The current state of headache medicine education in the United States and Canada: An observational, survey-based study of neurology clerkship directors and curriculum deans.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current headache medicine education paradigm in allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in the United States and Canada. BACKGROUND: There is a disparity in the number of clinicians specially trained to treat patients with headache disorders and the number of people who have them. Early education and exposure to headache medicine is crucial to address this disparity. However, the current state of headache education within medical schools across the United States and Canada is unknown. METHODS: The authors created a medical student headache education survey, which is a 20-question REDCap survey that was distributed via email to the neurology clerkship director, curriculum dean, or similar role at each US and Canadian MD or DO conferring medical school. The email listserv was created using the American Academy of Neurology Clerkship Directory, the Association of American Medical Colleges Organization Directory, the American Association of College of Osteopathic Medicine Organization Directory, manual searches of the institutions' websites, and phone calls and emails to administrators as needed. RESULTS: Of the 249 individuals contacted, 78 completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 31.3%. Of those responses, 84.6% of respondents (66/78) reported that their institution has at least one mandatory session on headache disorders. Many of these sessions (72.7% (48/78)) occurred during preclinical training, and 74.2% (49/78) occurred as part of the clinical curricula. Of respondents, 44.9% (39/78) reported that their institutions coordinate headache education across training levels (i.e., from preclinical to clinical), and only 17.9% (14/78) coordinate across clinical rotations. The most common topics covered were headache red flags, migraine, pharmacologic management, and differentiating primary versus secondary headache. 65.4% of respondents (51/78) felt that the preclinical headache curriculum prepares their students for the clinical experience, and 55.1% (43/78) felt that medical students were learning enough about headache medicine at their institution. Barriers to educating medical students about headache included insufficient time during courses, lack of administrative support in curricula development, lack of available resources, and lack of student interest. Case-based learning modules and online lectures were the most desired educational materials to improve medical student headache education at their institution. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of medical schools report incorporating headache medicine education into preclinical or clinical curricula and cover a range of topics in headache medicine. Yet there remains a lack of consistency, with some reporting limited headache education, citing barriers such as lack of administrative support and available educational resources. There is also variation in what is being taught at the medical student level. Future projects should aim to address said barriers, with the goal of providing a standardized headache medicine curriculum for use across medical schools.

Attitudes to functional neurology and some other 'prescriptive' chiropractic techniques and their associations with chiropractic conservatism: a cross-sectional survey of chiropractic students.

BACKGROUND: Chiropractic technique systems ('prescriptive' techniques) might be interpreted as helpful guidelines. However, 'prescriptive' techniques, such as Functional Neurology (FN), Sacro-Occipital Technique, and Applied Kinesiology are more concerned with the 'technical' diagnosis than the condition and its symptoms and, thus, seem to provide easy solutions. DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES: In a voluntary anonymous questionnaire survey carried out late 2017, we explored interest in 'prescriptive' techniques, particularly FN, among French chiropractic students in grades 3-6, and the possible link with chiropractic conservatism. We investigated their: i) attitudes to the use of 'prescriptive' techniques, ii) awareness of FN, and iii) attitudes to FN. Further, if their attitudes to some conservative chiropractic concepts influenced their clinical approach on iv) some 'prescriptive' chiropractic techniques and v) attitudes to FN. METHOD: Data reported in tables illustrated the prevalence of the use of 'prescriptive' techniques, awareness of FN, and positive attitude to FN (i.e. interest in and acceptance of). Students were given a FN score based on five questions on their interest in and acceptance of FN (0 to 5), dichotomized into two groups: 'not positive attitude' (0 to 1) and 'positive attitude' (2 to 5). Chiropractic conservatism was graded from 1 to 4. Associations were tested between conservatism groups and i) interest in 'prescriptive' techniques and ii) FN attitudes groups. RESULTS: The response rate was 67% (N = 359), of which 90% were positive toward 'prescriptive' techniques. Only 10% had never heard about FN and in the 6th year all had heard about it. Only a minority, unrelated to the year of study, approved of the two examples given of FN concepts. Nevertheless, a majority were positive towards FN, more so in the higher grades. Students with the most conservative beliefs were 17 times more likely to want to use 'prescriptive' techniques and 11 times more likely to have a higher FN score. CONCLUSION: Although not taught in the curriculum, these students were attracted to 'prescriptive' techniques including FN, particularly in the higher grades. Curiously, despite this interest they do not generally agree with some key concepts within FN.

Functional neurology after the Second World War: The beginnings of neurology on screen (III).

Treatment of functional symptoms has a long history, and interventions were often used in soldiers returning from battle. On the 75th anniversary of the end of the Second World War, I review the portrayal of neurology in documentary film. Two documentaries were released in 1946 and 1948 (Let There Be Light and Shades of Gray, respectively), which showed a number of soldiers with functional neurology including paralysis, stuttering, muteness, and amnesia. The films showed successful treatments with hypnosis and sodium amytal by psychoanalytic psychiatrists. These documentaries link neurology with psychiatry and are remarkable examples of functional neurology and its treatment on screen.

Reducing Reliance on Test Scores Reduces Racial Bias in Neurology Residency Recruitment.

PURPOSE: We sought to correct a low interview rate for racial groups underrepresented in medicine (URM) by analyzing our interview selection process, identifying sources of unintended bias, and developing a new process that would provide a more racially diverse interview pool. METHODS: We analyzed our review process to determine at which point we were eliminating URM candidates at a higher rate than those who are not from an underrepresented group. A point system was created incorporating clinical grades, extracurricular activities, research, letters of recommendation, board exam scores, and life experiences. We compared the rate at which interviews were offered to URM candidates and compared those rates to historical data. We then analyzed the new process by comparing groups who were offered interviews to those who were not. RESULTS: In 2016, 56% of URM applicants were screened out by a mandatory minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) test score, whereas only 39% of all other groups were disqualified by test scores. This led to 20% of the URM applicants receiving interview offers. By comparison, 30.6% of other groups were offered interviews. After removing the required minimum test score for application review and modifying the screening process to a more holistic one the following application cycle, 24.5% of URMs were offered interviews in 2017 compared to 28.1% of others. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive review of applications that minimizes emphasis on USMLE step 1 scores substantially reduced the difference between the percentages of URMs and those of other racial backgrounds who were offered interviews for a Neurology residency.

Miming neurological syndromes improves medical student's long-term retention and delayed recall of neurology.

Basic examination and diagnostic skills in neurology are important for every graduating medical student. However, a majority of medical students consider neurology as complex and difficult to master. We evaluate the impact a learner-friendly, innovative simulation-based training programme has on long-term retention and delayed recall of neurological semiology amongst third-year medical students from the University Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris, France. The 2013 class received standard teaching in neurological semiology. The 2015 class who received the same standard teaching in neurological semiology were also invited to voluntarily participate in The Move, a mime-based role-play training programme of neurological semiology. During the Move, students were trained to simulate a patient with a neurological syndrome or the physician examining the patient. Students were evaluated with an assessment thirty months after their neurological rotation, including 15 questions to evaluate long-term retention of neurological semiology, and 10 to test background knowledge in general semiology. The semiology test was performed by 366/377 students from the 2013 class (standard education group) and by 272/391 students from the 2015 class, among which 186 participated in The Move (The Move group) and 86 did not (standard education group). The mean neurological semiology score was higher in the 2015 class compared to the 2013 class (p = 0.007) and remained so after adjustment for the general semiology performance (p = 0.003). The adjusted mean neurological semiology score was 1.21/15 points higher [95% CI 0.66, 1.75] in The Move group compared to the standard education group, corresponding to a 14% better ranking. The Move programme improves medical student's long-term retention and delayed recall of neurological semiology. This learner-friendly interactive teaching may in turn enhance clinical proficiency of future physicians in neurological semiology.

[Teaching about chronic pain in psychosomatics courses - an overview of the situation in Germany and the Tübingen Model]. / Schmerzmedizin in der psychosomatischen Lehre ­ Deutschland-Übersicht und Tübinger Modell.

Teaching about chronic pain in psychosomatics courses - an overview of the situation in Germany and the Tübingen Model Objectives: When dealing with chronic pain patients it is crucial to take a bio-psycho-social approach. However, it is unclear how this approach is currently being taught to medical students, and how they judge its role and importance. METHODS: We carried out a qualitative study (questionnaire) asking (1) German psychosomatic departments about pain-related teaching and (2) medical undergraduates about pain-relevant issues. RESULTS: Bio-psycho-social facts are well represented within psychosomatics courses but only theoretically tested. There is still much room for improvement through cross-linking with other disciplines. In Tübingen, "psychosocial factors" and the "empathic doctor-patient relationship" play a significantly higher role when teaching psychosomatic courses than somatic ones. There were no significant differences regarding the role of an "integrative recording of medical history" or how the importance of any of the three topics was rated. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain is well represented in psychosomatic courses in Germany, though exams could be more practical. The establishment of interdisciplinary approaches beyond the teaching of core psychosomatic content could be expanded and especially used more frequently when adapting curricula to competence-based standards.

Opinion and Special Articles: Neurology education at US osteopathic medical schools.

Osteopathic medical schools have a longstanding tradition of training primary care physicians (PCP). Neurologic symptoms are common in the PCP's office and there is an undersupply of neurologists in the United States. It is therefore crucial for osteopathic medical students to have a strong foundation in clinical neurology. Despite the importance, a mere 6% of osteopathic medical schools have required neurology clerkships. Furthermore, exposure to neurology in medical school through required clerkships has been correlated with matching into neurology residency. As osteopathic medical schools continue to expand, it will become increasingly important to emphasize the American Academy Neurology's published guidelines for a core clerkship curriculum. Practicing neurologists should take an active role in encouraging osteopathic medical schools to adopt these guidelines.

The link between anesthesiology and neurology: a mindful cooperation to improve brain protection.

Preventing neurological injury is mandatory during the perioperative period of any kind of surgery and in the care of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. During daily practice, both anesthesiologists and neurologists focus on brain protection as an integral part of systemic homeostasis maintenance. This article highlights the intriguing overlap between anesthesiology and neurology in clinical practice along with its potential implications for outcome. Moreover, it focuses on the importance of the complementary expertise of both specialists in maintaining cerebral homeostasis, with the aim of improving outcome. A review of available evidence on anesthesiology and neurology interplay in clinical practice along with its potential implications for outcome has been conducted. Clinical vigilance and the use of shared monitoring and diagnostic technology could allow early recognition and treatment of cerebral dysfunction occurring in the perioperative period or in the critical care setting, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. In order to improve patient safety and outcome, neurologists and anesthesiologists should more closely and successfully collaborate, using shared monitoring tools and integrating traditional areas of expertise. Daily activity, education, research and training programs in anesthesia and neurology could benefit from a stronger relationship with each other.

Frenkel: ¿un precursor de la neurorrehabilitación? / Frenkel: one of the forerunners of neurorehabilitation?

El término ‘neurorrehabilitación’ es entendido como el proceso destinado a reducir la deficiencia, la limitación de la actividad y la restricción de la participación que padecen las personas como consecuencia de una enfermedad neurológica, y en el que los profesionales involucrados en dicho ámbito tendrán como objetivo la reducción del grado de afectación funcional del paciente. Debido al desconocimiento que existió en relación con la capacidad plástica que presenta el sistema nervioso humano, los orígenes científicos de la rehabilitación neurológica son relativamente recientes, y se sitúan alrededor de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Sin embargo, existen indicios de que el neurólogo Heinrich Sebastian Frenkel (1860-1931) pudo establecer las bases de la neurorrehabilitación antes de esa época. En relación con los trabajos realizados y publicados por Frenkel, existen referentes históricos que apoyarían la hipótesis de que, considerando sus metodologías de tratamiento empleadas y documentadas, lo que denominó Übungstherapie (gimnasia neurológica) podría considerarse la base de la neurorrehabilitación moderna. Estos conocimientos pudieron haberse tenido en cuenta por multitud de autores que introdujeron dichas experiencias y aprendizajes en los diversos métodos terapéuticos que surgieron con posterioridad, incluso los más novedosos y tecnológicos, si bien las raíces de la neurorrehabilitación aplicada podrían encontrarse a finales del siglo XIX (AU)

Neurorehabilitation is understood as the process intended to reduce the deficiency, limitation of activity and restriction of participation experienced by people as a result of a neurological diseases, and where the professionals involved in this field will aim to reduce the functional involvement degree of the patient. Due to the ignorance existed about the plastic capacity in the nervous system in humans, the scientific origins of neurological rehabilitation is relatively recent, which are located around the Second World War. However, there are signs that the neurologist Heinrich Sebastian Frenkel (1860-1931) was able to establish the basis of neurorehabilitation before that time. There are historical concerning regarding the work conducted and published by Frenkel that would support the hypothesis, based on the characteristics of their treatment employed and documented methodologies, that what he called ‘Übungstherapie’ (neurological gymnastic), it could be considered as the basis of what we consider today as modern neurorehabilitation. This knowledge could have been used by many authors who introduced those experiences and lessons learned to the multiple therapeutic methods that emerged after, even the most innovative and technological, while the roots of neurorehabilitation could be found at the end of the 19th century (AU)

[Geriatrics - an interdisciplinary challenge]. / Geriatrie - eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung.

The care of elderly patients will continue to challenge the healthcare system over the next decades. As a rule geriatric patients suffer from multimorbidities with complex disease patterns, and the ability to cope with everyday life is severely reduced. Treatment is provided by a multiprofessional geriatric team, and the primary goal is improvement of functional status, quality of life in the social environment and autonomy by employing a holistic approach. In Germany geriatric care is provided by physicians from various medical specialties (e.g. general practitioners, internists, neurologists and psychiatrists). In the training for the subspecialty clinical geriatrics, these specialties enjoy equal rights. Recent efforts to establish a qualification as physician for internal medicine and geriatrics have initiated a discussion to make the suitability for qualification as a geriatrician dependent on the medical specialty. Geriatric patients benefit from multidisciplinary cooperation. Neurologists possess great expertise in the treatment of patients with dementia, depression, delirium, consequences of degenerative spinal cord diseases and vertebral bone fractures, stroke, Parkinson's syndrome, epileptic seizures, vertigo and dizziness, neuropathies, lesions of peripheral nerves and in the multimodal therapy of pain. To function in a position of responsibility in a geriatric department, neurologists need skills in general internal medicine. These are acquired either on a geriatric ward or during specialization as a neurologist by full time secondment to large neurological or interdisciplinary intensive care units.

[Focal point emergency departments]. / Brennpunkt Notaufnahme.

The number of patients treated in hospital emergency departments in Germany has risen in recent years to approximately 20 million. This escalation also applies to the increasing numbers of patients presenting with neurological symptoms and diseases, which occur in approximately 20 % of emergency patients. In addition to patients with stroke, inflammatory or degenerative central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) disorders who need urgent treatment, more and more patients with nonspecific complaints or conditions attend emergency departments for elective treatment, not least because timely appointments with specialist neurologists in practices could not be obtained. Neurological expertise and presence in emergency departments at the level of specialist standard are therefore indispensable for providing a professional level of treatment, which also corresponds to current legal requirements. The implementation of a generalist emergency physician in Germany, as introduced in some European countries, would mean a retrograde step for neurological expertise in emergency admission management. The discipline of neurology must work together with other emergency disciplines to improve the financing of emergency departments and provide neurologists working there with a substantive curriculum of further and continuing education in emergency-related aspects of neurology. The discipline of neurology has a responsibility to emergency patients within its range of competencies and must, therefore, strengthen and improve its role in healthcare politics and concerning organizational and personnel aspects of neurological emergencies.

Procedural Headache Medicine in Neurology Residency Training: A Survey of US Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: To survey neurology residency program directors (PDs) on trainee exposure, supervision, and credentialing in procedures widely utilized in headache medicine. BACKGROUND: Clinic-based procedures have assumed a prominent role in headache therapy. Headache fellows obtain procedural competence, but reliance on fellowship-trained neurologists cannot match the population eligible for treatments. The inclusion of educational modules and mechanisms for credentialing trainees pursuing procedural competence in residency curricula at individual programs is not known. METHODS: A web-based survey of US neurology residency PDs was designed by the American Headache Society (AHS) procedural special interest section in collaboration with AHS and American Academy of Neurology's Headache and Facial Pain section leadership. The survey addressed exposure, training, and credentialing in: (1) onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) injections, (2) extracranial peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), and (3) trigger point injections (TPIs). RESULTS: Fifty-five PDs (42.6%) completed the survey. Compared to noncompleters, survey completers were more likely to feature headache fellowships at their institutions (38.2% vs 10.8%, P=0.0002). High exposure (onabotA=90.9%, PNBs=80.0%, TPIs=70.9%) usually featured hands-on patient instruction (66.2%) and lectures (55.7%). Supervised performance rates were high (onabotA=65.5%, PNBs=60.0%, TPIs=52.7%), usually in continuity clinic (60.0%) or headache elective (50.9%). Headache specialists (69.1%) or general neurology (32.7%) faculty most commonly trained residents. Formal credentialing was uncommon (16.4-18.2%), mostly by documenting supervised procedures (25.5%). Only 27.3% of programs permitted trainees to perform procedures independently. Most PDs felt procedural exposure (80.0-90.9%) and competence (50.9-56.4%) by all trainees was important. CONCLUSIONS: Resident exposure to procedures for headache is high, but credentialing mechanisms, while desired by most PDs, are not generally in place. Implementation of a credentialing process may ensure trainees enter practice with the ability to perform procedures safely and effectively.

Santiago Ramón y Cajal e Ivan Petrovich Pavlov: ¿existe complementariedad entre sus teorías? / Santiago Ramon y Cajal and Ivan Petrovich Pavlov: does complementarity exist between their theories?

Introducción. Pocos autores han comparado la vida y obra de Cajal y Pavlov, y, cuando lo hacen, se refieren generalmente a su coincidencia en el XIV Congreso Internacional de Medicina que tuvo lugar en Madrid en 1903. Objetivo. Presentar los modelos teóricos de ambos autores para estudiar la posible complementariedad entre sus teorías. Desarrollo. Se presentan las principales características de la teoría neuronal de Cajal, la teoría reticular que le antecedió, los principales resultados de las investigaciones de Cajal y las aportaciones que brindó al concepto de plasticidad. En cuanto a la teoría de los reflejos condicionales de Pavlov, se describen sus principales postulados, las leyes pavlovianas y la tipología del sistema nervioso según Pavlov. Conclusiones. Los niveles de organización en los que trabajan Cajal y Pavlov se pueden entender como complementarios si tenemos en cuenta la propuesta de Henry Wallon o las de marcos epistemológicos como la epistemología estratégica, donde el avance de la ciencia se logra desde estrategias diferentes, pero complementarias, que ayudan a construir modelos teóricos más fuertes (AU)

Introduction. Few authors have compared the life and work of Cajal and Pavlov and they refer normally to their coincidence at the XIV Medicine International Congress of Madrid in 1903. Aims. To describe the theoretical models of both authors and to explain the possible complementarities between the works of Cajal and Pavlov. Development. We describe the principal bases of the ‘neuron theory’ of Cajal, compared to the ‘reticulated theory’, the principal results of Cajal’s investigations and the contributions he made to the concept of plasticity. We describe the ‘Pavlov’s conditional reflections theory’, its principal postulates, pavlovians laws and the typology of the nervous system according to Pavlov. Conclusions. The works of Cajal and Pavlov can be understood as complementary under Wallon’s proposal and in the frame of the ‘strategic epistemology’, where the advance of the science is achieved from different but complementary strategies that help each other to construct stronger theoretical models (AU)

Beyond neural cubism: promoting a multidimensional view of brain disorders by enhancing the integration of neurology and psychiatry in education.

Cubism was an influential early-20th-century art movement characterized by angular, disjointed imagery. The two-dimensional appearance of Cubist figures and objects is created through juxtaposition of angles. The authors posit that the constrained perspectives found in Cubism may also be found in the clinical classification of brain disorders. Neurological disorders are often separated from psychiatric disorders as if they stemmed from different organ systems. Maintaining two isolated clinical disciplines fractionalizes the brain in the same way that Pablo Picasso fractionalized figures and objects in his Cubist art. This Neural Cubism perpetuates a clinical divide that does not reflect the scope and depth of neuroscience. All brain disorders are complex and multidimensional, with aberrant circuitry and resultant psychopharmacology manifesting as altered behavior, affect, mood, or cognition. Trainees should receive a multidimensional education based on modern neuroscience, not a partial education based on clinical precedent. The authors briefly outline the rationale for increasing the integration of neurology and psychiatry and discuss a nested model with which clinical neuroscientists (neurologists and psychiatrists) can approach and treat brain disorders.

[University teaching in clinical neurology: present situation and future requirements]. / Universitäre Lehre in der Neurologie : Aktuelle Situation und zukünftiger Bedarf.

BACKGROUND: In German Hospitals there is a lack of medical personnel and doctors in particular. Clinical specialities and hospitals are in competition for students and young doctors and these, in turn, have clear cut demands regarding working conditions and professional training. To date there is considerable heterogeneity regarding clinical teaching in neurology between different German universities. There are no data available for systematic comparison. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This article presents for the first time data from a survey on academic teaching in neurology in German university hospitals. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The data show that many faculties are dedicated to modern and practical teaching methods and have employed state of the art examinations and progress tests. Further and ongoing efforts will be needed in order to inspire medical students and young doctors for this interesting clinical speciality. Connecting individual formats and networking between universities, teaching hospitals, including novel developments together with the young neurologists will help to structure our efforts and increase sustained attractiveness of clinical neurology for the following generations of young doctors.

Emerging subspecialties in neurology: deep brain stimulation and electrical neuro-network modulation.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical therapy that involves the delivery of an electrical current to one or more brain targets. This technology has been rapidly expanding to address movement, neuropsychiatric, and other disorders. The evolution of DBS has created a niche for neurologists, both in the operating room and in the clinic. Since DBS is not always deep, not always brain, and not always simply stimulation, a more accurate term for this field may be electrical neuro-network modulation (ENM). Fellowships will likely in future years evolve their scope to include other technologies, and other nervous system regions beyond typical DBS therapy.

Estimulación cerebral profunda en la enfermedad de Parkinson / Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Introducción. Desde su aparición en la década de los noventa, la estimulación cerebral profunda se ha impuesto como una alternativa terapéutica segura y eficaz en la enfermedad de Parkinson, estando indicada cuando aparecen complicaciones motoras incontrolables con el tratamiento farmacológico. Objetivo. Realizar una revisión actualizada de la literatura médica sobre los aspectos más importantes de esta cirugía funcional. Desarrollo. Aunque su mecanismo de acción a día de hoy continúa siendo desconocido, se ha postulado que ejerce una acción inhibitoria sobre la actividad de los núcleos subtalámico y globo pálido interno, que se encuentra exaltada en enfermos parkinsonianos. La técnica quirúrgica de elección es la estimulación del núcleo subtalámico. Ha demostrado tener unos resultados favorables tanto desde el punto de vista motor, con una mejoría significativa de los síntomas cardinales de la enfermedad, como en la calidad de vida de estos pacientes. El éxito de la cirugía depende de tres pasos fundamentales: 1) La adecuada selección del candidato quirúrgico, teniendo en cuenta las recomendaciones de los principales grupos de estudio sobre factores pronóstico como son la edad, el tiempo de evolución y la presencia de síntomas resistentes a la levodopa. 2) La correcta posición del electrodo en la diana quirúrgica. 3) La programación del sistema de estimulación. Conclusión. La estimulación cerebral profunda del núcleo subtalámico es una opción terapéutica claramente establecida en la enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada, cuyo desarrollo en los últimos años, ha favorecido la obtención de unos resultados clínicos favorables cuando el tratamiento farmacológico fracasa (AU)

Introduction. Since its appearance in the nineties, deep brain stimulation has proved itself to be a safe, effective therapeutic alternative in Parkinson's disease, and is indicated when there are motor complications that pharmacological treatment fails to control. Aims. The purpose of this work is to conduct an updated review of the medical literature on the most important aspects of this functional surgery. Development. Although today its mechanism of action remains unknown, it has been suggested that it exerts an inhibitory action on the activity of the subthalamic nuclei and internal globus pallidus, which is found to be overexcited in patients with parkinsonism. The preferred surgical technique is subthalamic nucleus stimulation. This procedure has proved to yield favourable results both from the motor point of view, with a significant improvement in the cardinal symptoms of the disease, and as regards these patients’ quality of life. The success of the surgical procedure depends on three fundamental steps: 1) Selection of a suitable candidate for surgery, taking into account the recommendations of the main study groups on prognostic factors, such as age, time to progression and the presence of symptoms that are resistant to levodopa; 2) The correct position of the electrode on the surgical target; 3) The programming of the stimulation system. Conclusions. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is a clearly established therapeutic option in advanced Parkinson's disease. Recent developments allow favourable clinical outcomes to be obtained when pharmacological treatment fails (AU)