A matched-pair analysis on survival and response rates between German and non-German cancer patients treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Research shows disparities in cancer outcomes by ethnicity or socio-economic status. Therefore, it is the aim of our study to perform a matched-pair analysis which compares the outcome of German and non-German (in the following described as 'foreign') cancer patients being treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn at the University Hospital of Bonn between January 2010 and June 2016. METHODS: During this time, 6314 well-documented patients received a diagnosis of cancer. Out of these patients, 219 patients with foreign nationality could be matched to German patients based on diagnostic and demographic criteria and were included in the study. All of these 438 patients were well characterized concerning survival data (Overall survival, Progression-free survival and Time to progression) and response to treatment. RESULTS: No significant differences regarding the patients' survival and response rates were seen when all German and foreign patients were compared. A subgroup analysis of German and foreign patients with head and neck cancer revealed a significantly longer progression-free survival for the German patients. Differences in response to treatment could not be found in this subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, no major differences in survival and response rates of German and foreign cancer patients were revealed in this study. Nevertheless, the differences in progression-free survival, which could be found in the subgroup analysis of patients with head and neck cancer, should lead to further research, especially evaluating the role of infectious diseases like human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) on carcinogenesis and disease progression.

Trajectory and risk factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Asian patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the trajectory of and risk factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Asian patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Adult patients with head and neck cancer scheduled to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy were recruited for the study. Clinical events were collated from standardized diaries. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five patients were included in the analyses. The majority (75.7%) was men, Chinese (81.7%), and manifested nasopharyngeal cancer (83.4%). The overall incidence of significant nausea and vomiting was 73.7% and 24.7%, respectively, with single-day cisplatin regimens of 48.9% and 28.9%, respectively, with the multiple-day cisplatin regimen. Patients using complementary alternative medicine were less likely than others to achieve a complete response to antiemetics. CONCLUSION: Although postchemotherapy vomiting is relatively well controlled in Asian patients with head and neck cancer, postchemotherapy nausea remains problematic in this population.

Chemotherapy with modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic head and neck cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of palliative chemotherapy with a modified docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; "TPF" regimen) regimen (mTPF; reduced doses of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU with reduction of intravenous 5-FU from 4 days to 2 days) in Asian patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) after surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: The mTPF regimen was used in this study. Fifty-five patients (from January 2007 to October 2009) received docetaxel on day 1, followed by cisplatin and 5-FU administered continuous infusion on day 2 for another 48 hours every 3 weeks for three to six cycles. RESULTS: The disease control rate was 81%. The overall response rate was 56%. Five patients achieved complete remission; 26 patients had partial remission; 14 patients had stable disease. Ten patients had disease progression. The metastatic sites that responded well to mTPF regimen (either complete or partial remission) were: neck lymph node, lung, liver, and skin. The median follow-up was 15 months (range 1-28 months). The median overall survival was 10 months (range 2-28 months). The common nonhematological toxicity was alopecia and the most common hematological adverse event was neutropenia. Thirty-one patients (56%) had grade 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The mTPF chemotherapy regimen is efficacious for the palliative treatment of recurrent and metastatic HNSCC in Asian patients.

Race as a social construct in head and neck cancer outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined ancestry informative markers (AIMs) to estimate the amount of population admixture and control for this heterogeneity for stage and survival in a primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Integrated health care system. SUBJECTS: The cohort comprised 358 patients with HNSCC who self-reported race as Caucasian American (CA), African American (AA), or other. METHODS: DNA was interrogated for West African (WA) and European genetic background by genotyping AIMs. Associations of race (self-report or WA ancestry) with stage and survival were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox regression modeling. A subgroup analysis for diagnosis (late vs early stage) and survival (time to death) and WA ancestry was performed for self-reported AAs. RESULTS: There were significant associations between stage and self-reported race (P = .04 [univariate]) and with cancer site (oropharynx: P = .014; hypopharynx: P = .026 [multivariate]). For prognosis, there were significant multivariate associations between stage (P = .002), age (>65 years, P < .001), and cancer site (hypopharynx: P < .001; oral cavity: P = .049), but self-reported race was not associated with overall survival. Interestingly, there was no association with degree of WA ancestry and stage or survival. In the subgroup analysis of genetic ancestry among self-reported AAs, cancer site remained an independent risk factor for stage (other site: P = .026) and survival (oropharynx: P = .036). Late stage persisted as an independent variable for poor survival (P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Stratification within AAs by WA ancestry revealed no correlation with stage or survival, suggesting that HNSCC outcomes with race may be owing to social/behavior factors rather than biological differences.