Adverse prognostic factors and the effect of adjuvant treatment on overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included in the analysis; of these, 25 received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. On univariate analysis, no adverse prognostic factors for OS reached statistical significance, but trends were noted for Stage N1 vs. N0 (p = .06), Nx vs. N0 (p = .09), Stage T3 vs. T1-T2 (p = .06), and histologic findings other than adenocarcinoma (p = .13). The median OS for patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs. surgery alone was 4.8 years and 4.2 years, respectively (log-rank test, p = .56). However, a significantly greater percentage of patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had Stage II disease (p <.001). In the multivariate Cox model, increasing T and N category and histologic findings other than adenocarcinoma were significant predictors of decreased OS. Additionally, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was a significant predictor of improved OS after adjusting for these prognostic factors (hazard ratio for death, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.69; p = .004). CONCLUSION: After adjusting for the stage parameters and histologic findings, our data suggest that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy might improve OS for patients with gallbladder cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy in gallbladder cancer.

Gallbladder cancer (GC) is considered a rare disease associated with a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, the low number of cases makes the performance of trials addressing the role of adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and/or palliative therapy difficult. For a long time, the majority of trials were 5-fluorouracil (5 FU)-based, and results were uniformly poor. Since the introduction of Gemcitabine, response rates of approximately 30% have been observed through the use of this drug and new approaches have been tested. In this sense, drugs such as Cisplatin and Capecitabine have been employed concurrently with gemcitabine and/or radiation. Since a recurrence pattern is both distant and local, chernoradiation seems a logical option to deal with the disease. However, at the present time, the lack of valid and scientific evidence means that most of the recommendations originate from trials dealing with other tumors, such as pancreas cancer and biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aforementioned treatment alternatives warrant further evaluation focusing on GC.

Adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy after resection of primary gallbladder carcinoma: a 23-year experience.

PURPOSE: Primary adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder is a rare malignancy. To better define the role of adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy, a retrospective analysis of the outcome of patients undergoing surgery and adjuvant therapy was undertaken. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with primary and nonmetastatic gallbladder cancer were treated with radiation therapy after surgical resection. Median radiation dose was 45 Gy. Eighteen patients received concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 1.7 years in all patients and 3.9 years in survivors. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, metastases-free survival, and local-regional control of all 22 patients were 37%, 33%, 36%, and 59%, respectively. Median survival for all patients was 1.9 years. CONCLUSION: Our series suggests that an approach of radical resection followed by external-beam radiation therapy with radiosensitizing 5-FU in patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic carcinoma of the gallbladder may improve survival. This regimen should be considered in patients with resectable gallbladder carcinoma.

One hundred consecutive hepatobiliary resections for biliary hilar malignancy: preoperative blood donation, blood loss, transfusion, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Many reports on blood loss and transfusion requirements during hepatectomy for metastatic liver cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma have been published; however, there are no reports on these issues in hepatectomy for biliary hilar malignancy. The aim of this study was to review our experience with blood loss and perioperative blood requirements in 100 consecutive hepatectomies for biliary hilar malignancy. METHODS: One hundred consecutive hepatectomies with en bloc resection of the caudate lobe and extrahepatic bile duct for hilar malignancies were performed, including 81 perihilar cholangiocarcinomas and 19 advanced gallbladder carcinomas involving the hepatic hilus. Fifty-eight hilar resections were combined with other organ and/or vascular resection. Data on preoperative blood donation, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative transfusion were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative autologous blood donation was possible in 73 patients (3.4 +/- 1.2 U). Intraoperative blood loss was 1850 +/- 1000 mL (range, 677-5900 mL), and it was < 2000 mL in 62 patients. Intraoperatively, only 7 of the 73 patients (10%) who donated blood received transfusion of unheated, homologous blood products (packed red blood cells or fresh frozen plasma), whereas 18 the 23 patients (67%) without donation received homologous transfusions. Only 16 patients received transfusion postoperatively, and overall, 35 patients received unheated homologous blood products. Total serum bilirubin concentrations after hepatectomy in patients receiving autologous blood transfusion only was similar to those in patients who did not receive transfusion. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in the 35 patients who received perioperative homologous transfusion than in 65 patients who did not (94% vs 52%; P <.0001). The mortality rate (including all deaths) was 3% (myocardial infarction, intra-abdominal bleeding, and liver failure, 1 patient each). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the technical difficulties arising from hepatectomy for biliary hilar malignancy, approximately two thirds of hepatectomies can be performed in an experienced center without perioperative homologous blood transfusion using preoperative blood donation.

Gallbladder adenosquamous cell carcinoma: report of two cases.

Adenocarcinoma is the usual histological presentation of the very rare gallbladder carcinoma. Adenosquamous cell carcinoma accounts for less than 3.5% of gallbladder carcinomas, and is characterised by invasive growth, a reduced tendency for lymph node metastasis, an increased tendency for hepatic infiltration or liver metastasis, and a poorer prognosis than adenocarcinoma. We present two cases. The first patient presented to our institution with increased bilirubin levels and dilated intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the gallbladder was diagnosed on the post-operative pathological specimen. After surgery, bilirubin levels decreased, but hepatic metastases occurred that did not respond to conventional chemotherapy. The second patient was admitted to our hospital with jaundice and abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging showed marked thickening of the gallbladder with direct extension of a mass into the left liver lobe. Cytology specimens obtained with an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure revealed a malignant epithelial tumour. The patient underwent surgery but the tumour was incompletely resected. A regimen of oral UFT (Tegafur + uracil) chemotherapy was begun. Serum bilirubin levels increased due to occlusion in the surgical area 15 weeks after the start of chemotherapy.

[Adjuvant arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with biliary cancer].

Although surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for biliary cancer, patients frequently develop liver metastasis, local recurrence, and peritoneal metastasis after complete resection. Liver metastasis is a common mode of progression for biliary cancer, and the prognosis is extremely poor when it occurs. Between January 2000 and December 2003, 18 out of 37 patients received adjuvant arterial infusion chemotherapy after curative resection of biliary cancer. Nine of these 18 patients had bile duct cancer, seven had gallbladder cancer, and two had cancer of the papilla of Vater. A catheter was placed using Seldinger's technique, with the tip being advanced into the common hepatic artery via the femoral artery. Then 1,000 mg/body of 5-FU was administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion on days 1-3 and 5-7. Two cycles of this chemotherapy were delivered through an angiography catheter without using a reservoir port. This treatment caused no severe systemic or abdominal complications. The two groups were well balanced with respect to prognostic factors. The 1-year survival rate was 76.2% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 52.7% in the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group, while the 3-year survival rates were 47.6% and 39.5%, respectively (Wilcoxon test, p=0.048). Median overall survival was superior in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and the difference was significant. High-dose arterial infusion of 5-FU seems to be a safe, tolerable, and effective regimen for preventing the postoperative recurrence of biliary cancer.

Is postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy useful for gallbladder carcinoma? A phase III multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the significance of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreaticobiliary carcinoma has not yet been clarified. A randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy with mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (MF arm) versus surgery alone (control arm) on survival and disease-free survival (DFS) for each specific disease comprising resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma (pancreatic, gallbladder, bile duct, or ampulla of Vater carcinoma) separately. METHODS: Between April 1986 and June 1992, a total of 508 patients with resected pancreatic (n = 173), bile duct (n = 139), gallbladder (n = 140), or ampulla of Vater (n = 56) carcinomas were allocated randomly to either the MF group or the control group. The MF group received MMC (6 mg/m(2) intravenously [i.v.]) at the time of surgery and 5-FU (310 mg/m(2) i.v.) in 2 courses of treatment for 5 consecutive days during postoperative Weeks 1 and 3, followed by 5-FU (100 mg/m(2)orally) daily from postoperative Week 5 until disease recurrence. All patients were followed for 5 years. RESULTS: After ineligible patients were excluded, 158 patients with pancreatic carcinoma (81 in the MF group and 77 in the control group), 118 patients with bile duct carcinoma (58 in the MF group and 60 in the control group), 112 patients with gallbladder carcinoma (69 in the MF group and 43 in the control group), and 48 patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (24 in the MF group and 24 in the control group) were evaluated. Good compliance (> 80%) was achieved with MF treatment. The 5-year survival rate in gallbladder carcinoma patients was significantly better in the MF group (26.0%) compared with the control group (14.4%) (P = 0.0367). Similarly, the 5-year DFS rate of patients with gallbladder carcinoma was 20.3% in the MF group, which was significantly higher than the 11.6% DFS rate reported in the control group (P = 0.0210). Significant improvement in body weight compared with the control was observed only in patients with gallbladder carcinoma. There were no apparent differences in 5-year survival and 5-year DFS rates between patients with pancreatic, bile duct, or ampulla of Vater carcinomas. Multivariate analyses demonstrated a tendency for the MF group to have a lower risk of mortality (risk ratio of 0.654; P = 0.0825) and recurrence (risk ratio of 0.626; P = 0.0589). The most commonly reported adverse drug reactions were anorexia, nausea/emesis, stomatitis, and leukopenia, none of which were noted to be serious. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study indicate that gallbladder carcinoma patients who undergo noncurative resections may derive some benefit from systemic chemotherapy. However, alternative modalities must be developed for patients with carcinomas of the pancreas, bile duct, or ampulla of Vater.